and then I put it in hte wrong place
** Project changed: linux => linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081685
Title:
[Ubuntu 24.04-generic Kernel-6.8]Hard lockup on 8 Socke
looks like this is now upstream according to this:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20240912232447.45607-1-justintee8...@gmail.com/T/#m0c5162512ab2bd5cabf2135596cfc64de068f3f9
in particular this patch was called out:
[PATCH 6/8] lpfc: Revise TRACE_EVENT log flag severities from KERN_ERR to
KERN
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Michael Reed (mreed8855)
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077
The author, Kenny Levinsen , provided this:
```
The issue appears filed for wlgreet 0.4.1, and looks like an issue
already fixed in 0.5.0:
https://git.sr.ht/~kennylevinsen/wlgreet/commit/7e79d6004fc5e765a5c3ece6d377f8c5999d9dfa
```
I've tested a build at head (e4a7d1f) and confirm that this resol
Will look at the next SRU cycle for this, presuming the fix is as simple
as a single patch pull back to 6.8.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077140
Title:
Intel Arrow Lake Graphics fe
Will look at the next SRU cycle for this, presuming the fix is as simple
as a single patch pull back to 6.8.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077287
Title:
Fail to locate the LED of NV
Will look at the next SRU cycle for this, presuming the fix is as simple
as a single patch pull back to 6.8.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077861
Title:
Intel Arrow Lake IBECC featu
Per upstream this is expected behaviour, if not a bit verbose or
improperly worded. They will eventually dial back the language to make
it less worrying.
justin.tee 2024-08-19 20:36:55 UTC
(In reply to justin.tee from comment #9)
> (In reply to Xavier from comment #8)
> > Created attachment 306743
** Package changed: kernel-package (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077861
T
** Also affects: kernel-package (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Package changed: kernel-package (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2
Public bug reported:
I've tried starting greetd using the config installed by default and the
config as modified by the docs. I've tried to start it by saying this
at the console before starting sway:
$ sudo systemctl start greetd
/etc/greetd/config.toml says
> command = "sway --config /etc/gr
Public bug reported:
On starting urxvt, it appears to assume a 24 line window and put the
first prompt 23 lines above the bottom. Whereas my window renders as 91
lines of text.
I would expect the first prompt to appear at top of window, regardless
of window size. This was the behaviour before 2
Sorry, the 6.10 for 24.10 is currently in -proposed so you'll need to
enable the -proposed repo and install linux-image-generic which sho9uld
install 6.10. But if upstream 6.10 works, then most likely our proposed
6.10 will as well. It's worth checking just to be sure.
you can also install and use
Just to make sure I understand the instructions on using mainline and
grub-customizer:
I am currently at 6.8.0-39-generic #39-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC and
you want me to revert to "Ubuntu, with Linux 6.7.10-060710-generic",
correct?
I have done as you suggest and am about to reboot. It's been
Looks like it works:
$ sudo apt list | grep linux-raspi
WARNING: apt does not have a stable CLI interface. Use with caution in scripts.
...
linux-raspi-headers-6.8.0-1008/noble-updates,noble-security,now 6.8.0-1008.8
arm64 [installed,automatic]
linux-raspi-headers-6.8.0-1009/noble-proposed,now 6
Public bug reported:
Hi,
It would be great if Raspberry Pi kernels could enable BTF. It's not
enabled at the moment:
$ ls /sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux
ls: cannot access '/sys/kernel/btf/vmlinux': No such file or directory
I think the minimal change is to add CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO_BTF=y and the
default k
Just to be clear also, can you retry this on the latest 24.04 daily
image, and also on 24.10 and see if the same thing happens on either of
these? This was first reported pre-release and there have been many
overall updates since then, so lets check the current images just to be
sure this is, indee
Currently there is no support for installing on iSCSI disks. There are
no current plans to do add iSCSI support in the installer, however, lets
keep the bug open as it is (as a Wishlist) item as we may pick it up in
the future.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
Does this happen on 6.10 (24.10 daily image)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070339
Title:
[Lenovo Ubuntu 24.04 Bug] dmesg show "spi-nor: probe of spi0.0 failed
with error -95"
To
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073571
Title:
[Lenovo Ubuntu 24.04 Bug] lpfc driver reports failure message
To manage n
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061373
Title:
[Len
** Package changed: ubuntu => stress-ng
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069674
Title:
Stress Tests failed during Server Certification test
To manage notifications about this bug go t
Hi Ranjan,
please confirm the following:
1: What kernel version you want this to land in. 22.04.5 has two
different kernel versions.
2: THese are ALL the necessary commit IDs, there are no missing
requisite commits in this list.
3: These are all clean cherry picks into the target kernel versio
This also breaks the golang `go tool cover -html` command, which creates
an HTML file in `/tmp` and opens it using `xdg-open`, and Firefox can't
find the file.
See https://github.com/golang/go/issues/68343
** Bug watch added: github.com/golang/go/issues #68343
https://github.com/golang/go/issu
** Changed in: gnome-calendar (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Opinion
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1915468
Title:
calendar should have a button in its top bar
To manage notificatio
** Bug watch added: bugzilla.gnome.org/ #762724
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762724
** Changed in: gnome-calendar
Importance: Medium => Unknown
** Changed in: gnome-calendar
Status: Fix Released => Unknown
** Changed in: gnome-calendar
Remote watch: GNOME Bug Tracker
This was fixed in version 43-44 and newer.
** Changed in: gnome-calendar (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948556
Title:
calendar has low co
AFAIK this was fixed in versions 43-44 or so. Try version 46.
** Changed in: gnome-calendar (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1551776
Title
This was fixed in versions 45-46.
** Changed in: gnome-calendar (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843910
Title:
cannot add public (unauthent
Shouldn't happen in recent versions, at least based on comments
upstream.
** Changed in: gnome-calendar (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues #160
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues/160
** Also affects: gnome-calendar via
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues/160
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received th
** Bug watch added: gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues #160
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues/160
** Also affects: gnome-calendar via
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-calendar/-/issues/160
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received th
PHP ext/mailparse also removed the use of `mbfl` in version 3.1.5
(2023-07-27), but Ubuntu 24.04 ships version 3.1.4 (2022-09-15).
https://pecl.php.net/package-
changelog.php?package=mailparse&release=3.1.5
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
PHP removed the `mbfl_name2no_encoding` symbol in this 8.3.0rc1 commit:
https://github.com/php/php-src/commit/a85adb170cf831e742c4be2333c886d054ca738c
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067
bladernr@galactica:~/development/kernels/upstream/mainline$ git describe
3ac1d14d0583a
v6.7-2-g3ac1d14d0583
So we will have to also pull this back to Mantic as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
Thanks Kim,
When you say 22.04, I presume this means 22.04 GA kernel (or 5.15)?
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Mantic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because yo
I had mentioned this in the meeting last time, but don't seen an update
here... but a couple things:
1:IIRC this is the latest generation server and XCC with the latest XCC
and UEFI firmware. Does this ALSO happen on the last generation
hardware with older versions of XCC and UEFI firmware?
2. O
The tricky part for me is that client was regularly changing, so I can't
confidently say when did errors start appearing, it's just very
suspicious that it needs high load (as new host and higher network
bandwidth made the issue more frequent), and uploading to the server as
just pure downloading d
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060437
Title:
The
Public bug reported:
error during update
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: linux-modules-nvidia-470-6.5.0-27-generic 6.5.0-27.28~22.04.1+2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-28.29~22.04.1-generic 6.5.13
Uname: Linux 6.5.0-28-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_mode
Another workaround:
On jammy I am able to use `pbuilder-dist noble amd64 build myproject.dsc`
without the warning prompt if I first make a symlink:
```
cd /usr/share/debootstrap/scripts
sudo ln -s gutsy noble
```
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whic
I was about to file a new one, and then I rediscovered the one that
still describes the remaining problem: bug #99112
It was a bit difficult to find, so I will update its metadata a bit to
relate to this. I'll leave you to decide whether its importance/priority
should be bumped from "low" to "high
** Attachment added: "rpc_tasks.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2062568/+attachment/5770302/+files/rpc_tasks.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062568
Oh fun, trying to add multiple attachments, I just ended up finding a
bug report from 2007 complaining about apport being able to do this, but
the web interface is limited, so guess I'll get a bit spammy.
Ran into the same as usual again, even with avoiding heavy utilization.
Not seeing anything t
** Attachment added: "nfs_threads.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/+bug/2062568/+attachment/5770301/+files/nfs_threads.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062
While I'm not fully familiar with how things are done here, is it really
sensible that the "Fix Released" status prevents search on the main page
from even finding this issue?
We aren't far from the upstream fixes being available for a week already
without any of the supported releases of Ubuntu g
I suspect it's not necessarily related to the card model, but just in
case that is relevant, could you provide the model of the mellanox card
you're using?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Is this still happening with the latest images?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061373
Title:
[Lenovo Ubuntu 24.04 Bug] Print grub message before the uefi POST
screen disappears in
** Also affects: subiquity (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060924
Title:
[Lenovo Ubuntu 24.04 Bug] Can not detect iscsi disk stora
Ran into this again just hours after commenting by attempting to unpack a large
archive file. Apparently the new setup of higher performance host with more
network bandwidth is just too overwhelming to be usable with NFS with this
issue.
Reading alone still seems to be fine though.
Torturing 50
This kind of issue appeared with Ubuntu 23.10 for me on the server
mostly using an HDD for bulk storage with a not exactly powerful CPU
also being occupied with using WireGuard to secure the NFS connection.
Mentioning the performance details because I have a feeling they matter. An
also not exact
Can confirm the principle of least surprise being violated here. It took me
getting a permission error trying to replace a file to test a bugfix to realize
that:
- Commands without explicit permission elevation do system-wide modifications
- A theoretically user level setup is not fully covered b
Covering just Noble isn't really enough with Mantic and Jammy still providing
vulnerable packages according to the advisory listing affected versions as:
- < 1.10.9
- 1.12.x < 1.12.9
- 1.14.x < 1.14.6
- 1.15.x < 1.15.8
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Public bug reported:
Using Ubuntu 23.10, gave OpenSnitch 1.5.8.1-1ubuntu0.1 a try which initially
looked fine, but then started getting I/O errors apparently due to an NFS
server no longer being reachable.
Still continued to play with it for a while, including doing a reinstall to see
if it cha
Hi Matthew,
Its no problem, I can see how changing the version negotiation would be
tricky, thanks for looking at it so quickly.
Using the workaround and everything working correctly, no dramas
Thanks again,
Jeffrey
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Can you confirm, the issue is summarized as thus:
1: NO network cable connected, installation is successful
2: Network cable connected and internet is available, installation is successful
3: Network cable connected, network is available, INTERNET is unavailable
(airgapped lab), installation fails
Public bug reported:
ubuntu software ubuntu-jammy-main (deb)
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: bind9-host 1:9.18.18-0ubuntu0.22.04.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-26.26~22.04.1-generic 6.5.13
Uname: Linux 6.5.0-26-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nv
Public bug reported:
Hello,
On Ubuntu Server 20.04.6 LTS with the update of nfs-common package =>
"nfs-common/focal-updates 1:1.3.4-2.5ubuntu3.5" to "nfs-common/focal-
updates 1:1.3.4-2.5ubuntu3.6" I started having issues mounting ntf4.0
volumes. The NFS server supports 4.0, 4.1 and 4.2
The issu
Something in a recent dnsmasq update broke KVM. I hit the same and found
a workaround that gets me rolling again wtih KVM guests at least
here's a quick shell summary:
bladernr@galactica:~$ sudo virsh net-start default
error: Failed to start network default
error: internal error: Child process
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055776
Title:
After updating ubuntu, the network to which the subnet address is
assigned does not become active in KVM.
To manage notifications about
So after we talked on MM, I think maybe you and Simon have been testing
this instead, so for now is do I need to do this?
Thanks
Jeff
On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 3:10 PM Sergio Durigan Junior <
2012...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Thanks for the offer. Actually there i
Hi Sergio, is there anything we can help with testing here?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2012763
Title:
qemu-system-amd64 max cpus is too low for latest processors
To manage notifi
Closing, this is an old bug and this support likely landed long ago.
** Changed in: dellserver
Status: In Progress => Invalid
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Bionic)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this b
** Package changed: checkbox (Ubuntu) => maas
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2057745
Title:
Failed to query node's BMC - >
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.
contents of /var/crash attached
** Attachment added: "crash.tgz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/2055418/+attachment/5752934/+files/crash.tgz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
@crish it doesn't appear to like that command:
$ sudo apport-cli -u 2055418 -c /var/crash/*.crash
Usage: apport-cli [options] [symptom|pid|package|program path|.apport/.crash
file]
apport-cli: error: -u/--update-bug option cannot be used together with
options for a new report
--
You received t
Release EOL
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu Quantal)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to a duplicate bug report (1124282).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49579
Title:
screen doesn't loc
Release EOL
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu Wily)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to a duplicate bug report (338057).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49579
Title:
screen doesn't lock wh
Release EOL
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Quantal)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to a duplicate bug report (1124282).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49579
Title:
screen doesn't lock when
Release EOL
** Changed in: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Wily)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to a duplicate bug report (371388).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49579
Title:
screen doesn't lock when som
Release EOL
** Changed in: unity (Ubuntu Wily)
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to a duplicate bug report (338057).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49579
Title:
screen doesn't lock when some menu
Release EOL
** Also affects: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu Quantal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: gnome-shell (Ubuntu Quantal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: unity (Ubuntu Quantal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affec
For the record I was sure to clear (and check they were gone) all
libvirt rules between tests using iptables-restore
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971619
Title:
forward mode open is
Thank you for checking!
It seems I will need to retest versions, i was simply checking if it added ANY
libvirt rules (iptables-save|grep -i virt), as we expected "open" to NOT add
any firewall rules. I was not checking for specific libvirt rules.
--
You received this bug notification because yo
** Changed in: mcelog (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972149
Title:
"mcelog --client" cannot ouput after performing PFA test on Ubunt22.0
** Tags added: servcert-359
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965241
Title:
Ubuntu 22.04 and 20.04 DPC Fixes for Failure Cases of DownPort
Containment events
To manage notifications
Hi Sujith - Can you update this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934620
Title:
NVIDIA A100-80GB GPU fails to initialize in R750xa, BAR Address setup
failed if SR-IOV is disabled
Thank you for the reply. I am certain that I removed the rules between
each test. I agree that it could be a different package, I better go
through my dpkg log and figure out whats going on here. Is there any way
somebody could confirm that they do not see this?
--
You received this bug notificat
Public bug reported:
This bug reporting process is very cumbersome. I tried using the update-
bug application but none of the available options were relevant. If I
selected other, I was forced to select a package. How am I supposed to
know what package the bug is in? So I just picked one so I coul
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971151
Title:
[Ubuntu 22.04.1] mpi3mr: Add management application interface(BSG)
It seems to be present all the way back to 6.0.0-0ubuntu2 which isas far as i
could find in an old changelog... is it possible im not rolling the proper
packages back?
I have been rolling back these debs:
libvirt0_6.0.0-0ubuntu2_amd64.deb
libvirt-daemon-driver-qemu_6.0.0-0ubuntu2_amd64.deb
libvi
I found it was 6.0.0-0ubuntu8 and I am triggering the bug even while
that version is installed, which feels wrong... How would I be the first
to notice this after 2 years? it seems unlikely, but here we are
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
Thank you for the instructions on how to test old versions. I was wrong
above when i said it was not present in 8.8, indeed it was but I had not
noticed it until more recently. I have tested back to 8.1 and I confirm
it was there as well. I am unable to get/test 8.0 and i do not know what
the versi
This bug definitely did not exist in 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.8
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971619
Title:
forward mode open is adding libvirt iptables rules
To manage notifications about t
I was able to confirm this bug exists in 6.0.0-0ubuntu8.15 as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971619
Title:
forward mode open is adding libvirt iptables rules
To manage notific
I also filed this bug directly with the libvirt team at:
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/307
** Bug watch added: gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues #307
https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt/-/issues/307
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Public bug reported:
After "auto security updates" updated my libvirt I have noticed that
forward mode open is adding LIBVIRT rules to my iptables for the default
network. This was supposed to happen with forward mode nat, but not with
forward mode open.
apt-cache policy libvirt-daemon:
libvirt-d
If we get a customer with issues with this on Focal, we can revisit
this, but now that 22.04 is out with a version of nvme-cli that is not
affected, this is less likely to get sponsored otherwise.
** Changed in: nvme-cli (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: New => Invalid
** Changed in: nvme-cli (Ubuntu
Thanks @mfo! That is correct, the crash was seen there, but they
determined it was generic and are pushing this to all the Linux OSVs.
Also of note, that patch set is a general driver update and not all of those
are relevant to this bug, I've asked them to pinpoint the patches that resolve
this
** Tags added: servcert-343
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971151
Title:
[Ubuntu 22.04.1] mpi3mr: Add management application interface(BSG)
support
To manage notifications about t
** Tags added: servcert-345
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1971193
Title:
Server Crash while running IO and switch port bounce test with 2K
login session
To manage notifications ab
Hi Sumit,
Can you file a separate bug for these new patches? The original patch set
has been pulled and is in the process of being included in a kernel update
and at this point these should be part of a new request.
On Sun, May 1, 2022 at 20:16 Sumit Saxena <1967...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
>
>Having lower latency media does seem like a valid workaround but, IMO,
high-latency media is a significant enough use case that we should try
and support it. I don't know that we can expect users to all have
systems "next door" to their install targets to use for media hosting.
Fair enough. All I
One more comment, I cannot reproduce this. To test, I installed Ubuntu
Desktop 20.04 LTS onto a SR645 in a rack in my DC. I then accessed that
desktop, opened Firefox, and accessed the XCC on a SR670 V2. I mounted
the ISO image using local media, and was able to boot the SR670 V2 using
an ISO mou
OK, so it works via remote media if you mount it locally using NFS.
And does the same hold true for the 20.04.4 LTS Server Live ISO, and the
21.10 Server Live ISO?
And can you install a desktop environment on a server next to the SR650
and on the same switch, rather than your laptop, and see if y
Poked the Kernel Team to see if someone could take a look at this one.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968519
Title:
[Lenovo Ubuntu 22.04 Bug]The Physical VGA displayer shows no signa
Given it took so long, are you sure you're not hitting some timeout
that's unmounting the ISO?
And can you put the ISO somewhere closer to the server? I've had success
sharing it on an NFS share local to the server and mounting that via the
XCC.
--
You received this bug notification because you
I can confirm that the issue may be in qemu in 22.04. A "real" s390x
running 22.04 does not have this issue and the same installation image
does not have this issue running on Windows 11, qemu version 7.0.0.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Also, per your Comment #10 you have gone from teh ISO to PXE booting
which are two different things... Have you tried this in MAAS? Does
MAAS see the IB devices when commissioning, and can you deploy using the
IB device to PXE via MAAS?
** Description changed:
+ SUMMARY: Jammy ISO is not loadin
Is it possible to drop to a shell during the install and run `apport-
collect 1968716` before you add the rdma-core and ib_ipoib modules?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1968716
Title:
1 - 100 of 8566 matches
Mail list logo
