[Bug 1241884] Re: package nginx-full 1.4.1-3ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2015-04-25 Thread Thomas Ward
As 13.10 is well past End of Life, I am marking this as "Incomplete". If this is able to be reproduced in exactly the same way on 14.04 or any other later supported release, please make a comment to that effect. ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received

[Bug 1286182] Re: package nginx-full 1.1.19-1ubuntu0.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed pre-removal script returned error exit status 2

2015-04-25 Thread Thomas Ward
Hello. It looks like your init script has a syntax error on it. If this is still a problem, then please include the /etc/init.d/nginx script and attach it to this bug. The error indicates that /etc/init.d/nginx has a lot of things it shouldn't have in it, which would explain why it's failing to

[Bug 1444943] Re: trusty backport to remove sslv3

2015-04-26 Thread Thomas Ward
Related backport bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/trusty-backports/+bug/1448823 - swig3.0 backport request. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1444943 Title: trusty backport to remove ssl

[Bug 1444943] Re: trusty backport to remove sslv3

2015-04-26 Thread Thomas Ward
NOTE: This bug is also not the correct method for requesting a backport. I'll handle the backport requests for ZNC and related dependencies (pending Backports team requests), however you should read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports for the future, Anton. -- You received this bug notificat

[Bug 1444943] Re: trusty backport to remove sslv3

2015-04-26 Thread Thomas Ward
Related Security bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/znc/+bug/1389264 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1444943 Title: trusty backport to remove sslv3 To manage notifications

[Bug 1444943] Re: trusty backport to remove sslv3

2015-04-26 Thread Thomas Ward
Additional considerations: Backport of ZNC from Vivid to Trusty would also need testing on Utopic. Tests will need to be done as part of backport testing, however Bug #1448823 is the prerequisite before any ZNC backport testing is done. -- You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 1389264] Re: ZNC SSL listeners are vulnerable to POODLE.

2015-04-27 Thread Thomas Ward
Mikaela: See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/znc/+bug/1444943 for the (start) of work to get ZNC 1.6.0 into trusty-backports and utopic-backports. While this doesn't fully address the Security bug, it does provide the 1.6.0 functionality via the backports repository. -- You received t

[Bug 1444943] Re: trusty backport to remove sslv3

2015-04-27 Thread Thomas Ward
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1449248 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1449248 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1449248 Please backport znc 1.6.0-2 (universe) from vivid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribe

[Bug 1449271] [NEW] znc-dev 1.6 will not compile modules which need libicu functions.

2015-04-27 Thread Thomas Ward
Public bug reported: This is an issue that I have confirmed in ZNC 1.6. When a module is being compiled by znc-buildmod as part of znc-dev, and relies on unicode support or any functions provided by the icu source package (and libicu-dev), the modules will fail to build since the `libicu-dev` pac

[Bug 1449271] Re: znc-dev 1.6 will not compile modules which need libicu functions.

2015-04-27 Thread Thomas Ward
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #783546 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783546 ** Also affects: znc (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=783546 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you a

[Bug 1413555] Re: init script fails with error code 0 when configuration test doesn't pass

2015-04-27 Thread Thomas Ward
If this is not specific to NGINX there needs to be additonal bugs opened against the other projects. This bug will only address NGINX. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1413555 Title: i

[Bug 1449903] Re: package nginx-core 1.6.2-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2015-04-29 Thread Thomas Ward
This bug is in the same state as https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/1447294 - it is missing information necessary for identification of the problem. Please include output of the following commands: systemctl status nginx.service journalctl -xe Also provide the output of `sudo ng

[Bug 1224321] Re: nginx_1.1.19-1ubuntu0.2 missing conf file on 12.04

2013-10-22 Thread Thomas Ward
** Changed in: nginx Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1224321 Title: nginx_1.1.19-1ubuntu0.2 missing conf file on 12.04 To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1206878] Re: [SRU] Configuration should be purged only in nginx-common

2013-10-22 Thread Thomas Ward
I've tested 1.1.19-1ubuntu0.4 in precise-proposed in a newly-installed Precise VM, and this bug is indeed resolved by 1.1.19-1ubuntu0.4. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

[Bug 1170586] Re: Naxsi package lacking Stub Status

2013-10-02 Thread Thomas Ward
I'm setting this as "Incomplete" because this needs further research. According to the wiki page (which by the way is INCOMPLETE and UNDER CONSTRUCTION), the version of the software that *has* that software is in squeeze-backports and is 1.2.1-2, not 1.1.19-1, which is in Ubuntu and was in Debian

[Bug 1170585] Re: whitelist incorrect rule

2013-10-02 Thread Thomas Ward
** Tags added: precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1170585 Title: whitelist incorrect rule To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/

[Bug 1170586] Re: Naxsi package lacking Stub Status

2013-10-02 Thread Thomas Ward
** Tags added: precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1170586 Title: Naxsi package lacking Stub Status To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu

[Bug 1170586] Re: Naxsi package lacking Stub Status

2013-10-02 Thread Thomas Ward
This is why we don't explicitly trust Wikis or Debian. Let me clarify the issue: The issue isn't what the Debian wiki says. The issue is the 1.1.19 package and what was actually in it. If 1.1.19 in Debian never had Stub Status, and Debian never intended Stub Status in 1.1.19 then this is an Inva

[Bug 1170586] Re: Naxsi package lacking Stub Status

2013-10-02 Thread Thomas Ward
Further clarification: When I say Debian in my prior comments, I mean the Debian maintainers of the nginx package. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1170586 Title: Naxsi package lacking

[Bug 1245827] Re: Default index.html blindly overwritten

2013-10-29 Thread Thomas Ward
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1194074 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1194074 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1194074 Default index.html blindly overwritten -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 1194074] Re: Default index.html blindly overwritten

2013-10-29 Thread Thomas Ward
Confirmed because of duplicate bug #1245827 ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: Expired => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1194074 Title: Default index.html blindly

[Bug 1224321] Re: nginx_1.1.19-1ubuntu0.2 missing conf file on 12.04

2013-09-16 Thread Thomas Ward
Oh, wait, I answered that myself, 1.1.19 is what's in the repositories. ** Changed in: nginx Status: Incomplete => New ** Also affects: nginx (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subsc

[Bug 1224321] Re: nginx_1.1.19-1ubuntu0.2 missing conf file on 12.04

2013-09-16 Thread Thomas Ward
I believe this bug is related to the issue where the packages remove configuration files and such and don't reinstall them. Do me a favor and test this, please, Kelley. Do this, and see if the configs show up again: dpkg --reconfigure nginx-common -- You received this bug notification because y

[Bug 1224321] Re: nginx_1.1.19-1ubuntu0.2 missing conf file on 12.04

2013-09-16 Thread Thomas Ward
Kelley, It should not. However, I think the bug you ran into is related to a known bug in Debian that has a fix in the precise-proposed repositories. https://launchpad.net/bugs/1206878 is the bug where we noticed something similar to this, but nobody's gone through and tested the version in the

[Bug 1216817] Re: issue with nginx cache and nginx push module in nginx-extra package

2013-12-15 Thread Thomas Ward
Can someone post an example of their configuration, so I can attempt to replicate this in Debian's packages? If this breakage also occurs in Debian then it can be fixed there, and depending on how they fix it, I may be able to SRU the updates for Ubuntu, but I will be able to fix the issues in the

[Bug 1216817] Re: issue with nginx cache and nginx push module in nginx-extra package

2013-12-15 Thread Thomas Ward
** Changed in: nginx Importance: Undecided => Low ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1216817 Title: issue with nginx cach

[Bug 1216817] Re: issue with nginx cache and nginx push module in nginx-extra package

2013-12-15 Thread Thomas Ward
I have used a plain test example from Digital River on getting cache working with php5-fpm, and can replicate this error with `fastcgi_cache` in Debian. This is being forwarded to Debian for a fix, and I will attach a bug number here later. ** Changed in: nginx Status: Incomplete => Opinio

[Bug 1216817] Re: issue with nginx cache and nginx push module in nginx-extra package

2013-12-15 Thread Thomas Ward
This is reported in Debian against the nginx-extras package as Debian bug 732251. (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=732251) As this has been sent up to Debian for a fix, because this is replicated in *their* packages first and foremost, I am marking both the Nginx project bug and t

[Bug 1216817] Re: Using `fastcgi_cache` or `proxy_cache` with nginx-extras causes the push module to throw errors.

2013-12-17 Thread Thomas Ward
** Summary changed: - issue with nginx cache and nginx push module in nginx-extra package + Using `fastcgi_cache` or `proxy_cache` with nginx-extras causes the push module to throw errors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 1261235] Re: package nginx-full 1.4.1-3ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script pre-removal devolvió el código de salida de error 2

2013-12-18 Thread Thomas Ward
+1 to Daniel Manrique (roadmr) for providing a translation assist for the dpkg terminal logs. This "bug" eerily reminds me of Bug 1206878, which we fixed in Precise, but we may have overlooked Quantal, Raring, and Saucy. Based on Debian upstream and changes here, this does not impact Trusty, howe

[Bug 1261235] Re: package nginx-full 1.4.1-3ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script pre-removal devolvió el código de salida de error 2

2013-12-18 Thread Thomas Ward
"Unknown", can you please tell me what command(s) you were running to get this "bug"? I'm unable to replicate with just a "purge", which suggests it's *not* bug 1206878, however, without additional information I cannot begin to diagnose the issue with this bug. ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1224321] Re: nginx_1.1.19-1ubuntu0.2 missing conf file on 12.04

2013-12-18 Thread Thomas Ward
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1206878 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206878 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1206878 [SRU] Configuration should be purged only in nginx-common -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

[Bug 1261235] Re: package nginx-full 1.4.1-3ubuntu1.1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script pre-removal devolvió el código de salida de error 2

2013-12-19 Thread Thomas Ward
Ultimately, you can work around this error (unless others trigger) by doing `sudo touch /etc/nginx/nginx.conf` which will create a blank file that apt/dpkg can then remove. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

[Bug 1242413] Re: nautilus-dropbox needs a dependency on libappindicator1

2013-11-05 Thread Thomas Ward
clel: Bug 1211066 is marked as a duplicate of this bug, if the root cause is the same then when this bug is fixed it should fix the other issues as quoted in Bug 1211066 and Bug 1228971 (which is also marked as a duplicate of this one). -- You received this bug notification because you are a memb

[Bug 1242413] Re: nautilus-dropbox needs a dependency on libappindicator1

2013-11-05 Thread Thomas Ward
** Changed in: nautilus-dropbox (Ubuntu Saucy) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242413 Title: nautilus-dropbox needs a dependency on libappindicator1 T

[Bug 933726] Re: Firefox, incorrect language pack on PPC

2013-11-05 Thread Thomas Ward
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933726 Title: Firefox, incorrect language pack on PPC To manage notifications ab

[Bug 933726] Re: Firefox, incorrect language pack on PPC

2013-11-05 Thread Thomas Ward
"Won't Fix" status was requested by Phill Whiteside and set in accordance with bug procedures. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/933726 Title: Firefox, incorrect language pack on PPC To

[Bug 1132529] Re: Can't start wicd daemon

2013-12-04 Thread Thomas Ward
Bug status reset to Confirmed. Importance set to Medium per a request in #ubuntu-bugs on IRC. ** Changed in: wicd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium ** Changed in: wicd (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1206878] Re: [SRU] Configuration should be purged only in nginx-common

2013-08-08 Thread Thomas Ward
Robie: A, thanks for catching my mistake. I forgot all about -extras. Thanks for amending the upload to have a fix for -extras as well. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1206878 Tit

[Bug 1212356] Re: Ubuntu Bug Filing is not user-friendly

2013-08-15 Thread Thomas Ward
If you read the error you get, Josh, you need to specify the package or process ID number. That's easy, it's the same as if you were using the command line: ubuntu-bug PACKAGENAMEORPID Just replace PACKAGENAMEORPID with the name of the package, or the process id number (you can get that from `pid

[Bug 820354] Re: init script causes error in [re]starting

2013-08-29 Thread Thomas Ward
After Rohan Dighe emailed the Bug Squad mailing list regarding this issue, I tested this on a properly configured SKS server that has no peer servers. This server has actually been configured, which means that I installed 'sks' and then configured the software for the key database and the web inte

[Bug 1219978] Re: not installable because dependency pdumpfs is not in the archive

2013-09-02 Thread Thomas Ward
Remaining releases that have this bug: Precise (12.04), Quantal (12.10), Raring (13.04). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1219978 Title: not installable because dependency pdumpfs is n

[Bug 1219978] Re: not installable because dependency pdumpfs is not in the archive

2013-09-02 Thread Thomas Ward
This has been fixed for Saucy, and the package has been removed. Unfortunately, I'm not sure there's much that can be done for earlier releases which have this problem. However, if pdumpfs returns to Debian or Ubuntu, an attempt can be made to backport the pdumpfs dependency to any remaining stab

[Bug 1478281] Re: package nginx-full 1.6.2-5ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 1

2015-09-29 Thread Thomas Ward
This is not necessarily a bug. You have something else listening on Port 80. You need to make sure whatever else is listening on Port 80 is *not* listening on port 80 when you install nginx, and then change nginx's site configurations to bind to a different port. ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu)

[Bug 1483942] Re: Package won't work with mariadb-client

2015-10-01 Thread Thomas Ward
I've set verification-done based on comment 8 here, where Roger says it fixed the issue. ** Tags removed: verification-needed ** Tags added: verification-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Bug 1513299] Re: package nginx-full (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso instalado el script post-installation devolvió el código de salida de error 1

2015-11-12 Thread Thomas Ward
Odd, Apport decided to ignore the package hooks in the package in this case. Please run the following command in the terminal and include the output as either an attachment to this bug or as a bug comment: systemctl -l status nginx.service With data from this we will be able to hopefully debug

[Bug 1517865] Re: nginx-extras push module fd leak

2015-11-19 Thread Thomas Ward
Given that this is the first report of this in 18 months, I am going to set this as "Priority Low", and ask that you investigate to determine the cherry-pickable fix for this, or rather, the specific patch or changes necessary to fix the issue. If the cherry pick is identified, we may be able to g

[Bug 1517865] Re: nginx-extras push module fd leak

2015-11-19 Thread Thomas Ward
Every version of Ubuntu Utopic or newer is not affected by this issue as it was already fixed. ** Also affects: nginx (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you ar

[Bug 1510096] Re: Please merge 1.9.6-1 (main) from Debian Unstable (main)

2015-11-19 Thread Thomas Ward
** Summary changed: - Please merge 1.9.4-1 (main) from Debian Unstable (main) + Please merge 1.9.6-1 (main) from Debian Unstable (main) ** Summary changed: - Please merge 1.9.6-1 (main) from Debian Unstable (main) + Please merge 1.9.6-2 (main) from Debian Unstable (main) ** Description changed:

[Bug 1499094] Re: Please replace electrum with 'dummy' package in the repositories for Trusty, Vivid

2015-11-19 Thread Thomas Ward
Mathew Hodson: Do not mark this bug or the related bug as a duplicate of each other, they have different sponsoring/review/handling procedures. Adam Conrad (infinity, on IRC) unduped these after he and I discussed this on IRC, and they're being handled separately and differently. -- You receive

[Bug 1481033] Re: Please remove electrum from the archive

2015-11-19 Thread Thomas Ward
Oop, wait, i'm a little confused with two bugs. This one, regarding blacklisting and removal is different from the SRU-like replace-with- dummy-packages one you've linked, Mathew. They're handled differently in this case. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 1481033] Re: Please remove electrum from the archive

2015-11-19 Thread Thomas Ward
And I forgot to put a vivid debdiff here. I'll go poke that now... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1481033 Title: Please remove electrum from the archive To manage notifications abou

[Bug 1481033] Re: Please remove electrum from the archive

2015-11-19 Thread Thomas Ward
After discussion with Adam Conrad of the team governing this bug is being considered as a different request in a different category and is being handled as such (standard triage procedures are not applicable in this case). Blacklisting and removing a package in a devel release has a different hand

[Bug 1447294] Re: package nginx-full 1.6.2-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2015-10-22 Thread Thomas Ward
@Maciej Lutostanski: This bug here is marked Invalid as it is not giving us information, and is against a superseded version of the package. Please file a new bug with your information. You may wish to navigate to /var/crash/, look for a .crash item related to nginx, then run `ubuntu-bug /var/cr

[Bug 1507082] Re: package nginx-core 1.6.2-5ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: サブプロセス インストール済みの post-installation スクリプト はエラー終了ステータス 1 を返しました

2015-10-22 Thread Thomas Ward
This is not a bug, it's a broken installation. You are missing the following file: 10月 17 13:25:37 sailor nginx[6608]: nginx: [emerg] open() "/etc/nginx/mime.types" failed (2: No such file or directory) in /etc/nginx/nginx.conf:26 That's installed usually but it sounds like it didn't get insta

[Bug 1494183] Re: nginx/1.4.6 on 14.04 LTS x86_64, init.d script does not have proper error handling

2015-09-10 Thread Thomas Ward
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1413555 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1413555 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1413555 init script fails with error code 0 when configuration test doesn't pass -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 1098654] Re: nginx vulnerable to MITM Attack [CVE-2011-4968]

2015-09-10 Thread Thomas Ward
Ubuntu Wily has a fix for this included as part of the 1.9.3-1ubuntu1 merge. The fix for this issue was introduced in nginx 1.7.0. ** Also affects: nginx (Ubuntu Wily) Importance: Low Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu Wily) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Desc

[Bug 1483923] Re: dpkg-divert breaks nginx installation

2015-09-13 Thread Thomas Ward
Benjamin, Thanks for the post here. However, there's no debug information available here, really, to poke at things. One huge difference from 14.04 and 15.04 is systemd, can you include some debug information (such as the output of `systemctl -l status nginx.service` and `journalctl -xe`) so we

[Bug 1278388] Re: nginx upload-module plugin enablement

2015-09-13 Thread Thomas Ward
This is an old bug, however this was added in 1.4.4 -4 in Debian, and should now be available since Trusty... ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:/

[Bug 1495805] Re: package nginx-core 1.9.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2015-09-15 Thread Thomas Ward
Do you have Apache or some other service set up and running on Port 80 already? If so, disable that service (or at least stop the service) before running `apt-get install -f` or similar to finish configuration. You have a "cannot bind to port" error as a result of something else being bound to th

[Bug 1512344] Re: [Master Bug] Package nginx-* failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 (due to Port 80 being in use)

2015-11-02 Thread Thomas Ward
** Summary changed: - [Master Bug] Package nginx-* failed to install/upgrade due to Port 80 not being able to be bound to, due to "Address In Use" errors. + [Master Bug] Package nginx-* failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 (due to

[Bug 1512484] [NEW] package nginx-extras 1.6.2-5ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2015-11-02 Thread Thomas Ward
nx (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Thomas Ward (teward) Status: Invalid ** Tags: amd64 apport-package need-duplicate-check vivid ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 1512484] Re: package nginx-extras 1.6.2-5ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2015-11-02 Thread Thomas Ward
** Tags removed: need-duplicate-check -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512484 Title: package nginx-extras 1.6.2-5ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-instal

[Bug 1512484] Re: package nginx-extras 1.6.2-5ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2015-11-02 Thread Thomas Ward
** Description changed: This is a test bug. You can safely disregard this bug. It is needed - for apport testing. + for apport duplicate detection pattern testing. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04 Package: nginx-extras 1.6.2-5ubuntu3.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.

[Bug 1512484] Re: package nginx-extras 1.6.2-5ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2015-11-02 Thread Thomas Ward
** Description changed: - This is a test bug. You can safely disregard this bug. It is needed - for apport duplicate detection pattern testing. + This is the master bug for "Address in use" errors with regards to + package install/upgrade failures caused by Port 80 being in use. All + bugs whic

[Bug 1512344] Re: Package nginx-* failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2015-11-02 Thread Thomas Ward
** Summary changed: - [Master Bug] Package nginx-* failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 (due to Port 80 being in use) + Package nginx-* failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit

[Bug 1512344] Re: [Master Bug] Package nginx-* failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1 (due to "Address in Use" issue)

2015-11-03 Thread Thomas Ward
** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512344 Title: [Master Bug] Package nginx-* failed to install/upgrade: subprocess in

[Bug 1499094] Re: Please replace electrum with 'dummy' package in the repositories for Trusty, Vivid

2015-11-03 Thread Thomas Ward
Has this actually been done? I see no uploads that back up this being 'completed'. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1499094 Title: Please replace electrum with 'dummy' package in the r

[Bug 1323387] Re: Please include the Auth Request module in the nginx-extras package

2015-11-03 Thread Thomas Ward
We will not be adding additional modules to any of the flavors. On the roadmap for NGINX in later releases is dynamically-loadable modules. For Trusty, we are not changing existing functionality. If you need other modules we don't provide, you will need to recompile nginx yourself. ** Changed in

[Bug 1175027] Re: crypt_r() failed (2: No such file or directory) when using auth_basic

2015-11-03 Thread Thomas Ward
Hello. If this issue still exists, please make a comment as such on this bug. If there is no further activity in 60 days the bug will automatically be closed as "Incomplete" and "Expired". ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1513065] Re: package nginx-core (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2015-11-04 Thread Thomas Ward
Support for other packages is not through here, you should consider using a community support medium to get general recovery assistance. With regards to NGINX, the system is trying to bind to 192.168.1.8:80, but errors about not rig able to assign that address. Verify your configuration of that I

[Bug 1483923] Re: dpkg-divert breaks nginx installation

2015-11-11 Thread Thomas Ward
I'm going to take the following actions on this bug, and the Server Team is OK'd to say otherwise, since I'm slightly sleep deprived. > Agreed, no need to patch this in Ubuntu. Should be done in Debian, which I can see would have the same problem. -- Benjamin Bach, November 11, 2015, Comment 7 Gi

[Bug 1448690] Re: /sbin/dhclient-script has bashisms

2015-10-08 Thread Thomas Ward
Note that because of the Bashisms whatever address was negotiated is not assigned. This applies at least to IPv6, and if the bashisms interfere in IPv4 then it also interferes there. This means the essential function of the application does not operate, and the bug should potentially be a higher

[Bug 1505328] Re: Cups SSL is vulernable to POODLE

2015-10-12 Thread Thomas Ward
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi- bin/cvename.cgi?name=2014-3566 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1505328 Title: Cups SSL is vulernable to POODLE To manage notifications abou

[Bug 1505734] Re: init script return okayish error value (zero) when service start failed

2015-10-13 Thread Thomas Ward
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1413555 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1413555 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1413555 init script fails with error code 0 when configuration test doesn't pass -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 1505734] Re: init script return okayish error value (zero) when service start failed

2015-10-13 Thread Thomas Ward
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1413555 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1413555 NACK on the patch. The proposed patch is not the correct approach to fix this or the master bug. Debian has fixes, I'll dig them up. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun

[Bug 1510096] [NEW] Please merge 1.9.4-1 (main) from Debian Unstable (main)

2015-10-26 Thread Thomas Ward
) unstable; urgency=medium [ Christos Trochalakis] * New upstream release. * debian/copyright: + Fix licence order. -- Christos Trochalakis Mon, 24 Aug 2015 16:23:20 +0300 -- Build tests will be underway in ** Affects: nginx (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Assi

[Bug 1510096] Re: Please merge 1.9.4-1 (main) from Debian Unstable (main)

2015-10-26 Thread Thomas Ward
** Description changed: Please merge nginx 1.9.4 into Ubuntu. There are multiple changes, some of which are bug fixes, and some of which are workarounds and other changes. -- Upstream changelog on 1.9.4 is available, as well as for subsequent and prior releases, here: http:/

[Bug 1510245] [NEW] sbuild schroots fail for older releases which don't support 'overlay' and only support 'overlayfs'

2015-10-26 Thread Thomas Ward
Public bug reported: Environment: Trusty Architecture: amd64 Kernel: lts-vivid uname -a: Linux darksource 3.19.0-31-generic #36~14.04.1-Ubuntu SMP Thu Oct 8 10:21:08 UTC 2015 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Previously, overlayfs was not available in schroot. It no longer errors on this. Howeve

[Bug 1510460] Re: package nginx-core 1.9.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 1

2015-10-27 Thread Thomas Ward
Not a bug. If you read the systemctl output for the NGINX service or read the service logs, you will get the information about why your installation failed: NGINX could not bind to port 80. Check what's bound to port 80, and turn that service off temporarily while you install nginx. ** Changed in

[Bug 1512321] Re: package nginx-core 1.6.2-5ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 1

2015-11-02 Thread Thomas Ward
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1512344 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512344 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1512344 [Master Bug] Package nginx-* failed to install/upgrade due to Port 80 not being able to be bound to. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1512344] [NEW] [Master Bug] Package nginx-* failed to install/upgrade due to Port 80 not being able to be bound to.

2015-11-02 Thread Thomas Ward
80. To fix this issue, you need to first find what is listening on Port 80, and turn it off. At that time, either install NGINX or use 'apt-get install -f' to try and finish configuration. ** Affects: nginx (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: Thomas Ward (teward)

[Bug 1495805] Re: package nginx-core 1.9.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2015-11-02 Thread Thomas Ward
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1512344 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512344 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1512344 [Master Bug] Package nginx-* failed to install/upgrade due to Port 80 not being able to be bound to. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1476656] Re: package nginx-core 1.6.2-5ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2015-11-02 Thread Thomas Ward
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1512344 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512344 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1512344 [Master Bug] Package nginx-* failed to install/upgrade due to Port 80 not being able to be bound to. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1491978] Re: [wily] nginx fails to install on ARM64

2015-11-02 Thread Thomas Ward
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1512344 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512344 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1512344 [Master Bug] Package nginx-* failed to install/upgrade due to Port 80 not being able to be bound to. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1510460] Re: package nginx-core 1.9.3-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 1

2015-11-02 Thread Thomas Ward
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1512344 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512344 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1512344 [Master Bug] Package nginx-* failed to install/upgrade due to Port 80 not being able to be bound to. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1478281] Re: package nginx-full 1.6.2-5ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 1

2015-11-02 Thread Thomas Ward
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1512344 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512344 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1512344 [Master Bug] Package nginx-* failed to install/upgrade due to Port 80 not being able to be bound to. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1451093] Re: package nginx-core 1.6.2-5ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 1 zurück

2015-11-02 Thread Thomas Ward
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1512344 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1512344 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1512344 [Master Bug] Package nginx-* failed to install/upgrade due to Port 80 not being able to be bound to. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1512344] Re: [Master Bug] Package nginx-* failed to install/upgrade due to Port 80 not being able to be bound to, due to "Address In Use" errors.

2015-11-02 Thread Thomas Ward
** Attachment added: "systemctl_output.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx/+bug/1512344/+attachment/4511191/+files/systemctl_output.txt ** Description changed: This is a master bug for all package-type nginx bugs with install/upgrade failures as a result of port 80 being

[Bug 1512344] Re: [Master Bug] Package nginx-* failed to install/upgrade due to Port 80 not being able to be bound to.

2015-11-02 Thread Thomas Ward
When trying to fix this yourself... (1) Check the output of one of these two commands: 'sudo netstat -tulpn | grep :80' OR'sudo ss -tulpn | grep :80' This will indicate what processes are listening on IP/Port combination *:80 (2) Once you know the process/pid that is listening on

[Bug 1098654] Re: nginx vulnerable to MITM Attack [CVE-2011-4968]

2015-09-21 Thread Thomas Ward
Per the notes on the CVE tracker: sarnold> Backporting this fix is non-trivial and may break deployed applications. Someone who really wanted this could use stunnel as a work-around until 16.04 LTS is released. This applies to Precise, Trusty, and Vivid. ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu Precise

[Bug 1499094] Re: Please replace electrum with 'dummy' package in the repositories for Trusty, Vivid

2015-09-23 Thread Thomas Ward
** Patch added: "Removal DebDiff for Vivid" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/electrum/+bug/1499094/+attachment/4472711/+files/electrum_removal_vivid.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Bug 1499094] Re: Please replace electrum with 'dummy' package in the repositories for Trusty, Vivid

2015-09-23 Thread Thomas Ward
** Patch removed: "Removal DebDiff for Trusty" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/electrum/+bug/1499094/+attachment/4472709/+files/electrum_removal_trusty.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 1499094] [NEW] Please replace electrum with 'dummy' package in the repositories for Trusty, Vivid

2015-09-23 Thread Thomas Ward
Public bug reported: Related: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/electrum/+bug/1481033 Request: Please apply a retroactive SRU that will replace the Electrum binaries and such with 'dummy' packages. A related removal/blacklist request is linked above, and may be used as the supporting

[Bug 1499094] Re: Please replace electrum with 'dummy' package in the repositories for Trusty, Vivid

2015-09-23 Thread Thomas Ward
** Patch added: "Removal DebDiff for Trusty" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/electrum/+bug/1499094/+attachment/4472709/+files/electrum_removal_trusty.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Bug 1499094] Re: Please replace electrum with 'dummy' package in the repositories for Trusty, Vivid

2015-09-23 Thread Thomas Ward
** Patch added: "Removal DebDiff for Trusty" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/electrum/+bug/1499094/+attachment/4472712/+files/electrum_removal_trusty.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

[Bug 1444943] Re: trusty backport to remove sslv3

2015-04-16 Thread Thomas Ward
While this won't fix the problem fully, I have a ZNC PPA that works on Trusty that uses the packaging as is from Debian - see https://launchpad.net/~teward/+archive/ubuntu/znc for it. The packaging is the exact same thing from Debian (with minor changes on the Precise builds) ** Changed in: znc (

[Bug 1445595] Re: Empty Trash Results in File Windows Opening

2015-04-20 Thread Thomas Ward
** Changed in: nautilus (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1445595 Title: Empty Trash Results in File Windows Opening To manage notifications

[Bug 1446776] Re: package nginx-common (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: Versuch, »/usr/share/nginx/html/index.html« zu überschreiben, welches auch in Paket nginx 1.7.12-1~utopic ist

2015-04-21 Thread Thomas Ward
NGINX 1.7.x is not in Ubuntu. As such this is not valid against the Ubuntu package. Which repository are you using for NGINX 1.7.x anyways? ** Tags added: third-party-package ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a me

[Bug 1413555] Re: init script fails with error code 0 when configuration test doesn't pass

2015-04-22 Thread Thomas Ward
Also, please elaborate what you mean by 'certain configuration management tools' - unless they're used regularly by a substantial portion of existence (such as a well known configuration management tool) then I'm not sure the actual impact. Until that's clarified, I'm marking importance on this as

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >