Hi, I get the absolute exact same error messages when starting chromium (to the
last letter) since the last chromium update (to Version 59.0.3071.109), which
is why you should still consider that to be a bug!
I tried downgrading and got a ton of error messages from apt, so I let that be.
I am
When is the fix out of 'proposed'? I don't want 'proposed' updates. If
I'd want that I'd install 16.10
What is the point of an LTS if these bugs can't be fixed?!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Well, alright, I tested kernel 4.4.0-72. Didn't really work for me. It's
actually not really helping, because with it Unity is broken, not all icons are
loading (workspace switcher is gone), no mouse at all. Something utterly wrong
with USB support. At least the system doesn't freeze, so I
Sorry, Joseph, a bit more information please: Which proposed kernel version
specifically? I thought this had been done before. Anyway: I activated the
Xenial proposed repository, but I can't see any kernel newer than 4.4.0-72 --
is this the version supposed to fix this issue?
To be honest,
@Alexandru: Thank you for that suggestion. I'm not willing to add a PPA
for something as important as the kernel. The whole point of having a
LTS release is that it receives updates for five years. Bugs like this
can not happen in 2017! Or at least they need to be fixed ASAP. We're
six weeks in
Is someone still working on this issue? It doesn't look like it given the
status "Fix Committed". Correct me if I'm wrong but the WiFi chipsets affected
by this bug are in widespread use and I think it is a shame that it seems to be
impossible to fix something which was demonstrably working in
Hi, unfortunately 4.4.0-69 has been withdrawn from the 16.04 repository.
(See here: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+package/linux-
tools-4.4.0-69-generic )
Additional information: 4.4.0-71 crashes with WiFi RTL8188CUS chipset
(Edimax EW-7811Un), too. Probably same driver as for RTL8192.
Incidently I have the exact same setup and my Ubuntu 10.04 installation also
exhibits the exact same behaviour. Very strange this.
I also consider this to be a usability issue.
Display resolutions are exactly the same:
1440x900 for the main (laptop-integrated) display. 1280x1024 for the external
