[Bug 1728031] Re: [SRU] Unable to change user password when ENFORCE_PASSWORD_CHECK is True

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Uploaded to Mantic. Build-tested on PPA [1] with -proposed enabled. [1] https://launchpad.net/~mfo/+archive/ubuntu/horizon- lp1728031-lp2054799-lp2055409/ ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In Pro

[Bug 1728031] Re: [SRU] Unable to change user password when ENFORCE_PASSWORD_CHECK is True

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Robie (comment #35), Good point; I added that to the Test Plan section to be safe. Even if that's already covered in automated testing, glitches or regressions in the web UI, if any, would likely be quickly spot by humans, despite passing tests. Thanks! ** Description changed: After followin

[Bug 2054799] Re: [SRU] Issue with Project administration at Cloud Admin level

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Uploaded to Mantic. Build-tested on PPA [1] with -proposed enabled. [1] https://launchpad.net/~mfo/+archive/ubuntu/horizon- lp1728031-lp2054799-lp2055409/ ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In Pro

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Uploaded to Mantic. Build-tested on PPA [1] with -proposed enabled. [1] https://launchpad.net/~mfo/+archive/ubuntu/horizon- lp1728031-lp2054799-lp2055409/ ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Mantic) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In Pro

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Slightly reformatted the Impact section and clarified the behavior change/extension with the opt-in config. ** Description changed: Setting the config option OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES to False successfully allows skipping neutron calls when loading the instance list page, the

[Bug 1728031] Re: [SRU] Unable to change user password when ENFORCE_PASSWORD_CHECK is True

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Uploaded to Noble. ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) -- You received

[Bug 2054799] Re: [SRU] Issue with Project administration at Cloud Admin level

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Uploaded to Noble. ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) -- You received

[Bug 1728031] Re: [SRU] Unable to change user password when ENFORCE_PASSWORD_CHECK is True

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Description changed: After following the security hardening guidelines: https://docs.openstack.org/security-guide/dashboard/checklist.html#check-dashboard-09-is-enforce-password-check-set-to-true After this check is enabled Check-Dashboard-09: Is ENFORCE_PASSWORD_CHECK set to True Th

[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Removed subscription of ubuntu-sponsors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054390 Title: Refine proc mounts entries traversal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs

[Bug 2054390] Re: Refine proc mounts entries traversal

2024-06-05 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
No, please ignore it for now; there's an issue/regression identified in the patch. ** Changed in: cryptsetup (Ubuntu Noble) Status: In Progress => Incomplete ** Changed in: cryptsetup (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: In Progress => Incomplete ** Changed in: cryptsetup (Ubuntu Jammy)

[Bug 1728031] Re: [SRU] Unable to change user password when ENFORCE_PASSWORD_CHECK is True

2024-06-04 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Fix Committed in oracular-proposed (horizon 4:24.0.0-0ubuntu2) [1]. Waiting on proposed-migration to oracular (mostly autopkgtests) [2]. If all goes well with oracular/development release, I will proceed with review/sponsorship to the stable releses (I can handle those). [1] https://launchpad.ne

[Bug 2054799] Re: [SRU] Issue with Project administration at Cloud Admin level

2024-06-04 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Fix Committed in oracular-proposed (horizon 4:24.0.0-0ubuntu2) [1]. Waiting on proposed-migration to oracular (mostly autopkgtests) [2]. If all goes well with oracular/development release, I will proceed with review/sponsorship to the stable releses (I can handle those). [1] https://launchpad.ne

[Bug 2054799] Re: [SRU] Issue with Project administration at Cloud Admin level

2024-06-04 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Description changed: [Impact] We are not able to see the list of users and groups assigned to a project in Horizon. [Test Case] Please refer to [Test steps] section below. [Regression Potential] The fix ed768ab is already in the upstream main, stable/2024.1, stabl

[Bug 1728031] Re: [SRU] Unable to change user password when ENFORCE_PASSWORD_CHECK is True

2024-06-04 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Oracular) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) -- You received this bug notification be

[Bug 2054799] Re: [SRU] Issue with Project administration at Cloud Admin level

2024-06-04 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Oracular) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: horizon (Ubuntu Oracular) Assignee: (unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) -- You received this bug notification be

[Bug 2061954] Re: filezilla crashed with SIGABRT in start_thread()

2024-06-04 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Marking as verification done for noble per comments 25, 26, 30, and 31 (requested in comment 24). Thanks! ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 2063820] Re: rtl8812au-dkms DKMS FTBFS wrt Linux 6.8

2024-06-04 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Paolo, thanks for the upload to oracular. This is now just pending the regular verification of noble-proposed (comment #4). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063820 Title: rtl8812au-dk

[Bug 2064914] Re: Windows guest hangs after reboot from the guest OS

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Björn, > @Mauricio as you can see the qemu version 6.2 is used in RHEL 8.5 too. > They integrated this patch two years ago. The QEMU project has this patch > since version 7.0. > I think it is well tested. Thanks for the reassurance of the code _change_ testing in RHEL and upstream! This is

[Bug 2064914] Re: Windows guest hangs after reboot from the guest OS

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Sergio, thanks for the updates to the bug description/SRU template. I've extended the Test Plan to cover not only boots, but reboots too, of course, which the patch changes/exercises (missed this previously); and Regression Potential, to point to the modified area (cpu reset). ** Description chan

[Bug 2064914] Please test proposed package

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello Björn, or anyone else affected, Accepted qemu into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.20 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://w

[Bug 2063112] Re: [arm64] autopkgtest - insufficient number of hugepages for all tests to succeed

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello Frode, or anyone else affected, Accepted openvswitch into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/3.3.0-1ubuntu3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See htt

[Bug 2063152] Re: [arm64] autopkgtest - some DPDK tests do not fit within CI memory constraints

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello Frode, or anyone else affected, Accepted openvswitch into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/3.3.0-1ubuntu3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See htt

[Bug 2066906] Please test proposed package

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello Frode, or anyone else affected, Accepted openvswitch into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/3.3.0-1ubuntu3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See htt

[Bug 2066906] Re: [noble] Missing fix for continuations with associated metering.

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Review feedback: - Versioning: It's standard practice that version string for stable releases are incremented by `ubuntu0.1`, and development release, by `ubuntu1` (please see [1]). This SRU/upload incremented by `ubuntu1`, but this was accepted previously (noble: ubuntu1, noble-proposed: ubuntu

[Bug 2066906] Re: [noble] Missing fix for continuations with associated metering.

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Added to the 'Regression Potential' an statement along the lines of the intended meaning 'Where problems could occur' [3], which relates to where/what the patch changes. Please amend/correct in case I missed something/misunderstood the patch; thanks! [3] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdat

[Bug 2066906] Re: [noble] Missing fix for continuations with associated metering.

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Marking devel/oracular as Fix Released (patch included): $ pull-lp-source openvswitch Found openvswitch 3.3.0-5 in oracular ... $ cd openvswitch-3.3.0 $ grep 'ofproto-dpif - continuation with meters' tests/ofproto-dpif.at AT_SETUP([ofproto-dpif - continuation with meters]) $ grep -A6 '^put_contr

[Bug 2066906] Re: [noble] Missing fix for continuations with associated metering.

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
This is arguably a reasonable combination (although with slight differences) of 'FTBFS' and 'Autopkgtest failures' (i.e., 'for successful build/test run') acceptable per SRU policy (included below), thus should not need staging. And even though this SRU (openvswitch) is directed at fixing/preventi

[Bug 2066908] Re: [SRU] ovn 24.03.2 point release

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Description changed: [Impact] This release sports mostly bug-fixes and we would like to make sure all of our supported customers have access to these improvements. The update contains the following package updates: -* ovn 24.03.2 +    * ovn 24.03.2 [Test Case] The follo

[Bug 2066906] Re: [noble] Missing fix for continuations with associated metering.

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Clarified/added '(Bug 2066908: [SRU] ovn 24.03.2 point release)' in the Impact section. ** Description changed: [ Impact ] There is a bug in Open vSwitch which is required for successful build and test run for OVN 24.03.2. + (Bug 2066908: [SRU] ovn 24.03.2 point release) [ Test plan ]

[Bug 2063112] Re: [arm64] autopkgtest - insufficient number of hugepages for all tests to succeed

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
For doc purposes (please clarify the tag change in the future, if at all possible :) `removed: block-proposed-noble`, see openvswitch 3.3.0-1ubuntu3 (including 3.3.0-1ubuntu2 above) in noble's unapproved queue; bug 2066906. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 2063152] Re: [arm64] autopkgtest - some DPDK tests do not fit within CI memory constraints

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
For doc purposes (please clarify the tag change in the future, if at all possible :) `removed: block-proposed-noble`, see openvswitch 3.3.0-1ubuntu3 (including 3.3.0-1ubuntu2 above) in noble's unapproved queue; bug 2066906. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 2066908] Re: [SRU] ovn 24.03.2 point release

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
SRU team: The upload in noble's unapproved queue (ovn 24.03.2-0ubuntu0.24.04.1) should only be accepted _after_ the openvswitch SRU for bug 2066906 is accepted, built, and available in noble-proposed (build-time dep): Per bug 2066906: 'There is a bug in Open vSwitch which is required for successf

[Bug 2063383] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu Unity takes 90 seconds to log out

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Simon, Just following up on this bug's failed verification (per above). Could you please clarify the next steps, when you have a chance? (e.g., an incremental fix to noble-proposed will be uploaded, or maybe the existing fix in noble-proposed should be removed if that may not happen soon; or t

[Bug 2042844] Re: JS ERROR: Gio.DBusError: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Failed: error occurred in AboutToShow

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification still pending for noble-proposed (blocks combined SRU release for bugs 2059818/done, 2059819/done, 2042844/needed) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042844 Title: JS ERROR

[Bug 2063401] Re: aardvark-dns fails to build

2024-06-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Adding bug task for Noble in Fix Committed as it's in noble-proposed (likewise for Oracular). $ rmadison -a source aardvark-dns | grep -e oracular -e noble aardvark-dns | 1.4.0-5| noble/universe | source aardvark-dns | 1.4.0-5| oracular/universe | source aar

[Bug 2054395] Re: [sru] sos upstream 4.7.0

2024-05-22 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Autopkgtests for oracular/cockpit/s390x passed with a retry, that should unblock the oracular-proposed migration shortly. 316-1build1 sosreport/4.7.0-0ubuntu12024-05-22 15:19:06 UTC 0h 04m 29s mfo pass 1bc3dca3-467e-430b-b336-fe8c1f19b6d5 -- You received this

[Bug 2064686] Re: Add "oracular" as a known Ubuntu distribution

2024-05-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The autopkgtests failures for mantic/jammy/focal have cleared up with retries. Proceeding with the release of these series. lintian [mantic/armhf] 2.116.3ubuntu3.2lintian/2.116.3ubuntu3.2 2024-05-20 22:46:45 UTC 0h 32m 13s mfo pass ef36

[Bug 2064686] Re: Add "oracular" as a known Ubuntu distribution

2024-05-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The verification for noble/mantic/jammy/focal look good; thanks! However, the autopkgtests failures for mantic/jammy/focal aren't clear. I retried them, as apparently they are infrastructure related timeouts/issues. I'll check later if still on shift. -- You received this bug notification becaus

[Bug 2064686] Update Released

2024-05-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The verification of the Stable Release Update for lintian has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a

[Bug 2060745] Update Released

2024-05-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The verification of the Stable Release Update for nbd has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regr

[Bug 2060745] Re: nbd-client fails to connect Error: Socket failed: Connection refused

2024-05-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verificaton done on noble-proposed. Thanks for the detailed test steps! (I updated the last command from 'nbd-client -d nbd0' to 'nbd-client nbd0', which reflects the test step without the fix, in 'Now, trigger the problem'). Environment: --- lxc launch ubuntu:noble --vm mfo-noble-vm lxc shell m

[Bug 2060745] Re: nbd-client fails to connect Error: Socket failed: Connection refused

2024-05-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Description changed: [ Impact ] nbdtab uses a port of 0 by default which is not sensible. This means that if you do not set a default port in nbdtab, it will fail. You will see an error such as: Error: Socket failed: Connection refused [ Test Plan ] $ lxc launch ubuntu:n

[Bug 2063820] Re: rtl8812au-dkms DKMS FTBFS wrt Linux 6.8

2024-05-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
This SRU is blocked on the upload to the Development Release, as per [1] (comment #2). If that is not possible or needed, please explain. Marking Oracular as Incomplete. Thanks! [1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Development_Release_Fixed_First ** Changed in: rtl8812au (Ubuntu Ora

[Bug 2062177] Update Released

2024-05-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The verification of the Stable Release Update for remmina has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a

[Bug 2063383] Re: [SRU] Ubuntu Unity takes 90 seconds to log out

2024-05-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Marking this SRU as verification-failed per comments - #4 (partial failure with applications running) and - #5 (failure even without applications running). The partial failure would seem like a regression too, since the bug description says that the fix / change acts 'effectively and immediately'

[Bug 2042844] Re: JS ERROR: Gio.DBusError: GDBus.Error:org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Failed: error occurred in AboutToShow

2024-05-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification pending for noble-proposed (blocks combined SRU release for bugs 2059818, 2059819, 2042844) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2042844 Title: JS ERROR: Gio.DBusError: GDBus

[Bug 2059819] Re: Regression: Jammy to Noble, right clicking on some icons shows dropdown on left side of screen

2024-05-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification pending for noble-proposed (blocks combined SRU release for bugs 2059818, 2059819, 2042844) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059819 Title: Regression: Jammy to Noble, righ

[Bug 2061214] Re: [SRU] Software Sources is not compatible with deb822

2024-05-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
This SRU is pending verification for noble-proposed and autopkgtests regressions to be cleared up. I looked the autopkgtests regressions, and some seem to be temporary conditions on the infrastructure, thus I just triggered retries for all tests/archs. -- You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 2061747] Re: obsolete out-of-tree ivsc dkms in favor of in-tree one

2024-05-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
This SRU is pending clarification about the verification tags flip (comments 23, 12, 7) and other questions (comment 23). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061747 Title: obsolete out-of

[Bug 2054799] Re: [SRU] Issue with Project administration at Cloud Admin level

2024-05-18 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Attaching the error image linked in the bug description for archival purposes: """ Expectation: Get a table with the users assigned to this project. Result: Get an error - https://i.imgur.com/TminwUy.png [attached] """ ** Attachment added: "TminwUy.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sour

[Bug 2054799] Re: [SRU] Issue with Project administration at Cloud Admin level

2024-05-18 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Commit ed768ab50713 (proposed for Ubuntu SRUs & Cloud Archive) isn't in Oracular yet, IIUIC; adding bug task. master $ git log --oneline -1 ed768ab ed768ab50713 Fix Users/Groups tab list when a domain context is set stable/2024.1 $ git log --oneline origin/stable/2024.1

[Bug 2055409] Re: [SRU] config OPENSTACK_INSTANCE_RETRIEVE_IP_ADDRESSES does not apply to instance detail page

2024-05-18 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Adding bug tasks for Noble/Oracular as Fix Released, for clarity, per comment #2 and checks below. $ git log --oneline -1 95089025fda7c8cce6f7195e2a63f7f09efc9e0a 95089025fda7 Extend configurable skippability of neutron calls to project instance detail $ git describe --contains 95089025fda7 24.0

[Bug 1728031] Re: [SRU] Unable to change user password when ENFORCE_PASSWORD_CHECK is True

2024-05-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Patch [1] (proposed for Ubuntu SRUs & Cloud Archive) isn't in Oracular/Noble yet, IIUIC; adding bug tasks. $ git log --oneline -- openstack_dashboard/api/keystone.py | grep -m1 'Fix error on changing user password by admin' da8e95929857 Fix error on changing user password by admin

[Bug 1901742] Re: systemd-modules-load.service fails to start because it can't understand module arguments in /etc/modules, which it shouldn't even be reading

2024-05-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Marking Bionic as Won't Fix as it's End of Standard Support (EOSS), and in Expanded Security Maintenance (ESM). If you have an Ubuntu Pro subscription with Support, and would like a fix, please open a support ticket. ** Tags removed: sts-sponsor-volunteer ** Changed in: kmod (Ubuntu Bionic)

[Bug 1875669] Re: autopkgtest failures

2024-05-17 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Tags removed: sts-sponsor-volunteer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875669 Title: autopkgtest failures To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubu

[Bug 2064580] Re: Please update the package to 20240320.00

2024-05-14 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Oh, and Oracular indeed just migrated while I posted the comment (#21 #22); nice timing. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064580 Title: Please update the package to 20240320.00 To man

[Bug 2064580] Update Released

2024-05-14 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The verification of the Stable Release Update for google-osconfig-agent has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that y

[Bug 2064580] Re: Please update the package to 20240320.00

2024-05-14 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Summary for SRU release. Autopkgtests: OK - Devel/O: proposed migration was blocked in a test queued since early May; re-triggered it and it passed; this should migrate soon. - Stable/NMJF: re-triggered/cleared autopkgtests pending; all series/archs passed. Builds/FTBFS: OK - Focal/riscv64: fai

[Bug 1988366] Re: python-rtslib-fb needs to handle new attribute cpus_allowed_list

2024-05-13 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Robie, Sergio, The concern about removing 'version_attributes' and 'discovery_auth_attributes' can be addressed with this simple change/backport. What do you think? Don't remove the 2 attributes / move elements into 'target_name_excloudes'. Instead, add a new attribute / its element into 'ta

[Bug 2015017] Re: [SRU] scaling is wrong in SVG output

2024-05-13 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
To be clear, I don't think these should block the acceptance of this SRU (I have seen different criteria to accept SRUs regarding DEP-3 headers), but hopefully might be of some value for future SRUs, if you agree w/ it. I'll refrain from accepting it for now as oracular-proposed seems to have some

[Bug 2015017] Re: [SRU] scaling is wrong in SVG output

2024-05-13 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Dave (~waveform), Thanks for all the work to review/sponsor this fix! (And several others!) It's really appreciated. In a comparatively small but relevant note, I'd like to humbly point out though that some DEP-3 headers seem incorrect (IMHO) in the uploads AFAICT based in [1] (section `Standa

[Bug 1921914] Re: [SRU] package quickml 0.7-5.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed quickml package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-05-13 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Rejected from the unapproved queues for Noble, Mantic, Jammy, and Focal per comment #14. Thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1921914 Title: [SRU] package quickml 0.7-5.1 failed to

[Bug 2064914] Re: Windows guest hangs after reboot from the guest OS

2024-05-13 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Sergio, Thanks for the upload! The bug and fix sound good and relatively simple to verify. The SRU bug template is still missing Test Plan / Regression Potential, so I'll mark it as Incomplete for the time being (I see it may be coming soon, per "TBD"). While looking at the Björn's mention o

[Bug 2064580] Re: Please update the package to 20240320.00

2024-05-13 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Chlo, thanks for the updates to the SRU template. 'Where problems could occur' is indeed generic as can be expected for such a big update, but the information there is certainly helpful. The one point/patch that applies to Ubuntu more directly in the big update (comment #5) is a gpg/apt change [

[Bug 2064580] Re: Please update the package to 20240320.00

2024-05-13 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Utkarsh, Thanks for the pointer to the dependency changes as requested by the SRU exception, and update to the bug template. I had seen that in the diff (and filter it out, per the size, of course), but I think what the request in the SRU exception is, is something easier to parse re: the vers

[Bug 2064580] Please test proposed package

2024-05-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello Philip, or anyone else affected, Accepted google-osconfig-agent into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-osconfig- agent/20240320.00-0ubuntu1~22.04.0 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us b

[Bug 2064580] Please test proposed package

2024-05-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello Philip, or anyone else affected, Accepted google-osconfig-agent into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-osconfig- agent/20240320.00-0ubuntu1~20.04.0 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us b

[Bug 2064580] Re: Please update the package to 20240320.00

2024-05-07 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The uploads for Jammy and Focal follow Oracular's too, with additional changes to use a newer go version, as already done in Focal (J: any > 1.21; F: 1.18 > 1.21). Please address the SRU-related requests in comment #7. Thanks! ** Changed in: google-osconfig-agent (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: Ne

[Bug 2064580] Re: Please update the package to 20240320.00

2024-05-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The uploads for Noble and Mantic follow Oracular's as expected (#5), the only differences being timestamps and a securiy patch in Mantic. The code changes look good AFAICT, and the vendored deps changes are such in size that require validation by testing. Please address the request in comment #6

[Bug 2064580] Please test proposed package

2024-05-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello Philip, or anyone else affected, Accepted google-osconfig-agent into mantic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-osconfig- agent/20240320.00-0ubuntu1~23.10.0 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us

[Bug 2064580] Please test proposed package

2024-05-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hello Philip, or anyone else affected, Accepted google-osconfig-agent into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/google-osconfig- agent/20240320.00-0ubuntu1~24.04.0 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us b

[Bug 2064580] Re: Please update the package to 20240320.00

2024-05-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
It looks like the uploads are coming in (noble 25 mins ago, mantic 16 mins ago). After your code/package-wise tasks are done, could you please take a look at listing the vendorized deps changes, as per SRU exception? I realize that might be a lot, but it's in the exception, so it must be asked f

[Bug 2064580] Re: Please update the package to 20240320.00

2024-05-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Updating the Oracular bug task to Fix Committed, as the reference to this bug is already in oracular-proposed [1]. The Oracular Oriole (active development) 20240320.00-0ubuntu1proposed (main) 9 hours ago Changelog google-osconfig-agent (20240320.00-0ubuntu1) o

[Bug 2064580] Re: Please update the package to 20240320.00

2024-05-06 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
This bug received a prioritization request for SRU review. Unfortunately, apparently the uploads for stable releases haven't happened today so far (but I will check tomorrow). Meanwhile, I have familiarized myself with the upload for Oracular, which is expected to be quite similar to stable relea

[Bug 1988942] Re: Failed to set image property. Invalid input for field/attribute simplestreams_metadata. Value: ... is too long (HTTP 400)

2024-05-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Jorge, Thanks for testing and the update. Re: mantic-proposed, that is weird; any mirrors in place? It looks OK in the archive: (All cinder binary packages were available in the verification of bug 1987663.) $ curl -s http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/mantic-proposed/main/binary-amd64/

[Bug 2038249] Re: The dump file parsing issue arises from structural changes in Linux kernel 6.2

2024-05-03 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Timo, Thanks for looking into this. > Wouldn't it be less risky to just backport 8.0.4 instead of 24/36 commits to mantic/jammy? So so; and there's more involved. There are near-future steps being taken in that direction already (SRU exception to be discussed in the upcoming Engineering Spri

[Bug 1988942] Re: Failed to set image property. Invalid input for field/attribute simplestreams_metadata. Value: ... is too long (HTTP 400)

2024-04-30 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Jorge, Thanks for verifying jammy-proposed. Could you please verify mantic-proposed as well? The fix release to jammy-updates depends on release for mantic-updates (ie, verification of mantic-proposed). Thanks again! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1987663] Re: cinder-volume: "Failed to re-export volume, setting to ERROR" with "tgtadm: failed to send request hdr to tgt daemon, Transport endpoint is not connected" on service startup

2024-04-30 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification done on {mantic,jammy,focal}-proposed. The detailed verification steps as per comment #3 are attached. This is the summary with key steps. With the packages from -proposed, when (re)starting {cinder-volume,tgt}.service, the cinder-volume service is started _after_ the tgt service,

[Bug 2063221] Re: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package

2024-04-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The updates look good, thanks! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063221 Title: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 2052985] Re: [SRU] Upgrade Rust to 1.76.0

2024-04-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Changed in: rustc (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052985 Title: [SRU] Upgrade Rust to 1.76.0 To manage notifications about this bug go to

[Bug 2063221] Re: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package

2024-04-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Jeremy, This looks mostly good, AFAICT. Could you please complete the SRU bug template by adding the section 'Where problems could occur' / 'Regression potential'? [1] And although the 'Test Case' is feasible to understand, based on the 'Impact' section, it would be nice to have a 'functiona

[Bug 2063221] Re: Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package

2024-04-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
I tested this with a local package build and local repo in a mantic container, doing an `apt --dry-run dist-upgrade` without/with that repo (w/ noble apt sources list), and manually download/run noble's release upgrader without/with that repo. The behavior is the same (ie, no regressions) as expe

[Bug 2061891] Re: Noble upgrade breaks iptables-persistent and netfilter-persistent usage

2024-04-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Ok; thanks for clarifying. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061891 Title: Noble upgrade breaks iptables-persistent and netfilter-persistent usage To manage notifications about this

[Bug 2063464] Re: systemd-resolved wasn't installed on upgrade from Jammy to Noble

2024-04-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Moving from Fix Committed back to In Progress as this isn't in -proposed yet, and In Progress reflects 'uploaded' better. (I don't mean to be pedantic, but this avoids confusion; even though the git repo was mentioned, AFAIK the 'Ubuntu' project in bug tasks means the status Fix Committed should b

[Bug 2064090] Re: Automatically installed bit not transitioned to t64 libraries

2024-04-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Moving from Fix Committed back to In Progress as this isn't in -proposed yet, and In Progress reflects 'uploaded' better. (I don't mean to be pedantic, but this avoids confusion; even though the git repo was mentioned, AFAIK the 'Ubuntu' project in bug tasks means the status Fix Committed should b

[Bug 2061891] Re: Noble upgrade breaks iptables-persistent and netfilter-persistent usage

2024-04-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Nick and Julian, Thanks for the fix and SRU template! Question: IIUIC, the fix simply removes 'ufw' if '{iptables,netfilter}-persistent' is installed. But is it possible that removing ufw is the wrong thing to do in some particular case? Say, if the user actually used/configured ufw inste

[Bug 2061891] Re: Noble upgrade breaks iptables-persistent and netfilter-persistent usage

2024-04-29 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Description changed: - [Impact / Original Description] + [Impact] + ufw and -persistent packages both manage the firewall, hence they conflict but they accidentally had no conflicts in jammy. If both are installed, persistent packages will store and restore firewall configuration, so ufw can

[Bug 1989078] Re: libvirt-qemu apparmor profile doesn't allow locking of AAVMF firmware

2024-04-24 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Updating the verification tags for the new version, agreeing with Christian's assessment in comment 12, and verifying that the changes are still included: $ pull-lp-debs -a arm64 libvirt-daemon-system focal 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.20 $ dpkg-deb -x libvirt-daemon-system_6.0.0-0ubuntu8.20_arm64.deb deb $ fgr

[Bug 2059272] Re: libvirt domain is not listed/managed after libvirt restart with messages "internal error: no monitor path" and "Failed to load config for domain"

2024-04-24 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
The packages in focal-proposed have also been verified successfully in real-world/non-synthetic tests by one of our Ubuntu Pro support customers. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059272

[Bug 2059272] Re: libvirt domain is not listed/managed after libvirt restart with messages "internal error: no monitor path" and "Failed to load config for domain"

2024-04-24 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Verification done on focal-proposed, following comments 23, 24, 25, 26. Including in this comment a few key snippets from each test/comment. --- Environment --- LXD virtual machine lxc launch --vm ubuntu:focal lp2059272-focal lxc exec lp2059272-focal -- su - ubuntu Enable proposed & debug sy

[Bug 2048517] Re: EPYC-Rome model without XSAVES may break live migration since the removal of the flag on the physical CPU

2024-04-24 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
(unassigned) => Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) ** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu) Assignee: Sergio Durigan Junior (sergiodj) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048517 Ti

[Bug 2048517] Re: EPYC-Rome model without XSAVES may break live migration since the removal of the flag on the physical CPU

2024-04-22 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Giuseppe, Please test nova version 2:21.2.4-0ubuntu2.7~ppa3 in the PPA. (It's finished building and should be published in some time.) The config change should be something along the lines of `cpu_model_extra_flags = -xsaves` I couldn't test the package/functionality yet, but all of the bui

[Bug 2048517] Re: EPYC-Rome model without XSAVES may break live migration since the removal of the flag on the physical CPU

2024-04-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hmm, sorry, please hold; the unit tests caught an error. I'll check that on Monday. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048517 Title: EPYC-Rome model without XSAVES may break live migrati

[Bug 2038249] Re: The dump file parsing issue arises from structural changes in Linux kernel 6.2

2024-04-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Mantic and Jammy built successfully in all supported architectures. (riscv64 fails, but it also fails on mantic/jammy-release; it's OK.) Uploaded! Thanks -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Bug 2048517] Re: EPYC-Rome model without XSAVES may break live migration since the removal of the flag on the physical CPU

2024-04-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Hi Giuseppe, You're right, libvirt checks the specified model against its known models. However, the EPYC-Rome (not-v4) doesn't specify 'xsaves', just EPYC-Milan, so it _seems_ the feature came from the default with cpu_model host-model, which perhaps found EPYC Milan model closer to the host fla

[Bug 2038249] Re: The dump file parsing issue arises from structural changes in Linux kernel 6.2

2024-04-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Description changed: [Impact] - Linux kernel 6.2 includes patches with structural changes that may render the crash utility unable to parse the dump file. + Linux kernel 6.2 includes patches with structural changes that may render the crash utility in Mantic (release kernel 6.5) and Jammy (

[Bug 2038249] Re: The dump file parsing issue arises from structural changes in Linux kernel 6.2

2024-04-20 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Jammy: patches 0001-0012 look good too! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038249 Title: The dump file parsing issue arises from structural changes in Linux kernel 6.2 To manage notif

[Bug 2038249] Re: The dump file parsing issue arises from structural changes in Linux kernel 6.2

2024-04-19 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Partial review of the Jammy debdiff. (Still in progress.) Started with Jammy's patches 0012-0036, which are Mantic's patches 0001-0024 (already reviewed). Most patches are identical, and some have context-line changes, as expected (8.0.2/8.0.0 delta). Just had a few changes. $ for ((i=1; i<=24;

[Bug 2038249] Re: The dump file parsing issue arises from structural changes in Linux kernel 6.2

2024-04-19 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
Today, I tackled the Mantic debdiff (made only a few changes; below). It's now currently building in a PPA for all supported architectures, (ppa:mfo/lp2038249) and if all goes well I will upload it to Mantic. Thanks! Mauricio --- All 24 commits are included in Noble (12 in 8.0.4 and 12 in 8.0.3

[Bug 2038249] Re: The dump file parsing issue arises from structural changes in Linux kernel 6.2

2024-04-19 Thread Mauricio Faria de Oliveira
** Description changed: [Impact] Linux kernel 6.2 includes patches with structural changes that may render the crash utility unable to parse the dump file. == d122019bf061 mm: Split slab into its own type 401fb12c68c2 mm: Differentiate struct slab fields by sl*b implementations

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >