from:" Christian Ehrhardt "

Thanks for doing that and thanks for the little session reminding me
again of the extra-removals I've forgotten about. Totally applies in
this case.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072723

Title:
  please remove jupyter-ydoc due to dependency-wait on ypy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jupyter-ydoc/+bug/2072723/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063062] Re: Please remove src:cryptojs ; unmaintained and deprecated upstream

Short, simple and correct.
And also stuck at 3.1.2.. since forever due to the same reason.
Thanks for already providing all the references!

it still is in unstable though
And https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/cryptojs points to the new 4.2 version 
(which still is discontinued upstream).

It is right to be removed, what I say is that it might come back.
Debian bug 1056014 blocks it from entering testing and it is unlikely to get 
new uploads.

But if you are concerned consider suggesting a sync-blocklist
(https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+git/sync-blocklist) entry -
WDYT?

Ack
Removing packages from oracular:
cryptojs 3.1.2+dfsg-4 in oracular
libjs-cryptojs 3.1.2+dfsg-4 in oracular amd64
libjs-cryptojs 3.1.2+dfsg-4 in oracular arm64
libjs-cryptojs 3.1.2+dfsg-4 in oracular armhf
libjs-cryptojs 3.1.2+dfsg-4 in oracular i386
libjs-cryptojs 3.1.2+dfsg-4 in oracular ppc64el
libjs-cryptojs 3.1.2+dfsg-4 in oracular riscv64
libjs-cryptojs 3.1.2+dfsg-4 in oracular s390x
Comment: Unmaintained upstream, removed from Debian testing (LP: #2063062)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: cryptojs (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063062

Title:
  Please remove src:cryptojs ; unmaintained and deprecated upstream

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptojs/+bug/2063062/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063392] Re: Please remove obsolete swig3.0

Ack to the case.

It is indeed the same code, but src:swig is evolving and on 4.2.1.
Yes, nothing is depending on swig3.0 anymore.

It is indeed removed in Debian oldstable and later and only bit-rotting
without a use case in Ubuntu.

Removing packages from oracular:
swig3.0 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular
swig3.0 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular amd64
swig3.0 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular arm64
swig3.0 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular armhf
swig3.0 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular ppc64el
swig3.0 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular riscv64
swig3.0 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular s390x
swig3.0-doc 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular amd64
swig3.0-doc 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular arm64
swig3.0-doc 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular armhf
swig3.0-doc 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular i386
swig3.0-doc 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular ppc64el
swig3.0-doc 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular riscv64
swig3.0-doc 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular s390x
swig3.0-examples 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular amd64
swig3.0-examples 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular arm64
swig3.0-examples 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular armhf
swig3.0-examples 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular i386
swig3.0-examples 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular ppc64el
swig3.0-examples 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular riscv64
swig3.0-examples 3.0.12-2.2ubuntu1 in oracular s390x
Comment: Obsolete, duplicate src:swig provides it and is actively maintained 
(LP: #2063392)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.

** Changed in: swig3.0 (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063392

Title:
  Please remove obsolete swig3.0

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/swig3.0/+bug/2063392/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078827] Re: [MIR] luit

FYI: Only waiting on the package subscription to promote this.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078827

Title:
  [MIR] luit

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/luit/+bug/2078827/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078827] Re: [MIR] luit

A quick packaging check seems fine (this isn't a full review as it was in main
already).
d/watch present, d/rules reasonable and lintian sort of happy.
A few like:
W: luit source: build-depends-on-obsolete-package Build-Depends: pkg-config =>
pkgconf
But that isn't a blocker.

The only CVE is super old and not a problem anymore AFAICS.
https://www.cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2009-0141

It is a bit outdated though, with newer releases on:
- 2023-02-05
- 2024-01-02

So we'd usually ask to update it before promotion. But for this special
case let us at least ensure it does not go backward.

---

The old embedded luit is from
cat debian/watch.luit
#git=git://anongit.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/luit
version=3
opts="pgpsigurlmangle=s/$/.sig/" \
https://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/individual/app/ luit-(.*)\.tar\.gz

That had releases until 2012 with v1.1.1.
I compared a lot of
- https://invisible-mirror.net/archives/luit/
vs
- https://xorg.freedesktop.org/releases/individual/app/

going down that route I found the enlightening
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/app/luit/-/commit/2aaa5d75f1b92a5383af676dbd7f0998e26023ac

We're not seriously maintaining this tool, we should stop pretending.
...
This particular version of luit is vestigial. It's been hacked at
randomly since X.Org 6.7, but is not actively maintained and has
known issues. You are almost certainly better off using Thomas Dickey's
version, which can be found at:

http://invisible-island.net/luit/

The changelog of the luit embedded in x11-utils pulls back fixes from the one
we now move to.
example:
233 commit fddfe30c3ff91c83d0484b136e7673764e55

234 Author: Jeremy Huddleston

235 Date: Thu Jul 1 09:35:39 2010 -0700

236

237 Integrate changes from Thomas Dickey's luit-20100601 fork

238

239 * add -alias option to allow override of locale.alias pathname.

240 * improve fix waitForInput as suggested in Freedesktop #26383.

241 * fix warnings from clang --analyze

242

243 Signed-off-by: Jeremy Huddleston

The METRICS section of https://invisible-island.net/luit/ even compares the two.
per release.

It seems this goes back to 2009
https://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/2009-April/044897.html where xorg
forked it, but as shown above has since then stopped maintenance and
recommends the luit we now evaluate here.

The question in regard to "is it ok" essentially is if anything
concerning landed since that makes this require a bigger re-review.
Reading https://invisible-island.net/luit/luit.log.html since ~2010
should match that.

Rough count:
- fix 11
- improve 18
- documentation 6
- features 13
- thereof concerning 0
- Almost all features are furthermore from 2013 and likely would have shown
their brokenness since.

Summary:
- It is the same original codebase orignally
- What we had in main evolved independently for a while under xorg
- Xorg considers their version abandoned and recommends the invisible-islands
version
- That matches how the packaging changed to src:luit now (it is the better
option)
- None of the changes since forked seem concerning

I think we can indeed promoted that as being (almost, actually better)
the same to what we had in main already.

** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2009-0141

** Changed in: luit (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Triaged

--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078827

Title:
[MIR] luit

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/luit/+bug/2078827/+subscriptions

--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078827] Re: [MIR] luit

Thank you Nathan, if it is really "the same broken out and continued in
a different place" that should be fine.

But we found in yesterdays MIR meeting that the changelog says "Removed
luit, which is now packaged separately with a different upstream".

This wording is ambiguous, it could mean:
 a) same code evolving at a new place
 b) something completely new doing the same

So let me have a look...

While doing so you could ask "desktop-packages" (who is the x11-utils
owner this comes from) to get subscribed to luit - as that is a hard
requirement for promoting to main to ensure someone watches over the
package and its bugs.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078827

Title:
  [MIR] luit

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/luit/+bug/2078827/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078827] [NEW] [MIR] luit

Public bug reported:

#Stub#

This is broken out of x11-utils and thereby should be ok to go to main,
but it actually isn't

part of the same in Jammy:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/592958282/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy-
amd64.x11-utils_7.7+5build2_BUILDING.txt.gz

recommends in Noble and later:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/746621535/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular-amd64.x11-utils_7.7+7_BUILDING.txt.gz

The changelog says
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/x11-utils/7.7+6

  * Removed luit, which is now packaged separately with a different
upstream (closes: #1006193, #1003021, #1003130, #816289).  Added
recommends for that package.

Same problem in Noble, but there luit didn't exist and hence was
ignored.

** Affects: luit (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Jeremy Bícha (jbicha)
 Status: Incomplete


** Tags: oracular

** Description changed:

  Stub
  This is broken out of x11-utils and thereby should be ok to go to main, but 
it actually isn't
  
  part of the same in Jammy:
  https://launchpadlibrarian.net/592958282/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy-
  amd64.x11-utils_7.7+5build2_BUILDING.txt.gz
  
  recommends in Noble and later:
  
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/746621535/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular-amd64.x11-utils_7.7+7_BUILDING.txt.gz
  
  The changelog says
  https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/x11-utils/7.7+6
  
-   * Removed luit, which is now packaged separately with a different
- upstream (closes: #1006193, #1003021, #1003130, #816289).  Added
- recommends for that package.
+   * Removed luit, which is now packaged separately with a different
+ upstream (closes: #1006193, #1003021, #1003130, #816289).  Added
+ recommends for that package.
+ 
+ 
+ Same problem in Noble, but there luit didn't exist and hence was ignored.

** Changed in: luit (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Jeremy Bícha (jbicha)

** Description changed:

- Stub
- This is broken out of x11-utils and thereby should be ok to go to main, but 
it actually isn't
+ #Stub#
+ 
+ This is broken out of x11-utils and thereby should be ok to go to main,
+ but it actually isn't
  
  part of the same in Jammy:
  https://launchpadlibrarian.net/592958282/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy-
  amd64.x11-utils_7.7+5build2_BUILDING.txt.gz
  
  recommends in Noble and later:
  
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/746621535/buildlog_ubuntu-oracular-amd64.x11-utils_7.7+7_BUILDING.txt.gz
  
  The changelog says
  https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/x11-utils/7.7+6
  
    * Removed luit, which is now packaged separately with a different
  upstream (closes: #1006193, #1003021, #1003130, #816289).  Added
  recommends for that package.
  
- 
- Same problem in Noble, but there luit didn't exist and hence was ignored.
+ Same problem in Noble, but there luit didn't exist and hence was
+ ignored.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078827

Title:
  [MIR] luit

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/luit/+bug/2078827/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059139] Re: Please remove pngphoon on Noble/armhf

clearing the simple old cases after done with the new:

 pngphoon | 1.3-3build2 | noble/universe| source, amd64, arm64, ppc64el, 
riscv64, s390x
 pngphoon | 1.3-3build2 | oracular/universe | source, amd64, arm64, ppc64el, 
riscv64, s390x

There is no armhf left as of today, so let me mark it complete.

** Changed in: pngphoon (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059139

Title:
  Please remove pngphoon on Noble/armhf

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pngphoon/+bug/2059139/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078056] Re: Remove rust-spytray-adb [s390x]

You are right, that is just what I see and confirm. In excuses [1] it is
blocked for missing the s390x build which in 0.3.2-2 [2] Build-Depends
on adb now. And both are in proposed with the old unusable s390x build
holding it back.

 librust-spytrap-adb-dev | 0.3.2-1 | oracular-proposed/universe | s390x
 librust-spytrap-adb-dev | 0.3.2-2 | oracular-proposed/universe | amd64, arm64, 
armhf, ppc64el, riscv64
 spytrap-adb | 0.3.2-1 | oracular-proposed/universe | s390x
 spytrap-adb | 0.3.2-2 | oracular-proposed/universe | amd64, arm64, 
armhf, ppc64el, riscv64

Ack to the case, removing:
Removing packages from oracular-proposed:
librust-spytrap-adb-dev 0.3.2-1 in oracular s390x
spytrap-adb 0.3.2-1 in oracular s390x
Comment: Depends on adb which isn't available on s390x (LP: #2078056)
Remove [y|N]? y
2 packages successfully removed.

[1]: 
https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html
[2]: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-spytrap-adb/0.3.2-2

** Changed in: rust-spytrap-adb (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078056

Title:
  Remove rust-spytray-adb [s390x]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rust-spytrap-adb/+bug/2078056/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078276] Re: Please remove mes from riscv64

Even in Ubuntu it failed back then [1] already.
Then it didn't even try to build riscv pst focal and until Oracular [2].

Not only did it never build on Debian, whenever it failed on Debian or
on Ubuntu it was different issued. From test failures to even segfaults
while building.

While the last fail seems not "too bad" (only -Wimplicit-function-
declaration - which I somewhat wonder why it is arch dependent) it still
is failing in so many ways each try .. Therefore it seems not to be
ready and stable enough on riscv64 yet. I agree to remove it there to
unblock updating it elsewhere.

And without any reverse dependencies that seems to have not much impact.

Ack to the case:
Removing packages from oracular:
mes 0.26-1 in oracular riscv64
Comment: Flaky and unreliable FTBFS on riscv64 (LP: #2078276)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.


[1]: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mes/0.22-1
[2]: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mes/0.26-1

** Changed in: mes (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078276

Title:
  Please remove mes from riscv64

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mes/+bug/2078276/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078327] Re: [needs-packaging] vision-drivers

FYI I summoned Utkarsh, thanks for having a release team POV.
Accepted now.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078327

Title:
  [needs-packaging] vision-drivers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2078327/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078326] Re: [needs-packaging] ipu7-drivers

FYI I summoned Utkarsh, thanks for having a release team POV.
Accepted now.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078326

Title:
  [needs-packaging] ipu7-drivers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2078326/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078274] Re: Remove zmat [s390x]

Simple and straight forward - thanks.
Ack to the case:

Removing packages from oracular:
libzmat-dev 0.9.8+ds-8 in oracular s390x
libzmat1 0.9.8+ds-8 in oracular s390x
octave-zmat 0.9.8+ds-8 in oracular s390x
Comment: Build-depends on libblosc2-dev which is not available on s390x (LP: 
#2078274)
Remove [y|N]? y
3 packages successfully removed.

But also:

# reverse-depends src:zmat
Reverse-Depends
===
* matlab-jsonlab(for matlab-zmat)
* octave-jsonlab(for octave-zmat)

Now matlab-zmat never existed on s390x.

But octave-jsonlab had:

 octave-jsonlab | 2.9.8-1 | oracular/universe | source, all

And from there into more related:
# reverse-depends  src:octave-jsonlab
Reverse-Depends
===
* jnifti-demos  (for octave-jsonlab)
* matlab-jnifti (for matlab-jsonlab)
* octave-jnifti (for octave-jsonlab)

Yet AFAICS just as in Debian [1] we do not need to modify the rest. They
are uninstallable on s390x now, due to dependencies. But have no s390x
specific binary (=all) that needs to be removed for dependencies (as the
=all we have is good on the other arches).

[1]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1078163

** Changed in: zmat (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078274

Title:
  Remove zmat [s390x]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/zmat/+bug/2078274/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078053] Re: python-refurb: Please RM from Oracular

While primarily being removed related to fastapi I agree that it is
FTBFS on its own tests and the same block other things like mypy.
Without reverse dependencies it can go away and is ok to come back once
it does so from being removed in unstable.

Ack to the case

Removing packages from oracular:
python-refurb 1.27.0-1 in oracular
python3-refurb 1.27.0-1 in oracular amd64
python3-refurb 1.27.0-1 in oracular arm64
python3-refurb 1.27.0-1 in oracular armhf
python3-refurb 1.27.0-1 in oracular i386
python3-refurb 1.27.0-1 in oracular ppc64el
python3-refurb 1.27.0-1 in oracular riscv64
python3-refurb 1.27.0-1 in oracular s390x
refurb 1.27.0-1 in oracular amd64
refurb 1.27.0-1 in oracular arm64
refurb 1.27.0-1 in oracular armhf
refurb 1.27.0-1 in oracular i386
refurb 1.27.0-1 in oracular ppc64el
refurb 1.27.0-1 in oracular riscv64
refurb 1.27.0-1 in oracular s390x
Comment: FTBFS - tests now failing, blocking mypy transition, removed in Debian 
(LP: #2078053)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.

** Changed in: python-refurb (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: mypy (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078053

Title:
  python-refurb: Please RM from Oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mypy/+bug/2078053/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078273] Re: Please remove digikam from NBS architectures

Thanks for linking to the changelog, indeed intentional and controlled.

Gladly those metapackage dependencies are only recommends.
But will they be cleaned up one day?
Probably not too important, certainly not to block on.

Ack to the case.

Removing packages from oracular:
digikam 4:8.3.0-2ubuntu3 in oracular ppc64el
digikam 4:8.3.0-2ubuntu3 in oracular riscv64
digikam 4:8.3.0-2ubuntu3 in oracular s390x
digikam-private-libs 4:8.3.0-2ubuntu3 in oracular ppc64el
digikam-private-libs 4:8.3.0-2ubuntu3 in oracular riscv64
digikam-private-libs 4:8.3.0-2ubuntu3 in oracular s390x
showfoto 4:8.3.0-2ubuntu3 in oracular ppc64el
showfoto 4:8.3.0-2ubuntu3 in oracular riscv64
showfoto 4:8.3.0-2ubuntu3 in oracular s390x
Comment:  Qt webengine is now mandatory, restricting architectures (LP: 
#2078273)
Remove [y|N]? y
9 packages successfully removed.

** Changed in: digikam (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078273

Title:
  Please remove digikam from NBS architectures

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/digikam/+bug/2078273/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078326] Re: [needs-packaging] ipu7-drivers

Thanks for clarifying why we still have ipu6-drivers!

All that was said on bug 2078327 still applies.
And Timo also has uploaded this one.

Checking and accepting if it goes just as well ...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078326

Title:
  [needs-packaging] ipu7-drivers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2078326/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078327] Re: [needs-packaging] vision-drivers

You are confirming on the version what I derived from looking at it -
thanks!

So VCS will be eventually be the normal git Ubuntu link - I'm ok with
that.

In the meantime Timo has uploaded the few small fixes we needed to go on.
Accepting ...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078327

Title:
  [needs-packaging] vision-drivers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2078327/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078566] Re: openfoam: please RM armhf binaries

Ack, this is explicit and intentional in [1].

Removing packages from oracular:
libopenfoam 1912.200626-2build3 in oracular armhf
openfoam 1912.200626-2build3 in oracular armhf
Comment: No more builds on armhf (LP: #2078566)
Remove [y|N]? y
2 packages successfully removed.

[1]: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openfoam/1912.200626-3

** Changed in: openfoam (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078566

Title:
  openfoam: please RM armhf binaries

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openfoam/+bug/2078566/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078567] Re: elpa, gpaw: please RM armhf binaries

More and more packages go the no 32bit (and especially armhf) way...
Ack to the case

Removing packages from oracular-proposed:
gpaw 24.1.0-1build2 in oracular armhf
Comment: No more builds on armhf (LP: #2078567)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.

Removing packages from oracular:
libelpa-dev 2022.11.001-3 in oracular armhf
libelpa19 2022.11.001-3 in oracular armhf
gpaw 24.1.0-1build1 in oracular armhf
Comment: No more builds on armhf (LP: #2078567)
Remove [y|N]? y
3 packages successfully removed.

** Changed in: elpa (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: gpaw (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078567

Title:
  elpa, gpaw: please RM armhf binaries

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elpa/+bug/2078567/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2069138] Re: Demote gccgo binaries (libgo) to universe

Hi Julian,

AFAICS that isn't even intentional anymore.
Just the auto-rescue from src:gcc-1[34] being in main.

[11]:
libgo-13-dev | gcc-13 | Rescued from gcc-13
libgo-14-dev | gcc-14 | Rescued from gcc-14  

The rest then is a long list of things libgo-13-dev and libgo-14-dev
depend on.

If you'd land (maybe have doko and zhjs say that matches how it should
be) the respective `Extra-Exclude:` entries in [2]:supported. Then all
those packages should naturally start to be listed as "move to universe"
in [3].

If we do not add these it would permanently try to come back to main.
And just like so many other versioned packages they will need to be updated, if 
you think there can be a safe wildcard for these it would not happen over and 
over again. Maybe just libgo-[0-9]*-dev?

[1]: 
https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/germinate-output/ubuntu.oracular/all+extra
[2]: git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu
[3]: https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/component-mismatches.html

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069138

Title:
  Demote gccgo binaries (libgo) to universe

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-14/+bug/2069138/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078326] Re: [needs-packaging] ipu7-drivers

Different but related topic

Speaking of updates, obviously looking at ipu7-drivers made me look at 
ipu6-drivers.
That was back then needed when not provided by the kernel yet, just like this 
time ipu7-drivers.
But AFAICS the kernel in Oracular now has it all:

root@o:~# apt-cache show linux-modules-ipu6-6.8.0-31-generic 
linux-modules-ipu6-generic intel-ipu6-dkms
Package: linux-modules-ipu6-6.8.0-31-generic
Architecture: amd64
Version: 6.8.0-31.31
Priority: optional
Section: kernel
Source: linux
Origin: Ubuntu
Maintainer: Ubuntu Kernel Team 
Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug
Installed-Size: 511
Depends: linux-image-6.8.0-31-generic | linux-image-unsigned-6.8.0-31-generic
Filename: 
pool/main/l/linux/linux-modules-ipu6-6.8.0-31-generic_6.8.0-31.31_amd64.deb
Size: 532672
MD5sum: 3211f7e1d43acc311d4e622e6fc86c41
SHA1: 91b782233ac95666727a52d156d23348ce265f02
SHA256: 05303c548c790c874321dbbb80a24a5df96c53a3af69d6833e7791b442348fc5
SHA512: 
90f0e3a0fbb1d59f7d6c6073e0896186187c9a47dbf3b706aba9c0eb1db31f196488e7c40fc678cef9340c93bfe45e65b732da910e1918c959af535571698674
Description-en: Linux kernel ipu6 modules for version 6.8.0-31
 This package provides the Linux kernel ipu6 modules for version
 6.8.0-31.
 .
 You likely do not want to install this package directly. Instead, install the
 one of the linux-modules-ipu6-generic* meta-packages,
 which will ensure that upgrades work correctly, and that supporting packages 
are
 also installed.
Description-md5: b776cd102b9fe2f4af8f7b7f9e7f769e

Package: linux-modules-ipu6-generic
Architecture: amd64
Version: 6.8.0-31.31
Priority: optional
Section: kernel
Source: linux-meta
Origin: Ubuntu
Maintainer: Ubuntu Kernel Team 
Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug
Installed-Size: 16
Provides: intel-ipu6-dkms (= 0~git202311240921.07f0612e-0ubuntu2), ipu6-modules 
(= 0~git202311240921.07f0612e-0ubuntu2), ipu6-prebuilt-kernel (= 
0~git202311240921.07f0612e-0ubuntu2)
Depends: linux-modules-ipu6-6.8.0-31-generic
Filename: 
pool/main/l/linux-meta/linux-modules-ipu6-generic_6.8.0-31.31_amd64.deb
Size: 9914
MD5sum: 0ae02b0e98c2c8bfe2a3a35d3870dd7c
SHA1: 24e14988da5a790a5a9d237845ab5594cba3ddf8
SHA256: 02071174de92fd36c6d05632dcdd681eadb86108c54f1ab5940a73a64dfc6234
SHA512: 
627eef43b7e1b6ec8aca4fbe7a6bd658002128d1d976f7bfbe26d22e0a891e1f573e5fba3f90e93c147fb76708a56f54a57c3311fc2dcc11cfb86846b443af4c
Description-en: Extra drivers for ipu6 for the generic flavour
 Install extra signed ipu6 modules compatible with the generic flavour.
Description-md5: 0a71a5f24c645c598814895c451e69c9


I appreciate you keep it updated - I see 3 oracular uploads.
But could ?should? ipu6-drivers be removed in Oracular instead?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078326

Title:
  [needs-packaging] ipu7-drivers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2078326/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078326] Re: [needs-packaging] ipu7-drivers

Timo sponsored and asked for a New queue review:


# Managing the package namespace
  src:ipu7-drivers
  bin:intel-ipu7-dkms
  Not too short and following the usual model for intel drivers that is already 
used.
  In fact it is the natural continuation of the former ipu7-drivers
=> OK

- Ensuring compliance with the software license
  - The project itself is GPLv2 of Intel - that seems correct.
Also just 2024 is ok in this case

  - Yet the packaging you created in debian/* should be GPLv3
That is the default of Canonical contributions, 
While there is a policy that Canonical makes contributions
to upstream projects under the same license that the project
uses; Debian packaging is not a “contribution to an upstream
project”.  debian/patches is an exception.
Due to that debian/* should please be:
  Copyright: 2024, Canonical Ltd
   
  License: GPL-3.0

=> Please fix this


# Ensuring correct component based on license
Should be ok to go to universe just like many similar PKGs.
=> universe/kernel


# basic packaging check
- This being after vision-drivers I was no more surprised by
  using a git version and no debian watch file.
  While in this case it would have been possible (upstream does
  not have as complex version here) I ack that you'd want to
  follow the same model in all these related packages.
  Ack

- Standards could be 4.7.0, it is new why not start up to date?
  Not a blocker though, but nice if fixed up on the next upload
 
- VCS- entries ought to be pointing at the package maintenance
  So instead of
  https://github.com/intel/ipu7-drivers.git
  It should point at
  
https://code.launchpad.net/~vicamo/ubuntu/+source/ipu7-drivers/+git/ipu7-drivers
  And furthermore, could it there be under a team and not a personal space?

This isn't a deep check, found improvement suggestions, but no red flags on a 
quick pass.
=> OK

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078326

Title:
  [needs-packaging] ipu7-drivers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2078326/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078327] Re: [needs-packaging] vision-drivers

Timo sponsored and asked for a New queue review:

# Managing the package namespace
  src:vision-drivers
  bin:intel-vision-dkms
  Not too short and following the usual model for intel drivers that is already 
used.
=> OK

- Ensuring compliance with the software license
  - The project itself is GPLv2 of Intel - that seems correct.
Development history suggests that is 2023-2024 instead of just 2024
  - Yet the packaging you created in debian/* should be GPLv3
That is the default of Canonical contributions, 
While there is a policy that Canonical makes contributions
to upstream projects under the same license that the project
uses; Debian packaging is not a “contribution to an upstream
project”.  debian/patches is an exception.
Due to that debian/* should please be:
  Copyright: 2024, Canonical Ltd
   
  License: GPL-3.0
=> Please fix this


# Ensuring correct component based on license
Should be ok to go to universe just like many similar PKGs.
=> universe/kernel


# basic packaging check
- after some initial wondering I can see why upstreams version
  "WW33.3_ARL_Vision_Post_Beta" does not work well. I'm personally ok
   with the git revision. I wondered if something that at least includes "33.3"
   would have been better. But then I do not know much about the project and
   that might bit us soon, while your approach is a bit indirect but works well.
  It misses a debian/watch file and hence is easier to forget to update
  I understand that due to the choice of the version this would always
  say there is a mismatch :-/
  But maybe at least provide a debian/README.source telling all others how
  to correctly detect and re-package the archive on the update?
  Eventually I'm fine with it as-is because at least they all (ipu-drivers,
  ivsc-drivers) follow the same model and you demonstrate on the
  others that you can keep them updated - thanks"

- Standards could be 4.7.0, it is new why not start up to date?
  Not a blocker though, but nice if fixed up on the next upload
 
- VCS- entries ought to be pointing at the package maintenance
  So instead of
  https://github.com/intel/vision-drivers.git 
  It should point at
  
https://code.launchpad.net/~vicamo/ubuntu/+source/vision-drivers/+git/vision-drivers
  And furthermore, could it there be under a team and not a personal space?

This isn't a deep check, but it had no red flags on a quick pass
=> OK

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078327

Title:
  [needs-packaging] vision-drivers

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2078327/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067093] Re: astroquery: please RM from oracular

I see https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/astroquery/0.4.7+dfsg-1
Which migrated just fine.

None of the astro* left in excuses.

\o/

Thank you so much @Ole!

** Changed in: astropy (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067093

Title:
  astroquery: please RM from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/astropy/+bug/2067093/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2072619] Re: [MIR] python-jsonschema-specifications

2024-09-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 

This one is also ready for promotion, while unblocking component
mismatches for James I also looked at this one.

While the "no need for security nor test" is a bold call, you gladly outlined 
the reasons why you think so.
And it is not "no test" just no autopkgtest (the tests run at build at least) 
and given the purpose and content of the package I think that is OK. [All the 
code it has fits on one page].

Override component to main
python-jsonschema-specifications 2023.12.1-1ubuntu1 in oracular: universe/misc 
-> main
python3-jsonschema-specifications 2023.12.1-1ubuntu1 in oracular amd64: 
universe/python/optional/100% -> main
python3-jsonschema-specifications 2023.12.1-1ubuntu1 in oracular arm64: 
universe/python/optional/100% -> main
python3-jsonschema-specifications 2023.12.1-1ubuntu1 in oracular armhf: 
universe/python/optional/100% -> main
python3-jsonschema-specifications 2023.12.1-1ubuntu1 in oracular i386: 
universe/python/optional/100% -> main
python3-jsonschema-specifications 2023.12.1-1ubuntu1 in oracular ppc64el: 
universe/python/optional/100% -> main
python3-jsonschema-specifications 2023.12.1-1ubuntu1 in oracular riscv64: 
universe/python/optional/100% -> main
python3-jsonschema-specifications 2023.12.1-1ubuntu1 in oracular s390x: 
universe/python/optional/100% -> main
Override [y|N]? y
8 publications overridden.

** Changed in: python-jsonschema-specifications (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072619

Title:
  [MIR] python-jsonschema-specifications

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-jsonschema-specifications/+bug/2072619/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2072620] Re: [MIR] referencing

2024-09-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 

This one is also ready for promotion, while unblocking component
mismatches for James I also looked at this one.

Override component to main
referencing 0.35.1-1ubuntu1 in oracular: universe/misc -> main
python3-referencing 0.35.1-1ubuntu1 in oracular amd64: 
universe/python/optional/100% -> main
python3-referencing 0.35.1-1ubuntu1 in oracular arm64: 
universe/python/optional/100% -> main
python3-referencing 0.35.1-1ubuntu1 in oracular armhf: 
universe/python/optional/100% -> main
python3-referencing 0.35.1-1ubuntu1 in oracular i386: 
universe/python/optional/100% -> main
python3-referencing 0.35.1-1ubuntu1 in oracular ppc64el: 
universe/python/optional/100% -> main
python3-referencing 0.35.1-1ubuntu1 in oracular riscv64: 
universe/python/optional/100% -> main
python3-referencing 0.35.1-1ubuntu1 in oracular s390x: 
universe/python/optional/100% -> main
Override [y|N]? y
8 publications overridden.


** Changed in: referencing (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072620

Title:
  [MIR] referencing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/referencing/+bug/2072620/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068033] Re: [MIR] python-typeguard

2024-09-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt 

Override component to main
python-typeguard 4.3.0-1 in oracular: universe/misc -> main
python3-typeguard 4.3.0-1 in oracular amd64: universe/python/optional/100% -> 
main
python3-typeguard 4.3.0-1 in oracular arm64: universe/python/optional/100% -> 
main
python3-typeguard 4.3.0-1 in oracular armhf: universe/python/optional/100% -> 
main
python3-typeguard 4.3.0-1 in oracular i386: universe/python/optional/100% -> 
main
python3-typeguard 4.3.0-1 in oracular ppc64el: universe/python/optional/100% -> 
main
python3-typeguard 4.3.0-1 in oracular riscv64: universe/python/optional/100% -> 
main
python3-typeguard 4.3.0-1 in oracular s390x: universe/python/optional/100% -> 
main
Override [y|N]? y
8 publications overridden.

** Changed in: python-typeguard (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068033

Title:
  [MIR] python-typeguard

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-typeguard/+bug/2068033/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2043084] Re: GRUB menu loading failure via HTTP Boot on BlueField

FYI Removed from Jammy-proposed to unblock bug 2076929.
This isn't permanent - it can re-enter jammy-proposed when being re-uploaded in 
the future.

Removing packages from jammy-proposed:
grub2-unsigned 2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy
grub-efi-amd64 2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy amd64
grub-efi-amd64 2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy i386
grub-efi-amd64-bin 2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy amd64
grub-efi-amd64-bin 2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy i386
grub-efi-amd64-dbg 2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy amd64
grub-efi-amd64-dbg 2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy i386
grub-efi-arm64 2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy arm64
grub-efi-arm64-bin 2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy arm64
grub-efi-arm64-dbg 2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy arm64
grub2-signed 1.187.8 in jammy
grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.187.8+2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy amd64
grub-efi-arm64-signed 1.187.8+2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy arm64
Comment: Low urgency, but blocking urgent images rebuild against shim 15.8 (LP: 
#2076929, #2043084)
Remove [y|N]? y
2 packages successfully removed.


** Changed in: grub2-unsigned (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: Fix Committed => In Progress

** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu Jammy)
   Status: Fix Committed => In Progress

** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043084

Title:
  GRUB menu loading failure via HTTP Boot on BlueField

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/+bug/2043084/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2076929] Re: [SRU] Rebuild cd-boot-images-{amd64, arm64} against new shim

As outlined in the discussion above, I removed grub2-unsigned
grub2-signed from jammy-proposed to unblock you.

Removing packages from jammy-proposed:
grub2-unsigned 2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy
grub-efi-amd64 2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy amd64
grub-efi-amd64 2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy i386
grub-efi-amd64-bin 2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy amd64
grub-efi-amd64-bin 2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy i386
grub-efi-amd64-dbg 2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy amd64
grub-efi-amd64-dbg 2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy i386
grub-efi-arm64 2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy arm64
grub-efi-arm64-bin 2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy arm64
grub-efi-arm64-dbg 2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy arm64
grub2-signed 1.187.8 in jammy
grub-efi-amd64-signed 1.187.8+2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy amd64
grub-efi-arm64-signed 1.187.8+2.06-2ubuntu14.5 in jammy arm64
Comment: Low urgency, but blocking urgent images rebuild against shim 15.8 (LP: 
#2076929, #2043084)
Remove [y|N]? y
2 packages successfully removed.

Please bring back the content of bug 2043084 once it is ready.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076929

Title:
  [SRU] Rebuild cd-boot-images-{amd64,arm64} against new shim

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-amd64/+bug/2076929/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2076929] Re: [SRU] Rebuild cd-boot-images-{amd64, arm64} against new shim

Thanks for the clarifying MM/IRC discussions Mate!
The case is indeed clear once one cleared the view of all the different grub* 
things that play into this and are much more clear to you than to anyone just 
coming by :-).

To summarize my understanding:

- bug 2043084 brought us
  - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-unsigned/2.06-2ubuntu14.5
  - https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2-signed/1.187.8
  - into jammy-proposed
  - Fully verifying these takes a while
  - It is non-crticial and can wait

- Now we need to quickly rebuild images against shim 15.8
  - The binaries mentioned above in -proposed block that
  - Mate drives both activities
  - He is ok to reset his bug 2043084 to unblock this more urgent one

- After this is done, bug 2043084 can re-enter proposed.
  - Mate will upload again for doing so when the time is right

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076929

Title:
  [SRU] Rebuild cd-boot-images-{amd64,arm64} against new shim

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cd-boot-images-amd64/+bug/2076929/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073677] Re: Remove dmraid from oracular?

Thank you for confirming, I merged the MR of Lucas.
And then removed it:

Removing packages from oracular:
dmraid 1.0.0.rc16-12ubuntu4 in oracular
dmraid 1.0.0.rc16-12ubuntu4 in oracular amd64
dmraid 1.0.0.rc16-12ubuntu4 in oracular arm64
dmraid 1.0.0.rc16-12ubuntu4 in oracular armhf
dmraid 1.0.0.rc16-12ubuntu4 in oracular ppc64el
dmraid 1.0.0.rc16-12ubuntu4 in oracular riscv64
dmraid 1.0.0.rc16-12ubuntu4 in oracular s390x
libdmraid-dev 1.0.0.rc16-12ubuntu4 in oracular amd64
libdmraid-dev 1.0.0.rc16-12ubuntu4 in oracular arm64
libdmraid-dev 1.0.0.rc16-12ubuntu4 in oracular armhf
libdmraid-dev 1.0.0.rc16-12ubuntu4 in oracular ppc64el
libdmraid-dev 1.0.0.rc16-12ubuntu4 in oracular riscv64
libdmraid-dev 1.0.0.rc16-12ubuntu4 in oracular s390x
libdmraid1.0.0.rc16 1.0.0.rc16-12ubuntu4 in oracular amd64
libdmraid1.0.0.rc16 1.0.0.rc16-12ubuntu4 in oracular arm64
libdmraid1.0.0.rc16 1.0.0.rc16-12ubuntu4 in oracular armhf
libdmraid1.0.0.rc16 1.0.0.rc16-12ubuntu4 in oracular ppc64el
libdmraid1.0.0.rc16 1.0.0.rc16-12ubuntu4 in oracular riscv64
libdmraid1.0.0.rc16 1.0.0.rc16-12ubuntu4 in oracular s390x
Comment: Obsolete; dead upstream (LP: #2073677)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => In Progress

** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073677

Title:
  Remove dmraid from oracular?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2073677/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078313] Re: Remove badger on ppc64el from oracular

** Changed in: badger (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078313

Title:
  Remove badger on ppc64el from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/badger/+bug/2078313/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078313] Re: Remove badger on ppc64el from oracular

Removing packages from oracular:
badger 2.2007.2-3build1 in oracular ppc64el
Comment: FTBFS on ppc64el blocking golang grpc transition (LP: #2078313)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078313

Title:
  Remove badger on ppc64el from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/badger/+bug/2078313/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078313] Re: Remove badger on ppc64el from oracular

@zhjs

A few questions to further complete my understanding of potential ripple
effects in the go model, these thoughts are no priority, just for my
curiosity.

While the -dev is arch:all would, due to the problem any ppc64el build
depending on golang-github-dgraph-io-badger-dev also fail if we'd run it
right now? Or is this only affecting src:badger itself?

I understand that will depend on the kind of issue, this one here is a
test fail. While the first question usually then is if only the test is
broken or if something is really bad on ppc64 it might still "infect"
anything that build-depends on it. Do dependent builds in the go
ecosystem run the tests of what they B-D on?

And outside of this problem but more in general. To what extend does
usually anything that has a B-D on a go package also go FTBFS if the
package depended on goes FTBFS (which could be the counterpart of
dynamic linked ecosystems having to remove dependencies)?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078313

Title:
  Remove badger on ppc64el from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/badger/+bug/2078313/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078313] Re: Remove badger on ppc64el from oracular

Thank you zhjs for the discussion on IRC btw!
This is a positive aspect of golang builds that I did not yet formerly connect 
the dots about.
Thanks for you patience with my silly questions there, this morning I have a 
few more minutes for this and it makes sense now :-)

Due to the actual builds being static and thereby not having dependencies 
indeed the removal fallout is lower. Removing badger from ppc64el as requested 
indeed has itself no dependencies.
And what is left is only the code for building in 
golang-github-dgraph-io-badger-dev and that is arch:all indeed.

So while it is unfortunate that this is and stays FTBFS, it is - as you
reported - known upstream, not trivial to fix, will need an upload to
fix and currently blocks other things from migrating. Hence I agree that
the bin:badger on ppc64el shall be removed to unblock this situation.

** Changed in: badger (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078313

Title:
  Remove badger on ppc64el from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/badger/+bug/2078313/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060769] Re: pro-client decodes utf-8 strictly, which causes problems in some locales

Thank you all - This was extensively verified by now, making it verified
Also see comment #34

** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic 
verification-needed-focal verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-noble 
verification-needed-xenial
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic 
verification-done-focal verification-done-jammy verification-done-noble 
verification-done-xenial

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060769

Title:
  pro-client decodes utf-8 strictly, which causes problems in some
  locales

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/+bug/2060769/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078313] Re: Remove badger on ppc64el from oracular

Hi,
I didn't have much time atm, but will look at it again.
Until then please cahse down that you asked for just badger (which has no 
reverse dependencies), but there are other binaries of that source which are 
depended on:

root@o-prop:~# reverse-depends -r oracular -b src:badger
Reverse-Build-Depends
=
* garagemq  (for golang-github-dgraph-io-badger-dev)
* golang-github-smallstep-nosql

root@o-prop:~# reverse-depends -r oracular src:badger
Reverse-Depends
===
* golang-github-smallstep-nosql-dev


Please advise how you think the impact to these (I did not have a look what 
that implies) will be mitigated.

** Changed in: badger (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078313

Title:
  Remove badger on ppc64el from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/badger/+bug/2078313/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067093] Re: astroquery: please RM from oracular

Nothing in proposed

rmadison -u ubuntu -s oracular,oracular-proposed astroquery
 astroquery | 0.4.6+dfsg-4 | oracular/universe | source

Yet the main reason to for this to be a removal is that it also blocks astropy.
But that migrated or was cancelled

rmadison -u ubuntu -s oracular,oracular-proposed astropy
 astropy | 6.1.2-1 | oracular/universe | source

python3.12 compat in astroquery was fixed a while ago
- https://github.com/astropy/astroquery/pull/2838
And released
- https://github.com/astropy/astroquery/releases/tag/v0.4.7

And it seems the work on that goes on:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058104

Expecting it to drop needing python3-astropy-helpers and a removal of
that once ready.

I hope I understood the case correctly.
By no more blocking others, but being FTBFS (yet with a fix known) I think a 
removal is too much, but demotion to -proposed seems justifiable.

But even that might be too much since the fix is known for the only
problem being e.g. serving the package later and then an FTBFS is fatal.
But since there exists a solution (although not yet packaged) it seems
it can stay.


TBH, I'm torn on the decision of "do nothing" or "demote to proposed".
I'd say no to a removal right now.

To not clean overzealous I'll mark it Won't Fix and I'm happy to be
contacted and convincecd otherwise


** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1058104
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058104

** Changed in: astroquery (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067093

Title:
  astroquery: please RM from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/astropy/+bug/2067093/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2067093] Re: astroquery: please RM from oracular

Ack on FTBFS [1] and being removed from Testing.

Since there is no way it can resolve without a new upload and at the
same time blocks other things from migrating I think removing is better
than pushing it back to -proposed.

Dependencies indeed are "only" recommends which do not block the removal
and in this case seem not right to e.g. modify the depending packages.
Instead the problem of astroquery/astropy_helpers not being python 3.12
compatible needs to be fixed and that is known and tracked in Debian
already.

[1]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1057543
[2]: https://tracker.debian.org/news/1496364/astroquery-removed-from-testing/

** Changed in: astroquery (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067093

Title:
  astroquery: please RM from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/astropy/+bug/2067093/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2065662] Re: Please remove armfh binaries for libosmo-sccp from oracular

I think someone acted and resolved this without updating the bug:

Nothing in excuses about osmo and oracular seems to have no armhf of it
anymore.

$ rmadison -u ubuntu -s oracular,oracular-proposed libosmo-sccp 
libosmo-sccp-dev libosmo-sigtran7 libosmo-sigtran-doc libosmo-sigtran-dev 
libosmosccp0 libosmomtp0 libosmoxua0 osmo-stp libosmo-netif libosmonetif8 
libosmo-netif-dev
 libosmo-sccp| 1.6.0+dfsg1-5build1 | oracular/universe | source
 libosmo-sccp-dev| 1.6.0+dfsg1-5build1 | oracular/universe | amd64, arm64, 
ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
 libosmo-sigtran7| 1.6.0+dfsg1-5build1 | oracular/universe | amd64, arm64, 
ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
 libosmo-sigtran-doc | 1.6.0+dfsg1-5build1 | oracular/universe | all
 libosmo-sigtran-dev | 1.6.0+dfsg1-5build1 | oracular/universe | amd64, arm64, 
ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
 libosmosccp0| 1.6.0+dfsg1-5build1 | oracular/universe | amd64, arm64, 
ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
 libosmomtp0 | 1.6.0+dfsg1-5build1 | oracular/universe | amd64, arm64, 
ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
 libosmoxua0 | 1.6.0+dfsg1-5build1 | oracular/universe | amd64, arm64, 
ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
 osmo-stp| 1.6.0+dfsg1-5build1 | oracular/universe | amd64, arm64, 
ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
 libosmo-netif   | 1.2.0-3 | oracular/universe | source
 libosmonetif8   | 1.2.0-3 | oracular/universe | amd64, arm64, 
ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
 libosmo-netif-dev   | 1.2.0-3 | oracular/universe | amd64, arm64, 
ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

** Changed in: libosmo-sccp (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

** Changed in: libosmo-netif (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065662

Title:
  Please remove armfh binaries for libosmo-sccp from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libosmo-netif/+bug/2065662/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2068612] Re: Please remove wireless-tools from oracular

Hey Ravi,
thanks for driving this!

We see progress on the meta packages \o/.
Furthermore I was able to process many but not all of the related removals.

Therefore it might be time to re-check, summarize and double down on the
few tasks that are left to make it in time for beta freeze?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068612

Title:
  Please remove wireless-tools from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kubuntu-meta/+bug/2068612/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2069154] Re: Please remove matchobox-panel from oracular

For full transparency, this is not only abandoned - it also is part of
the removal of the very outdated wireless-tools via bug 2068612

This certainly is not a very often used component, but removing it would
essentially remove all of the matchbox ecosystem which might be a bit
too much or is that what you ask for?

Since the "matchbox" meta package depends on matchbox-panel and there is
no packages matchbox-panel2 it would mean that had to go away. We can't
just "remove and hope for the rest to stay usable", hence I propose that
we need to clarify the approach here.

Options that come to mind in increasing order of being nice:

a) Remove all matchbox* packages

b) Remove matchbox, matchbox-panel and consider it bad luck for the very
few users, but they can still use the other packages directly

c) adapt matchbox to not depend on matchbox-panel, then remove matchbox-
panel

d) package matchbox-panel2, adapt matchbox to depend on that, then
remove matchbox-panel

All options b upwards, need a testing effort if there is anything left
working without it - otherwise all matchbox* needs to be removed. OTOH
maybe that testing reveals it is old and dysfunctional anyway, which
then makes us go for (a).

I'd ask you to pick the approach (or add a new variant) you wanted to go
and provide the related packaging/testing as needed.

** Changed in: matchbox-panel (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069154

Title:
  Please remove matchobox-panel from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/matchbox-panel/+bug/2069154/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2069064] Re: Please remove haskell-iwlib from oracular

Removing packages from oracular:
haskell-iwlib 0.1.2-2build4 in oracular
libghc-iwlib-dev 0.1.2-2build4 in oracular amd64
libghc-iwlib-dev 0.1.2-2build4 in oracular arm64
libghc-iwlib-dev 0.1.2-2build4 in oracular armhf
libghc-iwlib-dev 0.1.2-2build4 in oracular ppc64el
libghc-iwlib-dev 0.1.2-2build4 in oracular riscv64
libghc-iwlib-dev 0.1.2-2build4 in oracular s390x
libghc-iwlib-doc 0.1.2-2build4 in oracular amd64
libghc-iwlib-doc 0.1.2-2build4 in oracular arm64
libghc-iwlib-doc 0.1.2-2build4 in oracular armhf
libghc-iwlib-doc 0.1.2-2build4 in oracular i386
libghc-iwlib-doc 0.1.2-2build4 in oracular ppc64el
libghc-iwlib-doc 0.1.2-2build4 in oracular riscv64
libghc-iwlib-doc 0.1.2-2build4 in oracular s390x
libghc-iwlib-prof 0.1.2-2build4 in oracular amd64
libghc-iwlib-prof 0.1.2-2build4 in oracular arm64
libghc-iwlib-prof 0.1.2-2build4 in oracular armhf
libghc-iwlib-prof 0.1.2-2build4 in oracular ppc64el
libghc-iwlib-prof 0.1.2-2build4 in oracular riscv64
libghc-iwlib-prof 0.1.2-2build4 in oracular s390x
Comment: Unused library wrapping deprecated and to be removed iwlib (LP: 
#2069064)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.

** Changed in: haskell-iwlib (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069064

Title:
  Please remove haskell-iwlib from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-iwlib/+bug/2069064/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2069064] Re: Please remove haskell-iwlib from oracular

The more of these iwlib cases I do the less I can write as I feel all has been 
said.
It might be worth to link to the overall bug [1] for awareness though as from 
there one can find the various cases and discussions around this.

For the case here, yes this is a library (wrapper) with no reverse dependencies.
So nothing in the archive will be impacted removing it.

Maybe 3rd party software, but they should just as much switch to the new
interfaces and have Noble until 2036 if super-needed.

Ack on the removal

[1]: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wireless-
tools/+bug/2068612

** Changed in: haskell-iwlib (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069064

Title:
  Please remove haskell-iwlib from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haskell-iwlib/+bug/2069064/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073677] Re: Remove dmraid from oracular?

Merging other discussion on the same topic, and marked 2048766 as a dup to this.
The three steps we need to do now are are:

1. cross check with the subiquity folks that this is *actually* obsolete
   Ref: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/2048766/comments/4 has no 
answer yet
   I'll add and assign a task here to Dan to make sure we have that

2. Once #2 is confirmed, merge Lucas MR to remove it
   https://code.launchpad.net/~slyon/ubuntu-seeds/+git/platform/+merge/458238

3. Do the actual removal from Oracular

** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Triaged

** Also affects: subiquity
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: subiquity
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Dan Bungert (dbungert)

** Merge proposal linked:
   https://code.launchpad.net/~slyon/ubuntu-seeds/+git/platform/+merge/458238

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073677

Title:
  Remove dmraid from oracular?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2073677/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2048766] Re: Please remove dmraid from the Ubuntu archive

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2073677 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073677

Discussed in too many placed at once :-)
Marking this one as a dup to bug 2073677

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2073677
   Remove dmraid from oracular?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2048766

Title:
  Please remove dmraid from the Ubuntu archive

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/2048766/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073677] Re: Remove dmraid from oracular?

@Steve - Thank you for chiming in.
You have all the Hat's (Foundation, release, ...) that I formerly missed to be 
sure.
Thanks for also already adding the ubuntu-release-upgrade task btw, let me mark 
that one as critical to not be missed too easily.

@Mitchell
Thank you for working on the referred issue btw.
As I outlined in more detail in MM I'd ask you to write a release notes entry 
for that if you are ok to do so.


I think we have thereby enough votes then to act on it.
And as I mentioned before, doing so now allows it to be well in time for the 
beta freeze and images giving it one more chance to create signal if we miss a 
risk in this.

** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => In Progress

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Critical

** Also affects: ubuntu-release-notes
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: ubuntu-release-notes
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073677

Title:
  Remove dmraid from oracular?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/2073677/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2072484] Re: iscsiuio ships iscsiuio.service but not iscsiuio.socket

I had the chance to try a system which has the socket and it was working
fine.

It also is present in the rpm world, which implies that we'd not become
the odd one adding it as the only distro.

○ iscsiuio.service - iSCSI UserSpace I/O driver
 Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/iscsiuio.service; disabled; 
preset: disabled)
Drop-In: /usr/lib/systemd/system/service.d
 └─10-timeout-abort.conf
 /run/systemd/system/service.d
 └─zzz-lxc-service.conf
 Active: inactive (dead)
TriggeredBy: ● iscsiuio.socket
   Docs: man:iscsiuio(8)

● iscsiuio.socket - Open-iSCSI iscsiuio Socket
 Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/iscsiuio.socket; enabled; preset: 
enabled)
 Active: active (listening) since Wed 2024-08-28 15:26:11 UTC; 8s ago
   Triggers: ● iscsiuio.service
   Docs: man:iscsiuio(8)
 Listen: @ISCSID_UIP_ABSTRACT_NAMESPACE (Stream)
 CGroup: /system.slice/iscsiuio.socket


What is left is finding the time to
1. add it to the PKG
2. try if then the default state at boot is as it should (or if it needs some 
dh_install... changes in d/rules)
3. find which use case gets to uip_connect in usr/iscsid_req.c as that is what 
will connect to the socket to see if the thing spawns

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072484

Title:
  iscsiuio ships iscsiuio.service but not iscsiuio.socket

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-iscsi/+bug/2072484/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2069140] Re: RM: minetest [ppc64el riscv64]: no longer builds on archs

I fail to write something elaborate or fancy- yes you are right and that is it 
:-)
We need to follow the linked Debian bug and do the same removal to let it 
migrate.

Removing packages from oracular:
minetest 5.6.1+dfsg+~1.9.0mt8+dfsg-4build3 in oracular ppc64el
minetest 5.6.1+dfsg+~1.9.0mt8+dfsg-4build3 in oracular riscv64
minetest-server 5.6.1+dfsg+~1.9.0mt8+dfsg-4build3 in oracular ppc64el
minetest-server 5.6.1+dfsg+~1.9.0mt8+dfsg-4build3 in oracular riscv64
Comment: No longer builds on arches ppc64el and riscv64 due to switch to 
lua-jit (LP: #2069140)
Remove [y|N]? y
4 packages successfully removed.


** Changed in: minetest (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069140

Title:
  RM: minetest [ppc64el riscv64]: no longer builds on archs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/minetest/+bug/2069140/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2069500] Re: pyfftw: Please RM from Oracular

The removal was done, the problem is mitigated.
But this still shows up in the AA task list due to the open scipy task that was 
back then meant to show it on update excuses. Removing it now to clear the view.

** No longer affects: scipy (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069500

Title:
  pyfftw: Please RM from Oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pyfftw/+bug/2069500/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1758702] Re: Please consider adding gitlab to sync blacklist

sync-blocklist (devel) grep -Hrn gitaly 
extra-removals.txt:21:gitalygitlab
sync-blocklist.txt:710:gitaly

So it should be already blocked, TBH I do not know what has synced it
back in.

FTR related removal of bdep [2]

And while it is only "back in -proposed" and there blocked on missing BDs [1] 
it is still bad.
We often say we can keep things there until they work, but we do not want this 
one to migrate.
Therefore in this case the risk of it migrating and then causing all that was 
outlined above is a risk we'd want to avoid. So keeping it in -proposed without 
a good reason to do so seems not right here.

I agree that for the same reasons as before it should be removed from
Oracular before we release.


Removing packages from oracular-proposed:
gitaly 16.0.8+ds1-1build1 in oracular
Comment: gitlab is not supported in Ubuntu (LP: #1758702)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.
[1]: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gitaly/16.0.8+ds1-1build1
[2]: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-github-libgit2-git2go/+bug/2046034

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1758702

Title:
  Please consider adding gitlab to sync blacklist

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gitaly/+bug/1758702/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2069200] Re: RM: gitaly from Oracular; mistakenly sync'ed from Debian

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1758702 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1758702

This was also reported on 1758702 earlier this year.
Making it a dup.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1758702
   Please consider adding gitlab to sync blacklist

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069200

Title:
  RM: gitaly from Oracular; mistakenly sync'ed from Debian

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gitaly/+bug/2069200/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2070378] Re: Please remove libwlocate from oracular

Removing packages from oracular:
libwlocate 0.0git20130108-0ubuntu4 in oracular
libwlocate-dev 0.0git20130108-0ubuntu4 in oracular amd64
libwlocate-dev 0.0git20130108-0ubuntu4 in oracular arm64
libwlocate-dev 0.0git20130108-0ubuntu4 in oracular armhf
libwlocate-dev 0.0git20130108-0ubuntu4 in oracular ppc64el
libwlocate-dev 0.0git20130108-0ubuntu4 in oracular riscv64
libwlocate-dev 0.0git20130108-0ubuntu4 in oracular s390x
libwlocate0 0.0git20130108-0ubuntu4 in oracular amd64
libwlocate0 0.0git20130108-0ubuntu4 in oracular arm64
libwlocate0 0.0git20130108-0ubuntu4 in oracular armhf
libwlocate0 0.0git20130108-0ubuntu4 in oracular ppc64el
libwlocate0 0.0git20130108-0ubuntu4 in oracular riscv64
libwlocate0 0.0git20130108-0ubuntu4 in oracular s390x
Comment: Using deprecated libiw-dev interface and a no more available public 
database (LP: #2070378)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.

** Changed in: libwlocate (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070378

Title:
  Please remove libwlocate from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libwlocate/+bug/2070378/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2070378] Re: Please remove libwlocate from oracular

Ack to all you reported.

The third libiw-dev bug, so the same reasoning as in bug 2072667 and bug
2070374 applies here as well.

Furthermore it is library only (it has no executables) without any
reverse dependencies itself is useless as it is not providing much (I
didn't find any external users on the internet).

Furthermore as you said openwlanmap.org does not exist anymore.
There are other similar services but none look directly related [1]. 

So yes, this is not helpful to be kept around.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wi-Fi_positioning_system

** Changed in: libwlocate (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070378

Title:
  Please remove libwlocate from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libwlocate/+bug/2070378/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2070374] Re: Please remove guessnet from oracular

Removing packages from oracular:
guessnet 0.58build2 in oracular
guessnet 0.58build2 in oracular amd64
guessnet 0.58build2 in oracular arm64
guessnet 0.58build2 in oracular armhf
guessnet 0.58build2 in oracular ppc64el
guessnet 0.58build2 in oracular riscv64
guessnet 0.58build2 in oracular s390x
Comment: Using deprecated libiw-dev interface (LP: #2070374)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.

** Changed in: guessnet (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070374

Title:
  Please remove guessnet from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/guessnet/+bug/2070374/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2070374] Re: Please remove guessnet from oracular

Extra ref - the libwibble issue https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070014

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070374

Title:
  Please remove guessnet from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/guessnet/+bug/2070374/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2070374] Re: Please remove guessnet from oracular

The second libiw-dev bug, so the same reasoning as in bug 2072667 applies here 
as well.
As in even what is working, barely supports any devices as the interface moved 
on.

Furthermore it has no integration into any modern networking like
systemd-networkd/NM, only to ifupdown.

Additionally it was removed from testing [1] as part of libwibble.
Which means it will come back with actual updates (hopefully addressing more) 
or more likely as it seems stay dormant and bit rot further. [2] Indicates it 
had plenty of issues that never have been addressed.

And while I consider it unlikely to happen, as you said it can be added
back when (if) they switch to a new dependency.

Ack to the request

[1]: https://tracker.debian.org/news/1540563/guessnet-removed-from-testing/
[2]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=no&src=guessnet

** Changed in: guessnet (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1070014
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1070014

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070374

Title:
  Please remove guessnet from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/guessnet/+bug/2070374/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2072667] Re: Please remove wmwave from oracular

Hi Ravi,
I agree to the case.

The reasons why you might not see much through in wmwave through iw-dev is 
explained in the page you linked.
"while cfg80211 still has some backward compatibility support, and a few 
ancient drivers still support only wireless extensions, everything else has 
long moved on and doesn't support anything but the most basic features with 
wireless extensions."

You said "There are various projects now to display statistical information 
about a current wireless ethernet connection" and while that is true, wavemon 
comes to mind. None of them is dockapp style widget.
But even that is indirectly available e.g. as gkrellmwireless which is way more 
common and poviding a similar use case.

So yes, unmaintained, using a deprecated interface and alternatives
available.

** Changed in: wmwave (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072667

Title:
  Please remove wmwave from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wmwave/+bug/2072667/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2072667] Re: Please remove wmwave from oracular

Removing packages from oracular:
wmwave 0.4-11.1build2 in oracular
wmwave 0.4-11.1build2 in oracular amd64
wmwave 0.4-11.1build2 in oracular arm64
wmwave 0.4-11.1build2 in oracular armhf
wmwave 0.4-11.1build2 in oracular ppc64el
wmwave 0.4-11.1build2 in oracular riscv64
wmwave 0.4-11.1build2 in oracular s390x
Comment: Unmaintained, using a deprecated interface and alternatives available 
(LP: #2072667)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.

** Changed in: wmwave (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072667

Title:
  Please remove wmwave from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wmwave/+bug/2072667/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2070374] Re: Please remove guessnet from oracular

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1058732
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058732

** Also affects: guessnet (Debian) via
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1058732
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070374

Title:
  Please remove guessnet from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/guessnet/+bug/2070374/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2072723] Re: please remove jupyter-ydoc due to dependency-wait on ypy

Hi Vladimir,
as on another case I recently worked on, you are right with all you report.
But since it is:
- only in -proposed and thereby not affecting the oracular release
- might be resolved without a new upload once the bdep exists
- is not blocking something else
=> we can just leave it as-is.

The only negative thing it does to us is to stay around in excuses until
it would be resolved or removed. But unless I didn't get the memo on a
change, that is not enough to remove a package.

Therefore sorry - while you outlined an absolutely correct case, I'll
set it to Won't Fix.

** Changed in: jupyter-ydoc (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072723

Title:
  please remove jupyter-ydoc due to dependency-wait on ypy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jupyter-ydoc/+bug/2072723/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2072898] Re: please remove tools-nrepl-clojure from oracular

Today no rev-deps are left due to your efforts:

$ reverse-depends src:tools-nrepl-clojure
No reverse dependencies found
$ reverse-depends --build-depends src:tools-nrepl-clojure
No reverse dependencies found

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072898

Title:
  please remove tools-nrepl-clojure from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/prismatic-schema-clojure/+bug/2072898/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2072898] Re: please remove tools-nrepl-clojure from oracular

Removing packages from oracular:
tools-nrepl-clojure 0.2.13-2 in oracular
libtools-nrepl-clojure 0.2.13-2 in oracular amd64
libtools-nrepl-clojure 0.2.13-2 in oracular arm64
libtools-nrepl-clojure 0.2.13-2 in oracular armhf
libtools-nrepl-clojure 0.2.13-2 in oracular i386
libtools-nrepl-clojure 0.2.13-2 in oracular ppc64el
libtools-nrepl-clojure 0.2.13-2 in oracular riscv64
libtools-nrepl-clojure 0.2.13-2 in oracular s390x
Comment: FTBFS and Replaced by nrepl-closure (LP: #2072898)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.

** Changed in: tools-nrepl-clojure (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072898

Title:
  please remove tools-nrepl-clojure from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/prismatic-schema-clojure/+bug/2072898/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2072898] Re: please remove tools-nrepl-clojure from oracular

Thanks for resolving the unused dependencies in rbac-client-clojure and 
prismatic-schema-clojure.
Linking the MRs was extra helpful to quickly see what was done there.

This has a replacement in nrepl-closure, so removing it will not leave
an empty space behind.

It is currently failing as FTBFS as you explained and listed in excuses,
so removing it will clear the view there.

So yes, overall this looks like a completely valid case to get removed.

** Changed in: tools-nrepl-clojure (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Changed in: tools-nrepl-clojure (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072898

Title:
  please remove tools-nrepl-clojure from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/prismatic-schema-clojure/+bug/2072898/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2072724] Re: please remove: facet-analyser 0.0~git20221121142040.6be10b8+ds1-3 has conflicting build dependencies

Thank you Vladimir,
indeed the problem is not just ours and also already reported in Debian - 
thanks for the link.

It has been removed from Debian Testing [1] as part of paraview going
away.

But while you have my +1 on this being bad, it is only in -proposed so there is 
no reason to remove it.
Maybe it's missing build dependencies are resolved one day.
That is unlikely but possible to happen with an upload of facet-analyser itself.

Unless this is blocking something else it can stay in oracular-proposed,
will not affect the upcoming release, and will migrate if it ever
becomes buildable.

[1]: https://tracker.debian.org/news/1449984/facet-analyser-removed-
from-testing/

** Changed in: facet-analyser (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Won't Fix

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072724

Title:
  please remove: facet-analyser 0.0~git20221121142040.6be10b8+ds1-3 has
  conflicting build dependencies

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/facet-analyser/+bug/2072724/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073513] Re: RM {ec2-api-tools,screenbin} from Oracular

Removing packages from oracular:
ec2-api-tools 1.6.14.1-0ubuntu2 in oracular
ec2-api-tools 1.6.14.1-0ubuntu2 in oracular amd64
ec2-api-tools 1.6.14.1-0ubuntu2 in oracular arm64
ec2-api-tools 1.6.14.1-0ubuntu2 in oracular armhf
ec2-api-tools 1.6.14.1-0ubuntu2 in oracular i386
ec2-api-tools 1.6.14.1-0ubuntu2 in oracular ppc64el
ec2-api-tools 1.6.14.1-0ubuntu2 in oracular riscv64
ec2-api-tools 1.6.14.1-0ubuntu2 in oracular s390x
Comment: Deprecated, unmaintained and replaced by awscli (LP: #2073513)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.

** Changed in: ec2-api-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073513

Title:
  RM {ec2-api-tools,screenbin} from Oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-api-tools/+bug/2073513/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073513] Re: RM {ec2-api-tools,screenbin} from Oracular

FYI our ec2-api-tools is of 2014 and upstream continued until 2015 in
version 1.7.5.1 (which Ubuntu never picked up as the switch to awscli
already had happened).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073513

Title:
  RM {ec2-api-tools,screenbin} from Oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-api-tools/+bug/2073513/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073513] Re: RM {ec2-api-tools,screenbin} from Oracular

Removing packages from oracular:
screenbin 1.5-0ubuntu1 in oracular
screenbin 1.5-0ubuntu1 in oracular amd64
screenbin 1.5-0ubuntu1 in oracular arm64
screenbin 1.5-0ubuntu1 in oracular armhf
screenbin 1.5-0ubuntu1 in oracular i386
screenbin 1.5-0ubuntu1 in oracular ppc64el
screenbin 1.5-0ubuntu1 in oracular riscv64
screenbin 1.5-0ubuntu1 in oracular s390x
Comment: unmaintained and the depencency of ec2-api-tools is being removed (LP: 
#2073513)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.

** Changed in: screenbin (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073513

Title:
  RM {ec2-api-tools,screenbin} from Oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-api-tools/+bug/2073513/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073513] Re: RM {ec2-api-tools,screenbin} from Oracular

Hi,
indeed awscli is the currently maintained way to interact.

screenbin has not been updated ever since Precise and that does not speak for 
it.
Same for ec2-api-tools that also are on the same version for ages
Most of it is stuck since 2010

But even 1.5 decades later might trick people to use that over the more
modern right way.

I checked the ecosystem a bit more, but found no indicator this should stay.
And the use-case of screenbin was a nice "I do it for you in one go", but is 
also possible with just a few commands, so I doubt it will be missed a lot.

I agree it should be removed.

** Changed in: screenbin (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: ec2-api-tools (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073513

Title:
  RM {ec2-api-tools,screenbin} from Oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ec2-api-tools/+bug/2073513/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073677] Re: Remove from oracular?

Dependency wise there is nothing that strictly forbids the removal.

$ reverse-depends --build-depends src:dmraid
Reverse-Testsuite-Triggers
==
* dracut(for dmraid)


And a recommends from ubiquity.

$ reverse-depends src:dmraid
Reverse-Recommends
==
* ubiquity  (for dmraid)

Furthermore it is a Foundations package, so I'd like to make sure we
hear their opinion before acting.

** Summary changed:

- Remove from oracular?
+ Remove dmraid from oracular?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073677

Title:
  Remove dmraid from oracular?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/2073677/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2073677] Re: Remove from oracular?

While I agree with Mitchell that some still users use it, it might be
time to force reconsidering to something that is well maintained. If
upstream is dead but we are continuing we help to set users up for
failure in the long run.

Furthermore now being removed in Debian will put even more burden on
just Ubuntu and I'd not know someone easily able to say "yeah I can
spend all the time needed for this".

And gladly in this case there are alternatives:
- mdadm based solutions can behave quite similar
- Raid via filesystem features like in zfs
- ... probably more I didn't check

And 24.10 is "only" the first -dev release towards 26.04. It is just the
right time to do such changes IMHO. I'd be in favor of removing it

The alternative is to keep it as-is for 24.10 but remove it very early
in 25.04 allowing us all the development time of 25.04 to detect if that
was a really bad idea.

But being well after Feature Freeze that will also need release team
approval - I'll reach out.

If we agree and remove it, we'd want to add something like [1] to the
Oracular (or if we do it in 25.04 there) release notes.

[1]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;bug=1021490;filename=dmraid.diff;msg=10

** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073677

Title:
  Remove dmraid from oracular?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dmraid/+bug/2073677/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077308] Re: python-anndata: Please RM from Oracular

This is done, and scipy only added to show in excuses, dropping it

** No longer affects: scipy (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077308

Title:
  python-anndata: Please RM from Oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-anndata/+bug/2077308/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078003] Re: Remove bind-dyndb-ldap from Oracular

Removing packages from oracular:
bind-dyndb-ldap 11.10-6ubuntu12 in oracular
bind9-dyndb-ldap 11.10-6ubuntu12 in oracular amd64
bind9-dyndb-ldap 11.10-6ubuntu12 in oracular arm64
bind9-dyndb-ldap 11.10-6ubuntu12 in oracular armhf
bind9-dyndb-ldap 11.10-6ubuntu12 in oracular ppc64el
bind9-dyndb-ldap 11.10-6ubuntu12 in oracular riscv64
bind9-dyndb-ldap 11.10-6ubuntu12 in oracular s390x
Comment: Incompatible with bind 9.20 (LP: #2078003)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.

** Changed in: bind-dyndb-ldap (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078003

Title:
  Remove bind-dyndb-ldap from Oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind-dyndb-ldap/+bug/2078003/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2078003] Re: Remove bind-dyndb-ldap from Oracular

Yeah, sad case of using internal structures now breaking.
I wish we could give this feature to the few users, but until upstream makes a 
move that isn't really feasible. I agree that - until a fix exists - it should 
be removed to not block others.

The normal strategy here is indeed to remove (but not block any future
sync to bring back working version).

We could as an alternative push it to proposed instead, but that is only
done if we'd have significant delta that we want to retain.

In this case we have a lot of delta (...ubuntu12).
But those are mostly:
- 8 no change rebuilds for new libs - yes it is unchanged for quite a while.
- 3 times compat fixes of when there were fixes available to work with newer 
bind
- 2 lost version when redoing an uploads

The no change and lost versions do not matter.
Proper compat changes are just what is needed for bind 9.20 for this to make 
sense - so the old ones can go away (they are still in old publishing and 
thereby git-ubuntu if ever needed).

Hence ack on the case and removal>demote-to-proposed.

** Changed in: bind-dyndb-ldap (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2078003

Title:
  Remove bind-dyndb-ldap from Oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bind-dyndb-ldap/+bug/2078003/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077773] Re: Remove from Oracular

Removing packages from oracular:
amazon-ec2-net-utils 2.4.1-2 in oracular
amazon-ec2-net-utils 2.4.1-2 in oracular amd64
amazon-ec2-net-utils 2.4.1-2 in oracular arm64
amazon-ec2-net-utils 2.4.1-2 in oracular armhf
amazon-ec2-net-utils 2.4.1-2 in oracular i386
amazon-ec2-net-utils 2.4.1-2 in oracular ppc64el
amazon-ec2-net-utils 2.4.1-2 in oracular riscv64
amazon-ec2-net-utils 2.4.1-2 in oracular s390x
Comment: Hotplugging is already enabled by default without user interaction 
(LP: #203)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: amazon-ec2-net-utils (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203

Title:
  Remove from Oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amazon-ec2-net-utils/+bug/203/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077773] Re: Remove from Oracular

Added https://git.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-archive/+git/sync-
blocklist/commit/?id=dd3e22179768fbafb379ca5f920ed0a6a0094a50

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203

Title:
  Remove from Oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amazon-ec2-net-utils/+bug/203/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077773] Re: Remove from Oracular

I can't provide much more fancy words, well explained, the case is clear and 
I'd remove it.
But, you need to take action first or it would come back.

This is a sync:
amazon-ec2-net-utils | 2.3.0-3   | stable | source, all
amazon-ec2-net-utils | 2.4.1-2   | testing| source, all
amazon-ec2-net-utils | 2.4.1-2   | unstable   | source, all

amazon-ec2-net-utils | 2.3.0-2~ubuntu0.22.04 | jammy-proposed/universe | 
source, all
amazon-ec2-net-utils | 2.4.1-1   | noble/universe  | 
source, all
amazon-ec2-net-utils | 2.4.1-2   | oracular/universe   | 
source, all

So even if removed now it would come back the moment someone uploads something 
newer than 2.4.1-2 to Debian. Hence let us prevent that from happening and then 
we can remove it.
Actually, the order of this does not matter - I can remove, but once the block 
lands you need to check if it came in again and needs to be re-removed.

** Changed in: amazon-ec2-net-utils (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203

Title:
  Remove from Oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/amazon-ec2-net-utils/+bug/203/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077263] Re: Please remove hkl on s390x

While before that was GSL depending on HKL which was blocked by that
this is resolved since Doko removed it on Saturday.

GSL is still on https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-
migration/update_excuses.html#gsl and there shows bug 2071468. It
actually is in "Will attempt migration" state so other than maybe some
installability issues it should be fine.

I'll therefore remove the GSL task to drop of the AA queue.

** No longer affects: gsl (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077263

Title:
  Please remove hkl on s390x

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hkl/+bug/2077263/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077099] Re: Please remove reform-setup-wizard on unsupported architectures

Removing packages from oracular:
reform-setup-wizard 1.0-9 in oracular armhf
reform-setup-wizard 1.0-9 in oracular ppc64el
reform-setup-wizard 1.0-9 in oracular riscv64
reform-setup-wizard 1.0-9 in oracular s390x
Comment: Not intended to build on armhf ppc64el riscv64 s390x (LP: #2077099)
Remove [y|N]? y
4 packages successfully removed.

** Changed in: reform-setup-wizard (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077099

Title:
  Please remove reform-setup-wizard on unsupported architectures

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/reform-setup-wizard/+bug/2077099/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077099] Re: Please remove reform-setup-wizard on unsupported architectures

I looked at the case and I agree, this is an intentional drop of those
other architectures and should be removed.

Furthermore no reverse dependencies needed to be considered AFAICS:

root@o-prop:~# reverse-depends --build-depends src:reform-setup-wizard
No reverse dependencies found
root@o-prop:~# reverse-depends src:reform-setup-wizard
No reverse dependencies found

And then since this is the "GTK-based first-boot setup wizard" it is
eventually left on the platforms most likely to actually drive a real
desktop on end user systems that need such a first boot setup.

If not you can be person quoted in the changelog (That entry made me
smile) "If you want to sink time in making this work on armel, s390x or
riscv, please contact me. Too many hours of my free-time went into
architectures on which nobody is going to use this package on already."

** Changed in: reform-setup-wizard (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077099

Title:
  Please remove reform-setup-wizard on unsupported architectures

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/reform-setup-wizard/+bug/2077099/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077305] Re: Remove golang-github-container-orchestrated-devices-container-device-interface from oracular

Removing packages from oracular:
golang-github-container-orchestrated-devices-container-device-interface 
0.8.0-2 in oracular
Comment: Built binary taken over by 
src:golang-tags.cncf-container-device-interface (LP: #2077305)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: 
golang-github-container-orchestrated-devices-container-device-interface (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077305

Title:
  Remove golang-github-container-orchestrated-devices-container-device-
  interface from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-github-container-orchestrated-devices-container-device-interface/+bug/2077305/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077305] Re: Remove golang-github-container-orchestrated-devices-container-device-interface from oracular

Checkd and confirmed.
It was built by [1] taken over by [2].

But [3] itself was no taken over, only the name was.
[4] Is a transitional pointing to the new [5]

Ack to the case.

[1]: 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-github-container-orchestrated-devices-container-device-interface/0.8.0-2
[2]: 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-tags.cncf-container-device-interface/0.8.0-4
[3]: 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oracular/+package/golang-github-container-orchestrated-devices-container-device-interface-dev
[4]: 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oracular/+package/golang-github-container-orchestrated-devices-container-device-interface-dev
[5]: 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/oracular/+package/golang-tags.cncf-container-device-interface-dev

** Changed in: 
golang-github-container-orchestrated-devices-container-device-interface (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077305

Title:
  Remove golang-github-container-orchestrated-devices-container-device-
  interface from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-github-container-orchestrated-devices-container-device-interface/+bug/2077305/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2076995] Re: Remove golang-1.1[23]-race-detector-runtime from oracular

Removing packages from oracular:
golang-1.12-race-detector-runtime 0.0+svn332029-0ubuntu1 in oracular
golang-1.12-race-detector-runtime 0.0+svn332029-0ubuntu1 in 
oracular amd64
golang-1.13-race-detector-runtime 0.0+svn332029-0ubuntu2 in oracular
golang-1.13-race-detector-runtime 0.0+svn332029-0ubuntu2 in 
oracular amd64
Comment: Relic from Focal, part of the base package now. No more used or needed 
(LP: #2076995)
Remove [y|N]? y
2 packages successfully removed.

** Changed in: golang-1.12-race-detector-runtime (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

** Changed in: golang-1.13-race-detector-runtime (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076995

Title:
  Remove golang-1.1[23]-race-detector-runtime from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-1.12-race-detector-runtime/+bug/2076995/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2076995] Re: Remove golang-1.12-race-detector-runtime from oracular

Hi, let me combine this and the same for 1.13 so we only write the same
once.

You are right 1.12/1.13 is rather old and not around for ages.

1.22/1.23 would be what we have.

That package was last part of
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-defaults/2:1.13~1ubuntu2 and
since then just stays around.

In groovy we didn't add back the Delta that was "Build and recommend 
golang-race-detector-runtime on amd64."
It was never mentioned in the changelog as it was a sync then.

The feature was part of the language all the time and this was to build it from 
source when it was not.
Removing that is not breaking the [1][2] feature.

One can on Oracular without these packages installed use the example of
[2] and race check it just fine.

root@o-prop:~# go run -race mysrc.go
==
WARNING: DATA RACE
Write at 0x00c7c0f0 by goroutine 7:
  runtime.mapassign_faststr()
  /usr/lib/go-1.23/src/runtime/map_faststr.go:223 +0x0
  main.main.func1()
  /root/mysrc.go:9 +0x4a

Previous write at 0x00c7c0f0 by main goroutine:
  runtime.mapassign_faststr()
  /usr/lib/go-1.23/src/runtime/map_faststr.go:223 +0x0
  main.main()
  /root/mysrc.go:12 +0x108

Goroutine 7 (running) created at:
  main.main()
  /root/mysrc.go:8 +0xeb
==
2 b
1 a
Found 1 data race(s)
exit status 66


TL;DR: yes it is a relic of the past and not needed/useful anymore, removing ...

[1]: https://go.dev/blog/race-detector
[2]: https://go.dev/doc/articles/race_detector

** Changed in: golang-1.13-race-detector-runtime (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: golang-1.12-race-detector-runtime (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Summary changed:

- Remove golang-1.12-race-detector-runtime from oracular
+ Remove golang-1.1[23]-race-detector-runtime from oracular

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076995

Title:
  Remove golang-1.1[23]-race-detector-runtime from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-1.12-race-detector-runtime/+bug/2076995/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2076995] Re: Remove golang-1.12-race-detector-runtime from oracular

** Also affects: golang-1.13-race-detector-runtime (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076995

Title:
  Remove golang-1.12-race-detector-runtime from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-1.12-race-detector-runtime/+bug/2076995/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2076996] Re: Remove golang-1.13-race-detector-runtime from oracular

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2076995 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076995

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2076995
   Remove golang-1.12-race-detector-runtime from oracular

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076996

Title:
  Remove golang-1.13-race-detector-runtime from oracular

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-1.13-race-detector-runtime/+bug/2076996/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2076989] Re: Please remove epiphany-browser on s390x

Removing packages from oracular:
epiphany-browser 46.1-1 in oracular s390x
Comment: FTBFS on s390x (LP: #2076989)
Remove [y|N]? y
1 package successfully removed.


** Changed in: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076989

Title:
  Please remove epiphany-browser on s390x

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/epiphany-browser/+bug/2076989/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2076989] Re: Please remove epiphany-browser on s390x

Hi Jeremy,
did you see in https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/epiphany/-/issues/2429 that they 
want you to move it to the right tracker? Once you do so it would be great to 
also update the reference here.

For the current case, step #1 while I'm probably the biggest mainframe lover.
epiphany-browser really isn't a use case for it and it can go away there to 
allow the general set of v47 uploads to be unblocked.

The question that is left is if it would drag anything down with it.

root@o-prop:~# reverse-depends --build-depends src:epiphany-browser
No reverse dependencies found
root@o-prop:~# reverse-depends src:epiphany-browser
Reverse-Recommends
==
* gnome-core [amd64 arm64 armhf ppc64el s390x]
* junior-desktop(for epiphany-browser)
* junior-internet   (for epiphany-browser)
* phosh-core [amd64 arm64 armhf ppc64el s390x]


Of the Recommends they seem to be ok to me.
- GNOME/Phosh mobile Environment is the anti-s390x and being a recommends it 
would still be ok, just be slightly sad to not get the dep (but still, no one 
would install that on s390x)
- I also think that the DebianJr meta packages are no real use case for s390x
- And finally, while I can see someone using gnome on the mainframe it would 
not be for normal gnome use. Maybe to fulfill dependencies or someone curious 
how they can crash the desktop. But on one hand I'd expect the number of 
lynx/w3m >>> epiphany. So all that is left is a slightly sad, but non breaking 
dependency.

Reverse-Depends
===
* ldh-gui-suite (for epiphany-browser)

You'd think remove that as well as it has no rev-deps either.

root@o-prop:~# reverse-depends src:ldh-gui-suite
No reverse dependencies found

But there is no need, as [1] shows there is no s390x build for ldh-gui-
suite and there never was.

[1]: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ldh-gui-suite/0.1~20200908-6

** Changed in: epiphany-browser (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076989

Title:
  Please remove epiphany-browser on s390x

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/epiphany-browser/+bug/2076989/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2076930] Re: Removal request: python-certbot-dns-google

I agree in general to get rid of python-oauth2client

And gladly certbot upstream indeed recently got ready for what they were
asked for (to allow us to get a much newer version). Adrien already
pinged the Debian case.

I agree that this will soon happen, probably could even still go into
Oracular with an FFe, but is unlikely to happen in time :-/

I see in 2074069 that foundations works on getting rid of the severely
outdated python-oauth2client and after this only 2 dependencies would be
left. So we are almost there.

Furthermore this is gladly "only" an extension to certbot and can go
without dragging the rest down.

But it is a valid use case for users of google DNS API.
And removing this is just as much subject to the Feature Freeze as is updating
it.

While everyone would love to get rid of python-oauth2client, since you
have other dependencies still holding it around removing this one here
in a rush does not gain us much. But OTOH we'd offend the 0.[0]*1% of
people that use this.

Unless I'm missing a stricter reason (like failed to build and be serviceable
or a deeper security concern) I'd Nack the request for now. But I'd would be ok
once either of the following is true:
1. We have a newer certbot version (then it actually does not need to go away
anymore)
2. This would be the last to keep python-oauth2client around (then at least we
have a gain for the price)

So for now, IMHO this is a (temporal) Won't Fix.
I'm happy to get convinced otherwise by arguments or changes in the other
packages that hold in oauth2 (or the certbot update we all wait for).

** Changed in: python-certbot-dns-google (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Won't Fix

--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076930

Title:
Removal request: python-certbot-dns-google

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-certbot-dns-google/+bug/2076930/+subscriptions

--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077506] Re: please remove from oracular archive for plasma 6 transition

AFAICS no related source/bin in oracular-proposed we need to handle
separately.

Removing packages from oracular:
apper 1.0.0-5build2 in oracular
apper 1.0.0-5build2 in oracular amd64
apper 1.0.0-5build2 in oracular arm64
apper 1.0.0-5build2 in oracular armhf
apper 1.0.0-5build2 in oracular ppc64el
apper 1.0.0-5build2 in oracular riscv64
apper 1.0.0-5build2 in oracular s390x
apper-data 1.0.0-5build2 in oracular amd64
apper-data 1.0.0-5build2 in oracular arm64
apper-data 1.0.0-5build2 in oracular armhf
apper-data 1.0.0-5build2 in oracular i386
apper-data 1.0.0-5build2 in oracular ppc64el
apper-data 1.0.0-5build2 in oracular riscv64
apper-data 1.0.0-5build2 in oracular s390x
bismuth 3.1.4-4build2 in oracular
kwin-bismuth 3.1.4-4build2 in oracular amd64
kwin-bismuth 3.1.4-4build2 in oracular arm64
kwin-bismuth 3.1.4-4build2 in oracular armhf
kwin-bismuth 3.1.4-4build2 in oracular ppc64el
kwin-bismuth 3.1.4-4build2 in oracular riscv64
kwin-bismuth 3.1.4-4build2 in oracular s390x
plasma-bigscreen 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular
plasma-bigscreen 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular amd64
plasma-bigscreen 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular arm64
plasma-bigscreen 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular armhf
plasma-bigscreen 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular ppc64el
plasma-bigscreen 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular riscv64
plasma-bigscreen 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular s390x
plasma-mobile 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular
plasma-mobile 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular amd64
plasma-mobile 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular arm64
plasma-mobile 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular armhf
plasma-mobile 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular ppc64el
plasma-mobile 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular riscv64
plasma-mobile 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular s390x
plasma-mobile-tweaks 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular amd64
plasma-mobile-tweaks 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular arm64
plasma-mobile-tweaks 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular armhf
plasma-mobile-tweaks 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular i386
plasma-mobile-tweaks 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular ppc64el
plasma-mobile-tweaks 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular riscv64
plasma-mobile-tweaks 5.27.11-0ubuntu2 in oracular s390x
Comment: incompatible with plasma 6 transition (LP: #2077506)
Remove [y|N]? y
4 packages successfully removed.

** Changed in: apper (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

** Changed in: bismuth (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

** Changed in: plasma-bigscreen (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

** Changed in: plasma-mobile (Ubuntu)
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077506

Title:
  please remove from oracular archive for plasma 6 transition

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apper/+bug/2077506/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2077506] Re: please remove from oracular archive for plasma 6 transition