[Bug 951533] [NEW] libjinput-jni: contains undefined symbol EVIOCGUSAGE
Public bug reported: In the current state, the package is totally broken! This was originally reported in Debian as http://bugs.debian.org/633501 and has already been fixed there. Needs syncing. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 Package: libjinput-jni 20100502+dfsg-5 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.27-generic 3.2.6 Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 1.93-0ubuntu2 Architecture: amd64 CasperVersion: 1.305 Date: Sat Mar 10 13:50:03 2012 LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Beta amd64 (20120301) ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: jinput UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Affects: jinput (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: jinput (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951533 Title: libjinput-jni: contains undefined symbol EVIOCGUSAGE To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jinput/+bug/951533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 951533] Re: libjinput-jni: contains undefined symbol EVIOCGUSAGE
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #633501 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633501 ** Also affects: jinput (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633501 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/951533 Title: libjinput-jni: contains undefined symbol EVIOCGUSAGE To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jinput/+bug/951533/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 382705] Re: docky grouped menu titles are too narrow / truncated
Why did you feel the need for such a rude derogatory comment? If you'd looked carefully you'd have seen that it was originally raised as an issue 'years' ago and was raised against gnome-do. It's hardly my fault, nor is it 'LOL' worthy that it hasn't been looked at in that time. Perhaps you could do something useful and confirm if docky still fails to satisfy the defect or not? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382705 Title: docky grouped menu titles are too narrow / truncated -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 719302] [NEW] [wishlist] package lib32stdc++5 for 64-bit systems
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gcc-3.3 Currently we ship a lib32stdc++6 package to provide a 32-bit libstdc++ on 64-bit systems. However, we don't do the same for libstdc++5. Please generate a lib32stdc++5 package and upload it to the backports repository for 10.04 LTS (lucid), as well as universe archive for maverick and natty. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: libstdc++5 1:3.3.6-20~lucid1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.43-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Tue Feb 15 12:10:44 2011 ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=(custom, no user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SourcePackage: gcc-3.3 ** Affects: gcc-3.3 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719302 Title: [wishlist] package lib32stdc++5 for 64-bit systems -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 719302] Re: [wishlist] package lib32stdc++5 for 64-bit systems
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719302 Title: [wishlist] package lib32stdc++5 for 64-bit systems -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 708045] [NEW] [software-center] `unattended` == PornView
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center This may not necessarily be considered a bug in software-center, as it is mostly just displaying content that exists in the Ubuntu package archives, but I thought I should raise this as a potential issue to consider as this genuinely just happened today :-) In the office at work, someone asked me how can I get Ubuntu to automatically install all security updates for me? So I told them about the 'unattended-upgrades' package, which would cause this to happen in the background. They eagerly fired up software- center to see if they had installed the package or not and typed 'unattended' into the search box. Immediately they were confronted with this at the top of of a very short list (complete with 'icon'): PornView PornView is an image and movie viewer/manager with thumbnail previews. Additional features includes thumbnail caching, directory tree views, adjustable zoom, and fullscreen view. Slideshows allow for _unattended_ presentation of images for hands-free viewing. Pornview is written using GTK+. Now, I'm far from being a prude, but multiple questions arise from this: 1) Should such an app be included in universe when Ubuntu is pushing for inclusion in office workplaces and in schools? At the least, judging from the description, it sound like it should be pushed out to multiverse really? 2) Should software-center provide some sort of 'safesearch' option to prevent certain apps from being displayed by default? 3) ... Any thoughts? ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04 Package: software-center 3.1.10 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.37-12.26-generic 2.6.37 Uname: Linux 2.6.37-12-generic i686 Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Jan 26 14:34:51 2011 InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.04 Natty Narwhal - Alpha i386 (20101213) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 LC_MESSAGES=en_GB.utf8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: software-center ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 natty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/708045 Title: [software-center] `unattended` == PornView -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 708045] Re: [software-center] `unattended` == PornView
-- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/708045 Title: [software-center] `unattended` == PornView -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 612480] Re: Sync antlr3 3.2-4 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Note, this needs to hit natty to fix the broken builds of forked-daapd. The Build-Depends for forked-daapd should also be updated to require antlr3 = 3.2-4 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/natty/+source/forked-daapd/+builds -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to antlr3 in ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612480 Title: Sync antlr3 3.2-4 (main) from Debian unstable (main) -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 612480] Re: Sync antlr3 3.2-4 (main) from Debian unstable (main)
Note, this needs to hit natty to fix the broken builds of forked-daapd. The Build-Depends for forked-daapd should also be updated to require antlr3 = 3.2-4 https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/natty/+source/forked-daapd/+builds -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/612480 Title: Sync antlr3 3.2-4 (main) from Debian unstable (main) -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 592684] Re: avahi-support not compiled
Already reported upstream as debbug 560860 (added link). Just needs a build-depends entry adding to debian/control ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #560860 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560860 ** Also affects: mpd (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560860 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Changed in: mpd (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592684 Title: avahi-support not compiled -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 648676] [NEW] software-center sorts 'Provided by Ubuntu' by display name, everything else by package name
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: software-center The right-hand pane in software center is always sorted alphabetically. However, for the 'Provided by Ubuntu' department, these are sorted alphabetically by display name (and each item is displayed as 'Display Name' with a short description underneath). This is how I would expect them to be listed. For the partner repository, PPAs and other sources, the right hand pane is always sorted alphabetically by the APT package name, even though 'Display Name' (from the package description) is the prominently highlighted text. Each item is displayed as 'Display Name' with the package name underneath. IMO, these should all sort by display name. It looks rather strange to see a jumbled mess of package names for PPAs, after seeing cleanly sorted items under the 'Provided by Ubuntu' department. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: software-center 3.0.1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-22.33-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-22-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Sep 27 11:22:32 2010 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: software-center ** Affects: software-center (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- software-center sorts 'Provided by Ubuntu' by display name, everything else by package name https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 648676] Re: software-center sorts 'Provided by Ubuntu' by display name, everything else by package name
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648676/+attachment/1642504/+files/Dependencies.txt -- software-center sorts 'Provided by Ubuntu' by display name, everything else by package name https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 637262] [NEW] texlive-publishers has dependencies on files texlive-bibtex-extra but doesn't even recommend it
Public bug reported: At least one documentclass in the texlive-publishers package, the American Psychological Association format (apa.cls), has a dependency on a citation format (apacite.sty) that is only available in the texlive- bibtex-extra package. texlive-publishers' debian/control should at the very least have a Recommends entry for the texlive-bibtex-extra package, or probably better still have a direct Depends entry for it. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: texlive-publishers 2009-9ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-20.29-generic 2.6.35.4 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-20-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Sep 13 15:58:37 2010 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: texlive-extra ** Affects: texlive-extra (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- texlive-publishers has dependencies on files texlive-bibtex-extra but doesn't even recommend it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637262 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 637262] Re: texlive-publishers has dependencies on files texlive-bibtex-extra but doesn't even recommend it
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637262/+attachment/1578083/+files/Dependencies.txt -- texlive-publishers has dependencies on files texlive-bibtex-extra but doesn't even recommend it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637262 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 637262] Re: texlive-publishers has dependencies on files texlive-bibtex-extra but doesn't even recommend it
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #596703 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596703 ** Also affects: texlive-extra (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596703 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Summary changed: - texlive-publishers has dependencies on files texlive-bibtex-extra but doesn't even recommend it + texlive-publishers has dependencies on files in texlive-bibtex-extra but doesn't even recommend it -- texlive-publishers has dependencies on files in texlive-bibtex-extra but doesn't even recommend it https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/637262 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 631103] Re: maverick ffmpeg Unknown input format: 'x11grab'
This is trivially fixed by adding the missing Build-Depends for libxfixes-dev to ffmpeg's debian/control ** Patch added: ffmpeg-debdiff.patch https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ffmpeg/+bug/631103/+attachment/1566178/+files/ffmpeg-debdiff.patch ** Summary changed: - maverick ffmpeg Unknown input format: 'x11grab' + [patch] maverick ffmpeg Unknown input format: 'x11grab' -- [patch] maverick ffmpeg Unknown input format: 'x11grab' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631103 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 631103] Re: [patch] maverick ffmpeg Unknown input format: 'x11grab'
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #596342 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596342 ** Also affects: ffmpeg (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=596342 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- [patch] maverick ffmpeg Unknown input format: 'x11grab' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631103 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 387848] Re: fontconfig-config 45-latin.conf and ~/.fonts.conf overriden by new 60-latin.conf
another 3 months have gone by without any activity? should I unassign this and put it back to 'confirmed' if nobody is actively working on it? -- fontconfig-config 45-latin.conf and ~/.fonts.conf overriden by new 60-latin.conf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 390364] Re: unable to connect to newer Mac OS X computers using ARD 3.1+ or bonjour screensharing
Good news from Jonh Wendell (upstream). A working patch has been received and committed to enable support for connecting to Apple Remote Desktop servers using their proprietary authentication scheme. This should naturally be fixed in a future release of gtk-vnc and vinagre. This was fixed in gtk-vnc trunk (bug 570284), and the fix will be released in the next version of vinagre. http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk-vnc/commit/?id=416a0dc3592e831409e6e8c18929b785094ef87c -- unable to connect to newer Mac OS X computers using ARD 3.1+ or bonjour screensharing https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390364 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 622588] [NEW] [kvm] pci_add_option_rom: failed to find romfile pxe-virtio.bin
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: qemu-kvm using 'if=virtio' on -drive and 'model=virtio' on -net previously worked fine on earlier maverick packages on recent package updates I am now seeing this warning about pci_add_option_rom: failed to find romfile pxe-virtio.bin ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: kvm (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-17.23-generic 2.6.35.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-17-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Aug 23 09:25:11 2010 KvmCmdLine: UIDPID PPID CSZ RSS PSR STIME TTY TIME CMD root 2403 2402 15 193921 151212 1 09:24 pts/000:00:07 kvm -drive file=ubuntu-server1-snapshot.qcow2,if=virtio,boot=on -net nic,model=virtio,macaddr=DE:AD:BE:EF:10:82 -net tap -m 512 -name ubuntu-server-1 -vnc :1 MachineType: LENOVO 9087AAG ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-17-generic root=UUID=ed073970-9413-4852-8b3a-9d13e27876aa ro splash ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: qemu-kvm dmi.bios.date: 04/29/2008 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO dmi.bios.version: 2RKT44AUS dmi.board.name: LENOVO dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO dmi.board.version: NONE dmi.chassis.asset.tag: � dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO dmi.chassis.version: NONE dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr2RKT44AUS:bd04/29/2008:svnLENOVO:pn9087AAG:pvrThinkCentreM57p:rvnLENOVO:rnLENOVO:rvrNONE:cvnLENOVO:ct3:cvrNONE: dmi.product.name: 9087AAG dmi.product.version: ThinkCentre M57p dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO ** Affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- [kvm] pci_add_option_rom: failed to find romfile pxe-virtio.bin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 622588] Re: [kvm] pci_add_option_rom: failed to find romfile pxe-virtio.bin
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588/+attachment/1512301/+files/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588/+attachment/1512302/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588/+attachment/1512303/+files/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588/+attachment/1512304/+files/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588/+attachment/1512305/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588/+attachment/1512306/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588/+attachment/1512307/+files/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588/+attachment/1512308/+files/RelatedPackageVersions.txt ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588/+attachment/1512309/+files/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588/+attachment/1512310/+files/UdevLog.txt -- [kvm] pci_add_option_rom: failed to find romfile pxe-virtio.bin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 622588] Re: [kvm] pci_add_option_rom: failed to find romfile pxe-virtio.bin
You may be correct that it is an innocuous error, (I'm not using PXE boot on my VMs so don't see any otherwise missing functionality) but afaik it never used to appear on lucid and now appears on maverick packages of kvm so its technically a regression. Having investigated the issue further it seems the `kvm-pxe` package contains this bootroom and installing it makes the warning message go away, so I'm not sure why its not an automatic depends for qemu-kvm? ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- [kvm] pci_add_option_rom: failed to find romfile pxe-virtio.bin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 622588] [NEW] [kvm] pci_add_option_rom: failed to find romfile pxe-virtio.bin
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: qemu-kvm using 'if=virtio' on -drive and 'model=virtio' on -net previously worked fine on earlier maverick packages on recent package updates I am now seeing this warning about pci_add_option_rom: failed to find romfile pxe-virtio.bin ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10 Package: kvm (not installed) ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-17.23-generic 2.6.35.2 Uname: Linux 2.6.35-17-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Mon Aug 23 09:25:11 2010 KvmCmdLine: UIDPID PPID CSZ RSS PSR STIME TTY TIME CMD root 2403 2402 15 193921 151212 1 09:24 pts/000:00:07 kvm -drive file=ubuntu-server1-snapshot.qcow2,if=virtio,boot=on -net nic,model=virtio,macaddr=DE:AD:BE:EF:10:82 -net tap -m 512 -name ubuntu-server-1 -vnc :1 MachineType: LENOVO 9087AAG ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.35-17-generic root=UUID=ed073970-9413-4852-8b3a-9d13e27876aa ro splash ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: qemu-kvm dmi.bios.date: 04/29/2008 dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO dmi.bios.version: 2RKT44AUS dmi.board.name: LENOVO dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO dmi.board.version: NONE dmi.chassis.asset.tag: � dmi.chassis.type: 3 dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO dmi.chassis.version: NONE dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr2RKT44AUS:bd04/29/2008:svnLENOVO:pn9087AAG:pvrThinkCentreM57p:rvnLENOVO:rnLENOVO:rvrNONE:cvnLENOVO:ct3:cvrNONE: dmi.product.name: 9087AAG dmi.product.version: ThinkCentre M57p dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO ** Affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick -- [kvm] pci_add_option_rom: failed to find romfile pxe-virtio.bin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 622588] Re: [kvm] pci_add_option_rom: failed to find romfile pxe-virtio.bin
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588/+attachment/1512301/+files/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588/+attachment/1512302/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: Lspci.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588/+attachment/1512303/+files/Lspci.txt ** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588/+attachment/1512304/+files/Lsusb.txt ** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588/+attachment/1512305/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt ** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588/+attachment/1512306/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt ** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588/+attachment/1512307/+files/ProcModules.txt ** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588/+attachment/1512308/+files/RelatedPackageVersions.txt ** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588/+attachment/1512309/+files/UdevDb.txt ** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588/+attachment/1512310/+files/UdevLog.txt -- [kvm] pci_add_option_rom: failed to find romfile pxe-virtio.bin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 622588] Re: [kvm] pci_add_option_rom: failed to find romfile pxe-virtio.bin
You may be correct that it is an innocuous error, (I'm not using PXE boot on my VMs so don't see any otherwise missing functionality) but afaik it never used to appear on lucid and now appears on maverick packages of kvm so its technically a regression. Having investigated the issue further it seems the `kvm-pxe` package contains this bootroom and installing it makes the warning message go away, so I'm not sure why its not an automatic depends for qemu-kvm? ** Changed in: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- [kvm] pci_add_option_rom: failed to find romfile pxe-virtio.bin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622588 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 604390] Re: Upgrade Eclipse to 3.6
This is clearly in-progress, as can be seen by the ongoing branch work in git. http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-java/eclipse.git -- Upgrade Eclipse to 3.6 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604390 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 594509] Re: irqbalance main process ended, respawning
this seems to only be happening on my amd64 maverick desktop, but not on my i386 lucid laptop, both 1x Core2 Duo. both have the same irqbalance (0.55+20091017-3ubuntu3), but obv. different kernels -- irqbalance main process ended, respawning https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/594509 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to irqbalance in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 521449] Re: [needs-packaging] ppa-purge
shouldn't this just be packaged as part of one of the existing software- properties packages, rather than as a whole separate deb? -- [needs-packaging] ppa-purge https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 521449] Re: [needs-packaging] ppa-purge
(ppa-purge is very useful btw, so great job on it! :D ) -- [needs-packaging] ppa-purge https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/521449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 594509] Re: irqbalance main process ended, respawning
this seems to only be happening on my amd64 maverick desktop, but not on my i386 lucid laptop, both 1x Core2 Duo. both have the same irqbalance (0.55+20091017-3ubuntu3), but obv. different kernels -- irqbalance main process ended, respawning https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/594509 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593477] Re: Use VP8/WebM as the default video codec/format
Surely these bugs cannot be usefully completed until the ffmpeg .deb in maverick starts having compiled-in webm support? -- Use VP8/WebM as the default video codec/format https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593477 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593477] Re: Use VP8/WebM as the default video codec/format
e.g., there's not much point in recordmydesktop making .webm files when none of the editors (e.g., pitivi) based around ffmpeg can edit them -- Use VP8/WebM as the default video codec/format https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593477 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 387848] Re: fontconfig-config 45-latin.conf and ~/.fonts.conf overriden by new 60-latin.conf
any further update on this bug and what might happen for maverick? its been sitting around marked as 'in progress' for a while now :-) -- fontconfig-config 45-latin.conf and ~/.fonts.conf overriden by new 60-latin.conf https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/387848 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 399711] Re: add-apt-repository ppa:username does not add deb-src entry
This bug has been sitting waiting in review since 2010-04-01. The .diff is quite small. Any chance we could see it get some movement? :-) -- add-apt-repository ppa:username does not add deb-src entry https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399711 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 593477] Re: Use VP8/WebM as the default video codec/format
I think you'll find that the official ffmpeg trunk has only had vpx encoding for around 12 days, and webm muxing for about 8 days. Maverick is still on ffmpeg 0.5.1 (0.5.2 is latest official release) and Ubuntu tracks releases rather than svn snapshots. I'd hence hypothesis that the bugs you've raised again 'project (Ubuntu)' packages are all invalid until a) (at the very least) ffmpeg and gstreamer have made official releases with vpx and webm support and b) the upstreams for each of the projects have similarly made releases with support for vpx and webm either through their own direct linking against libvpx etc., or via ffmpeg/gstreamer prereq -- Use VP8/WebM as the default video codec/format https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/593477 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572777] Re: NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless
sounds like lucid-backports / lucid-updates might need to consider adding wpasupplicant 0.6.10 and the accompanying packages mentioned in #35 ? -- NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572777] Re: NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless
fwiw, I note that maverick is currently shipping wpasupplicant 0.6.9-3ubuntu3 which is identical to the lucid version https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/maverick/i386/wpasupplicant -- NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 518122] Re: Please rebuild for newer version of ImageMagick
/usr/lib/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/RMagick2.so: This installation of RMagick was configured with ImageMagick 6.5.5 but ImageMagick 6.5.7-8 is in use. (RuntimeError) -- Please rebuild for newer version of ImageMagick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518122 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 518122] Re: Please rebuild for newer version of ImageMagick
All did to fix this locally was rebuild against the newer imagemagick packages in lucid, no need to apply any patches $ cd /usr/src $ sudo apt-get build-dep librmagick-ruby $ apt-get source librmagick-ruby $ cd librmagick-ruby-2.11.1 $ dch -i (add changelog entry) $ dpkg-buildpackage $ cd .. $ sudo dpkg -i librmagick-ruby*.deb -- Please rebuild for newer version of ImageMagick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518122 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 533652] Re: critically low battery dialog cancel button is meaningless
Is this truly fixed? I just saw the same problem in gnome-power-manager 2.30.0-0ubuntu1 on my laptop. ** Attachment added: screenshot.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47992709/screenshot.png -- critically low battery dialog cancel button is meaningless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533652 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 533652] Re: critically low battery dialog cancel button is meaningless
(running lucid with all updates applied) -- critically low battery dialog cancel button is meaningless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533652 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 571760] [NEW] dusttheme button ordering does not match light-themes in 10.04 LTS final
Public bug reported: Since 2010-04-01 the button ordering of the light-themes was changed to be (from left) close, minimize, maximise https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/light- themes/+bug/532633/comments/564 The version of dust that shipped with the 10.04 LTS final build still has the older maximise, minimize, close ordering that the light-themes had earlier in the development cycle If dust intends to keep the buttons in the top left by default, they should be updated to match the ordering of light-themes ** Affects: dusttheme Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: gnome-themes-ubuntu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: gnome-themes-ubuntu (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Summary changed: - dusttheme button ordering does not match light-themes + dusttheme button ordering does not match light-themes in 10.04 LTS final -- dusttheme button ordering does not match light-themes in 10.04 LTS final https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571760 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 305286] Re: fails to playback ogv produced by recordmydesktop
not ideal, but the workaround for posting recordMyDesktop videos to YouTube is to losslessly remux the ogg from recordmydesktop into .mkv using mkvtoolsnix and then upload i.e., $ sudo aptitude install mkvtoolnix $ mkvmerge -o theora-vorbis-sample.mkv theora-vorbis-sample.ogg $ gnome-open http://upload.youtube.com/my_videos_upload $ Follow the usual upload procedure using the .mkv as input. Successfully results in http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dhz97zwO8Y -- fails to playback ogv produced by recordmydesktop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305286 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 559229] [NEW] eclipse-platform: /etc/eclipse.ini references non-existent xulrunner path
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: eclipse eclipse.ini is referencing xulrunner-1.9.2 but the latest package only installs to /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.2 with symlinks in /usr/lib/xulrunner The /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2 symlink does not exist. This should either be fixed in eclipse or xulrunner. $ grep xulrunner /etc/eclipse.ini -Dorg.eclipse.swt.browser.XULRunnerPath=/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2 $ ls -l /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2 ls: cannot access /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2: No such file or directory $ apt-cache policy xulrunner-1.9.2 xulrunner-1.9.2: Installed: 1.9.2.2+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 1.9.2.2+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 1.9.2.2+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 0 500 . lucid/main Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status $ ls -d /usr/lib/xulrunner-1* /usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2.2/ ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: eclipse 3.5.2-2ubuntu1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-19.28-generic 2.6.32.10+drm33.1 Uname: Linux 2.6.32-19-generic x86_64 Architecture: amd64 Date: Fri Apr 9 14:43:18 2010 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: LANGUAGE=en_GB:en PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: eclipse ** Affects: eclipse (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid -- eclipse-platform: /etc/eclipse.ini references non-existent xulrunner path https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559229 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 559229] Re: eclipse-platform: /etc/eclipse.ini references non-existent xulrunner path
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43548215/Dependencies.txt -- eclipse-platform: /etc/eclipse.ini references non-existent xulrunner path https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559229 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 559229] Re: eclipse-platform: /etc/eclipse.ini references non-existent xulrunner path
eclipse.ini cannot reference it statically I guess the fix would be to remove it from eclipse.ini and append it to the eclipse commandline by putting it in the /usr/bin/eclipse wrapper script -- eclipse-platform: /etc/eclipse.ini references non-existent xulrunner path https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559229 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 559229] Re: eclipse-platform: /etc/eclipse.ini references non-existent xulrunner path
s/statically/dynamically :-) -- eclipse-platform: /etc/eclipse.ini references non-existent xulrunner path https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/559229 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 544522] Re: [lucid] latest version of Date::Manip breaks tv_grab_uk_rt
do we not need to consider downgrading to the karmic/lenny version (5.54-1) of libdate-manip-perl before shipping lucid then? -- [lucid] latest version of Date::Manip breaks tv_grab_uk_rt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/544522 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 544522] [NEW] [lucid] latest version of Date::Manip breaks tv_grab_uk_rt
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: xmltv The latest version of Date::Manip (6.04) causes tv_grab_uk_rt in lucid xmltv (0.5.56-1) to break: $ tv_grab_uk_rt Using old-style config file XMLTV requires a Date::Manip timezone of + to work properly. Current Date::Manip timezone is wet. $ Has been fixed upstream, not yet in debian. http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=424135aid=2912037group_id=39046 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560300 ** Affects: xmltv Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: xmltv (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: xmltv (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #560300 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560300 ** Also affects: xmltv (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560300 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: SourceForge.net Tracker #2912037 http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2912037 ** Also affects: xmltv via http://sourceforge.net/support/tracker.php?aid=2912037 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- [lucid] latest version of Date::Manip breaks tv_grab_uk_rt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/544522 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540218] [NEW] qemu-common does not appear to be creating the /etc/qemuif{up, down} symlinks
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: qemu-kvm
# Abstract
qemu-common does not correctly symlink /etc/qemuif{up,down} to the
matching scripts located in /usr/bin/
# Description
qemu-if{up,down} used to be directly installed into /etc, but recent
qemu-kvm changes seem to have refactored this so that they are layed
down by qemu-common in /usr/bin and then they are meant to be symlinked
according to the package.
$ cat debian/qemu-common.links
usr/bin/qemu-ifdown etc/qemu-ifdown
usr/bin/qemu-ifup etc/qemu-ifup
This doesn't appear to be working.
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Mar 17 12:13:41 2010
Dependencies:
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
KvmCmdLine:
UIDPID PPID CSZ RSS PSR STIME TTY TIME CMD
dnwe 4018 3528 27 264156 583756 1 11:14 pts/200:16:08 kvm -m 512
-cdrom /home/dnwe/.cache/testdrive/iso/lucid-desktop-amd64.iso -drive
file=/tmp/cache.img,if=virtio,index=0,boot=on -usb -usbdevice tablet -net
nic,model=virtio -net user -soundhw es1370 -vnc :1
MachineType: LENOVO 9087AAG
Package: qemu-common 0.12.3-0ubuntu15
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-16-generic
root=UUID=ed073970-9413-4852-8b3a-9d13e27876aa ro quiet splash
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
PATH=(custom, user)
LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-16.25-generic
SourcePackage: qemu-kvm
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-generic x86_64
dmi.bios.date: 04/29/2008
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: 2RKT44AUS
dmi.board.name: LENOVO
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: NONE
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: �
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: NONE
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr2RKT44AUS:bd04/29/2008:svnLENOVO:pn9087AAG:pvrThinkCentreM57p:rvnLENOVO:rnLENOVO:rvrNONE:cvnLENOVO:ct3:cvrNONE:
dmi.product.name: 9087AAG
dmi.product.version: ThinkCentre M57p
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
** Affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid
--
qemu-common does not appear to be creating the /etc/qemuif{up,down} symlinks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540218
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 540218] Re: qemu-common does not appear to be creating the /etc/qemuif{up, down} symlinks
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41118205/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41118206/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: Lspci.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41118207/Lspci.txt
** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41118208/Lsusb.txt
** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41118209/ProcCpuinfo.txt
** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41118210/ProcInterrupts.txt
** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41118211/ProcModules.txt
** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41118212/RelatedPackageVersions.txt
** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41118213/UdevDb.txt
** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41118214/UdevLog.txt
--
qemu-common does not appear to be creating the /etc/qemuif{up,down} symlinks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540218
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu.
--
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 540218] [NEW] qemu-common does not appear to be creating the /etc/qemuif{up, down} symlinks
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: qemu-kvm
# Abstract
qemu-common does not correctly symlink /etc/qemuif{up,down} to the
matching scripts located in /usr/bin/
# Description
qemu-if{up,down} used to be directly installed into /etc, but recent
qemu-kvm changes seem to have refactored this so that they are layed
down by qemu-common in /usr/bin and then they are meant to be symlinked
according to the package.
$ cat debian/qemu-common.links
usr/bin/qemu-ifdown etc/qemu-ifdown
usr/bin/qemu-ifup etc/qemu-ifup
This doesn't appear to be working.
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Mar 17 12:13:41 2010
Dependencies:
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
KvmCmdLine:
UIDPID PPID CSZ RSS PSR STIME TTY TIME CMD
dnwe 4018 3528 27 264156 583756 1 11:14 pts/200:16:08 kvm -m 512
-cdrom /home/dnwe/.cache/testdrive/iso/lucid-desktop-amd64.iso -drive
file=/tmp/cache.img,if=virtio,index=0,boot=on -usb -usbdevice tablet -net
nic,model=virtio -net user -soundhw es1370 -vnc :1
MachineType: LENOVO 9087AAG
Package: qemu-common 0.12.3-0ubuntu15
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-16-generic
root=UUID=ed073970-9413-4852-8b3a-9d13e27876aa ro quiet splash
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
PATH=(custom, user)
LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-16.25-generic
SourcePackage: qemu-kvm
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-generic x86_64
dmi.bios.date: 04/29/2008
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: 2RKT44AUS
dmi.board.name: LENOVO
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: NONE
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: �
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: NONE
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvr2RKT44AUS:bd04/29/2008:svnLENOVO:pn9087AAG:pvrThinkCentreM57p:rvnLENOVO:rnLENOVO:rvrNONE:cvnLENOVO:ct3:cvrNONE:
dmi.product.name: 9087AAG
dmi.product.version: ThinkCentre M57p
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
** Affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug lucid
--
qemu-common does not appear to be creating the /etc/qemuif{up,down} symlinks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540218
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 540218] Re: qemu-common does not appear to be creating the /etc/qemuif{up, down} symlinks
** Attachment added: BootDmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41118205/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: CurrentDmesg.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41118206/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: Lspci.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41118207/Lspci.txt
** Attachment added: Lsusb.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41118208/Lsusb.txt
** Attachment added: ProcCpuinfo.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41118209/ProcCpuinfo.txt
** Attachment added: ProcInterrupts.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41118210/ProcInterrupts.txt
** Attachment added: ProcModules.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41118211/ProcModules.txt
** Attachment added: RelatedPackageVersions.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41118212/RelatedPackageVersions.txt
** Attachment added: UdevDb.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41118213/UdevDb.txt
** Attachment added: UdevLog.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41118214/UdevLog.txt
--
qemu-common does not appear to be creating the /etc/qemuif{up,down} symlinks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540218
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 453036] Re: eclipse must not build/ship copies of thirty party libraries
An amazing and very much appreciated effort! On 15 Mar 2010, at 21:47, Benjamin Drung benjamin.dr...@gmail.com wrote: The eclipse source package is free of binary files [1] with todays commit [2] to our git repository. [2] It does not contain .exe, .dll, .so, .so.2, *.a, .sl, .jnilib, .jar, .class, and .zip files. [1] http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-java/eclipse.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/upstream ** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress = Fix Committed -- eclipse must not build/ship copies of thirty party libraries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453036 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- eclipse must not build/ship copies of thirty party libraries https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 538105] [NEW] [lucid] lirc-modules-source fails to build in dkms
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: lirc lirc-modules-source 0.8.6-0ubuntu3 fails to compile in lucid reproduced in testdrive of latest daily lucid live cd by enabling universe and then attempting to apt-get install lirc-modules-source ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Mar 12 14:29:41 2010 Dependencies: binutils 2.20.1-2ubuntu1 coreutils 7.4-2ubuntu2 cpp 4:4.4.2-3ubuntu1 cpp-4.4 4.4.3-3ubuntu1 debconf 1.5.28ubuntu2 debconf-i18n 1.5.28ubuntu2 dkms 2.1.1.2-0ubuntu1 dpkg 1.15.5.6ubuntu2 findutils 4.4.2-1ubuntu1 gcc 4:4.4.2-3ubuntu1 gcc-4.4 4.4.3-3ubuntu1 gcc-4.4-base 4.4.3-3ubuntu1 libacl1 2.2.49-2 libattr1 1:2.4.44-1 libc-bin 2.11.1-0ubuntu4 libc6 2.11.1-0ubuntu4 libgcc1 1:4.4.3-3ubuntu1 libgmp3c2 2:4.3.2+dfsg-1ubuntu1 libgomp1 4.4.3-3ubuntu1 liblocale-gettext-perl 1.05-6 libmpfr1ldbl 2.4.2-3ubuntu1 libselinux1 2.0.89-4 libstdc++6 4.4.3-3ubuntu1 libtext-charwidth-perl 0.04-6 libtext-iconv-perl 1.7-2 libtext-wrapi18n-perl 0.06-7 lzma 4.43-14ubuntu2 make 3.81-7 module-init-tools 3.11.1-1 perl-base 5.10.1-8ubuntu1 tzdata 2010e-1 zlib1g 1:1.2.3.3.dfsg-15ubuntu1 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 10.04 Lucid Lynx - Alpha i386 (20100312) Package: lirc-modules-source 0.8.6-0ubuntu3 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash LANG=en_US.UTF-8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-16.25-generic SourcePackage: lirc Tags: lucid Uname: Linux 2.6.32-16-generic i686 ** Affects: lirc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [lucid] lirc-modules-source fails to build in dkms https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538105 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 538105] Re: [lucid] lirc-modules-source fails to build in dkms
** Attachment added: log of attempted install http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40878512/lirc-modules-source-install.txt -- [lucid] lirc-modules-source fails to build in dkms https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538105 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 538105] Re: [lucid] lirc-modules-source fails to build in dkms
** Attachment added: dkms make.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40878532/make.log -- [lucid] lirc-modules-source fails to build in dkms https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538105 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520352] Re: german translation of video quality tooltip is wrong
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 535060 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535060 I was going to update the patch with an updated export but you don't seem to have made this change, but have just updated the translation of Success? #: src/rmdStrings.py:19 msgid Success -msgstr Erfolgreich +msgstr Erfolg -- german translation of video quality tooltip is wrong https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520352 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520352] Re: german translation of video quality tooltip is wrong
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 535060 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535060 bug 535060 includes a patch for updated translations from launchpad the new German translation for this tooltip is: #: src/rmdStrings.py:52 msgid Select the video quality of your recording.\n (Lower quality will require more processing power,\n so it's recommended, when encoding on the fly,\n to leave at 100) msgstr Wählen Sie die Videoqualität der Aufnahme.\n (Niedrigere Qualität braucht weniger Rechenkraft;\n die Einstellung 100 ist damit die Empfehlung, wenn\n in Echtzeit kodiert werden soll.) Closing this bug as a duplicate. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 535060 [patch] gtk-recordmydesktop updated translations from launchpad -- german translation of video quality tooltip is wrong https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520352 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 371366] Re: gtk-recordmydesktop.desktop menu file is only translated in English and French
Updated bug to note that gtk-recordmydesktop.desktop only currently has translations for English and French, all other languages are missing. Ideally the source should be patched to grab this string out of the po/* translation files as part of the build and populate it automatically. ** Summary changed: - gtkRecordMyDesktop contextual menu description is not translated in Italian + gtk-recordmydesktop.desktop menu file is only translated in English and French -- gtk-recordmydesktop.desktop menu file is only translated in English and French https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371366 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 535060] [NEW] [patch] gtk-recordmydesktop updated translations from launchpad
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gtk-recordmydesktop Upstream is fairly inactive these days, but corrected en_US spellings in rmdStrings.py and updated translations for gtk-recordmydesktop have been prepared in launchpad [1] and already submitted to the upstream author for inclusion upstream. Attached the the next comment is a patch containing the fixed en_US spellings in rmdStrings.py and the set of newly translated and corrected files exported from translations.launchpad.net [1] https://translations.launchpad.net/gtk-recordmydesktop ** Affects: gtk-recordmydesktop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- [patch] gtk-recordmydesktop updated translations from launchpad https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 535060] Re: [patch] gtk-recordmydesktop updated translations from launchpad
** Patch added: update-translations.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40600251/update-translations.patch ** Tags added: patch ** Changed in: gtk-recordmydesktop (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- [patch] gtk-recordmydesktop updated translations from launchpad https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 535060] Re: [patch] gtk-recordmydesktop updated translations from launchpad
Updated patch to include a last minute German fix from bug 520352 ** Patch added: update-translations.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40619283/update-translations.patch -- [patch] gtk-recordmydesktop updated translations from launchpad https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535060 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 520352] Re: german translation of video quality tooltip is wrong
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 535060 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535060 OK. Have refreshed the patch in bug 535060 to include your changes :) Many thanks. -- german translation of video quality tooltip is wrong https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520352 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 534386] [NEW] [patch] gtk-recordmydesktop 'select window' does not include frame on compiz
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gtk-recordmydesktop This patch was already accepted upstream in June 2009 [1]. I thought I'd already submitted it to Ubuntu as well, but suddenly noticed it is not included in the package shipping in lucid. It should just be manually dropped into debian/patches and added to the debian/patches/series or added using `quilt import`. Tested and successfully working for me for the last 8 months or so. [1] http://recordmydesktop.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/recordmydesktop?view=revrevision=600 ** Affects: gtk-recordmydesktop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Confirmed ** Tags: patch -- [patch] gtk-recordmydesktop 'select window' does not include frame on compiz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534386 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 534386] Re: [patch] gtk-recordmydesktop 'select window' does not include frame on compiz
** Patch added: fix-compiz-frame.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40489517/fix-compiz-frame.patch ** Changed in: gtk-recordmydesktop (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed ** Tags added: patch -- [patch] gtk-recordmydesktop 'select window' does not include frame on compiz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534386 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 534386] Re: [patch] gtk-recordmydesktop 'select window' does not include frame on compiz
** Patch added: fix-compiz-frame.patch http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40489449/fix-compiz-frame.patch -- [patch] gtk-recordmydesktop 'select window' does not include frame on compiz https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534386 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 464783] Re: gnome-terminal should default to 80x25 for application compatibility
@dickey so what is your suggested fix for the usability issue? :-) -- gnome-terminal should default to 80x25 for application compatibility https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 464783] Re: gnome-terminal should default to 80x25 for application compatibility
@dickey so what is your suggested fix for the usability issue? :-) -- gnome-terminal should default to 80x25 for application compatibility https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 528324] Re: eclipse crashed with signal 5 in _XError()
I'm seeing the same/similar issue in libglib-2.0. Reproducible everytime and unaffected by removing ~/.eclipse Unhandled exception Type=Unhandled trap vmState=0x J9Generic_Signal_Number=0040 Signal_Number=0005 Error_Value= Signal_Code=0080 Handler1=7FB67EA62280 Handler2=7FB67E721260 RDI=7FB67FCFBE40 RSI= RAX=0251 RBX=0002 RCX=00030770 RDX=0001 R8=04B25DB0 R9=7FB67F5ED578 R10= R11=7FB67FA04FB9 R12=7FB67F5EDD30 R13=0003 R14=7FB67F5ED8C0 R15=7FB659D9EE80 RIP=7FB659B14302 GS= FS= RSP=7FB67F5ED860 EFlags=00200246 CS=0033 RBP=0004 ERR= TRAPNO=0003 OLDMASK= CR2= xmm0 ffff (f: 255.00, d: -5.486124e+303) xmm1 2525252525252525 (f: 623191360.00, d: 9.532824e-130) xmm2 (f: 0.00, d: 0.00e+00) xmm3 ff00 (f: 0.00, d: 1.385239e-309) xmm4 6f72622d7069746c (f: 1885959296.00, d: 6.967951e+228) xmm5 7fb64e6277c8 (f: 1315076096.00, d: 6.937718e-310) xmm6 7fb67ebc60e0 (f: 2126274816.00, d: 6.937758e-310) xmm7 046db078 (f: 74297464.00, d: 3.670782e-316) xmm8 (f: 0.00, d: 0.00e+00) xmm9 (f: 0.00, d: 0.00e+00) xmm10 3fba1a1a1a1a1a18 (f: 437918240.00, d: 1.019608e-01) xmm11 (f: 0.00, d: 0.00e+00) xmm12 (f: 0.00, d: 0.00e+00) xmm13 (f: 0.00, d: 0.00e+00) xmm14 3ff0 (f: 0.00, d: 1.00e+00) xmm15 (f: 0.00, d: 0.00e+00) Module=/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 Module_base_address=7FB659ACC000 Symbol=g_logv Symbol_address=7FB659B14100 Target=2_40_20091214_049398 (Linux 2.6.32-15-generic) CPU=amd64 (2 logical CPUs) (0x1648bd000 RAM) --- Stack Backtrace --- g_logv+0x202 (0x7FB659B14302 [libglib-2.0.so.0+0x48302]) g_log+0x83 (0x7FB659B146E3 [libglib-2.0.so.0+0x486e3]) (0x7FB65964E436 [libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0+0x0]) _XError+0xf4 (0x7FB653274DB4 [libX11.so.6+0x43db4]) (0x7FB65327B24C [libX11.so.6+0x0]) _XEventsQueued+0x37 (0x7FB65327BC07 [libX11.so.6+0x4ac07]) XPending+0x5d (0x7FB65326438D [libX11.so.6+0x3338d]) (0x7FB659645A79 [libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0+0x0]) (0x7FB65964601E [libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0+0x0]) g_main_context_dispatch+0x1f2 (0x7FB659B09DF2 [libglib-2.0.so.0+0x3ddf2]) (0x7FB659B0DC38 [libglib-2.0.so.0+0x0]) g_main_context_iteration+0x6c (0x7FB659B0DE1C [libglib-2.0.so.0+0x41e1c]) (0x7FB64BDDAF7B [libxul.so+0x0]) (0x7FB64BDDB087 [libxul.so+0x0]) (0x7FB64BE8209D [libxul.so+0x0]) (0x7FB64BE57735 [libxul.so+0x0]) (0x7FB64BDDB244 [libxul.so+0x0]) (0x7FB64BDC8464 [libxul.so+0x0]) g_main_context_dispatch+0x1f2 (0x7FB659B09DF2 [libglib-2.0.so.0+0x3ddf2]) (0x7FB659B0DC38 [libglib-2.0.so.0+0x0]) g_main_context_iteration+0x6c (0x7FB659B0DE1C [libglib-2.0.so.0+0x41e1c]) Java_org_eclipse_swt_internal_gtk_OS__1g_1main_1context_1iteration+0xf (0x7FB64E63C9F3 [libswt-pi-gtk-3555.so+0x519f3]) (0x7FB65B7D8B27 [unknown+0x0]) ** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- eclipse crashed with signal 5 in _XError() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 531315] Re: Eclipse crashes intermittently when interacting with the UI
I believe this is the same issue as described in bug 528324 i.e., using command completion etc. seem to crash eclipse it seems to be reproducible by launching a fresh workspace and then attempting to close the 'welcome' tab 1) $ eclipse -data `mktemp -d` 2) Close the 'Welcome' tab 3) Observe crash stacktrace in terminal -- Eclipse crashes intermittently when interacting with the UI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531315 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 464783] Re: gnome-terminal should default to 80x25 for application compatibility
OK, raised upstream. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611573 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #611573 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611573 ** Also affects: gnome-terminal via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611573 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- gnome-terminal should default to 80x25 for application compatibility https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 464783] Re: gnome-terminal should default to 80x25 for application compatibility
upstream seem to thing that updating the termcap (the 'workaround' in my earlier comment) is the correct fix and should be respected by both xterm and terminator i.e., /usr/share/vte/termcap/xterm xterm-xfree86|xterm-new|xterm terminal emulator (XFree86):\ :am:km:mi:ms:xn:\ - :co#80:it#8:li#24:\ + :co#80:it#8:li#25:\ so should we raise this against ubuntu/+source/vte ? -- gnome-terminal should default to 80x25 for application compatibility https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 464783] Re: gnome-terminal should default to 80x25 for application compatibility
OK, raised upstream. https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611573 ** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #611573 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611573 ** Also affects: gnome-terminal via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=611573 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- gnome-terminal should default to 80x25 for application compatibility https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 464783] Re: gnome-terminal should default to 80x25 for application compatibility
upstream seem to thing that updating the termcap (the 'workaround' in my earlier comment) is the correct fix and should be respected by both xterm and terminator i.e., /usr/share/vte/termcap/xterm xterm-xfree86|xterm-new|xterm terminal emulator (XFree86):\ :am:km:mi:ms:xn:\ - :co#80:it#8:li#24:\ + :co#80:it#8:li#25:\ so should we raise this against ubuntu/+source/vte ? -- gnome-terminal should default to 80x25 for application compatibility https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 463019] Re: recordmydesktop does not record frames properly in karmic
.debdiff looks good the sponsors often like you to have uploaded it to PPA or to attach a build log to prove it builds cleanly, then just follow usual sponsorship (subscribe the sponsors etc.) https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess -- recordmydesktop does not record frames properly in karmic https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/463019 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 382705] Re: docky grouped menu titles are too narrow / truncated
Sure, here's an example when right clicking on chromium's icon in docky showing truncated titles. By comparison, the gnome-panel displays the full titles when grouping is enabled and the context menu invoked. ** Attachment added: Screenshot.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38401438/Screenshot.png -- docky grouped menu titles are too narrow / truncated https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382705 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507864] [NEW] gbrainy text alignment broken by high dpi font setting
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gbrainy the welcome text displayed on first-load of gbrainy is not correctly aligned if the x server has been configured with a non-default DPI setting higher than 96 dpi in the example screenshot the dpi setting on the x server is 130 dpi ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Fri Jan 15 10:50:26 2010 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: gbrainy 1.30-1ubuntu1 PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-10.14-generic SourcePackage: gbrainy Tags: lucid Uname: Linux 2.6.32-10-generic i686 ** Affects: gbrainy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid -- gbrainy text alignment broken by high dpi font setting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507864 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507864] Re: gbrainy text alignment broken by high dpi font setting
** Attachment added: gbrainy-font-dpi-issue.png http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37918027/gbrainy-font-dpi-issue.png ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37918028/Dependencies.txt -- gbrainy text alignment broken by high dpi font setting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507864 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 507864] Re: gbrainy text alignment broken by high dpi font setting
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #607065 https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607065 ** Also affects: gbrainy via https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607065 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- gbrainy text alignment broken by high dpi font setting https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507864 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 415937] Re: Error Loading Last.fm Station - The remote server returned an error: (410) Gone.
Confirming as fixed in 1.5.4~really1.5.2-0ubuntu1~hyper1~karmic from ppa :banshee-team/ppa Notice that lucid is still showing 1.5.1-1 in repos. Will this be updated to include this fix before the LTS is released? -- Error Loading Last.fm Station - The remote server returned an error: (410) Gone. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/415937 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 304470] Re: unable to write to crw files
** Changed in: libimage-exiftool-perl (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- unable to write to crw files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304470 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483676] Re: eclipse gives 64-bit runtime error on 32-bit system
Apologies, I have been on vacation and unable to verify the latest .deb until today. Version 3.5.1+repack~3-0ubuntu1 also fixes the problem for me. Marking as fix released and utkatubuntu can re-open or raise a new bug if he is still seeing an issue on his system. ** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Fix Released -- eclipse gives 64-bit runtime error on 32-bit system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483676] Re: eclipse 3.5.1+repack~2-0ubuntu1 gives 64-bit runtime error on 32-bit system
The problem would seem to be the IS_64 static boolean incorrectly being set as true? static /*final*/ boolean IS_64 = 0x1L == (int /*long*/)0x1L; -- eclipse 3.5.1+repack~2-0ubuntu1 gives 64-bit runtime error on 32-bit system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483676] Re: eclipse 3.5.1+repack~2-0ubuntu1 gives 64-bit runtime error on 32-bit system
Definitely seems to be a problem with gcj's compilation to bytecode of eclipse-3.5.1+repack~2/eclipse-3.5.1/plugins/org.eclipse.swt/Eclipse SWT PI/common_j2se/org/eclipse/swt/internal/Library.java Have attached a simple test class to show the difference between a fresh compile of an identical IS_64 check, versus invoking the SWT loadLibrary compiled bytecode. This was done with the IBM 1.6 JRE $ javac -cp .:/usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.x86_3.5.1.v3555a.jar IS64.java $ java -cp .:/usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.swt.gtk.linux.x86_3.5.1.v3555a.jar IS64 IS_64: false Exception in thread main java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: Cannot load 64-bit SWT libraries on 32-bit JVM at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Library.loadLibrary(Library.java:179) at IS64.main(IS64.java:5) ** Attachment added: Simple IS_64 test class http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37124315/IS64.java -- eclipse 3.5.1+repack~2-0ubuntu1 gives 64-bit runtime error on 32-bit system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483676] Re: eclipse 3.5.1+repack~2-0ubuntu1 gives 64-bit runtime error on 32-bit system
fwiw, you can load eclipse in a debugger (jdb) by invoking something like this $ jdb -classpath /usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.equinox.launcher_1.0.201.R35x_v20090715.jar org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main -debug -consolelog -data `mktemp -d` -- eclipse 3.5.1+repack~2-0ubuntu1 gives 64-bit runtime error on 32-bit system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 483676] Re: eclipse 3.5.1+repack~2-0ubuntu1 gives 64-bit runtime error on 32-bit system
Note that it's not specific to sun jdk on my install. I had the same error running both with the IBM jdk and the icetea runtime. And the previous eclipse package ran fine with both. On 21 Dec 2009, at 22:24, Benjamin Drung benjamin.dr...@gmail.com wrote: ** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = High -- eclipse 3.5.1+repack~2-0ubuntu1 gives 64-bit runtime error on 32-bit system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483676 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber of the bug. -- eclipse 3.5.1+repack~2-0ubuntu1 gives 64-bit runtime error on 32-bit system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483676] Re: eclipse 3.5.1+repack~2-0ubuntu1 gives 64-bit runtime error on 32-bit system
Yeah the original commandline I was testing is created a new directory in /tmp and using that as workspace (mktemp -d) Re-tested with no ~/.eclipse, but still having the same problem. $ rm -rf ~/.eclipse $ eclipse -debug -consolelog -console -data `mktemp -d` ** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- eclipse 3.5.1+repack~2-0ubuntu1 gives 64-bit runtime error on 32-bit system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483676] Re: eclipse 3.5.1+repack~2-0ubuntu1 gives 64-bit runtime error on 32-bit system
seemingly 6 other people have confirmed this as also effecting them so I do not believe it to be related to my setup -- eclipse 3.5.1+repack~2-0ubuntu1 gives 64-bit runtime error on 32-bit system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 484888] Re: Allow editing photos from F-Spot Viewer
At the very least F-spot Viewer should be updated to support cropping and rotation, and then made the default action when double clicking on images. This is especially important now that Gimp is being dropped from the Lucid Live CD and default install. http://twitter.com/mpt/status/5829411979 http://twitter.com/oldmanuk/status/5831011186 -- Allow editing photos from F-Spot Viewer https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484888 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 484870] [NEW] pulseaudio-module-raop package should have pulseaudio-module-zeroconf as dependency
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: pulseaudio pulseaudio-module-raop: /usr/lib/pulse-0.9.20/modules/libava/usr/lib/pulse-0.9.20/modules /module-raop-discover.so depends on pulseaudio-module-zeroconf: /usr/lib/pulse-0.9.20/modules/libavahi- wrap.so therefore pulseaudio-module-raop should have pulseaudio-module-zeroconf as dependency pulseaudio --list-modules reports an error if the raop package is installed but zeroconf is not E: modinfo.c: Failed to open module /usr/lib/pulse-0.9.20/modules/module-raop-discover: file not found ldd before zeroconf module installed $ ldd /usr/lib/pulse-0.9.20/modules/module-raop-discover.so linux-gate.so.1 = (0x00a26000) libavahi-common.so.3 = /usr/lib/libavahi-common.so.3 (0x00119000) libavahi-client.so.3 = /usr/lib/libavahi-client.so.3 (0x008ee000) libavahi-wrap.so = not found ldd after zeroconf module installed $ ldd /usr/lib/pulse-0.9.20/modules/module-raop-discover.so linux-gate.so.1 = (0x00511000) libavahi-common.so.3 = /usr/lib/libavahi-common.so.3 (0x00957000) libavahi-client.so.3 = /usr/lib/libavahi-client.so.3 (0x009a3000) libavahi-wrap.so = /usr/lib/pulse-0.9.20/modules/libavahi-wrap.so (0x0011) ** Affects: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- pulseaudio-module-raop package should have pulseaudio-module-zeroconf as dependency https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/484870 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 428309] Re: RAOP devices are not recognised
this may be related to bug 484870 (unless you already have the zeroconf module installed) -- RAOP devices are not recognised https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428309 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 428309] Re: RAOP devices are not recognised
I knocked up a quick howto of the steps I used to get my AirTunes working just now. http://oldmanuk.tumblr.com/post/248582453/howto-stream-audio-to-apple- airtunes-in-ubuntu ** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = Incomplete -- RAOP devices are not recognised https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/428309 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483676] [NEW] eclipse 3.5.1+repack~2-0ubuntu1 gives 64-bit runtime error on 32-bit system
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: eclipse eclipse no longer starts up after upgrading to latest package in lucid, complains about 64-bit SWT libraries on 32-bit JVM $ eclipse -debug -consolelog -console -data `mktemp -d` ... java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: Cannot load 64-bit SWT libraries on 32-bit JVM at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Library.loadLibrary(Library.java:179) at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Library.loadLibrary(Library.java:159) at org.eclipse.swt.internal.C.clinit(C.java:21) at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initializeImpl(Native Method) at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:200) at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:167) at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Converter.wcsToMbcs(Converter.java:63) at org.eclipse.swt.internal.Converter.wcsToMbcs(Converter.java:54) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.clinit(Display.java:131) at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initializeImpl(Native Method) at java.lang.J9VMInternals.initialize(J9VMInternals.java:200) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.createDisplay(Workbench.java:516) at org.eclipse.ui.PlatformUI.createDisplay(PlatformUI.java:161) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.application.IDEApplication.createDisplay(IDEApplication.java:143) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.application.IDEApplication.start(IDEApplication.java:88) at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:194) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:110) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:79) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:368) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:179) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:37) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:599) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:559) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:514) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1311) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1287) ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Mon Nov 16 16:06:47 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04 Package: eclipse 3.5.1+repack~2-0ubuntu1 ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-4.5-generic SourcePackage: eclipse Uname: Linux 2.6.32-4-generic i686 ** Affects: eclipse (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- eclipse 3.5.1+repack~2-0ubuntu1 gives 64-bit runtime error on 32-bit system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 483676] Re: eclipse 3.5.1+repack~2-0ubuntu1 gives 64-bit runtime error on 32-bit system
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/35751600/Dependencies.txt -- eclipse 3.5.1+repack~2-0ubuntu1 gives 64-bit runtime error on 32-bit system https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/483676 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 481866] [NEW] genisoimage: add feature to create md5sum.txt/sha1sum.txt/other checksum file
Public bug reported: Copied verbatim from a really old upstream wishlist request on mkisofs. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=338830 Ubuntu CDs presumably pre-calculate the MD5SUMs before putting the file in the iso, but as this feature request states: it is wasteful to have to read all the files once to generate the checksum and then again to generate the iso, it'd be good to support on-the-fly creation. https://help.ubuntu.com/community/HowToMD5SUM#MD5SUM%20on%20CD --- It is very convenient to be able to check that the contents of a CD or DVD are still intact by having an md5sum.txt file at the root of the filesystem. Creating the file can, however, be somewhat cumbersome, and also requires reading all the data twice: once for generating the checksums, then to generate the disk image. It would be wonderful if mkisofs could do it on the fly. Something like this: mkisofs -checksum-file md5sum.txt -checksum-type md5 ... Obviously it would be good to be able to specify other checksum types than MD5, but even just that would be good enough: this feature is meant for checking that there is no disk corruption, not as a safeguard against tampering or counterfeiting, and MD5 is certainly good enough to detect corruption. I would not even be against creating the checksum file automatically, unless there is already a file by that name, but this may be too fancy for many people. To clarify, since someone asked me about this on irc: the point of the checksum file is to make it possible to check that a disk and its files are still working after, say, the disk has been stored for several years in a cabinet or used as the cat's scratching post. If there is a proper md5sum.txt file one can do this: cd /cdrom md5sum -c md5sum.txt That's quite a convenient way of doing it. ** Affects: cdrkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- genisoimage: add feature to create md5sum.txt/sha1sum.txt/other checksum file https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/481866 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 464783] [NEW] `qemu -ncurses` 80x25 vs gnome-terminal 80x24
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: qemu-kvm A minor (but irritating) mismatch in default sizes when running qemu using ncurses rather than SDL. gnome-terminal defaults to a 80x24 console / window size, whereas starting up `qemu -curses` creates a 80x25 (640x480) console. Thus the bottom row is not visible unless you resize your gnome-terminal window. Unsure if this counts as a gnome-terminal or qemu-kvm bug, but it is a usability mismatch. qemu-kvm: Installed: 0.11.0-0ubuntu6 gnome-terminal: Installed: 2.28.1-0ubuntu1 ** Affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- `qemu -ncurses` 80x25 vs gnome-terminal 80x24 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to qemu-kvm in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
[Bug 464783] [NEW] `qemu -ncurses` 80x25 vs gnome-terminal 80x24
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: qemu-kvm A minor (but irritating) mismatch in default sizes when running qemu using ncurses rather than SDL. gnome-terminal defaults to a 80x24 console / window size, whereas starting up `qemu -curses` creates a 80x25 (640x480) console. Thus the bottom row is not visible unless you resize your gnome-terminal window. Unsure if this counts as a gnome-terminal or qemu-kvm bug, but it is a usability mismatch. qemu-kvm: Installed: 0.11.0-0ubuntu6 gnome-terminal: Installed: 2.28.1-0ubuntu1 ** Affects: qemu-kvm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- `qemu -ncurses` 80x25 vs gnome-terminal 80x24 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 464783] Re: `qemu -ncurses` 80x25 vs gnome-terminal 80x24
NB: editing /usr/share/vte/termcap/xterm xterm-xfree86|xterm-new|xterm terminal emulator (XFree86):\ :am:km:mi:ms:xn:\ -:co#80:it#8:li#24:\ +:co#80:it#8:li#25:\ is a workaround -- `qemu -ncurses` 80x25 vs gnome-terminal 80x24 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464783 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 457277] [NEW] grep does not print warning when recursively grepping stdin
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: grep A common user error pattern is to call a recursive grep and miss off the trailing '.' for current directory. This causes grep to wait indefinitely for stdin, but users will presume it is just taking a long time to search and will leave it running $ grep -r PATTERN ... ... ...indefinite pause This is on Ubuntu karmic running the latest GNU grep 2.5.4 Contrastingly, on a Apple Mac running OS X and grep (GNU grep) 2.5.1 a helpful warning is printed in this case which immediately guides the user to their mistake $ grep -r PATTERN grep: warning: recursive search of stdin I presume this is a custom patch that has been applied to the grep binary that ships with OSX (rather than a warning message that has been purposefully removed), therefore I suggest this warning message is added to the default code base. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 Date: Wed Oct 21 15:49:26 2009 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10 Package: grep 2.5.4-4 ProcEnviron: SHELL=/bin/bash PATH=(custom, user) LANG=en_GB.UTF-8 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-14.48-generic SourcePackage: grep Uname: Linux 2.6.31-14-generic i686 ** Affects: grep Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Affects: grep (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug i386 -- grep does not print warning when recursively grepping stdin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/457277 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
