[Bug 1949634] Please test proposed package
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage- tools/27.4.1~21.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- hirsute to verification-done-hirsute. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-hirsute. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949634 Title: [SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.3 -> 27.4) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute, Impish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1949634/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946833] Re: Merge bind9 from Debian unstable for 22.04
Note from Timo on ubuntu-server@: Just a heads-up that the new version breaks bind-dyndb-ldap (again), upstream has removed the api versioning information which the plugin depends on, so please don't merge this until there's some understanding on how b-d-l can be made to work with the new bind9. https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu- server/2021-November/009035.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946833 Title: Merge bind9 from Debian unstable for 22.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind9/+bug/1946833/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1930121] Re: package ubuntu-advantage-tools 27.0.2~18.04.1 - ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'uaclient'
Hello Peter, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.4~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930121 Title: package ubuntu-advantage-tools 27.0.2~18.04.1 - ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'uaclient' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1930121/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949634] Re: [SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.3 -> 27.4) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute, Impish
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.4~16.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949634 Title: [SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.3 -> 27.4) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute, Impish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1949634/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1930121] Please test proposed package
Hello Peter, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.4~18.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930121 Title: package ubuntu-advantage-tools 27.0.2~18.04.1 - ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'uaclient' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1930121/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1930121] Please test proposed package
Hello Peter, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.4~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930121 Title: package ubuntu-advantage-tools 27.0.2~18.04.1 - ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'uaclient' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1930121/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1930121] Please test proposed package
Hello Peter, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.4~21.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- hirsute to verification-done-hirsute. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-hirsute. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930121 Title: package ubuntu-advantage-tools 27.0.2~18.04.1 - ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'uaclient' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1930121/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1930121] Re: package ubuntu-advantage-tools 27.0.2~18.04.1 - ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'uaclient'
Hello Peter, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into impish-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.4~21.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- impish to verification-done-impish. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-impish. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Impish) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-impish ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930121 Title: package ubuntu-advantage-tools 27.0.2~18.04.1 - ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'uaclient' To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1930121/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949634] Re: [SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.3 -> 27.4) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute, Impish
I asked Steve about Xenial in #ubuntu-devel. Apart from the xenial- updates vs. ESM question, I'm happy with it and ready to accept it. If Steve confirms it's correct to land in xenial-updates, then I'll accept it into xenial-proposed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949634 Title: [SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.3 -> 27.4) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute, Impish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1949634/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949634] Please test proposed package
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.4~18.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949634 Title: [SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.3 -> 27.4) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute, Impish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1949634/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949634] Please test proposed package
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.4~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949634 Title: [SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.3 -> 27.4) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute, Impish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1949634/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949634] Please test proposed package
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.4~21.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- hirsute to verification-done-hirsute. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-hirsute. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Focal) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949634 Title: [SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.3 -> 27.4) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute, Impish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1949634/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949634] Re: [SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.3 -> 27.4) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute, Impish
Hello Lucas, or anyone else affected, Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into impish-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/27.4~21.10.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- impish to verification-done-impish. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-impish. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Impish) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-impish ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949634 Title: [SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.3 -> 27.4) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute, Impish To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1949634/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1950174] Re: [SRU] focal: gallium: Reset {d, r}Priv in dri_unbind_context
Hello Jean-Baptiste, or anyone else affected,
Accepted mesa into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be
available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/21.0.3-0ubuntu0.3~20.04.4 in a
few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how
to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this
update out to other Ubuntu users.
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug,
mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been
performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-
focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you,
please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-
failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will
not be able to proceed.
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in
advance for helping!
N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s)
fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in
-proposed for a minimum of 7 days.
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950174
Title:
[SRU] focal: gallium: Reset {d,r}Priv in dri_unbind_context
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1950174/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1947553] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for gnome-panel has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1947553 Title: wrong panel size 21.10 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-panel/+bug/1947553/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1916250] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for libsignon-glib has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916250 Title: gir1.2-signon-2.0 needs to declare replace on older releases (Groovy2Hirsute and Focal2Jammy) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsignon-glib/+bug/1916250/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949329] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for alsa-lib has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949329 Title: [SRU] alsa-lib: ucm: Regex returns correct value without matching a string To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hwe-next/+bug/1949329/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1904337] Update Released
The verification of the Stable Release Update for unity has completed successfully and the package is now being released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regressions. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904337 Title: Desktop crash on decorations computation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1904337/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946096] Re: Support manual firmware upgrading for Foxconn and Quectel modems.
I don't see how your updated "Where problems could occur" addresses my comment 22 at all. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946096 Title: Support manual firmware upgrading for Foxconn and Quectel modems. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1946096/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929999] Re: [SRU] libreoffice 6.4.7.2.M3 for Focal
Mailing list thread here: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu- release/2021-October/005278.html This SRU is blocked until a decision is made. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192 Title: [SRU] libreoffice 6.4.7.2.M3 for Focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/192/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1950174] Re: [SRU] focal: gallium: Reset {d, r}Priv in dri_unbind_context
This SRU upload is missing SRU information. Please follow
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure. Thanks!
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950174
Title:
[SRU] focal: gallium: Reset {d,r}Priv in dri_unbind_context
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/1950174/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949287] Re: Sync blinker 1.4+dfsg1-0.4 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Thank you for filing this! I've just got to triaging it today, but looks like Gianfranco also noticed this potential sync a few hours ago and has synced it already, so I'm marking this bug Fix Released. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949287 Title: Sync blinker 1.4+dfsg1-0.4 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blinker/+bug/1949287/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1868127] Re: [SRU] OpenVPN will not reload due to misconfigured .service file
It looks like the fix for this in Focal landed together with the security update in 2.4.7-1ubuntu2.20.04.2 (2.4.7-1ubuntu2.20.04.1 doesn't look like it ever got copied to focal-updates). I confirmed the patch is still present in the current version in Focal (2.4.7-1ubuntu2.20.04.3). ** Changed in: openvpn (Ubuntu Focal) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868127 Title: [SRU] OpenVPN will not reload due to misconfigured .service file To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvpn/+bug/1868127/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949288] Re: package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.27-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. Since it seems likely to me that this is a local configuration problem, rather than a bug in Ubuntu, I'm marking this bug as Incomplete. Specifically it looks like you have a misconfigured /etc/mysql/my.cnf. If indeed this is a local configuration problem, you can find pointers to get help for this sort of problem here: http://www.ubuntu.com/support/community Or if you believe that this is really a bug, then you may find it helpful to read "How to report bugs effectively" http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be grateful if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem, explain why you believe this is a bug in Ubuntu rather than a problem specific to your system, and then change the bug status back to New. ** Changed in: mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Summary changed: - package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.27-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 + mysql-server-8.0.postinst fails because /etc/mysql/my.cnf has recursive symlink -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949288 Title: mysql-server-8.0.postinst fails because /etc/mysql/my.cnf has recursive symlink To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/1949288/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949298] Re: package apache2 2.4.41-4ubuntu3.8 failed to install/upgrade: installed apache2 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1
Thank you for your report. This looks like a local configuration problem, rather than a bug in Ubuntu. You can find pointers to get help for this sort of problem here: http://www.ubuntu.com/support/community Since we use this bug tracker to track bugs in Ubuntu, rather than configuration problems, I'm marking this bug as Invalid. This helps us to focus on fixing bugs in Ubuntu. If you believe that this is really a bug, then you may find it helpful to read "How to report bugs effectively" http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be grateful if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem, explain why you believe this is a bug in Ubuntu rather than a problem specific to your system, and then change the bug status back to New. ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949298 Title: package apache2 2.4.41-4ubuntu3.8 failed to install/upgrade: installed apache2 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/+bug/1949298/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949266] Re: package openssh-server 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.3 failed to install/upgrade: 已安装 openssh-server 软件包 post-installation 脚本 子进程返回错误状态 1
Thank you for your report. This looks like a local configuration problem, rather than a bug in Ubuntu. Specifically it looks like you have manually deleted parts of your openssh installation, so therefore this package can be expected to be broken. You can find pointers to get help for this sort of problem here: http://www.ubuntu.com/support/community Since we use this bug tracker to track bugs in Ubuntu, rather than configuration problems, I'm marking this bug as Invalid. This helps us to focus on fixing bugs in Ubuntu. If you believe that this is really a bug, then you may find it helpful to read "How to report bugs effectively" http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd be grateful if you would then provide a more complete description of the problem, explain why you believe this is a bug in Ubuntu rather than a problem specific to your system, and then change the bug status back to New. ** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949266 Title: package openssh-server 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.3 failed to install/upgrade: 已安装 openssh-server 软件包 post-installation 脚本 子进程返回错误状态 1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/1949266/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949287] Re: Sync blinker 1.4+dfsg1-0.4 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
** Tags added: server-next -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949287 Title: Sync blinker 1.4+dfsg1-0.4 (main) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blinker/+bug/1949287/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1832998] Re: Pure-FTPd Breaks with OpenSSL v1.1.1
> Where problems could occur I think another area where things could go wrong is in regressing clients that use older protocol versions that are currently working. Could you add something to the Test Plan to do a smoke test in this area please? I'm not sure how to do this comprehensively, but at least this would confirm that we aren't breaking the entire world of older protocol clients or similar. ** Changed in: pure-ftpd (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1832998 Title: Pure-FTPd Breaks with OpenSSL v1.1.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pure-ftpd/+bug/1832998/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1832998] Please test proposed package
Hello Michael, or anyone else affected, Accepted pure-ftpd into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pure- ftpd/1.0.46-1ubuntu18.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1832998 Title: Pure-FTPd Breaks with OpenSSL v1.1.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pure-ftpd/+bug/1832998/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946096] Re: Support manual firmware upgrading for Foxconn and Quectel modems.
OK, so you currently have nothing in your Test Plan to verify this part of the changes you're proposing? Please either fix the Test Plan, or if testing this is impractical for some reason then we can discuss that and decide what mitigation might be appropriate, but in this case the omission and conclusion should be documented in this bug - presumably in the "Where problems could occur" section. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946096 Title: Support manual firmware upgrading for Foxconn and Quectel modems. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1946096/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1677684] Re: /usr/bin/corosync-blackbox: 34: /usr/bin/corosync-blackbox: qb-blackbox: not found
Hello Jorge, or anyone else affected, Accepted corosync into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/2.4.3-0ubuntu1.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: corosync (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1677684 Title: /usr/bin/corosync-blackbox: 34: /usr/bin/corosync-blackbox: qb- blackbox: not found To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1677684/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946890] Re: Merge python-django from Debian unstable for 22.04
I'm stealing this to work on with Lena. ** Changed in: python-django (Ubuntu) Assignee: Athos Ribeiro (athos-ribeiro) => Lena Voytek (lvoytek) ** Changed in: python-django (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946890 Title: Merge python-django from Debian unstable for 22.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-django/+bug/1946890/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946875] Re: Merge mysql-defaults from Debian unstable for 22.04
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1949465 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949465 I'm following the requestsync workflow with Miriam as an exercise for this task, which involved deliberately filing a duplicate bug for the sake of this exercise on my request. So I'm marking this bug as a dupe to make that one the primary bug now. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1949465 Sync mysql-defaults 1.0.7 (main) from Debian sid (main) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946875 Title: Merge mysql-defaults from Debian unstable for 22.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-defaults/+bug/1946875/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949465] Re: Sync mysql-defaults 1.0.7 (main) from Debian sid (main)
This bug was fixed in the package mysql-defaults - 1.0.7 Sponsored for Miriam España Acebal (mirespace) --- mysql-defaults (1.0.7) unstable; urgency=medium * Set Ubuntu defaults to the mysql-8.0 family. * Do not build default-libmysqld-dev on Ubuntu. * Switch to debhelper-compat (= 13). * Set Rules-Requires-Root: no. * Bump Standards-Version to 4.5.1, no changes needed. -- Andreas Beckmann Mon, 08 Feb 2021 22:46:21 +0100 mysql-defaults (1.0.6) unstable; urgency=medium * Change Debian defaults to MariaDB 10.5 as it is now available in both Debian unstable and Debian testing -- Otto Kekäläinen Sat, 05 Dec 2020 18:35:44 +0200 mysql-defaults (1.0.5ubuntu1) eoan; urgency=medium * Bump MySQL to 8.0. -- Robie Basak Mon, 12 Aug 2019 02:29:20 +0100 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949465 Title: Sync mysql-defaults 1.0.7 (main) from Debian sid (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-defaults/+bug/1949465/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1949465] Re: Sync mysql-defaults 1.0.7 (main) from Debian sid (main)
Thanks Miriam! I have verified with Miriam that the built debs are identical against the debs currently in Jammy (both the set of debs produced and their content), apart from the version number. So this is good to sync. Thanks also to Andreas Beckmann in Debian for incorporating the Ubuntu delta into the conditional build so that the package can stay in sync. ** Changed in: mysql-defaults (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1949465 Title: Sync mysql-defaults 1.0.7 (main) from Debian sid (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-defaults/+bug/1949465/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1628591] Re: ifup & ifdown don't work for vlan devices when raw device name is the new "enp" convention
Ubuntu focuses on netplan with systemd-networkd or Network Manager, and ifupdown isn't really supported any more except for edge cases not supported by netplan. Since vlan is supported by netplan, I'm therefore marking this Won't Fix for the Ubuntu development release. Note that ifupdown in Ubuntu barely differs from Debian now, so it seems likely to me that there would be no difference in behaviour from Debian here. ** Changed in: ifupdown (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1628591 Title: ifup & ifdown don't work for vlan devices when raw device name is the new "enp" convention To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ifupdown/+bug/1628591/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1389811] Re: tgtadm: out of memory crash
We're catching up on old bugs. I see that this one is marked Invalid for MAAS, but I don't see any steps to reproduce specifically for tgt on its own. Does anyone know if this bug still exists in tgt in Jammy, and if so, please could you provide steps to reproduce? Marking Incomplete as it looks like we never got an answer to whether the bug existed in the latest release at the time, and we don't have specific steps to reproduce. If you can supply either of those answers, please comment and then change the bug status back to New. ** Changed in: tgt (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1389811 Title: tgtadm: out of memory crash To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/maas/+bug/1389811/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1693122] Re: mongodb starts before network on VM and standalone
We've seen this pattern being requested in many packages: normally a network service dependency isn't needed because a service by default doesn't bind to a specific address. If a user configures a service to bind on a specific address, then often they also need to add the network dependency locally. Otherwise the service will start before the network interface is brought up and fail. Policy discussion: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu- devel/2021-May/041455.html Other affected services: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.tag=network-online- ordering However, in the case of mongodb, Ubuntu no longer ships mongodb in its latest releases, so there is no further action that can be taken on this bug specifically. For the Ubuntu development release, I'm therefore setting this bug to Won't Fix. It seems unlikely to me that we'd make a change to an existing stable release to add the service dependency, but that path remains potentially open. Note though that a workaround is trivially available by overriding the service configuration locally. ** Tags added: network-online-ordering ** Changed in: mongodb (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1693122 Title: mongodb starts before network on VM and standalone To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mongodb/+bug/1693122/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1646886] Re: smartmontools does not use current notifier
It looks like the current behaviour is by design: you won't get any notification by default if you just install smartmontools unless you also install a working mail system where you will receive emails to root@ (eg. by following the Suggests metadata). smart-notifier is a separate package which you can opt-in to using by installing it directly. It is true that it won't be pulled in by default, but this seems to be a design decision in smartmontools. If you need smart- notifier's functionality, it's necessary to install it directly. If there's a bug in smart-notifier then as Miriam says that's for separate bugs to represent. For _this_ bug then, I don't think there's any action to take so I'm marking it Won't Fix against the development release. If you disagree, feel free to comment and reopen this bug and we can discuss further. ** Changed in: smartmontools (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1646886 Title: smartmontools does not use current notifier To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/smartmontools/+bug/1646886/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948598] Please test proposed package
Hello Niclas, or anyone else affected, Accepted clevis into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clevis/12-1ubuntu2.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948598 Title: Can't unlock multiple devices in initramfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clevis/+bug/1948598/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948598] Re: Can't unlock multiple devices in initramfs
Hello Niclas, or anyone else affected, Accepted clevis into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clevis/16-1ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- hirsute to verification-done-hirsute. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-hirsute. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: clevis (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948598 Title: Can't unlock multiple devices in initramfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clevis/+bug/1948598/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948598] Re: Can't unlock multiple devices in initramfs
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948598 Title: Can't unlock multiple devices in initramfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clevis/+bug/1948598/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948598] Re: Can't unlock multiple devices in initramfs
Unsubscribing sponsors as I think there is nothing left to sponsor. ** Changed in: clevis (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948598 Title: Can't unlock multiple devices in initramfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clevis/+bug/1948598/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1904337] Please test proposed package
Hello Dario, or anyone else affected, Accepted unity into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/7.5.1+20.04.20211026.1-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904337 Title: Desktop crash on decorations computation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1904337/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1904337] Re: Desktop crash on decorations computation
Hello Dario, or anyone else affected, Accepted unity into impish-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/7.5.1+21.10.20211026-0ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- impish to verification-done-impish. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-impish. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu Impish) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-impish ** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904337 Title: Desktop crash on decorations computation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1904337/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1505670] Please test proposed package
Hello Rolf, or anyone else affected, Accepted squid-deb-proxy into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid-deb- proxy/0.8.14ubuntu0.18.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1505670 Title: python exceptions bleeding into stdout To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid-deb-proxy/+bug/1505670/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1505670] Please test proposed package
Hello Rolf, or anyone else affected, Accepted squid-deb-proxy into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid-deb- proxy/0.8.15ubuntu0.21.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- hirsute to verification-done-hirsute. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-hirsute. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: squid-deb-proxy (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1505670 Title: python exceptions bleeding into stdout To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid-deb-proxy/+bug/1505670/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1505670] Please test proposed package
Hello Rolf, or anyone else affected, Accepted squid-deb-proxy into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid-deb- proxy/0.8.15ubuntu0.20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: squid-deb-proxy (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1505670 Title: python exceptions bleeding into stdout To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid-deb-proxy/+bug/1505670/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1505670] Re: python exceptions bleeding into stdout
Following discussion, I'm adjusting the Bionic package version string from 0.8.14ubuntu1 to 0.8.14ubuntu0.18.04.1 to avoid any potential conflict with a future ESM update to this package in Xenial. ** Changed in: squid-deb-proxy (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1505670 Title: python exceptions bleeding into stdout To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid-deb-proxy/+bug/1505670/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1916250] Please test proposed package
Hello Rolf, or anyone else affected, Accepted libsignon-glib into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsignon- glib/2.1-3ubuntu0.21.04 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- hirsute to verification-done-hirsute. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-hirsute. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916250 Title: gir1.2-signon-2.0 needs to declare replace on older releases (Groovy2Hirsute and Focal2Jammy) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsignon-glib/+bug/1916250/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1916250] Re: gir1.2-signon-2.0 needs to declare replace on older releases (Groovy2Hirsute and Focal2Jammy)
11:45 vorlon: could you take a look at bug 1916250 for me please? I'm not sure it's right, but nor am I sure it's wrong. 14:29 rbasak: gir1.2-signon-2.0 exists in hirsute and later; gir1.2-signon-1.0 exists in focal; we support upgrades from the LTS to either the next LTS, or to the next supported non-LTS release. So there are upgrade paths to hirsute now, and to impish once hirsute EOLs, so yes it's correct to SRU this fix 17:00 vorlon: I agree it needs SRUing. My question is if a sole unversioned Replaces is correct. 17:00 rbasak: ah, that should be fine ** Changed in: libsignon-glib (Ubuntu Impish) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-impish -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916250 Title: gir1.2-signon-2.0 needs to declare replace on older releases (Groovy2Hirsute and Focal2Jammy) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsignon-glib/+bug/1916250/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1916250] Please test proposed package
Hello Rolf, or anyone else affected, Accepted libsignon-glib into impish-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsignon- glib/2.1-3ubuntu0.21.10 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- impish to verification-done-impish. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-impish. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: libsignon-glib (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916250 Title: gir1.2-signon-2.0 needs to declare replace on older releases (Groovy2Hirsute and Focal2Jammy) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsignon-glib/+bug/1916250/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1904337] Re: Desktop crash on decorations computation
The fix for this has been uploaded to jammy-proposed. ** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904337 Title: Desktop crash on decorations computation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/1904337/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948598] Re: Can't unlock multiple devices in initramfs
> Please reupload from Ubuntu Specifically regenerate the changes file on Ubuntu I mean. Just re-dput won't work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948598 Title: Can't unlock multiple devices in initramfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clevis/+bug/1948598/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1948598] Re: Can't unlock multiple devices in initramfs
The uploads are missing Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed headers in the changes files, which breaks our SRU workflow tooling. Please reupload from Ubuntu (or set the vendor to Ubuntu on Debian, etc). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948598 Title: Can't unlock multiple devices in initramfs To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/clevis/+bug/1948598/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1917920] Re: magic-proxy broke with iptables 1.8.7-1ubuntu2
The livecd-rootfs SRU for Bionic, Focal and Hirsute is currently blocked by another SRU in progress. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917920 Title: magic-proxy broke with iptables 1.8.7-1ubuntu2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/launchpad-buildd/+bug/1917920/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1944906] Re: MagicProxy broken when repo-snapshot-stamp is used
The livecd-rootfs SRU for Bionic, Focal and Hirsute is currently blocked by another SRU in progress. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1944906 Title: MagicProxy broken when repo-snapshot-stamp is used To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/1944906/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946096] Re: Support manual firmware upgrading for Foxconn and Quectel modems.
How do you intend to verify that (3) has worked correctly? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946096 Title: Support manual firmware upgrading for Foxconn and Quectel modems. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1946096/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946096] Re: Support manual firmware upgrading for Foxconn and Quectel modems.
> 3) Add a bunch of mappings from SIM->Carrier > Assuming (3) is not expected to change existing behaviour this looks like it would be acceptable under the hardware-enablement SRU policy. Agreed, but I would expect SRU information against every change being made, that would then receive separate SRU verification. This helps us mitigate risk by 1) actually considering each change in the first place, rather than it "slipping past" review; and 2) reducing the potential number of SRUs, and therefore user time, bandwidth and regression risk, by actually verifying that things are being changed as expected so we don't have to do it twice. I'm disappointed that this has now gone through two SRU review rounds, and it is Chris who has extracted the actual nature of the changes that you are looking to land here. This detail should have been laid out in the bug (or multiple bugs) and in the SRU information in the first place. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946096 Title: Support manual firmware upgrading for Foxconn and Quectel modems. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1946096/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1916250] Re: gir1.2-signon-2.0 needs to declare replace on older releases (Groovy2Hirsute and Focal2Jammy)
I'm surprised to see Replaces without a Breaks, and further for the Replaces to be unversioned. This doesn't match one of the cases listed at https://wiki.debian.org/PackageTransition, and https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-relationships.html#id11 explains why usually a Breaks is also required. Since I'm not sure this is correct, I'm reluctant to accept it on review. I'm not sure it's necessarily wrong, either. I'll ping Steve for an opinion. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1916250 Title: gir1.2-signon-2.0 needs to declare replace on older releases (Groovy2Hirsute and Focal2Jammy) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsignon-glib/+bug/1916250/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1843588] Re: Nautilus doesn't copy filenames for paste to other programs anymore
Thanks Dariusz. Are you intending to fix gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons in Focal also then, to restore the behaviour? If so, then shouldn't these be uploaded together with a Breaks clause to make sure users get both at the same time? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843588 Title: Nautilus doesn't copy filenames for paste to other programs anymore To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/1843588/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1943587] Re: [Ethtool][TSN] Support frame preemption
> These patches haven't been applied to upstream ethtool and the API they are using has not been accepted in upstream Linux yet. Thank you for flagging this. It might nevertheless be appropriate to carry patches in Ubuntu in advance of them landing upstream if there are Ubuntu development teams committed to maintaining that delta - providing this kind of hardware enablement being part of the point of Ubuntu. Of course this depends on the cost of writing the delta and then maintaining it, etc. To make progress, I'd expect to find an Ubuntu development team (kernel?) committed to maintaining it. ** Changed in: ethtool (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: ethtool (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943587 Title: [Ethtool][TSN] Support frame preemption To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/intel/+bug/1943587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1756238] Proposed package upload rejected
An upload of gdebi to impish-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "Missing SRU information. This looks like it wasn't intended for SRU, and the changes are now in Jammy?". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1756238 Title: gdebi-gtk broken in 18.04 error: unable to read filedescriptor flags To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vte2.91/+bug/1756238/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946499] Proposed package upload rejected
An upload of gdebi to impish-proposed has been rejected from the upload queue for the following reason: "Missing SRU information. This looks like it wasn't intended for SRU, and the changes are now in Jammy?". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946499 Title: installation of deb-packages with gdebi-gtk shows "dpkg: error: unable to read filedescriptor flags for : Bad file descriptor" in gdebi terminal, package is not installed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-mate/+bug/1946499/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1843588] Re: Nautilus doesn't copy filenames for paste to other programs anymore
According to the upstream bug, the change was necessary to work correctly with the desktop shell extension. Won't reverting the change risk integration issues with extensions, including the ones we ship by default? Shouldn't this be detailed in "Where problems could occur", and mitigation integrated into the Test Plan? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843588 Title: Nautilus doesn't copy filenames for paste to other programs anymore To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nautilus/+bug/1843588/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1898005] Re: gnome-shell crashed with SIGABRT in st_bin_destroy: assertion failed: (priv->child == NULL) called from DesktopManager::_destroyDesktopIcons() [desktopManager.js:234]
Hello Peter, or anyone else affected, Accepted gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-desktop- icons/20.04.0-3~ubuntu20.04.4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-desktop-icons (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1898005 Title: gnome-shell crashed with SIGABRT in st_bin_destroy: assertion failed: (priv->child == NULL) called from DesktopManager::_destroyDesktopIcons() [desktopManager.js:234] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1898005/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1945296] Re: To support goodix fp device [27C6:639C]
There's also an upload for Focal in the queue, but this bug is missing SRU information. If you intend to complete that then please let us know. Otherwise we'll reject the upload from the queue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945296 Title: To support goodix fp device [27C6:639C] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1945296/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1945298] Re: To support goodix fp device [27C6:63BC]
There's an upload for Focal in the queue, but this bug is missing SRU information. If you intend to complete that then please let us know. Otherwise we'll reject the upload from the queue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945298 Title: To support goodix fp device [27C6:63BC] To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1945298/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946096] Re: Apply upstream patches to fix problems for Foxconn and Quectel modems.
SRU review I don't see any explanation of what this is fixing, or why this is needed, so cannot review if the proposed changes qualify for an SRU under Ubuntu's policies. Specifically I need an explanation of actual user impact, not just "fix some problems". Further, note that the procedure says "Do not create a meta-bug with a title like "Please SRU this" rather than using existing bug reports". We need actual public bugs for each of the specific problems that you're fixing. Each of those bugs should be linked from the changelog, so we can ensure during SRU verification that each of those issues have individually been verified fixed. Done properly, there is then no need for a meta bug like this one. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Procedure for full details on what is expected. The Focal upload is also missing a proper bug reference - the reference given doesn't match the standard pattern so didn't get copied to the Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed header. I'm rejecting both the Hirsute and Focal uploads since both uploads need their changelogs fixing to properly reference public bugs that contain full SRU information. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946096 Title: Apply upstream patches to fix problems for Foxconn and Quectel modems. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1946096/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940136] Re: HyperV images do not include package manifests
Hello Jason, or anyone else affected, Accepted livecd-rootfs into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd- rootfs/2.525.56 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940136 Title: HyperV images do not include package manifests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/livecd-rootfs/+bug/1940136/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1472288] Re: Add additional attributes in /etc/os-release
Unsubscribing sponsors since there's no action to take unless my question above is answered. Once done, please resubscribe ~ubuntu- sponsors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1472288 Title: Add additional attributes in /etc/os-release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/base-files/+bug/1472288/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1814193] Re: systemd unit starts too soon - conflicts with openvpn
** Tags added: network-online-ordering -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1814193 Title: systemd unit starts too soon - conflicts with openvpn To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvpn/+bug/1814193/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1733388] Re: py.test-3 test discovery hangs when importing ubuntutools.lp.lpapicache Launchpad object
** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1733388 Title: py.test-3 test discovery hangs when importing ubuntutools.lp.lpapicache Launchpad object To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/usd-importer/+bug/1733388/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1199751] Re: [check-mir] does not use -proposed
This problem still exists. ** Changed in: ubuntu-dev-tools (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1199751 Title: [check-mir] does not use -proposed To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-dev-tools/+bug/1199751/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1677684] Re: /usr/bin/corosync-blackbox: 34: /usr/bin/corosync-blackbox: qb-blackbox: not found
This upload seems to drop a Breaks but this isn't mentioned anywhere. Is this intentional? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1677684 Title: /usr/bin/corosync-blackbox: 34: /usr/bin/corosync-blackbox: qb- blackbox: not found To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1677684/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1437359] Re: A PIDFILE is double-defined for the corosync-notifyd init script
Using an alternate init system isn't supported on Ubuntu. We support systemd only. Therefore I'm not sure this bug qualifies for an SRU. Is there any case where a user using systemd would be affected by this bug? Given the triviality of the fix, maybe we can accept it anyway given it's already uploaded. We can discuss that out of band. But if the upload needs changing because of my comment in bug 1677684 anyway, maybe we should just drop this fix in Bionic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1437359 Title: A PIDFILE is double-defined for the corosync-notifyd init script To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/corosync/+bug/1437359/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1785383] Re: missing EDNS0 record confuses systemd-resolved
Hello Steve, or anyone else affected, Accepted dnsmasq into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dnsmasq/2.79-1ubuntu0.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: dnsmasq (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1785383 Title: missing EDNS0 record confuses systemd-resolved To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1785383/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1774249] Please test proposed package
Hello Matthew, or anyone else affected, Accepted nova into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nova/2:17.0.13-0ubuntu4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774249 Title: update_available_resource will raise DiskNotFound after resize but before confirm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1774249/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1774249] Re: update_available_resource will raise DiskNotFound after resize but before confirm
It looks like the patch being applied here is applied in Ubuntu Impish, so would "Fix Released" for the Ubuntu development release task be more accurate? Either way, this looks good from an SRU perspective, so accepting - thanks. ** Changed in: nova (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774249 Title: update_available_resource will raise DiskNotFound after resize but before confirm To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1774249/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1813566] Re: augeas ftbfs in 18.04 LTS
Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected, Accepted augeas into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/augeas/1.10.1-2ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: augeas (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813566 Title: augeas ftbfs in 18.04 LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/augeas/+bug/1813566/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1828074] Re: Memory usage issues with large Apache httpd configuration files
Hello Larry, or anyone else affected, Accepted augeas into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/augeas/1.10.1-2ubuntu1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: augeas (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1828074 Title: Memory usage issues with large Apache httpd configuration files To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/augeas/+bug/1828074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1946599] Re: Firefox break when returning from console with wayland (nvidia) on ubuntu 21.10 beta
I can reproduce this issue with this snap: installed: 93.0-1 (631) 157MB - In my case, it's standby/resume that triggers it. However Ctrl+Alt+F3 then Ctrl+Alt+F2 does also. I suggest that the broken standby/resume use case makes this issue much more significant from a user impact perspective. Olivier's security.sandbox.content.read_path_whitelist workaround works perfectly. Thank you! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1946599 Title: Firefox break when returning from console with wayland (nvidia) on ubuntu 21.10 beta To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/firefox/+bug/1946599/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1798367] Re: [SRU] nodejs should use openssl1.0 in testing as well
** Tags added: bionic-openssl-1.1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1798367 Title: [SRU] nodejs should use openssl1.0 in testing as well To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nodejs/+bug/1798367/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 1942699] Re: SRU: Update Telegram Desktop to 2.9.2
Thank you for looking after this package in Ubuntu! On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 01:57:45PM -, Nicholas Guriev wrote: > In the next few weeks, Telegram will migrate from 32-bit user > identifiers to 64-bit ones. Version 3.1 is the minimal that supports > UIDs over 2 ³¹ - 1. Older version may stop working for new registered > users. I think it is worth to have this version in Ubuntu. At least, SRU > policy admits such updates. "May" stop working? Will it, or won't it? I don't think it's appropriate to speculatively update the package in a stable release unless you're actually sure. If you do the necessary analysis and confirm that it will actually break users in practice, that such breakage is to an unacceptable level (eg. the package won't work at all for newly registered users) _and_ that it's impractical to backport a fix, then I think an SRU to a new version with the fix would be acceptable. However, I don't think vague speculation about what _might_ break is enough. Please figure out the detail and post a comment explaining the detail. *If* my conditions above are clearly met from such an analysis, then +1 for a major version update. However if a backport or patch is practical, then that is preferable and I expect that instead. I don't think it's acceptable to ignore that preference and jump straight to a major version update without even looking. For example, why would a trivial patch switching the type to a 64-bit one not be practical? I will expect that to be explained first. I'd also like to pre-empt the usual argument I see in this kind of situation, which is "I prefer to maintain it this way because that's easier/more tested upstream/whatever". While that may be true, the cost is that users get disrupted as we break their expectations of a stable release. We have made a choice as a project to ship and then patch stable releases, and with that choice comes the acceptance of that patching risk. Users who prefer the other side of the trade-off already have that choice via the telegram-desktop snap. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942699 Title: SRU: Update Telegram Desktop to 2.9.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtgowt/+bug/1942699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1913421] Please test proposed package
Hello Christian, or anyone else affected, Accepted qemu into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/1:2.11+dfsg-1ubuntu7.38 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913421 Title: Load of pre-upgrade qemu modules needs to avoid noexec To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1913421/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1913421] Please test proposed package
Hello Christian, or anyone else affected, Accepted qemu into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/1:4.2-3ubuntu6.18 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913421 Title: Load of pre-upgrade qemu modules needs to avoid noexec To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1913421/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1913421] Re: Load of pre-upgrade qemu modules needs to avoid noexec
Hello Christian, or anyone else affected, Accepted qemu into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/1:5.2+dfsg-9ubuntu3.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- hirsute to verification-done-hirsute. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-hirsute. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-hirsute ** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913421 Title: Load of pre-upgrade qemu modules needs to avoid noexec To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1913421/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1936894] Re: microvm is not the default type for qemu-system-x86_64-microvm >=qemu5.2
Hello Christian, or anyone else affected, Accepted qemu into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/1:5.2+dfsg-9ubuntu3.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- hirsute to verification-done-hirsute. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-hirsute. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: qemu (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1936894 Title: microvm is not the default type for qemu-system-x86_64-microvm >=qemu5.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1936894/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1791958] Re: iptables-restore is missing -w option
> I'll monitor the "-backports" discussion and let's see from there. Looks like the backports pocket will be available again. I added bionic- backports so that this request can be found from that end, since it looks like backports was something being considered. I don't intend to imply any particular opinion about the best route. ** Also affects: bionic-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791958 Title: iptables-restore is missing -w option To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bionic-backports/+bug/1791958/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1942929] Re: [SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.2.2 -> 27.3) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~orndorffgrant/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+git/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+merge/409097 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942929 Title: [SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (27.2.2 -> 27.3) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Hirsute To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/1942929/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1945013] Re: mysql imposes a silent limit on passwords
It might also be worth fixing debconf to reject any password that MySQL will reject. But that can only be done if upstream have clear documentation so that the debconf script can accurately predict that, so this needs Sergio's point above addressed first before any progress can be made in packaging. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945013 Title: mysql imposes a silent limit on passwords To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/1945013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1942699] Re: SRU: Update Telegram Desktop to 2.9.2
The SRU team discussed this between themselves on 9 September. We don't think that "new features" are appropriate in telegram-desktop in stable Ubuntu releases, and so this is not sufficient justification for an SRU in itself. Users generally don't expect new features to appear in stable Ubuntu releases, and we don't think an exception is appropriate here. If you want to continuously ship the latest telegram-desktop features to Ubuntu users, we think that snaps would be a more appropriate solution. If you don't want to use snaps, then you might consider the backports pocket - subject to requirements from the backporters team as they get their process refined and restarted. If, however, there are specific bugs that need fixing in telegram- desktop in a stable release, or a specific change in the Telegram protocol that results in regressed functionality for users, then we can consider an SRU to fix that. If this is the case then such an SRU needs to be justified on those merits. I'm therefore going to set the stable tasks to Won't Fix and reject the uploads. Feel free however to repurpose this bug to fix some specific issue that is SRU-able - in which case please provide that justification and then reopen the bug. ** Changed in: libtgowt (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix ** Changed in: libtgowt (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix ** Changed in: telegram-desktop (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix ** Changed in: telegram-desktop (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942699 Title: SRU: Update Telegram Desktop to 2.9.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libtgowt/+bug/1942699/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929790] Re: Request to backport fix for endianness issue in TigerVNC vncviewer
Unsubscribing sponsors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929790 Title: Request to backport fix for endianness issue in TigerVNC vncviewer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1929790/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1929790] Re: Request to backport fix for endianness issue in TigerVNC vncviewer
Hello bugproxy, or anyone else affected, Accepted tigervnc into hirsute-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tigervnc/1.11.0+dfsg-2ubuntu0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- hirsute to verification-done-hirsute. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-hirsute. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: tigervnc (Ubuntu Hirsute) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1929790 Title: Request to backport fix for endianness issue in TigerVNC vncviewer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-z-systems/+bug/1929790/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1943564] Re: [SRU] Backport xrt 202020.2.8.743-0ubuntu1 to focal
Please can you explain why you're backporting rather than cherry-picking specific fixes here? If the diff is otherwise equivalent, why aren't you still intending to individually verify the specific fixes you need, as would be normal SRU process? If you don't intend to verify each fix individually, then please explain how the package complies with the requirements listed at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#New_upstream_microreleases > Additionally, the packages for amd64 are not really tested and won't be, so it is preferable to remove from the build. This is not sufficient justification to remove a build from a stable Ubuntu release. Many packages in Ubuntu aren't specifically tested, and we don't routinely remove those. > The package will disappear from amd64 arch, but anyway it was not really working and it is preferable to remove it rather than leaving people with a not working binary around. Is it not working at all, or not "really" working but still effective for some user? In what way doesn't it work? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943564 Title: [SRU] Backport xrt 202020.2.8.743-0ubuntu1 to focal To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xrt/+bug/1943564/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1877524] Re: blueman-tray error /home/username/.cache/blueman-tray-1000
Hello Artur, or anyone else affected, Accepted blueman into focal-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blueman/2.1.2-1ubuntu0.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- focal to verification-done-focal. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-focal. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: blueman (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877524 Title: blueman-tray error /home/username/.cache/blueman-tray-1000 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/blueman/+bug/1877524/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1904730] Re: neutron-agent-sriov fails to create port
Hello Michał, or anyone else affected, Accepted pyroute2 into bionic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pyroute2/0.4.21-0.1ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed- bionic to verification-done-bionic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed-bionic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: pyroute2 (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Tags removed: verification-done ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1904730 Title: neutron-agent-sriov fails to create port To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1904730/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1943480] Re: flatpak installation permission requirements different from ubuntu software
Thank you Seth for raising this. For clarity on the current status of this, the decision-making part of what is appropriate to do in Ubuntu here has been delegated by the Technical Board to the Ubuntu Security Team: https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2021/09/14/%23ubuntu-meeting.html#t19:17 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943480 Title: flatpak installation permission requirements different from ubuntu software To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flatpak/+bug/1943480/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1940656] Re: Potential use after free bugs in 1.1.1
Thanks Marc and Dimitri! With Marc's confirmation this is unblocked from the SRU queue then. But please don't assign me. Any member of the SRU team can process this. Assigning individual SRU team members not part of the SRU process, implies an implied lock that isn't there, and would only delay things because I am not processing SRUs this week. ** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu Focal) Assignee: Robie Basak (racb) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940656 Title: Potential use after free bugs in 1.1.1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1940656/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1913421] Re: Load of pre-upgrade qemu modules needs to avoid noexec
One thought. From a quick test, it looks like I can mount a directory
tmpfs over and over again, building up the list of mounts. So if there's
some other reason the script can't execute in /run/qemu, every time the
postinst runs, we'd mount over it again. So maybe we should additionally
not mount if /run/qemu is already a mount point, based on findmnt?
So I suggest:
Testing if we can execute ("test the fact"), AND checking that /run/qemu
isn't already mounted, to stop us doing it multiple times, and only then
manually adding the mount.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1913421
Title:
Load of pre-upgrade qemu modules needs to avoid noexec
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+bug/1913421/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
