The verification of the Stable Release Update for lxd has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a regr
The verification of the Stable Release Update for shadow has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
Yeeah, ok.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959375
Title:
[SRU] Please support group manipulation with "extrausers"
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.laun
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubiquity has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for glibc has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a re
The verification of the Stable Release Update for glibc has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a re
The verification of the Stable Release Update for glibc has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a re
The verification of the Stable Release Update for glibc has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a re
The verification of the Stable Release Update for glibc has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a re
The verification of the Stable Release Update for glibc has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a re
Do these steps need to be taken in any particular order? Does the
removal of the ubuntu-drivers-common plugin need to happen before
removing sl-modem so as to prevent breakage?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bu
Hello Michael, or anyone else affected,
Accepted kubuntu-settings into jammy-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-
settings/1:22.04.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
To what extent is this a minimal change to fix the issue? I'm unfamiliar
with Plymouth scripting, but wouldn't it be simpler to fix the existing
theme than to wholesale replace it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:
The verification of the Stable Release Update for containerd has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounte
Verifying this as per bug #1960449. This should probably have been a
duplicate of that bug.
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
verification-needed-impish
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal
verification-done-impish
--
You received this bug notif
The verification of the Stable Release Update for containerd has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounte
Someone should look at the focal arm64 FTBFS. It's been recently retried
and failed with SIGKILL, suggesting OOM, so it probably needs more than
just a no-thought hitting of the retry button.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
Is there anyone (maybe on the Server team) who has experience with etcd?
This still looks like a worthwhile SRU, but I'm hesitant to do it
without a plan for testing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
Hello Sergio, or anyone else affected,
Accepted postgresql-12 into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postgresql-12/12.10-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new pack
I've accepted this into -proposed on the basis that it'll make it
possible for you to verify, and it's easy to reject if it turns out you
can't verify it its easy to remove from proposed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Hello sam, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gvfs into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gvfs/1.44.1-1ubuntu1.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubu
The verification of the Stable Release Update for horizon has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
Hello Marcus, or anyone else affected,
Accepted containerd into impish-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/1.5.9-0ubuntu1~21.10.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted containerd into impish-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/1.5.9-0ubuntu1~21.10.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted docker.io into impish-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/docker.io/20.10.12-0ubuntu2~21.10.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
So, I'm a little confused about the
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DockerUpdates policy here, specifically when it
states “The aim is to backport the .1 release of a major version…” and
the upload here is for runc 1.1.0. Is the claim here that 1.1.0 vs 1.0.1
is not a major version release? Is the policy o
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted docker.io into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/docker.io/20.10.12-0ubuntu2~20.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Marcus, or anyone else affected,
Accepted containerd into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/1.5.9-0ubuntu1~20.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected,
Accepted containerd into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/containerd/1.5.9-0ubuntu1~20.04.1
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. S
Hello jeremyszu, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-drivers-common into impish-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/1:0.9.2.4~0.21.10.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by tes
Hello jeremyszu, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-drivers-common into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/1:0.9.0~0.20.04.7 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testin
Hm. That commit has too many dependencies to cherry-pick (or even
cherry-pick a small series) without significant conflicts. It might be
still possible to *understand* the patch and write an equivalent for
5.15.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Thanks for that bisect.
Annoyingly, that commit doesn't cherry-pick cleanly onto 5.15, but I'll
see if I can munge it up to test.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958620
Title:
[Dell
Nope. It looked like a good candidate, but isn't the fix.
5.17.1 fails, drm-tip succeeds, so the fix is somewhere between v5.17
and drm-tip. I'm (slowly) bisecting to find the commit that fixes it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
I suspect this may have been fixed by
9ce5884e5139037445d0efcf37aeba21008011ad; I'm building an Ubuntu kernel
with that cherry-picked to test.
Hm. Although that seems to have been included in 5.16, and I *thought*
I'd verified that 5.16 exhibited the bug?
--
You received this bug notification be
Confirmed, 6d7a793aabf31d7ba2b16fc13a94cc is bad, it's predecessor is
good.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958620
Title:
[Dell XPS 15 9575] Flickering white/black screen once KMS com
Further investigation:
Affects:
1) 5.13.19 does not suffer from this bug
2) The Ubuntu 5.15 kernels, and mainline 5.16 and 5.17 kernels *do* suffer from
this bug.
Also of note: this only occurs the *first* time KMS tries to come up on
the panel, and *only* if there is not a second monitor plugged
The verification of the Stable Release Update for cloud-init has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounte
Removing packages from jammy:
php-doctrine-bundle 2.2.3-1ubuntu1 in jammy
php-doctrine-bundle 2.2.3-1ubuntu1 in jammy amd64
php-doctrine-bundle 2.2.3-1ubuntu1 in jammy arm64
php-doctrine-bundle 2.2.3-1ubuntu1 in jammy armhf
php
The verification of the Stable Release Update for tzdata has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a r
Hello Corey, or anyone else affected,
Accepted manila into impish-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/manila/1:13.0.0-0ubuntu2 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://w
Hello jeremyszu, or anyone else affected,
Accepted nvidia-prime into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-
prime/0.8.16~0.20.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello jeremyszu, or anyone else affected,
Accepted nvidia-prime into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-
prime/0.8.16~0.20.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Alberto, or anyone else affected,
Accepted nvidia-prime into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-
prime/0.8.16~0.20.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello errors.ubuntu.com, or anyone else affected,
Accepted nvidia-prime into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-
prime/0.8.16~0.20.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello jeremyszu, or anyone else affected,
Accepted nvidia-prime into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-
prime/0.8.16~0.20.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Dropping my comments from #ubuntu-release in here for posterity:
RAOF: Oh! I think I see where I'm wrong. /etc/manila/policy.json isn't
shipped in the package, it's /usr/share/manila-common/manila.conf which
is then munged into /etc/manila/policy.json by pkgos_write_new_conf in
the postinst, so it
Why does this remove PID 0xE7: synaptics-add-new-PID-0x100-and-remove-
PID-0xE7
It seems that this is removing some device support. Why?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1962277
Title:
Hello Ruben, or anyone else affected,
Accepted golang-github-containers-buildah into impish-proposed. The
package will build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-github-containers-
buildah/1.21.3+ds1-1ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
P
Hello jeremyszu, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-drivers-common into impish-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/1:0.9.2.4~0.21.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by tes
Hello jeremyszu, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-drivers-common into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/1:0.9.0~0.20.04.6 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testin
Hello kunal, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gst-plugins-bad1.0 into focal-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-
plugins-bad1.0/1.16.3-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new p
This seems like a reasonable change, but I am worried about potential
API incompatibility - etcd 3.2.26+dfsg-6 has been in 20.04 for 2 years
now, so there'll be plenty of users, some of which will almost certainly
have explored every possible strange edge case.
This is still a reasonable SRU - we
The verification of the Stable Release Update for postgresql-13 has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encou
An upload of manila to impish-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "Needs at least to do proper dpkg-
conffile handling, also see questions above".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
Some questions:
/etc/manila/policy.json is a conffile, so the usual conffile handling stuff
should be done - either mv_conffile or rm_conffile from dpkg-maintscript-helper
or (since impish has a new-enough dpkg) use the new remove-on-upgrade flag in
deb-conffiles.
Since policy.json *is* a conff
Hello Roman, or anyone else affected,
Accepted lxd into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxd/1:0.10 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Tes
Hello Stéphane, or anyone else affected,
Accepted lxd into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxd/1:0.10 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/
An upload of lxd to focal-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "Oops, sorry.".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964833
Title:
Disable "latest" as
An upload of lxd to focal-proposed has been rejected from the upload
queue for the following reason: "Not-entirely-necessary change of
translatable string".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Hello kunal, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gst-plugins-base1.0 into focal-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-
plugins-base1.0/1.16.3-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello kunal, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gst-plugins-good1.0 into focal-proposed. The package will build
now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-
plugins-good1.0/1.16.3-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the
-proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello kunal, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gstreamer1.0 into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gstreamer1.0/1.16.3-0ubuntu1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
The verification of the Stable Release Update for linux-firmware has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you enco
I've been most recently running on git commit
2fc02bbf3a654c4e56fae51518f9983733ccd776, which would be slightly after
2.4.8.
I see that we've got a new thermald version (2.4.7) in the archive. I
shall re-enable the system thermald and see if I can still reproduce.
--
You received this bug notifi
Sorry about the late reply. I do not exactly know how to reproduce this
behaviour, so I've been consistently running upstream thermald and
collecting the logs while using the laptop normally.
Unfortunately, I have not observed this behaviour with the upstream
thermald, so I can't get the requested
Removing packages from jammy-proposed:
onetbb 2021.5.0-7 in jammy
libtbb-dev 2021.5.0-7 in jammy amd64
libtbb-dev 2021.5.0-7 in jammy arm64
libtbb-dev 2021.5.0-7 in jammy armhf
libtbb-dev 2021.5.0-7 in jammy ppc64el
Done. Additionally, moved libphp8.1-embed php8.1-bcmath php8.1-bz2
php8.1-enchant php8.1-fpm php8.1-intl php8.1-phpdbg php8.1-soap
php8.1-sybase php8.1-xsl to universe as suggested by component-
mismatches. This matches the corresponding php8.0 packages in impish.
** Changed in: php8.1 (Ubuntu)
Ok. So, we now have three bugs with identical descriptions - this one,
bug #1942789, and bug #1946476. Either they're independent bugs, in
which case they should have different test cases, or they're basically
all the same bug, in which case we should pick one of the bugs and mark
the others as dup
The verification of the Stable Release Update for alsa-ucm-conf has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encou
Ok. So it seems that the bug *exists* in Focal, so now we just need to
verify that the bug is *fixed* by the proposed package.
@angie78 - as you seem to suffer from the bug, can you try to verify
that the proposed packages (from
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libx11/+bug/1782984/comment
The verification of the Stable Release Update for ubiquity has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
The verification of the Stable Release Update for partman-auto has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encoun
Ok. This would appear to be a ld bug. In a partially built tree, I get:
> /usr/bin/c++ -g -O2
> -ffile-prefix-map=/home/chris/Canonical/Mir/mir/main/cmake-build-debug=.
> -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects -flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects
> -fstack-protector-strong -Wformat -Werror=format-security -pthre
Are you guaranteed to be able to know the set of architecture(s) of
libgcc_s needed? That's what's prevented me from suggesting a patch like
that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958594
For the nvidia-settings upload, the new wording looks somewhat strange:
++ " in on-demand mode (only if nvidia version >=
450; "
++ "otherwise, the behavior will approach to "
++ "performance mode). This opt
Hello jeremyszu, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-drivers-common into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-
common/1:0.9.0~0.20.04.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testin
I've accepted this, but have amended the test plan to try and ensure
this doesn't change the behaviour on the -450 series drivers.
I'm not entirely sure what the "" check
should be. @Alberto, @Jeremy: Could you please replace that part of the
test-plan with the steps required to check that on-dema
Hello jeremyszu, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-drivers-common into impish-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-drivers-common/1:0.9.2.3 in
a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this n
The verification of the Stable Release Update for update-manager has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you enco
There is no scanout hardware connected to the AMD GPU, so if there is
any involvement by amdgpu it is purely by making i915 misbehave.
This is also not a GNOME bug - the display corrupts as soon as the KMS
driver is loaded, which, since I've got an encrypted rootfs, is early in
the initramfs. The
Public bug reported:
I recently rebooted my laptop, and couldn't unlock my (cryptsetup-
managed) root filesystem; after entering my passphrase, the plymouth
prompt would always say “unable to unlock /dev/nvme0n1p3_crypt”.
Dropping to text mode, I can see that cryptsetup is failing with a message
Public bug reported:
This looks like a regression from the 5.13.0-20-generic kernel to the
5.15.0-17-generic kernel. The display works fine under efifb, but as
soon as the DRM drivers are loaded and KMS kicks in the display is
replaced by black with flickering white (apparently when what would be
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gdb has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a regr
Huh.
Looks like cmark-gfm has already migrated out of jammy-proposed. I don't
think we can roll back anymore, and will need to go forward instead.
I think the way forward would be to upload a
0.29.0.gfm.2.really.0.29.0.gfm.0-like package containing the old
package, to build a working libcmark-gfm
For SRU verification we require that the actual package from the
-proposed archive is tested. This is to avoid the chance that the patch
is mis-applied in the package uploaded to the archive, or that the
archive build environment differs in a way that affects the patch.
We'll also need this to be
The verification of the Stable Release Update for command-not-found has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you e
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-hirsute
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-hirsute
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1876034
Title:
apt update cr
Removing packages from jammy-proposed:
php-composer-xdebug-handler 2.0.2-1 in jammy
php-composer-xdebug-handler 2.0.2-1 in jammy amd64
php-composer-xdebug-handler 2.0.2-1 in jammy arm64
php-composer-xdebug-handler 2.0.2-1 in jammy armhf
So, I think the next step here is to work out how to answer the question
“what happens with -390”, and to commit to *testing* what happens with
-390 as a part of the test plan.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bu
The verification of the Stable Release Update for debootstrap has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encount
I think we're talking past each other again.
I believe you when you say that this update will not cause a regression
for users of the Xilinx desktop image who have not edited the
configuration in /etc/X11/Xwrapper.config
The issue we, on the SRU team, are concerned about are the two caveats there
Hello Gauthier, or anyone else affected,
Accepted walinuxagent into impish-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/2.2.46-0ubuntu3.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
Hello Gauthier, or anyone else affected,
Accepted walinuxagent into focal-proposed. The package will build now
and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/2.2.46-0ubuntu1.1 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package.
The gdb upload looks fine; I presume it wants to be marked block-
proposed, though?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927192
Title:
gdb ftbfs on armhf, testsuite timeouts
To manage not
Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,
Accepted gdb into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gdb/9.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 in a few
hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wi
Public bug reported:
The only copyright recorded in the python-scramp source is the LICENCE
file. It would be nice to have headers in the source files, too.
** Affects: python-scramp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: New
** Changed in: python-scramp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Unde
Public bug reported:
DEP-5 recommends recording the license as Expat (when it matches, which
python-scramp's does) rather than MIT, which is ambiguous.
** Affects: python-scramp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: New
** Changed in: python-scramp (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
The verification of the Stable Release Update for pure-ftpd has
completed successfully and the package is now being released to
-updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter
The verification of the Stable Release Update for nvme-cli has completed
successfully and the package is now being released to -updates.
Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being
unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In
the event that you encounter a
201 - 300 of 5537 matches
Mail list logo
