Syncing this stack of packages affects seeded packcages, so it's too
late for precise (the first one I checked, libchewing3, is on the Ubuntu
DVD, so I stopped looking). For the Qt issue, it should be addressed
with a more focused fix via SRU.
** Changed in: fcitx (Ubuntu)
Status: New =
Well, is it possible to update through precise-updates ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/980773
Title:
Sync fcitx 1:4.2.2-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
To manage
I agree that the im-switch fix would be better off with a cherry-pick.
As long as it is not entirely broken, it's much safer to do that as an
SRU.
Does the new fcitx version actually require all those new packages, or
are these independent? I. e. can the new versions be SRUed and tested
one by
On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I agree that the im-switch fix would be better off with a cherry-pick.
As long as it is not entirely broken, it's much safer to do that as an
SRU.
Does the new fcitx version actually require all those new packages, or
subscribing release team to get their opinion, even if I think we are
too late in the cycle to change that. It really depends on what mean
works a lot better...
** Changed in: fcitx (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Summary changed:
- Sync fcitx 1:4.2.1-2 (universe) from Debian testing (main)
+ Sync fcitx 1:4.2.2-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
** Description changed:
- -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
- Hash: SHA1
-
- affects ubuntu/fcitx
- status new
- importance wishlist
- subscribe
Hi Pitt,
It was tested that version 1:4.2.2-1 with other packages up-to-date in
Sid can work in Ubuntu Precise directly, so syncing this package will
require syncing other packages which versions were falling behind of
Debian.
Actually version 1:4.1.2-2 and higher will work a lot better than the
