Configuration of cloud images has nothing to do with packaging of
aptitude.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1227425
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #142699
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=142699
** Also affects: aptitude (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=142699
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** No longer affects: aptitude (Debian)
--
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1236258
Title:
using apt-get gives E: Method gave invalid 200 URI Start message for
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1185262
Title:
ubuntu patch no-google-mock is obsolete
To manage notifications
On 27 June 2014 17:01, Axel Beckert a...@debian.org wrote:
Hi,
Enrico Weigelt, metux ITS wrote:
Aptitude automatically selects recommended packages.
Neither --without-recommends nor setting APT::Install-Recommends seem to
have any influence.
At least on Debian I'm always using aptitude
This clarifies some things to me, but ( :-) ) it is confusing,
since in case the package vanishes from any repository the
candidate is shown as none (or keiner in german),
indicating there is no package with this name available any
more
Right, that does seem inconsistent and I see in
Marking as fixed based on my comment #9. See also bug #831768.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968412
Title:
Next you remove the added repository, by commenting the lines in the
above added file out. Then
apt-get clean all
apt-get update
Calling aptitude after will show no updates available.
Correct. “No updates” means that the current (installed) version is
more recent than any other.
On 6 April 2014 11:05, ianorlin walteror...@gmail.com wrote:
I expected the miscellanous text based programs in synaptic
to not find graphical programs.
Instead I found xcal in the list of miscellanous text based(universe)
programs when broswing by category in synaptic. See attached
This option will not be added in aptitude.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1228868
Title:
Feature Req: Improve
Incomplete for too long. No detail given why this should be
specifically filed against Baltix.
** Changed in: baltix
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Oneiric is no longer supported.
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu Oneiric)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768
Title:
aptitude cannot handle
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1135687 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135687
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1135687
GtkNotebook 0x114d4a0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1450610 is not
mapped
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
On 23 February 2014 14:39, Tomas Pospisek tpo_...@sourcepole.ch wrote:
Bug Watch Updater (bug-watch-updater) on 2014-02-08
Changed in aptitude:
status: New → Incomplete
Robots without brains - contraproductive, automatically wasting
peoples' time
I'm changing status back now
LP
It would be nice to be able to initiate a bug reporting process on a
selected package from within aptitude.
You mean like launching reportbug with the keypress 'B'?
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
On 08/10/2013 2:42 AM, Scott Moser smo...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I moved this to 'aptitude' as the bug because I'd like to keep aptitude
in the images as it is popular with users, but I'd like to *not* have
apt-xapian-index or at least have a way that we could turn it off.
Aptitude will run fine
On 26/08/2013 3:15 PM, Sworddragon 1216...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Public bug reported:
I'm using Ubuntu 13.10 dev with apt 0.9.9.1~ubuntu2. Trying to use the
option -t with apt-get download will result as if the option -t was not
given. Here is an example which shows that the wrong
I use epix but running
apt-get autoremove
as suggested, it reports
epix libglewmx1.5
will be removed.
Why?
What can I do to always keep epix installed?
Nothing here to indicate a bug. Use:
$ sudo apt-mark unmarkauto epix
status invalid
--
You received this bug
On 2 August 2013 19:48, Xava Du xav...@gmail.com wrote:
Public bug reported:
I was trying to solve some unmet dependency problems, so running
apt-get -f -y --force-yes install
-y and --force-yes are only for apt prompts.
i still have prompts like this, waiting for my input:
On 2 August 2013 21:26, Dmitrijs Ledkovs launch...@surgut.co.uk wrote:
http://people.canonical.com/~stokes/aptitude_0.6.8.2-1ubuntu1.raring.debdiff
gives me 404. Was this merge done or not? =)
It did previously exist, however, the work was never completed.
In a few days 0.6.10 will be
On 21/07/2013 7:00 AM, Toby Lambert tlambert...@gmail.com wrote:
Sweet all seemed to update without any problems
status invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1198586
Title:
On 20 July 2013 08:39, Toby Lambert tlambert...@gmail.com wrote:
Seems better
toby@toby-VPCCB15FG:~$ ls -l /bin/uname
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 27072 Nov 20 2012 /bin/uname
Great. Now you should be able to finish installing kernel updates
without issue.
$ sudo apt-get install -f
--
You
What is output of
$ ls -l /bin/uname
$ apt-cache policy coreutils
** Summary changed:
- package linux-image-3.5.0-36-generic 3.5.0-36.57~precise1 failed to
install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/apt-auto-removal exited with
return code 127
+
)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Daniel Hartwig (wigs)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1202001
Title:
aptitude show doesn't work without architecture suffix even if the
package is available
On 19 July 2013 14:27, Toby Lambert tlambert...@gmail.com wrote:
toby@toby-VPCCB15FG:~$ ls -l /bin/uname
ls: cannot access /bin/uname: No such file or directory
Uh oh.
Is that what you wanted?
It is. Please try:
$ sudo apt-get install --reinstall uname
or otherwise use dpkg to reinstall
On 19 July 2013 15:39, Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com wrote:
$ sudo apt-get install --reinstall uname
That should be:
$ sudo apt-get install --reinstall coreutils
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
On 17 July 2013 07:40, Reuben Thomas r...@sc3d.org wrote:
Public bug reported:
Running aptitude show fdflush doesn't work, even though there's a
package fdflush. I checked my spelling very carefully. apt-cache
search fdflush works fine. aptitude show works fine for other package
names I
Public bug reported:
google-mock 1.6.0+svn437-0ubuntu1
gtest 1.6.0-1ubuntu6
The recent upload of this google-mock version continues to be out of
sync and incompatible with the Debian packaging.
The Debian package is setup to use the corresponding libgtest-dev
package, which has to be in sync.
google-mock 1.6.0+svn437-0ubuntu1
This version uses gtest r655 [1] that is recently uploaded to sid as
gtest 1.7.0~svn20130629-2 [2]. Please merge this version of gtest to
resolve the issue.
[1] http://code.google.com/p/googlemock/source/detail?r=437
[2]
** Summary changed:
- google-mock and libgtest-dev out of sync
+ merge gtest 1.7.0~svn20130629-2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1201279
Title:
merge gtest 1.7.0~svn20130629-2
To
On 15 July 2013 06:40, Stephen Michael Kellat skel...@fastmail.net wrote:
Public bug reported:
Imported from Debian bug http://bugs.debian.org/716828:
Package: aptitude
Version: 0.6.8.2-1
Severity: serious
Hi,
[building] aptitude in plain sid (both on mipsel and amd64) ends
with:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1135687 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135687
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1135687
GtkNotebook 0x114d4a0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1450610 is not
mapped
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
On 2 July 2013 16:36, Jane Atkinson 1178...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
I'm not observing this issue any more after recent updates.
Thank you for the update.
status invalid
** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
On 30 June 2013 04:28, Redoubts redou...@gmail.com wrote:
To confuse matters, the kernel images include apparently more recent
images: 3.5.0-28-generic ..
Technically, that's the older kernel from Ubuntu 12.10; note the 3.5, vs
3.8 for others.
Regarding your rhetorical part, we should also
On 29 June 2013 06:56, ill 1186...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
I just tried the command again, and now I get: # /usr/bin/synaptic-pkexec
That command should be run as the desktop user, not root. The prompt
(#) indicates running as root. If you run as the logged in user, then
it should work as
On 28 June 2013 16:17, Iain Lane i...@orangesquash.org.uk wrote:
I'm guessing you got that from the changes file (or Launchpad's view of
it)? Those aren't quite the same as Debian changelogs, although
obviously they are parsed from them.
Yes, from Launchpad. I see. Ok.
--
You received
On 27 June 2013 12:03, Flavio Martins Prado flavio.mpr...@gmail.com wrote:
The problem is probably caused by a configuration of synaptic saved on
the ROOT directory. After purging synaptic, the configuration files
should be removed, but they aren't... I coud find a .synaptic in root
and in my
2013/6/27 Daniel Letzeisen 1195...@bugs.launchpad.net:
** Package changed: nvidia-graphics-drivers (Ubuntu) = apt (Ubuntu)
Some more effort in triage, please. Apt is not a dumping ground for
bugs.
BlackStarMI wrote (delocalized):
dpkg: error: file triggers record mentions illegal package name
Public bug reported:
The changelog entry for 2.37.3-1ubuntu1 is unterminated [1], flowing in
to the next entry for the unreleased debian changes. The following does
not conform to changelog format as defined by debian-policy [2]:
glib2.0 (2.37.3-1ubuntu1) saucy; urgency=low
* Resynchronise
** Changed in: apturl (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919521
Title:
apturl says index is broken when it is not
To manage notifications about
** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) = debconf (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1193513
Title:
updates do not install
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
On 22 June 2013 06:57, ill 919...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
I get a message saying package installation failed:
man-db
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Those two lines are the _complete_ output from the command?
--
You received this bug
And I repeat my other queries:
[Do you] get this error with any URI, or only some specific ones?
Please give an example of a failing URI.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/919521
On 22 June 2013 06:47, ill 1186...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
kubuntu 13.10, synaptic .80
yes the command starts synaptic.
Looks like an issue with kdesudo, or perhaps your terminal
environment. Which terminal are you using (konsole, gnome-terminal,
etc.)?
affects ubuntu/synaptic
status
On 20 June 2013 13:41, Marshall McMullen 919...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
I'm still seeing this exact problem on ubuntu 13.04. So I don't see how
this is fixed.
‘Fix Committed’ and ‘Fix Released’ are different; there is no claim
that this is fixed in Ubuntu.
This particular issue is resolved
On 19 June 2013 23:39, Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 June 2013 09:41, Gary Shook garyfsh...@gmail.com wrote:
I cleaned it up using the following:
dpkg -l linux-* | awk '/^ii/{ print $2}' | grep -v -e `uname -r | cut -f1,2
-d-` | grep -e [0-9] | xargs sudo apt-get -y purge
I
apt 0.9.7.5ubuntu5.4
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Quantal)
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/923876
Title:
FR: Limit and clean-up kernel
On 21 June 2013 02:09, John Karahalis john.karaha...@gmail.com wrote:
Still have this issue on a fresh install of Raring.
Note that kernel images installed before this change was made in apt
0.9.7.6ubuntu1 will still have to be removed manually. If you find
that subsequent kernel images are not
On 19 June 2013 09:41, Gary Shook garyfsh...@gmail.com wrote:
I cleaned it up using the following:
dpkg -l linux-* | awk '/^ii/{ print $2}' | grep -v -e `uname -r | cut -f1,2
-d-` | grep -e [0-9] | xargs sudo apt-get -y purge
I donn't have the output before cleanup, but I can tell you it was
On 19 June 2013 14:30, Michael McAndrew 1191...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
I then rebooted and did an 'ls -lR /boot' and a 'sudo aptitude-upgrade'
As you are using aptitude to upgrade old kernel images will not be
automatically removed (bug #923876). Those should be removed manually
to free up
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1135687 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135687
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1135687
GtkNotebook 0x114d4a0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1450610 is not
mapped
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
On 19/06/2013 8:51 AM, Gary Shook garyfsh...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not use aptitude, and do not have unattended-upgrades installed.
at this point, I get a system error on boot, and just need to fix it... I
cleaned up /boot it had no space left.
How did you clean it up, by removing files or
Redoubts, your issue may not be the same cause, so please file a new
report using ‘ubuntu-bug’, including the information here, and also some
comments on how you install and update software (e.g. apt-get, aptitude,
software-center).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Gary Shook, do you at all use aptitude or have unattended-upgrades
installed?
Please provide the output of:
$ ls -lR boot
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1191389
Title:
package
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 75332
aptitude has private package holds, should use dpkg
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/111566
Title:
adept dist-upgrade now dialog
No program is encouraged to interface with aptitude holds, these are
very soon to be replaced by the universal dpkg holds.
** Changed in: update-manager
Status: New = Invalid
** Summary changed:
- Held back packages not ignored by update-manager
+ aptitude has private package holds,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 42178 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42178
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 75332
aptitude has private package holds, should use dpkg
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 42178
synaptic: ‘Lock Version’ is broken; use dpkg
Daniel Hahler (blueyed) wrote on 2007-12-17:
This sounds like a duplicate of bug 72806 (pinned packages
are held) and I'm marking it as such.
No, apt_preferences(5) and package holds are two separate
concepts with different use cases.
Unmarking duplicate. It may however have been fixed in the
Previous KDE bugwatch was not correct (related to held packages, not
preferences). Further, if adept notifier is ignoring apt_preferences
that is a bug, not wishlist item.
** Summary changed:
- Adept notifier with pinning
+ Adept notifier with pinning; apt_preferences(5)
--
You received this
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 118474 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/118474
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 75332
aptitude has private package holds, should use dpkg
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 118474
Adept should allow to ignore updates
--
You
Richard Birnie (rbirnie-deactivatedaccount) wrote on 2007-07-01:
What you're
describing is basically version pinning which has been requested in bug
113846.
The other bug is reporting that apt_preferences(5) are ignored. This
request is to add a feature to the adept notifier interface so that
Untested and dont care.
** Patch added: aptitude-saucy.diff
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/923876/+attachment/3705236/+files/aptitude-saucy.diff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On 14 June 2013 04:30, ill 1014...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
It was already removed after I did the chattr command.
Next time, if someone asks for output from commands please take care
that you do it before resolving the problem. Otherwise the output is
useless.
In any case, it is clear now
ill, does the patch on bug 1084190 resolve the issue you report here
or not? It is not constructive to change bug tags and status without
answering these simple questions.
On 13 June 2013 03:30, ill 1093...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
** Tags added: kernel-unable-to-test-upstream
** Changed in:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1084190 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084190
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1084190
kernel panic when removing mceusb module
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Daniel Hartwig (wigs)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
On 25 May 2013 22:58, dino99 844...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
Yes well this particular issue persists and the suggestion is useful.
status confirmed
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status:
On 11 June 2013 04:33, ill 1093...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
It has been tested now.
And does that patch resolve the issue you reporting on this bug?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On 10 June 2013 22:34, Christian Smith 1189...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libgraphite2-3 : Conflicts: libgraphite2-3:i386 but 1.2.1-1 is to be
installed.
libgraphite2-3:i386 : Conflicts: libgraphite2-3 but 1.2.1-1 is installed.
That is not
On 7 June 2013 00:10, Sunflower 1188...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Public bug reported:
I had 5-6 contacts in the K address book. This program would not open. Thus,
I uninstalled it, to reinstall. It will not.
You have not specified which version of synaptic and ubuntu you are
using.
I discovered a possible bug in the apt-get remove command, it actually
broke my whole system, and removed all my packages.
Well, you pretty much asked it to, so that is not a bug.
status invalid
I was trying to remove Wine 1.3 devel from my machine. This package
contains several
unattended-upgrade does not directly handle dependencies, and its only
effective calls are to ‘mark_upgrade’.
08:36 slangasek ah, there's a single call to
mark_install() in u-a, so that would
be nice and convenient if so
In ‘upgrade_in_minimal_steps’,
On 6 June 2013 11:14, Daniel Hartwig mand...@gmail.com wrote:
In ‘upgrade_in_minimal_steps’, but conditional on:
elif not pkg.is_installed:
pkg.mark_install()
Also unrelated, though this call should be removed based on my earlier
reasoning that it is never used
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #686726
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686726
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1175637
Title:
Kernel updates are being
** Bug watch removed: Debian Bug tracker #686726
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=686726
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1175637
Title:
Kernel updates are being
Revert unexplained spam.
** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1075841
Title:
read/write selections (markings) causes
‘MarkInstall’ has changed quite a bit since version in precise,
including much in the ways of handling auto-installed. Can someone
provide an apt log with Debug::pkgDepCache::Marker and
Debug::pkgDepCache::AutoInstall set.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Agreeing with Steve, this is an obviously incorrect application of
Never-MarkAuto-Sections.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Patch from http://people.canonical.com/~henrix/lp1084190/v1/.
** Patch added: 0001-mceusb-Fix-race-in-mceusb_dev_disconnect.patch
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1084190/+attachment/3694043/+files/0001-mceusb-Fix-race-in-mceusb_dev_disconnect.patch
** Tags added: patch
** Description changed:
+ I am also having this problem.
+
+ $ sudo do-release-upgrade
+ Checking for a new Ubuntu release
+ Get:1 Upgrade tool signature [198 B]
+ Get:2 Upgrade tool [1,206 kB]
+ Fetched 1,206 kB in 0s (0 B/s)
+ authenticate 'raring.tar.gz' against 'raring.tar.gz.gpg'
+
** Summary changed:
- ubuntu has kernel panic when manually removing modules
+ kernel panic when removing mceusb module
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084190
Title:
kernel panic
This started happening to me again when trying to upgrade to 13.04.
What did? The problem with noexec?
status:New → Confirmed
Again, please do not confirm your own bugs. It has already been
explained that the issue on your system with noexec is not a bug.
** Changed in:
On 2 June 2013 15:02, ill 1058...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
apt-get is provided by the official ubuntu repos.
It has already been explained why apt is not at fault here and will
not be adapted to handle this kind of breakage. The problem is in the
package ‘brscan2’ which Ubuntu does not
The status of ‘new’ is for ubuntu-release-upgrader to verify the issue
reported by Richard Cheung.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/994152
Title:
do-release-upgrade says it can not run
Please test the proposed fix.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084190
Title:
ubuntu has kernel panic when manually
You get this error with any URI, or only some specific ones? Please
give an example of a failing URI.
What is the output of running this command in a terminal:
$ sudo apturl apt:tf
** Changed in: apturl (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification
** Changed in: apturl (Ubuntu)
Assignee: j4v13r (j4v13r) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228264
Title:
[MASTER] non-existing section 'web' added to sources.list by
ever since 12.10, whenever I remove the module mceusb using rmmod
mceusb,
This sounds very similar to your report bug #1084190. On that report
there is a patched kernel that you are yet to test.
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Incomplete
--
You received this bug
You report similar issues as bug #1084190 and bug #1093922. Is this
lock up also related to removing the mceusb module?
If not, provide the information requested in comment #3.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: Adrian Perez (apere125) = (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification
On 2 June 2013 15:59, Richard Cheung 994...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
Hi,
I have found a solution.
sudo apt-get install python-apt
After this, do-release-upgrade does work for you?
Which version of python-apt did you upgrade from and to?
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Summary changed:
- sudo rm -R filename does not remove a file
+ can not remove ldlinux.sys; sudo rm -Rf ldlinux.sys
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Confirmed = New
** Package changed: ubuntu = coreutils (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
What filesystem is this drive using? Provide output from ‘mount’ to
confirm.
Provide the complete output from executing:
$ sudo rm -f ldlinux.sys
Operation not permitted? Most likely cause of that on this file is attribute
immutable. Remove it with:
$ sudo chattr -i ldlinux.sys
** Changed
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
And it says that running apt-get update will fix these problems, but it does
not.
The intent of that message — which is not completely clear — is that
running ‘apt-get update’ may resolve general issues. It is not
specifically
You must state the version of Ubuntu and synaptic you are using.
What is the output of running:
$ /usr/bin/synaptic-pkexec
Does that command properly start synaptic?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
For example apt-get download
--ignore-missing htop ia33-libs will stop on ia33-libs because the package
doesn't exist but htop will not be downloaded then too.
Ignore missing applies to packages that fail to download correctly but
are otherwise known to apt. The command issued is valid, but
The documentation makes clear that ‘--only-upgrade’ applies its
restriction to the packages specified on the command line only. Its
purpose is to prevent the user accidentally asking for new software. It
is not intended to restrict upgrades of existing software including e.g.
if such an upgrade
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/844485
Title:
apt-get man page language/grammar improvement for autoremove
To manage
On 1 June 2013 16:21, Sworddragon 844...@bugs.launchpad.net wrote:
The command itself is not invalid because the package names are just
arguments.
The arguments of ‘apt-get install’ are defined to be packages,
‘ia33-libs’ does not name any package, hence the command line /as a
whole/ is
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #548501
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548501
** Also affects: apt (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=548501
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 42178
synaptic: ‘Lock Version’ is broken; use dpkg hold
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/823961
Title:
synaptic ignores preferences files
1 - 100 of 732 matches
Mail list logo
