Upstream has a new patch that fixes this without any known breakage. I
tested it and confirmed it fixes things for me. However, it doesn't
apply to 1.7.4. I propose setting CONFIG_VGA_ALLOCATE_EXTRA_STACK=n
until the next seabios release after 1.8.1.
--
You received this bug notification because
** Patch added: A patch to fix the kernel-libipsec plugin packaging.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bug/1309594/+attachment/4335861/+files/strongswan-kernel-libipsec.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Patch added: A patch to fix the kernel-libipsec plugin packaging.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/strongswan/+bug/1309594/+attachment/4335861/+files/strongswan-kernel-libipsec.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
Public bug reported:
If a certificate has a policy, strongswan rejects it unless every
certificate up the chain has the same policy. For certificates issued by
CAs today, this is not a valid assumption. This assumption results in my
Ubuntu laptop being unable to connect to my workplace VPN (which
Public bug reported:
If a certificate has a policy, strongswan rejects it unless every
certificate up the chain has the same policy. For certificates issued by
CAs today, this is not a valid assumption. This assumption results in my
Ubuntu laptop being unable to connect to my workplace VPN (which
** Description changed:
If a certificate has a policy, strongswan rejects it unless every
certificate up the chain has the same policy. For certificates issued by
CAs today, this is not a valid assumption. This assumption results in my
Ubuntu laptop being unable to connect to my workplace
Public bug reported:
I'm running Ubuntu GNOME on Vivid.
Steps to reproduce:
1) Run gnome-control-center and click Network.
2) Click the + icon to add a connection
3) Click VPN
4) Click IPsec/IKEv2 (strongswan)
Expected results:
A configuration window opens with settings for an IKEv2 VPN.
** Description changed:
If a certificate has a policy, strongswan rejects it unless every
certificate up the chain has the same policy. For certificates issued by
CAs today, this is not a valid assumption. This assumption results in my
Ubuntu laptop being unable to connect to my workplace
Public bug reported:
I'm running Ubuntu GNOME on Vivid.
Steps to reproduce:
1) Run gnome-control-center and click Network.
2) Click the + icon to add a connection
3) Click VPN
4) Click IPsec/IKEv2 (strongswan)
Expected results:
A configuration window opens with settings for an IKEv2 VPN.
** Attachment added: Screenshot showing the problem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager-strongswan/+bug/1448879/+attachment/4385308/+files/network-manager-strongswan.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
I can confirm this on Vivid with the proprietary nvidia driver (version
346) installed. With switchable graphics disabled, I have an acpi_video0
backlight that does nothing. That is, the contents of
/sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0/backlight changes, but the screen's
brightness does not. If I
I'm running Precise. The 'Pass lo as faked tundev to NM' patch results
in Network Manager setting a 172.16.X.X IP on lo on VPN connect. Since
this replaces 127.0.0.1, other software breaks. Then, on VPN
disconnection, Network Manager takes lo down.
This can be trivially confirmed by running
I'm running Precise. The 'Pass lo as faked tundev to NM' patch results
in Network Manager setting a 172.16.X.X IP on lo on VPN connect. Since
this replaces 127.0.0.1, other software breaks. Then, on VPN
disconnection, Network Manager takes lo down.
This can be trivially confirmed by running
I haven't had a chance to test yet, but I will soon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404409
Title:
[regression] Intel 10Gb NIC Crashes
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Try to run 16-bit SkiFree in a 32-bit Windows OS inside a VM. You can
download it here: http://ski.ihoc.net/ski.zip It does not work on Trusty
(presumably through Wily) as-is, but if you set
CONFIG_VGA_ALLOCATE_EXTRA_STACK=n, it will work. (I haven't re-tested
this today, but that's what I and
Try to run 16-bit SkiFree in a 32-bit Windows OS inside a VM. You can
download it here: http://ski.ihoc.net/ski.zip It does not work on Trusty
(presumably through Wily) as-is, but if you set
CONFIG_VGA_ALLOCATE_EXTRA_STACK=n, it will work. (I haven't re-tested
this today, but that's what I and
** Changed in: pidgin (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/75850
Title:
Pidgin should support OS keyrings
To manage notifications about
I'll have to do more testing. I can't reproduce this on my trusty laptop
at the moment.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to seabios in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404396
Title:
[regression] vgabios - seabios
I'll have to do more testing. I can't reproduce this on my trusty laptop
at the moment.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404396
Title:
[regression] vgabios - seabios breaks (my)
Try Windows 7.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to seabios in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404396
Title:
[regression] vgabios - seabios breaks (my) 16-bit applications
To manage notifications about this bug
Try Windows 7.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404396
Title:
[regression] vgabios - seabios breaks (my) 16-bit applications
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
[Title copied from Debian bug, which was not filed by me. Description
below is mine.]
If an NTP client sends a request with a source port less than 123, the
packet is silently ignored by ntpd. This is occurring in our environment
due to NAT.
Attached is the patch already
Public bug reported:
[Title copied from Debian bug, which was not filed by me. Description
below is mine.]
If an NTP client sends a request with a source port less than 123, the
packet is silently ignored by ntpd. This is occurring in our environment
due to NAT.
Attached is the patch already
Excellent!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to seabios in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404396
Title:
[regression] vgabios - seabios breaks (my) 16-bit applications
To manage notifications about this bug go
Excellent!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404396
Title:
[regression] vgabios - seabios breaks (my) 16-bit applications
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
It's been fine with two different high traffic guests. We have generic-
receive-offload disabled now, to fix a different problem (it breaks IPv6
PMTUD when bridging). Maybe that's it. But when I was testing (for
comment #13), I did try leaving gro enabled and I still couldn't
reproduce the
The production system has been stable for a week. I suspect the problem
is fixed.
I recall reading something where someone was having trouble with an
ixgbe NIC, and they turned on SR-IOV in the BIOS. I rebooted the server
with Trusty today during maintenance and took screenshots of the BIOS
I've put a (less critical) production guest back on this system to see
if that reproduces the problem. If it's stable, I'll move the mission
critical guest (the one that typically reproduced the problem in the
past) over. Maybe that'll help narrow it down.
--
You received this bug notification
I seem to have forgotten. I'll test it today, for sure.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404396
Title:
[regression] vgabios -> seabios breaks (my) 16-bit applications
To manage
I seem to have forgotten. I'll test it today, for sure.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to seabios in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404396
Title:
[regression] vgabios -> seabios breaks (my) 16-bit
I can confirm that the proposed package fixes the issue. I tested before
the change by rebooting the guest using the stock SeaBIOS, and it was
broken. I installed seabios-1.7.4-4ubuntu1 from trusty-proposed and
rebooted the guest. It works now.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added:
I can confirm that the proposed package fixes the issue. I tested before
the change by rebooting the guest using the stock SeaBIOS, and it was
broken. I installed seabios-1.7.4-4ubuntu1 from trusty-proposed and
rebooted the guest. It works now.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added:
** Changed in: gnucash (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: gbonds (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182592
Title:
I realized later that my laptop doesn't run Trusty. It runs vivid. So
disregard my previous comment.
Anyway, we're running Windows Server 2008 (not R2, which is only
available in 64-bit). That's based on Vista, so maybe try Vista? This is
still reproducible for me in my test environment. SkiFree
I realized later that my laptop doesn't run Trusty. It runs vivid. So
disregard my previous comment.
Anyway, we're running Windows Server 2008 (not R2, which is only
available in 64-bit). That's based on Vista, so maybe try Vista? This is
still reproducible for me in my test environment. SkiFree
I do see some a kernel log entry that says audit_printk_skb: 42
callbacks suppressed, but definitely no stack dumps.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404409
Title:
[regression] Intel
I tested with this for some time tonight. I couldn't reproduce the
issue. In the past, for some reason, it's been easier (or only
possible?) to reproduce with a fresh install of Trusty. I'm going to
reinstall Trusty tomorrow and re-test.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
I reinstalled Trusty from scratch and I still can't reproduce it. It's
always been somewhat intermittent.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1404409
Title:
[regression] Intel 10Gb NIC
I will test the proposed package. I'm leaving for the weekend, so it
won't be until Sunday night / Monday morning (US/Central) at best, and
possibly the next night. But I will report back ASAP.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I will test the proposed package. I'm leaving for the weekend, so it
won't be until Sunday night / Monday morning (US/Central) at best, and
possibly the next night. But I will report back ASAP.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is
I can confirm that `sed -i "s|-Lsd|-LS6d|" /etc/default/snmpd` fixes the
problem for me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to net-snmp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246347
Title:
Lots of "error on
I can confirm that `sed -i "s|-Lsd|-LS6d|" /etc/default/snmpd` fixes the
problem for me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1246347
Title:
Lots of "error on subcontainer ‘ia_addr’ insert
Despite the Debian bug which says this was fixed in 1:1.5.3~rc4-1, this
is still a problem in 1:1.9.1-1ubuntu0.1 on Ubuntu Trusty.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #438793
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=438793
** Also affects: git-core (Debian) via
Can we get these added ASAP, if not in Wily then at least in Xenial?
hole_birth:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grub.git/commit/?id=a1007c6af296172c788f3346ff3ad30b9020f723
embedded_data:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/grub.git/commit/?id=4a7ea4003bd9f39e9bf2ebadbe4ab38f8874be66
** Description changed:
Upstream GRUB sets root=ZFS=rpool/path/to/rootfs by default. By
supporting that syntax (while retaining the existing support for
backwards compatibility), we can work out-of-the-box.
I've attached a patch for zfs-initramfs to implement this. Note that
since
Public bug reported:
Upstream GRUB sets root=ZFS=rpool/path/to/rootfs by default. By
supporting that syntax (while retaining the existing support for
backwards compatibility), we can work out-of-the-box.
I've attached a patch for zfs-initramfs to implement this. Note that
since this is creating
Public bug reported:
Debian Policy 7.2 / Ubuntu Policy 7.2:
The Depends field should be used if the depended-on package is required
for the depending package to provide a significant amount of
functionality.
zfs-initramfs loses all functionality if initramfs-tools is not
installed. And since
This has been stable on all systems for quite some time now. I don't
know what fixed it. It might be the SR-IOV thing. I'm marking it
Incomplete, since I can't reproduce it any more.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Trusty)
This has been fixed in at least Ubuntu vivid.
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to rsync in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479405
Title:
This has been fixed in at least Ubuntu vivid.
** Changed in: rsync (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/479405
Title:
--bwlimit option uses
zfsutils-linux has 0.6.5.7, but linux-image-4.4.0-23-generic only has
0.6.5.6.
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
apport information
** Attachment added: "PciMultimedia.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675762/+files/PciMultimedia.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675764/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: "Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675758/+files/Card0.Codecs.codec.0.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675761/+files/Lspci.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632
Title:
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version k4.4.0-23-generic.
AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu4
Architecture: amd64
ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v',
apport information
** Attachment added: "JournalErrors.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675760/+files/JournalErrors.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675769/+files/UdevDb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675763/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675765/+files/ProcModules.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632
apport information
** Attachment added: "WifiSyslog.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675770/+files/WifiSyslog.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632
apport information
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675759/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: "CRDA.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675757/+files/CRDA.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632
Title:
apport information
** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632/+attachment/4675756/+files/AlsaDevices.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1588632
Interestingly, the pre-built binaries in the linux-
image-4.4.0-23-generic (version 4.4.0-23.41) are -0ubuntu1 for SPL and
-0ubuntu3 for ZFS. I haven't looked at the package source to see where
those are coming from.
So on second thought, maybe this could use some attention.
--
You received
See this PPA, which should be ready for a sync into yakkety:
https://launchpad.net/~rlaager/+archive/ubuntu/zfs-0.6.5.7-2
This is the combination of the changes from 0.6.5.6-0ubuntu9 in xenial-proposed
applied to yakkety for this bug plus the fix for:
Has this been fixed in yakkety? I'm not seeing it in the change log. The
SRU process requires yakkety be fixed first.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579036
Title:
add dep8 tests for
I think that the xml plugin is only used for the exporter. So the
application as a whole probably doesn't break if php-xml is missing.
But, that said, adding php-xml as a dependency (as in yakkety) seems
perfectly fine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571241
Title:
ZFS initrd script does not import zpool using /dev/disk/by-id
** Changed in: zfs-linux (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1571241
Title:
ZFS initrd script does not import zpool using /dev/disk/by-id
** Tags removed: verification-done-blocked-on-devel
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1579082
Title:
minor changes to satisfy MIR request
To manage
I believe it was on IRC. I think the suggestion was that it may be
appropriate for ZoL. I wasn't sure if it was already in the works or
not. Given that this is news to you, I assume nobody has applied for
one.
I realize we don't want new features. I'm not suggesting always syncing
from the Ubuntu
I installed the built phpmyadmin 4:4.5.4.1-2ubuntu2 on the system where
I experienced this problem. PHPMyAdmin is still functioning correctly. I
see it has the correct dependency now.
** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification
There was some talk about Ubuntu giving ZoL a "micro release exception".
Either way, the best approach might be to bring in the latest micro
release (i.e. SRU what is in yakkety).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
In my original patch, I added BOOT=zfs code to conf.d/zfs. In your
package, you have that code in conf-hooks.d/zfs instead.
I installed the package from your PPA. It does not work. If I move the
code from conf-hooks.d/zfs to conf.d/zfs, then it works.
Here's my HOWTO for doing a ZFS root
(13:17:38) rlaager: ryao: Your comment on
https://github.com/zfsonlinux/pkg-zfs/pull/140 is seeming to give the Ubuntu
maintainer pause about accepting that patch. My position is that pool namespace
collisions are a separate issue (which will require changes to GRUB as well),
and that the
If we want to try to handle pool name collisions (and frankly, I'm not
convinced that we need to), that's a separate issue. That would involve
changing GRUB as well. This patch is a good improvement on its own. If
we want to enhance things more later, we can do that.
--
You received this bug
Also, the changelog entry for the udev rules file is wrong. The correct
filename is: /lib/udev/rules.d/60-zpool.rules
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1530953
Title:
Support GRUB's
We still need the `udevadm trigger` so the udev rule applies without a
reboot. Attached is a debdiff. This postinst follows the pattern that
other packages use. I've verified that it has the desired effect.
** Patch added: "zfs-initramfs-udevadm.debdiff"
This looks solid. One thing I wanted to note... putting the udev rules
in zfs-initramfs means that someone installing a system needs to install
zfs-initramfs outside of the chroot. If that file was in zfsutils-linux,
they wouldn't have to install the extra package. For my HOWTO, it
doesn't really
apport information
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1542826/+attachment/4565978/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1542826/+attachment/4565983/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1542826/+attachment/4565980/+files/Lspci.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1542826
Title:
NFS
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1542826/+attachment/4565982/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1542826
apport information
** Attachment added: "IwConfig.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1542826/+attachment/4565979/+files/IwConfig.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1542826
apport information
** Tags added: apport-collected trusty
** Description changed:
Steps to reproduce:
1) Mount NFS share from HA cluster with TCP.
2) Failover the HA cluster. (The NFS server's IP address moves from one
machine to the other.)
3) Access the mounted NFS share.
apport information
** Attachment added: "Lsusb.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1542826/+attachment/4565981/+files/Lsusb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1542826
Title:
NFS
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1542826/+attachment/4565986/+files/UdevLog.txt
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
apport information
** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1542826/+attachment/4565984/+files/ProcModules.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1542826
apport information
** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1542826/+attachment/4565985/+files/UdevDb.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1542826
Title:
Attached is a debdiff relative to the alpha PPA. This is the last of the
changes I have already implemented for the boot process.
It reworks the zfs initramfs script to more closely follow the upstream
Debian (non-zfs) initramfs scripts. Instead of using a ZFS-specific
/etc/default parameter to
Actually, it looks like we need a `udevadm trigger` in zfs-initramfs's
postinst script. Installing the package does not currently result in
those devices appearing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
Steps to reproduce:
1) Mount NFS share from HA cluster with TCP.
2) Failover the HA cluster. (The NFS server's IP address moves from one
machine to the other.)
3) Access the mounted NFS share.
Expected results:
Accessing the NFS mount works fine immediately.
Actual
I've attached a new 60-zpool.rules. Instead of matching on
ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}=="zfs_member", it uses ENV{ID_PART_ENTRY_SCHEME}=="gpt",
ENV{ID_PART_ENTRY_TYPE}=="6a898cc3-1dd2-11b2-99a6-080020736631".
That is, it matches based on the partition type. This way, the rule
matches when the partition is
The problem exists with the upstream kernel as well. It times out right
at 5 minutes instead of right at 15 minutes. So clearly some timer is
different. But the problem is still there.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream
Yes, that works fine.
I'm seeing deadlocks on 0.6.5.4, but that has nothing to do with this
change.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1530953
Title:
Support GRUB's native root=ZFS=
To
Public bug reported:
I'm trying to follow my own root-on-ZFS HOWTO, but for Xenial, which worked on
0.6.5.3:
https://github.com/rlaager/zfs/wiki/HOWTO-install-Ubuntu-to-a-Native-ZFS-Root-Filesystem
I can reproduce this using 0.6.5.4-0ubuntu1 from universe, before my changes
discussed in:
Chad, I'm not opposed to Ubuntu including both, but if you look at the
comment history, you'll see that I switched from zfs_member to the
partition type for a reason. `zpool create` doesn't trigger udev,
whereas partitioning tools do (by triggering the kernel to re-read the
partition table). As a
Colin, recommending zfs-zed is not, by itself, sufficient to email root
as this bug report asked for. The debdiff I attached would accomplish
this. Are you rejecting my changes, do you want them in a separate bug
report, or something else?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
I couldn't reproduce this when starting from a Xenial Live CD.
Previously, I was reproducing it using a Wily Live CD with the ZFS
package from Xenial. Given that's something that nobody needs to do in
the wild, do we care? Maybe just close this? Or would you prefer I test
your patched version with
601 - 700 of 1092 matches
Mail list logo
