[Bug 2058785] Re: Blank screen after login on 2nd reboot after install or upgrade. 24.04

2024-04-20 Thread Doug Smythies
As of recent updates, this issue seems to be fixed.

** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: New => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058785

Title:
  Blank screen after login on 2nd reboot after install or upgrade. 24.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2058785/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059801] Re: No PDF downloads at the official website

2024-03-30 Thread Doug Smythies
I confirm your findings. I also found this: 
https://xubuntu.org/news/xubuntu-is-now-on-github/ which does suggests it is 
the official site. The ones I found were from just searching via a search 
engine.
 


** Changed in: xubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059801

Title:
  No PDF downloads at the official website

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xubuntu-docs/+bug/2059801/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059801] Re: No PDF downloads at the official website

2024-03-29 Thread Doug Smythies
Please provide the URL you are referring to. Both the "A4" and "US
letter" PDF links work fine from here:

https://docs.xubuntu.org/current/user/C/index.html

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059801

Title:
  No PDF downloads at the official website

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xubuntu-docs/+bug/2059801/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059651] Re: network-manager gets uninstalled on apt full-upgrade

2024-03-29 Thread Doug Smythies
The "sudo dhcpcd" command worked to get my network back. I had to do
another update/upgrade cycle before network-manager would re-install.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059651

Title:
  network-manager gets uninstalled on apt full-upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/2059651/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2059651] Re: network-manager gets uninstalled on apt full-upgrade

2024-03-28 Thread Doug Smythies
After the extensive upgrades of today no network. As per this bug
report, network-manager seems to be gone. In my case this is a 24.04
Ubuntu Desktop QEMU/KVM VM running on my main Debian server host.

In my case the command was "sudo apt dist-upgrade"

** Attachment added: "dpkg listing"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/2059651/+attachment/5760309/+files/dpkg-network-manager.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059651

Title:
  network-manager gets uninstalled on apt full-upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/2059651/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058785] Re: Blank screen after login on 2nd reboot after install or upgrade. 24.04

2024-03-23 Thread Doug Smythies
After a fresh install (from the 2024.03.23 ISO in this case) everything
is fine if I don't change the screen resolution from the default of
1014X768. Issues start once I change the display to 1680X1050, but seems
to recover after an idle time screen blank/lock cycle. It seems I get
into trouble because I normally operate with "Blank Screen Delay" set to
never.

Workaround: Set "Blank Screen Delay" to 1 minute and screen lock off;
After re-boot wait for the 1 minute with a messed up screen; Move the
mouse or type a key, then the screen is fine.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058785

Title:
  Blank screen after login on 2nd reboot after install or upgrade. 24.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2058785/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058785] Re: Blank screen after login on 2nd reboot after install or upgrade. 24.04

2024-03-22 Thread Doug Smythies
Note that interestingly, the newly installed VM screen did start working after 
an unknown amount of time.
I have reboot since and it still isn't working after some minutes. I had 
disabled screen locking and screen blanking when it last worked, which might be 
relevant as those wore the operating conditions of the previous VM.

** Attachment added: "A /var/log/syslog fragment."
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2058785/+attachment/5758485/+files/gnome-shell.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058785

Title:
  Blank screen after login on 2nd reboot after install or upgrade. 24.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2058785/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058785] [NEW] Blank screen after login on 2nd reboot after install or upgrade. 24.04

2024-03-22 Thread Doug Smythies
Public bug reported:

I installed 24.04 on a VM under my main Debian server host on 2024.03.17 and 
using the daily.
It worked fine.
After upgrade yesterday and after the 2nd re-boot the screen is blank after 
login. The screen is okay during re-boot, which I initiaited via an ssh session 
(I had installed openssh-server).

So, I re-installed using the 2024.03.22 daily. Same result.

I use VNC for my graphics on my VM's. I used this command to install:

virt-install -n desk-nn -r 8192 \
--disk path=/home/doug/vm/desk-nn.img,bus=virtio,size=50 \
-c noble-desktop-amd64-2024-03-22.iso \
--network bridge=br0,model=virtio,mac=52:54:00:0e:24:04 \
--graphics vnc,listen=0.0.0.0 --noautoconsole -v --vcpus=4

I do see issues with gnome-shell listed in /var/log/syslog, which I'll
post later.

The VM seems to actually be running fine, based on my SSH session.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Description changed:

  I installed 24.04 on a VM under my main Debian server host on 2024.03.17 and 
using the daily.
  It worked fine.
  After upgrade yesterday and after the 2nd re-boot the screen is blank after 
login. The screen is okay during re-boot, which I initiaited via an ssh session 
(I had installed openssh-server).
  
  So, I re-installed using the 2024.03.22 daily. Same result.
  
  I use VNC for my graphics on my VM's. I used this command to install:
  
  virt-install -n desk-nn -r 8192 \
  --disk path=/home/doug/vm/desk-nn.img,bus=virtio,size=50 \
  -c noble-desktop-amd64-2024-03-22.iso \
  --network bridge=br0,model=virtio,mac=52:54:00:0e:24:04 \
  --graphics vnc,listen=0.0.0.0 --noautoconsole -v --vcpus=4
  
  I do see issues with gnome-shell listed in /var/log/syslog, which I'll
  post later.
+ 
+ The VM seems to actually be running fine, based on my SSH session.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058785

Title:
  Blank screen after login on 2nd reboot after install or upgrade. 24.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2058785/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058660] Re: screen lock docs missing step

2024-03-21 Thread Doug Smythies
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2049405 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049405

The referred to missing URL is expected because the 11.04 documents have
been deleted after it hit EOL many many years ago. I set this as a
duplicate.

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2049405
   documentation fault for screen lock

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058660

Title:
  screen lock docs missing step

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/2058660/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058153] Re: brz crashed with launchpadlib.credentials.TokenAuthorizationTimedOut in wait_for_end_user_authorization(): Timed out after 900 seconds.

2024-03-18 Thread Doug Smythies
I figured out that I can copy and paste the link into any browser on any 
computer and then give permission for "this program to access Launchpad on your 
behalf".
Therefore I am able to continue with my work.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058153

Title:
  brz crashed with launchpadlib.credentials.TokenAuthorizationTimedOut
  in wait_for_end_user_authorization(): Timed out after 900 seconds.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/breezy/+bug/2058153/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058153] Re: brz crashed with launchpadlib.credentials.TokenAuthorizationTimedOut in wait_for_end_user_authorization(): Timed out after 900 seconds.

2024-03-17 Thread Doug Smythies
I do not know why does this (the first line is normal and is present for
context, the second isn't):

doug@desk-nn:~$ bzr whoami "Doug Smythies "
doug@desk-nn:~$ bzr launchpad-login dsmythies
The authorization page:
 (https://launchpad.net/+authorize-token?oauth_token=... 
hidden...S_permission=DESKTOP_INTEGRATION)
should be opening in your browser. Use your browser to authorize
this program to access Launchpad on your behalf.
Waiting to hear from Launchpad about your decision...

What browser? Where? anyway, I didn't observe anything anywhere, and
wasn't actually using the desktop. This was an SSH session from another
computer.

While I am following my own notes to do this work, they would have started from 
here:
https://help.launchpad.net/BzrHowto

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058153

Title:
  brz crashed with launchpadlib.credentials.TokenAuthorizationTimedOut
  in wait_for_end_user_authorization(): Timed out after 900 seconds.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/breezy/+bug/2058153/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058153] [NEW] brz crashed with launchpadlib.credentials.TokenAuthorizationTimedOut in wait_for_end_user_authorization(): Timed out after 900 seconds.

2024-03-17 Thread Doug Smythies
Public bug reported:

It seems to have crashed after a timeout period of 900 seconds. I don't
know what it wanted or why, as I was merely trying to tell bzr my user
name in the very same way I have been doing for over a decade. I do not
know why some request for interaction with a browser was being asked
for. (I'll have to add it later, from a different computer).

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04
Package: brz 3.3.5-6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-11.11-generic 6.8.0-rc4
Uname: Linux 6.8.0-11-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
BrzDebugFlags: set()
BrzVersion: 3.3.5
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CommandLine: ['bzr', 'branch', 'lp:help.ubuntu.com', 'z']
CrashDb: brz
Date: Sun Mar 17 11:31:48 2024
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/brz
FileSystemEncoding: utf-8
InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-03-17 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240317)
JournalErrors: -- No entries --
Locale: en_US.UTF-8
Platform: Linux-6.8.0-11-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.39
ProcCmdline: bzr branch lp:help.ubuntu.com z
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 TERM=xterm-256color
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
PythonVersion: 3.12.2
SourcePackage: breezy
Title: brz crashed with launchpadlib.credentials.TokenAuthorizationTimedOut in 
wait_for_end_user_authorization(): Timed out after 900 seconds.
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserEncoding: utf-8
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sudo users

** Affects: breezy (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Medium
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-crash noble wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058153

Title:
  brz crashed with launchpadlib.credentials.TokenAuthorizationTimedOut
  in wait_for_end_user_authorization(): Timed out after 900 seconds.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/breezy/+bug/2058153/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1970588] Re: screen-shot-record.html doesn't reflect surprisingly swapped print screen key behaviour

2022-05-23 Thread Doug Smythies
I thought the gnome version might be available to view, but I couldn't
find it. I couldn't remember their development directory name, but,
after many failed attempts, finally found the "unstable" directory:

https://help.gnome.org/users/gnome-help/unstable/screen-shot-
record.html.en#keyboard-shortcuts

but it seems to be the old version.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970588

Title:
  screen-shot-record.html doesn't reflect surprisingly swapped print
  screen key behaviour

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-user-docs/+bug/1970588/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1950914] Re: [daily jammy-live-server-amd64] Hangs at start of VM installation

2022-04-26 Thread Doug Smythies
O.K. thank you for your input. I confirm deletion of "--video=vmvga"
allows things to continue.

Historically, that was needed in and since 2013, when the default video
"cirrus" did not work. I now observe the default video is "qxl" which
seems to work.

Ya, apport logs are not needed for this bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950914

Title:
  [daily jammy-live-server-amd64] Hangs at start of VM installation

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1950914/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1873803] Re: Unable to create VMs with virt-install

2022-04-22 Thread Doug Smythies
Since the legacy installer is no longer available, is it correct to say
the workaround is no longer an option?

I am unable to even get started with a 22.04 server VM install on my Ubuntu 
22.04.4 server host.
I submitted bug #1950914 months ago, and wonder if it is duplicate with this 
bug. I use this command:

virt-install -n serv-jj -r 8192 \
--disk path=/home/doug/vm/serv-jj.img,bus=virtio,size=50 \
-c jammy-live-server-amd64-2022-04-21.iso \
--network bridge=br0,model=virtio,mac=52:54:00:27:1c:6e \
--video=vmvga --graphics vnc,listen=0.0.0.0 --noautoconsole -v --vcpus=4

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1873803

Title:
  Unable to create VMs with virt-install

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virt-manager/+bug/1873803/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1968757] Re: [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2022-04-19 Thread Doug Smythies
** Changed in: help.ubuntu.com
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968757

Title:
  [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/help.ubuntu.com/+bug/1968757/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1968757] Re: [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2022-04-18 Thread Doug Smythies
** Changed in: help.ubuntu.com
   Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968757

Title:
  [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/help.ubuntu.com/+bug/1968757/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1968757] Re: [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2022-04-18 Thread Doug Smythies
** Attachment added: "Proposed transparent head_logo"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1968757/+attachment/5581312/+files/header_logo.png

** Also affects: help.ubuntu.com
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Changed in: help.ubuntu.com
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: help.ubuntu.com
   Importance: Undecided => Medium

** Changed in: help.ubuntu.com
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Doug Smythies (dsmythies)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968757

Title:
  [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/help.ubuntu.com/+bug/1968757/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1968757] Re: [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2022-04-17 Thread Doug Smythies
An issue with the various reddish background banners is that everyone
seems to use something a little different for RGB. Examples: 233/84/20;
220/70/29; 208/86/48; 221/72/20 and so any logo that has a visible red
area around the white circle of friends part has a visible transition
against such a background. What is needed is a master 32X32 new circle
of friends part, with transparent background for these applications
(help.ubuntu.com, ubuntu forums, ask ubuntu, ...)

Anyway, I think we have a good enough solution for now. It should go
live on help.ubuntu.com in about 9 hours.

We'll wait for favicon.ico until the main site changes it, and then just
steal it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968757

Title:
  [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1968757/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1968757] Re: [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2022-04-16 Thread Doug Smythies
This is the hack job PNG file I created for the test. Obviously the box
will have to be more X direction pixels, which shouldn't be an issue.

** Attachment added: "new header PNG hack job"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1968757/+attachment/5581112/+files/new-header.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968757

Title:
  [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1968757/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1968757] Re: [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2022-04-16 Thread Doug Smythies
I did a hack job to make a new header_logo.png file. I used the same
foot print of 292X27 pixels, which doesn't fit the entire string, so
it'll have to be bigger. The background has some texture, so one can see
the outline of the circle of friends part.

The png file isn't global, after all. I was mistaken.


** Attachment added: "Hack job of new header logo"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1968757/+attachment/5581110/+files/new-head-logo-hack.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968757

Title:
  [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1968757/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1968757] Re: [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2022-04-16 Thread Doug Smythies
Changing the html pages header logo is going to be a little more work.
It'll have to have more pixels vertical so as to include the rectangle.
But then perhaps not because the background is RBG: 221.72.20 anyway, so
nobody will be able to see its borders. The word "documentation" is
truncated slightly at the bottom.

References: The master .css file and
https://help.ubuntu.com/img/header_logo.png

The PNG file is global, so we will need to use a new name to distinguish
22.04 from previous releases.


** Attachment added: "The header logo will be more difficult to change"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1968757/+attachment/5581099/+files/old-header-logo.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968757

Title:
  [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1968757/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1968757] Re: [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2022-04-16 Thread Doug Smythies
O.K. I am attaching another 32X32 logo with transparent side bands.
This is not official and for test purposes only.

Yes, Marcos, I believe your version ended up too narrow. The issue is
that the earlier one I created was re-sampled from a 793X514 pixel
original, and: 1, the bicubic filter introduced "ringing" artifacts; 2,
it really needed to be 21.5 pixels wide X 32 high.

I made this one centered with 5 pixels on each side band and manually
eliminated the edge "ringing". There might still be filter artifacts, I
don't know. The active area is 32X22.

Note: I did not attempt to minimize the file size. That would be the
next step.


** Attachment added: "An attempt at a test 32X32 logo with transparent side 
bands"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1968757/+attachment/5581098/+files/new-ubuntu-logo-32X32-trans.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968757

Title:
  [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1968757/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1968757] Re: [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2022-04-16 Thread Doug Smythies
Hi Gunnar,

For the HTML banner part: Yes, and I hadn't even noticed that it would
need updating also. So we would also need an official version of it.

For the 32X32 PNG file: So sorry. The one I created was just for a test,
and never intended to be the official version. I actually thought/hoped
it would convince people that the rectangle is not a good idea at these
resolutions. One can even observe the white bars against the faint
background texture (RGB: 244,244,244) on the html pages.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968757

Title:
  [UIFe] New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1968757/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1968757] Re: New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2022-04-15 Thread Doug Smythies
Just as a test, I created a 32X32 pixel rectangle logo example. This
screen shot is rather zoomed in. It doesn't look very good on a normal
screen.

Regardless, we would need master files to replace what we are using now.
That would be a 32X32 pixel PNG file and a favicon.ico file for the HTML
publications.

I do not know if other files are needed for the yelp version.


** Attachment added: "32X32 pixel rectangle example"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1968757/+attachment/5580974/+files/docs-logo-rectangle.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968757

Title:
  New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1968757/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1968757] Re: New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2022-04-13 Thread Doug Smythies
I observe that even at ubuntu.com the favicon.ico has not changed. What
we use is based on the favicon.ico.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968757

Title:
  New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1968757/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1968757] Re: New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2022-04-13 Thread Doug Smythies
Okay, thanks Gunnar for pointing me in the right direction. I did not
know. Something like the attached would be all we could do quickly.
While not of the proper rectangle dimensions, it is a square (and
probably a few pixels too big), it at least would have the new look for
the circle of friends part with the asymmetric spacing.


** Attachment added: "something like this."
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1968757/+attachment/5580444/+files/docs-logo-change.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968757

Title:
  New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1968757/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1968757] Re: New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2022-04-12 Thread Doug Smythies
Just for clarity, is the attached a representative example of what is
being asked for?


** Attachment added: "An example of what is being asked for"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1968757/+attachment/5580220/+files/docs-logo-question.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968757

Title:
  New icon still not present on Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1968757/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1967947] Re: WiFi will not connect to open WiFi with complicated re-direct

2022-04-06 Thread Doug Smythies
We are simple volunteers here on the Ubuntu-docs project. We have no
clue how to help you and/or change the documentation in such a way as to
help you. We wish we could. I suggest you ask a question on
askubuntu.com or on ubuntu forums.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967947

Title:
  WiFi will not connect to open WiFi with complicated re-direct

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1967947/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1966633] Re: wrong keyboard shortcuts for switching workspaceserror

2022-03-28 Thread Doug Smythies
Reference: shell-workspaces-switch.html, shell-workspaces-switch.page
confirmed on a 22.04 VM desktop.

** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1966633

Title:
  wrong keyboard shortcuts for switching workspaceserror

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1966633/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1965942] Re: Netmask should be replaced by Prefix?

2022-03-22 Thread Doug Smythies
O.K., and after some reading about IPv6, I agree with Manfred.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965942

Title:
  Netmask should be replaced by Prefix?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1965942/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1965942] Re: Netmask should be replaced by Prefix?

2022-03-22 Thread Doug Smythies
Netmask is the correct term. I don't currently have a desktop running to
see what is being referred to by prefix.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965942

Title:
  Netmask should be replaced by Prefix?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-user-docs/+bug/1965942/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1961101] Re: Bluetooth doesn't allow me to remove a device, and it doesn't let me activate it either without previous removal.

2022-02-17 Thread Doug Smythies
Thank you for taking the time to submit a bug report. Unfortunately this
is not a bug in the help docs, but more a user or specific Bluetooth
device issue, which might get better visibility and help via
askubuntu.con or ubuntuforums.org or similar.

I have to set this to invalid.


** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961101

Title:
  Bluetooth doesn't allow me to remove a device, and it doesn't let me
  activate it either without previous removal.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1961101/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1945221] Re: CPU frequency stuck at minimum value..again Ubuntu 20.04.3

2021-12-05 Thread Doug Smythies
I would still likes to know what MSR 0x64F says, as per comment #20.

Yes, thermald should have been disabled for all of this stuff, and I
thought it was.

Recall one the askubuntu threads, where I suggested writing 0x4005C to
MSR 0x1FC. Do so at your own risk.

Your hardware seems to have issues, and assems to be asserting the
external PROCHOT bit.

If it were me, I would disable turbo boost in BIOS, and boot into
passive mode with the schedutil governor:

GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="quiet splash intel_pstate=passive
cpufreq.default_governor=schedutil"

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945221

Title:
  CPU frequency stuck at minimum value..again Ubuntu 20.04.3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1945221/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1945221] Re: CPU frequency stuck at minimum value..again Ubuntu 20.04.3

2021-12-05 Thread Doug Smythies
Your processor is indicating this:

PROCHOT# or FORCEPR# Event (bit 2, RO) — Indicates whether PROCHOT# or FORCEPR# 
is being
asserted by another agent on the platform.

The related sticky log bit is also set.

This is something I suspected a couple of months ago, on one of those
askubuntu threads. As to why the bit does not go back to 0, I do not
know, that would be your hardware.

Please also provide the contents of MSR 0x1B2.

Note that your processor is also indicating a past power limit, via the
log bit. However, many do as they come out of the BIOS to the O.S., so
it might be a red herring. One has to clear the log bit and then watch
for it becoming set again to know for certain.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945221

Title:
  CPU frequency stuck at minimum value..again Ubuntu 20.04.3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1945221/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1945221] Re: CPU frequency stuck at minimum value..again Ubuntu 20.04.3

2021-12-05 Thread Doug Smythies
Sorry, 0x16f was wrong, it should have been 0x64F. I have no idea why
you are doing strace on this stuff. Since you haven't used my decoder,
it will be sometime before I manually decode.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945221

Title:
  CPU frequency stuck at minimum value..again Ubuntu 20.04.3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1945221/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1945221] Re: CPU frequency stuck at minimum value..again Ubuntu 20.04.3

2021-12-05 Thread Doug Smythies
Since the intel_pstate driver is asking for 3.4 GHz, but the processor
itself is only granting 0.8 GHz we now know that the throttling is
within the processor and not externally driven.

It might be related to what koba noted in comment #8, I don't know.

The processor has MSRs with bits to indicate the reasons it is
throttling, which is the next place to look. Myself, I am tried of
decoding the common MSR bits, so I wrote a decoder. It is at (coded so
as to avoid bots):

double u double u double u dot smythies dot com /~doug/temp_kernel/

Both the c code and compiled, msr-decoder.c

run as sudo: "sudo ./msr-decoder" and post the output here.

There is also a log bit reset program, that clears held bits for ongoing
work.

If you do not want to use my programs, then read MSR's 0x19c, 0x1aa,
0x1b1, 0x16f, 0x1fc and post the contents here.

As a side note: Your
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq:80 is not 50%
of maximum as dictated by
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/min_perf_pct:50. I had thought the
two getting out of sync had been fixed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945221

Title:
  CPU frequency stuck at minimum value..again Ubuntu 20.04.3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1945221/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1945221] Re: CPU frequency stuck at minimum value..again Ubuntu 20.04.3

2021-12-04 Thread Doug Smythies
When the frequency seems stuck at 800 MHz, then please put a load on a
CPU and look at the pstate request and granted MSR's.

Example, where I force CPU 2:

$ taskset -c 2 yes > /dev/null

and then look at the request and granted pstates:

$ sudo rdmsr --bitfield 15:8 -u -a 0x199
8
8
48
8
30
8
8
8
8
33
8
8

and

$ sudo rdmsr --bitfield 15:8 -u -a 0x198
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48
48

So, and as expected, I am asking for the highest patete possible for CPU
2 and being given pstate 48 on all CPUs.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945221

Title:
  CPU frequency stuck at minimum value..again Ubuntu 20.04.3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1945221/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1945221] Re: CPU frequency stuck at minimum value..again Ubuntu 20.04.3

2021-12-04 Thread Doug Smythies
Try changing to the powersave governor. If something else set another
pstate request and the intel_pstate driver doesn't know about it, then
with the performance governor it might never send a new pstate request.

All of this is very similar to a few months ago, on askubuntu and the path of 
investigation is the same.
References:
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1360985/all-cpus-stuck-at-800mhz-ubuntu-20-04-3
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1366090/ubuntu-20-04-3-lts-significant-throttling-of-intel-i7-processor
https://askubuntu.com/questions/1379048/intel-pstate-driver-not-being-loaded-when-added-to-grub-file

To check all operating parameters I do not mean to use cpufreq-info. I
mean do:

grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/*

and

grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/*

For posting herein, and as a long as you have checked that the repeated
information is the same, the second one can be shortened to (choose
whatever CPU you want):

grep . /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu2/cpufreq/*

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945221

Title:
  CPU frequency stuck at minimum value..again Ubuntu 20.04.3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1945221/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1945221] Re: CPU frequency stuck at minimum value..again Ubuntu 20.04.3

2021-12-04 Thread Doug Smythies
If the intel_pstate scaling driver is "active" then "powersave" is the
default governor. If the driver "passive" or the is the acpi-cpufreq
driver during boot, then the default governor will be "ondemand". Note
that "active-powersave" is crudely the equivalent of "passive-ondemand".
You can eliminate these default settings by stopping and disabling the
"ondemand" service. Without the service, the governor will be as defined
by the kernel configuration file or the grub command line. Recently,
Ubuntu has changed to "schedutil" as the default in the kernel
configuration.

$ grep CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT /boot/config-5.11.0-40-generic
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_PERFORMANCE is not set
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_POWERSAVE is not set
# CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_USERSPACE is not set
CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_SCHEDUTIL=y

For these "few minutes" you mention, please run a load, for example "$
yes > /dev/null", while at the same time running the following turbostat
command in another terminal:

sudo turbostat --Summary --quiet --show
Busy%,Bzy_MHz,IRQ,PkgWatt,PkgTmp,RAMWatt,GFXWatt,CorWatt --interval 10

And check all operating parameters after the slow down looking for any limiting 
change.
Post the turbostat output here.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945221

Title:
  CPU frequency stuck at minimum value..again Ubuntu 20.04.3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1945221/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1945221] Re: CPU frequency stuck at minimum value..again Ubuntu 20.04.3

2021-12-03 Thread Doug Smythies
He is using the intel_pstate CPU frequency scaling driver. Now by
default processors without HWP will boot into the intel_pstate driver in
passive mode (A.K.A. intel_cpufreq).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945221

Title:
  CPU frequency stuck at minimum value..again Ubuntu 20.04.3

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thermald/+bug/1945221/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951399] Re: Ubuntu, Budgie, Kubuntu, Kylin, MATE, Xubuntu: jammy daily fails to install

2021-11-19 Thread Doug Smythies
On the parent page, http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/cdimage/daily-live/ ,  it
says "Latest images to have passed any automatic testing; try this
first" for the "current" directory. And indeed, those files are dated
November 5th for the AMD64 versions. And yes, they do install fine,
however that is not relevant to all of these bug reports.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951399

Title:
  Ubuntu, Budgie, Kubuntu, Kylin, MATE, Xubuntu: jammy daily fails to
  install

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1951399/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1950875] Re: installer crashed. VM installation on a debian server.

2021-11-19 Thread Doug Smythies
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1951399 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951399

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1951399
   Ubuntu,Budgie, Kubuntu, Kylin, MATE, Xubuntu: jammy daily fails to install

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950875

Title:
  installer crashed. VM installation on a debian server.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1950875/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1951399] Re: Budgie, Kubuntu, Kylin, MATE, Xubuntu: jammy daily fails to install

2021-11-19 Thread Doug Smythies
Norbert wrote: "Surprisingly Ubuntu is not affected, so were installed
normally."

Disagree. It is affected and does not install.

I had set bug #1950875 as a duplicate of bug #1950132, but you removed
it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1951399

Title:
  Budgie, Kubuntu, Kylin, MATE, Xubuntu: jammy daily fails to install

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1951399/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1215665] Re: With Kernel 3.11RC6 Ubuntu servguide PDF compile crashes

2021-11-14 Thread Doug Smythies
** No longer affects: linux

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1215665

Title:
  With Kernel 3.11RC6 Ubuntu servguide PDF compile crashes

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1215665/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1950875] Re: installer crashed. VM installation on a debian server.

2021-11-14 Thread Doug Smythies
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1950132 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950132

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1950132
   jammy jellyfish daily test install crash

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950875

Title:
  installer crashed. VM installation on a debian server.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1950875/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1950875] Re: installer crashed. VM installation on a debian server.

2021-11-13 Thread Doug Smythies
This bug might be duplicate with bug #1950132, not sure. In this case it
was AMD64 desktop iso:

jammy-desktop-amd64-2021-11-13.iso, 3122440192 bytes, Nov 13 00:37

I have installed Ubuntu Desktop VMs on this Debian host server before,
but not recently.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950875

Title:
  installer crashed. VM installation on a debian server.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1950875/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1950875] [NEW] installer crashed. VM installation on a debian server.

2021-11-13 Thread Doug Smythies
Public bug reported:

This is a new installation from the daily iso of 2021.11.13.
It crashed and wanted to send you this.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: ubiquity 21.10.10
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-19.19-generic 5.13.14
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-19-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu73
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.465
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sat Nov 13 17:07:39 2021
InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed 
maybe-ubiquity quiet splash ---
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Alpha amd64 (2023)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_CA.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_CA.UTF-8
 LC_NUMERIC=C.UTF-8
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy ubiquity-21.10.10 ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1950875

Title:
  installer crashed. VM installation on a debian server.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1950875/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1940749] Re: Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices

2021-08-22 Thread Doug Smythies
Since you discovered that it is nvme drives that are not found, doesn't
that make this bug report a duplicate of bug #1841037? And read therein
that an update release is coming.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1940749

Title:
  Hardinfo 'storage' output not showing devices

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hardinfo/+bug/1940749/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1939233] Re: Bereitschaftmodus Lanverbindung weg?

2021-08-08 Thread Doug Smythies
This is not a documentation bug.

** Description changed:

  Nach Bereitschaftmodus ist Lan Verbindung & Externe Festplatten weg?
+ 
+ Translation: Lan connection & external hard drives gone after standby
+ mode?
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: ubuntu-docs 20.04.3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-25.27~20.04.1-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-25-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun Aug  8 13:40:21 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-07-28 (10 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210209.1)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
-  LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
+  LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: ubuntu-docs
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939233

Title:
  Bereitschaftmodus Lanverbindung weg?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1939233/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1939237] Re: Nach Bereitschaftsmodus ist Kabel Lan weg plus ect..?

2021-08-08 Thread Doug Smythies
This is not a documentation bug.

** Description changed:

  Bereitschaftsmodus Kabel LAN & Externe Festplatten(USB)nicht mehr Verbund?
  Bei Neustart ist wieder da!
+ 
+ Translation: Standby mode Cable LAN & external hard drives (USB) no longer 
networked?
+ When you restart it is back!
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
  Package: ubuntu-docs 20.04.3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-25.27~20.04.1-generic 5.11.22
  Uname: Linux 5.11.0-25-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.18
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Sun Aug  8 15:28:27 2021
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-07-28 (10 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.2.0 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 
(20210209.1)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
-  LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
+  LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: ubuntu-docs
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1939237

Title:
  Nach Bereitschaftsmodus ist Kabel Lan weg plus ect..?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1939237/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1926938] Re: Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-05-31 Thread Doug Smythies
Within the context of this bug report it is valid, as it is specifically
about the mainline PPA.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926938

Title:
  Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal
  20.04 LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1926938/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1926938] Re: Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal 20.04 LTS

2021-05-22 Thread Doug Smythies
When we try to help people, either here on launchpad or on forums, very
often we would like them to try the latest mainline kernel, just as a
test to determine if the issue has already been fixed upstream. This bug
prevents that useful option for previous Ubuntu versions.

This dependency should be eliminated such that Ubuntu Mainline kernels
can be installed on any valid Ubuntu release at least back to the
previous LTS, as has been the normal situation for at least a decade.

Earlier someone was asking how to compile the mainline kernel. My notes,
without the optimizations someone else was mentioning, on "how to" are
here, and they are current, even thou there is a 15.10 tag:
https://askubuntu.com/questions/718381/how-to-compile-and-install-
custom-mainline-kernel/718662#718662

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926938

Title:
  Recent mainline packages are built with Hirsuite 21.04, not Focal
  20.04 LTS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1926938/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1917813] [NEW] HWP and C1E are incompatible - Intel processors

2021-03-04 Thread Doug Smythies
Public bug reported:

Modern Intel Processors (since Skylake) with HWP (HardWare Pstate)
control enabled and Idle State 2, C1E, enabled can incorrectly drop the
CPU frequency with an extremely slow recovery time.

The fault is not within HWP itself, but within the internal idle
detection logic. One difference between OS driven pstate control and HWP
driven pstate control is that the OS knows the system was not actually
idle, but HWP does not. Another difference is the incredibly sluggish
recovery with HWP.

The problem only occurs when Idle State 2, C1E, is involved. Not all
processors have the C1E idle state. The issue is independent of C1E
auto-promotion, which is turned off in general, as far as I know.

With all idle states enabled the issue is rare. The issue would manifest
itself in periodic workflows, and would be extremely difficult to
isolate (It took me over 1/2 a year).

The purpose of this bug report is to link to the upstream bug report,
where readers can find tons of detail. I'll also set it to confirmed, as
it has already been verified on 4 different processor models, and I do
not want the bot asking me for files that are not required.

Workarounds include:
. don't use HWP.
. disable idle state 2, C1E
. change the C1E idle state to use MWAIT 0x03 instead of MWAIT 0x01 (still in 
test. documentation on the MWAIT least significant nibble is scant).

** Affects: linux
 Importance: Unknown
 Status: Unknown

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Confirmed

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

** Summary changed:

- HWP and C1E are incompatible - Intel prcoessors 
+ HWP and C1E are incompatible - Intel processors

** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #210741
   https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210741

** Also affects: linux via
   https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=210741
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1917813

Title:
  HWP and C1E are incompatible - Intel processors

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/1917813/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1908868] Re: a hot room in my father's home

2020-12-22 Thread Doug Smythies
O.K. there isn't any useful information in this bug report, nor does it
sound like a docs issue.


** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1908868

Title:
  a hot room in my father's home

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1908868/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1872200] Re: apt does not accept globs and regexes in some cases

2020-05-12 Thread Doug Smythies
I tested apt version 2.0.3. This:

sudo apt install gnome-user-docs* gnome-getting-started-docs*

whereas it did not before, and I had to use Gunnar's workaround from
comment #6 above.

** Tags removed: verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done-focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872200

Title:
  apt does not accept globs and regexes in some cases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1872200/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1875974] Re: driver for acer aspire 5920 Crystal Eye

2020-04-29 Thread Doug Smythies
this doesn't appear to be a bug at all, and not against ubuntu-docs in
particular.

If the existing kernel module, uvcvideo.ko, doesn't work for you,
perhaps look for support on askubuntu.com elsewhere.


** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1875974

Title:
  driver for acer aspire 5920 Crystal Eye

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1875974/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1874732] Re: Instllation guide has broken links

2020-04-24 Thread Doug Smythies
** Summary changed:

- Server docs have broken links
+ Instllation guide has broken links

** Summary changed:

- Instllation guide has broken links
+ Installation guide has broken links

** Project changed: help.ubuntu.com => installation-guide (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874732

Title:
  Installation guide has broken links

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/installation-guide/+bug/1874732/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1874590] Re: Installation guide for 20.04 Server is missing, says to use 18.04 docs but provides no link to 18.04 docs

2020-04-23 Thread Doug Smythies
I had troubles compiling the installation guide on a 20.04 computer.
Additionally, i had an issue with the redirects to a the new serverguide site.

The installation guide will be there past noon UTC.

i was not aware of the "Official Doumentation" link issue, but it should
also be fixed upon tomorrow's publication.

Sorry for your troubles.

** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => help.ubuntu.com

** Branch linked: lp:help.ubuntu.com

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874590

Title:
  Installation guide for 20.04 Server is missing, says to use 18.04 docs
  but provides no link to 18.04 docs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/help.ubuntu.com/+bug/1874590/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1874590] Re: Installation guide for 20.04 Server is missing, says to use 18.04 docs but provides no link to 18.04 docs

2020-04-23 Thread Doug Smythies
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Doug Smythies (dsmythies)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874590

Title:
  Installation guide for 20.04 Server is missing, says to use 18.04 docs
  but provides no link to 18.04 docs

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/help.ubuntu.com/+bug/1874590/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1874498] Re: 404 ntp documentation: lts/serverguide/NTP.html

2020-04-23 Thread Doug Smythies
By the way, once the redirect is fixed it will go to here:

https://ubuntu.com/server/docs

not here:

https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/network-ntp


** Branch linked: lp:help.ubuntu.com

** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => help.ubuntu.com

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874498

Title:
  404 ntp documentation: lts/serverguide/NTP.html

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/help.ubuntu.com/+bug/1874498/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1874498] Re: 404 ntp documentation: lts/serverguide/NTP.html

2020-04-23 Thread Doug Smythies
I made a mistake on the redirection to the new site for the lts serverguide.
the fix has been committed, but will not go live until after noon UTC tomorrow.

Sorry.

Meanwhile go here:

https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/network-ntp

Thank you for your report.

** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Fix Committed

** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided => Critical

** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Doug Smythies (dsmythies)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1874498

Title:
  404 ntp documentation: lts/serverguide/NTP.html

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1874498/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1872200] Re: apt does not accept globs and regexes in some cases

2020-04-17 Thread Doug Smythies
@Gunnar : Thank you for the workaround. It solved my problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1872200

Title:
  apt does not accept globs and regexes in some cases

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1872200/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1868019] Re: [FFe] Add method to enable fractional scaling

2020-03-30 Thread Doug Smythies
Ya, those e-mails to the lists were too big, due to big html and with an
embedded png file. So they bounced even after being approved in
moderation. I sent an edited e-mail to the lists.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868019

Title:
  [FFe] Add method to enable fractional scaling

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1868019/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1864992] Re: depmod: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod.c:515 lookup_builtin_file() could not open builtin file '/lib/modules/5.4.0-14-generic/modules.builtin.bin'

2020-03-03 Thread Doug Smythies
For what it's worth, the versions of things in my test computers, all
servers, no GUI:

name: serv-ff (a 20.04 VM, that has not had an update since around February 
12th):
initramfs-tools: 0.133ubuntu14
kmod; 26-3ubuntu1

name: s18 (a physical i5-9600K based computer, up to date as of a few days ago):
initramfs-tools: 0.136ubuntu1
kmod; 27-1ubuntu1

name: s15 (a physical i7-2600K based computer, up to date as of a few days ago):
initramfs-tools: 0.136ubuntu1
kmod; 27-1ubuntu1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864992

Title:
  depmod: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod.c:515 lookup_builtin_file() could
  not open builtin file
  '/lib/modules/5.4.0-14-generic/modules.builtin.bin'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/curtin/+bug/1864992/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1864436] Re: depmod: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod.c:515 lookup_builtin_file() could not open builtin file

2020-03-03 Thread Doug Smythies
I think bug 1864992 and this one are duplicates.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864436

Title:
  depmod: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod.c:515 lookup_builtin_file() could
  not open builtin file

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kmod/+bug/1864436/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1864992] Re: depmod: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod.c:515 lookup_builtin_file() could not open builtin file '/lib/modules/5.4.0-14-generic/modules.builtin.bin'

2020-03-02 Thread Doug Smythies
** Changed in: kmod (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864992

Title:
  depmod: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod.c:515 lookup_builtin_file() could
  not open builtin file
  '/lib/modules/5.4.0-14-generic/modules.builtin.bin'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/curtin/+bug/1864992/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1864992] Re: depmod: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod.c:515 lookup_builtin_file() could not open builtin file '/lib/modules/5.4.0-14-generic/modules.builtin.bin'

2020-03-02 Thread Doug Smythies
I have a 20.04 VM that I had not run for awhile (Feb 12th). It has kmod
version 26-3ubuntu1, and installed mainline kernel
5.6.0-050600rc4-lowlatency fine.

The other two physical 20.04 test servers have kmod version 27-1ubuntu1,
and both spew the error 5600 times during kernel installation the first
time. If I reinstall the same kernel there are no errors spewed. If I
purge the kernel and re-install it, then the error is spewed 5600 times
again.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864992

Title:
  depmod: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod.c:515 lookup_builtin_file() could
  not open builtin file
  '/lib/modules/5.4.0-14-generic/modules.builtin.bin'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/curtin/+bug/1864992/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1864992] Re: depmod: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod.c:515 lookup_builtin_file() could not open builtin file '/lib/modules/5.4.0-14-generic/modules.builtin.bin'

2020-03-02 Thread Doug Smythies
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1863261 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1863261

I don't think this is duplicate either. I agree that this seems to be in
the kernel, but don't yet have proof. If I compile the mainline kernel
(5.6-rc4) myself i get this error 5600 times (once per module):

depmod: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod.c:515 lookup_builtin_file() could not
open builtin file '/home/doug/temp-k-git/linux/debian/linux-
image/lib/modules/5.6.0-rc4-stock/modules.builtin.bin'

but the file is there (well, afterwards at least).
I didn't notice this with kernel 5.6-rc2, but might not have been looking.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864992

Title:
  depmod: ERROR: ../libkmod/libkmod.c:515 lookup_builtin_file() could
  not open builtin file
  '/lib/modules/5.4.0-14-generic/modules.builtin.bin'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/curtin/+bug/1864992/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1858053] Re: Typo in https://help.ubuntu.com/

2020-01-01 Thread Doug Smythies
change "affects" to appropriate project.

** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => help.ubuntu.com

** Changed in: help.ubuntu.com
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Doug Smythies (dsmythies)

** Changed in: help.ubuntu.com
   Status: New => In Progress

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1858053

Title:
  Typo in https://help.ubuntu.com/

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/help.ubuntu.com/+bug/1858053/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1854653] Re: during shutdown libvirt-guests.sh shouldn't run if libvirtd isn't running

2019-12-01 Thread Doug Smythies
For example, this seems to work well:

doug@goom-i5:~/config/usr/lib/libvirt$ diff libvirt-guests.sh.original 
libvirt-guests.sh
114,124c114,126
< i=${CONNECT_RETRIES}
< while [ $i -gt 0 ]; do
< run_virsh "$uri" connect 2>/dev/null
< if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
< return 0;
< fi
< sleep ${RETRIES_SLEEP}
< eval_gettext "Unable to connect to libvirt currently. Retrying .. \$i"
< i=$(($i-1))
< done
< eval_gettext "Can't connect to \$uri. Skipping."
---
> if `pidof libvirtd 1>/dev/null`; then
> i=${CONNECT_RETRIES}
> while [ $i -gt 0 ]; do
> run_virsh "$uri" connect 2>/dev/null
> if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then
> return 0;
> fi
> sleep ${RETRIES_SLEEP}
> eval_gettext "Unable to connect to libvirt currently. Retrying .. 
> \$i"
> i=$(($i-1))
> done
> eval_gettext "Can't connect to \$uri. Skipping."
> fi

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854653

Title:
  during shutdown libvirt-guests.sh shouldn't run if libvirtd isn't
  running

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1854653/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1854653] [NEW] during shutdown libvirt-guests.sh shouldn't run if libvirtd isn't running

2019-12-01 Thread Doug Smythies
Public bug reported:

The libvirtd service being started during boot doesn't mean it is still running 
during shutdown.
libvirt-guests.sh waits around for 10 seconds trying to communicate with it, 
re-trying once per second.
The desire is that it either doesn't run at all or it checks if libvirtd is 
even running before wasting the 10 seconds.

As a use case example:
I often disable extraneous services so as to get my test server to be very 
"idle", much more idle than a typical user, particularly with a desktop type 
GUI, can achieve. I can easily re-boot 50 times in a day, and get hit by this 
10 seconds every time.

Example:

Dec 01 13:52:13 goom-i5 libvirt-guests.sh[3717]: Unable to connect to libvirt 
currently. Retrying .. 10
Dec 01 13:52:14 goom-i5 libvirt-guests.sh[3717]: Unable to connect to libvirt 
currently. Retrying .. 9
Dec 01 13:52:15 goom-i5 libvirt-guests.sh[3717]: Unable to connect to libvirt 
currently. Retrying .. 8
Dec 01 13:52:16 goom-i5 libvirt-guests.sh[3717]: Unable to connect to libvirt 
currently. Retrying .. 7
Dec 01 13:52:17 goom-i5 libvirt-guests.sh[3717]: Unable to connect to libvirt 
currently. Retrying .. 6
Dec 01 13:52:18 goom-i5 libvirt-guests.sh[3717]: Unable to connect to libvirt 
currently. Retrying .. 5
Dec 01 13:52:19 goom-i5 libvirt-guests.sh[3717]: Unable to connect to libvirt 
currently. Retrying .. 4
Dec 01 13:52:20 goom-i5 libvirt-guests.sh[3717]: Unable to connect to libvirt 
currently. Retrying .. 3
Dec 01 13:52:21 goom-i5 libvirt-guests.sh[3717]: Unable to connect to libvirt 
currently. Retrying .. 2
Dec 01 13:52:22 goom-i5 libvirt-guests.sh[3717]: Unable to connect to libvirt 
currently. Retrying .. 1Can't connect to default. Skipping.

This occurs on my old 16.04 test server and a newly created 20.04 test
server.

** Affects: libvirt (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1854653

Title:
  during shutdown libvirt-guests.sh shouldn't run if libvirtd isn't
  running

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1854653/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1845562] Re: libvirt error Invalid value '+cpu' for 'cgroup.subtree_control'

2019-12-01 Thread Doug Smythies
I had this error today.
It was on a 20.04 development test server, upon which I was trying to start a 
freshly installed 20.04 server guest.
The error occurred because I had this on my grub command line:

cgroup_no_v1=all

Once I removed it, the VM started fine.
Note that I do not use virt-manager, I was using "virsh start serv-dev".

Why did I originally have "cgroup_no_v1=all"?
Well, I forgot to get rid of it, after debugging problems with the schedutil 
governor for either the intel_cpufreq (intel_pstate in passive mode) or 
acpi-cpufreq CPU frequency scaling drivers for mainline kernel 5.4, where it 
gets busted due to "UCLAMP_TASK_GROUP=Y"in the Ubuntu kernel configuration.

I was using kernel 5.3.0-18-generic today.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1845562

Title:
  libvirt error Invalid value '+cpu' for 'cgroup.subtree_control'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libvirt/+bug/1845562/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1768976] Re: Ubuntu 18.04 is overheating after upgrade from 16.04

2019-12-01 Thread Doug Smythies
Each CPU can have a different request into the PLL (phase locked loop),
but the highest one wins, and their vote does not count if they are in
an idle state deeper than C1. You can observe this manually by reading
the pstate request and granted MSRs directly (requires msr-tools, and
the msr module must already be loaded). Example (requested, granted,
100% load on CPU 3):

root@s15:/home/doug/temp-git-git# rdmsr --bitfield 15:8 -d -a 0x199
16
16
16
38
16
16
16
16
root@s15:/home/doug/temp-git-git# rdmsr --bitfield 15:8 -d -a 0x198
36
35
36
36
36
36
36
36

Where 38 is the max and 16 in the min for my i7-2600K.
Why only 36 granted? because actually I guess three cores are active at the 
time of the sample. From turbostat:

cpu0: MSR_TURBO_RATIO_LIMIT: 0x23242526
35 * 100.0 = 3500.0 MHz max turbo 4 active cores
36 * 100.0 = 3600.0 MHz max turbo 3 active cores
37 * 100.0 = 3700.0 MHz max turbo 2 active cores
38 * 100.0 = 3800.0 MHz max turbo 1 active cores

Note: I ran the above as root because there is a lot over overhead
running it under "sudo", which tends to result in another CPU requesting
a high pstate by the time the sample is actually taken.

Now, the different reported CPU frequencies, for your example where
there is no dominant load, is another story. While there is only one
PLL, your mostly idle CPUs would be "awake" at different times, with the
PLL ramping up and down based on which incoming votes and requests are
being used.

Hope this helps, and apologies for this digression on this bug report.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768976

Title:
  Ubuntu 18.04 is overheating after upgrade from 16.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1768976/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1768976] Re: Ubuntu 18.04 is overheating after upgrade from 16.04

2019-11-30 Thread Doug Smythies
There is only one PLL (Phase Locked Loop) in the processor, all CPUs get
the resulting clock. When they go into deep idle states (deeper than C1,
at least for my processor) then they give up their vote into the PLL as
to what the frequency should be. Your single 100% task is dedicating the
CPU frequency for all, for when they are active.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768976

Title:
  Ubuntu 18.04 is overheating after upgrade from 16.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1768976/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1768976] Re: Ubuntu 18.04 is overheating after upgrade from 16.04

2019-11-30 Thread Doug Smythies
@Davide Sangalli: What you describe and show in your comment #80 is
correct and exactly what should happen. Your processor is spending an
extraordinary amount of time in C1 as opposed to deeper idle states. At
what sampling frequency do you run i7z? I would suggest once every 15
seconds or so, so that you don't wake up CPUs just to ask them status
stuff.

Everyone with this problem: If you don't bisect the kernel to isolate
the offending commit, as has been asked for a couple of times now, then
there will never be any progress for this bug report.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1768976

Title:
  Ubuntu 18.04 is overheating after upgrade from 16.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1768976/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 869017] Re: Ubuntu server enables screenblanking, concealing crashdumps (DPMS is not used)

2019-11-25 Thread Doug Smythies
Ever since the default changed to never blanking the screen, and after I
whined in comment #18 above, I have been running this in
/etc/default/grub:

GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT=" consoleblank=300 "

always save a copy of grub first, and do "sudo update-grub afterwards",
then re-boot.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869017

Title:
  Ubuntu server enables screenblanking, concealing crashdumps (DPMS is
  not used)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kbd/+bug/869017/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1848581] Re: video rendering running very very slow

2019-10-18 Thread Doug Smythies
Not sure what package is the problem, but am sure it is not Ubuntu-docs.

** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848581

Title:
  video rendering running very very slow

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1848581/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1844201] Re: turbostat is over constrained by dependencies

2019-09-16 Thread Doug Smythies
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844201

Title:
  turbostat is over constrained  by dependencies

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1844201/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1844201] Re: turbostat is over constrained by dependencies

2019-09-16 Thread Doug Smythies
You do not need any logs for this bug report.

** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844201

Title:
  turbostat is over constrained  by dependencies

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1844201/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1844201] [NEW] turbostat is over constrained by dependencies

2019-09-16 Thread Doug Smythies
Public bug reported:

For processors on which it works, turbostat is a very very good
diagnostic tool. For many upstream escalations, it is the preferred
tool. However the Ubuntu implementation doesn't actually execute
turbostat directly, but rather goes to some script with incredibly
tight, and unnecessary,  kernel version dependency checks. This makes it
difficult when trying to help others when we want them to try a newer or
older kernel, and often we have to get them to override this and use
turbostat directly.

While turbostat is part of the kernel source tree, it does not depend on the 
kernel version at all.
Here is an excerpt from a recent e-mail [1] from the turbostat maintainer:

> FWIW,
> 
> The latest turbostat and x86_energy_perf_policy utilities
> in the upstream kernel tree should always be backward compatible
> with all old kernels.  If that is EVER not the case, I want to know about it.
>
> Yes, I know that some distros ship old versions of these utilities built
> out of their matching kernel tree snapshots.
> Yes, applying upstream fixes to .stable for such distros is a good thing.
>
> However, the better solution for these particular utilities, is that they
> simply always use upstream utilities -- even with old kernels.
>
> When somebody reports a problem and I need them to run these tools,
> 100% of the time, I start by sending them the latest upstream version
> to replace the old version shipped by the distro.

I have been using turbostat for several years, minus the Ubuntu part,
and never had a problem with any version of turbostat with any kernel.

This bug report is to request the deletion of the dependency check for
Ubuntu. I am not saying it always has to be the latest version, but it
should not be crippled by the dependency check.

[1] https://marc.info/?l=linux-pm=156770359620861=2

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844201

Title:
  turbostat is over constrained  by dependencies

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1844201/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1817321] Re: installer does not support iSCSI iBFT

2019-09-15 Thread Doug Smythies
the source code for the serverguide is migrating to a different markup
language for 20.04. The migration was done a few days before these
revisions were committed. They need to be copied to the new source. I am
attempting to add "target to series" stuff to this bug report, but it is
not working, like other ones I have done already.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1817321

Title:
  installer does not support iSCSI iBFT

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debian-installer/+bug/1817321/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1843945] Re: note: new server guide

2019-09-13 Thread Doug Smythies
** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => In Progress

** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Doug Smythies (dsmythies)

** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => help.ubuntu.com

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843945

Title:
  note: new server guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/help.ubuntu.com/+bug/1843945/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1830961] Re: Kernels & kernel drivers fail to build with gcc-9 [error: ‘-mindirect-branch’ and ‘-fcf-protection’ are not compatible]

2019-07-20 Thread Doug Smythies
Several posters are asking for the mainline builds to be fixed. The
mainline builds are an exact reflection of the upstream git master
repositories. Therefore they have to wait for Seth's patch submission,
which has been picked up and accepted by the kbuild team, to propagate
it's way to the mainline upstream git branch. Earlier today, a kernel
5.3-rc1 merge request was issued by the kbuild team [1]. Once that
branch has been "pulled" into the upstream mainline, the Ubuntu mainline
daily compiles should start working the next day. In about 8 days there
will be kernel 5.3-rc1, which should have the patch.

[1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-kbuild/msg22526.html

Other references:

https://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/daily/
https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-kbuild/msg22298.html
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11037379/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1830961

Title:
  Kernels & kernel drivers fail to build with gcc-9 [error: ‘-mindirect-
  branch’ and ‘-fcf-protection’ are not compatible]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-9/+bug/1830961/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1836373] Re: Mainline builds for 5.1 and 5.2 failing for amd64 and i386

2019-07-12 Thread Doug Smythies
This is duplicate with bug 1830961.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1836373

Title:
  Mainline builds for 5.1 and 5.2 failing for amd64 and i386

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1836373/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1830961] Re: Kernels & kernel drivers fail to build with gcc-9 [error: ‘-mindirect-branch’ and ‘-fcf-protection’ are not compatible]

2019-07-10 Thread Doug Smythies
If I make the same changes to the Makefile as per the link in comment
#16, then the kernel compiles fine and without the zillions of warnings
I mentioned in comment #13. However I can not find this anywhere
"upstream" as the notes seem to indicate.

doug@serv-ee:~/temp-k-git/linux$ git diff
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 3e4868a6498b..d8ccc47215be 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -630,8 +630,8 @@ ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
   CC_FLAGS_FTRACE := -pg
 endif

-RETPOLINE_CFLAGS_GCC := -mindirect-branch=thunk-extern 
-mindirect-branch-register
-RETPOLINE_VDSO_CFLAGS_GCC := -mindirect-branch=thunk-inline 
-mindirect-branch-register
+RETPOLINE_CFLAGS_GCC := -mindirect-branch=thunk-extern 
-mindirect-branch-register -fcf-protection=none
+RETPOLINE_VDSO_CFLAGS_GCC := -mindirect-branch=thunk-inline 
-mindirect-branch-register -fcf-protection=none
 RETPOLINE_CFLAGS_CLANG := -mretpoline-external-thunk
 RETPOLINE_VDSO_CFLAGS_CLANG := -mretpoline
 RETPOLINE_CFLAGS := $(call cc-option,$(RETPOLINE_CFLAGS_GCC),$(call 
cc-option,$(RETPOLINE_CFLAGS_CLANG)))

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1830961

Title:
  Kernels & kernel drivers fail to build with gcc-9 [error: ‘-mindirect-
  branch’ and ‘-fcf-protection’ are not compatible]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-9/+bug/1830961/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1830961] Re: Kernels & kernel drivers fail to build with gcc-9 [error: ‘-mindirect-branch’ and ‘-fcf-protection’ are not compatible]

2019-07-09 Thread Doug Smythies
As per comment #4, i made the same change:

doug@serv-ee:~/temp-k-git/linux$ git diff
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index 3e4868a6498b..68f0858484a5 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -630,8 +630,8 @@ ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_TRACER
   CC_FLAGS_FTRACE := -pg
 endif

-RETPOLINE_CFLAGS_GCC := -mindirect-branch=thunk-extern 
-mindirect-branch-register
-RETPOLINE_VDSO_CFLAGS_GCC := -mindirect-branch=thunk-inline 
-mindirect-branch-register
+RETPOLINE_CFLAGS_GCC := -mindirect-branch-register
+RETPOLINE_VDSO_CFLAGS_GCC := -mindirect-branch-register
 RETPOLINE_CFLAGS_CLANG := -mretpoline-external-thunk
 RETPOLINE_VDSO_CFLAGS_CLANG := -mretpoline
 RETPOLINE_CFLAGS := $(call cc-option,$(RETPOLINE_CFLAGS_GCC),$(call 
cc-option,$(RETPOLINE_CFLAGS_CLANG)))

And while the kernel compile had a constant stream of warnings, the
resulting kernel (5.2) works fine.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1830961

Title:
  Kernels & kernel drivers fail to build with gcc-9 [error: ‘-mindirect-
  branch’ and ‘-fcf-protection’ are not compatible]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-9/+bug/1830961/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1804786] Re: Garbage occurred when Playing the video in the Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2019-05-27 Thread Doug Smythies
On 2019.05.26 19:18 Daniel van Vugt wrote:
> This bug might be getting confused...

I disagree.

> Doug: You are reporting problems with the radeon
> graphics driver,

No, I am providing additional information in support of the original bug
report, proving that the issue occurs on multiple platforms and appears
to be somewhat independent of the graphics driver involved.

> and vmware.

I don't use vmware. It was a kvm/libvirt/qemu type VM.

> hugh: Please answer comment #20. Your feedback is most needed here.

Given that hugh did not reply, I did and consider my feedback on this
bug report to be just as important.

By the way, reverse engineering the system response to the "play again"
stimulus, was not an easy task, but I believe provides insight.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804786

Title:
  Garbage occurred when Playing the video in the Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/yelp/+bug/1804786/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1804786] Re: Garbage occurred when Playing the video in the Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2019-05-25 Thread Doug Smythies
The VM that I revived had not been run or updated since an early
development version of 18.04, and it worked fine for playing the help
videos. When I updated it, the yelp package did not update, but webkit
did:

doug@desk-aa:~$ grep -i webkit /var/log/apt/term.log | grep over
Unpacking libwebkit2gtk-4.0-37:amd64 (2.24.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1) over (2.20.1-1) 
...
Unpacking gir1.2-webkit2-4.0:amd64 (2.24.1-0ubuntu0.18.04.1) over (2.20.1-1) ...

After the update to current package versions, the help video issue was present.
I looked at the changelog at 
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit2gtk/+changelog
but am not familiar with this stuff and didn't notice anything, but probably 
wouldn't have anyhow.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804786

Title:
  Garbage occurred when Playing the video in the Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/yelp/+bug/1804786/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1804786] Re: Garbage occurred when Playing the video in the Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2019-05-25 Thread Doug Smythies
** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804786

Title:
  Garbage occurred when Playing the video in the Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/yelp/+bug/1804786/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1804786] Re: Garbage occurred when Playing the video in the Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2019-05-25 Thread Doug Smythies
I have 3 computers running Ubuntu desktop edition:
An old HP LapTop, 19.04;
An old Apple iMac, 18.04;
And a VM, 18.04, running on my main Ubuntu 16.04 test server.
All 3 have the issues, with one main difference in the 19.04 verses 18.04 "play 
again" stimulus response. 

Attached is the "lspci -k > lspcik.txt" information for all 3 combined
into the one file.

Note: I almost always jump to the last few seconds when playing the
video, to save time. I have never noticed any difference in system
response for subsequent video playing when jumping to near the end
verses letting it just play to the end.

For: "yelp help:gnome-help": There are sometimes a few of these, and
more on the HP:

Xlib: sequence lost (0x100f2 > 0xf4) in reply type 0x0!

Responses from a new terminal execution of: "yelp help:gnome-help":

0 <= integer N <= infinity (actually tested to N = 4)

Do N times{
  wait > 60 seconds after the video finishes
  play the video again.
  The video plays correctly.
}
wait < 57 seconds after the video finishes
play the video again.
The video plays correctly on the iMac and the VM, both 18.04, but incorrectly 
on the HP, 19.04.
Now wait either less than 57 seconds or more than 60 seconds and then play the 
video again.
If the wait was < 57 seconds then the video plays incorrectly now and 
thereafter, no matter the time waited between plays.
If the wait was > 60 seconds then the video plays correctly now and thereafter, 
no matter the time waited between plays.


** Attachment added: "lspcik_all.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/webkit2gtk/+bug/1804786/+attachment/5266452/+files/lspcik_all.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804786

Title:
  Garbage occurred when Playing the video in the Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/yelp/+bug/1804786/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1804786] Re: Garbage occurred when Playing the video in the Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2019-05-19 Thread Doug Smythies
@Gunnar asked:

> @Doug: Are you using Nouveau or some other graphics driver?

Both desktop computers (one an old MAC with 18.04, and one the old HP
LapTop I revived the other day with (now) 19.04) are using Radeon
drivers. From the command you gave me off-list:

$ lspci -nnk | grep -i vga -A3 | grep 'in use'
Kernel driver in use: radeon

Attached is an edited (core dump removed) crash dump file from a yelp
crash while trying to "save video as", as per note 2 in the bug
description. The interesting stuff starts at line 2019:

2019: May 17 13:48:42 cyd-hp2 yelp[3740]: Invalid UTF-8 string passed to
pango_layout_set_text()

The originating error was:

yelp assert failure: free(): double free detected in tcache 2


** Attachment added: "_usr_bin_yelp.1000.crash"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-getting-started-docs/+bug/1804786/+attachment/5264887/+files/_usr_bin_yelp.1000.crash

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804786

Title:
  Garbage occurred when Playing the video in the Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/yelp/+bug/1804786/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1804786] Re: Garbage occurred when Playing the video in the Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2019-05-17 Thread Doug Smythies
I revived an old LapTop, that had Desktop 18.04 on it. Updated to current 18.04.
Verified that this video issue was present.
Upgraded the computer to 18.10.
Ran one help video about 15 times without any issues.
Upgraded the computer to 19.04.
Ran the video only 2 times before it messed up. It messed up every time 
thereafter.

I am not aware that I did anything different between the 18.04, 18.10
and 19.04 help video tests.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804786

Title:
  Garbage occurred when Playing the video in the Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/yelp/+bug/1804786/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1815290] Re: Qu'est-ce que la touche « Super » ?

2019-02-09 Thread Doug Smythies
That is some regional publication of the help docs, I assume. We know
nothing about it and it is also obsolete (17.04 is past EOL (End Of
life). That page has been deleted in recent releases. I would suggest
you use this link instead:

https://help.ubuntu.com/16.04/ubuntu-help/windows-key.html

which will respond in your preferred language.


** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815290

Title:
  Qu'est-ce que la touche « Super » ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1815290/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1752215] Re: Server - LAMP installation no longer asks for a mysql password

2018-12-29 Thread Doug Smythies
** Changed in: serverguide
 Assignee: bourne (lahpo) => Doug Smythies (dsmythies)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1752215

Title:
  Server - LAMP installation no longer asks for a mysql password

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/serverguide/+bug/1752215/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1805698] Re: Thanks for nothing

2018-11-28 Thread Doug Smythies
We are just simple overloaded volunteers here. Venting your frustration here 
doesn't help.
 

** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1805698

Title:
  Thanks for nothing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1805698/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1804786] Re: Garbage occurred when Playing the video in the Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2018-11-23 Thread Doug Smythies
@Gunnar: I do see "WebKitWebProcess" using the most CPU during video
play.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804786

Title:
  Garbage occurred when Playing the video in the Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-getting-started-docs/+bug/1804786/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1804786] Re: Garbage occurred when Playing the video in the Ubuntu Desktop Guide

2018-11-23 Thread Doug Smythies
On my desktop 18.04 computer this happens for all the videos that I have
tried (3 of the 5 so far).

And yes, the web versions seem to work fine, which suggest to me that
this is a yelp problem and not a docs problem.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804786

Title:
  Garbage occurred when Playing the video in the Ubuntu Desktop Guide

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-getting-started-docs/+bug/1804786/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1794230] Re: failed to load kdump kernel

2018-09-25 Thread Doug Smythies
I get the same on my 16.04 test server.

However, things seems to work fine, if I allocate enough memory, on my
test 18.04 server VM (which runs on the aforementioned 16.04 test
server).

My real purpose here is to update the Ubuntu serverguide to deal with
bug 1769130.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1794230

Title:
  failed to load kdump kernel

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kexec-tools/+bug/1794230/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1784494] Re: HTML5 Audio NOT Analog Stereo When Analog Stereo Selected

2018-07-30 Thread Doug Smythies
This is not an Ubuntu docs issue.

** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1784494

Title:
  HTML5 Audio NOT Analog Stereo When Analog Stereo Selected

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-docs/+bug/1784494/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >