[Bug 1852016] Re: Applications delayed on launch

2021-02-17 Thread Digulla-hepe
Just a heads up: I'm seeing exactly the same behavior on OpenSUSE LEAP
15.2

This happens with Xfce4 desktop.

It seems to be a rare bug; no one has hard about this when I asked on
the mailing list.

I did some debugging of keepassxc (since it's a relatively small app).

Installed some debug packages, then "gdb keypassxc", wait 5 seconds
until it stops printing "[New Thread 0x7fffe945b700 (LWP 18090)]", then
Ctrl+C to get the stack traces.

"info threads" to see which threads there are. "thread " + id to switch
between them.

The app hangs for 25 seconds when I try to start it which matches this
timeout:

__GI___poll (fds=0x55f994d0, nfds=1, timeout=25000) at
../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/poll.c:29

Googling returned this analysis:

https://freefilesync.org/forum/viewtopic.php?t=6704

The stack traces look very similar: Threads hanging in __lll_lock_wait
and __GI___poll called from ibus_bus_new_async_client and
g_simple_async_result_get_type respectively.

In the mean time, I've found more apps with the same symptom:

- qmmp

- qtconfig ("Qt 4 settings" in the Xfce settings dialog.)

I'm wondering about this line in the stack trace:

/usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/styles/libqgtk2style.so

Maybe there is a bug in the Qt style which I'm using.

Stack frame 45 says style is
"QGtk2Theme::themeHint(QPlatformTheme::ThemeHint)
const::{lambda()#1}::operator()() const::qstring_literal"

which would match the setting in the "Qt 4 settings" dialog but I'm
using Qt5. Or is the dialog for both?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1852016

Title:
  Applications delayed on launch

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus/+bug/1852016/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1846712] Re: ImportError: No module named backports.ssl_match_hostname

2019-11-25 Thread Digulla-hepe
Test cases:

python2 -c "import backports.ssl_match_hostname"
docker-compose --version

Fix / workaround (as root):

echo "# package" > /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-
packages/backports/__init__.py

Note: I'm not sure whether sudo will work with output redirection.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846712

Title:
  ImportError: No module named backports.ssl_match_hostname

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/docker-compose/+bug/1846712/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1292041] Re: Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen

2019-06-21 Thread Digulla-hepe
Possible duplicates: Bug #1612010 and Bug #1594989

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292041

Title:
  Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1292041/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1292041] Re: Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen

2019-06-21 Thread Digulla-hepe
Same problem as everyone else: Locking the screen with Win+L turns off
the monitors (I get "Signal lost" warnings on them) but after a minute
or so, something turns them back on.

xset q reports:

DPMS (Energy Star):
  Standby: 0Suspend: 0Off: 0
  DPMS is Enabled
  Monitor is On

Note: The same happens when I force the monitors to turn off with

xset dpms force off

In the journal, I see these entries after shutting off the monitors at
13:57:51:

Jun 21 13:58:16 linux01 /usr/lib/gdm3/gdm-x-session[2471]: (II) modeset(0): 
EDID vendor "HWP", prod id 12816
Jun 21 13:58:16 linux01 /usr/lib/gdm3/gdm-x-session[2471]: (II) modeset(0): 
Using hsync ranges from config file
Jun 21 13:58:16 linux01 /usr/lib/gdm3/gdm-x-session[2471]: (II) modeset(0): 
Using vrefresh ranges from config file
Jun 21 13:58:16 linux01 /usr/lib/gdm3/gdm-x-session[2471]: (II) modeset(0): 
Printing DDC gathered Modelines:
Jun 21 13:58:16 linux01 /usr/lib/gdm3/gdm-x-session[2471]: (II) modeset(0): 
Modeline "1920x1200"x0.0  154.00  1920 1968 2000 2080  1200 1203 1209 1235 
+hsync -vsync (74.0 kHz eP)
...
Jun 21 13:58:19 linux01 gnome-shell[2611]: STACK_OP_RAISE_ABOVE: sibling window 
0x54017c3 not in stack
Jun 21 13:58:19 linux01 gnome-shell[2611]: STACK_OP_RAISE_ABOVE: sibling window 
0x54017c3 not in stack
Jun 21 13:58:19 linux01 gnome-shell[2611]: STACK_OP_RAISE_ABOVE: sibling window 
0x54017c3 not in stack

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1292041

Title:
  Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/oem-priority/+bug/1292041/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1594989] Re: Turn off screen after n minutes does not work in Ubuntu 16.04

2019-06-21 Thread Digulla-hepe
Duplicate of Bug #1292041 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source
/gnome-screensaver/+bug/1292041

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1594989

Title:
  Turn off screen after n minutes does not work in Ubuntu 16.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/1594989/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1612010] Re: Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen

2019-06-21 Thread Digulla-hepe
Duplicate of Bug #1292041

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1612010

Title:
  Lockscreen doesn't turn off the screen

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-screensaver/+bug/1612010/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1182784] Re: Install with non English language fails on Keyboard: ubi-console-setup failed with exit code 141 or Installer Crashed

2014-09-02 Thread Digulla-hepe
Scott,  thanks for explaining how to enable trusty-proposed.

Unfortunately, this doesn't help at all since the bug happens when
installing from DVD or USB stick, so we really need an ISO image which
contains the new package.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182784

Title:
  Install with non English language fails on Keyboard: ubi-console-
  setup failed with exit code 141 or Installer Crashed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1182784/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1223181] Re: After upgrading to saucy, eclipse crashes in gtk_tree_view_get_background_area+0x8a while debugging

2014-03-21 Thread Digulla-hepe
Related bug in Eclipse's Bugzilla:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=421073

** Bug watch added: Eclipse bugs #421073
   https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=421073

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1223181

Title:
  After upgrading to saucy, eclipse crashes in
  gtk_tree_view_get_background_area+0x8a while debugging

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+2.0/+bug/1223181/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1182784] Re: Install with German / Swiss Keyboard fails: ubi-console-setup failed with exit code 141 or Installer Crashed

2013-06-25 Thread Digulla-hepe
As a workaround: Is there a script / command which I can use to set the
keyboard to Swiss German after the installation has succeeded with a
German keyboard layout?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182784

Title:
  Install with German / Swiss Keyboard fails: ubi-console-setup failed
  with exit code 141 or Installer Crashed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1182784/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1163745] Re: GPG error: http://security.ubuntu.com quantal-security Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key ftpmas...@ubuntu.

2013-04-09 Thread Digulla-hepe
I found that by disabling the company wide cache settings, the error
goes away. But the files in the cache look good :-/ Is there a way to
see what specifically the tool doesn't like? Is there a debug mode or
something?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1163745

Title:
  GPG error: http://security.ubuntu.com quantal-security Release: The
  following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu
  Archive Automatic Signing Key ftpmas...@ubuntu.com

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1163745/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1163745] Re: GPG error: http://security.ubuntu.com quantal-security Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key ftpmas...@ubuntu.

2013-04-05 Thread Digulla-hepe
You have 100% sure that the signatures on the Ubuntu servers haven't
been tampered with?

If the signatures on your server are correct, how can I find out in
which step of the chain they were corrupted?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1163745

Title:
  GPG error: http://security.ubuntu.com quantal-security Release: The
  following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu
  Archive Automatic Signing Key ftpmas...@ubuntu.com

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1163745/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1163745] [NEW] GPG error: http://security.ubuntu.com quantal-security Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key ftpmas...@ubunt

2013-04-03 Thread Digulla-hepe
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***

Public security bug reported:

When running apt-get update, I see these warnings:

Reading package lists... Error!
W: GPG error: http://security.ubuntu.com quantal-security Release: The 
following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive 
Automatic Signing Key ftpmas...@ubuntu.com
W: GPG error: http://ch.archive.ubuntu.com quantal-updates Release: The 
following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive 
Automatic Signing Key ftpmas...@ubuntu.com

Following the advice on 
http://askubuntu.com/questions/131601/how-to-overcome-signature-verification-error
I deleted the lists and updated again but the error persists.

I also tried to add the key:

 apt-key adv --keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 40976EAF437D05B5
Executing: gpg --ignore-time-conflict --no-options --no-default-keyring 
--secret-keyring /tmp/tmp.MhtBtqxmAw --trustdb-name /etc/apt//trustdb.gpg 
--keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --primary-keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg 
--keyserver keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 40976EAF437D05B5
gpg: requesting key 437D05B5 from hkp server keyserver.ubuntu.com
gpg: key 437D05B5: Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key 
ftpmas...@ubuntu.com not changed
gpg: Total number processed: 1
gpg:  unchanged: 1

So the key seems to be installed already and it seems to be correct.

What should I do next?

PS: I flagged this as security vulnerability since it prevents me from
installing security updates.

** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Information type changed from Private Security to Public Security

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1163745

Title:
  GPG error: http://security.ubuntu.com quantal-security Release: The
  following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu
  Archive Automatic Signing Key ftpmas...@ubuntu.com

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1163745/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1044144] Re: Upgrade from kubuntu 12.04 to 12.10 failed using sudo do-release-upgrade -d

2012-10-29 Thread Digulla-hepe
Same error message but different package:

dpkg: error: parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 9758 package 
'libreoffice3.5-dict-fr':
 mixed non-coinstallable and coinstallable package instances present

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044144

Title:
  Upgrade from kubuntu 12.04 to 12.10 failed using sudo do-release-
  upgrade -d 

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1044144/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1044144] Re: Upgrade from kubuntu 12.04 to 12.10 failed using sudo do-release-upgrade -d

2012-10-29 Thread Digulla-hepe
main.log for error in libreoffice3.5-dict-fr

** Attachment added: main.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1044144/+attachment/3417397/+files/main.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044144

Title:
  Upgrade from kubuntu 12.04 to 12.10 failed using sudo do-release-
  upgrade -d 

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1044144/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1016294] Re: ia32-libs-multiarch but it is not installable

2012-10-29 Thread Digulla-hepe
When I try to install the missing page, I get this:

 apt-get install ia32-libs-multiarch
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
Package ia32-libs-multiarch is not available, but is referred to by another 
package.
This may mean that the package is missing, has been obsoleted, or
is only available from another source

E: Package 'ia32-libs-multiarch' has no installation candidate


So it seems that there is simply no such package. In which source should it be?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016294

Title:
  ia32-libs-multiarch but it is not installable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs/+bug/1016294/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1016294] Re: ia32-libs-multiarch but it is not installable

2012-10-29 Thread Digulla-hepe
Package search says it's in universe:
http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?keywords=ia32-libs-
multiarchsearchon=namessuite=quantalsection=all

In my /etc/apt/sources.list, I have this line:

deb http://ch.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ quantal universe

*puzzled*

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016294

Title:
  ia32-libs-multiarch but it is not installable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs/+bug/1016294/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1016294] Re: ia32-libs-multiarch but it is not installable

2012-10-29 Thread Digulla-hepe
Note: When I run this

 apt-get upgrade

I get more errors:

Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 ia32-libs : Depends: ia32-libs-multiarch but it is not installable
 libc6-dev : Depends: libc6 (= 2.15-0ubuntu20) but 2.15-0ubuntu10.3 is installed
 libpoppler28 : Depends: libfontconfig1 (= 2.9.0) but 2.8.0-3ubuntu9.1 is 
installed
 nspluginwrapper : Depends: nspluginviewer (= 1.4.4-0ubuntu4) but it is not 
installable
 texlive-base : Depends: texlive-doc-base (= 2012.20120516) but 2009-2 is 
installed
Depends: texlive-common (= 2012.20120516) but 2009-15 is 
installed
Depends: tex-common (= 3) but 2.10 is installed
 texlive-binaries : Depends: libfontconfig1 (= 2.9.0) but 2.8.0-3ubuntu9.1 is 
installed
Depends: texlive-common (= 2011) but 2009-15 is installed
Depends: tex-common (= 3) but 2.10 is installed
E: Unmet dependencies. Try using -f.

So this is probably a bug in apt.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016294

Title:
  ia32-libs-multiarch but it is not installable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs/+bug/1016294/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1044144] Re: Upgrade from kubuntu 12.04 to 12.10 failed using sudo do-release-upgrade -d

2012-10-29 Thread Digulla-hepe
This is a bug in the file /var/lib/dpkg/status

I found that it contains two entries for some packages:


Package: libreoffice3.5-dict-fr
Status: install ok installed
Installed-Size: 6796
Maintainer: Oracle
Architecture: amd64
Version: 3.5.1-102
Depends: libreoffice3.5-ure, libobasis3.5-core01, libobasis3.5-core02, 
libobasis3.5-core03, libobasis3.5-core04, libobasis3.5-core05, 
libobasis3.5-core06, libobasis3.5-core07, libreoffice3.5
Description: Fr dictionary for LibreOffice 3.5
 Copyright: 1999-2010 by Oracle
 Fr dictionary for LibreOffice 3.5

Package: libreoffice3.5-dict-fr
Status: deinstall ok config-files
Installed-Size: 6796
Maintainer: Oracle
Architecture: i386
Version: 3.5.1-102
Config-Version: 3.5.1-102
Depends: libreoffice3.5-ure, libobasis3.5-core01, libobasis3.5-core02, 
libobasis3.5-core03, libobasis3.5-core04, libobasis3.5-core05, 
libobasis3.5-core06, libobasis3.5-core07, libreoffice3.5
Description: Fr dictionary for LibreOffice 3.5
 Copyright: 1999-2010 by Oracle
 Fr dictionary for LibreOffice 3.5

Most lines are the same but these:

Status: install ok installed
Status: deinstall ok config-files

Architecture: amd64
Architecture: i386

Maybe the upgrade tried to switch from the i386 to amd64?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1044144

Title:
  Upgrade from kubuntu 12.04 to 12.10 failed using sudo do-release-
  upgrade -d 

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1044144/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1016294] Re: ia32-libs-multiarch but it is not installable

2012-10-29 Thread Digulla-hepe
Might be related: I had ia32-crossover-pro installed (Crossover is a
commercial version of wine).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016294

Title:
  ia32-libs-multiarch but it is not installable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs/+bug/1016294/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 983543] Re: Internal Error, No file name for libc6

2012-10-29 Thread Digulla-hepe
@agent: Thanks, that helped to get apt-get into a reasonable state of
mind after being hit by this bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs/+bug/1016294

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/983543

Title:
  Internal Error, No file name for libc6

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/983543/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1016294] Re: ia32-libs-multiarch but it is not installable

2012-10-29 Thread Digulla-hepe
I solved the issue eventually by manually purging libc6:i386 and every
dependency. If you need to do the same, here is a helper:

echo $(dpkg --purge libc6:i386 | grep depends on|grep :i386|cut -d 
-f2)

This will purge something and print everything that prevents the purge
to complete. You can then cutpaste the output between libc6:i386 and
| until the command doesn't print anything anymore.

Eventually, I got everything cleaned up but had this error:

Internal Error, No file name for libc6

See comment #7 of this issue for a solution:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/983543/comments/7

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1016294

Title:
  ia32-libs-multiarch but it is not installable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs/+bug/1016294/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1035517] Re: package nvidia-current 302.17-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2012-10-29 Thread Digulla-hepe
I just got this error after upgrading to 12.10 (quantal).

My nvidia-current version is 304.51.really.304.43-0ubuntu1
I have python-xkit 0.5.0 installed

The source of the problem is that the files in /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-
packages/Quirks/* want XKit (first two letters uppercase) but the
python package exports xkit (all lowercase).

The workaround was pretty simple: Replace all XKit with xkit in all
*.py files in the Quirks folder.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035517

Title:
  package nvidia-current 302.17-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers/+bug/1035517/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 97513] Re: Squid requires restart after Network Manager made connection to network

2012-04-16 Thread Digulla-hepe
I can't confirm this. I'm on Ubuntu 11.10 oneiric with squid
2.7.STABLE9-4ubuntu4 and the bug is still there.

I tried to start squid after networking by changing the start on line
in /etc/init/squid.conf to

start on (started networking)

but that doesn't help. The cache.log still says:

2012/04/16 08:52:37| Warning: Could not find any nameservers. Trying to use 
localhost
2012/04/16 08:52:37| Please check your /etc/resolv.conf file
2012/04/16 08:52:37| or use the 'dns_nameservers' option in squid.conf.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to squid in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97513

Title:
  Squid requires restart after Network Manager made connection to
  network

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid/+bug/97513/+subscriptions

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 97513] Re: Squid requires restart after Network Manager made connection to network

2012-04-16 Thread Digulla-hepe
I can't confirm this. I'm on Ubuntu 11.10 oneiric with squid
2.7.STABLE9-4ubuntu4 and the bug is still there.

I tried to start squid after networking by changing the start on line
in /etc/init/squid.conf to

start on (started networking)

but that doesn't help. The cache.log still says:

2012/04/16 08:52:37| Warning: Could not find any nameservers. Trying to use 
localhost
2012/04/16 08:52:37| Please check your /etc/resolv.conf file
2012/04/16 08:52:37| or use the 'dns_nameservers' option in squid.conf.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/97513

Title:
  Squid requires restart after Network Manager made connection to
  network

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/squid/+bug/97513/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 778627] Re: In natty, bash completion now quotes shell variable references rather than expanding them

2012-02-22 Thread Digulla-hepe
Maybe this forum post might help to fix the bug:
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-general-1/bash-auto-
complete-of-environment-variables-613203/#post3055141

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/778627

Title:
  In natty, bash completion now quotes shell variable references rather
  than expanding them

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/778627/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 858122] Re: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished)

2011-10-14 Thread Digulla-hepe
I had this problem, too, and I don't have VMWare installed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858122

Title:
  incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been
  demolished)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-release-notes/+bug/858122/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 811441] Re: Unable to connect to the system bus: Failed to connect to socket /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: Connection refused (oneiric)

2011-10-14 Thread Digulla-hepe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 858122 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858122

Try the recipe from comment #24 if you see these errors during boot:

Waiting for network configuration...
Waiting up to 60 more seconds for network configuration...

or when you have odd timeouts during boot or when the KDE daemon crashes
at startup.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811441

Title:
  Unable to connect to the system bus: Failed to connect to socket
  /var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket: Connection refused (oneiric)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dbus/+bug/811441/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 833841] Re: libgl1-mesa-glx alternative link

2011-08-29 Thread Digulla-hepe
I have the same problem on Natty. The root cause seems to be this line:

setting up libgl1-mesa-glx (7.10.2-0ubuntu2.1) ...
update-alternatives: error: alternative link /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules is 
already managed by i386-linux-gnu_gl_conf.
dpkg: error processing libgl1-mesa-glx (--configure):
 subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

My guess is that this is because of the Nvidia driver because of the
content of /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules:

$ ll /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 53 2011-08-08 09:30 /usr/lib/xorg/extra-modules - 
/etc/alternatives/x86_64-linux-gnu_xorg_extra_modules/
$ ll /etc/alternatives/x86_64-linux-gnu_xorg_extra_modules/
total 12960
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root4096 2011-08-08 09:30 ./
drwxr-xr-x 6 root root4096 2011-08-08 09:30 ../
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root  16 2011-08-08 09:30 libglx.so - libglx.so.280.13
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6356552 2011-08-01 20:23 libglx.so.280.13
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6901792 2011-08-01 20:23 nvidia_drv.so

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833841

Title:
  libgl1-mesa-glx alternative link

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/833841/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 835922] Re: package libgl1-mesa-glx 7.10.2-0ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2

2011-08-29 Thread Digulla-hepe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 833841 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833841

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 833841
   libgl1-mesa-glx alternative link

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/835922

Title:
  package libgl1-mesa-glx 7.10.2-0ubuntu2.1 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/835922/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 833841] Re: libgl1-mesa-glx alternative link

2011-08-29 Thread Digulla-hepe
Update: I'm not using the standard Nvidia driver because I of a bug in
the r8169 driver (see bug 821454). To fix that, I installed kernel 3.0.1
(see comment #3).

After that, I needed the Nvidia driver from xorg edgers (nvidia-
current_285.03-0ubuntu1~edgers~natty1_amd64.deb)

A workaround to fix the bug here, I removed nvidia-current, did the
update and reinstalled.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/833841

Title:
  libgl1-mesa-glx alternative link

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/833841/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 783155] Re: Natty: Loader chooses 64-bit instead of 32-bit library

2011-08-15 Thread Digulla-hepe
Steve: Anything that I should include in the bug report (like HOWOT
links or similar)?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/783155

Title:
  Natty: Loader chooses 64-bit instead of 32-bit library

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs/+bug/783155/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 821454] Re: r8169 hangs after many link up

2011-08-08 Thread Digulla-hepe
Installing this kernel solves the issue: http://kernel.ubuntu.com
/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.0.1-oneiric/

I also had to update the NVIDIA driver using the version from this PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~xorg-
edgers/+archive/ppa/+packages?field.name_filter=nvidiafield.status_filter=publishedfield.series_filter=

Note that this is bleeding edge stuff. My system did boot and X did come
up and so far, it seems to be stable.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821454

Title:
  r8169 hangs after many link up

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/821454/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 783155] Re: Natty: Loader chooses 64-bit instead of 32-bit library

2011-08-08 Thread Digulla-hepe
I think the openSUSE approach makes more sense than the debian one:
64bit compliant code must know about the 32/64bit difference while
legacy 32bit apps usually don't.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/783155

Title:
  Natty: Loader chooses 64-bit instead of 32-bit library

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs/+bug/783155/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 821454] [NEW] r8169 hangs after many link up

2011-08-05 Thread Digulla-hepe
Public bug reported:

I experienced mysterious hangs of the machine. No crash, no kernel
panic, Alt+SysRq didn't work, NumLock was dead.

After some experiments, I found this recipe to reproduce the problem:

1. Download something large (like a big git repository) from another
machine that is on the same gigabit LAN (you need quite some throuput).

In the syslog, you'll start to see messages like these:

Aug  5 14:27:48 adigulla kernel: [ 1491.908445] r8169 :03:00.0: eth0: link 
up
Aug  5 14:27:49 adigulla kernel: [ 1492.417302] r8169 :03:00.0: eth0: link 
up
Aug  5 14:27:49 adigulla kernel: [ 1492.556858] r8169 :03:00.0: eth0: link 
up
Aug  5 14:27:50 adigulla kernel: [ 1492.965761] r8169 :03:00.0: eth0: link 
up
Aug  5 14:27:50 adigulla kernel: [ 1493.135401] r8169 :03:00.0: eth0: link 
up
Aug  5 14:27:50 adigulla kernel: [ 1493.484479] r8169 :03:00.0: eth0: link 
up
Aug  5 14:27:50 adigulla kernel: [ 1493.644146] r8169 :03:00.0: eth0: link 
up
Aug  5 14:27:51 adigulla kernel: [ 1494.342378] r8169 :03:00.0: eth0: link 
up
Aug  5 14:27:51 adigulla kernel: [ 1494.432170] r8169 :03:00.0: eth0: link 
up
Aug  5 14:27:54 adigulla kernel: [ 1497.235083] net_ratelimit: 11 callbacks 
suppressed
Aug  5 14:27:54 adigulla kernel: [ 1497.235087] r8169 :03:00.0: eth0: link 
up

2. Now start something which hogs the hard disk (like building a linux
kernel).

Eventually, the whole system will hang.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: linux-generic 2.6.38.11.26
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-11.48-generic 2.6.38.8
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-11-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.23.
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  adigulla   2087 F pulseaudio
CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
Card0.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:0 'Intel'/'HDA Intel at 0xf3ff8000 irq 55'
   Mixer name   : 'Realtek ALC887'
   Components   : 'HDA:10ec0887,1043840b,00100202'
   Controls  : 24
   Simple ctrls  : 14
Card1.Amixer.info:
 Card hw:1 'NVidia'/'HDA NVidia at 0xf7dfc000 irq 17'
   Mixer name   : 'Nvidia GPU 12 HDMI/DP'
   Components   : 'HDA:10de0012,10de0101,00100100'
   Controls  : 16
   Simple ctrls  : 4
Date: Fri Aug  5 15:06:14 2011
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=58b8fc76-dcbe-4a54-81fe-f4c07457225d
IwConfig:
 lono wireless extensions.
 
 eth0  no wireless extensions.
MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.38-11-generic 
root=UUID=7e4939e5-9658-4007-8eb0-3185046ffaac ro splash quiet vt.handoff=7
RelatedPackageVersions:
 linux-restricted-modules-2.6.38-11-generic N/A
 linux-backports-modules-2.6.38-11-generic  N/A
 linux-firmware 1.52.1
RfKill:
 
SourcePackage: linux
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-04-28 (98 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 10/29/2010
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 0901
dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: P7H55-M/USB3
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev X.0x
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0901:bd10/29/2010:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnP7H55-M/USB3:rvrRevX.0x:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion:
dmi.product.name: System Product Name
dmi.product.version: System Version
dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer

** Affects: linux-meta (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug natty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821454

Title:
  r8169 hangs after many link up

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/821454/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 821454] Re: r8169 hangs after many link up

2011-08-05 Thread Digulla-hepe
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821454

Title:
  r8169 hangs after many link up

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/821454/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 821454] Re: r8169 hangs after many link up

2011-08-05 Thread Digulla-hepe
I had the issue with kernel vmlinuz-2.6.38-10-generic. I tried with
vmlinuz-2.6.38-11-generic but it has the same flaw.

Is there a newer version of r8169 which I can/should try?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/821454

Title:
  r8169 hangs after many link up

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-meta/+bug/821454/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 783155] [NEW] Natty: Loader chooses 64-bit instead of 32-bit library

2011-05-15 Thread Digulla-hepe
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: ia32-libs

The bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs/+bug/641056
is back with Natty.

Since there was no reaction on the comments on the old bug, I've opened
a new one.

** Affects: ia32-libs (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/783155

Title:
  Natty: Loader chooses 64-bit instead of 32-bit library

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 641056] Re: Loader chooses 64-bit instead of 32-bit library

2011-05-15 Thread Digulla-hepe
Since there was no response to the comment here, I've opened a new bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ia32-libs/+bug/783155

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641056

Title:
  Loader chooses 64-bit instead of 32-bit library

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 641056] Re: Loader chooses 64-bit instead of 32-bit library

2011-05-05 Thread Digulla-hepe
Since the update to Natty, I get the same errors for Firefox 4.0.1:

Gtk-WARNING **: Error loading icon: Unable to load image-loading module:
/usr/lib/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so: /usr/lib
/gdk-pixbuf-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so: wrong ELF class:
ELFCLASS64

Is there a workaround? Something to force GTK to load the 32bit library
on my 64bit Ubuntu? I have ia32-libs installed.

PS: You may want to check with OpenSUSE how they handle 32/64bit
libraries. I've been using a 64bit system for roughly five years and ran
all kinds of software on that and I never had even a single problem with
32/64bit (ok, sometimes I had to install the 32bit version of a library
... but after that, everything just worked). On Ubuntu, 32bit support on
64bit systems feels much more brittle.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641056

Title:
  Loader chooses 64-bit instead of 32-bit library

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 639933] Re: 10.04 - 10.10beta: could not install the upgrades

2010-10-07 Thread Digulla-hepe
Same problem here.

** Attachment added: Log files from /var/log/dist-upgrade
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/639933/+attachment/1676580/+files/upgrade-10.10-failed.tgz

-- 
10.04 - 10.10beta: could not install the upgrades
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/639933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 639933] Re: 10.04 - 10.10beta: could not install the upgrades

2010-10-07 Thread Digulla-hepe
I have a more simple workaround:

dpkg --force-depends --remove x11-xkb-utils

This just deletes the package with the cycle. After that, the upgrader
starts installing the upgrades.

-- 
10.04 - 10.10beta: could not install the upgrades
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/639933
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs