[Bug 1877080] Re: rmlint-gui a.k.a. Shreeder does not work in Ubuntu Focal Fossa 20.04
Asked by email to associate this bug report to a package; launchpad won't let me select rmlint-gui, I can only select rmlint. ** Package changed: ubuntu => rmlint (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877080 Title: rmlint-gui a.k.a. Shreeder does not work in Ubuntu Focal Fossa 20.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rmlint/+bug/1877080/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1877080] [NEW] rmlint-gui a.k.a. Shreeder does not work in Ubuntu Focal Fossa 20.04
Public bug reported: rmlint-gui (a.k.a. Shreeder) 2.9.0-2 on top of Ubuntu 20.04 LTS Focal Fossa runs but it appears to scan a given directory too quickly, without scanning nor detecting subdirectories, and always reporting no duplicates. Command line rmlint seems to be working as usual though. This is the last gui driven dupe detection tool available in the Focal Fossa Ubuntu 20.04 LTS repo, all of the others have gone being deprecated, or depending on deprecated packages. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: rmlint rmlint-gui -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877080 Title: rmlint-gui a.k.a. Shreeder does not work in Ubuntu Focal Fossa 20.04 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1877080/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
@ Chris Rainey: no such a thing in my system. @ PeterPall: the scanner works properly now, it only didn't on the very first time using it. Weird, isn't it? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
@ PeterPall: regarding the Epson scanner, yes it could be the firmware upload, the first root scan took time, I thought it was the scanner warming up longer than usual and not catching up, but I allowed time and it finally went through, so You may very well be right. I did not run lsusb -v, just a plain lsub, but before the root scan the scanner was detected as an epkowa driven unknown model, after the root scan it is detected with the proper model name. @ Chris Rainey: regarding the Brother MFP, I can confirm that I ran the installer script and not the available deb packages. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Hi Peter, if the above is addressed to me, the Epson scanner works for regular users after the first scan as root, I do not get the reason why, but this is it. Thank You for stepping in. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Hi Michael, sudo is enough for driver installation, if You did not sudo that is why install failed. Root is the real system administrator, not needed for this task. REegards, Luca -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Hi again, Epson Perfection 4490 Photo, new Ubuntu Mate 19.04 install, iscan-bundle-1.0.0.x64.deb.tar.gz driver, make sure to add the line 'epkowa'to the /etc/sane.d/dll.conf file first; xsane gave a 'Access to resource has been denied' message as a regular user, same with 'sudo xsane' from a terminal, what I did is: 1) from a terminal enter 'sudo passwd root' and create a password for the root user, when done 2) enter 'su root' and provide the newly created password, when root 3) run 'xsane' despite the warnings AND scan a page (a previous attempt without scanning didn't work), after that, believe it or not, the scanner works, I do not really understand why and how, but this is it, though YMMV. Regards, Luca -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Hi all, Brother MFC-1910W, new Ubuntu Mate 19.04 install, Brother drivers from https://support.brother.com/g/b/downloadend.aspx?c=as_ot=en=mfc1910w_eu_as=128=dlf006893_000=4=625=true at first the scanner was not detected, my previous workaround involving libsane-extras is not an option anymore, since the package has been pulled out. What I did is: 1) created the file /etc/udev/hwdb.d/brother4.hwdb with the lines usb:v04F9p035D* libsane_matched=yes 2) created the file /etc/sane.d/dll.d/brother4 with the line brother4 the scanner works with no further tinkering, creating symlinks and the like. HTH Luca -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Hi Michael, are You installing as root or sudo? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Hi James, glad it worked! Hi all, on Ubuntu 18.04, with a multifunction HP printer/scanner I could only run the scanner as root; it was not my system and the relevant files were already /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sane, don't know if they were there by default or if the owner of the system put them in place. Anyhow, I applied my workaround in post #73 and 74, changing file names and vendor ID/product ID according to the HP driver, and the scanner can now be run as a user. Hope this can be of help to anyone struggling with HP devices. Regards, Luca -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1791765] Re: Indicator applet just displays "No Indicators" message
Back to normal, THA!!! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791765 Title: Indicator applet just displays "No Indicators" message To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mate-indicator-applet/+bug/1791765/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1791765] Re: Indicator applet just displays "No Indicators" message
Same here, upgraded from BB as soon as CC became available on a test system, never had the pleasure to see the indicators, which were working fine on the previous version. Cheers, Luca -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791765 Title: Indicator applet just displays "No Indicators" message To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mate-indicator-applet/+bug/1791765/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
@ Peter Bennet: hi there, I have a brother4 driven scanner too, all I did was to run the latest brother installer and install the libsane- extras package adding the line "brother4" to the file /etc/sane.d/dll.d /libsane-extras to get control of the otherwise not detected scanner. YMMV -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
After a bunch of Bionic updates the Brother MFC 1910W scanner gave up working; I have had to install the libsane-extras package and add the line "brother4" to the file /etc/sane.d/dll.d/libsane-extras to regain control of the device. Weird enough the Epson scanner wasn't affected by the updates. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane
Clean Ubuntu bionic install, the Brother4 worked out or the box, while the Epson iscan needed the well known workaround. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707352 Title: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug- ins for sane To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1707352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Double checked, brscan4 symlinks required! To sum it up: a) install libsane-extras b) install brscan4 c) 'sudo ln -sfr /usr/lib64/sane/libsane-brother* /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sane' d) execute 'lsusb' to get VendorId (04f9) and ProductID e) create '/etc/udev/hwdb.d/brother4.hwdb' content: usb:v04f9p* (p is product ID from lsusb, Example: usb:v04f9p035d, 04f9 is vendor ID, and 035d is product ID for Brother MFC-1910W") libsane_matched=yes f) edit '/etc/sane.d/dll.d/libsane-extras' add 'brother4' g) please take my apologies for rushing out the scoop. (and may the sane forgive me!) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Hi Staedtler, I didn't refresh the page before posting, so I didn't see Your post #76. Believe it or not the congrats go to You, I would have never done it without brainstorming with You, and Your posts #71 and 72 have been elightening. Regarding the /etc/sane.d/dll.d/libsane-extras file, I assume that to be in place the libsane-extras package has to be installed. I was so excited I forgot to double check if some symlink is needed between /usr/lib/sane and /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu and the like. I'll report back if required, for the benefit of the summary. If I do not pop in it means that no other step is to be taken, but I'm here if anybody needs help or clarifications. Regards, Luca -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
This is regarding post #54, I went to https://forum.ubuntu- it.org/viewtopic.php?f=9=624458 and it turns out that it's a false alarm, since the user reporting libsane1 failure on ubuntu 16.04 was in fact running 17.10. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
More on this, everything works as a user with simple-scan and gscan2pdf too, with both the Epson and the Brother scanners on I can select between peripherals. Again a public thank You to Staedtler for his help! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
To be precise: "v049f is vendor ID, and p035d is product ID" should read "049f is vendor ID, and 035d is product ID", as in usb:vp, where the Xs are the outcome of lsusb. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Hi Staedtler, bingo it is. I did try what You suggest, no joy, but the information that You collected (and that I couldn't even imagine of), have put me on the right track. Here's what works for me: 1) I created a /etc/udev/hwdb.d/brother4.hwdb file with the lines usb:v04F9p035D* libsane_matched=yes where the file is named after the backend, v049f is vendor ID, and p035d is product ID; those may very well change for other scanners :-) 2) edited the file /etc/sane.d/dll.d/libsane-extras and added the line brother4 this may very well change for other backends :-)) no need for the brother-udev-rule-type1 package, nor for Your clever hack, which has been a good catch anyway. I did not investigate on permissions, but I may! HTH with other scanners too. Thanks for engaging into this all. Regards, Luca -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Good monday Staedtler, here it is. Regards, Luca
'sane-find-scanner' gave 'found USB scanner (vendor=0x04f9 [Brother],
product=0x035d [MFC-1910W]) at libusb:002:003'
-
'udevadm info -a /dev/bus/usb/002/003' gave
looking at device '/devices/pci:00/:00:1d.7/usb2/2-4':
KERNEL=="2-4"
SUBSYSTEM=="usb"
DRIVER=="usb"
ATTR{authorized}=="1"
ATTR{avoid_reset_quirk}=="0"
ATTR{bConfigurationValue}=="1"
ATTR{bDeviceClass}=="00"
ATTR{bDeviceProtocol}=="00"
ATTR{bDeviceSubClass}=="00"
ATTR{bMaxPacketSize0}=="64"
ATTR{bMaxPower}=="2mA"
ATTR{bNumConfigurations}=="1"
ATTR{bNumInterfaces}==" 3"
ATTR{bcdDevice}=="0100"
ATTR{bmAttributes}=="c0"
ATTR{busnum}=="2"
ATTR{configuration}==""
ATTR{devnum}=="3"
ATTR{devpath}=="4"
ATTR{idProduct}=="035d"
ATTR{idVendor}=="04f9"
ATTR{ltm_capable}=="no"
ATTR{manufacturer}=="Brother"
ATTR{maxchild}=="0"
ATTR{product}=="MFC-1910W"
ATTR{quirks}=="0x0"
ATTR{removable}=="unknown"
ATTR{serial}=="E74244J6N463385"
ATTR{speed}=="480"
ATTR{urbnum}=="22"
ATTR{version}==" 2.00"
looking at parent device '/devices/pci:00/:00:1d.7/usb2':
KERNELS=="usb2"
SUBSYSTEMS=="usb"
DRIVERS=="usb"
ATTRS{authorized}=="1"
ATTRS{authorized_default}=="1"
ATTRS{avoid_reset_quirk}=="0"
ATTRS{bConfigurationValue}=="1"
ATTRS{bDeviceClass}=="09"
ATTRS{bDeviceProtocol}=="00"
ATTRS{bDeviceSubClass}=="00"
ATTRS{bMaxPacketSize0}=="64"
ATTRS{bMaxPower}=="0mA"
ATTRS{bNumConfigurations}=="1"
ATTRS{bNumInterfaces}==" 1"
ATTRS{bcdDevice}=="0413"
ATTRS{bmAttributes}=="e0"
ATTRS{busnum}=="2"
ATTRS{configuration}==""
ATTRS{devnum}=="1"
ATTRS{devpath}=="0"
ATTRS{idProduct}=="0002"
ATTRS{idVendor}=="1d6b"
ATTRS{interface_authorized_default}=="1"
ATTRS{ltm_capable}=="no"
ATTRS{manufacturer}=="Linux 4.13.0-16-generic ehci_hcd"
ATTRS{maxchild}=="6"
ATTRS{product}=="EHCI Host Controller"
ATTRS{quirks}=="0x0"
ATTRS{removable}=="unknown"
ATTRS{serial}==":00:1d.7"
ATTRS{speed}=="480"
ATTRS{urbnum}=="178"
ATTRS{version}==" 2.00"
looking at parent device '/devices/pci:00/:00:1d.7':
KERNELS==":00:1d.7"
SUBSYSTEMS=="pci"
DRIVERS=="ehci-pci"
ATTRS{broken_parity_status}=="0"
ATTRS{class}=="0x0c0320"
ATTRS{companion}==""
ATTRS{consistent_dma_mask_bits}=="32"
ATTRS{d3cold_allowed}=="1"
ATTRS{device}=="0x3a3a"
ATTRS{dma_mask_bits}=="32"
ATTRS{driver_override}=="(null)"
ATTRS{enable}=="1"
ATTRS{irq}=="23"
ATTRS{local_cpulist}=="0-3"
ATTRS{local_cpus}=="f"
ATTRS{msi_bus}=="1"
ATTRS{numa_node}=="-1"
ATTRS{revision}=="0x00"
ATTRS{subsystem_device}=="0x82d4"
ATTRS{subsystem_vendor}=="0x1043"
ATTRS{uframe_periodic_max}=="100"
ATTRS{vendor}=="0x8086"
looking at parent device '/devices/pci:00':
KERNELS=="pci:00"
SUBSYSTEMS==""
DRIVERS==""
-
'udevadm test /devices/pci:00/:00:1d.7/usb2/2-4' gave
=== trie on-disk ===
tool version: 234
file size: 9138057 bytes
header size 80 bytes
strings1910865 bytes
nodes 7227112 bytes
Load module index
Failed to read $container of PID 1, ignoring: Permission denied
Found container virtualization none.
timestamp of '/etc/systemd/network' changed
timestamp of '/lib/systemd/network' changed
Parsed configuration file /lib/systemd/network/99-default.link
Created link configuration context.
timestamp of '/etc/udev/rules.d' changed
Reading rules file: /lib/udev/rules.d/39-usbmuxd.rules
Reading rules file: /lib/udev/rules.d/40-usb-media-players.rules
Reading rules file: /lib/udev/rules.d/40-usb_modeswitch.rules
Reading rules file: /lib/udev/rules.d/40-vm-hotadd.rules
Reading rules file: /lib/udev/rules.d/50-apport.rules
Reading rules file: /lib/udev/rules.d/50-firmware.rules
Reading rules file: /lib/udev/rules.d/50-udev-default.rules
Reading rules file: /lib/udev/rules.d/55-dm.rules
Reading rules file: /lib/udev/rules.d/55-ippusbxd.rules
Reading rules file: /lib/udev/rules.d/60-block.rules
Reading rules file: /etc/udev/rules.d/60-brother-libsane-type1.rules
Invalid rule /etc/udev/rules.d/60-brother-libsane-type1.rules:17: unknown key
'SYSFS{idVendor}'
Reading rules file: /lib/udev/rules.d/60-cdrom_id.rules
Reading rules file: /lib/udev/rules.d/60-crda.rules
Reading rules file: /lib/udev/rules.d/60-drm.rules
Reading rules file: /lib/udev/rules.d/60-evdev.rules
Reading rules file: /lib/udev/rules.d/60-gnupg2.rules
Reading rules file: /lib/udev/rules.d/60-input-id.rules
Reading rules file: /lib/udev/rules.d/60-inputattach.rules
Reading rules file: /lib/udev/rules.d/60-libgphoto2-6.rules
Reading rules file: /lib/udev/rules.d/60-libsane.rules
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Hi Staedtler, attached the xsane diff file. I'm out of ideas as well, but thank You for Your time and effort. ** Attachment added: "diff.xsane.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+attachment/5010365/+files/diff.xsane.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Hi Staedtler, attached is the diff file, it's beyond my understanding :-) even more since scanimage -L does not detect the scanner even as root, although the scanner itself works running xsane from a root terminal. ** Attachment added: "scanimage -L output diff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+attachment/5009886/+files/diff.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
My bad: the 'ENV' line is on by default, not the 'SYMLINK', my
apologies. Following is the content of the 60-brother-mfp-type1.rules
installed by the brother-udev-rule-type1 package. Uncommenting the
options at the bottom doesn't make any difference: the scanner only
works with xsane as true root.
#
# udev rules sample for Brother MFP
# version 1.0.2-0
#
# Copyright (C) 2012-2016 Brother. Industries, Ltd.
#
# copy to /etc/udev/rules.d or /lib/udev/rules.d
#
ACTION!="add", GOTO="brother_mfp_end"
SUBSYSTEM=="usb", GOTO="brother_mfp_udev_1"
SUBSYSTEM!="usb_device", GOTO="brother_mfp_end"
LABEL="brother_mfp_udev_1"
SYSFS{idVendor}=="04f9", GOTO="brother_mfp_udev_2"
ATTRS{idVendor}=="04f9", GOTO="brother_mfp_udev_2"
GOTO="brother_mfp_end"
LABEL="brother_mfp_udev_2"
# ATTRS{bInterfaceNumber}=="01", GOTO="brother_mfp_udev_3"
# ATTRS{bInterfaceNumber}=="02", GOTO="brother_mfp_udev_3"
# ATTRS{bInterfaceNumber}=="03", GOTO="brother_mfp_udev_3"
# GOTO="brother_mfp_end"
# LABEL="brother_mfp_udev_3"
ATTRS{bInterfaceClass}!="0ff", GOTO="brother_mfp_end"
ATTRS{bInterfaceSubClass}!="0ff", GOTO="brother_mfp_end"
ATTRS{bInterfaceProtocol}!="0ff", GOTO="brother_mfp_end"
#MODE="0666"
#GROUP="scanner"
ENV{libsane_matched}="yes"
#SYMLINK+="scanner-%k"
LABEL="brother_mfp_end"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012
Title:
Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Hi Staedtler, did that, and fought with several rules files before to no joy. What You suggest is pretty much the same as what the brother-udev- rule-type1 package does with a 60 sane something rules file, except that in the Brother installer script only the line 'SYMLINK' is active, the rest of the lines are commented out, including permissions, eventually preset for 0666; needless to say that I fiddled with all possible combinations of settings and name/location of the file with no result. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
The message is too big perhaps. I'll post again in small chuncks as soon as I have the chance. In the meanwhile a 16.04 user reported the scanner failure, apparently due to a libsane1 update. See https://forum.ubuntu-it.org/viewtopic.php?f=9=624458 page two, this is what he gets with sane-find-scanner # sane-find-scanner will now attempt to detect your scanner. If the # result is different from what you expected, first make sure your # scanner is powered up and properly connected to your computer. # No SCSI scanners found. If you expected something different, make sure that # you have loaded a kernel SCSI driver for your SCSI adapter. could not open USB device 0x1d6b/0x0002 at 002:001: Access denied (insufficient permissions) could not open USB device 0x1d6b/0x0001 at 006:001: Access denied (insufficient permissions) could not open USB device 0x1d6b/0x0001 at 005:001: Access denied (insufficient permissions) could not open USB device 0x04f2/0xb012 at 001:005: Access denied (insufficient permissions) found USB scanner (vendor=0x04f9 [Brother], product=0x01f5 [MFC-5490CN]) at libusb:001:004 could not open USB device 0x18d1/0x4ee7 at 001:003: Access denied (insufficient permissions) could not open USB device 0x1d6b/0x0002 at 001:001: Access denied (insufficient permissions) could not open USB device 0x1d6b/0x0001 at 004:001: Access denied (insufficient permissions) could not open USB device 0x1c4f/0x0003 at 003:003: Access denied (insufficient permissions) could not open USB device 0x1d6b/0x0001 at 003:001: Access denied (insufficient permissions) # Your USB scanner was (probably) detected. It may or may not be supported by # SANE. Try scanimage -L and read the backend's manpage. # Not checking for parallel port scanners. # Most Scanners connected to the parallel port or other proprietary ports # can't be detected by this program. # You may want to run this program as root to find all devices. Once you # found the scanner devices, be sure to adjust access permissions as # necessary. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Hi Staedtler, I knew You were right, but I gave it a try; too bad Brother sold a linux supported product while in fact they give no support, and not a good after sale service for a 10 months old product. This is (in short) the debugging output: 'sane-find-scanner' output -- snip found USB scanner (vendor=0x04f9 [Brother], product=0x035d [MFC-1910W]) at libusb:002:006 -- snip 'scanimage -L' [sanei_debug] Setting debug level of dll to 255. [dll] sane_init: SANE dll backend version 1.0.13 from sane-backends 1.0.27 [dll] sane_init/read_dlld: attempting to open directory `./dll.d' [dll] sane_init/read_dlld: attempting to open directory `/etc/sane.d/dll.d' [dll] sane_init/read_dlld: using config directory `/etc/sane.d/dll.d' [dll] sane_init/read_dlld: considering /etc/sane.d/dll.d/iscan [dll] sane_init/read_config: reading dll.d/iscan [dll] add_backend: adding backend `epkowa' [dll] sane_init/read_dlld: done. [dll] sane_init/read_config: reading dll.conf [dll] add_backend: adding backend `net' [dll] add_backend: adding backend `abaton' [dll] add_backend: adding backend `agfafocus' [dll] add_backend: adding backend `apple' [dll] add_backend: adding backend `avision' [dll] add_backend: adding backend `artec' [dll] add_backend: adding backend `artec_eplus48u' [dll] add_backend: adding backend `as6e' [dll] add_backend: adding backend `bh' [dll] add_backend: adding backend `canon' [dll] add_backend: adding backend `canon630u' [dll] add_backend: adding backend `canon_dr' [dll] add_backend: adding backend `cardscan' [dll] add_backend: adding backend `coolscan' [dll] add_backend: adding backend `coolscan3' [dll] add_backend: adding backend `dell1600n_net' [dll] add_backend: adding backend `dmc' [dll] add_backend: adding backend `epkowa' [dll] add_backend: `epkowa' is already there -- snip -- plenty of lines here, no brother backend though; backends are listed in aphabetical order, copy-pasted the text up to 'epkowa', which is the Epson Perfection 4490 Photo scanner (unplugged), since it is one of the scanners that do not work without tinkering with the backend location [dll] sane_get_devices -- snip -- plenty of text here too, no brother backend found and loaded, I include the Epson Perfection lines [dll] load: searching backend `epkowa' in `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sane' [dll] load: trying to load `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sane/libsane-epkowa.so.1' [dll] load: dlopen()ing `/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sane/libsane-epkowa.so.1' [dll] init: initializing backend `epkowa' [dll] init: backend `epkowa' is version 1.0.213 -- snip [dll] sane_get_devices: found 0 devices No scanners were identified. If you were expecting something different, check that the scanner is plugged in, turned on and detected by the sane-find-scanner tool (if appropriate). Please read the documentation which came with this software (README, FAQ, manpages). [dll] sane_exit: exiting [dll] sane_exit: calling backend `xerox_mfp's exit function -- snip -- plenty of text again, no brother backend, I include the Epson Perfection lines. It's in reverse alphabetical order, except for the net backend [dll] sane_exit: calling backend `epkowa's exit function [dll] sane_exit: calling backend `dmc's exit function [dll] sane_exit: calling backend `dell1600n_net's exit function [dll] sane_exit: calling backend `coolscan3's exit function [dll] sane_exit: calling backend `coolscan's exit function [dll] sane_exit: calling backend `cardscan's exit function [dll] sane_exit: calling backend `canon_dr's exit function [dll] sane_exit: calling backend `canon630u's exit function [dll] sane_exit: calling backend `canon's exit function [dll] sane_exit: calling backend `bh's exit function [dll] sane_exit: calling backend `artec_eplus48u's exit function [dll] sane_exit: calling backend `artec's exit function [dll] sane_exit: calling backend `avision's exit function [dll] sane_exit: calling backend `apple's exit function [dll] sane_exit: calling backend `agfafocus's exit function [dll] sane_exit: calling backend `abaton's exit function [dll] sane_exit: calling backend `net's exit function [dll] sane_exit: finished 'xsane' does not see the scanner; and now 'sudo sane-find-scanner' -- snip found USB scanner (vendor=0x04f9 [Brother], product=0x035d [MFC-1910W]) at libusb:002:006 -- snip 'sudo scanimage -L' gave no output except the "No scanners were identified" message; I realized debug was off, and ran 'sudo export SANE_DEBUG_DLL=255' which gave "command not found" the following is the output after 'su root', 'SANE_DEBUG_DLL=255', and 'sane-find-scanner' -- snip found USB scanner (vendor=0x04f9 [Brother], product=0x035d [MFC-1910W]) at libusb:002:006 -- snip
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Hy all, just here to write that after exchanging a bunch of useless emails with a kind chap from Brother customer support, he finally redirected me to the "lab technicians", who wrote to me "read the faq, or check over internet if there are solutions from the community". -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Hi staedtler-przyborski, I created the /etc/udev/rules.d/79-udev- brother.rules file as suggested, no joy. I have written to Brother support, asking if they're planning the release of drivers libsane1 compliant; I've had an automatic reply suggesting to install the non working driver... hope I'll get a proper answer anytime soon, I fear they won't support legacy hardware, but they should indeed support recent products. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Yep, vuescan is the commercial software I was referring to in my previous post, and yes, I tried the ugly workaround as soon as Hans Schwimmbeck posted it, and it used to work, but it prevents from updating too many packages due to a daisy chain of dependencies; I do not even know if I could reinstall it now that it's been removed and the system has been updated, but surely uninstalling it hasn't been easy. As a matter of fact the developers should fix what they broke, or the hardware manufacturer should rewrite the drivers against libsane1, which is very unlikely, especially for old peripherals. Any other solution requiring user action is a workaround, not a bug fix, but I'd be very happy to take action to resurrect the Brother scanner, if I only knew where to stick my hands! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Further tested the Brother MFC-1910W with gscan2pdf, no joy even as root. Also tested with a commercial scanning software, a 13.5 MB download supporting current and "vintage" scanners, the Brother MFC- 1910W works out of the box as a user. :-(( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Tried to configure the Brother MFC-1910W as a network scanner, same outcome: it only work with xsane (no simple-scan) as the true root user (no sudo xscan). TBC -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
@staedtler-przyborski I'm on xorg... I forgot to mention: the Brother scanner only works as root AND with xsane, simple-scan doesn't work at all. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Hi staedtler-przyborski, and thank You for taking the time to further investigate the matter. Yes indeed, I did try to install the brother- udev-rule-type1 package You kindly linked, also tinkering with the various settings, and tested with a later release too, even if both weren't needed in zesty, nor in xenial (I guess that the package was required with earlier ubuntu releases), but it doesn't make any difference: the scanner is found by sane-find-scanner, but is not detected by scanimage -l, and it only works running xsane from the terminal after the 'su root' command, while 'sudo xsane' won't work at all. I'm quite sure that it's a permission issue, but I'm out of ideas as to how to fix it, and using the scanner as root is not a feasible option. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Thank You for Your time Hans, I do not like 0777 as well, but I was shooting in
the dark. As stated, I tried
## Brother MFC-1910W
ATTRS{idVendor}=="04f9", ATTRS{idProduct}=="035d", MODE="0666",
GROUP="scanner", ENV{libsane_matched}="yes" (or 0660 0664 0777 modes)
which should be the equivalent of Your
# Brother brscan3 devices
ATTRS{idVendor}=="04f9", ATTRS{idProduct}=="*", MODE="0664", GROUP="scanner",
ENV{libsane_matched}="yes"
no joy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012
Title:
Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
PS I'm on brscan 4. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
The Brother MFC-1910W printer-fax-scanner, brscan4 based, does not work
with the symlink trick, the scanner is detected by sane-find-scanner,
but is not listed by scanimage -l, and will only work after enabling the
root account and issuing the 'su root' and 'xsane' commands in a
terminal; a simple sudo xsane won't work. Although it seems to me a
permission issue, creating appropriate (to the best of my knowledge!)
udev rules files in the /etc/udev/rules.d directory and/or in
/lib/udev/rules.d directory has no positive outcome, nor editing the the
/lib/udev/rules.d/60-libsane1.rules file; my attempts were using the
lines
## Brother MFC-1910W
ATTRS{idVendor}=="04f9", ATTRS{idProduct}=="035d", MODE="0666",
GROUP="scanner", ENV{libsane_matched}="yes"
with several flavours of the MODE= option (0660 0666 0664 0777 and the like).
Again: if only libsane1 will also look for sane backends in the "legacy"
locations other than the new ones perhaps this insane mess would be sorted out.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012
Title:
Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
I can confirm that the Epson Perfection 4490 Photo scanner, iscan- gt-x750-bundle-1.0.0.x64 based, works by creating symlinks of the /usr/lib/sane/libsane-epkowa* files into the /usr/lib/x86_64-linux- gnu/sane directory by issuing the command 'sudo ln -sfr /usr/lib/sane /libsane-epkowa* /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sane' as said above; no need to tinker with the udev rules files in my case. This doesn't look like a bug fix to me, it's a workaround, needing a user tweak, libsane1 should look for third party sane drivers (once called backends IIRC) in the "legacy" directories as well as in the new ones, for backward compatibility. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1728012] Re: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change
Cross posting from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane- backends/+bug/1707352?comments=all On artful, libsane1 1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2.1, in short: the Epson 4490 Photo scanner doesn't work, the Brother MDC-1910W scanner only works as root; both were fully working on zesty. In details: Epson 4490 Photo as user sane-find-scanner detects a bunch of USB devices including the scanner, but has not enough permission scanimage -l no SANE devices found iscan, simple-scan, and xsane do not work Epson 4490 Photo as root sane-find-scanner ok scanimage -l no SANE devices found iscan, simple-scan, and xsane do not work Brother MFC-1910W as user sane-find-scanner detects a bunch of USB devices including the scanner, but has not enough permission scanimage -l no SANE devices found simple-scan and xsane do not work Brother MFC-1910W as root sane-find-scanner ok scanimage -l ok simple-scan ok xsane ok -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728012 Title: Many 3rd party scanner drivers are broken by a sane change To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1728012/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane
Hi there, I uninstalled the ugly workaround and purged the zesty packages sane, libsane, xsane, scanner drivers, and all the bells and whistles; reinstalled libsane1 1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2.1, sane, xsane, simple-scan, Brother and Epson drivers with no issues. In short: the Epson 4490 Photo scanner doesn't work at all, the Brother MDC-1910W scanner only works as root. In details: Epson 4490 Photo as user sane-find-scanner detects a bunch of USB devices including the scanner, but has not enough permission scanimage -l no SANE devices found iscan, simple-scan, and xsane do not work Epson 4490 Photo as root sane-find-scanner ok scanimage -l no SANE devices found iscan, simple-scan, and xsane do not work Brother MFC-1910W as user sane-find-scanner detects a bunch of USB devices including the scanner, but has not enough permission scanimage -l no SANE devices found simple-scan and xsane do not work Brother MFC-1910W as root sane-find-scanner ok scanimage -l ok simple-scan ok xsane ok -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707352 Title: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug- ins for sane To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1707352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane
Still on the ugly workaround, while the Epson 4490 scanner keeps working, I further tested with my Brother MFC 1910W printer/scanner, which used to work on zesty. Xsane doesn't see the scanner, it only works as root, that isn't even running sudo xsane, but taking the risk to assign a password to root and running the terminal, su root, giving the newly created password and issuing the xsane command. This is no matter what: I tried to add the relevant lines to the /lib/udev/rules.d/60-libsane.rules file, adding the user to the saned and the scanner groups, thinkering with the /etc/sane.d/dll.conf file, and everything I could possibly think of. Printing works as usual. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707352 Title: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug- ins for sane To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1707352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane
The ugly workaround from Hans Schwimmbeck works for me with the Epson 4490 scanner (iscan gtx 750 bundle). During install I was required to allow the uninstall of the colord package, which I did, reinstalling it soon after; strangely the removal of colord didn't remove gnome related stuff as experienced in previous attempts to play with the zesty libsane (?!?!?). Other than issuing the hold command in the terminal I've also had to pin the relevant packages within synaptic, or else the software updater would try to upgrade libsane to libsane1 (?!?!? again). This so called ugly workaround is the most elegant solution available at the moment IMHO, thank You for sharing Hans; my workaround (post #16) was preventing the upgrade of many packages, while this supposedly ugly fix doesn't. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707352 Title: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug- ins for sane To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1707352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane
Dear Jeremy, if this "Please keep the comments respectful." is addressed to me, since english is not my first language I want to clarify that I did not mean to be unrespectful; what I mean is that this looks more like a wart rather than a bug to me, please don't take this personal, and I'm ready to publicly apologize for taking apples for oranges if I was wrong, in the meanwhile no offense intended. And I'm not upset, just willing to help up fixing this hiccup. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707352 Title: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug- ins for sane To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1707352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane
Installing xenial lts right now, but what if libsane1 will survive despite the fact that it breaks compatibility with many scanners out in the wild? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707352 Title: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug- ins for sane To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1707352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane
...obsolete by an arbitrary development (mis)decision. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707352 Title: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug- ins for sane To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1707352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane
Installed libsane1 1.0.27-1~experimental2ubuntu2 and the Epson driver doesn't complain about the unmet dependancies anymore, it won't properly install however, resulting in a broken package, impossible to fix, only option is to remove it. This is not a bug IMHO, renaming the package is "operator error", and an insane decision. Wouldn't it be easier to just stick to the working naming instead of messing around with iffy tricks to get this piece of software in a working state? As an early Linux addict, from the 90s Slackware days, this is the first time I feel like being on MS Windows, with fully working hardware to be replaced because becoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707352 Title: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug- ins for sane To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1707352/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1707352] Re: the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-ins for sane
Hi all, as a workaround on ubuntu artful I got rolled back to libsane
libsane-common from zesty, that is 1.0.25+git20150528-1ubuntu4, and xsane
xsane-common 0999.3ubuntu2, locked to those releases; my Epson Perfection 4490
scanner (third party epkowa backend) would only run as root; added the lines
# Epson Perfection 4490
ATTRS{idVendor}=="04b8", ATTRS{idProduct}=="0119", ENV{libsane_matched}="yes"
to the file /lib/udev/rules.d/60-libsane.rules right after the line
LABEL="libsane_usb_rules_begin"
and the scanner is now working as it always did.
Would be great if this libsane1 thing would be fixed though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707352
Title:
the change from libsane to libsane1 broke many (all?) 3rd party plug-
ins for sane
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sane-backends/+bug/1707352/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134660] Re: Ralink rt2400 / rt2500 / rt2570 / rt61 / rt73 do not work out of the box in Gutsy/Hardy
After a few days of testing I want to tell to all of us struggling with a hardy kernel on top of gutsy that the best way to go is to install hardy: everything works much better in hardy than in gutsy with updated kernel, wicd a must AFAICT. I also have to say that things are working better than before but we're not there yet: the hardware dies after a few hours online, while it used to die after a bunch of minutes before; this is an improvement but things are not working as they should and some more work has to be done. This is in regard of the rt73 dongle, still no luck with the rt2570 as of today. Regarding the linux-backports-modules-hardy package: I installed this too but did not notice any benefit, how do I make sure the kernel is loading the backport modules instead of the default ones? Going to the /lib/modules directory shows that both modules are installed in different locations and I really do not know how to verify which generation of module is being loaded. A nice weekend to everybody, luca -- Ralink rt2400 / rt2500 / rt2570 / rt61 / rt73 do not work out of the box in Gutsy/Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134660] Re: Ralink rt2400 / rt2500 / rt2570 / rt61 / rt73 do not work out of the box in Gutsy/Hardy
Hello world, I've set up a wpa2 with tkip/aes encryption network and the rt73 dongle is working via network manager in hardy with 2.6.24-16-generic kernel (32-bit); I tried to open 35 tabs at once in firefox while downloading ubuntu's updates and playing videos from websites, it's been working so far, the only thing being that the connection info window in network manager states a 1 mb/s speed while it is 54 mb/s according to iwconfig. I may test the rt2570 dongle sometimes and report on it soon after. ciao luca -- Ralink rt2400 / rt2500 / rt2570 / rt61 / rt73 do not work out of the box in Gutsy/Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134660] Re: Ralink rt2400 / rt2500 / rt2570 / rt61 / rt73 do not work out of the box in Gutsy/Hardy
Sorry to verify that the rt2570 dongle above mentioned does not work period. Regarding the rt73 dongle: upon restart both network manager and/or manual configuration ask for wpa password while the network is configured for wpa2, I switched to wicd and it works much better now: it retains the correct password for the proper wpa2 configuration, moreover, no need to enter the keyring manager password too; as the rt73 stick is working I'll quit thinkering with it, while I'm going to test the rt2570 stick with the linux-backports-modules. ciao again luca -- Ralink rt2400 / rt2500 / rt2570 / rt61 / rt73 do not work out of the box in Gutsy/Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134660] Re: Ralink rt2400 / rt2500 / rt2570 / rt61 / rt73 do not work out of the box in Gutsy/Hardy
Hi everybody, I took a test drive on gutsy with hardy's 2.6.24-16 generic 32-bit kernel: my rt73 dongle works (wep 128, no network manager); the other dongle I own wich is rt2570 based does not work at all as usual; I could not test on a fresh install of hardy as trying to open the network configuration app would stall the computer with a suspicious repeated clicking of the hard drives (?!) I'll try wpa as soon as I can spare some time and report back. ciao luca -- Ralink rt2400 / rt2500 / rt2570 / rt61 / rt73 do not work out of the box in Gutsy/Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134660] Re: Ralink rt2400 / rt2500 / rt2570 / rt61 / rt73 do not work out of the box in Gutsy/Hardy
More on the previous post: I booted hardy and did not bother to try manual network configuration but went the network manager route; I can now confirm that the rt73 stick works (it's on right now) while the rt2570 does not (still talking of wep as wpa has never been an option with my hardware), there's an improvement however, as the rt2570 dongle now connects via network manager even if the connection itself is very bad and unfit for normal use; I'll try to set up a wpa network and doing tests in such an environment as soon as I can. ciao again luca -- Ralink rt2400 / rt2500 / rt2570 / rt61 / rt73 do not work out of the box in Gutsy/Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134660] Re: Ralink rt2400 / rt2500 / rt2570 / rt61 / rt73 do not work out of the box in Gutsy/Hardy
Dear You all, I own an Asus WL-167G wi-fi dongle rt2570 based and it does not work with hardy's 2.6.24-12-generic kernel 32-bit installed on top of gutsy; I also have a D-Link DWL-G122 dongle rt73 based dongle that works very well with the very same kernel on the same computer; however a full install of hardy would not run on this box as the all usb subsystem is messed up: I have Logitech wireless usb keyboard and mouse that do not work at all with hardy ever since alpha 3, rendering my box unusable even for beta testing -- Ralink rt2400 / rt2500 / rt2570 / rt61 / rt73 do not work out of the box in Gutsy/Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134660] Re: Ralink rt2400 / rt2500 / rt2570 / rt61 / rt73 do not work out of the box in Gutsy/Hardy
More about the above post: I did test the dongles on another box, an Athlon 2800 running gutsy, I've installed hardy's 2.6.24-12 kernel and the WL-167G stick does not work as on the other machine (Intel dual core); also the D-Link DWL-G122 worked fine for a bunch of minutes and then died, I've had to reboot to get it working again for a while. The beheaviour is not the same on different hardware platforms, I hope this info helps to nail down the bug(s). -- Ralink rt2400 / rt2500 / rt2570 / rt61 / rt73 do not work out of the box in Gutsy/Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 134660] Re: Ralink rt2400 / rt2500 / rt2570 / rt61 / rt73 do not work out of the box in Gutsy/Hardy
hi there, running gutsy with a 2.6.24-5 hardy kernel, tested with both a rt2570 and a rt73 usb sticks with no positive outcome: both cards go off (no blinking led, no connection) after a bunch of minutes online, the only way to restore a connection is to restart the computer as simply disconnecting-reinserting the stick and/or restarting the network service does not do the trick; moreover, the serialmonkey modules would not compile, even after installing the hardy's build essential and libc etc. I've decided not to test 2.6.24-8 as I've read the post from NoWhereMan, and I'm here in nowhereland waiting for a new kernel update, in the meanwhile I'm back to gutsy's 2.6.22 kernel with serialmonkey's modules (which is not exactly working well either). These cards work quite well with both winxp sp2 and osx 10.4.9. -- Ralink rt2400 / rt2500 / rt2570 / rt61 / rt73 do not work out of the box in Gutsy/Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134660 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 189338] [NEW] v4l does not compile with kernel 2.6.24-5
Public bug reported: I'm running gutsy with hardy's 2.6.24-5 kernel complete with headers/sources and related build essentials/libc etc packages: no way to compile source code from mercurial v4l-dvb-kernel: error code 2, and, by the way, as a matter of fact no way to compile the serialmonkey source as well (yes I'm struggling with the nasty ralink dongles bug too, and I get error code 2 when trying to compile those modules either); feel free to enquire for additional info if You wish. Best regards Luca ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- v4l does not compile with kernel 2.6.24-5 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189338 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 156841] Re: wusb54g doesn't work with 7.10
I do agree, but the rt2500usb module works pretty well in both fedora 7-8 and suse 10.3, please have a look at https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-restricted- modules-2.6.22/+bug/18 -- wusb54g doesn't work with 7.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/156841 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 144448] Re: rt2500usb module not working with asus wl-167g wifi stick
Daniel This looks similar with bug #147811. I have the same problem. I do agree with ^that^, this is the same that's happening to me I have posted my log files on the other bug report. regarding Your dmesg: [ 218.108000] ieee80211_init: failed to initialize WME (err=-17) [ 218.12] iwlwifi_rc80211_simple: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_rate_control_unregister [ 218.12] iwlwifi_rc80211_simple: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_sta_info_put [ 218.12] iwlwifi_rc80211_simple: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_sta_info_get [ 218.12] iwlwifi_rc80211_simple: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_rate_control_register You get the error 17 too Also, here is lsusb and lspci. The Asus adapter si the one on usb (Bus 004 Device 002: ID 174f:a311) this is a device id that I do not know of, perhaps a very recent stick? Anyhow all those different flavours of Asus sticks seem to share the same code, and hidden somewhere there must a typo! -- rt2500usb module not working with asus wl-167g wifi stick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 147811] Re: Ubuntu 7.10 Wireless Interface WEP password login problem with Asus WL-167G Usb Wlan Adapter
Vittorio, I get this very same problem with/without wep, could You please post the outputs of the following commands: lsusb dmesg ifconfig iwconfig Daniel, forgive me for double posting here and on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18 This looks similar with bug #147811. I have the same problem. I do agree with ^that^, this is the same that's happening to me I have posted my log files on the other bug report. regarding Your dmesg: [ 218.108000] ieee80211_init: failed to initialize WME (err=-17) [ 218.12] iwlwifi_rc80211_simple: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_rate_control_unregister [ 218.12] iwlwifi_rc80211_simple: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_sta_info_put [ 218.12] iwlwifi_rc80211_simple: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_sta_info_get [ 218.12] iwlwifi_rc80211_simple: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_rate_control_register You get the error 17 too Also, here is lsusb and lspci. The Asus adapter si the one on usb (Bus 004 Device 002: ID 174f:a311) this is a device id that I do not know of, perhaps a very recent stick? Anyhow all those different flavours of Asus sticks seem to share the same code, and hidden somewhere there must a typo! -- Ubuntu 7.10 Wireless Interface WEP password login problem with Asus WL-167G Usb Wlan Adapter https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147811 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 144448] Re: rt2500usb module not working with asus wl-167g wifi stick
Thank You for taking the time to deal with this. Yes. But rt2x00 is a driver for several chips. So if rt2x00 is update, it may help you too. I'm sorry it does not help; I also took a test with the latest 2.6.22-14 kernel with no success, the only thing I spotted is from dmesg: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dmesg |grep ieee802 [ 43.096306] ieee80211_init: failed to initialize WME (err=-17) [ 43.112825] iwlwifi_rc80211_simple: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_rate_control_unregister [ 43.112962] iwlwifi_rc80211_simple: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_rate_control_register According to your ifconfig and iwconfig output, your wireless interface got an ip (192.168.1.13), and is connected to an AccessPoint. So what about the dhcp server ? Can you ping your router (may be 192.168.1.1) ? the card has an ip because it is configured for static ip, it can only ping itself Driver include in Ubuntu isn't rt2570 one, it's the new rt2x00 that will be release with future kernel. yes indeed but downloading-compiling-loading the rt2570 module (blacklisting the rt2x00) gives me a working network. Thank You for Your attention -- rt2500usb module not working with asus wl-167g wifi stick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 144448] Re: rt2500usb module not working with asus wl-167g wifi stick
Hi there, as a new kernel is out I was coming to give You an update, and here it is; thank You for pointing me to https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139070 but the stick I'm talking about is an rt25 card not an rt73 one. So, new kernel, same behaviour, here it is the details: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -rvm 2.6.22-13-generic #1 SMP Thu Oct 4 17:18:44 GMT 2007 i686 dmesg output: what is this wmaster0 thing? ---snip--- [ 47.551086] usbcore: registered new interface driver hci_usb [ 47.922760] ieee80211_init: failed to initialize WME (err=-17) [ 47.935668] iwlwifi_rc80211_simple: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_rate_control_unregister [ 47.935710] iwlwifi_rc80211_simple: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_sta_info_put [ 47.935745] iwlwifi_rc80211_simple: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_sta_info_get [ 47.935799] iwlwifi_rc80211_simple: Unknown symbol iwlwifi_ieee80211_rate_control_register [ 47.948378] wmaster0: Selected rate control algorithm 'simple' [ 48.002202] usbcore: registered new interface driver rt2500usb [ 48.054484] PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:11.6 to 64 [ 48.371347] NET: Registered protocol family 10 [ 48.371464] lo: Disabled Privacy Extensions [ 48.371539] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): eth0: link is not ready [ 48.371580] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_UP): wlan0: link is not ready [ 48.558119] ACPI: PCI interrupt for device :00:11.6 disabled [ 48.558136] VIA 82xx Modem: probe of :00:11.6 failed with error -13 [ 48.558410] ACPI: PCI Interrupt :00:11.5[C] - GSI 22 (level, low) - IRQ 19 [ 48.558553] PCI: Setting latency timer of device :00:11.5 to 64 [ 48.865372] wlan0: Initial auth_alg=0 [ 48.865379] wlan0: authenticate with AP 00:14:c1:1f:1f:e0 [ 48.867136] wlan0: RX authentication from 00:14:c1:1f:1f:e0 (alg=0 transaction=2 status=0) [ 48.867139] wlan0: authenticated [ 48.867142] wlan0: associate with AP 00:14:c1:1f:1f:e0 [ 48.869374] wlan0: RX AssocResp from 00:14:c1:1f:1f:e0 (capab=0x411 status=0 aid=1) [ 48.869378] wlan0: associated [ 48.870416] ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): wlan0: link becomes ready [ 49.071708] codec_read: codec 0 is not valid [0xfe] [ 49.077951] codec_read: codec 0 is not valid [0xfe] [ 49.084236] codec_read: codec 0 is not valid [0xfe] [ 49.090480] codec_read: codec 0 is not valid [0xfe] [ 49.433469] wlan0: duplicate address detected! ---snip--- lsusb output, do not bother with the Broadcom device as it is a bluetooth dongle: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsusb Bus 005 Device 002: ID 04b4:6560 Cypress Semiconductor Corp. CY7C65640 USB-2.0 TetraHub Bus 005 Device 001: ID : Bus 005 Device 004: ID 0b05:1706 ASUSTek Computer, Inc. Bus 001 Device 001: ID : Bus 004 Device 001: ID : Bus 003 Device 002: ID 0a5c:2101 Broadcom Corp. Bus 003 Device 001: ID : Bus 002 Device 001: ID : according to Asus: 0B05:1706 rt25USB 0B05:1707 rt25USB 0B05:1723 rt73 0B05:1724 rt73 a couple of sifted lsusb outputs: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsmod |grep rt2 rt2500usb 22016 0 rt2x00usb 12032 1 rt2500usb rt2x00lib19584 2 rt2500usb,rt2x00usb rfkill8208 1 rt2x00lib mac80211 171016 3 rc80211_simple,rt2x00usb,rt2x00lib input_polldev 5896 1 rt2x00lib crc_itu_t3072 1 rt2x00lib usbcore 138248 6 rt2500usb,rt2x00usb,hci_usb,ehci_hcd,uhci_hcd [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lsmod |grep 80211 rc80211_simple 6912 1 mac80211 171016 3 rc80211_simple,rt2x00usb,rt2x00lib cfg802117304 1 mac80211 iwconfig output: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ iwconfig lono wireless extensions. eth0 no wireless extensions. wmaster0 no wireless extensions. wlan0 IEEE 802.11g ESSID:c4s4 Mode:Managed Frequency:2.437 GHz Access Point: 00:14:C1:1F:1F:E0 Retry min limit:7 RTS thr:off Fragment thr=2346 B Link Signal level=-59 dBm Rx invalid nwid:0 Rx invalid crypt:0 Rx invalid frag:0 Tx excessive retries:0 Invalid misc:0 Missed beacon:0 ifconfig output: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ifconfig eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0C:6E:9C:B7:91 UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:0 (0.0 b) Interrupt:16 eth0:avah Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0C:6E:9C:B7:91 inet addr:169.254.8.110 Bcast:169.254.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 UP BROADCAST MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 Interrupt:16 loLink encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:219 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0
Re: [Bug 144448] Re: rt2500usb module not working with asus wl-167g wifi stick
Id2ndR wrote: Hi, According to $ modinfo rt2500usb | grep -i v0b05p1706 The module should be loaded with your device. Is your device using rt73 with cvs version ? What are the loaded module ($ lsmod | grep rt) with cvs version ? I'm not at the box now, anyhow: yes the rt2500usb module is loaded, wlan0 is there, but the thing does not work (signal strenght stays at zero as stated) and no it's not an rt73; the cvs is the old rt2570 from serialmonkey, several versions downloaded recently at different times. For Your information the rt2500usb module from both fedora 7 and suse 10.3 rc1 works very well with this device (fedora works better as suse goes off randomly). Please feel free to contact me again if You need additional info. Luca M. Gazzolo -- rt2500usb module not working with asus wl-167g wifi stick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 120822] Re: when switching to dual-monitor, log out, log in, resolution is reset
I came across the same misbeheaviour on a desktop with an nvidia 6600 card: after changing resolution I have to run Synaptic and reinstall the nvidia-glx package, after this voodoo like procedure the resolution stays as set even after log out. -- when switching to dual-monitor, log out, log in, resolution is reset https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120822 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 144448] rt2500usb module not working with asus wl-167g wifi stick
Public bug reported: Stick details as from lsusb: Bus 005 Device 004: ID 0b05:1706 ASUSTek Computer, Inc., this thing used to work out of the box in feisty. It does not work in gutsy with kernel 2.6.22-12-generic i686 (and previous): card is detected but signal strenght stays at zero and no way it will connect to the network either with manual configuration (network-admin applet) and or NetworkManager; tested also with wicd 1.3.1 with no success. As a workaround I blacklisted rt2500usb, rt2x00usb, rt2x00lib and downloaded-compiled-loaded the cvs version of the rt2570 module from serialmonkey (the v1.1.0-b2 release would not compile), now everything works and the network applet is showing WPA- WPA2 as available (I'm using wep as this was the only choice with feisty); I also have to report that as of rt2570-cvs-2007092201 the stick works on a multiprocessor Athlon MP box too. Thank You for Your attention Luca M. Gazzolo ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- rt2500usb module not working with asus wl-167g wifi stick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 80297] Re: sata_via not working anymore - kernel 2.6.20
Ben, thank You for Your attention. Of course there's a typo in my last post: 2.6.2.-rc6 should read 2.6.20-rc6, moreover I'm running 2.6.20-8-generic i686 at the moment and it is fine so far. -- sata_via not working anymore - kernel 2.6.20 https://launchpad.net/bugs/80297 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 80297] Re: sata_via not working anymore - kernel 2.6.20
With the feisty 2.6.2.-rc6 kernel sata via is back to normal! However I downloaded the stable 2.6.20 kernel and compiled it with the feisty 2.6.20-rc6 config file and the resulting kernel would go past the sata via initialization but will stop at the raid initialization stage. Compiled again with no raid support results in a fully booting kernel. -- sata_via not working anymore - kernel 2.6.20 https://launchpad.net/bugs/80297 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 80297] sata_via not working anymore - kernel 2.6.20
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.20 Both kernel 2.6.19 (Ubuntu and Fedora) and 2.6.20 (Ubuntu) do not boot: when probing sata hardware the system is unable to correctly identify the hard disks on a system with a PCI Via VT6420 sata raid controller and a couple of Seagate hard disks. Another box with an embedded Via VT8237 sata controller and a single Maxtor HD does not boot with the same malfunction too. Please see http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7641 and/or http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7415 as I could not explain it any better. ** Affects: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- sata_via not working anymore - kernel 2.6.20 https://launchpad.net/bugs/80297 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 80297] Re: sata_via not working anymore - kernel 2.6.20
I may add that these very same computers where working fine with both Ubuntu kernel 2.6.17 and Fedora 2.6.16. -- sata_via not working anymore - kernel 2.6.20 https://launchpad.net/bugs/80297 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
