[Bug 1575053] Re: Please move the "$HOME/snap" directory to a less obtrusive location

2018-07-03 Thread Viktoria Nemkin
The naming of the snap directory does not fit into the default xdg scheme, which is strange and annoying. On a fresh Ubuntu install you see: Desktop Documents Downloads Music Pictures Public snap Templates Videos -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1575053] Re: Please move the "$HOME/snap" directory to a less obtrusive location

2018-09-26 Thread Viktoria Nemkin
> The vast majority of Ubuntu users in the desktop have directories named similar to "Video", "Pictures", "Documents", "Downloads", "Music", etc there, which means that in fact this is a common practice, and a very well established one at that. Claiming otherwise, and repeatedly so, washes out the

[Bug 1575053] Re: Please move the "$HOME/snap" directory to a less obtrusive location

2019-01-11 Thread Viktoria Nemkin
As it stands right now, this bug has the most heat from all snapd bugs, more than 3 times as much as the next one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapd/+bugs?orderby=-heat=0 Yet, it's marked as 'Wishlist' and has been untouched for 3 years. -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1575053] Re: Please move the "$HOME/snap" directory to a less obtrusive location

2019-01-11 Thread Viktoria Nemkin
Also removed snapd. I cannot believe this package is by default part of the current LTS installation of Ubuntu. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1575053 Title: Please move the

[Bug 1575053] Re: Please move the "$HOME/snap" directory to a less obtrusive location

2019-01-11 Thread Viktoria Nemkin
@francescohickle15 People care about aesthetics. Many of them, including me, uninstall snap because of this. You are right, this is not a bug. This is bad design at the core of snap's architecture. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1514120] Re: Ubiquity needs to not disable the LVM and encryption options for dual boot

2019-05-28 Thread Viktoria Nemkin
@Xavier Gnata "That would be nice because it is a regression compared to 18.04 which was (IIRC) the last version offering a simple way to encrypt /home in the installer." We are using Ubuntu Mate 18.04.01 LTS. You can not encrypt anything (not /home, not /boot, not /) in the installer if you

[Bug 1514120] Re: Ubiquity needs to not disable the LVM and encryption options for dual boot

2019-05-03 Thread Viktoria Nemkin
I believe there is a use-case for an encrypted home+swap which should be considered. If you use Linux in an enterprise setup and your employees need both Windows and Linux for their daily tasks you will want to have their machines set up for dual boot. If they also happen to use laptops which they