[Bug 63153] Re: No grub menu after upgrading from dapper to edgy

Attached. ** Attachment added: menu.lst attached http://librarian.launchpad.net/4624904/menu.lst -- No grub menu after upgrading from dapper to edgy https://launchpad.net/bugs/63153 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 67190] home page settings lost after dist-upgrade

Public bug reported: After doing a dist-upgrade from Dapper to Edgy, the home page settings in Firefox are lost. Specifically, the Home Page setting in Edit-Prefs is blank (whereas I believe it used to be a static Ubuntu file from teh doc team). (The Edit-Prefs-When-Firefox-starts field is

[Bug 67190] Re: home page settings lost after dist-upgrade

Yes, the homepage is back, so it is effectively fixed for me. I can't confirm if it's fixed for someone doing a dist-upgrade for the first time, as I can't test that. -- home page settings lost after dist-upgrade https://launchpad.net/bugs/67190 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 66432] print defaults are annoying

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org-calc The default way in which OO prints spreadsheets is to print every worksheet in the file. I believe that a high percentage of the time, the user actually only wants to print the currently active worksheet, and I think it would be a

[Bug 62946] typo in warning message

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: synaptic During a dist-upgrade, I got a warning message about support ending for a number of packages. Small typo in that message: havn't should be haven't ** Affects: synaptic (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- typo

[Bug 62948] can't install apparent updates

Public bug reported: I did a dist-upgrade from Dapper to Edgy-Beta. It generally went very smoothly, but at the end of the process update-manager believes I have about 40 updates that need to be installed (one is hpijs and the remaining 39 or so are python- packages). However, when trying

[Bug 63155] still have test pattern usplash after dist-upgrade

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: usplash I did a dist-upgrade from Dapper to Edgy-beta. In general it went smoothly. However, upon rebooting, I have the test pattern usplash instead of the Ubuntu artwork. I suspect this is a video driver thing and may be related to bug 63153. **

[Bug 63153] Re: lost grub after dist-upgrade

A little more info: - I have a Thinkpad T42 - I suspect this is also related to bug 63155 -- lost grub after dist-upgrade https://launchpad.net/bugs/63153 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 63153] lost grub after dist-upgrade

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grub I did a dist-upgrade from Dapper to Edgy-beta. In general it went smoothly. Upon rebooting, I now longer have a grub screen, but rather get a screen full of random characters and then it automatically continues to boot Linux (I have a Windows

[Bug 63158] new shell in Edgy causes package to not work

Public bug reported: The new shell in Edgy causes eciadsl to stop working.Suggested fix (I haven't confirmed this) is to change the top line from #!/bin/sh to #!/bin/bash. Would probably be better to fix this in the package than to have other, less-ideal suggested fixes floating around. See

[Bug 63158] Re: new shell in Edgy causes package to not work

Explicitly invoking bash in the scripts as above worked for me. But I also had to change the script mount lines to refer to usbfs not usbdevfs. -- new shell in Edgy causes package to not work https://launchpad.net/bugs/63158 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 63158] Re: new shell in Edgy causes package to not work

Explicity invoking bash in the scripts as above worked for me. But I also had to change the script mount lines to refer to usbfs not usbdevfs. -- new shell in Edgy causes package to not work https://launchpad.net/bugs/63158 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 222796] Re: Brightness up not generating ACPI event on Thinkpad T43p, T42, X31, X40, R52

I have an X60s. The recent hotkey update made by volume up/down keys worked (they had worked in Hardy, but regressed in Intrepid Beta). However, the mute hotkey invokes Lock Screen. I believe a previous reporter with an X60s noted that a brightness key made music/audio stop playing. This

[Bug 280676] Re: no sound in intrepid beta

Audio reappeared with 10 Oct update. Probably fixed. -- no sound in intrepid beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 282799] [NEW] gnome-session not starting panel

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-session After update in Intrepid Beta, I can't get to a normal desktop. The panel doesn't start, metacity crashes. We've tried creating an entirely new user, but the same problems persist. gconf dump attached. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386

[Bug 282799] Re: gnome-session not starting panel

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18505499/Dependencies.txt -- gnome-session not starting panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282799 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 282799] Re: gnome-session not starting panel

** Attachment added: gconf.xml http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18505521/gconf.xml -- gnome-session not starting panel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/282799 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 204659] [NEW] call it 8.04 LTS in upgrade windows

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager In the update manager window, the a new distribution is available line calls the new version 8.04. It should be called 8.04 LTS. Similarly, in the Distribution Upgrade progress window, the header says Upgrading Ubuntu to version 8.04.

[Bug 40702] Re: Way too much orange icons

I just upgraded to 8.04 LTS (Hardy) Beta and think this is an issue again. I am not presenting this from a personal taste I like/don't like orange perspective, but from a functional perspective I believe we have lost a lot of usability. For example, compare the following set of icons, all of which

[Bug 209695] [NEW] attachments open in read only mode

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mozilla-thunderbird When clicking on an attachment to a Thunderbird mail message, OpenOffice will open that attachment in read-only mode. This is new behaviour in 8.04 LTS, and has been implemented in response to bug #87101. However, I personally

[Bug 87101] Re: when opening an attachment, it should be written to tmp as a read-only file

I think the fix has introduced a new bug. Please see bug #201134 -- when opening an attachment, it should be written to tmp as a read-only file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/87101 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 87101] Re: when opening an attachment, it should be written to tmp as a read-only file

Sorry, don't see the bug linked above, it has nothing to do with this. Instead, please see bug #209695 :) -- when opening an attachment, it should be written to tmp as a read-only file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/87101 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 209695] Re: attachments open in read only mode

Yes, I'm proposing that the behaviour we are trying to guard against is people unintentionally saving files to temp storage. So it seems to me a reasonable way to address that (where reasonable means I don't really know how hard the tech implementation is ;) ) is to provide a suitable warning

[Bug 209695] Re: attachments open in read only mode

I looked for the plugin you mention, but can't find it. Can you confirm name and repository? Thanks, Jane -- attachments open in read only mode https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209695 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 99771] Re: update manager not running after upgrade

Didn't happen in an upgrade from 7.04 (Feisty) to 7.10 (Gutsy), so bug should probably be closed. Thanks! -- update manager not running after upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/99771 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for

[Bug 17641] Re: wastebasket opens automatically

No longer happens. I think it's safe to mark this as closed. Cheers, Jane -- wastebasket opens automatically https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/17641 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 18203] Re: essid ignored, system confused by other APs

I can't duplicate this anymore (am on Ubuntu 7.04 and a different set of wireless APs), so perhaps best to close it. -- essid ignored, system confused by other APs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18203 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct

[Bug 132251] wired network with Intel 82573L doesn't work

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6-386 On a Thinkpad X60s (with Intel 82573L), the wired network only works if the network cable is plugged in at boot time. This is seen both in 7.04 (Feisty) and in the Gutsy development build from 12 Aug 07. ** Affects: linux-meta

[Bug 132251] Re: wired network with Intel 82573L doesn't work

I don't know if this matters, but do you want that when it recognises the wired network (i.e,. plugged in at boot) or when the wired doesn't work? -- wired network with Intel 82573L doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132251 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 132251] Re: wired network with Intel 82573L doesn't work

** Attachment added: lspci-vv.output http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8809188/lspci-vv.output -- wired network with Intel 82573L doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132251 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

[Bug 132251] Re: wired network with Intel 82573L doesn't work

** Attachment added: lspci-vvn.output http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8809189/lspci-vvn.output -- wired network with Intel 82573L doesn't work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/132251 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

[Bug 63153] Re: No grub menu after upgrading from dapper to edgy

Probably best to close this one - too old to reproduce the issue now. Thanks! -- No grub menu after upgrading from dapper to edgy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/63153 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. --

[Bug 331618] [NEW] make new tab behaviour consistent in Firefox

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox I am filing this bug as part of the Feature Freeze exception process[1]. Currently, when you start Firefox the first tab opens with a search page (on the belief that search is one of the most common use cases in this scenario). However, when

[Bug 348517] [NEW] contradictory message in upgrade process

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Upgrading from 8.10 (Intrepid) to 9.04 Beta (Jaunty) (okay,actually a few days before the actual beta...), in the Do you want to start the upgrade? window, I am told: This download will take about 9 minutes with your connection.

[Bug 348560] [NEW] screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xorg I have an Iiyama ProLite B2403WS monitor. Ubuntu 8.10 (Intrepid) provided reasonable screen resolution; Jaunty beta (actually the day before beta) no longer does. I don't remember the resolution it used to find, but it was higher than the current

[Bug 348566] [NEW] menu icons don't match other file icons

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org I just upgraded to 9.04 Beta (actually the day before the beta). I have new Open Office icons for the relevant files, but the small icons in GNOME menu are the same icons as in previous releases. I think they should match. i.e,. the

[Bug 348599] [NEW] mute on volume control UI has no effect

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-media I'm running 9.04 Beta (actually day before the beta). The mute option in the volume control window (accessed from the top panel) seems to have no effect. The hardware mute button works fine. This is possible related to (or perhaps a

[Bug 348889] [NEW] too many notifications after upgrade to Jaunty

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pidgin After an upgrade to Jaunty beta, my system now notifies 4 different ways of a new IRC message. I have the 2 new ones from the new notification scheme (i.e, the black bubble and the envelope in the top panel) and I have the 2 old ones (the Pidgin

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: LsHal.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360306/LsHal.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: LsMod.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360307/LsMod.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: XorgConf.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360309/XorgConf.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560] apport-collect data

Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: xorg 1:7.4~5ubuntu16 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 ProcVersion: Linux version 2.6.28-11-generic (bui...@palmer) (gcc version 4.3.3 (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) ) #37-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 23 16:40:23 UTC

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360305/Dependencies.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: LsPci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360308/LsPci.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360311/XorgLog.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360313/Xrandr.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360312/XorgLogOld.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: glxinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360314/glxinfo.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: setxkbmap.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360315/setxkbmap.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: system.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360316/system.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: xdpyinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360317/xdpyinfo.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: xkbcomp.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24360320/xkbcomp.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348908] [NEW] Flash v9 crashes Firefox in Jaunty (beta)

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox After an upgrade to Jaunty Beta, the previously installed Flash plugin reliably caused Firefox to crash. Version in question was Shockwave Flash version 9.0 r48. Shockwave Flash version 10.0 r22 seems to work. ** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)

[Bug 348560] Re: screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty

Aaargh, doing apport-collect with the external monitor actually turned on, which I suspect will be more helpful :) -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 348560] apport-collect data

Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04 Package: xorg 1:7.4~5ubuntu16 PackageArchitecture: i386 ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 ProcVersion: Linux version 2.6.28-11-generic (bui...@palmer) (gcc version 4.3.3 (Ubuntu 4.3.3-5ubuntu4) ) #37-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 23 16:40:23 UTC

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361085/Dependencies.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: LsHal.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361086/LsHal.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: LsMod.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361087/LsMod.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: LsPci.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361088/LsPci.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: XorgConf.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361089/XorgConf.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361090/XorgLog.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361093/Xrandr.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: glxinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361095/glxinfo.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: setxkbmap.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361096/setxkbmap.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361091/XorgLogOld.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: system.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361097/system.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: xdpyinfo.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361098/xdpyinfo.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 348560]

** Attachment added: xkbcomp.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24361099/xkbcomp.txt -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 349129] [NEW] window notification never stops

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 A normal Firefox notification is to have the minimised window in the lower panel (sorry, I don't know what to call that) pulse with colour. E.g,. if you click on a link from another app like email, Firefox opens that page and you get that

[Bug 349472] [NEW] update-manager won't start

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager I am running Jaunty beta, and after updating this morning update-manager won't start. Trying in a terminal, I get j...@randolph:~$ update-manager Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/bin/update-manager, line 29, in module

[Bug 356152] [NEW] update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-notifier This report is not a duplicate of bug #332945. I upgraded to Jaunty beta on Wed 25 March. According to the desired behaviour described in bug #332945 and elsewhere, update-manager should notify me at least once a week to tell me about

[Bug 356152] Re: update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week

Unfortunately this morning I forced an update (still hadn't seen any automatic notification). But for completeness... j...@randolph:~$ ps ax | grep update-not 3427 ?S 0:00 update-notifier --startup-delay=60 j...@randolph:~$ killall update-notifier ; update-notifier --debug-updates

[Bug 357143] Re: [LENOVO 17045UG] suspend/resume failure

** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24966281/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24966282/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24966283/Dependencies.txt **

[Bug 357143] [NEW] [LENOVO 17045UG] suspend/resume failure

Public bug reported: Failure to resume after suspend. Note that I previously reported bug #350178, which was complicated by a failing/failed battery. I now have a shiny new battery which behaves perfectly as far as I can tell, but still had a resume failure. ProblemType: KernelOops Annotation:

[Bug 356152] Re: update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week

** Attachment added: term.log.1.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24967727/term.log.1.gz -- update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356152 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 356152] Re: update-manager doesn't show updates, even after 1 week

So you seem to be saying that I installed something from Add/Remove and that reset the 7 day clock, and therefore I didn't get any notification about updates. Is that right? If so, I think there is more to this than that. I very well could be wrong, but I don't *think* I installed anything.

[Bug 361021] [NEW] tracker indexer never finishes

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: tracker Running 9.04 (Jaunty) beta, after a rebooting Tracker starts to index files, and never finishes. It hangs about, using around 48% CPU until I explicitly kill it. The System Monitor says it is running, but the hover bubble never changes (stalled

[Bug 350178] [NEW] [LENOVO 17045UG] suspend/resume failure

Public bug reported: Failed to resume after suspend. It *may* have been that the battery ran out while it was suspended, because I may have some funkiness in my battery. Or that could be entirely unrelated :) ProblemType: KernelOops Annotation: This occured during a previous suspend and

[Bug 350178] Re: [LENOVO 17045UG] suspend/resume failure

** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24445383/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24445384/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24445385/Dependencies.txt **

[Bug 351437] [NEW] gnome-power-manager reports battery alive when it appears to be dead

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-power-manager g-p-m is reporting that my battery is charged, has about an hour of life left. However, the hardware battery light is flashing to indicate a fault, and if I unplug then the laptop immediately dies. I'm assuming my battery has just

[Bug 351449] [NEW] update notification no longer appears after upgrade

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager After upgrading to Jaunty (beta) the notification icon for update- manager no longer appears. My settings check for updates daily, and should display the icon when there are updates. When I start the update-manager directly (i.e., Sys -

[Bug 351449] Re: update notification no longer appears after upgrade

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 332945 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332945 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 332945 [Jaunty] Update Notifier icon would provide useful status information -- update notification no longer appears after upgrade

[Bug 351484] [NEW] update-manager options no longer match functionality

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager Given the new behavior described in bug #332945 , it seems to me that the options in update-manager are misleading. For example, - I have update-manager configured to check for updates daily. Why give me this option when you have

[Bug 351484] Re: update-manager options no longer match functionality

Screenshot of System-Admin-Update manager-Settings attached. ** Attachment added: Screenshot-Software Sources.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24506326/Screenshot-Software%20Sources.png -- update-manager options no longer match functionality https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351484 You

Re: [Bug 447049] Re: face browser should respond to enter as well as a mouse click

I reported the bug originally, but haven't been able to reproduce it since this morning's updates (12 Oct). Of course those updates may be unrelated - will let you know if I experience it again. It sounds like others are still seeing it though, at least intermittently. -- Login/face browser

[Bug 446206] [NEW] (Karmic beta) Add/Remove Software still appears in menus, in addition to Software Center

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center After an upgrade to Karmic Beta, I have the Software Center in the Applications menu (yay!), but I also have Add/Remove Software under System-Administration. I think the later shouldn't be there. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386

[Bug 446206] Re: (Karmic beta) Add/Remove Software still appears in menus, in addition to Software Center

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33290796/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: XsessionErrors.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33290797/XsessionErrors.txt -- (Karmic beta) Add/Remove Software still appears in menus, in addition to Software Center

[Bug 351484] Re: update-manager options no longer match functionality

This issue still exists in Karmic. -- update-manager options no longer match functionality https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351484 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 447049] [NEW] face browser should respond to enter as well as a mouse click

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gdm (Karmic Beta) The face browser requires you to mouse click on the person you want to login as. It should also allow you to proceed by pressing enter when the desired person is highlighted (i.e, not require the mouse). ** Affects: gdm (Ubuntu)

[Bug 444362] Re: [boot-experience] status/debugging text incorrectly appears on boot

Video of boot attached. ** Attachment added: boot_text.3gp http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33347589/boot_text.3gp -- [boot-experience] status/debugging text incorrectly appears on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 442933] Re: OpenOffice icons in Apps menu in Karmic beta are wrong

I'm afraid I no longer have a Jaunty system available to show you how they were before, so let me try to explain what I'm talking about. In previous releases of Ubuntu, we made what was considered a big step forward in terms of the Open Office icon usability. Specifically, the icons associated

Re: [Bug 442933] Re: OpenOffice icons in Apps menu in Karmic beta are wrong

Hmm, I looked at the Human icons and it's not how I remembered. Maybe this changed a while ago and I didn't notice. I will look around some more - there may have been a change of direction on this sometime in previous releases when I wasn't looking :) -- OpenOffice icons in Apps menu in

Re: [Bug 444362] Re: [boot-experience] status/debugging text incorrectly appears on boot

FWIW, I no longer see those messages. For me at least, it seems to have been fixed in some of the updates that have come out during the beta period. -- [boot-experience] status/debugging text incorrectly appears on boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/444362 You received this bug notification

[Bug 352293] [NEW] apport-collect creates extraneous bug mail by doing attachments individually

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apport The apport tools are very cool! But apport-collect collects a bunch of logs/config files and attaches them to the bug one by one. This generates a lot of bug mail, and a lot of vertical space in the bug page in Launchpad. However, I note that

[Bug 348560] Re: screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty

Yep, manually editing xorg.conf as suggested worked. Will leave it to you whether to close the bug or leave it open (one could argue that it should have been detected and set up automatically). Thanks! -- screen resolution detection regression in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348560

[Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP

I don't think Ubuntu/Canonical should *write* a plain English version of someone else's license. Obviously Mozilla has written the license in the language they want our users to read and understand, and our interpretation of that may not be the same as Mozilla's or the law's interpretation. I

[Bug 269656] Re: AN IRRELEVANT LICENSE IS PRESENTED TO YOU FREE-OF-CHARGE ON STARTUP

I'd like to reassure everyone that we are productively and actively engaged with Mozilla, and that there is a strong desire from everyone involved to identify a positive, constructive solution that addresses the concerns raised in this bug report. Also, please remember that this page is, in

[Bug 280676] [NEW] no sound in intrepid beta

Public bug reported: When I upgraded to Intrepid Beta on 7 Oct, sound worked. After today's update (9 Oct), sound doesn't work. Alsa info at http://www.alsa- project.org/db/?f=396a832572721b4c1d8293f81f62b1ae65926f44 This could be a duplicate of

[Bug 31483] Re: Default window size of Preferences window insufficient

I have since upgraded to version 6.10 (Edgy) and it seems the problem is still there. My resolution is 1024x768. I tried at 800x600 and didn't notice a change in behaviour. -- Default window size of Preferences window insufficient https://launchpad.net/bugs/31483 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 74682] Re: Mysterious segfault of many GNOME programs makes gnome-session unresponsive

I noticed this behaviour as well (up to date Edgy). Several hours before noticing the issue, gaim crashed. At some point during the day (perhaps at the time of the gaim crash) I also had some sort of error/bug reporting dialog (which I don't think was the Gnome bug buddy), which I canceled.

  1   2   3   4   >