Public bug reported:
Does not respond when I lock by light-locker. Same thing happens when I
switch user even if light-locker is not running. Display stays black,
but keyboard lights stay on.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: light-locker 1.8.0-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: U
I got this when upgrading from 16.04 to 18.04
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637923
Title:
package libpt2.10.11 (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying
to overwrite '/usr
Max, how does end user apply the patches?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737750
Title:
nvidia-graphics-drivers fail to build [error: implicit declaration of
function ‘init_timer’]
3Wouter Depuydt, would the same work for 340.107-0ubuntu0.18.04.1?
Doesn't apt report about broken dependencies later?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737750
Title:
nvidia-graphics-dr
cwdruf, luckily, there are some ways.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798414
Title:
update-initramfs should produce a more helpful error message when
there isn't enough free spa
Sean, I think then there is a bug in the locker of your choice (which?),
if it does not hide the screen before its command exits. Anyway, I am
glad to know that you could use the patch in Xubuntu 18.10.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
** Description changed:
I'm running Xubuntu 17.10. After I installed libglib2.0-dev
2.54.1-1ubuntu1, light-locker 1.7.0-2ubuntu1 stopped working correctly,
because it couldn't ready its schema (/usr/share/glib-2.0/schemas/apps
.light-locker.gschema.xml) anymore, so it couldn't get its sett
Verified unattended-upgrades 1.1ubuntu1.18.04.7~16.04.1
** Tags removed: verification-needed-xenial
** Tags added: verification-done-xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1458204
Title
I can verify the update-notifier 3.168.10
Did not test unattended-upgrades
Did not change the tag since it is the same for unattended-upgrades
unfortunately.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
** Description changed:
The preffered way to get encrypted disks, these days, is to do full disk
encryption using LUKS.
- If per-directory encryption is required, it is recommended to us fscrypt
- support in e.g. ext4.
+ If per-directory encryption is required, it is recommended to use
+ fs
I have provided a patch for xfce4-session 4.12.1 at
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-session/+bug/1054299/comments/39
However, when the patch is applied, there is some issue with error handling.
Besides, Xubuntu 18.04 does not have pm-utils installed (and thus pm-suspend
does not
The "error" you tell in #47 is actually not an error, but warning. It
should not stop suspend from working. Theo, did bluesabre test the
patch? Did the test fail even if xflock4 returned 0?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
Can you still enable lock-on-suspend by manually editing the power
manager settings in live session, if you want to test it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1421443
Title:
suspending x
Maybe it would work in Xenial that has pm-utils.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054299
Title:
Race condition in suspend scripts reveals desktop
To manage notifications about this bu
Oh, it seems to be dropped from Xubuntu.
How did you launch suspend? Try "xfce4-session-logout --suspend" in
terminal.
xfsm-shutdown-helper seems still to rely on pm-utils on Linux.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
htt
Do you have pm-utils installed? What if you use another locker in
xflock4?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054299
Title:
Race condition in suspend scripts reveals desktop
To manage n
The bug is in xfce4-session/xfce-screensaver.c (and in xfce4-session
/xfsm-systemd.c before git commit
9fa8c63b4377bcb46b8471da509ff8bd909c4bf0).
A locker should be called syncronously, not by g_spawn_command_line_async (),
but by g_spawn_command_line_sync () or directly by g_spawn_sync(), and th
You could try replacing
"g_spawn_command_line_sync ("xflock4", NULL, NULL, exit_status, error);"
by
"g_spawn_command_line_sync ("xflock4", NULL, NULL, exit_status, NULL);"
(In git in calls of g_spawn_command_line_async NULL is used for the
error parameter (in xfce-sreensaver.c). Error variable mi
Oh, how does it break suspend?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054299
Title:
Race condition in suspend scripts reveals desktop
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://b
Oh, I see. It does not work anyway in 18.04
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536237
Title:
gnome-screensaver-command --lock starts the daemon
To manage notifications about this bug go
Why does it need to be approved upstream?
You asked what if the locker does not exit immediately. It is pointless
question with current xflock4 (in Xubuntu releases), as it does not have
such lockers (or they are run in background). xlock is not available for
Ubuntu. slock is so tiny and fast lock
Bug #1777848
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536237
Title:
gnome-screensaver-command --lock starts the daemon
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net
gnome-screensaver-command --lock
does not work, but exits with 0 even if gnome-screensaver is running.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1777848
Title:
screen never locks
To manage noti
And in 18.04 it is unable to start the lock even if the daemon is
running, and still exits with 0, so it is badly broken.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1536237
Title:
gnome-screensav
Oh, in my experience it does not spwan gnome-screensaver anymore in
18.04, but please tell about that in the bug report. It is still
unconfirmed bug there.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Oddly in Xenial, where gnome-screensaver is 3.6.1-7ubuntu4 the bug
occurs, but in 18.04, where the version is 3.6.1-8ubuntu3, it does not
launch the daemon, but exits with 0 without locking.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun
That is handled in xflock4 I attached in
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10217 :
If such a fallback locker is used, they will be called in background in
xflock4. If you have defined such a locker in xfce4-session ->
/general/LockCommand configuration variable, you should not set
xfce4-se
I do not know. It is still in the repos and seems to be supported by the
latest xfce4-session in git.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1537507
Title:
xflock4 fails to lock, if light-loc
Do you know other issues with gnome-screensaver?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1537507
Title:
xflock4 fails to lock, if light-locker (and xscreensaver) is not
running, but still ex
Like told in comment
https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=318937#c65
it only works, if I have set "use the system title bar and borders" in chrome /
chromium settings.
** Also affects: xfwm4 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notificat
By using --query option like I do in
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/attachment.cgi?id=7254 I referred to in
previous comment (or in the attachment I uploaded in comment #4 about
two and half years ago).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
So the fix would be to modify the xflock4 script. I have done such a fix
and I have developed the script further; See my attachment (and recent
comments) at https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10217
Note that later version of xfce4-session puts primary burden of
determining which locker to u
Please test this patch, if you are able to build xfce4-session. (I
created the patch using diff -Nrud)
** Patch added: "call xflock4 synchronously and return according to its exit
status"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-session/+bug/1054299/+attachment/5189082/+files/xfsm-syst
Oh, yes, albeit the xfce-screensaver.c is present only in newer
xfce4-session than what is used by Xubuntu.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054299
Title:
Race condition in suspend scr
It still fails to work corrently, if additionally gnome-screensaver is
installed, but not running IIRC. Please confirm.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1537507
Title:
xflock4 fails to
Theo, sorry, but I can not even find the part of code where the locking
is executed as part of suspend to RAM function.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1054299
Title:
Race condition in
Seems to work with 18.04, too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1703216
Title:
light-locker locking does not work with suspending Xfce session
To manage notifications about this bug go
Seems to work now in 16.04. I use different graphics card and driver now
FWIIW.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1703216
Title:
light-locker locking does not work with suspending Xfce s
Theo, Xfce Bugzilla #10089 should be fixed.
Testing this is easiest with xscreensaver:
$ pkill light-locker(or whatever screen saver daemon is running.)
$ xscreensaver
(Install it first, if you have to.)
Setup long "fade to black when blancking" duration in the Advanced tab
of Screensaver Pr
** Description changed:
Try the following:
- Log in a gnome-classic session
- Select "Switch User" in the top-right menu
(you are now on lightdm, your former session is supposed to be protected by a
password)
- Switch to a random TTY
- Switch back to the graphical session: you are
** Summary changed:
- When switching user, session is not properly locked (Gnome-classic)
+ When switching user, session is not properly locked
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904006
Ti
** Changed in: xfce4-power-manager
Importance: Wishlist => Undecided
** Changed in: xfce4-power-manager
Status: Fix Released => New
** Changed in: xfce4-power-manager
Remote watch: Xfce Bugzilla #6413 => None
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1737750 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737750
For some reason I get this error also with kernel 4.4.0-134-generic
thought I have Hardware enablement stack installed. So maybe I have to
remove HWE to be able to use the Nvidia driver again.
--
You recei
Does it work better, if you turn off automatic locking on suspend via
power manager settings and run 'xflock4 && xfce4-session-logout
--suspend' in terminal, instead?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
Public bug reported:
I used pcmanfm to view files on my USB connected mobile device and run
some actions on a file. pcmanfm freezed, but I killed it. Still the
related task keeps running.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: libmenu-cache-bin 1.0.1-1ubuntu0.2
ProcVersionSignature
In which versions of the packages the fix is released? Which release of
Ubuntu?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1757008
Title:
Broadcom wireless drivers failed to build [error: implici
I used nvidia-bug-report.sh to report this bug to nvidia. (I had to
email to an address reported by the script.)
Release highlights for the 340 driver:
https://www.nvidia.com/Download/driverResults.aspx/135161/en-us
" The 340.xx legacy Unified Memory kernel module is incompatible with recent
Linu
I have to take words back. In Xubuntu 16.04 and 18.04 system does not
wait until xflock4 finishes before suspending, so the bug seems to be
present in Xfce 4.12
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
(In reply to siukola.antti from comment #0)
> Running XFCE on Xubuntu 13.04 and noticed that suspend + lock screen doesn't
> always work as expected. When I'm suspending the system and the option "Lock
> screen when going for suspend/hibernate" is used, the system seeems to
> suspend normally. Howe
Bugs of nvidia-340 have been marked as duplicate of this bug. Should
they be separated?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1737750
Title:
nvidia-graphics-drivers-304 304.137-0ubuntu2 ADT
I tested failing xflock4 by Xubuntu 18.04.1 live session (that has xfce4
-power-manager 1.6.1-0ubuntu1). I killed light-locker and tested that
xflock4 fails returning 1. Power manager is set to lock screen on
suspend. Then I run 'xfce4-session-logout --suspend'. No lock, no error
dialog. Same thing
No, not on login screen or TTY. I have no other DE installed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785387
Title:
Euro sign not working on keyboard (Macbook)
To manage notifications about
Tex, the command you used failed because of Bug #1678187. However it
succeeded to purge many kernels and related packages. But package linux-
image-extra-4.13.0-36-generic was not successfully purged technically.
What does command 'dpkg -l linux-image-extra-4.13.0-36-generic' print?
Anyway, you can
Public bug reported:
https://askubuntu.com/q/1059447/21005
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: xfce4-settings 4.12.0-2ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-29.31~16.04.1-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-29-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0u
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1453512 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1453512
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1453512
Disable touchpad while typing does not work if Duration set < 1,0 s
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Description changed:
The feature "Disable touchpad while typing", which can be set in xfce4
-mouse-settings is currently useless, because it's default delay is
somewhere around 500ms, which is far too much for a convenient usage.
The problem is that we (users) are actually unable to
This bug affects Xfce, too, if light-locker is not running.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/904006
Title:
When switching user, session is not properly locked (Gnome-classic)
To manage
If you have light-locker running, and do the steps in the description,
session will remain locked, but it will show desktop for short time.
This is in Xubuntu 16.04, which does not have lxsession installed. I do
not see how lxsession is affected.
--
You received this bug notification because you
Is this bug affecting gnome-screensaver and mate-screensaver only?
light-locker is fork of gnome-screensaver, too, but I could not
reproduce the bug in Xubuntu using light-locker.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
** Description changed:
Test video:
https://youtu.be/22ftfoCSPQI
Tested in chromium-browser with setting "Use hardware acceleration when
available".
+
+ Oh, when I use google-chrome, instead, there is no such tearing.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: xorg 1:7.
Public bug reported:
Test video:
https://youtu.be/22ftfoCSPQI
Tested in chromium-browser with setting "Use hardware acceleration when
available".
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+13ubuntu3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-29.31~16.04.1-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Li
This bug started to show up in Xenial with linux-generic-hwe-16.04, and
not just linux-generic-hwe-16.04-edge, as the former was updated to
version 4.15.0.29.51 in xenial-security:
$ apt-cache policy linux-generic-hwe-16.04
linux-generic-hwe-16.04:
Installed: 4.15.0.29.51
Candidate: 4.15.0.29.
In Xubuntu 16.04 the bug remains, but I get light-locker lockscreen
where I have to give password.
** Tags added: xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1703216
Title:
light-locker lo
Seth, what do you mean by Xfce's screenslocking package? Ubuntu Mate
18.04 does not contain light-locker package by default:
http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-mate/releases/18.04/release/ubuntu-
mate-18.04-desktop-amd64.manifest
What is the screenlocking package for Mate?
--
You received this bug
** Description changed:
- We should switch the default kernle install to the signed kernel. This
+ We should switch the default kernel install to the signed kernel. This
makes it much harder to uninstall the signed kernel in environments
which enforce the kernel to be signed. Boot loaders w
** Bug watch added: Xfce Bugzilla #12958
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12958
** Also affects: xfce4-terminal via
https://bugzilla.xfce.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12958
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
** Tags added: xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550898
Title:
Remembers only history of one tab when restoring saved session
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1571195 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571195
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1571195
package libjpeg-progs 8c-2ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: trying to
overwrite '/usr/bin/rdjpgcom', which is also in package libjpeg-turbo-progs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1571195 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571195
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1571195
package libjpeg-progs 8c-2ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: trying to
overwrite '/usr/bin/rdjpgcom', which is also in package libjpeg-turbo-progs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1571195 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571195
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1527455
package libjpeg-progs (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: försöker
skriva över "/usr/share/man/man1/djpeg.1.gz" som också finns i paketet
libjp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1571195 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571195
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1571195
package libjpeg-progs 8c-2ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: trying to
overwrite '/usr/bin/rdjpgcom', which is also in package libjpeg-turbo-progs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1571195 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571195
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1527455
package libjpeg-progs (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: försöker
skriva över "/usr/share/man/man1/djpeg.1.gz" som också finns i paketet
libjp
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1571195 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571195
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1571195
package libjpeg-progs 8c-2ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: trying to
overwrite '/usr/bin/rdjpgcom', which is also in package libjpeg-turbo-progs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1550124 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1550124
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1550124
package libjpeg-progs 8c-2ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: trying to
overwrite '/usr/bin/rdjpgcom', which is also in package libjpeg-turbo-progs
I think these are duplicates of each other despite the different
libjpeg-turbo-progs version:
Bug #1550124
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571195
Title:
package libjpeg-progs 8c-2ubu
Why would you want to install both libjpeg-progs and libjpeg-turbo-progs?
"apt-cache depends libjpeg-progs" tells they conflict and replace each other.
I noticed similar issue after upgrading from Trusty to Xenial. Both packages
were installed. I resolved that by purging libjpeg-progs. I did not
Public bug reported:
info -f grub -n 'Simple configuration' tells the variables are
deprecated. GRUB_TIMEOUT_STYLE could be defined, instead.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: grub-pc 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.17
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-119.143-generic 4.4.114
Uname: Lin
It is explained at 'GRUB_DEFAULT' what is the default. At least in
Xenial and later the documentation states:
'GRUB_HIDDEN_TIMEOUT'
Wait this many seconds before displaying the menu. If is
pressed during that time, display the menu and wait for input
according to 'GRUB_TIMEOUT'.
Oh, the test case seems to be same, marking verified.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1675079
Title:
16.04 LTS Partition /boot fills up with Kernel images, gets underwear
in a twist
Does this need different kind of verification for Xenial than what I did
in Bug #1624644?
** Description changed:
[Impact]
- * Update-manager and unattended-upgrades install many kernel packages during
the lifetime of a release but does not remove them automatically leading to
those packa
Public bug reported:
Exported file is zero sized.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: keepass2 2.25+dfsg-1ubuntu0.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-116.140~14.04.1-generic 4.4.98
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-116-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3
** Tags removed: verification-failed-xenial
** Tags added: verification-done-xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1624644
Title:
By default settings unattended-upgrade does not autom
** Description changed:
[Impact]
* Update-manager and unattended-upgrades install many kernel packages during
the lifetime of a release but does not remove them automatically leading to
those packages filling disk space potentially completely filling /boot and
making the system unable t
Yes, it is good that update-manager can do removing, as that is what
most people use anyway. linux-purge might still have some use e.g. if
for some reason /boot becomes full, or there are non-autoremovable
kernel packages (which may happen in 14.04 even with kernels installed
using update-manager
Brian, I tested the update-manager version you told. It is true that
update-manager removes the unused packages, but step 3. (unattended-
upgrades) does not remove the unused kernels.
I add failed tag as this bug is originally about unattended-upgrades.
** Tags removed: verification-needed-xenial
Testing is painfully slow because connection to e.g.
archive.canonical.com is very slow.
Downgrading in step 2 does not work without --allow-downgrades
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/16
I used "dkms status" to get the required information about the module
name (nvidia-340) and version (340.104)
After rebuilding and rebooting at least HDMI works with
4.4.0-116-generic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
$ dkms list
outputs nothing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753050
Title:
Does not recognize external monitor
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net
M G, which method you used?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798414
Title:
update-initramfs should produce a more helpful error message when
there isn't enough free space
To manage
** Description changed:
$ printf 'a
b\0b' | grep --null-data "a
b" | hexdump -C
61 0a 62 00 62 00 |a.b.b.|
0006
expect
61 0a 62
+
+ EDIT:
+
+ Apparently, in the above the pattern string is considered as two
+ patterns 'a'
As told in the description, with kernel 4.4.0-112-generic the outputs are
recognized and work fine.
The next kernel I installed was 4.4.0-116-generic with which the bug appears.
The bug is not fixed in v4.16-rc4.
** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
St
Public bug reported:
Neither HDMI (digital) nor VGA (analog) output work with the kernel.
With 4.4.0-112-generic they work fine.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: linux-image-4.4.0-116-generic 4.4.0-116.140
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-116.140-generic 4.4.98
Uname: Linux
natalieaoneal, in Artful purge-old-kernels simply runs "sudo apt-get
autoremove". See Bug #1686138
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798414
Title:
update-initramfs should produce a more
** Description changed:
It would be easier to read technical description about updates, if there
- were more rows visible e.g. after maximizing the Software Updater
- window.
+ were more rows visible e.g. after maximizing the Software Updater window
+ when available updates are being presented.
Does this occur also when Software Updater is just presenting available
updates? Can it show more than 2 rows for details then?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1690541
Title:
Scrolled
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1690541 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1690541
I think this is not likely a duplicate. It appears in Xubuntu 16.04. And
I am not talking about the details box during downloading or installing,
but especially when it has displayed available updates.
--
Public bug reported:
It would be easier to read technical description about updates, if there
were more rows visible e.g. after maximizing the Software Updater
window.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: update-manager 1:16.04.10
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-109.132-generi
Cool, I was not aware of those variables.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1501884
Title:
linux-image-extra-*-generic postrm script runs install actions
To manage notifications about t
Workaround is to use black and white coloring: vlc -I ncurses --no-color
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1723712
Title:
Bad coloring in ncurses interface
To manage notifications about
Steve Holton, maybe you are using Ubuntu 14.04 and have some manually installed
kernels, see Bug #1089195.
Do updated instructions at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RemoveOldKernels
help to fix your system? (I suggest trying linux-purge, which I have written.)
--
You received this bug notifi
301 - 400 of 2389 matches
Mail list logo
