[Bug 500069] Re: USB file transfer causes system freezes; ops take hours instead of minutes

2012-12-23 Thread Dmole
@Matthew
I appreciate your frustration but try to understand the people who can fix this 
problem are unable to reproduce it, and the people who have the problem are 
unable to so much as report on it properly.

If you truly want this fixed please take the time to learn how to report a bug 
properly.
At 95 comments clearly there is A problem but without a stack trace, log, or 
conclusive benchmarking it's unlikely to be addressed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500069

Title:
  USB file transfer causes system freezes; ops take hours instead of
  minutes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/500069/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: Messages not being sent to system logs

2012-10-26 Thread Dmole
root@ms:~# tail -n 1 /var/log/messages
Oct 26 06:25:01 atlantic1 rsyslogd: [origin software=rsyslogd 
swVersion=4.6.4 x-pid=855 x-info=http://www.rsyslog.com;] rsyslogd was 
HUPed, type 'lightweight'.

root@ms:~# uname -a
Linux ms 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 SMP Sun May 6 04:00:17 UTC 2012 x86_64 GNU/Linux

root@ms:~# cat /etc/issue
Debian GNU/Linux 6.0 \n \l

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862

Title:
  Messages not being sent to system logs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/rsyslog/+bug/407862/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 407862] Re: Messages not being sent to system logs

2012-10-26 Thread Dmole
logging is sent to /var/log/syslog not /var/log/messages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407862

Title:
  Messages not being sent to system logs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/rsyslog/+bug/407862/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 500069] Re: USB file transfer causes system freezes; ops take hours instead of minutes

2012-10-01 Thread Dmole
simplexion (simplexion) 
Torsten Bronger (bronger)

If you'r not going to read the history and figure out how to
provide the results of a disk benchmarking tool on the exact same hardware from 
both an effected and unaffected, fully upgraded OS, then
please don't post.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500069

Title:
  USB file transfer causes system freezes; ops take hours instead of
  minutes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/500069/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 500069] Re: USB file transfer causes system freezes; ops take hours instead of minutes

2012-07-26 Thread Dmole
Alain-OIivier Breysse: read the previous posts; provide proof.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500069

Title:
  USB file transfer causes system freezes; ops take hours instead of
  minutes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/500069/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 500069] Re: USB file transfer causes system freezes; ops take hours instead of minutes

2012-04-18 Thread Dmole
At this time:

There are UHS-1 SDHC compatible cards that claim read speeds of 90MB/s
but you need custom hardware to get speeds above normal SDHC.

25MB/s is the max write speed for SDHC.

Class 4 is the max for micro/mini SDHC.

There are some 15MB/s usb sticks
http://usbspeed.nirsoft.net/usb_drive_speed_summary.html?o=11

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500069

Title:
  USB file transfer causes system freezes; ops take hours instead of
  minutes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/500069/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 500069] Re: USB file transfer causes system freezes; ops take hours instead of minutes

2012-04-04 Thread Dmole
philinux and adri58, this bug will never get fixed if you guys don't do
a proper test.

You can't compare the speed of a disk drive to a usb flash stick.

1) You have to use the same disk internaly then over USB, or the same external 
on 2 OSes.
2) You have to provide quantitative numbers using a standard method.

My tests show that there is no problem on the current or the next LTS,
you guys have not run any scientific tests,
and AFAIK this bug report should be closed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500069

Title:
  USB file transfer causes system freezes; ops take hours instead of
  minutes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/500069/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 500069] Re: USB file transfer causes system freezes; ops take hours instead of minutes

2012-04-04 Thread Dmole
@philinux,

You can't buy a 15mb/sec usb stick.
For all we know the slowness you are experiencing could be due to it being 
formatted as NTFS or just a slow flash drive.
3MB/s is the expected speed of a flash drive, anything more then that can 
likely be attributed to compression / caching / delayed write settings.
(That's why the SDHC classes were introduced 
http://www.sakoman.com/OMAP/microsd-card-perfomance-test-results.html)

You said that windows was about 7MB/s and Linux was about 3MB/s
You need to post the results of a disk benchmarking tool on the same drive from 
both OSes.
(I have no recommendations for what windows benchmarking tool to use.)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500069

Title:
  USB file transfer causes system freezes; ops take hours instead of
  minutes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/500069/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 500069] Re: USB file transfer causes system freezes; ops take hours instead of minutes

2012-04-04 Thread Dmole
@philinux, this might work for you though:
http://www.iozone.org/src/current/IozoneSetup.zip

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500069

Title:
  USB file transfer causes system freezes; ops take hours instead of
  minutes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/500069/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 500069] Re: USB file transfer causes system freezes; ops take hours instead of minutes

2012-04-02 Thread Dmole
USB 1 is 001.5 MB/s
USB 2 is 060.0 MB/s
USB 3 is 625.0 MB/s

adri58 is getting 5.3 MB/s, I would bet that is the max speed of his device.
But if not please post the output of a disk speed testing tool from some other 
OS.

Speed tests showing how slow flash drives are:


---
--flash fat32 drive

Darwin imac 11.3.0 Darwin Kernel Version 11.3.0: Thu Jan 12 18:47:41 PST
2012; root:xnu-1699.24.23~1/RELEASE_X86_64 x86_64

writing:
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
10240 bytes transferred in 32.315127 secs (3168795 bytes/sec)

reading:
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
10240 bytes transferred in 3.597781 secs (28461989 bytes/sec)

---
--flash fat32 drive

Linux ubuntu 3.2.0-20-generic-pae #33-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 27 17:05:18 UTC
2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

writing:
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
10240 bytes (102 MB) copied, 47.9621 s, 2.1 MB/s

reading:
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
10240 bytes (102 MB) copied, 3.9149 s, 26.2 MB/s

---
--sata ext4 drive

Linux ubuntu 2.6.32-39-generic #86-Ubuntu SMP Mon Feb 13 21:47:32 UTC
2012 i686 GNU/Linux

writing:
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
10240 bytes (102 MB) copied, 0.759231 s, 135 MB/s

reading:
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
10240 bytes (102 MB) copied, 1.74171 s, 58.8 MB/s


---
--usb ntfs drive

Linux ubuntu 2.6.32-39-generic #86-Ubuntu SMP Mon Feb 13 21:47:32 UTC
2012 i686 GNU/Linux

writing:
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
10240 bytes (102 MB) copied, 3.08867 s, 33.2 MB/s

reading:
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
10240 bytes (102 MB) copied, 3.27496 s, 31.3 MB/s

---
--3 usb lvm dm_crypt ext4 drives (dm_crypt is messing with the write speed here)

Linux ubuntu 2.6.32-39-generic #86-Ubuntu SMP Mon Feb 13 21:47:32 UTC
2012 i686 GNU/Linux

writing:
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
10240 bytes (102 MB) copied, 0.463585 s, 221 MB/s

reading:
1024+0 records in
1024+0 records out
10240 bytes (102 MB) copied, 3.04551 s, 33.6 MB/s


---
--the test used:

#!/bin/bash

#
# test_drive_speed.sh
#

OUT=./file1G.tmp
uname -a
echo spin you right round $OUT;
sleep 1
echo -e \nwriting:
if [ $1 == -u ]; then
dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/shm/$OUT bs=10 count=1024 /dev/null 21
dd if=/dev/shm/$OUT of=$OUT bs=10 count=1024
rm /dev/shm/$OUT;
else
dd if=/dev/zero of=$OUT bs=10 count=1024 
fi
sync
W=$(which purge);
if [ $W ==  ] ; then
sudo echo 3  /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches;
else
purge;
fi
sleep 1
echo -e \nreading:
dd if=$OUT of=/dev/null bs=10 count=1024
rm $OUT;

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500069

Title:
  USB file transfer causes system freezes; ops take hours instead of
  minutes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/500069/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 500069] Re: USB file transfer causes system freezes; ops take hours instead of minutes

2012-04-02 Thread Dmole
Hi Adrian,

You need to run that script as root for it to work
(3,4 GB/s is your RAM speed not your disk speed)
also cd to your USB drive before running it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500069

Title:
  USB file transfer causes system freezes; ops take hours instead of
  minutes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/500069/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 500069] Re: USB file transfer causes system freezes; ops take hours instead of minutes

2012-03-31 Thread Dmole
maybe Ming is trying to say, do this:

1) started a capture using this command:
 cat /sys/kernel/debug/usb/usbmon/1u  /tmp/1u.mon.out

2) connect the external drive

3) copy a file to the external drive

4) kill the capture with CTRL-C

5) zip and add attach 1u.mon.out.zip here.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/500069

Title:
  USB file transfer causes system freezes; ops take hours instead of
  minutes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/500069/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 964872] Re: missing menu bar

2012-03-28 Thread Dmole
This is a dual monitor problem.
It  can cause unity to die (even the mouse disappears) but the [Ctrl]+[F1] 
still works
changing the monitors available can cause all 3 problems:
1) menu bar is drawn to a disabled monitor not the primary monitor 
2) all windows get a max width or height of 20px
3) unity crashes

** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964872

Title:
  missing menu bar

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/964872/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 964872] Re: missing menu bar

2012-03-27 Thread Dmole
I did a fresh install and the menu is still missing.
I tested in virtualbox and it works.
so I think this related to some a driver issue or maybe the dual monitor setup?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964872

Title:
  missing menu bar

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/964872/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 940093] Re: '/usr/share/app-install/desktop/kde-telepathy-send-file:kde4__ktp-send-file.desktop' could not be read correctly

2012-03-26 Thread Dmole
Deleting the file seems to solve the issue~ don't know if that breaks
anything though

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/940093

Title:
  '/usr/share/app-install/desktop/kde-telepathy-send-file:kde4__ktp-
  send-file.desktop' could not be read correctly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ktp-send-file/+bug/940093/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 964872] [NEW] missing menu bar

2012-03-25 Thread Dmole
Public bug reported:

I upgraded my 12.04 install today and after a reboot the unity menu bar went 
missing.
(or if auto hide is off all windows act like max-height:20px;)
pressing the windows/mac button on the keyboard brings up the search but still 
no menu bar.

** Affects: unity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964872

Title:
  missing menu bar

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/964872/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 953555] [NEW] hdparm fails on usb drives

2012-03-12 Thread Dmole
Public bug reported:

I used to have a script ask my external drives to spin down less often, but 
after a recent upgrade the script fails.
hdparm -S 241 /dev/sde;

/dev/sde:
 setting standby to 241 (30 minutes)
 HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(setidle) failed: Invalid exchange
I tried identify but it also faild
HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(identify) failed: Invalid exchange

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases seems to be out of date but the EOL should not 
be until April 2015
nothing in dmesg

1) lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.04.4 LTS
Release:10.04

2) apt-cache policy hdparm
hdparm:
  Installed: 9.15-1ubuntu9
  Candidate: 9.15-1ubuntu9
  Version table:
 *** 9.15-1ubuntu9 0
500 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
3) What you expected to happen: (succsess)
hdparm /dev/sdb

/dev/sdb:
 multcount =  8 (on)
 IO_support=  0 (default) 
 readonly  =  0 (off)
 readahead = 256 (on)
 geometry  = 38913/255/63, sectors = 625142448, start = 0
4) What happened instead: (failure)
hdparm /dev/sde

/dev/sde:
 HDIO_DRIVE_CMD(identify) failed: Invalid exchange
 readonly  =  0 (off)
 readahead = 256 (on)
 geometry  = 243201/255/63, sectors = 3907029168, start = 0

** Affects: hdparm (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953555

Title:
  hdparm fails on usb drives

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hdparm/+bug/953555/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 953555] Re: hdparm fails on usb drives

2012-03-12 Thread Dmole
** Attachment added: apport.hdparm.obtIQo.apport
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953555/+attachment/2859547/+files/apport.hdparm.obtIQo.apport

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/953555

Title:
  hdparm fails on usb drives

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hdparm/+bug/953555/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 939450] Re: ubiquity crashed with TypeError: argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable in ubi-partman.py

2012-03-06 Thread Dmole
Thanks jibel :)

linking to mis linked bug (testing):
#912031
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/912031
a 
href=https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/912031;link_01/a
a href=/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/912031link_02/a

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/939450

Title:
  ubiquity crashed with TypeError: argument of type 'NoneType' is not
  iterable in ubi-partman.py

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/939450/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 912031] Re: ubiquity crashed with TypeError in partman_column_name(): argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable

2012-02-29 Thread Dmole
Well hey at least the browser is opening now. But it's still FAIL.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912031

Title:
  ubiquity crashed with TypeError in partman_column_name(): argument of
  type 'NoneType' is not iterable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/912031/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 912031] Re: ubiquity crashed with TypeError in partman_column_name(): argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable

2012-02-28 Thread Dmole
yes most people here are likely experiencing bug 939450 or some other
number, but this is where Ubuntu sends us so this is where it should be
tracked (until the crash reporter is made to send people to a different
page)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912031

Title:
  ubiquity crashed with TypeError in partman_column_name(): argument of
  type 'NoneType' is not iterable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/912031/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 912031] Re: ubiquity crashed with TypeError in partman_column_name(): argument of type 'NoneType' is not iterable

2012-02-23 Thread Dmole
Hard to test when you cant install.
I was directed here after loading a daily build into VirtualBox and selecting 
(download updates+install non-free), then clicking partition(or whatever the 
other option is) on the installer.
a bunch of other crashes happen right after ending in #938128.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/912031

Title:
  ubiquity crashed with TypeError in partman_column_name(): argument of
  type 'NoneType' is not iterable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/912031/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 34813] Re: gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs

2011-10-18 Thread Dmole
well said Crates, 
I also opted to use a different editor (vim) as a solution a long long time ago.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34813

Title:
  gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gedit/+bug/34813/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 875733] Re: disk cache is slow on average with dm-crypt

2011-10-17 Thread Dmole
apport information

** Tags added: apport-collected

** Description changed:

  I would expect the cached read speeds to be the same as the cache is above 
the encryption  device mapper layer.
  Using dm-crypt read speeds are inconsistent averaging 380 MB/s, not using  
dm-crypt read speeds are consistently 1200 MB/s.
  I used dd to test at least 12 times:
  dd if=./test.file of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1024
  
  lsb_release -rd:
  Description:  Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS
  Release:  10.04
  
  apt-cache policy cryptsetup:
  cryptsetup:
Installed: 2:1.1.0~rc2-1ubuntu13
Candidate: 2:1.1.0~rc2-1ubuntu13
Version table:
   *** 2:1.1.0~rc2-1ubuntu13 0
  500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
+ --- 
+ AlsaVersion: Advanced Linux Sound Architecture Driver Version 1.0.21.
+ AplayDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
+ Architecture: i386
+ ArecordDevices: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
+ AudioDevicesInUse: Error: command ['fuser', '-v', '/dev/snd/by-path', 
'/dev/snd/controlC0', '/dev/snd/hwC0D2', '/dev/snd/pcmC0D0c', 
'/dev/snd/pcmC0D0p', '/dev/snd/timer'] failed with exit code 1:
+ CRDA: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
+ Card0.Amixer.info: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
+ Card0.Amixer.values: Error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory
+ DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
+ HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=bedd48c0-3471-4c24-931d-ce224b3f746c
+ MachineType: Dell Inc. Dell DV051
+ Package: linux (not installed)
+ ProcCmdLine: root=UUID=bae54c1d-5f65-4a70-bff5-e9200e4ab461 ro quiet splash
+ ProcEnviron:
+  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
+ ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-33.72-generic-pae 2.6.32.41+drm33.18
+ Regression: No
+ RelatedPackageVersions: linux-firmware 1.34.7
+ Reproducible: Yes
+ RfKill:
+  
+ Tags: lucid filesystem needs-upstream-testing
+ Uname: Linux 2.6.32-33-generic-pae i686
+ UserGroups:
+  
+ WifiSyslog:
+  
+ dmi.bios.date: 10/08/2005
+ dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
+ dmi.bios.version: A03
+ dmi.board.name: 0JC474
+ dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
+ dmi.chassis.type: 6
+ dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
+ dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA03:bd10/08/2005:svnDellInc.:pnDellDV051:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0JC474:rvr:cvnDellInc.:ct6:cvr:
+ dmi.product.name: Dell DV051
+ dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.

** Attachment added: AlsaDevices.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/875733/+attachment/2553604/+files/AlsaDevices.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875733

Title:
  disk cache is slow on average with dm-crypt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875733/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 875733] BootDmesg.txt

2011-10-17 Thread Dmole
apport information

** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/875733/+attachment/2553605/+files/BootDmesg.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875733

Title:
  disk cache is slow on average with dm-crypt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875733/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 875733] Card0.Codecs.codec.2.txt

2011-10-17 Thread Dmole
apport information

** Attachment added: Card0.Codecs.codec.2.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/875733/+attachment/2553606/+files/Card0.Codecs.codec.2.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875733

Title:
  disk cache is slow on average with dm-crypt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875733/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 875733] CurrentDmesg.txt

2011-10-17 Thread Dmole
apport information

** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/875733/+attachment/2553607/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875733

Title:
  disk cache is slow on average with dm-crypt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875733/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 875733] IwConfig.txt

2011-10-17 Thread Dmole
apport information

** Attachment added: IwConfig.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/875733/+attachment/2553608/+files/IwConfig.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875733

Title:
  disk cache is slow on average with dm-crypt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875733/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 875733] Lspci.txt

2011-10-17 Thread Dmole
apport information

** Attachment added: Lspci.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/875733/+attachment/2553609/+files/Lspci.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875733

Title:
  disk cache is slow on average with dm-crypt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875733/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 875733] Lsusb.txt

2011-10-17 Thread Dmole
apport information

** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/875733/+attachment/2553610/+files/Lsusb.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875733

Title:
  disk cache is slow on average with dm-crypt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875733/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 875733] PciMultimedia.txt

2011-10-17 Thread Dmole
apport information

** Attachment added: PciMultimedia.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/875733/+attachment/2553611/+files/PciMultimedia.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875733

Title:
  disk cache is slow on average with dm-crypt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875733/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 875733] ProcCpuinfo.txt

2011-10-17 Thread Dmole
apport information

** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/875733/+attachment/2553612/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875733

Title:
  disk cache is slow on average with dm-crypt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875733/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 875733] ProcModules.txt

2011-10-17 Thread Dmole
apport information

** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/875733/+attachment/2553614/+files/ProcModules.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875733

Title:
  disk cache is slow on average with dm-crypt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875733/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 875733] ProcInterrupts.txt

2011-10-17 Thread Dmole
apport information

** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/875733/+attachment/2553613/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875733

Title:
  disk cache is slow on average with dm-crypt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875733/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 875733] UdevLog.txt

2011-10-17 Thread Dmole
apport information

** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/875733/+attachment/2553616/+files/UdevLog.txt

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875733

Title:
  disk cache is slow on average with dm-crypt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875733/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 875733] UdevDb.txt

2011-10-17 Thread Dmole
apport information

** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt
   
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/bugs/875733/+attachment/2553615/+files/UdevDb.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875733

Title:
  disk cache is slow on average with dm-crypt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875733/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 875733] [NEW] disk cache is slow on average with dm-crypt

2011-10-16 Thread Dmole
Public bug reported:

I would expect the cached read speeds to be the same as the cache is above the 
encryption  device mapper layer.
Using dm-crypt read speeds are inconsistent averaging 380 MB/s, not using  
dm-crypt read speeds are consistently 1200 MB/s.
I used dd to test at least 12 times:
dd if=./test.file of=/dev/null bs=1M count=1024

lsb_release -rd:
Description:Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS
Release:10.04

apt-cache policy cryptsetup:
cryptsetup:
  Installed: 2:1.1.0~rc2-1ubuntu13
  Candidate: 2:1.1.0~rc2-1ubuntu13
  Version table:
 *** 2:1.1.0~rc2-1ubuntu13 0
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ lucid/main Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

** Affects: cryptsetup (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875733

Title:
  disk cache is slow on average with dm-crypt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cryptsetup/+bug/875733/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 875733] Re: disk cache is slow on average with dm-crypt

2011-10-16 Thread Dmole
kernel:
2.6.32-33-generic-pae #72-Ubuntu SMP Fri Jul 29 22:06:29 UTC 2011 i686 GNU/Linux
not sure how to get the version for whatever driver it's using.

options passed to cryptsetup:
cryptsetup -c aes-xts-plain -s 512 luksFormat /dev/volumegroup1/logicalvolume1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/875733

Title:
  disk cache is slow on average with dm-crypt

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/875733/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 403381] Re: jaunty-karmic server upgrade results in two versions of postgresql installed

2011-05-08 Thread Dmole
On the missing 8.3 install instructions:
(untested for now)

DUMP=/my/dump/path
MYDB=preciousdata 
pg_ctlcluster 8.4 main stop
pg_dropcluster 8.4 main
echo -e \ndeb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu hardy-security main 
restricted\ndeb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu hardy-security main 
restricted\n/etc/apt/sources.list
apt-get update
apt-get install -y postgresql-8.3
#not needed
#pg_ctlcluster 8.3 main start
# extra backup
cp -r /var/lib/postgresql/8.3/main $DUMP/copy
su postgres -c pg_dumpall -f $DUMP/$MYDB.dump -l $MYDB -U postgres
pg_upgradecluster -v 8.4 8.3 main
pg_ctlcluster 8.3 main stop
pg_dropcluster 8.3 main
pg_ctlcluster 8.4 main start
apt-get remove -y postgresql-8.3


Thanks to Flannel on irc://chat.freenode.net/#ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to bacula in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403381

Title:
  jaunty-karmic server upgrade results in two versions of postgresql
  installed

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 403381] Re: jaunty-karmic server upgrade results in two versions of postgresql installed

2011-05-08 Thread Dmole
On the missing 8.3 install instructions:
(untested for now)

DUMP=/my/dump/path
MYDB=preciousdata 
pg_ctlcluster 8.4 main stop
pg_dropcluster 8.4 main
echo -e \ndeb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu hardy-security main 
restricted\ndeb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu hardy-security main 
restricted\n/etc/apt/sources.list
apt-get update
apt-get install -y postgresql-8.3
#not needed
#pg_ctlcluster 8.3 main start
# extra backup
cp -r /var/lib/postgresql/8.3/main $DUMP/copy
su postgres -c pg_dumpall -f $DUMP/$MYDB.dump -l $MYDB -U postgres
pg_upgradecluster -v 8.4 8.3 main
pg_ctlcluster 8.3 main stop
pg_dropcluster 8.3 main
pg_ctlcluster 8.4 main start
apt-get remove -y postgresql-8.3


Thanks to Flannel on irc://chat.freenode.net/#ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403381

Title:
  jaunty-karmic server upgrade results in two versions of postgresql
  installed

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 371289] Re: fail to delete directory over sshfs with nautilus

2011-01-03 Thread Dmole
Eric Carvalho, glad it's working for you.
Reading the comments makes me think it will not work for you if you try it on 
anything but the main file system of your server when you mount the main file 
system with sshfs.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371289

Title:
  fail to delete directory over sshfs with nautilus

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 482275] Re: kernal panic at 96% (ubuntu installer 9.10 server i386)

2010-08-12 Thread Dmole
Closing this bug should be OK assuming Ubuntu is making no attempt to run on
old hardware, which seems about right considering the RAM requirements.

I got Damn Small Linux to run on it instead.(used v3.4.12 for SCSI support)
.

On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Jeremy Foshee
482...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote:

 This bug report was marked as Incomplete and has not had any updated
 comments for quite some time.  As a result this bug is being closed.
 Please reopen if this is still an issue in the current Ubuntu
 development release http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/current/ .
 Also, please be sure to provide any requested information that may have
 been missing.  To reopen the bug, click on the current status under the
 Status column and change the status back to New.  Thanks.

 [This is an automated message.  Apologies if it has reached you
 inappropriately; please just reply to this message indicating so.]


 ** Tags added: kj-expired

 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete = Expired

 --
 kernal panic at 96% (ubuntu installer 9.10 server i386)
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482275
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: Expired

 Bug description:
 kernal panic at 96% (ubuntu installer 9.10 server i386)
 while detecting network cards.

 Currently mandrake is running on the system.

 lspci
 00:00.0 Host bridge: Broadcom CMIC-LE Host Bridge (GC-LE chipset) (rev 32)
 00:00.1 Host bridge: Broadcom CMIC-LE Host Bridge (GC-LE chipset)
 00:00.2 Host bridge: Broadcom CMIC-LE Host Bridge (GC-LE chipset)
 00:0e.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL (rev 27)
 00:0f.0 Host bridge: Broadcom CSB5 South Bridge (rev 93)
 00:0f.1 IDE interface: Broadcom CSB5 IDE Controller (rev 93)
 00:0f.2 USB Controller: Broadcom OSB4/CSB5 OHCI USB Controller (rev 05)
 00:0f.3 ISA bridge: Broadcom CSB5 LPC bridge
 00:10.0 Host bridge: Broadcom CIOB-E I/O Bridge with Gigabit Ethernet (rev
 12)
 00:10.2 Host bridge: Broadcom CIOB-E I/O Bridge with Gigabit Ethernet (rev
 12)
 00:11.0 Host bridge: Broadcom CIOB-X2 PCI-X I/O Bridge (rev 05)
 00:11.2 Host bridge: Broadcom CIOB-X2 PCI-X I/O Bridge (rev 05)
 01:04.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905C-TX/TX-M [Tornado] (rev
 78)
 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5704 Gigabit
 Ethernet (rev 02)
 02:00.1 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5704 Gigabit
 Ethernet (rev 02)
 04:05.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X
 Fusion-MPT Dual Ultra320 SCSI (rev 07)
 04:05.1 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X
 Fusion-MPT Dual Ultra320 SCSI (rev 07)


 lshw and hwinfo are not on this system, so I'm not sure what else to say.
 please contact me if there is anything I can do.

 To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/482275/+subscribe


-- 
kernal panic at 96% (ubuntu installer 9.10 server i386)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 280657] Re: Intrepid kernel 2.6.27-6 no supported image sensor dected for SN9C105 (045e, 00f7)

2010-07-11 Thread Dmole
I've completely given up on linux and web cam's they don't work and when
they do thy don't work properly.

On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 3:26 PM, kyleabaker
280...@bugs.launchpad.netwrote:

  David Robert Lewis: This driver in Lucid generally works except for
 Skype.

 Are you using the Microsoft LifeCam VX-1000 in Ubuntu Lucid 32-bit or
 64-bit? I was unable to get the microphone to work in Lucid 64-bit. Now
 that I'm testing Ubuntu 10.10 64-bit, the microphone works on its own
 until the video capture is started, in which case the microphone no
 longer works for that session.

 Has anyone successfully gotten the microphone to work while capturing
 video with this driver and a 64-bit platform? Hardy seems to be the last
 point that this web cam was properly working.

 Discussion for fixing this webcam/driver with latest release:
 http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1516541

 --
 Intrepid kernel 2.6.27-6 no supported image sensor dected for SN9C105
 (045e, 00f7)
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280657
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in The Linux Kernel: Fix Released
 Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: In Progress

 Bug description:
 Image sensor not detected for Microsoft VX1000 web cam in kernel 2.6.27-6
 kernel, worked previously in 2.6.26 kernels. This may be an upstream issue
 as I tried Suse 11.1 beta with 2.6.27 kernel and had same issue.

 This is what should be detected the image sensor being OV7760.

 ( {USB_DEVICE(0x045e, 0x00f7), BSI(SN9C105, OV7660, 0x21)})

 My results can be found below:

 dmesg - result:
 [  318.096282] usb 6-1: new full speed USB device using uhci_hcd and
 address 4
 [  318.254802] usb 6-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
 [  318.259737] usb 6-1: SN9C105 PC Camera Controller detected (vid:pid
 0x045E:0x00F7)
 [  318.382372] usb 6-1: No supported image sensor detected for this bridge

 st...@dell:~$ lsmod | grep video
 video  25104  0
 output 11008  1 video
 videodev   41344  1 sn9c102
 v4l1_compat22404  1 videodev

 st...@dell:~$ lsusb
 Bus 006 Device 004: ID 045e:00f7 Microsoft Corp. LifeCam VX-1000.
 Bus 006 Device 003: ID 03f0:1411 Hewlett-Packard PSC 750
 Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 007 Device 002: ID 0644:0200 TEAC Corp.
 Bus 007 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
 Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 001 Device 004: ID 413c:2003 Dell Computer Corp. Keyboard
 Bus 001 Device 003: ID 046d:c016 Logitech, Inc. M-UV69a/HP M-UV96 Optical
 WheelMouse
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub

 More info
 -
 Mode probe shows that sn9c105, which is required for this webcam is not
 found

 st...@dell:~$ modprobe -v sn9c105
 FATAL: Module sn9c105 not found.



 To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/280657/+subscribe


-- 
Intrepid kernel 2.6.27-6 no supported image sensor dected for SN9C105 (045e, 
00f7)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/280657
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 482275] Re: kernal panic at 96% (ubuntu installer 9.10 server i386)

2010-04-24 Thread Dmole
Maybe I was unclear because there Is no way for me to run an ubuntu command
without being able to install ubuntu. Ubuntu will not install or boot on
this box.  I will try 10.04 and I will try to find and use a driver CD as I
suspect that might be the issue.

On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Jeremy Foshee
jeremy.fos...@canonical.comwrote:

 Hi Dmole,

 This bug was reported a while ago and there hasn't been any activity in it
 recently. We were wondering if this is still an issue? Can you try with the
 latest development release of Ubuntu?  ISO CD images are available from
 http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/releases/ .

 If it remains an issue, could you run the following command from a Terminal
 (Applications-Accessories-Terminal).  It will automatically gather and
 attach updated debug information to this report.

 apport-collect -p linux 482275

 Also, if you could test the latest upstream kernel available that would be
 great.  It will allow additional upstream developers to examine the issue.
  Refer to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelMainlineBuilds .  Once you've
 tested the upstream kernel, please remove the 'needs-upstream-testing' tag.
  This can be done by clicking on the yellow pencil icon next to the tag
 located at the bottom of the bug description and deleting the
 'needs-upstream-testing' text.  Please let us know your results.

 Thanks in advance.

[This is an automated message.  Apologies if it has reached you
 inappropriately; please just reply to this message indicating so.]


 ** Tags added: needs-kernel-logs

 ** Tags added: needs-upstream-testing

 ** Tags added: kj-triage

 ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Incomplete

 --
 kernal panic at 96% (ubuntu installer 9.10 server i386)
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482275
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in “linux” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete

 Bug description:
 kernal panic at 96% (ubuntu installer 9.10 server i386)
 while detecting network cards.

 Currently mandrake is running on the system.

 lspci
 00:00.0 Host bridge: Broadcom CMIC-LE Host Bridge (GC-LE chipset) (rev 32)
 00:00.1 Host bridge: Broadcom CMIC-LE Host Bridge (GC-LE chipset)
 00:00.2 Host bridge: Broadcom CMIC-LE Host Bridge (GC-LE chipset)
 00:0e.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL (rev 27)
 00:0f.0 Host bridge: Broadcom CSB5 South Bridge (rev 93)
 00:0f.1 IDE interface: Broadcom CSB5 IDE Controller (rev 93)
 00:0f.2 USB Controller: Broadcom OSB4/CSB5 OHCI USB Controller (rev 05)
 00:0f.3 ISA bridge: Broadcom CSB5 LPC bridge
 00:10.0 Host bridge: Broadcom CIOB-E I/O Bridge with Gigabit Ethernet (rev
 12)
 00:10.2 Host bridge: Broadcom CIOB-E I/O Bridge with Gigabit Ethernet (rev
 12)
 00:11.0 Host bridge: Broadcom CIOB-X2 PCI-X I/O Bridge (rev 05)
 00:11.2 Host bridge: Broadcom CIOB-X2 PCI-X I/O Bridge (rev 05)
 01:04.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905C-TX/TX-M [Tornado] (rev
 78)
 02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5704 Gigabit
 Ethernet (rev 02)
 02:00.1 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5704 Gigabit
 Ethernet (rev 02)
 04:05.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X
 Fusion-MPT Dual Ultra320 SCSI (rev 07)
 04:05.1 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X
 Fusion-MPT Dual Ultra320 SCSI (rev 07)


 lshw and hwinfo are not on this system, so I'm not sure what else to say.
 please contact me if there is anything I can do.

 To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/482275/+subscribe


-- 
kernal panic at 96% (ubuntu installer 9.10 server i386)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 566380] [NEW] unable to format partition

2010-04-18 Thread Dmole
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gparted

Ubuntu 9.04 and 10.04 fail to format or resize partitions made by Win7.
Error was misleading as partitions were not mounted.
Bug makes Ubuntu look inept-unusable on install/first use.
tested on formatted and blank partitions.
workaround is to deleted the partitions and make new/usable ones with gparted.

** Affects: gparted (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
unable to format partition
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566380
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 566380] Re: unable to format partition

2010-04-18 Thread Dmole

** Attachment added: gparted error
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44753240/gparted_details.htm

-- 
unable to format partition
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566380
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 566380] Re: unable to format partition

2010-04-18 Thread Dmole
Additionally it took three attempts to submit this bug because Launchpad
is acting up again: Timeout and (Error ID: OOPS-1570M340)

-- 
unable to format partition
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566380
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 268536] Re: mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8

2010-03-11 Thread Dmole
Looking back on my original post I did use those options:
mount -t smbfs -o
username=user,password=short-password,dir_mode=0555,file_mode=0555
//ip/share /media/folder

I can't seem to replicate the behavior at the moment (un-commenting old code
dose not have the same effect as before)
I'm assuming it was fixed some time between Aug 20 2008 (v2.6.24-19)  and
Jan 28 2010 (v2.6.28-18).
mount.cifs //ip/share /media/folder -o
file_mode=0555,dir_mode=0555,r,username=user,password=short-password
also works.
thanks for the help anyway, feel free to close the bug.



On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Thierry Carrez
thierry.car...@ubuntu.comwrote:

 Those are documented on mount.cifs manpage:
 http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/lucid/en/man8/mount.cifs.8.html

 --
 mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in “samba” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete

 Bug description:
 objective : mount the same SMB share to 2 folders with different
 permissions.

 history: was working before upgrade to v8. Did not find any solutions on
 the web.

 problems:
   1) mounting the same SMB share the second time changes the dmask on the
 first share.
   2) mounting the same SMB share the second time fails with: folder dose
 not exist.
   3) mount --bind ignores fmask and file_mode / dmask and dir_mode
   4) chmod is able to change permissions on mounts
   5) files are created with wrong permissions   re: fmask

 temporary workarounds: ?

 solutions:?

 origonal example:   http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=911549

 cat /proc/version
 Linux version 2.6.24-19-generic (bui...@terranova) (gcc version 4.2.3
 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)) #1 SMP Wed Aug 20 22:56:21 UTC 2008

 To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/268536/+subscribe


-- 
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 268536] Re: mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8

2010-03-11 Thread Dmole
Looking back on my original post I did use those options:
mount -t smbfs -o
username=user,password=short-password,dir_mode=0555,file_mode=0555
//ip/share /media/folder

I can't seem to replicate the behavior at the moment (un-commenting old code
dose not have the same effect as before)
I'm assuming it was fixed some time between Aug 20 2008 (v2.6.24-19)  and
Jan 28 2010 (v2.6.28-18).
mount.cifs //ip/share /media/folder -o
file_mode=0555,dir_mode=0555,r,username=user,password=short-password
also works.
thanks for the help anyway, feel free to close the bug.



On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Thierry Carrez
thierry.car...@ubuntu.comwrote:

 Those are documented on mount.cifs manpage:
 http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/lucid/en/man8/mount.cifs.8.html

 --
 mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in “samba” package in Ubuntu: Incomplete

 Bug description:
 objective : mount the same SMB share to 2 folders with different
 permissions.

 history: was working before upgrade to v8. Did not find any solutions on
 the web.

 problems:
   1) mounting the same SMB share the second time changes the dmask on the
 first share.
   2) mounting the same SMB share the second time fails with: folder dose
 not exist.
   3) mount --bind ignores fmask and file_mode / dmask and dir_mode
   4) chmod is able to change permissions on mounts
   5) files are created with wrong permissions   re: fmask

 temporary workarounds: ?

 solutions:?

 origonal example:   http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=911549

 cat /proc/version
 Linux version 2.6.24-19-generic (bui...@terranova) (gcc version 4.2.3
 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)) #1 SMP Wed Aug 20 22:56:21 UTC 2008

 To unsubscribe from this bug, go to:
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/samba/+bug/268536/+subscribe


-- 
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 268536] Re: mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8

2010-03-10 Thread Dmole
Hi,
By requested information I assume you mean try it with file_mode and
dir_mode.
There is nothing in man mount about that so you will have to be more
specific about what you want me to try.
Thanks.

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Thierry Carrez
thierry.car...@ubuntu.comwrote:

 We'd like to figure out what's causing this bug for you, but we haven't
 heard back from you in a while. Could you please provide the requested
 information? Thanks!



-- 
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 268536] Re: mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8

2010-03-10 Thread Dmole
Hi,
By requested information I assume you mean try it with file_mode and
dir_mode.
There is nothing in man mount about that so you will have to be more
specific about what you want me to try.
Thanks.

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Thierry Carrez
thierry.car...@ubuntu.comwrote:

 We'd like to figure out what's causing this bug for you, but we haven't
 heard back from you in a while. Could you please provide the requested
 information? Thanks!



-- 
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 482275] [NEW] kernal panic at 96% (ubuntu installer 9.10 server i386)

2009-11-13 Thread Dmole
Public bug reported:

kernal panic at 96% (ubuntu installer 9.10 server i386)
while detecting network cards.

Currently mandrake is running on the system.

lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Broadcom CMIC-LE Host Bridge (GC-LE chipset) (rev 32)
00:00.1 Host bridge: Broadcom CMIC-LE Host Bridge (GC-LE chipset)
00:00.2 Host bridge: Broadcom CMIC-LE Host Bridge (GC-LE chipset)
00:0e.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL (rev 27)
00:0f.0 Host bridge: Broadcom CSB5 South Bridge (rev 93)
00:0f.1 IDE interface: Broadcom CSB5 IDE Controller (rev 93)
00:0f.2 USB Controller: Broadcom OSB4/CSB5 OHCI USB Controller (rev 05)
00:0f.3 ISA bridge: Broadcom CSB5 LPC bridge
00:10.0 Host bridge: Broadcom CIOB-E I/O Bridge with Gigabit Ethernet (rev 12)
00:10.2 Host bridge: Broadcom CIOB-E I/O Bridge with Gigabit Ethernet (rev 12)
00:11.0 Host bridge: Broadcom CIOB-X2 PCI-X I/O Bridge (rev 05)
00:11.2 Host bridge: Broadcom CIOB-X2 PCI-X I/O Bridge (rev 05)
01:04.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905C-TX/TX-M [Tornado] (rev 78)
02:00.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5704 Gigabit 
Ethernet (rev 02)
02:00.1 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme BCM5704 Gigabit 
Ethernet (rev 02)
04:05.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X 
Fusion-MPT Dual Ultra320 SCSI (rev 07)
04:05.1 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c1030 PCI-X 
Fusion-MPT Dual Ultra320 SCSI (rev 07)


lshw and hwinfo are not on this system, so I'm not sure what else to say.
please contact me if there is anything I can do.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
kernal panic at 96% (ubuntu installer 9.10 server i386)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/482275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 34813] Re: gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs

2009-11-10 Thread Dmole
Thanks for that I was about to reboot to do just that;
because of this problem I use OS X for my laptop ATM

On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 10:25 PM, acabre acabre@gmail.com wrote:

 I've attached two strace logs in case anybody is interested.

 strace_first.log contains a strace of launching GEdit, opening a file
 over sshfs that had not been opened previously, making a change,
 successfully saving it, making another change, and being unable to save.

 strace_second.log contains a strace of launching GEdit, opening this
 file that had been opened over sshfs before, and getting an error on
 trying to save

 I'm on 9.04. In both tests, the Create a backup copy of files before
 saving as in the Editor preferences was checked. Unchecking this box
 solves this problem for me.

 The file I'm opening is /home/straceuser/stracedir/stracemnt/test.txt ,
 where stracemnt is a sshfs fuse mount.

 I'm sure there are several people here, myself included, who would be
 willing to help troubleshoot this problem, if a dev was interested in
 un-triaging it.

 ** Attachment added: strace.tar.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35512943/strace.tar.gz

 --
 gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34813
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in Light-Weight Text Editor for Gnome: Confirmed
 Status in SambaServer: Invalid
 Status in SSHFS Mounter: Confirmed
 Status in “gedit” package in Ubuntu: Triaged

 Bug description:
 Saving files over a cifs/smbfs server doesnt work.  You can open file, edit
 then save perfectly.  But repeated saves after give you this error:

 The file /home/dhonn/website/arrays.php has been modified since reading
 it.  If you save it, all the external changes could be lost. Save it
 anyway?

 The think is lying to me because I havent made any external changes.

 When I click Save Anyway, i get this error:

 Could not save the file /home/dhonn/website/arrays.php.

 But on the third try it works just fine.

 Here are the error messages, btw there are also GUI glitches too:
 http://dhonn.com/images/gedit-0.jpg
 http://dhonn.com/images/gedit-1.jpg



-- 
gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34813
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 268536] Re: mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8

2009-05-30 Thread Dmole
The only outstanding problem is the permissions show as -rwxrwSrwx when
they should show as -r-xr-Sr-x or -r-xr-xr-x

Thierry Carrez :

cifs is what gave me all the other problems and I think smb is a wrapper
for cfs now?

I don't know how to be more precise then what I already said: cat 
/proc/version
Linux version 2.6.24-24-generic (bui...@rothera) (gcc version 4.2.4 (Ubuntu 
4.2.4-1ubuntu4)) #1 SMP Wed Apr 15 15:54:25 UTC 2009 maybe you could tell me 
how or maybe you missed the first post?

Pedro Villavicencio : here is some DebuggingSamba info for you:

categorie: samba as a client.
Did this use to work properly with a previous release ?:yes.

dpkg-query -W -f='${Package} ${Version} ${Source} ${Status}\n' | grep samba
libpam-smbpass 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7 samba install ok installed
libsmbclient 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7 samba install ok installed
samba 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7  install ok installed
samba-common 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7 samba install ok installed
samba-doc 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7 samba install ok installed
smbclient 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7 samba install ok installed
smbfs 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7 samba install ok installed
swat 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7 samba install ok installed
winbind 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7 samba install ok installed

How is the remote share accessed from the Ubuntu system?
mount -t smbfs -r -o username=user,password=pass //192.168.1.100/MrSan 
/media/san

cat /proc/fs/cifs/DebugData
Display Internal CIFS Data Structures for Debugging
---
CIFS Version 1.52
Active VFS Requests: 0
Servers:
entry for 192.168.1.100 not fully displayed
TCP status: 1
Local Users To Server: 2 SecMode: 0x3 Req On Wire: 0
MIDs:

entry for 192.168.1.100 not fully displayed
TCP status: 1
Local Users To Server: 2 SecMode: 0x3 Req On Wire: 0
MIDs:

Shares:
1) \\192.168.1.100\MrSan Uses: 1 Type: NTFS DevInfo: 0x0 Attributes: 0xb
PathComponentMax: 255 Status: 1 type: 0 
2) \\192.168.1.100\MrSan Uses: 1 Type: NTFS DevInfo: 0x0 Attributes: 0xb
PathComponentMax: 255 Status: 1 type: 0

smbclient -L //192.168.1.100
Password: 
Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.8a-ja-1.1]

Sharename   Type  Comment
-     ---
infoDisk  TeraStation utilities
MrSan   Disk  MrSan
IPC$IPC   IPC Service (MrSan)
ADMIN$  IPC   IPC Service (MrSan)
Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.8a-ja-1.1]

Server   Comment
----
MRSERVER MrServer
MRSANMrSan

WorkgroupMaster
----
WORKGROUPMRSAN

ls -hal /media/san/Audio/Albums/B/The\ Beatles\ -\ The\ White\ Album\ CD1/ | 
head -n 4
total 272M
drwxrwxrwx   1 root root0 2008-07-20 19:58 .
drwxrwxrwx 624 root root0 2009-05-30 13:39 ..
-rwxrwSrwx   1 root root  18M 2008-07-20 12:32 The Beatles - The White Album 
CD1 - 01 - Back In The U S S R.flac

mkdir /media/san/Audio/Albums/B/The\ Beatles\ -\ The\ White\ Album\ CD1/test
mkdir: cannot create directory `/media/san/Audio/Albums/B/The Beatles - The 
White Album CD1/test': Read-only file system

-- 
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 268536] Re: mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8

2009-05-30 Thread Dmole
The only outstanding problem is the permissions show as -rwxrwSrwx when
they should show as -r-xr-Sr-x or -r-xr-xr-x

Thierry Carrez :

cifs is what gave me all the other problems and I think smb is a wrapper
for cfs now?

I don't know how to be more precise then what I already said: cat 
/proc/version
Linux version 2.6.24-24-generic (bui...@rothera) (gcc version 4.2.4 (Ubuntu 
4.2.4-1ubuntu4)) #1 SMP Wed Apr 15 15:54:25 UTC 2009 maybe you could tell me 
how or maybe you missed the first post?

Pedro Villavicencio : here is some DebuggingSamba info for you:

categorie: samba as a client.
Did this use to work properly with a previous release ?:yes.

dpkg-query -W -f='${Package} ${Version} ${Source} ${Status}\n' | grep samba
libpam-smbpass 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7 samba install ok installed
libsmbclient 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7 samba install ok installed
samba 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7  install ok installed
samba-common 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7 samba install ok installed
samba-doc 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7 samba install ok installed
smbclient 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7 samba install ok installed
smbfs 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7 samba install ok installed
swat 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7 samba install ok installed
winbind 3.0.28a-1ubuntu4.7 samba install ok installed

How is the remote share accessed from the Ubuntu system?
mount -t smbfs -r -o username=user,password=pass //192.168.1.100/MrSan 
/media/san

cat /proc/fs/cifs/DebugData
Display Internal CIFS Data Structures for Debugging
---
CIFS Version 1.52
Active VFS Requests: 0
Servers:
entry for 192.168.1.100 not fully displayed
TCP status: 1
Local Users To Server: 2 SecMode: 0x3 Req On Wire: 0
MIDs:

entry for 192.168.1.100 not fully displayed
TCP status: 1
Local Users To Server: 2 SecMode: 0x3 Req On Wire: 0
MIDs:

Shares:
1) \\192.168.1.100\MrSan Uses: 1 Type: NTFS DevInfo: 0x0 Attributes: 0xb
PathComponentMax: 255 Status: 1 type: 0 
2) \\192.168.1.100\MrSan Uses: 1 Type: NTFS DevInfo: 0x0 Attributes: 0xb
PathComponentMax: 255 Status: 1 type: 0

smbclient -L //192.168.1.100
Password: 
Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.8a-ja-1.1]

Sharename   Type  Comment
-     ---
infoDisk  TeraStation utilities
MrSan   Disk  MrSan
IPC$IPC   IPC Service (MrSan)
ADMIN$  IPC   IPC Service (MrSan)
Domain=[WORKGROUP] OS=[Unix] Server=[Samba 2.2.8a-ja-1.1]

Server   Comment
----
MRSERVER MrServer
MRSANMrSan

WorkgroupMaster
----
WORKGROUPMRSAN

ls -hal /media/san/Audio/Albums/B/The\ Beatles\ -\ The\ White\ Album\ CD1/ | 
head -n 4
total 272M
drwxrwxrwx   1 root root0 2008-07-20 19:58 .
drwxrwxrwx 624 root root0 2009-05-30 13:39 ..
-rwxrwSrwx   1 root root  18M 2008-07-20 12:32 The Beatles - The White Album 
CD1 - 01 - Back In The U S S R.flac

mkdir /media/san/Audio/Albums/B/The\ Beatles\ -\ The\ White\ Album\ CD1/test
mkdir: cannot create directory `/media/san/Audio/Albums/B/The Beatles - The 
White Album CD1/test': Read-only file system

-- 
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 34813] Re: gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs

2009-05-30 Thread Dmole
how is this Importance=Low?
It affects anyone who works or plays on servers.
90% of linux users IMO

** Changed in: sshfs-mounter
   Status: New = Confirmed

-- 
gedit fails to save files over smbfs/cifs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/34813
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 276563] Re: gedit cannot save files more than once on sshfs mounted fs

2009-05-03 Thread Dmole
Please mark this as a duplicate.

Invalid  → Duplicate/Confirmed

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+bug/34813

-- 
gedit cannot save files more than once on sshfs mounted fs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/276563
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 371289] [NEW] fail to delete directory over sshfs with nautilus

2009-05-03 Thread Dmole
Public bug reported:

fail to delete non-empty directory over sshfs from nautilus by pressing
the delete key. with Error removing file: Operation not permitted

works if you empty the folder first.

dir is chmod -R 0777 folder

mount command was sshfs m...@myserver:/ /media/myServer

server:
2.6.24-23-generic #1 SMP Wed Apr 1 21:47:28 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
updated (not dist-update) Sun May  3 11:42:32 EDT 2009

client:
2.6.28-11-generic #42-Ubuntu SMP Fri Apr 17 01:57:59 UTC 2009 i686 GNU/Linux
updated Sun May  3 11:42:32 EDT 2009

it's like nautilus is asking for a rm -f file when it should be asking
for a rm -fr file

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
fail to delete directory over sshfs with nautilus
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371289
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 268536] Re: mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8

2009-01-13 Thread Dmole
How is this a samba bug is samba is replaced with cfs?
is anyone working on a fix?

update: currently I have a some mounts functioning but only for root and
with completely misleading permissions.

On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 7:17 PM, Andres Mujica
andres.muj...@seaq.com.cowrote:

 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
 better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which is
 important for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper developers. You
 can learn more about finding the right package at
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/FindRightPackage . I have classified this bug
 as a bug in SAMBA.
 For future reference you might be interested to know that a lot of
 applications have bug reporting functionality built in to them. This can be
 accessed via the Report a Problem option in the Help menu for the
 application with which you are having an issue. You can learn more about
 this feature at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ReportingBugs.

 ** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
 Sourcepackagename: None = samba

 --
 mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in samba source package in Ubuntu: New

 Bug description:
 objective : mount the same SMB share to 2 folders with different
 permissions.

 history: was working before upgrade to v8. Did not find any solutions on
 the web.

 problems:
   1) mounting the same SMB share the second time changes the dmask on the
 first share.
   2) mounting the same SMB share the second time fails with: folder dose
 not exist.
   3) mount --bind ignores fmask and file_mode / dmask and dir_mode
   4) chmod is able to change permissions on mounts
   5) files are created with wrong permissions   re: fmask

 temporary workarounds: ?

 solutions:?

 origonal example:   http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=911549

 cat /proc/version
 Linux version 2.6.24-19-generic (bui...@terranova) (gcc version 4.2.3
 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)) #1 SMP Wed Aug 20 22:56:21 UTC 2008


-- 
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 302960] Re: Nokia 5310 usb mass-storage hangs

2009-01-01 Thread Dmole
this bug is not limited to Nokea I have a usb mass-storage 80G maxtor and it 
only works on the LTS not the latest release. 
this is not a hardware problem at it works on the same box with a different OS 
and also on other box's
please email me if more testing is needed.


working:
box1(8.04):
uname -a
#Linux 2.6.24-22-generic #1 SMP Mon Nov 24 18:32:42 UTC 2008 i686 
GNU/Linux
box2(7.10):
uname -a
#Linux 2.6.22-14-generic #1 SMP Tue Feb 12 07:42:25 UTC 2008 i686 
GNU/Linux

busted:
box2(8.10):
uname -a
#Linux 2.6.27-11-generic #1 SMP Fri Dec 19 16:29:52 UTC 2008 i686 
GNU/Linux
dmesg | tail
#[ 283.992302] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Sense Key : No Sense [current]
#[ 283.992311] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Add. Sense: No additional sense 
information
same in /var/log/syslog at about 10 lines per second over and over again

-- 
Nokia 5310 usb mass-storage hangs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302960
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 268536] Re: mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8

2008-10-23 Thread Dmole
I guess the thing is that smbfs is no longer used cifs is used transparently
instead.
exept it's not transparent at all so all of my old scripts broke disabling
my server.
the original post has all the information I think you might need, but if you
need any specific answers please ask.
I did find 1/2 of a work around but the behaviour is still different.


to reproduce:
1)install ubuntu 6.x
2)have a NAS or some separate SBM share
3)set up a a bash script to mount the share


 -o username=user,password=long-password,fmask=0555,dmask=0555,gid=1000
//ip/share /media/folder

4) upgrade to 8.x
5) it won't work anymore
6) the best fix I can find dose not preserve the original behaviour


please email me any help you can offer


On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 1:57 PM, IanW [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
 Ubuntu better. Please answer these questions:

 * Is this reproducible?
 * If so, what specific steps should we take to recreate this bug?

 This will help us to find and resolve the problem.

 ** Changed in: gvfs (Ubuntu)
 Sourcepackagename: None = gvfs
   Status: New = Incomplete

 --
 mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in gvfs source package in Ubuntu: Incomplete

 Bug description:
 objective : mount the same SMB share to 2 folders with different
 permissions.

 history: was working before upgrade to v8. Did not find any solutions on
 the web.

 problems:
   1) mounting the same SMB share the second time changes the dmask on the
 first share.
   2) mounting the same SMB share the second time fails with: folder dose
 not exist.
   3) mount --bind ignores fmask and file_mode / dmask and dir_mode
   4) chmod is able to change permissions on mounts
   5) files are created with wrong permissions   re: fmask

 temporary workarounds: ?

 solutions:?

 origonal example:   http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=911549

 cat /proc/version
 Linux version 2.6.24-19-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.2.3
 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)) #1 SMP Wed Aug 20 22:56:21 UTC 2008


-- 
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 268536] Re: mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8

2008-10-23 Thread Dmole
who maked it as gvfs?
and why is it not gvfs related?

On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 5:10 PM, Sebastien Bacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 the command line mounting is not a gvfs thing

 ** Changed in: ubuntu
 Sourcepackagename: gvfs = None
   Status: Incomplete = New

 --
 mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.

 Status in Ubuntu: New

 Bug description:
 objective : mount the same SMB share to 2 folders with different
 permissions.

 history: was working before upgrade to v8. Did not find any solutions on
 the web.

 problems:
   1) mounting the same SMB share the second time changes the dmask on the
 first share.
   2) mounting the same SMB share the second time fails with: folder dose
 not exist.
   3) mount --bind ignores fmask and file_mode / dmask and dir_mode
   4) chmod is able to change permissions on mounts
   5) files are created with wrong permissions   re: fmask

 temporary workarounds: ?

 solutions:?

 origonal example:   http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=911549

 cat /proc/version
 Linux version 2.6.24-19-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.2.3
 (Ubuntu 4.2.3-2ubuntu7)) #1 SMP Wed Aug 20 22:56:21 UTC 2008


-- 
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 268536] [NEW] mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8

2008-09-10 Thread Dmole
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***

Public security bug reported:

objective : mount the same SMB share to 2 folders with different
permissions.

history: was working before upgrade to v8. Did not find any solutions on
the web.

problems:
   1) mounting the same SMB share the second time changes the dmask on the 
first share.
   2) mounting the same SMB share the second time fails with: folder dose not 
exist.
   3) mount --bind ignores fmask and file_mode / dmask and dir_mode
   4) chmod is able to change permissions on mounts 
   5) files are created with wrong permissions   re: fmask 

temporary workarounds: ?

solutions:?

origonal example:   http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=911549

cat /proc/version
Linux version 2.6.24-19-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.2.3 (Ubuntu 
4.2.3-2ubuntu7)) #1 SMP Wed Aug 20 22:56:21 UTC 2008

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
mount smbfs not working properly after upgrade from 6 to 8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268536
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs