> So I really wish for a new official ubuntu package up-to-date.
Anyway, this won't happen, because simply packages are not updated to new
releases in stable releases (apart from few exceptions).
Also, this bug is not really actionable, as "program is unstable" is not much
to go on. Besides, I
This feels a lot like something's wrong with your system; there is no real way
a package can cause (or fix) a similar error by itself.
Did you perhaps interrupted some upgrade in the past (by removing power, for
example)?
Can you just try to `apt-get install --reinstall mythes-en-us` ?
**
jbicha did it one hour ago, and I did it again now..
marking as fix committed so probably nobody else will do it again
(it's in the NEW queue)
** Changed in: clojure (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
well, you're talking about updating the package from a version present
in a ppa, you can see how that can't really be supported.
in your case just uninstall the python-path.py package you installed
from whatever ppa; that package is not following the Debian's Python
Policy regarding the naming of
uploaded the SRU, now in the unapproved queue.
** Changed in: vlc (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1639750
Title:
subtitle
Version 2.2.4-11 in zesty fixes this.
** Changed in: vlc (Ubuntu Zesty)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1639750
Title:
subtitle downloads
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640892
Title:
pbuilder: remove_packages() checks for existence in host, not in
Anyhow, that migrated 22 hours ago, so this is definitely ready now.
But I'm kinda busy this week at a conference, so if anybody wants to chime in
feel free to.
** Changed in: spyder (Ubuntu Zesty)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you
So, this happened in Debian, and it's now synced in Ubuntu too.
closing.
** Changed in: up-imapproxy (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614062
It would be more interesting to know why this doesn't get autosynced,
given that this package is not present in ubuntu.
The reason is that it has been deleted during the Vivid cycle with the
message "conflicts with kdesdk-kio-plugins". Is that still true?
** Package changed: ubuntu => kdesvn
apparently you already did it without closing this bug.
Anyway, I agree: Ubuntu does not support multiple init system, so
keeping upstart-realted deltas is not useful.
** Changed in: daemontools (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you
Well, there are spurious words about ppa and such. But I suppose I could
handle that myself before uploading.
Now it's only really about having the zesty version migrating.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
This bug was fixed in the package ocserv - 0.11.4-2
Sponsored for Mike Miller (mtmiller)
---
ocserv (0.11.4-2) unstable; urgency=high
* d/p/allow-parallel-build-of-autogen-files.patch: Fix parallel build race on
autogen files (Closes: 844882)
* d/control: Add Depends:
ok, could you add them to the changelog please?
(note that I "invalidated" the "devel" task, the xenial task is good; this
makes for better view in the sponsoring overview)
** Changed in: ffmpeg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Also affects: ffmpeg (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ffmpeg (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: ffmpeg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Summary changed:
- FFmpeg security fixes December 2016 II
+ FFmpeg security
** Also affects: ffmpeg (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ffmpeg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: ffmpeg (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => Triaged
** Summary changed:
- FFmpeg security fixes December 2016
+ FFmpeg security fixes
This one upload doesn't seem to fix any CVE, why should it go through
security over regular SRU?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647226
Title:
FFmpeg security fixes December 2016
To
All uploaded.
Thank you!
** Changed in: pcs (Ubuntu Zesty)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: pcs (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: pcs (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: pcs (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Assignee:
** Changed in: pcs (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: pcs (Ubuntu Zesty)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: pcs (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: pcs (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided => Medium
**
** Changed in: pcs (Ubuntu Zesty)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
** Changed in: pcs (Ubuntu Zesty)
Assignee: Rafael David Tinoco (inaddy) => (unassigned)
** Changed in: pcs (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: pcs (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance:
Umh, why did you close the Debian bug?
btw, I'll handle this during the day; the patches look good.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640919
Title:
pcs cluster setup hangs
To manage
This bug was fixed in the package fb-music-high - 0.1.2+nmu1
Sponsored for Hans Joachim Desserud (hjd)
---
fb-music-high (0.1.2+nmu1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer upload.
* Integrate changes from 0.1.2ubuntu1:
+ debian/rules: Convert to dh sequencer.
+
On Fri, Dec 09, 2016 at 05:57:03PM -, Andrew Shadura wrote:
> As you can see he'll upload it "soon" :)
please poke once he does (even on IRC if you feel so).
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''
Sure. It needs to be fixed in zesty first though. Maybe you can get
sramacher to release quicker? :) (or, tbf, I could do a Team Upload
being in the debian-multimedia team, but I'd rather not, I've never
touched vlc)
** Also affects: vlc (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided
Status:
Now, I approved all series nomination (of this and the related bugs),
please fix up the metadata accordingly.
For the uploads: I'm always kinda ick to upload a package introducing a delta
from debian, but well...
What I don't like are the changelogs: you're barely saying what you did, just
** Also affects: pcs (Ubuntu Zesty)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Rafael David Tinoco (inaddy)
Status: Confirmed
** Also affects: pcs (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: pcs (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
** Also affects: pcs (Ubuntu Zesty)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Rafael David Tinoco (inaddy)
Status: Confirmed
** Also affects: pcs (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: pcs (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
** Also affects: pcs (Ubuntu Zesty)
Importance: Medium
Assignee: Rafael David Tinoco (inaddy)
Status: Confirmed
** Also affects: pcs (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: pcs (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Note that now in the copyright notices you have a repetition:
under the terms of the under the terms of the
You might want to fix it for your next release (no need for it now).
And... uploaded!
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug
Well, this particular merge is done (didn't notice it lacked the LP: ...
meta-tag to close the bug).
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/freehdl/0.0.8-2.2ubuntu1
** Changed in: freehdl (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
Dropping those changes is tricky, and at the very least requires adding
a Conflict on the library package against the v5 version.
Personally I think it's easier/safer to just carry on with this; it
would have been better to do this change in Debian by means of a NMU
(the package looks
I approved the tasks for yakkety/zesty of this bug, please fix up properly the
metadata.
I also triggered that autopkgtest of ipython (trigger python-qtconsole/4.2.1-3)
for the failing archs (not just amd64).
For the SRU, could you propose an uploadable debdiff too?
But I personally won't
Ok, you can find the proposed package in
https://launchpad.net/~mapreri/+archive/ubuntu/lp-1646538
The debdiff:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/297013877/pdns-recursor_4.0.0~alpha2-2_4.0.0~alpha2-2ubuntu0.1.diff.gz
If somebody fixes the bug description, I'll upload it ubuntu; also feel
free to
cool, then what is left is somebody to rewrite the description following
the SRU template. I'll prepare the package and upload to a PPA for
everybody to test the change.
** Changed in: pdns-recursor (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because
Can anybody confirm this issue is not present in yakkety?
If so, I can do the actual SRU, but somebody else should 1) format this
bug according to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SRU 2) test the resulting
package.
** Also affects: pdns-recursor (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
Note that first and foremost it has to be fixed in the current
development release (zesty).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1634304
Title:
Unable to complete install: 'Couldn't find
** Also affects: virt-manager (Ubuntu Xenial)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: virt-manager (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: virt-manager (Ubuntu Zesty)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Dave Chiluk (chiluk)
A small review:
* all files I could see declare GPL-3 as license, not GPL-3+, but you are using
latter in d/copyright
* why are you disabling the tests? furthermore you're doing it only for 3.5;
are they going to be magically fixed for 3.6 which I assume is not so far?
* could you please use dh
This bug was fixed in the package multistrap - 2.2.7
---
multistrap (2.2.7) unstable; urgency=medium
* Since bash completion was moved away from /etc, invoke rm_conffile in
maintainer script (Thanks, Helmut Grohne)
-- Johannes Schauer Mon, 05 Dec 2016
Uploaded! :)
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1645234
Title:
[needs-packaging] needs packaging ubuntu-budgie-meta and
It can be done here. I added appropriate tasks.
If anybody wants to tackle it, feel free to.
Once ready (including the description of the bug to follow the SRU rules, and
be ready to test the package from proposed once uploaded) please
subscribe ubuntu-sponsors.
** Also affects: muon (Ubuntu
This bug was fixed in the package dm-writeboost - 2.2.6-1
Sponsored for Hans Joachim Desserud (hjd)
---
dm-writeboost (2.2.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium
* New upstream release [September 2016].
+ fixed FTBFS with Linux 4.8 (Closes: #838547).
-- Dmitry Smirnov
Right. I'm not convinced that it's _needed_ but it can be done indeed.
Though, I'm not personally up to sponsor it.
Besides, I'd rather see this bug only about the CVE; if anybody wants to
provide a minimal patch for it, and follow the SRU procedure (which includes
testing once it reaches
I don't see anything to sponsor left; there is an open task for xenial,
but no SRU patch (nor the description is ok).
I'm unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors; feel free to subscribe again if
anybody provides a SRU.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Tom, please update the bug following the wiki page jbicha linked.
In the meantime I'm ubsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors; please subscribe it
again when everything's ready.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Unsubscribing sponsors as there is really nothing to sponsor right now.
Feel free to subscribe again once there is a viable patch.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628247
Title:
Yes, please deal with this in Debian. Either adopt it, or do a QA
upload. I see you already turned the O into an ITA, great :)
Just file an RFS as usual to get sponsored there, making sure to also
add 'LP: #1614062' to the debian upload to also close this one bug with
that when the package is
2.2.4 from Debian Sid
+ Sync 2.2.6 from Debian Sid
** Changed in: multistrap (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Simon Quigley (tsimonq2) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
So, this bug affects only trusty.
The point is, during SRU you can't upgrade a package like redis to a whole new
upstream release, but rather you should cherry-pick the relevant patch (like
https://github.com/lamby/pkg-redis/commit/c2b56ef2d39bd681b3f98cd97354790ac19a1ce5).
See:
(unsubscribing ubuntu-sponsors; if any more sponsorship is needed please
subscribe it again)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1625072
Title:
lttng-modules 2.8.0-1 ADT test failure with
As for the past cases, I took care of filing a Debian bug about this:
https://bugs.debian.org/847093
+ uploaded, thank you!
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #847093
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=847093
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
unsubscribing sponsors; please re-subscribe it once ready.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1582930
Title:
psensor CPU usage jumps when graph window loses focus
To manage
I also sent a bug to debian (josch asked me so) to ask for inclusion of
those 2 example files; debbugs seems to have gone AWOL for today, so
dunno when i'll have a number.
BTW, when there are simple chnages like this, please consider to file a
bug in debian to ask for inclusion of the changes
+- Fix references to the host apt keyring
I don't see this in the debdiff, and if I looked correctly that change has been
incorporated in Debian too.
Do you confirm? If so, I'll just drop the line from the changelog and upload.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
also, josch just uploaded a new version a few seconds ago :)
While there, I also just asked him if he minded to include this remaining
change too, to allow for a sync.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
and also using a proper versioning for non-SRU uploads.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1612392
Title:
missing dependency on software-properties-kde
To manage notifications about
That's in git master indeed; but until that's also released and packaged it
should be a dependency.
I'm uploading your debdiff after doing s/UNRELEASED/zesty/.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
>From me it looks like you put the two commits from upstream in the same
patch file, while linking only one in the Orig field. Would you please
use two different patches? It's even easier, as you'd just be copying
the upstream commit.
Given that that fix is in upstream 1.1.5 I marked the bug as
Indeed that debian/dirs entry is useless, force-syncing the package.
** Changed in: fprint-demo (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
This bug was fixed in the package fprint-demo - 20080303git-6
---
fprint-demo (20080303git-6) unstable; urgency=medium
* Team upload.
* Bump debhelper compatibility to 9 and switch to dh sequences
- debian/patches/fix-ftbfs-hardening.patch: Fix the FTBFS due to the
would you please provide me with a debdiff against 2.2.4 as it's in
debian?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1647130
Title:
Merge 2.2.4 from Debian Sid
To manage notifications about
As Niels explained last year this is the expected behavior.
If you're rebuilding a package from Debian while targeting a Ubuntu release you
can as well change the target Distribution (and you're suppose to if you're
going to upload to Ubuntu, indeed the lintian message is totally right).
For
yep, works, great.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1586239
Title:
package hexchat-plugins 2.12.0-2ubuntu2 failed
here is a debdiff of the thing uploaded to yakkety.
** Patch added: "yakkety-debdiff.patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pbuilder/+bug/1640892/+attachment/4785384/+files/yakkety-debdiff.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Changed in: pbuilder (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: pbuilder (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1640892
This crash report is quite unactionable...
Looking at the stacktrace it seems to be cause by OpenSSL, but,...
Did it happen again? If this is reproducible in any way, would you
please install the debug symbols of hexchat openssl and all the other
relevant libraries and see if you can get
** Attachment removed: "JournalErrors.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hexchat/+bug/1611029/+attachment/4716810/+files/JournalErrors.txt
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
This is actually the same of lp #1575098 which has been fixed upstream by
https://github.com/hexchat/hexchat/commit/9f7444baa2001616f227ba9a442be824a57e56b9
Present in 2.12.0 in yakkety
** Changed in: hexchat (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification
** Information type changed from Private to Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1563907
Title:
hexchat crashed with SIGSEGV in __GI___libc_free()
To manage notifications about
This has already been fixed upstream
https://github.com/hexchat/hexchat/commit/9f7444baa2001616f227ba9a442be824a57e56b9
Present in 2.12.0 in yakkety
** Information type changed from Private to Public
** Changed in: hexchat (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug
Marked as fixed, as the fixed 2.12.0 is in yakkety even.
** Changed in: hexchat (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1328087
Title:
Alt +
> Is it a good thing to have a dynamic linked package untouched ? Maybe not.
>
> The source code and libraries may be the same version, the compiling process
> may have changed and trigger some oddities.
> I forced a reinstall of the package, let's see how it behaves now.
This shouldn't matter a
Attached what I'll upload to yakkety.
** Description changed:
+ [Impact]
+
+ * updating hexchat-plugins from xenial to yakkety (or to xenial to zesty,
fwiw) plain fails with a "trying to overwrite error"
+ * updates should work
+
+ [Test Case]
+
+ In xenial chroot:
+ * apt install
** Changed in: hexchat (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: hexchat (Ubuntu Zesty)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1586239
** Also affects: hexchat (Ubuntu Zesty)
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
Status: In Progress
** Also affects: hexchat (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: hexchat (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mat
** Changed in: hexchat (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Dimitri John Ledkov (xnox) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
** Changed in: hexchat (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I can't reproduce it with 0.226.1.
And apparently I made so many changes that I can't easily try to run 0.223 with
my .pbuilderrc that is taking advantage of some later changes (!) and I'm way
too lazy revert those changes...
Could you please try with a newer pbuilder? What you can get from
** Description changed:
The fix:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pbuilder/pbuilder.git/commit/?id=bf1acdc
[Impact]
The remove_packages() function in pbuilder-modules contains:
if (dpkg -s "$pkg" 2>&1)>/dev/null ; then
This obviously must
if ($CHROOTEXEC dpkg -s "$pkg"
** Description changed:
+ The fix:
+ https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pbuilder/pbuilder.git/commit/?id=bf1acdc
+
[Impact]
The remove_packages() function in pbuilder-modules contains:
- if (dpkg -s "$pkg" 2>&1)>/dev/null ; then
- This obviously must
- if ($CHROOTEXEC dpkg -s "$pkg"
Public bug reported:
The fix:
https://anonscm.debian.org/git/pbuilder/pbuilder.git/commit/?id=bf1acdc
[Impact]
The remove_packages() function in pbuilder-modules contains:
if (dpkg -s "$pkg" 2>&1)>/dev/null ; then
This obviously must
if ($CHROOTEXEC dpkg -s "$pkg" 2>&1)>/dev/null ; then
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. We are sorry that we do not always have the capacity to
look at all reported bugs in a timely manner. There have been many
changes in Ubuntu since that time you reported the bug and your problem
may have been fixed
> Depends: ia32-libs but it is not installable
also this is quite bad practice in 2016, we have had multi-arch for quite a
while.
OTOH they should just properly make their application to build and run natively
on amd64 without 32 bit libs.
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Debian closed this with 1.0.9-1, so this was clearly fixed in ubuntu too
when it was synced back in 2013.
** Changed in: svnmailer (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Package changed: ubuntu => inkscape (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: inkscape (Ubuntu)
Assignee: David R. Bild (drbild) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1417470
Title:
** Changed in: scribus (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1545493
Title:
Scribus always installs LibreOffice as dependency
To manage
"Read-only file system" — for sure not something due to libreoffice-
dictionaries.
Furthermore I don't understand your message (which is probably meant to
contain what you were trying to do when dpkg errored out).
I suggest you get in touch with the support people elsewhere.
yay!
(limnoria maintainer)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1587667
Title:
Import from Debian fails for source packages with included tarball
.asc
To manage notifications about this
I beg to say this is already the case. In Debian we're not doing
anything special to have libeatmydata be multi-arch safe, you just need
to install the library in a multi-arch location, specifying --libdir at
configure time.
** Changed in: libeatmydata
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You
this has just been fixed in debian in version 20160607-2, which will be
autosynced in ubuntu soon.
** Changed in: google-authenticator (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
with dpkg's xenial I can happily `dpkg-source -x` a package with a .asc
file. Indeed trusty and precise (?) need to be patched for them.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Laney poked dep11-gen and now scribus is visible in
{ubuntu,gnome}-software :)
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
the whole of Debian is not affected.
you should rather pin down single packages.
** Changed in: debian
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1541109
Title:
on
indeed, thus prodding Laney some more, then :)
in the meantime, keeping verification-needed until this can be confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575339
Title:
Gnome Software
** Changed in: libuser (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mattia Rizzolo (mapreri)
** Changed in: libuser (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1368106 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1368106
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1368106
package libuser 1:0.56.9.dfsg.1-1.2ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: trying
to overwrite '/usr/share/man/man1/lid.1.gz', which is also in package
in the meantime this has been fixed and synced.
** Changed in: libuser (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1210215
Title:
libuser:
this has been fixed with 1:0.60~dfsg-1.1 and 1:0.60~dfsg-1.2, already in
vivid.
** Changed in: libuser (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Description changed:
- The Scribus package cannot be installed using the Gnome Software
- application because it's missing the needed metadata.
+ [Impact]
+
+ * The Scribus package cannot be installed using the Gnome Software
+application because it's missing the needed metadata.
+
+
I suspects you have some kind of customization somewhere wrt MIME handling as
1. works on my main system
2. works on a clean VM
3. works for another guy I asked to test
Are you running on a clean xenial install?
** Changed in: scribus (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received
So, what I did was enough for yakkety, but it's not currently working
due to a regression on libappstream-glib (already reported).
** Changed in: scribus (Ubuntu Yakkety)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
801 - 900 of 1400 matches
Mail list logo