[Bug 232469] Re: wget does not use network proxy in some cases

2009-02-13 Thread Savvas Radevic
Opened bug against gnome-control-center (gnome-network-properties) based on suggestion #2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/232469/comments/18 -- wget does not use network proxy in some cases https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232469 You received this bug

[Bug 329003] [NEW] unmet dependencies - gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad-multiverse depends on libmjpegtools0c2a (= 1:1.8.0) and libx264-59 (= 1:0.svn20080408)

2009-02-13 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gstreamer0.10-plugins-bad-multiverse $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu jaunty (development branch) Release:9.04 Codename: jaunty $ sudo apt-get install

[Bug 314516] Re: gnome-sharp2 transition

2009-02-13 Thread Savvas Radevic
Hi, I just thought of letting you know that I had dependency problem while upgrading to jaunty alpha 4 Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu jaunty (development branch) Release:9.04 Codename: jaunty $ sudo apt-get install tomboy Reading package lists... Done Building

[Bug 328965] Re: screen-profiles crashed with IOError in getstatusoutput()

2009-02-13 Thread Savvas Radevic
I thought I set it to Invalid, sorry. :) I'll try and reproduce it in the following 5 days - from what it looks like, it's a one time bug, probably because of old .screen* files. If I manage to make it crash again, I'll re-open it. :) ** Changed in: screen-profiles (Ubuntu) Status:

[Bug 329278] Re: wired networking not working after updating kernel from 2.6.27-9 to 2.6.27-11 on an MSI Wind

2009-02-14 Thread Savvas Radevic
lspci-vvnn.log Gregory attached above is the one that is working (-9-generic). When he boots to -11-generic, he gets this in lspci: 01:00.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8101E/RTL8102E PCI Express Fast Ethernet controller [10ec:8136] (rev ff) (prog-if ff)

[Bug 248809] Re: Deluge gives 'warning' newer version is available on start

2009-02-15 Thread Savvas Radevic
deluge (1.1.2.dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=low * New upstream version. - upstream tarball has been repackaged due to a problem with the file deluge/metafile.py, which is released with a non-dfsg free license (in addition to the old issue with GeoIP database); -

[Bug 248809] Re: Deluge gives 'warning' newer version is available on start

2009-02-15 Thread Savvas Radevic
Also, this: deluge (1.0.7.dfsg-2) experimental; urgency=low * Add deluge-core Depends: on python-pkg-resources (Closes: #510452). * Update 002-Do_not_check_for_update_as_default.dpatch to disable also alerts about new releases. -- Cristian Greco cristian.deb...@gmail.com Sun, 04 Jan

Re: [Bug 95685] Re: [needs-packaging] dcsharp

2009-02-15 Thread Savvas Radevic
What is the version of core dclib in 0.11.1? A hub on my lan only allows dc++ 0.698 or higher and dc# 0.11.1 can't connect. You should file a bug upstream: http://code.google.com/p/dcsharp/issues/entry -- [needs-packaging] dcsharp https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95685 You received this bug

Re: [Bug 95685] Re: [needs-packaging] dcsharp

2009-02-15 Thread Savvas Radevic
I don't know if this helps, but: http://www.google.com/codesearch/p?hl=en#_fVXoTwCG4c/trunk/base/Backend/Connections/HubConnection.csq=nmdc%20package:http://dcsharp\.googlecode\.coml=80 /// The only implemented protocol is Nmdc. Support for Adc is on its way. -- [needs-packaging] dcsharp

[Bug 228265] Re: [needs-packaging] FatRat download manager

2009-02-15 Thread Savvas Radevic
Is anyone working on this? -- [needs-packaging] FatRat download manager https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228265 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 228265] Re: [needs-packaging] FatRat download manager

2009-02-15 Thread Savvas Radevic
I've contacted the author about: 1) The bugzilla is not working: http://fatrat.dolezel.info/bugs/ Forbidden - You don't have permission to access /bugs/ on this server. Apache Server at fatrat.dolezel.info Port 80 2) Your links should be more uwatch-friendlier. uwatch is a debian application

[Bug 228265] Re: [needs-packaging] FatRat download manager

2009-02-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Description changed: Hi. I'd like to ask for FatRat download manager to be added to packages. Program is licensed under GPL v2. - More info here: - http://fatrat.dolezel.info/content/view/12/26/lang,en/ + Homepage: http://fatrat.dolezel.info/ FatRat is an open source download

[Bug 232469] Re: wget does not use network proxy in some cases

2009-02-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
This could be useful for suggestion #2, gnome-network-properties while applying system proxies could use /etc/profile.d/ Creating the following files in /etc/profile.d, and then this will work in *any* shell for *any* user of the system #proxy.sh export http_proxy=http://host.com:port/ export

[Bug 232469] Re: wget does not use network proxy in some cases

2009-02-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
Looks like gnome-network-properties' Apply System-Wide button adds the proxy variables to /etc/environment -- wget does not use network proxy in some cases https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/232469 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 316392] Re: setup-mysql fails with domain names containing hyphens

2009-02-16 Thread Savvas Radevic
Debian: Fixed in version wordpress/2.7.1-2 Changes: wordpress (2.7.1-2) unstable; urgency=low . * setup-mysql corrected to accept domain names with hyphens (Closes: #514447) * wp-config.php now dies if no config file is found (Closes: #500296) * now the static browser uploader is

[Bug 349572] Re: packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons

2009-04-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
I've sent a patch that covers this at bug #364443 ** Changed in: packagekit-gnome (Ubuntu) Assignee: Savvas Radevic (medigeek) = (unassigned) -- packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349572 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 364443] Re: FTBFS on jaunty amd64 and i386

2009-04-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Changed in: packagekit-gnome (Ubuntu) Assignee: Savvas Radevic (medigeek) = (unassigned) -- FTBFS on jaunty amd64 and i386 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364443 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 364443] Re: FTBFS on jaunty amd64 and i386

2009-04-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
I forgot the attribution to geser from IRC, since he recommended the proper fix! ** Attachment removed: packagekit-gnome_0.3.13-0ubuntu2.debdiff http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25819233/packagekit-gnome_0.3.13-0ubuntu2.debdiff ** Attachment added: packagekit-gnome_0.3.13-0ubuntu2.debdiff

[Bug 249104] Re: FTBFS on sparc due to false positive warning and -Werror

2009-04-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
Note: Build logs can be seen at: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit- gnome/0.3.13-0ubuntu1 -- FTBFS on sparc due to false positive warning and -Werror https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/249104 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 364808] Re: pbuilder: Invalid Release file, no valid components

2009-04-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
Try this: sudo pbuilder --create --distribution jaunty --components main restricted universe multiverse --mirror http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu; -- pbuilder: Invalid Release file, no valid components https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364808 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 364808] Re: pbuilder: Invalid Release file, no valid components

2009-04-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
Igor, did you see the command I said above? try this one, it does what you need (create a jaunty pbuilder for http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu): sudo pbuilder --create --distribution jaunty --components main restricted universe multiverse --mirror http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu; --

[Bug 364808] Re: pbuilder: Invalid Release file, no valid components

2009-04-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
You probably kept your /etc/ (?) This is a clean install (formatted root / partition, except my /home partition) of the most current daily ubuntu iso (yesterday's): $ cat /etc/pbuilderrc # this is your configuration file for pbuilder. # the file in /usr/share/pbuilder/pbuilderrc is the default

[Bug 364808] Re: pbuilder: Invalid Release file, no valid components

2009-04-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
And I think that in order to properly use --othermirror I think you need --override-config *before* each call: sudo pbuilder create --override-config --distribution jaunty --othermirror deb http://br.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jaunty main restricted multiverse universe -- pbuilder: Invalid

[Bug 249104] Re: FTBFS on sparc due to false positive warning and -Werror

2009-04-22 Thread Savvas Radevic
Proposed patch (not tested yet) It is based on a patch for bug #364443 This debdiff includes a patch that strips -Wcast-align ** Attachment added: packagekit-gnome_0.3.13-0ubuntu2_strips_wcast-align.debdiff

[Bug 364443] Re: FTBFS on jaunty amd64 and i386

2009-04-22 Thread Savvas Radevic
Proper patch included for bug #249104, bug #364443 and bug #349572 The patch can be found at bug #249104: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit-gnome/+bug/249104/comments/3 -- FTBFS on jaunty amd64 and i386 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364443 You received this bug

[Bug 349572] Re: packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons

2009-04-22 Thread Savvas Radevic
Proper patch included for bug #249104, bug #364443 and bug #349572 The patch can be found at bug #249104: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/packagekit-gnome/+bug/249104/comments/3 -- packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349572 You

[Bug 249104] Re: FTBFS on sparc due to false positive warning and -Werror

2009-04-22 Thread Savvas Radevic
I have re-attached the patch (identical to the one above, except without (testing) in debian/changelog). $ apt-cache policy packagekit-gnome packagekit-gnome: Installed: 0.3.13-0ubuntu2 Candidate: 0.3.13-0ubuntu2 Version table: *** 0.3.13-0ubuntu2 0 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

[Bug 314038] Re: Integrated video interface is broken in Jaunty

2009-04-24 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Description changed: Binary package hint: vlc + This is same issue as in bug #282582 (was for intrepid). Patch described + in + https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vlc/+bug/282582/comments/6 + was dropped during last merge, but it's still required for Integrated + video

[Bug 364931] Re: [needs-packaging] gnote in karmic

2009-04-24 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New = Confirmed ** Branch linked: lp:~medigeek/+junk/gnote-packaging -- [needs-packaging] gnote in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364931 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 364931] Re: [needs-packaging] gnote in karmic

2009-04-24 Thread Savvas Radevic
I have some packages (git version created today, 20090424) in my experimental PPA: https://launchpad.net/~medigeek/+archive/experimental The branch linked to this bug contains a better package, with versioned build dependencies: https://code.launchpad.net/~medigeek/+junk/gnote-packaging Even

[Bug 249104] Re: FTBFS on sparc, armel, hppa, ia64 due to false positive warning and -Wcast-align

2009-04-24 Thread Savvas Radevic
Fixed the changelog again: - Attribution to Michael Bienia who proposed the fix for the 05_fix_set_tooltip_text.patch - jaunty - jaunty-proposed ** Attachment added: packagekit-gnome_0.3.13-0ubuntu2_fixedchangelog.debdiff

[Bug 365163] Re: kompozer keeps crashing

2009-04-24 Thread Savvas Radevic
Can you run kompozer from terminal and provide more info about the crash? Thank you! -- kompozer keeps crashing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365163 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 343274] Re: Request for an upgrade to a newer version of Boost

2009-04-25 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 329042 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329042 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 335752 libboost* packages are out of date ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 329042 Boost 1.38 in Jaunty -- Request for an upgrade to a newer

[Bug 335752] Re: libboost* packages are out of date

2009-04-25 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 329042 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/329042 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 329042 Boost 1.38 in Jaunty -- libboost* packages are out of date https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335752 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 340901] Re: Please update gapti to version 0.0.3 (bzr rev 34)

2009-04-17 Thread Savvas Radevic
Ack'ed by ScottK on IRC, #ubuntu-motu: 2009-04-17 05:54:00 (CEST) ScottK savvas: motu-release ack to fix gapti. -- Please update gapti to version 0.0.3 (bzr rev 34) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 356935] Re: FFe: Please sync sqlite3 3.6.12-1 from Debian testing

2009-04-18 Thread Savvas Radevic
Is that fixed with sqlite3 3.6.12-1? You can try it from my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~medigeek/+archive/ppa -- FFe: Please sync sqlite3 3.6.12-1 from Debian testing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356935 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 363192] Re: sqlite3 packaged in Jaunty cannot open databases which use indexed keyword, and is therefore incompatible with Axiom

2009-04-18 Thread Savvas Radevic
Should we forward the sync request in a separate bug ( bug #356935 ) or should I close that one? -- sqlite3 packaged in Jaunty cannot open databases which use indexed keyword, and is therefore incompatible with Axiom https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/363192 You received this bug notification

[Bug 356935] Re: FFe: Please sync sqlite3 3.6.12-1 from Debian testing

2009-04-18 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Description changed: Binary package hint: sqlite3 + + UPDATE: + It seems that syncing this package would provide a fix for these bugs: + * bug #353064 + * bug #363192 Please sync sqlite3 3.6.12-1 from Debian testing (also in unstable). There are features as well as improvements in

[Bug 356935] Re: FFe: Please sync sqlite3 3.6.12-1 from Debian testing

2009-04-18 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Description changed: Binary package hint: sqlite3 UPDATE: It seems that syncing this package would provide a fix for these bugs: * bug #353064 * bug #363192 + KNOWN DOWNSIDES: + * Segfault when table contains default value:

[Bug 340901] Re: Please update gapti to version 0.0.3 (bzr rev 34)

2009-04-19 Thread Savvas Radevic
After Laney's request on IRC, I made the really-minimal-patch to just make gapti work for now. :) ** Attachment added: the really-minimal-patch version http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25745490/gapti_0.0.2ubuntu5.debdiff -- Please update gapti to version 0.0.3 (bzr rev 34)

[Bug 363794] [NEW] gpk-update-viewer shows updates available even after aptitude dist-upgrade

2009-04-19 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: packagekit-gnome packagekit-gnome: /usr/bin/gpk-update-viewer gpk-update-viewer shows updates available even after aptitude dist- upgrade Steps to reproduce: 1. Execute: sudo aptitude update 2. Now go to System Administration Update System

[Bug 363794] Re: gpk-update-viewer shows updates available even after aptitude dist-upgrade

2009-04-19 Thread Savvas Radevic
$ apt-cache policy packagekit-gnome packagekit-gnome: Installed: 0.3.13-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 0.3.13-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 0.3.13-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status -- gpk-update-viewer shows updates available

[Bug 349572] Re: packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons

2009-04-19 Thread Savvas Radevic
from packagekit-gnome package in ubuntu: gpk-prefs,desktop missing icon gpk-prefs gpk-repo.desktop missing icon gpk-repo I think it's upstream, since the rest of the icons seem in place :) It could also be gnome-icon-theme (?) $ grep Icon /usr/share/applications/gpk*

[Bug 349572] Re: packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons

2009-04-19 Thread Savvas Radevic
Sorry, missing icons: gpk-service-pack, gpk-log, gpk-repo, gpk-prefs -- packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349572 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 293176] Re: Ubuntu 8.10 doesn't support logitech and labtec webcam

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
Not working here either, gspca/tv8532 for device 046d:0920 - I get Input/output error :( $ apt-cache policy libv4l-0 gstreamer-tools libv4l-0: Installed: 0.5.8-1 Candidate: 0.5.8-1 Version table: *** 0.5.8-1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100

[Bug 293176] Re: Ubuntu doesn't support some logitech and labtec webcams

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
OK, I have managed to make it work, but the input is *ugly* (greenish)! Original guide: http://hansdegoede.livejournal.com/6630.html 1. Run this command in terminal: v4l-info | grep 'device info\|version' You will see: ioctl VIDIOCGTUNER: Invalid argument ioctl VIDIOCGFBUF: Invalid argument ###

[Bug 293176] Re: Ubuntu doesn't support some logitech and labtec webcams

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
P.S. Run this command to check if it was installed correctly: v4l-info | grep 'device info\|version' ioctl VIDIOCGTUNER: Invalid argument ioctl VIDIOCGFBUF: Invalid argument ### v4l2 device info [/dev/video0] ### version : 2.5.0 ### video4linux device info [/dev/video0]

[Bug 349572] Re: packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Also affects: gnome-icon-theme (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349572 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 349572] Re: packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
as andreasn replied packagekit specific icons should be installed by packagekit So this is a packagekit-specific bug that should be forwarded upstream :) ** Changed in: gnome-icon-theme (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: packagekit-gnome (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed

[Bug 349572] Re: packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #21298 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21298 ** Also affects: packagekit via https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21298 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons

[Bug 349572] Re: packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
It's a package mistake the icons have make rules to be linked, but the package doesn't seem to include them: install-data-hook: mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)$(DATADIR)/icons/hicolor/$(size)/apps; mkdir -p $(DESTDIR)$(DATADIR)/icons/hicolor/$(size)/mimetypes; ln -fs

[Bug 105411] Re: [needs-packaging] ocropus

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
Kevin - this sounds wonderful. Any estimate for when it'll be available in Jaunty? In the next synchronisation :) probably will land in karmic, but let's hope the new ocropus will be in Debian soon! http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=518772

[Bug 364443] [NEW] FTBFS on jaunty amd64 and i386

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: packagekit-gnome $ apt-cache policy packagekit-gnome packagekit-gnome: Installed: 0.3.13-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 0.3.13-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 0.3.13-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/universe Packages 100

[Bug 364443] Re: FTBFS on jaunty amd64 and i386

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Attachment added: failed_buid_logs.tar.gz http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25809468/failed_buid_logs.tar.gz -- FTBFS on jaunty amd64 and i386 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364443 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 349572] Re: packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons

2009-04-20 Thread Savvas Radevic
blocked by bug #364443 -- packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349572 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

[Bug 364443] Re: FTBFS on jaunty amd64 and i386

2009-04-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Changed in: packagekit-gnome (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Savvas Radevic (medigeek) -- FTBFS on jaunty amd64 and i386 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364443 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 349572] Re: packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons

2009-04-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Changed in: packagekit-gnome (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Savvas Radevic (medigeek) -- packagekit-gnome .desktop files use not-existing icons https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/349572 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 364443] Re: FTBFS on jaunty amd64 and i386

2009-04-21 Thread Savvas Radevic
This patch is for this bug and bug #349572 ** Description changed: Binary package hint: packagekit-gnome $ apt-cache policy packagekit-gnome packagekit-gnome: Installed: 0.3.13-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 0.3.13-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 0.3.13-0ubuntu1 0 500

[Bug 267513] Re: Wrong translation of Greek Modern

2009-03-24 Thread Savvas Radevic
Left new suggestions for the following translations: iso-639: Template iso-639 in Ubuntu Jaunty package iso-codes iso-639-3: Template iso-639-3 in Ubuntu Jaunty package iso-codes -- Wrong translation of Greek Modern https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267513 You received this bug notification

[Bug 267513] Re: Wrong translation of Greek Modern

2009-03-24 Thread Savvas Radevic
Greek, Modern - Ελληνικά This one is already fixed: Greek, Ancient - Ελληνικά, Αρχαία -- Wrong translation of Greek Modern https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267513 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 102773] Re: l10n broken in the KDE frontend

2009-03-24 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Assignee: Savvas Radevic (medigeek) = (unassigned) ** Summary changed: - l10n broken in the KDE frontend + l10n broken in software-properties -- l10n broken in software-properties https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102773 You received this bug

[Bug 347177] Re: python2.6 crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in decode()

2009-03-24 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 347327 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347327 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 102773 l10n broken in the KDE frontend ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 347327 kpackagekit crashes when installing packages from non ascii

[Bug 347177] Re: python2.6 crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in decode()

2009-03-24 Thread Savvas Radevic
Let's keep this as a bug itself to debug it If anyone thinks it's a duplicate, apport had it set as a duplicate of bug #102773 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 347327 kpackagekit crashes when installing packages from non ascii folders -- python2.6 crashed with UnicodeDecodeError

[Bug 347177] Re: python2.6 crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in decode()

2009-03-24 Thread Savvas Radevic
Open a terminal and execute this command: sudo apt-key list (If asked, type your password and press enter) Then paste the output of that command :) -- python2.6 crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in decode() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347177 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 347327] Re: kpackagekit crashes when installing packages from non ascii folders

2009-03-24 Thread Savvas Radevic
Same with: gpk-install-local-file töölaud/themonospot_0.7.1.1-1~getdeb2_all.deb Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/packagekit/daemonBackend.py, line 109, in run threading.Thread.run(self) File /usr/lib/python2.6/threading.py, line 477, in run

[Bug 347327] Re: kpackagekit crashes when installing packages from non ascii folders

2009-03-24 Thread Savvas Radevic
$ dpkg -S /usr/lib/packagekit/debfile.py packagekit-backend-apt: /usr/lib/packagekit/debfile.py $ apt-cache show packagekit-backend-apt Package: packagekit-backend-apt Source: packagekit $ apt-cache policy packagekit-backend-apt packagekit-backend-apt: Installed: 0.3.14-0ubuntu4 Candidate:

[Bug 347177] Re: python2.6 crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in decode()

2009-03-24 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Changed in: python2.6 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- python2.6 crashed with UnicodeDecodeError in decode() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347177 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 83922] Re: gdesklets does not start amd64

2009-03-24 Thread Savvas Radevic
Gutsy will soon reach end-of-life, it's best to ask for a jaunty fix ** Changed in: gdesklets (Ubuntu Gutsy) Status: In Progress = Invalid ** Changed in: gdesklets (Ubuntu Gutsy) Assignee: gDesklets Core Team (gdesklets-core-team) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: gdesklets (Ubuntu)

[Bug 344083] Re: packaging with pycentral for all python versions

2009-03-24 Thread Savvas Radevic
Not important, setting as invalid :) ** Changed in: aptoncd (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- packaging with pycentral for all python versions https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/344083 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

Re: [Bug 239952] Re: firefox - the associated helper application does not exist

2009-03-25 Thread Savvas Radevic
I still can reproduce it: $ apt-cache policy firefox-3.0 xulrunner-1.9 firefox-3.0: Installed: 3.0.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 3.0.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 3.0.7+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com jaunty/main Packages 100

Re: [Bug 239952] Re: firefox - the associated helper application does not exist

2009-03-25 Thread Savvas Radevic
Yep, still present on a new clean user, reproduceable with test-case: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=5369513 ** Description changed: Clicking some links in firefox-3.0 to download files displays the open/save dialog correctly, but if 'open' is selected with the default

[Bug 240606] Re: software-properties-gtk - install security updates downloads all updates, not only security

2009-03-25 Thread Savvas Radevic
It looks like it's apt 's fault, but I wouldn't bet on anything. I'll set it as Invalid as I don't really know the cause of this. :) If anyone sees this issue and can confirm it, change the status to Confirmed! ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid --

[Bug 336344] Re: python2.6-dev should perhaps depend on zlib-dev

2009-03-25 Thread Savvas Radevic
I've set it back to Confirmed, as the patch wasn't actually used! The last patch above does the trick. :) ** Changed in: capisuite (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released = Confirmed -- python2.6-dev should perhaps depend on zlib-dev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/336344 You received this bug

Re: [Bug 239952] Re: firefox - the associated helper application does not exist

2009-03-26 Thread Savvas Radevic
Most links are now fine for me, but I can still reproduce it with test7withusrbin.py Hew, try it with a new username, it's possible that you have registered the proper mime settings locally in your home configuration. :) -- firefox - the associated helper application does not exist

[Bug 239952] Re: firefox - the associated helper application does not exist

2009-03-26 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Attachment added: test1.odt.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24359365/test1.odt.png -- firefox - the associated helper application does not exist https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/239952 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 239952] Re: firefox - the associated helper application does not exist

2009-03-26 Thread Savvas Radevic
Download error: /tmp/test1.odt could not be opened, because the associated helper application does not exist. Change the association in your preferences. ** Attachment added: download-error.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24359391/download-error.png -- firefox - the associated helper

[Bug 140727] Re: syntax error on incoming fax

2009-03-26 Thread Savvas Radevic
Hi, this was marked 65 days ago as Incomplete. If you believe that the problem still exists, please try again and set the status of the bug from Incomplete to New. :) ** Changed in: capisuite (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- syntax error on incoming fax

[Bug 140727] Re: syntax error on incoming fax

2009-03-26 Thread Savvas Radevic
Sorry, I meant from Invalid to New -- syntax error on incoming fax https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/140727 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com

Re: [Bug 342450] Re: unable to install

2009-03-26 Thread Savvas Radevic
It was a long journey with small glitches, but here it goes!! Accepted imgseek 0.8.6-3: http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/imgseek/news/20090326T211723Z.html http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/imgseek.html -- unable to install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342450 You received this bug notification

[Bug 176803] Re: window does not fit on XGA screen

2009-03-26 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #397554 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=397554 ** Also affects: imgseek (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=397554 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- window does not fit on XGA screen

[Bug 102773] Re: l10n broken in software-properties

2009-03-26 Thread Savvas Radevic
Sent a bzr merge request for the bug mentioned above: https://code.launchpad.net/~medigeek/software-properties/kde_deb_and_deb-src_unicode_fix/+merge/4956 -- l10n broken in software-properties https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/102773 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 340901] Re: needs python 2.6 transition and porting

2009-04-02 Thread Savvas Radevic
Well... I eventually decided to keep python-support, could prove better in the future. I added a setup.py to do the legwork for the data installation. PPA Build: https://launchpad.net/~medigeek/+archive/ppa/+build/928193 Reflects revision 34 in gapti trunk:

[Bug 340901] Re: needs python 2.6 transition and porting

2009-04-02 Thread Savvas Radevic
P.S. I'm sorry if the changes in the ChangeLog seem messy. :) -- needs python 2.6 transition and porting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 354251] Re: package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 354228 package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-1ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: -- package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade:

[Bug 354326] Re: package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 354251 package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** This bug has

[Bug 354240] Re: package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 354251 package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ** This bug has

[Bug 354228] Re: package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-1ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
Same in python3.0: $ sudo aptitude -f install Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done Reading extended state information Initializing package states... Done The following partially installed packages will be configured: python3.0

Re: [Bug 340901] Re: needs python 2.6 transition and porting

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
Can I request an FFe to upload 0.0.3 ? http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24733041/gapti-dsc_and_tar-gz.tar.gz -- needs python 2.6 transition and porting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340901 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 354251] Re: package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 This seems to be a duplicate of the bug #354228 -- package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Re: [Bug 340901] Re: needs python 2.6 transition and porting

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
It's mostly the smaller patch mentioned above, directly changed to source, with proper copyright and license, debhelper 7 and of course compatibility with python2.6 (and probably later versions). Here is the changelog with changes introduced in 0.0.3: revno: 34 message: debian/rules:

[Bug 354360] Re: python2.6-minimal update error

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 354228 package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-1ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: -- python2.6-minimal update error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354360 You

[Bug 354328] Re: package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-1ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 This seems to be a duplicate of bug #354228 (not sure though) If you still face problems, remove the duplicate entry: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python2.6/+bug/354328/+duplicate ** This bug

[Bug 354371] Re: [Jaunty] Python3.0 dependency problem

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 354228 package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-1ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade: -- [Jaunty] Python3.0 dependency problem https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354371

[Bug 350443] Re: package update-manager 1:0.93.34 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: SystemError in cache.commit(): E:Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
I don't know if it's related, but VarLogDistupgradeTermlog.gz shows this: Errors were encountered while processing: python-scipy Traceback (most recent call last): File /usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py, line 753, in emit self.flush() File /usr/lib/python2.5/logging/__init__.py,

[Bug 340901] Re: Please update gapti to version 0.0.3 (bzr rev 34)

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
Ok, I misunderstood the feature-freeze exception. It seems that since this is a bug-fix release only (improvements in packaging), without any features, so I just need a sponsor for it (Thanks Luca!). Any takers? :) ** Summary changed: - needs python 2.6 transition and porting + Please update

Re: [Bug 354228] Re: package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-1ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
Please provide a clear do this and then this sequence to fix a trashed Intrepid-Jaunty upgrade. This makes sure you use archive.ubuntu.com and not xx.archive.ubuntu.com: sudo sed -i 's#http://\S*archive\.ubuntu\.com#http://archive.ubuntu.com#' /etc/apt/sources.list Then you simply update:

[Bug 354228] Re: package python2.6-minimal 2.6.1-1ubuntu8 failed to install/upgrade:

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
gmail broke the commands, here you go an updated list of commands: sudo sed -i 's#http://\S*archive\.ubuntu\.com#http://archive.ubuntu.com#' /etc/apt/sources.list sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get -f install sudo apt-get dist-upgrade Mind you that I haven't tried it and it might not work as

[Bug 289191] Re: Nokia 6500 Classic not supported yet

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
** Bug watch added: SourceForge.net Tracker #2194719 http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2194719 -- Nokia 6500 Classic not supported yet https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/289191 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 354488] Re: Python 2.6 fails to upgrade

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 This seems to be a duplicate of bug #354228 This bug was fixed, please try one of these solutions: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-central/+bug/354228/comments/17

[Bug 354457] Re: package python3.0-minimal 3.0.1-0ubuntu10 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2009-04-03 Thread Savvas Radevic
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 354228 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354228 This seems to be a duplicate of bug #354228 This bug was fixed, please try one of these solutions: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-central/+bug/354228/comments/17

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >