Should be fixed in raring with this release:
http://changelogs.ubuntu.com/changelogs/pool/universe/c/cpufreqd/cpufreqd_2.4.2-2/changelog
** Changed in: cpufreqd (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Ah, it's fixed in debian with cpufreqd 2.4.2-2 (see bugreport above)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/733507
Title:
cpufreqd assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/sbin/cpufreqd:
** Changed in: cpufreqd (Debian)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/733507
Title:
cpufreqd assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/sbin/cpufreqd:
There seems to be some activity on debian:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619913#25
This patch will probably shipped with cpufreqd in wheezy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Mhhh, strange that there is no effort in Ubuntu AND Debian to fix this
problem. A working patch is known since nearly one year but no effort is
shown in both distros to fix this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I second that. I run cpufreqd with this patch applied since 2012-04-05
on my laptop for everydays work which is heavily loaded and cpufreqd
makes a big difference for me with respect to noise and battery lifetime
under heavy load. The apparent lack of interest in fixing that is
puzzling: is Ubuntu
** Tags added: raring
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/733507
Title:
cpufreqd assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/sbin/cpufreqd:
free(): invalid pointer: 0x09067b10 ***
To
Also can confirm this patch works. Kubuntu 12.10 (Lenovo T430) and
Kubuntu 12.03 (Lenovo T500)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/733507
Title:
cpufreqd assert failure: *** glibc
Just tested the attached patch from comment #7 and can confirm (as far
as i can test) that this fixes the reported problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/733507
Title:
cpufreqd
This affects me as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/733507
Title:
cpufreqd assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/sbin/cpufreqd:
free(): invalid pointer: 0x09067b10 ***
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #619913
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619913
** Also affects: cpufreqd (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=619913
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because
** Changed in: cpufreqd (Debian)
Status: Unknown = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/733507
Title:
cpufreqd assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/sbin/cpufreqd:
There are actually two bugs in cpufreqd_acpi_battery.c:
1. update_battery() doesn't check whether a battery is open or not. This
causes the SIGSEGV
2. init_battery() doesn't know about that attribute current_now has been
replaced by power_now in recent kernels.
Both bugs are fixed with the
The attachment A fix for this bug. of this bug report has been
identified as being a patch. The ubuntu-reviewers team has been
subscribed to the bug report so that they can review the patch. In the
event that this is in fact not a patch you can resolve this situation by
removing the tag 'patch'
** Tags added: precise
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/733507
Title:
cpufreqd assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/sbin/cpufreqd:
free(): invalid pointer: 0x09067b10 ***
To
With some debugging I found, that cpufreqd crashes within the plugin
cpufreqd_acpi.so. The function acpi_battery_update tries to read battery
information in sysfs (/sys directory) with libsysfs functions. Because
of an invalid pointer cpufreqd crashes here.
I could work around this bug with
This forum comment from Debian project may be of interest. Has anyone else
tested if this is a reboot/resume issue for them only, as well? I'll try
testing tonight.
http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=10t=70191
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/733507
Title:
cpufreqd assert failure: *** glibc detected *** /usr/sbin/cpufreqd:
free(): invalid pointer:
18 matches
Mail list logo
