Why is this marked as "fix released"? It's still broken on Ubuntu 20.04 LTS,
the fix has not been released into it.
At the very least, the behavior does not match what is described in the
sshd_config man page. Nowhere does it mention that Match blocks don't work
inside Include files. Not only
TJ's howto from comment #47 is much better as it allows installing
directly to the target disk, mine needs you to install it to a second
disk and copies over to the target disk.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
By the way, PureOS has the same bug, so I think it goes all the way up to
Debian.
Here's a guide I created on how to move a unencrypted install to fully
encrypted (works with Ubuntu as well):
https://github.com/jjakob/wiki/wiki/Migrating-an-unencrypted-PureOS-
Debian-install-to-fully-encrypted
My attempts to install 20.04 beta desktop or 18.04 LTS netinstall expert
mode with full disk LUKS encryption failed.
1. Tried installing 20.04 Desktop ISO:
- selected manual partitioning
- created a single partition spanning the entire disk
- created a volume for encryption on the partition
Still not fixed in Xenial/16.04LTS.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/617101
Title:
package g15daemon 1.9.5.3-8ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: if
g15daemon fails to start
Public bug reported:
The following warning is printed when bringing up network interfaces. It
seems to have no effect on system operation.
[ 17.731877] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device eth3
[ 17.732141] bonding: bond0: enslaving eth3 as a backup interface with a down
link.
[
Still getting this bug in Trusty.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393842
Title:
libvirt does not grant qemu-guest-agent channel perms
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1642966 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1642966
Public bug reported:
This is otherwise a duplicate of #1642966, but for a different version
of cups 2.1.3-4ubuntu0.1
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: cups-daemon 2.1.3-4ubuntu0.1
Happened right now on Xenial 16.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1302416
Title:
deja-dup monitor was taking 6GB of memory
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
Currently, using LZ4 as compression type produces an unbootable system, as lz4
is called without the legacy format option -l, which is required to produce a
kernel readable image.
Also, using lzop there is a very long delay (over one minute) when updating
initramfs, as by
Any news on fixing the bug?
Yesterday a new version of network-manager 0.9.8.8-0ubuntu7.2 got pushed out,
replacing the version from cschieli's ppa 0.9.8.8-0ubuntu7.1+athome1, causing
the bridges to break once again
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1355732 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1355732
Public bug reported:
The error occurred when upgrading to 14.04 LTS enablement stack.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: virtualbox-dkms 4.1.12-dfsg-2ubuntu0.6
ProcVersionSignature:
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290110
Title:
Fan stops after resume from suspend leading to overheating;
For me this bug is definitely fixed in 3.15-rc6, and AFAIK from this release
onwards, so daily build of mainline should also work. Of course the patch is
not yet backported, which it urgently must be. For now just install latest
mainline from instructions on Ubuntu wiki.
If there is still a
I mean the kernel, of course. There is no need to reinstall Ubuntu 14.04
daily (in fact it would be pointless as the bug is still there). I've
had it since alpha and it works fine with kernel 3.15-rc6 installed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
** Tags removed: kernel-bug-exists-upstream kernel-bug-reported-upstream
** Tags added: kernel-fixed-upstream kernel-fixed-upstream-3.15-rc6
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290110
The bug is fixed in 3.15-rc6. The patch is at
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/4124871/ and a patch adapted for
3.14.4 is here: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=136881
A backport to 3.13 is needed for it to get into Trusty AFAIK...
--
You received this bug notification because
Changed URL to HTTPS
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #71711
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71711
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290110
Title:
Fan stops
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #71711
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71711
** Also affects: linux via
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=71711
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Tags added: kernel-bug-reported-upstream
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1290110
Title:
Fan stops after resume from suspend leading to overheating; requires
reboot to fix [HP
I have the same problem, but oddly enough in Chromium - LibreOffice is OK. So I
don't think this is related to LibreOffice.
This only happens when maximised.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Thank you. I will report the bug upstream.
I have done a bit of investigation on which cooling devices correspond to
different fan speeds. IMO the cooling device to trip point mappings are wrong
(do not change fan speed linearly with accordance to temperature/trip points).
And I've also found
Hi,
I haven't had any problems with wireless for a while now... I think things just
started working after a upgrade a bit after I posted this bug. I can't remember
when exactly it was (maybe a couple of months).
So if you're having problems, I suggest you open a new bug...
--
You received
Hi,
I've tested the latest mainline kernel (v3.16-rc6-trusty) and the bug is
still present. Also it seems that the fan speed does not change relative
to temperature any more after OS startup.
** Tags added: kernel-bug-exists-upstream
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete =
Public bug reported:
After resume from suspend, the fan (there is only one) first speeds up to about
a normal speed and then slows down in a couple of seconds to a complete stop.
It doesn't spin up again even if the temperatures shoot way up (monitoring
using indicator-sensors or lm-sensors,
** Attachment added: /sys/class/thermal after resume, fan doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1290110/+attachment/4015418/+files/sys-class-thermal-aftersuspend
** Summary changed:
- Fan stops after resume from suspend leading to overheating; requires reboot
to
Exact same problem here. Only APT is set to use the proxy in
/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/01proxy:
Acquire::http::Proxy http://apt-cacher.lan:3142/;;
System-wide proxy is disabled.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Also relevant:
http://www.mail-archive.com/nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org/msg07865.html
Looks like I'll need a newer version of NUT anyway...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
Also relevant:
http://www.mail-archive.com/nut-upsuser@lists.alioth.debian.org/msg07865.html
Looks like I'll need a newer version of NUT anyway...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I am confirming HW compatibility for AP9619 (AP9617, AP9618, AP9619
series).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to nut in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1197878
Title:
SNMPv3 not working with APC
To manage
Sorry, but these cards don't support AES, only DES
(AP9617,AP9618,AP9619).
I have managed to fix the communication problem by using simple passwords
without any special characters.
upsdrvctl still outputs some unhandled ASNs, but it seems to have no influence
on NUT working.
This is with mibs
Sorry, but these cards don't support AES, only DES
(AP9617,AP9618,AP9619).
I have managed to fix the communication problem by using simple passwords
without any special characters.
upsdrvctl still outputs some unhandled ASNs, but it seems to have no influence
on NUT working.
This is with mibs
I am confirming HW compatibility for AP9619 (AP9617, AP9618, AP9619
series).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1197878
Title:
SNMPv3 not working with APC
To manage notifications about
After some digging I found someone having an identical problem on the
nut-upsdev mailing lists:
http://www.mail-archive.com/nut-upsdev@lists.alioth.debian.org/msg03451.html
The problem was ultimately not resolved, hence I deem that the status could be
elevated to Confirmed.
--
You received
After some digging I found someone having an identical problem on the
nut-upsdev mailing lists:
http://www.mail-archive.com/nut-upsdev@lists.alioth.debian.org/msg03451.html
The problem was ultimately not resolved, hence I deem that the status could be
elevated to Confirmed.
--
You received
Here is the output when mibs=auto (tried also with no mibs= line in
ups.conf, but the output is the same):
/lib/nut/snmp-ups -a ups1 -DDD
Network UPS Tools - Generic SNMP UPS driver 0.58 (2.6.3)
0.00 debug level is '3'
0.001183 SNMP UPS driver : entering upsdrv_initups()
Here is the output when mibs=auto (tried also with no mibs= line in
ups.conf, but the output is the same):
/lib/nut/snmp-ups -a ups1 -DDD
Network UPS Tools - Generic SNMP UPS driver 0.58 (2.6.3)
0.00 debug level is '3'
0.001183 SNMP UPS driver : entering upsdrv_initups()
Public bug reported:
I'm trying to connect to an AP9619 management card with SNMPv3 authPriv,
but the snmp-ups driver fails to start.
When running the driver directly:
$ sudo /lib/nut/snmp-ups -a ups1 -DDD
Network UPS Tools - Generic SNMP UPS driver 0.58 (2.6.3)
Public bug reported:
I'm trying to connect to an AP9619 management card with SNMPv3 authPriv,
but the snmp-ups driver fails to start.
When running the driver directly:
$ sudo /lib/nut/snmp-ups -a ups1 -DDD
Network UPS Tools - Generic SNMP UPS driver 0.58 (2.6.3)
Thank you for your help. I wasn't aware of the limitation
(incompatibility) caused by co-deploying LVM and multipath, it was my
assumption that multipath would be configured to take precedence over
LVM for having PVs on multipath block devices, as having it the other
way around, as in multiple
http://h2.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?lang=encc=ustaskId=115prodSeriesId=3559651prodTypeId=18964objectID=c01476873
This is the config recommended by HP for our SAN (2000 series is down there),
mine is functionally the same. There is no way to sense the priorities of the
Thank you for your help. I wasn't aware of the limitation
(incompatibility) caused by co-deploying LVM and multipath, it was my
assumption that multipath would be configured to take precedence over
LVM for having PVs on multipath block devices, as having it the other
way around, as in multiple
http://h2.www2.hp.com/bizsupport/TechSupport/Document.jsp?lang=encc=ustaskId=115prodSeriesId=3559651prodTypeId=18964objectID=c01476873
This is the config recommended by HP for our SAN (2000 series is down there),
mine is functionally the same. There is no way to sense the priorities of the
Public bug reported:
I have a SAN connected via a dual-port HBA that I'm trying to get to
work with multipath.
I'm running 12.04.2 installed via netboot (clean install).
Setup options: partitioning=guided with LVM (onto internal DRAC 6/i RAID)
packages=Basic server,OpenSSH,Virtual machine host
** Attachment added: udev log
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1178721/+attachment/3672267/+files/udev.multipath-BROKEN
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to multipath-tools in Ubuntu.
Public bug reported:
I have a SAN connected via a dual-port HBA that I'm trying to get to
work with multipath.
I'm running 12.04.2 installed via netboot (clean install).
Setup options: partitioning=guided with LVM (onto internal DRAC 6/i RAID)
packages=Basic server,OpenSSH,Virtual machine host
** Attachment added: udev log
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/multipath-tools/+bug/1178721/+attachment/3672267/+files/udev.multipath-BROKEN
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
This seems like a problem with DHCP (this is on an unencrypted network):
Oct 9 12:07:32 acer dhclient: Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client
4.1-ESV-R4
Oct 9 12:07:32 acer dhclient: Copyright 2004-2011 Internet Systems Consortium.
Oct 9 12:07:32 acer dhclient: All rights reserved.
Oct 9
I was plugged in when trying, not on battery, and it can be seen from
lspci that power management is/was off ... (power supply state doesn't
change this). It should work regardless, a netbook with no working
wireless when on battery wouldn't be really useful :)
--
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
When trying to connect to almost any wireless network, it never connects, the
indicator just keeps moving until it says Disconnected a minute or so later.
This happens 100% of the time with all encryped networks, and 99% of the time
with unencrypted networks. I have so far
** Attachment added: Syslog snippet with relevant log output
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063445/+attachment/3384090/+files/syslog.snip
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1063445
** Description changed:
When trying to connect to almost any wireless network, it never connects, the
indicator just keeps moving until it says Disconnected a minute or so later.
This happens 100% of the time with all encryped networks, and 99% of the time
with unencrypted networks. I have
52 matches
Mail list logo
