[Bug 1828467] Re: [sru] remove juju-db stop/start service interactions

2019-11-14 Thread Eric Desrochers
[VERIFICATION BIONIC] # pidof mongod 975 # service juju-db status Active: active (running) since Thu 2019-11-14 16:59:56 UTC; 9min ago Main PID: 975 (mongod) # sosreport -o juju # pidof mongod 975 # service juju-db status Active: active (running) since Thu 2019-11-14 16:59:56 UTC; 9min ago

[Bug 1828467] Re: [sru] remove juju-db stop/start service interactions

2019-11-14 Thread Eric Desrochers
[VERIFICATION BIONIC] # pidof mongod 975 # sosreport -o juju # pidof mongod 975 No mongod restart observed, all good. - Eric ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1825010] Re: [sru] Update sosreport to 3.8

2019-11-12 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Cosmic) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825010 Title: [sru] Update sosreport to 3.8 To manage notifications

[Bug 1828467] Re: [sru] remove juju-db stop/start service interactions

2019-11-11 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: [Impact] The juju plugin will stop and start the juju-db service during data collection. sosreport should not impact running services, or attempt to recover them. This has been reported upstream[0] and will be fixed by the juju 2.x refactor[1] This is

[Bug 1828467] Re: [sru] remove juju-db stop/start service interactions

2019-11-11 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Trusty) Assignee: Dan Hill (hillpd) => (unassigned) ** Description changed: [Impact] The juju plugin will stop and start the juju-db service during data collection. sosreport should not impact running services, or attempt to recover them. This

[Bug 1828467] Re: [sru] remove juju-db stop/start service interactions

2019-11-11 Thread Eric Desrochers
Uploaded in E/D/B/X. - Eric ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Low => Medium ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Low => Medium ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Disco) Importance: Low => Medium ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Eoan) Importance:

[Bug 1828467] Re: [sru] remove juju-db stop/start service interactions

2019-11-11 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu) Assignee: Dan Hill (hillpd) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Cosmic) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: sosreport (Ub

[Bug 1851854] Re: lua-lpeg src package (debian/) needs to be updated

2019-11-08 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: lua-lpeg (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) ** Changed in: lua-lpeg (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: lua-lpeg (Ubuntu) Importance: High => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1851854] Re: lua-lpeg src package (debian/) needs to be updated

2019-11-08 Thread Eric Desrochers
I debdiff has been proposed to debian 'lua-lpeg' package via debbugs #944360. - Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851854 Title: lua-lpeg src package (debian/) needs to be updated

[Bug 1851854] Re: lua-lpeg src package (debian/) needs to be updated

2019-11-08 Thread Eric Desrochers
A debdiff has been proposed to debian 'lua-lpeg' package via debbugs #944360. - Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851854 Title: lua-lpeg src package (debian/) needs to be updated

[Bug 1580385] Re: /usr/bin/nmap:11:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures

2019-11-08 Thread Eric Desrochers
I also reported a LP bug about the lua-lpeg modernisation: LP: https://bugs.launchpad.net/debian/+source/lua-lpeg/+bug/1851854 Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=944360 - Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 1851854] [NEW] lua-lpeg src package (debian/) needs to be updated

2019-11-08 Thread Eric Desrochers
Public bug reported: Dear Maintainer, While sponsoring a recent fix in lua-lpeg for Ubuntu. I have notice that the current package of lua-lpeg is using a deprecated debhelper compat version. v7 has been released 11 years ago. https://manpages.debian.org/testing/debhelper/debhelper.7.en.html

[Bug 1580385] Re: /usr/bin/nmap:11:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures

2019-11-08 Thread Eric Desrochers
[sts-sponsor] Sponsored for E, D, B & X. Packages are now waiting in their respectives upload queues for approval in order to start building in -proposed for the testing phase of the SRU. Thanks again Victor - Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1580385] Re: /usr/bin/nmap:11:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures

2019-11-08 Thread Eric Desrochers
Another note on the focal package of lua-lpeg ... (and this also implies to debian) the src package still uses v7 debhelper compat version which is 11 years old and obviously deprecated nowadays. I have reported a bug against lua-lpeg debian as follows:

[Bug 1580385] Re: /usr/bin/nmap:11:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures

2019-11-07 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: lua-lpeg (Ubuntu Eoan) Assignee: (unassigned) => Victor Tapia (vtapia) ** Changed in: lua-lpeg (Ubuntu Disco) Assignee: (unassigned) => Victor Tapia (vtapia) ** Changed in: lua-lpeg (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Victor Tapia (vtapia) ** Changed in:

[Bug 1580385] Re: /usr/bin/nmap:11:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures

2019-11-06 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: lua-lpeg (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580385 Title:

[Bug 1580385] Re: /usr/bin/nmap:11:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures

2019-11-06 Thread Eric Desrochers
[sts-sponsor] Sponsored in focal. # Nitpick: I have appended the changelog to add the LP bug. # Upstream project have no vcs, therefore no commit available. Upstream just release tarballs. # No merge/sync needed. Debian and Ubuntu package are already at same version level. # Since this is

[Bug 1580385] Re: /usr/bin/nmap:11:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures

2019-11-06 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: lua-lpeg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: lua-lpeg (Ubuntu) Importance: Critical => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1580385 Title:

[Bug 1580385] Re: /usr/bin/nmap:11:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures:hascaptures

2019-11-06 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: lua-lpeg (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Victor Tapia (vtapia) ** Changed in: lua-lpeg (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1840686] Re: Xenial images won't reboot if disk size is > 2TB when using GPT

2019-11-05 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) ** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1840686] Re: Xenial images won't reboot if disk size is > 2TB when using GPT

2019-11-04 Thread Eric Desrochers
Uploaded grub2-signed "Rebuild against grub2 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.23. (LP: #1840686)" ** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** Changed in: grub2-signed (Ubuntu) Assignee: Eric Desrochers (slashd) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: grub

[Bug 1840686] Re: Xenial images won't reboot if disk size is > 2TB when using GPT

2019-11-04 Thread Eric Desrochers
signed) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1840686 Title: Xenial images won't reboot if disk size is > 2TB when using GPT To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1840686] Re: Xenial images won't reboot if disk size is > 2TB when using GPT

2019-10-30 Thread Eric Desrochers
Sponsored for Xenial. The package is now waiting for SRU approval in order to start building in xenial-proposed for the testing phase of the SRU. Thanks for your contribution Matthew ! ** Tags removed: sts-sponsor sts-sponsor-slashd -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1840686] Re: Xenial images won't reboot if disk size is > 2TB when using GPT

2019-10-29 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Tags added: sts-sponsor-slashd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1840686 Title: Xenial images won't reboot if disk size is > 2TB when using GPT To manage notifications about this

[Bug 1743592] Re: NGINX fails to start/install/upgrade if IPv6 is completely disabled.

2019-10-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: Eric Desrochers (slashd) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: Eric Desrochers (slashd) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu Eoan) Assignee: Eric Desrochers (slashd) => (unassigned) *

[Bug 1838555] Re: nvme-cli 1.5 in Bionic does not support Micron NVME drives

2019-10-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
Quick update: Package reached day 21 in -proposed. We haven't been able to have someone to test the pkg using a micron nvme drive so far. We have someone willing to test, but it may takes weeks before they get access to the hardware. - Eric -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 1743592] Re: NGINX fails to start/install/upgrade if IPv6 is completely disabled.

2019-10-28 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu Eoan) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu Disco) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Won't Fix ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => Won't

[Bug 1754671] Re: Full-tunnel VPN DNS leakage regression

2019-10-26 Thread Eric Desrochers
The netplan.io (arm64) autopkgtest failure (due to timeout) has been retried today, it passed: http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/netplan.io/bionic/arm64 No more failure reported in pending sru page. - Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1743592] Re: NGINX fails to start/install/upgrade if IPv6 is completely disabled.

2019-10-26 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: [IMPACT] With current default vhost listening on IPV6, nginx won't start on fully IPV6 disabled system, expecting to connect to a IPV6 socket on port 80. # nginx -t nginx: the configuration file /etc/nginx/nginx.conf syntax is ok ==> nginx: [emerg]

[Bug 1743592] Re: NGINX fails to start/install/upgrade if IPv6 is completely disabled.

2019-10-26 Thread Eric Desrochers
@teward, sound good I'll let you drive the focal upload since you were already in the middle of it and include solution #1 in it. For the SRU, I'll take care of the discussion internally, and will keep the bug updated on the outcome. Eric ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Assignee: Eric

[Bug 1831448] Re: adcli: not adding an additional service-name

2019-10-26 Thread Eric Desrochers
Current active devel release (Future next LTS), now introduced a newer version of adcli: adcli | 0.9.0-1 | focal/universe | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x ** Also affects: adcli (Ubuntu Focal) Importance: Undecided Status: Won't Fix ** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu

[Bug 1848828] Re: report packages from security pocket

2019-10-25 Thread Eric Desrochers
Simon and I are working on delivering a more recent lds-client codebase (ofc including the code to fix this particular bug) and modernising the actual src package (e.g. compat v7 to v12) for focal. Once everything is found in focal-release, we will SRU PR#57 and PR#70 into stable releases. -

[Bug 1825010] Re: [sru] Update sosreport to 3.8

2019-10-25 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: sosreport (Ubuntu Focal) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825010 Title: [sru] Update sosreport to 3.8 To manage

[Bug 1743592] Re: NGINX fails to start/install/upgrade if IPv6 is completely disabled.

2019-10-23 Thread Eric Desrochers
ration file accordingly during install/configure. This issue happens regardless of the 'supported' operating system status or not, and is a core NGINX package issue, but also a core 'incompatible configuration' issue with systems which disable IPv6. ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu Eoa

[Bug 1743592] Re: NGINX fails to start/install/upgrade if IPv6 is completely disabled.

2019-10-23 Thread Eric Desrochers
U scenario #1 into Ubuntu. I'll give debian maintainer team a week or so before. - Eric ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Assignee: Thomas Ward (teward) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) ** Changed in: nginx (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Also affects: nginx (Ubuntu

[Bug 1743592] Re: NGINX fails to start/install/upgrade if IPv6 is completely disabled.

2019-10-23 Thread Eric Desrochers
So IMHO there is 2 ways to fix this: (1) - We remove the ipv6 listen from the vhost (just like Centos/Upstream does atm) # nginx.vh.default.conf server { listen 80; server_name localhost; So as upstream nginx: https://github.com/nginx/nginx/blob/master/conf/nginx.conf#L36 This

[Bug 1848828] Re: report packages from security pocket

2019-10-22 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: landscape-client (Ubuntu Eoan) Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Poirier (simpoir) ** Changed in: landscape-client (Ubuntu Disco) Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Poirier (simpoir) ** Changed in: landscape-client (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Poirier

[Bug 1838246] Re: Nginx 1.14.0 fails to start if ipv6 support on host is disabled

2019-10-21 Thread Eric Desrochers
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1743592 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1743592 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #942817 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942817 ** Also affects: nginx (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942817

[Bug 1743592] Re: NGINX fails to start/install/upgrade if IPv6 is completely disabled.

2019-10-21 Thread Eric Desrochers
Debian proposal patch: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=2;bug=942817;filename=0001-Allow-nginx-to-start-on-ipv6-disabled-system.patch;msg=15 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1743592] Re: NGINX fails to start/install/upgrade if IPv6 is completely disabled.

2019-10-21 Thread Eric Desrochers
Debian bug discussion: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942817 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #942817 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942817 ** Also affects: nginx (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=942817

[Bug 1840347] Re: Ceph 12.2.12 restarts services during upgrade

2019-10-21 Thread Eric Desrochers
[VERIFICATION QUEENS] * Before upgrade #pidof ceph-osd 22291 * After upgrade #pidof ceph-osd 26937 This is the expected behaviour, osd didn't restart ON nor AFTER upgrade, which now leave the decision to the sysadmin of the ceph cluster to decide when the daemons restart will happen via

[Bug 1848828] Re: report packages from security pocket

2019-10-18 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: [Impact] I report this bug to add the necessary bit into lds-client for all affected/supported releases. [Test Case] * One must use Landscape server on-prem (version >=19.01) or hosted which already contain the necessary server side change. - * Install

[Bug 1848828] Re: report packages from security pocket

2019-10-18 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: - It appears that the landscape-client change[0] which reports pocket info - (supported Landscape server version >=19.01 which already handle that - part) never got released to SRU. + [Impact] I report this bug to add the necessary bit into lds-client for all

[Bug 1848828] [NEW] report packages from security pocket

2019-10-18 Thread Eric Desrochers
Public bug reported: [Impact] I report this bug to add the necessary bit into lds-client for all affected/supported releases. [Test Case] * One must use Landscape server on-prem (version >=19.01) or hosted which already contain the necessary server side change. * Install landscape-client *

[Bug 1825010] Re: [sru] Update sosreport to 3.8

2019-10-18 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: [Impact] sosreport 3.8 has been released including further enhancements in core sosreport functionality: https://github.com/sosreport/sos/releases/tag/3.8 It would be great to find sosreport v3.8 in supported stable releases, considering the fact that the

[Bug 1848210] Re: ghostscript: ensure update of cups-filter

2019-10-16 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Tags removed: sts-sponsor-slashd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848210 Title: ghostscript: ensure update of cups-filter To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1848210] Re: ghostscript: ensure update of cups-filter

2019-10-16 Thread Eric Desrochers
$ pull-lp-source cups-filters xenial debian/control: . Package: cups-filters Architecture: any Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, cups-filters-core-drivers (>= ${binary:Version}), bc, ghostscript (>= 9.02~), imagemagick (>= 6.4~), poppler-utils $ pull-lp-source

[Bug 1848210] Re: ghostscript: ensure update of cups-filter

2019-10-16 Thread Eric Desrochers
$ pull-lp-source cups-filters xenial debian/control: . Package: cups-filters Architecture: any Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, cups-filters-core-drivers (>= ${binary:Version}), bc, ghostscript (>= 9.02~), imagemagick (>= 6.4~), poppler-utils $ pull-lp-source

[Bug 1848210] Re: ghostscript: ensure update of cups-filter

2019-10-15 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Tags added: sts-sponsor-slashd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848210 Title: ghostscript: ensure update of cups-filter To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1848210] Re: ghostscript: ensure update of cups-filter

2019-10-15 Thread Eric Desrochers
I will be more favourable to do the other way around by adding a "Depends:" in cups-filters package for ghostscript version "X" ? Especially if cups-filters always needs ghostscript ? It will force ghostscript to get updated instead of making the package install to fails/breaks. At least it's

[Bug 1848210] Re: ghostscript: ensure update of cups-filter

2019-10-15 Thread Eric Desrochers
I will be more favourable to do the other way around by adding a "Depends:" in cups-filters package for ghostscript version "X" ? Especially if cups-filters always needs ghostscript ? "Depends: ghostscript (>= CUPS_FILTER_VERSION)" to force ghostscript to get updated instead of making the

[Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-10-15 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Tags removed: sts-sponsor-slashd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842437 Title: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev To manage

[Bug 1847924] Re: Introduce broken state parsing to mdadm

2019-10-15 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Also affects: mdadm (Ubuntu Ff-series) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Ff-series) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu Ff-series) Assignee: (unassigned) => Guilherme G. Piccoli (gpiccoli) ** Changed in: mdadm (Ubuntu

[Bug 1847544] Re: backport: S3 policy evaluated incorrectly

2019-10-11 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Tags added: sts ** Description changed: + [Impact] + + [Test Case] + + + [Regression Potential] + + + [Other Info] + + + [Original Description] Backport Ceph issue 38638 to Luminous. If a user different from the owner (or even an anonymous user) does a GetObject/HeadObject

[Bug 1846138] Re: backport mod_reqtimeout with handshake support

2019-10-10 Thread Eric Desrochers
[VERIFICATION XENIAL - Part 2] * Feedback #3: " I also tested and now it works perfectly, I can count the seconds which I configure for the handshake timeout and the connection is terminated exactly when the handshake timeout expires Great job! " -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1846138] Re: backport mod_reqtimeout with handshake support

2019-10-10 Thread Eric Desrochers
[VERIFICATION XENIAL] * Feedback #1: >From an impacted user: " They confirmed that from their perspective the test is OK, and the apache2 packages are delivering expected result " * Feedback #2: >From SustEng Mauricio (mfo): " The backport in xenial-proposed worked exactly as eoan (with the

[Bug 1846138] Re: backport mod_reqtimeout with handshake support

2019-10-08 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: [Impact] When running TCP Defensics suite which sends corrupt packages towards vip__public port 443, the suite is hanging after the half suite because there are no free connections. The connections will be in state "established" ~ 2 hours. 1.2. Detailed

[Bug 1846138] Re: backport mod_reqtimeout with handshake support

2019-10-08 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: ## DRAFT ## [Impact] When running TCP Defensics suite which sends corrupt packages towards vip__public port 443, the suite is hanging after the half suite because there are no free connections. The connections will be in state "established" ~ 2 hours.

[Bug 1846138] Re: backport mod_reqtimeout with handshake support

2019-10-08 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: ## DRAFT ## [Impact] When running TCP Defensics suite which sends corrupt packages towards vip__public port 443, the suite is hanging after the half suite because there are no free connections. The connections will be in state "established" ~ 2 hours. -

[Bug 1846138] Re: backport mod_reqtimeout with handshake support

2019-10-08 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846138 Title: backport mod_reqtimeout with handshake support To manage

[Bug 1846138] Re: backport mod_reqtimeout with handshake support

2019-10-08 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Description changed: ## DRAFT ## - [Impact] + [Impact] + + When running TCP Defensics suite which sends corrupt packages towards + vip__public port 443, the suite is hanging after the half suite because + there are no free connections. The connections will be in state + "established" ~ 2

[Bug 1846138] Re: backport mod_reqtimeout with handshake support

2019-10-08 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Disco) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1846138] Re: backport mod_reqtimeout with handshake support

2019-10-08 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu) Assignee: Jesse Williamson (chardan) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: apache2 (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Jesse Williamson (chardan) ** Description changed: - Backport the

[Bug 1846138] Re: backport mod_reqtimeout with handshake support

2019-10-07 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Also affects: apache2 (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1846138 Title: backport mod_reqtimeout with handshake support To

[Bug 1796501] Re: systemd-resolved tries to mitigate DVE-2018-0001 even if DNSSEC=yes

2019-10-04 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Tags added: sts-sponsor-ddstreet -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1796501 Title: systemd-resolved tries to mitigate DVE-2018-0001 even if DNSSEC=yes To manage notifications about

[Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-10-04 Thread Eric Desrochers
[STS-Sponsor] Sponsored in Bionic. Thanks Mauricio for your great work on this bug and the FTBFS situation. - Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842437 Title: Xenial: libblkid:

[Bug 1838555] Re: nvme-cli 1.5 in Bionic does not support Micron NVME drives

2019-10-04 Thread Eric Desrochers
[sts-sponsor] Since this is a "HWE/new feature", please read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Other_safe_cases and see if your patch fits inside the policy. Also, I would like to see more justification/testings (detailed steps, output, ...) using a micron nmve drive type, local

[Bug 1831448] Re: adcli: not adding an additional service-name

2019-10-03 Thread Eric Desrochers
A bionic-backports request has been made via LP: #1846516 ** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu Eoan) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu Disco) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => Won't Fix ** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu

[Bug 1831448] Re: adcli: not adding an additional service-name

2019-10-02 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu Eoan) Status: In Progress => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831448 Title: adcli: not adding an additional service-name To manage

[Bug 1831448] Re: adcli: not adding an additional service-name

2019-10-02 Thread Eric Desrochers
@bigon, I made the request more "official" by reporting a bug in Debian against adcli: # adcli new release 0.9.0 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941583 Regards, Eric ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #941583 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941583 **

[Bug 1838555] Re: nvme-cli 1.5 in Bionic does not support Micron NVME drives

2019-10-01 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: nvme-cli (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1838555 Title: nvme-cli 1.5 in Bionic does not support Micron NVME drives To

[Bug 1844173] Re: libwbclient-sssd package installation does not re-create expected symlink to libwbclient.so.0

2019-10-01 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #941492 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941492 ** Also affects: samba (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=941492 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 1831448] Re: adcli: not adding an additional service-name

2019-09-30 Thread Eric Desrochers
To summarise, before talking about the Ubuntu specifics, for sure the first step would be to make sure 0.9.0 (including the fixes needed for this bug) is found in debian, then we'll be more amenable to discuss further more about the Ubuntu potential options (SRU micro release, bionic-backports,

[Bug 1831448] Re: adcli: not adding an additional service-name

2019-09-30 Thread Eric Desrochers
if the "microrelease SRU" doesn't apply here, then as I stated earlier maybe bionic-backport would suits better. Let's see what Laurent says. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831448

[Bug 1831448] Re: adcli: not adding an additional service-name

2019-09-30 Thread Eric Desrochers
@bigon, Is there any plan to bump adcli (universe package) version in debian/unstable to 0.9.0 and then possibly the Ubuntu stable releases using an SRU exception (taking into account the current freeze schedule) something such as microreleases[0] with your MOTU privileges. Since you are the

[Bug 1831448] Re: adcli: not adding an additional service-name

2019-09-30 Thread Eric Desrochers
@bigon, Is there any plan to bump adcli version in debian/unstable to 0.9.0 and then possibly the Ubuntu stable releases (Xenial/Bionic/Disco/Eoan/F-Series(next development release)) using SRU exception something such as microreleases[0] with your MOTU privileges using this policy: Since you are

[Bug 1831448] Re: adcli: not adding an additional service-name

2019-09-30 Thread Eric Desrochers
Without looking further (so maybe more commits might be needed as well or not) so far the observed commits needed are : https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/realmd/adcli/commit/163730cf8c91fc8dc4f44eb1eca45daa3abf3ed8

[Bug 1831448] Re: adcli: not adding an additional service-name

2019-09-30 Thread Eric Desrochers
m). That way bionic-update will remain at "0.8.2-1" and bionic-backports could have "0.9.X". Regards, Eric [0] - https://launchpad.net/ubp [1] - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports [2] - https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports ** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu Eoan

[Bug 1831448] Re: adcli: not adding an additional service-name

2019-09-30 Thread Eric Desrochers
I'm investigating the feasibility of the patchset's backport at the moment. I'll update the bug as I make progress. Regards, Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1831448 Title:

[Bug 1831448] Re: adcli: not adding an additional service-name

2019-09-30 Thread Eric Desrochers
$ rmadison adcli adcli | 0.7.5-1 | trusty/universe | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, powerpc, ppc64el adcli | 0.8.1-1 | xenial/universe | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, powerpc, ppc64el, s390x adcli | 0.8.2-1 | bionic/universe | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x adcli

[Bug 1831448] Re: adcli: not adding an additional service-name

2019-09-27 Thread Eric Desrochers
) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu Eoan) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: adcli (Ubuntu Eoan) Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-26 Thread Eric Desrochers
@mfo, I will gladly resume the sponsoring as soon as LP: #1844504 is "Fix Released" and util-linux builds fine. Thanks for your good work on this Mauricio ! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1836635] Re: Bionic: support for Solarflare X2542 network adapter (sfc driver)

2019-09-25 Thread Eric Desrochers
Sponsored in Bionic. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1836635 Title: Bionic: support for Solarflare X2542 network adapter (sfc driver) To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1710278] Re: [2.3a1] named stuck on reload, DNS broken

2019-09-24 Thread Eric Desrochers
Additionally, any idea as of when proposed 2.6.1 (including the dns reload fix) will become available in MAAS/stable ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1710278 Title: [2.3a1] named

[Bug 1710278] Re: [2.3a1] named stuck on reload, DNS broken

2019-09-24 Thread Eric Desrochers
Additionally, any idea as of when 2.6 will become available in MAAS/stable ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1710278 Title: [2.3a1] named stuck on reload, DNS broken To manage

[Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-24 Thread Eric Desrochers
LP: #1844504 ** Tags added: ftbfs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842437 Title: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev To manage

[Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-17 Thread Eric Desrochers
@mfo, Unfortunately the build ftbfs as follow: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/443016838/buildlog_ubuntu-xenial-amd64.util-linux_2.27.1-6ubuntu3.9_BUILDING.txt.gz ... masks: script: openpty failed: No such file or directory Makefile:11211: recipe for target 'check-recursive' failed make[3]:

[Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-17 Thread Eric Desrochers
Maybe a kernel change between your successful built and my today sponsoring build failure ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842437 Title: Xenial: libblkid: fix

[Bug 1842437] Re: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev

2019-09-17 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Tags added: sts-sponsor-slashd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1842437 Title: Xenial: libblkid: fix false-positive/misdetection of nilfs2 filesystem with udev To manage

[Bug 1844173] Re: libwbclient-sssd package installation does not re-create expected symlink to libwbclient.so.0

2019-09-17 Thread Eric Desrochers
# apt-file search libwbclient.so.0 libwbclient-sssd: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sssd/modules/libwbclient.so.0 libwbclient-sssd: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/sssd/modules/libwbclient.so.0.14.0 libwbclient0: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libwbclient.so.0 libwbclient0:

[Bug 1844173] Re: libwbclient-sssd package installation does not re-create expected symlink to libwbclient.so.0

2019-09-16 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1844173 Title: libwbclient-sssd package installation does not re-create expected symlink to libwbclient.so.0 To manage

[Bug 1825010] Re: [sru] Update sosreport to 3.8

2019-09-16 Thread Eric Desrochers
series) Assignee: (unassigned) => Eric Desrochers (slashd) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1825010 Title: [sru] Update sosreport to 3.8 To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1824423] Re: Bad java class file version for collectd java plugin

2019-09-12 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: collectd (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1824423 Title: Bad java class file version for collectd java plugin To manage

[Bug 1838771] Re: http:Fix Host header in proxied https connections

2019-09-12 Thread Eric Desrochers
[VERIFICATION BIONIC] It looks good to me testing with the above [Test Case]. # apt-get update Hit:1 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security InRelease ==> Hit:2 https://packages.microsoft.com/repos/azure-cli bionic InRelease Hit:3

[Bug 1843036] Re: [regression] SNMP missing disks in hrStorageTable

2019-09-12 Thread Eric Desrochers
@Ɓukasz Zemczak (sil2100), All good on my side. - Eric -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843036 Title: [regression] SNMP missing disks in hrStorageTable To manage notifications

[Bug 1842489] Re: [ffe][sru]: Update sosreport [last] plugin

2019-09-11 Thread Eric Desrochers
[VERIFICATION XENIAL] -proposed package version: 3.6-1ubuntu0.16.04.3 # sosreport -a # tar Jxvf /tmp/sosreport--2019094236.tar.xz # ls -altr sosreport--2019094236/sos_commands/last/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Sep 10 21:25 lastlog_-u_65537-4294967295 # New behaviour to split by UID Range

[Bug 1842489] Re: [ffe][sru]: Update sosreport [last] plugin

2019-09-11 Thread Eric Desrochers
[VERIFICATION BIONIC] -proposed package version: 3.6-1ubuntu0.18.04.3 # sosreport -a # tar Jxvf /tmp/sosreport--2019093800.tar.xz # ls -altr sosreport--2019093800/sos_commands/last/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Sep 10 21:25 lastlog_-u_65537-4294967295 # New behaviour to split by UID Range

[Bug 1843036] Re: [regression] SNMP missing disks in hrStorageTable

2019-09-11 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Changed in: net-snmp (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Fix Released => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843036 Title: [regression] SNMP missing disks in hrStorageTable

[Bug 1842489] Re: [ffe][sru]: Update sosreport [last] plugin

2019-09-10 Thread Eric Desrochers
[VERIFICATION DISCO] proposed package version: 3.6-1ubuntu2.1 # sosreport -a # tar Jxvf /tmp/sreport--20190910212551.tar.xz # ls -altr sosreport--20190910212551/sos_commands/last/ -rw-r--r-- 1 root root0 Sep 10 21:25 lastlog_-u_65537-4294967295 # New behaviour to split by UID Range work

[Bug 1840348] Re: Ceph 12.2.11-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 doesn't honor suicide_grace

2019-09-10 Thread Eric Desrochers
** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1840348 Title: Ceph 12.2.11-0ubuntu0.18.04.2 doesn't honor suicide_grace To manage notifications about this bug go to:

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >