[Bug 2055003] Re: Qemu cmdline core dumped with more(8193 or more) cpus

2024-02-26 Thread Michael Tokarev
FWIW, this bug tracker is not used for qemu for a long time. See https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/ instead. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055003 Title: Qemu cmdline core

[Bug 128548] Re: Enable net usershare?

2022-05-03 Thread Michael Tokarev
Hi here! What's the reason here to change the compile-time default value for the usershare max shares (from 0 to 100) instead of just letting the admin to configure this feature if they wants to? It is just a flip of a single parameter in smb.conf. I for one have to disable this debian-enabled

[Bug 1961645] Re: QEMU packages have circular dependencies

2022-02-21 Thread Michael Tokarev
Oh wow!!! :) Just as I said, q-b-e should also list qemu-utils as one of the alternatives. This is the problem here, not the long list of other alternatives you're trying to remove, but the single alternative - qemu- utils - which is missing here. This one I'll fix right away. That's really an

[Bug 1961645] Re: QEMU packages have circular dependencies

2022-02-21 Thread Michael Tokarev
Actually this is fixed quite long time ago (but not in any released stable version), in this commit: commit 15bf92b50ca51e078575587bf0f26085d1ecbf88 Author: Michael Tokarev Date: Wed Aug 18 16:43:23 2021 +0300 d/control: reformat Depends for qemu-block-extra, do not include -xen version

[Bug 1961645] Re: QEMU packages have circular dependencies

2022-02-21 Thread Michael Tokarev
nope, you're wrong. qemu-block-extra is a set of plugins. This package is useless without one of the other binary packages which can load these plugins. This is one of qemu-system-foo, AND qemu-utils - that's the set of packages q-b-e should depend on in order to actually work. And speaking of

[Bug 1840956] Re: qemu-user-static fails to install in WSL and LXD

2020-01-14 Thread Michael Tokarev
FWIW, it looks to me that this issue is ought to be fixed in binfmt package, not in all of its users.. This is a general issue for containers, not only qemu is affected -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1350435] Re: tcg.c:1693: tcg fatal error

2015-09-24 Thread Michael Tokarev
Well. This is definitely wrong. It is a valid bug, but it needs quite serious work to fix, which requires major refactoring of the tcg code. Upstream is working on it, see http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/tcg- multithread ** Changed in: qemu Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- You received

[Bug 1350435] Re: tcg.c:1693: tcg fatal error

2015-09-24 Thread Michael Tokarev
Well. This is definitely wrong. It is a valid bug, but it needs quite serious work to fix, which requires major refactoring of the tcg code. Upstream is working on it, see http://wiki.qemu.org/Features/tcg- multithread ** Changed in: qemu Status: Invalid => Confirmed -- You received

[Bug 1025244] Re: qcow2 image increasing disk size above the virtual limit

2014-12-14 Thread Michael Tokarev
Looking at what? At the lack of problems as comment #14 says? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025244 Title: qcow2 image increasing disk size above the virtual

[Bug 1025244] Re: qcow2 image increasing disk size above the virtual limit

2014-12-14 Thread Michael Tokarev
Looking at what? At the lack of problems as comment #14 says? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1025244 Title: qcow2 image increasing disk size above the virtual limit To manage

[Bug 921208] Re: win7/x64 installer hangs on startup with 0x0000005d.

2014-11-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
I'm not sure I follow. I tried to answer to the last inquiry in this bugreport, Eduardo asked if someone can confirm that +nx solves this problem (it doesn't). Now you say with certainity that it is a bug in TCG (if it is a bug, why only uncertain guesses are present in this bugreport?),

[Bug 921208] Re: win7/x64 installer hangs on startup with 0x0000005d.

2014-11-01 Thread Michael Tokarev
I'm not sure I follow. I tried to answer to the last inquiry in this bugreport, Eduardo asked if someone can confirm that +nx solves this problem (it doesn't). Now you say with certainity that it is a bug in TCG (if it is a bug, why only uncertain guesses are present in this bugreport?),

[Bug 921208] Re: win7/x64 installer hangs on startup with 0x0000005d.

2014-10-31 Thread Michael Tokarev
This prob is still present in current (2.1) qemu, and it is NOT solved by -cpu kvm64,+nx -- win bluescreens the same way. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921208 Title:

[Bug 921208] Re: win7/x64 installer hangs on startup with 0x0000005d.

2014-10-31 Thread Michael Tokarev
I tried running qemu-system-x86 -cpu qemu64 with tcg and kvm, and compared cpu flags. There are 2 flags present in kvm case which are not present in tcg case: de and x2apic, all other flags are identical (nx is present in both). But enabling these two flags explicitly does not help, win still

[Bug 921208] Re: win7/x64 installer hangs on startup with 0x0000005d.

2014-10-31 Thread Michael Tokarev
This prob is still present in current (2.1) qemu, and it is NOT solved by -cpu kvm64,+nx -- win bluescreens the same way. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921208 Title: win7/x64

[Bug 921208] Re: win7/x64 installer hangs on startup with 0x0000005d.

2014-10-31 Thread Michael Tokarev
I tried running qemu-system-x86 -cpu qemu64 with tcg and kvm, and compared cpu flags. There are 2 flags present in kvm case which are not present in tcg case: de and x2apic, all other flags are identical (nx is present in both). But enabling these two flags explicitly does not help, win still

[Bug 1317090] Re: qemu fails on ELF files with no section headers

2014-08-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
Hmm. Speaking of wrong executables. We have another bugreport in debian, -- https://bugs.debian.org/754336 -- which might be related. But I tried qemu-2.1-rc and it didn't run these binaries. Is it not the same thing? (The debian bugreport has sample files attached). ** Bug watch added:

[Bug 1317090] Re: qemu fails on ELF files with no section headers

2014-08-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
Hmm. Speaking of wrong executables. We have another bugreport in debian, -- https://bugs.debian.org/754336 -- which might be related. But I tried qemu-2.1-rc and it didn't run these binaries. Is it not the same thing? (The debian bugreport has sample files attached). ** Bug watch added:

[Bug 1295072] Re: qemu 1.7 should build-depend on libfdt-dev higher than 1.4.0

2014-04-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
It looks like libfte-dev before 1.4 was merely unusable because the mentioned file - libfdt_env.h - is included by the main libfdt.h too, even in version 1.3, so if libfdt_env.h is missing, libfdt-dev is simply unusable. At least that's what it was on debian, see http://bugs.debian.org/706137 .

[Bug 1295072] Re: qemu 1.7 should build-depend on libfdt-dev higher than 1.4.0

2014-04-08 Thread Michael Tokarev
It looks like libfte-dev before 1.4 was merely unusable because the mentioned file - libfdt_env.h - is included by the main libfdt.h too, even in version 1.3, so if libfdt_env.h is missing, libfdt-dev is simply unusable. At least that's what it was on debian, see http://bugs.debian.org/706137 .

[Bug 1022222] Re: vgabios need support DDC EDID

2013-12-16 Thread Michael Tokarev
FWIW, Debian (upstream qemu following) now finally switched to vgabios from seabios (so bochs lgpl vgabios isn't used anymore), and seavgabios now have the resolutions mentioned - it looks like we've added these based on the patch for bochs vgabios mentioned here. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1022222] Re: vgabios need support DDC EDID

2013-12-16 Thread Michael Tokarev
FWIW, Debian (upstream qemu following) now finally switched to vgabios from seabios (so bochs lgpl vgabios isn't used anymore), and seavgabios now have the resolutions mentioned - it looks like we've added these based on the patch for bochs vgabios mentioned here. -- You received this bug

[Bug 1246990] Re: [qemu-x86-64-linux-user 1.6.1] qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (Segmentation fault) - core dumped

2013-11-03 Thread Michael Tokarev
I'm not sure x86*-linux-user targets are being tested at all. Last time I checked, x86-64 variant crashed left and right to the point of being completely unusable... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu in Ubuntu.

[Bug 1246990] Re: [qemu-x86-64-linux-user 1.6.1] qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (Segmentation fault) - core dumped

2013-11-03 Thread Michael Tokarev
I'm not sure x86*-linux-user targets are being tested at all. Last time I checked, x86-64 variant crashed left and right to the point of being completely unusable... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1178884] Re: unhelpful kvm error msg thrown when cache=none and no direct IO

2013-10-11 Thread Michael Tokarev
doesn't qemu itself print an error message in this case before exiting? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1178884 Title: unhelpful kvm error msg thrown when cache=none

[Bug 1178884] Re: unhelpful kvm error msg thrown when cache=none and no direct IO

2013-10-11 Thread Michael Tokarev
doesn't qemu itself print an error message in this case before exiting? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1178884 Title: unhelpful kvm error msg thrown when cache=none and no direct IO

[Bug 1033727] Re: USB passthrough doesn't work anymore with qemu-kvm 1.1.1

2013-01-14 Thread Michael Tokarev
Thank you very much Peter for the work you did. That is not of historic interest, not at all - it is of a good value for Debian users! And thank you Nikolaus for the testing, as well! I take your (both of you!) words that the problem is now solved, and am uploading new release to debian

[Bug 1033727] Re: USB passthrough doesn't work anymore with qemu-kvm 1.1.1

2013-01-14 Thread Michael Tokarev
Thank you very much Peter for the work you did. That is not of historic interest, not at all - it is of a good value for Debian users! And thank you Nikolaus for the testing, as well! I take your (both of you!) words that the problem is now solved, and am uploading new release to debian

[Bug 1033727] Re: USB passthrough doesn't work anymore with qemu-kvm 1.1.1

2013-01-12 Thread Michael Tokarev
Peter, are you able to run git bisect or something like that, to try to pinpoint either the commit which introduced this issue or which fixed it? I tried to reproduce this issue several times with various devices, but I can't do it reliable, it always more or less works on my machine. If I were

[Bug 1033727] Re: USB passthrough doesn't work anymore with qemu-kvm 1.1.1

2013-01-12 Thread Michael Tokarev
Peter, are you able to run git bisect or something like that, to try to pinpoint either the commit which introduced this issue or which fixed it? I tried to reproduce this issue several times with various devices, but I can't do it reliable, it always more or less works on my machine. If I were

[Bug 658610] Re: Check whether images have write permissions

2012-10-27 Thread Michael Tokarev
So closing it with fix released. (which had a complication for me: I changed status for ubuntu package instead of changing it for qemu line, and now I can't restore it back for ubuntu - since I don't know how/when ubuntu bugs are closed, only upstream) ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu)

[Bug 611142] Re: seabios should have native scsi support

2012-10-26 Thread Michael Tokarev
FWIW, this is implemented and works in seabios 0.7.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611142 Title: seabios should have native scsi support To manage notifications

[Bug 658610] Re: Check whether images have write permissions

2012-10-26 Thread Michael Tokarev
by default images are expected to be open read-write. I'm against too much intelligence here, -- we may be running qemu as wrong user, or with wrong permissions of the image in question, and qemu should fail to start if the image can't be open using specified access flags (which is read-write by

[Bug 1030610] Re: qemu-kvm depends on undesirable additional packages

2012-10-26 Thread Michael Tokarev
There has been numerous reports/wishlists about removing features from qemu. Different people consider different features to be undesirable. But this is not how debian/ubuntu works: on these systems, packages are built with as much as possible features (and hence external dependencies). If you

[Bug 611142] Re: seabios should have native scsi support

2012-10-26 Thread Michael Tokarev
FWIW, this is implemented and works in seabios 0.7.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611142 Title: seabios should have native scsi support To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 658610] Re: Check whether images have write permissions

2012-10-26 Thread Michael Tokarev
by default images are expected to be open read-write. I'm against too much intelligence here, -- we may be running qemu as wrong user, or with wrong permissions of the image in question, and qemu should fail to start if the image can't be open using specified access flags (which is read-write by

[Bug 1030610] Re: qemu-kvm depends on undesirable additional packages

2012-10-26 Thread Michael Tokarev
There has been numerous reports/wishlists about removing features from qemu. Different people consider different features to be undesirable. But this is not how debian/ubuntu works: on these systems, packages are built with as much as possible features (and hence external dependencies). If you

[Bug 918791] Re: qemu-kvm dies when using vmvga driver and unity in the guest

2012-07-07 Thread Michael Tokarev
if x or y 0, set them to 0 (and decrement with/height accordingly) If it is possible in this context to have negative x or y, it is also possible to have them larger than width and heigth by absolute value, so that when decrementing width/height accordingly, width/height becomes negative too.

[Bug 930181] Re: qemu-kvm (1.0+noroms-0ubuntu4) fails to build on Ubuntu Precise locally

2012-04-17 Thread Michael Tokarev
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #668186 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668186 ** Also affects: qemu-kvm (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=668186 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 803246] Re: di syslog lines truncated

2011-10-30 Thread Michael Tokarev
busybox syslogd truncates input lines at 255 bytes. There's debian bug report about this, #519356. In debian, we consider it is a documentation bug, but indeed, it may be possible to increase buffer size a bit. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #519356

[Bug 524447] Re: virsh save is very slow

2011-07-28 Thread Michael Tokarev
I see activity around this bug is going on and on, but I don't understand -- is the talk about this patch -- http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/qemu-kvm.git;a=commit;h=7e32b4ca0ea280a2e8f4d9ace1a15d5e633d9a95 ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 524447] Re: virsh save is very slow

2011-07-28 Thread Michael Tokarev
I just wanted to point out that we've this patch in Debian since ages, and it's been included in upstream for a long time too. Added a debbug reference for this as well. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #597517 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597517 ** Also affects:

[Bug 524447] Re: virsh save is very slow

2011-07-28 Thread Michael Tokarev
I see activity around this bug is going on and on, but I don't understand -- is the talk about this patch -- http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=collab-maint/qemu-kvm.git;a=commit;h=7e32b4ca0ea280a2e8f4d9ace1a15d5e633d9a95 ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 524447] Re: virsh save is very slow

2011-07-28 Thread Michael Tokarev
I just wanted to point out that we've this patch in Debian since ages, and it's been included in upstream for a long time too. Added a debbug reference for this as well. ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #597517 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=597517 ** Also affects:

[Bug 697197] Re: Empty password allows access to VNC in libvirt

2011-04-26 Thread Michael Tokarev
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #611134 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611134 ** Also affects: qemu-kvm (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611134 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 697197] Re: Empty password allows access to VNC in libvirt

2011-04-26 Thread Michael Tokarev
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #611134 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611134 ** Also affects: qemu-kvm (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=611134 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 741887] Re: virsh snapshot-create too slow (kvm, qcow2, savevm)

2011-03-25 Thread Michael Tokarev
savevm _is_ slow, because it's writing to a qcow2 file with full (meta)data allocation which is terrible slow since 0.13 (and 0.12.5) unless you use cache=unsafe. It's the same slowdown as observed with default cache mode when performing an operating system install into a freshly created qcow2 -

[Bug 741887] Re: virsh snapshot-create too slow (kvm, qcow2, savevm)

2011-03-25 Thread Michael Tokarev
savevm _is_ slow, because it's writing to a qcow2 file with full (meta)data allocation which is terrible slow since 0.13 (and 0.12.5) unless you use cache=unsafe. It's the same slowdown as observed with default cache mode when performing an operating system install into a freshly created qcow2 -

[Bug 595438] Re: KVM segmentation fault, using SCSI+writeback and linux 2.4 guest

2010-11-11 Thread Michael Tokarev
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #603223 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603223 ** Also affects: qemu-kvm (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603223 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- KVM segmentation fault, using

[Bug 595438] Re: KVM segmentation fault, using SCSI+writeback and linux 2.4 guest

2010-11-11 Thread Michael Tokarev
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #603223 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603223 ** Also affects: qemu-kvm (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=603223 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- KVM segmentation fault, using

[Bug 586175] Re: Windows XP/2003 doesn't boot

2010-10-18 Thread Michael Tokarev
virtio disk is entrely different story, unrelated to this issue. ** Changed in: qemu Status: Incomplete = Fix Committed -- Windows XP/2003 doesn't boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is

[Bug 586175] Re: Windows XP/2003 doesn't boot

2010-10-18 Thread Michael Tokarev
virtio disk is entrely different story, unrelated to this issue. ** Changed in: qemu Status: Incomplete = Fix Committed -- Windows XP/2003 doesn't boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 586175] Re: Windows XP/2003 doesn't boot

2010-08-29 Thread Michael Tokarev
Does anyone else has similar problem? With 0.12.4 I were able to repeat it. With 0.12.5 all winxp and win2003 installations, existing and new, just work with either -drive or -hda or with virtio... -- Windows XP/2003 doesn't boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586175 You received this bug

[Bug 586175] Re: Windows XP/2003 doesn't boot

2010-08-29 Thread Michael Tokarev
Does anyone else has similar problem? With 0.12.4 I were able to repeat it. With 0.12.5 all winxp and win2003 installations, existing and new, just work with either -drive or -hda or with virtio... -- Windows XP/2003 doesn't boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586175 You received this bug

[Bug 586175] Re: Windows XP/2003 doesn't boot

2010-08-19 Thread Michael Tokarev
This is fixed by a backport of the mentioned patchset to stable-0.12 branch, in qemu git tree, see http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=qemu.git;a=commit;h=6394bd0e05441c363ebb73597c74c951378810e6 -- Windows XP/2003 doesn't boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586175 You received this bug

[Bug 586175] Re: Windows XP/2003 doesn't boot

2010-08-19 Thread Michael Tokarev
This is fixed by a backport of the mentioned patchset to stable-0.12 branch, in qemu git tree, see http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=qemu.git;a=commit;h=6394bd0e05441c363ebb73597c74c951378810e6 -- Windows XP/2003 doesn't boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586175 You received this bug

[Bug 586175] Re: Windows XP/2003 doesn't boot

2010-08-10 Thread Michael Tokarev
This appears to be fixed in 0.13-tobe by this patch: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-07/msg00152.html (hence it's fix released in debian which now has 0.13 in experimental). ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #588739 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588739

[Bug 586175] Re: Windows XP/2003 doesn't boot

2010-08-10 Thread Michael Tokarev
(and it is also filed agains debian qemu-kvm package, not just qemu -- http://bugs.debian.org/588739 ) -- Windows XP/2003 doesn't boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in

[Bug 586175] Re: Windows XP/2003 doesn't boot

2010-08-10 Thread Michael Tokarev
This appears to be fixed in 0.13-tobe by this patch: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2010-07/msg00152.html (hence it's fix released in debian which now has 0.13 in experimental). ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #588739 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588739

[Bug 586175] Re: Windows XP/2003 doesn't boot

2010-08-10 Thread Michael Tokarev
(and it is also filed agains debian qemu-kvm package, not just qemu -- http://bugs.debian.org/588739 ) -- Windows XP/2003 doesn't boot https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586175 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 513273] Re: kvm with -vga std is broken since karmic

2010-06-03 Thread Michael Tokarev
um. Can't you just take approach used in Debian, namely, to provide the sources for the bios files and compile them at build time? That is somewhat ugly, but at least it works... -- kvm with -vga std is broken since karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513273 You received this bug

[Bug 513273] Re: kvm with -vga std is broken since karmic

2010-06-03 Thread Michael Tokarev
um. Can't you just take approach used in Debian, namely, to provide the sources for the bios files and compile them at build time? That is somewhat ugly, but at least it works... -- kvm with -vga std is broken since karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513273 You received this bug

[Bug 574665] Re: kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (1TB).

2010-05-21 Thread Michael Tokarev
This is fixed by http://marc.info/?l=qemu-develm=127436114712437 -- kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (1TB). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574665 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. --

[Bug 574665] Re: kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (1TB).

2010-05-21 Thread Michael Tokarev
This is fixed by http://marc.info/?l=qemu-develm=127436114712437 -- kvm + virtio disk corrupts large volumes (1TB). https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574665 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 341682] Re: Block I/O crashes after migration

2010-05-07 Thread Michael Tokarev
It appears this bug (or similar) is back in 0.12. See Debian bug report #580649 (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580649 ). ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #580649 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580649 -- Block I/O crashes after migration

[Bug 341682] Re: Block I/O crashes after migration

2010-05-07 Thread Michael Tokarev
It appears this bug (or similar) is back in 0.12. See Debian bug report #580649 (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580649 ). ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #580649 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=580649 -- Block I/O crashes after migration

[Bug 500009] Re: floating point exception when Windows NT 4 guest uses its cirrus driver

2010-05-05 Thread Michael Tokarev
This bug is present in kvm-0.11 and is fixed in 0.12. JFYI. -- floating point exception when Windows NT 4 guest uses its cirrus driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in

[Bug 500009] Re: floating point exception when Windows NT 4 guest uses its cirrus driver

2010-05-05 Thread Michael Tokarev
This bug is present in kvm-0.11 and is fixed in 0.12. JFYI. -- floating point exception when Windows NT 4 guest uses its cirrus driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 270781] Re: unix_chkpwd crashes on gnome-screensaver

2009-04-03 Thread Michael Tokarev
This is in fact reproduceable. I had the same issue too, was difficult to debug (due to setuid-ness of the binary in question), but finally it turned out to be wrong permissions for /dev/full (local config error really) - it was 0660 instead of 0666, so unix_chkpwd was unable to open it when run