[Bug 1937024] Re: xrdp log created with wrong permissions

2024-05-03 Thread Jose Mari
Hi,

Please, mark it as solved.


I've tested in 24.04 (desktop) and has been corrected:  xrdp does not start if 
log not correctly configured (permissions).

root@ubuntu:/var/log# ls -l xrdp*
-rw-r- 1 root adm 2322 May  3 10:09 xrdp-sesman.log
-rw-r- 1 xrdp adm 9139 May  3 10:08 xrdp.log

toot@ubuntu:/var/log# systemctl restart xrdp
Job for xrdp.service failed because the control process exited with error code.
See "systemctl status xrdp.service" and "journalctl -xeu xrdp.service" for 
details.

root@ubuntu:/var/log# journalctl -xeu xrdp.service
(...)
░░ The job identifier is 3708.
May 03 10:10:06 ubuntu xrdp[9049]: Could not start log
May 03 10:10:06 ubuntu xrdp[9049]: Could not start log
May 03 10:10:06 ubuntu xrdp[9049]: error opening log file [The log is not 
properly started]. quitting.
May 03 10:10:06 ubuntu systemd[1]: xrdp.service: Control process exited, 
code=exited, status=1/FAILURE
(...)

Thanks!!!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1937024

Title:
  xrdp log  created with wrong permissions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xrdp/+bug/1937024/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063359] Re: [FFe] Use of NDEBUG in d/rules for 2.3.3+dfsg-0ubuntu2 on Noble generates an incompatible ABI

2024-04-26 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Need to convert the issue into an SRU now that Noble is out

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063359

Title:
  [FFe] Use of NDEBUG in d/rules for 2.3.3+dfsg-0ubuntu2 on Noble
  generates an incompatible ABI

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ogre-next/+bug/2063359/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2063359] Re: [FFe] Use of NDEBUG in 2.3.3 on Noble generates an incompatible ABI

2024-04-24 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
The Gazebo simulator running on a Noble container :)

** Attachment added: "Image of Gazebo Harmonic on Noble"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ogre-next/+bug/2063359/+attachment/5770080/+files/Screenshot%20from%202024-04-24%2018-36-29.png

** Description changed:

  Version bump for current ogre on Noble
-  - Tested on PPA with version:  ogre-next - 
2.3.3+dfsg-6~202404240955~ubuntu24.04.1 
- 
https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/ogre-next-recipe/+packages   
-  - MR: 
+  - Tested on PPA with version:  ogre-next - 
2.3.3+dfsg-6~202404240955~ubuntu24.04.1
+ https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/ogre-next-recipe/+packages
+  - MR: 
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ogre-next/+git/ogre-next-2/+merge/464934
  
  The latest bump in ogre-next for 2.3.3+dfsg-0ubuntu2 version came with an 
addition in d/rules
  of: -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="$(CXXFLAGS) -DDEBUG=0 -D_DEBUG=0". See 
https://git.launchpad.net/
  ubuntu/+source/ogre-next/tree/debian/rules#n15. That is generating 
incompatible ABIs if the
  same set of flags is not used in third party software. Specially difficult to 
detect since the problems will appear in the loading of the OGRE plugins not 
during the building. See the full justification for the long story:
  
  [Justification]
  
  For the current version 2.3.3+dfsg-0ubuntu2 the build process, the test
  suite and the autopkgtest did not detect any problem in the build or run
  of the different OGRE components.
  
  However when we (Gazebo simulator team) used the library to build our 
gazebo-rendering library we found problems with missing symbols at runtime when 
trying to load plugins.
  """
  
/ws/harmonic/install_noble/gz-rendering8/lib/gz-rendering-8/engine-plugins/libgz-rendering-ogre2.so:
 undefined symbol: 
_ZThn944_N4Ogre7HlmsPbs19_changeRenderSystemEPNS_12RenderSystemE
  """
  
  If we demangle that symbol the "T non-virtual thunk to
  Ogre::HlmsPbs::_changeRenderSystem(Ogre::RenderSystem*)" appears and
  that method do exists o the current OGRE version. The problem is that
  the ABI symbol has a different offset after _ZThn: instead of 944 it has
  1008. So the symbol is not the same for the loader:
  
-  1. _ZThn944_N4Ogre7HlmsPbs19_changeRenderSystemEPNS_12RenderSystemE  (in 
gz-rendering)
-  2. _ZThn1008_N4Ogre7HlmsPbs19_changeRenderSystemEPNS_12RenderSystemE (in 
2.3.3+dfsg-0ubuntu2)
+  1. _ZThn944_N4Ogre7HlmsPbs19_changeRenderSystemEPNS_12RenderSystemE  (in 
gz-rendering)
+  2. _ZThn1008_N4Ogre7HlmsPbs19_changeRenderSystemEPNS_12RenderSystemE (in 
2.3.3+dfsg-0ubuntu2)
  
  It is hard to know where this difference in the offset is coming from
  but I was able to track the problem to the use of -DDEBUG=0 -D_DEBUG=0
  in debian/rules added for the 2.3.3 version bump with respect to jammy
  2.2.5. Removing it, solves the offset difference.
  
  [Updating details]
  
  The MR linked to the bug just remove the custom NDEBUG flags added to
  d/rules. ogre-next does not have any reverse dependency at this moment
  in Ubuntu.
  
  [Testing done]
  
  Using the packages generated with the proposed change keeps the package
  building in all arches, passing the autopkgtest and allow use to run the
  Gazebo Simulator with the OGRE-Next libraries for the first time in
  Noble.
  
  With current 2.3.3+dfsg-0ubuntu2:
  - 8 ---
  [GUI] [Msg] Loading plugin [gz-rendering-ogre2]
  Error while loading the library 
[/usr/local/google/home/addisuzt/ws/harmonic/install_noble/gz-rendering8/lib/gz-rendering-8/engine-plugins/libgz-rendering-ogre2.so]:
 
/usr/local/google/home/addisuzt/ws/harmonic/install_noble/gz-rendering8/lib/gz-rendering-8/engine-plugins/libgz-rendering-ogre2.so:
 undefined symbol: 
_ZThn944_N4Ogre7HlmsPbs19_changeRenderSystemEPNS_12RenderSystemE
  [GUI] [Err] [RenderEngineManager.cc:501] Failed to load plugin 
[gz-rendering-ogre2] : couldn't load library on path 
[/usr/local/google/home/addisuzt/ws/harmonic/install_noble/gz-rendering8/lib/gz-rendering-8/engine-plugins/libgz-rendering-ogre2.so].
- - 8 --- 
+ - 8 ---
  With changes in proposed 2.3.3+dfsg-0ubuntu3:
  
- - 8 --- 
+ - 8 ---
  [GUI] [Wrn] [Application.cc:908] [QT] 
file::/EntityContextMenuPlugin/EntityContextMenuPlugin.qml:67:3: QML 
EntityContextMenu: Detected anchors on an item that is managed by a layout. 
This is undefined behavior; use Layout.alignment instead.
  failed to create drawable
  [GUI] [Msg] Loading plugin [gz-rendering-ogre2]
  [GUI] [Msg] Move to service on [/gui/move_to]
  [GUI] [Msg] Follow service on [/gui/follow]
  [GUI] [Msg] Move to pose service on [/gui/move_to/pose]
  [GUI] [Msg] Camera pose topic advertised on [/gui/camera/pose]
  [GUI] [Msg] Follow offset service on [/gui/follow/offset]
  [Msg] Found no 

[Bug 2063359] [NEW] [FFe] Use of NDEBUG in d/rules for 2.3.3+dfsg-0ubuntu2 on Noble generates an incompatible ABI

2024-04-24 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Public bug reported:

Revision bump for current ogre on Noble
 - Tested on PPA with version:  ogre-next - 
2.3.3+dfsg-6~202404240955~ubuntu24.04.1
https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/ogre-next-recipe/+packages
 - MR: 
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ogre-next/+git/ogre-next-2/+merge/464934

The latest bump in ogre-next for 2.3.3+dfsg-0ubuntu2 version came with an 
addition in d/rules
of: -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS="$(CXXFLAGS) -DDEBUG=0 -D_DEBUG=0". See 
https://git.launchpad.net/
ubuntu/+source/ogre-next/tree/debian/rules#n15. That is generating incompatible 
ABIs if the
same set of flags is not used in third party software. Specially difficult to 
detect since the problems will appear in the loading of the OGRE plugins not 
during the building. See the full justification for the long story:

[Justification]

For the current version 2.3.3+dfsg-0ubuntu2 the build process, the test
suite and the autopkgtest did not detect any problem in the build or run
of the different OGRE components.

However when we (Gazebo simulator team) used the library to build our 
gazebo-rendering library we found problems with missing symbols at runtime when 
trying to load plugins.
"""
/ws/harmonic/install_noble/gz-rendering8/lib/gz-rendering-8/engine-plugins/libgz-rendering-ogre2.so:
 undefined symbol: 
_ZThn944_N4Ogre7HlmsPbs19_changeRenderSystemEPNS_12RenderSystemE
"""

If we demangle that symbol the "T non-virtual thunk to
Ogre::HlmsPbs::_changeRenderSystem(Ogre::RenderSystem*)" appears and
that method do exists o the current OGRE version. The problem is that
the ABI symbol has a different offset after _ZThn: instead of 944 it has
1008. So the symbol is not the same for the loader:

 1. _ZThn944_N4Ogre7HlmsPbs19_changeRenderSystemEPNS_12RenderSystemE  (in 
gz-rendering)
 2. _ZThn1008_N4Ogre7HlmsPbs19_changeRenderSystemEPNS_12RenderSystemE (in 
2.3.3+dfsg-0ubuntu2)

It is hard to know where this difference in the offset is coming from
but I was able to track the problem to the use of -DDEBUG=0 -D_DEBUG=0
in debian/rules added for the 2.3.3 version bump with respect to jammy
2.2.5. Removing it, solves the offset difference.

[Updating details]

The MR linked to the bug just remove the custom NDEBUG flags added to
d/rules. ogre-next does not have any reverse dependency at this moment
in Ubuntu.

[Testing done]

Using the packages generated with the proposed change keeps the package
building in all arches, passing the autopkgtest and allow use to run the
Gazebo Simulator with the OGRE-Next libraries for the first time in
Noble.

With current 2.3.3+dfsg-0ubuntu2:
- 8 ---
[GUI] [Msg] Loading plugin [gz-rendering-ogre2]
Error while loading the library 
[/usr/local/google/home/addisuzt/ws/harmonic/install_noble/gz-rendering8/lib/gz-rendering-8/engine-plugins/libgz-rendering-ogre2.so]:
 
/usr/local/google/home/addisuzt/ws/harmonic/install_noble/gz-rendering8/lib/gz-rendering-8/engine-plugins/libgz-rendering-ogre2.so:
 undefined symbol: 
_ZThn944_N4Ogre7HlmsPbs19_changeRenderSystemEPNS_12RenderSystemE
[GUI] [Err] [RenderEngineManager.cc:501] Failed to load plugin 
[gz-rendering-ogre2] : couldn't load library on path 
[/usr/local/google/home/addisuzt/ws/harmonic/install_noble/gz-rendering8/lib/gz-rendering-8/engine-plugins/libgz-rendering-ogre2.so].
- 8 ---
With changes in proposed 2.3.3+dfsg-0ubuntu3:

- 8 ---
[GUI] [Wrn] [Application.cc:908] [QT] 
file::/EntityContextMenuPlugin/EntityContextMenuPlugin.qml:67:3: QML 
EntityContextMenu: Detected anchors on an item that is managed by a layout. 
This is undefined behavior; use Layout.alignment instead.
failed to create drawable
[GUI] [Msg] Loading plugin [gz-rendering-ogre2]
[GUI] [Msg] Move to service on [/gui/move_to]
[GUI] [Msg] Follow service on [/gui/follow]
[GUI] [Msg] Move to pose service on [/gui/move_to/pose]
[GUI] [Msg] Camera pose topic advertised on [/gui/camera/pose]
[GUI] [Msg] Follow offset service on [/gui/follow/offset]
[Msg] Found no publishers on /stats, adding root stats topic
[Msg] Found no publishers on /clock, adding root clock topic
[Msg] Serving scene information on [/world/shapes/scene/info]
[Msg] Serving graph information on [/world/shapes/scene/graph]
- 8 ---

The simulator loads just fine.

** Affects: ogre-next (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: noble

** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ogre-next/+git/ogre-next-2/+merge/464934

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063359

Title:
  [FFe] Use of NDEBUG in d/rules for 2.3.3+dfsg-0ubuntu2 on Noble
  generates an incompatible ABI

To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 2054477] Re: [FFe] Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble

2024-04-23 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
The ogre-next update was released and ignition-cmake was removed in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ros-catkin/+bug/2063103. I've
updated the statuses. All done here.

** Changed in: ogre-next (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Fix Released

** Changed in: ignition-cmake (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054477

Title:
  [FFe] Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-cmake/+bug/2054477/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2053254] Re: [FFe] Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics packages)

2024-04-23 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
The ignition-common and ignition-physics packages has be removed from
Ubuntu in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ros-
catkin/+bug/2063103 yesterday.

It can be totally omitted totally. I'm going to close the MR and edit
the description.

** Summary changed:

- [FFe] Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics 
packages)
+ [FFe] Update urdfdom and dart for Noble (Open Robotics packages)

** Description changed:

  Versions bump for the Open Robotics Community packages:
   - urdfdom to 4.0.0-0ubuntu1
     (Imported from https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/urdfdom)
   - dart to 6.13.1+ds-0ubuntu2
     https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/dart/log/?h=ubuntu/devel
- 
- As a side effect ignition-physics package needs also to be patch updated:
-  - ignition-physics to 5.1.0+ds1-4.1ubuntu2
-    (Imported from https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/ignition-physics)
- 
- The review found that there was a problem with a missing ignition-common 
package in s390:
-  - ignition-common (needs a rev bump)
-    
https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ignition-common/log/?h=ubuntu/noble
  
  Package PPA:
   https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/urdfdom4-noble/+packages
  
  (three merge-request are ready for review)
  
  [Other info]
  
  I have both version bumps ready on Debian but the 64bit_time transition[1] is 
preventing the
  packages to go through the lib transition since two weeks ago and counting. 
As we want to
  have these new versions in 24.04 (feature freeze is coming soon), we do the 
version bump
  directly on Ubuntu.
  
  [Justification]
  
  Important updates in a couple of packages used by the Open Robotics
  Community, particularly affecting ROS (Robot Operative System) and the
- ignition/Gazebo simulator.
+ Gazebo simulator.
  
   * urdfdom is changing the ABI/API completely by replacing tinyxml with 
tinyxml2
   * Dart current version 6.12.1 was released in .. 2019.
  
  There are important bugfixes in DART, specially the fix for a ton of
  compiler warnings with gcc-13 and patches for skeleton trees and
  grouping of constraints.
  
  Both packages should be lintian clean.
  
  [Transition details]
  
- The PPA includes all direct dependencies of urfdom and DART (ignition-
- physics and ros-urdf).
- 
-  * ignition-physics include a patch to work with new DART adding conditional 
code to deal with
-    minor DART API renames.
+ The PPA includes all direct dependencies of urfdom and DART (ros-urdf).
  
  All the previous architectures where the software was building before
  are also supported in the update with an important exception: new DART
  upstream releases do not support 32 bits, so armhf is lost from the
  list.
  
  [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2024/02/msg0.html
+ 
+ 
+ {edited on Apr 23rd -- removed since ignition packages were removed from 
Ubuntu}
+ 
+ As a side effect ignition-physics package needs also to be patch updated:
+  - ignition-physics to 5.1.0+ds1-4.1ubuntu2
+    (Imported from https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/ignition-physics)
+ 
+ The review found that there was a problem with a missing ignition-common 
package in s390:
+  - ignition-common (needs a rev bump)
+    
https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ignition-common/log/?h=ubuntu/noble

** Description changed:

  Versions bump for the Open Robotics Community packages:
   - urdfdom to 4.0.0-0ubuntu1
     (Imported from https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/urdfdom)
   - dart to 6.13.1+ds-0ubuntu2
     https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/dart/log/?h=ubuntu/devel
  
  Package PPA:
   https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/urdfdom4-noble/+packages
  
  (three merge-request are ready for review)
  
  [Other info]
  
  I have both version bumps ready on Debian but the 64bit_time transition[1] is 
preventing the
  packages to go through the lib transition since two weeks ago and counting. 
As we want to
  have these new versions in 24.04 (feature freeze is coming soon), we do the 
version bump
  directly on Ubuntu.
  
  [Justification]
  
  Important updates in a couple of packages used by the Open Robotics
  Community, particularly affecting ROS (Robot Operative System) and the
  Gazebo simulator.
  
   * urdfdom is changing the ABI/API completely by replacing tinyxml with 
tinyxml2
   * Dart current version 6.12.1 was released in .. 2019.
  
  There are important bugfixes in DART, specially the fix for a ton of
  compiler warnings with gcc-13 and patches for skeleton trees and
  grouping of constraints.
  
  Both packages should be lintian clean.
  
  [Transition details]
  
  The PPA includes all direct dependencies of urfdom and DART (ros-urdf).
  
  All the previous architectures where the software was building before
  are also supported in the update with an important exception: new DART
  upstream releases do not support 32 bits, so armhf is lost from the
  list.
  
  [1] 

[Bug 2058279] Re: [FFe] Sync pcl 1.14.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

2024-04-22 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks Utkarsh!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058279

Title:
  [FFe] Sync pcl 1.14.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental
  (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcl/+bug/2058279/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054477] Re: [FFe] Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble

2024-04-18 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
I'm afraid that we are stuck in transitioning https://ubuntu-archive-
team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#ogre-next because
there is a problem with autopkgtest. Sorry for that.

I've created a new merge-request to solve the problem
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ogre-next/+git/ogre-
next/+merge/464598.

Adding back ubuntu-sponsors to help with the upload. Thanks!

>  I'm not clear from the above if FFe acceptance was given for
ignition-cmake so I'm leaving that for now.

That is waiting for release-team, I provided contexts and info in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ogre-
next/+bug/2054477/comments/3

** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ogre-next/+git/ogre-next/+merge/464598

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054477

Title:
  [FFe] Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-cmake/+bug/2054477/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2053254] Re: [FFe] Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics packages)

2024-04-16 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Friendly ping.

I've created the three merge request for trying to move this forward and
make it easier for reviewers. Let me know what else needs to be done
more to help the testing. Thanks!

** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/dart/+git/dart/+merge/464445

** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ignition-common/+git/ignition-common/+merge/464446

** Description changed:

  Versions bump for the Open Robotics Community packages:
   - urdfdom to 4.0.0-0ubuntu1
     (Imported from https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/urdfdom)
   - dart to 6.13.1+ds-0ubuntu2
     https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/dart/log/?h=ubuntu/devel
  
  As a side effect ignition-physics package needs also to be patch updated:
   - ignition-physics to 5.1.0+ds1-4.1ubuntu2
     (Imported from https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/ignition-physics)
  
  The review found that there was a problem with a missing ignition-common 
package in s390:
   - ignition-common (needs a rev bump)
     
https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ignition-common/log/?h=ubuntu/noble
  
  Package PPA:
   https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/urdfdom4-noble/+packages
+ 
+ (three merge-request are ready for review)
  
  [Other info]
  
  I have both version bumps ready on Debian but the 64bit_time transition[1] is 
preventing the
  packages to go through the lib transition since two weeks ago and counting. 
As we want to
  have these new versions in 24.04 (feature freeze is coming soon), we do the 
version bump
  directly on Ubuntu.
  
  [Justification]
  
  Important updates in a couple of packages used by the Open Robotics
  Community, particularly affecting ROS (Robot Operative System) and the
  ignition/Gazebo simulator.
  
   * urdfdom is changing the ABI/API completely by replacing tinyxml with 
tinyxml2
   * Dart current version 6.12.1 was released in .. 2019.
  
  There are important bugfixes in DART, specially the fix for a ton of
  compiler warnings with gcc-13 and patches for skeleton trees and
  grouping of constraints.
  
  Both packages should be lintian clean.
  
  [Transition details]
  
  The PPA includes all direct dependencies of urfdom and DART (ignition-
  physics and ros-urdf).
  
   * ignition-physics include a patch to work with new DART adding conditional 
code to deal with
     minor DART API renames.
  
  All the previous architectures where the software was building before
  are also supported in the update with an important exception: new DART
  upstream releases do not support 32 bits, so armhf is lost from the
  list.
  
  [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2024/02/msg0.html

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053254

Title:
  [FFe] Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open
  Robotics packages)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dart/+bug/2053254/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2053254] Re: [FFe] Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics packages)

2024-04-16 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/urdfdom/+git/urdfdom/+merge/464439

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053254

Title:
  [FFe] Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open
  Robotics packages)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dart/+bug/2053254/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058914] Re: [FFe] python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8 7

2024-04-16 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
python-flake8 7.0.0 is no Noble (main repo).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058914

Title:
  [FFe] python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8  7

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flake8/+bug/2058914/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058914] Re: python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8 7

2024-04-12 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Given that the solution proposed is to ship a custom patch, I'm going to
bump this to a FFe to get acceptance of the release-team and also
unblock the excuses transition in existing Noble development cycle.

 * Merge request: 
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/python-pytest-flake8/+git/python-pytest-flake8/+merge/464197
 * Build tested: 
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+recipe/python-pytest-flake8-daily

[Justification]
This package is stopping the transition in Noble from noble-proposed to noble 
of python3-flake8, see 
https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#python-flake8

If you install python3-flake8 in regular Noble right now, you get version 
5.0.4.  
flake8 depends on pydocstyle, which was updated to a newer version (6.3.0), 
which changed API.  So attempting to run flake8 fails at startup, trying to call
an invalid API.

python3-flake8 7.0.0 and 8.1.1 (the latest) both fix this issue. 
8.1.1 is currently the version in noble-proposed.  However, it has been stuck 
in 
proposed for several months because pythonpytest-flake8 fails tests when used 
against that version.

See the problem in the long build of the ROS buildfarm:
https://build.ros2.org/view/Rdev/job/Rdev__ros2cli__ubuntu_noble_amd64/2/console

 8< -
08:29:45 _ test_flake8 
__
08:29:45 /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/flake8/plugins/finder.py:296: in 
_load_plugin
08:29:45 obj = plugin.entry_point.load()
08:29:45 /usr/lib/python3.12/importlib/metadata/__init__.py:205: in load
08:29:45 module = import_module(match.group('module'))
08:29:45 /usr/lib/python3.12/importlib/__init__.py:90: in import_module
08:29:45 return _bootstrap._gcd_import(name[level:], package, level)
08:29:45 /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/flake8/plugins/pycodestyle.py:25: in 

08:29:45 from pycodestyle import missing_whitespace_around_operator as 
_missing_whitespace_around_operator  # noqa: E501
08:29:45 E   ImportError: cannot import name 
'missing_whitespace_around_operator' from 'pycodestyle' 
(/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/pycodestyle.py). Did you mean: 
'whitespace_around_operator'?
 8< -


[Testing done]

We have been injecting the python3-flake version in noble-proposed into the ROS
buildfarm build, see that there are no failures any more, software run as 
expected:
https://ci.ros2.org/job/ci_linux/20828/console
 8< --
=== warnings summary 
===
test/test_flake8.py::test_flake8
test/test_flake8.py::test_flake8
test/test_flake8.py::test_flake8
test/test_flake8.py::test_flake8
test/test_flake8.py::test_flake8
test/test_flake8.py::test_flake8
test/test_flake8.py::test_flake8
test/test_flake8.py::test_flake8
  /usr/lib/python3.12/multiprocessing/popen_fork.py:66: DeprecationWarning: 
This process (pid=259742) is multi-threaded, use of fork() may lead to 
deadlocks in the child.
self.pid = os.fork()

-- Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/how-to/capture-warnings.html
---
 8< --

The ROS buildfarm is a large project for testing lot of software packages in 
open 
source robotics and the use of flake8 is integrated into each python package. We
have been using it last weeks without problems.

** Summary changed:

- python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8  7
+ [FFe] python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8  7

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058914

Title:
  [FFe] python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8  7

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flake8/+bug/2058914/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058914] Re: python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8 7

2024-04-12 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/python-pytest-flake8/+git/python-pytest-flake8/+merge/464197

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058914

Title:
  python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8  7

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flake8/+bug/2058914/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060852] Re: nvidia-driver-550-open fails with secure boot enabled

2024-04-10 Thread Jose Ogando Justo
** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Kuba Pawlak (kuba-t-pawlak)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060852

Title:
  nvidia-driver-550-open fails with secure boot enabled

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-550/+bug/2060852/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060717] Re: colcon-core argument parsing is broken by recent changes to Python 3.11+

2024-04-10 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
In coordination with Scott, we have raised this to be a FFe since the
package is severity damaged as it is now and probably unusable for any
use case that is not completely trivial.

I've created and linked the merge-request with the bumped version
against ubuntu/devel and testing the package.

** Description changed:

+ Patch version to solve a critical problem with colcon argument parsing
+ mechanism.
+ 
+  * Merge request: 
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ros2-colcon-core/+git/ros2-colcon-core/+merge/464037
+  * PPA related: 
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/noble-pkgs
+ 
+ 
+ [Justification]
+ 
+ Recent changes to Python which have been backported to Python 3.11 and
+ 3.12 break colcon argument parsing due to a dependency on private API in
+ argparse. A fix has been released in colcon-core 0.16.1 which should be
+ backported to any platforms which will receive the updated Python
+ releases. The python3-colcon-core package currently in Ubuntu Noble is
+ suffering from this issue now.
+ 
+ The current version in 0.15.2-1 fails to build due to problem in the
+ test suite that detect this problem:
+ https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/noble-
+ pkgs/+build/28042968
+ 
+ A quick test on Noble reports the problem:
+ - 8< 
+ $ mkdir /tmp/colcon-repro && cd /tmp/colcon-repro
+ $ colcon build --cmake-args --no-warn-unused-cli
+ 
+ Expected:
+ 
+ Summary: 0 packages finished
+ 
+ Actual:
+ 
+ usage: colcon [-h] [--log-base LOG_BASE] [--log-level LOG_LEVEL] 
{build,extension-points,extensions,graph,info,list,metadata,test,test-result,version-check}
 ...
+ colcon: error: unrecognized arguments: --no-warn-unused-cli
+ - 8< 
+ 
+ 
+ [testing done]
+ 
+ After using the changes proposed:
+ 
+ - 8< 
+ jrivero@22d248d84027:~/code/ubuntu$ sudo dpkg -i 
python3-colcon-core_0.15.2-1ubuntu1_all.deb 
+ (Reading database ... 58627 files and directories currently installed.)
+ Preparing to unpack python3-colcon-core_0.15.2-1ubuntu1_all.deb ...
+ Unpacking python3-colcon-core (0.15.2-1ubuntu1) over (0.15.2-1) ...
+ Setting up python3-colcon-core (0.15.2-1ubuntu1) ...
+ jrivero@22d248d84027:/tmp/colcon-repro$ colcon build --cmake-args 
--no-warn-unused-cli
+  
+ Summary: 0 packages finished [0.28s]
+ - 8< 
+ 
+ Playing with other colcon workspaces does not show any problem to
+ my eyes when passing different cmake-args like modifying the CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE.
+ 
+ 
+ [Original Scott email]
+ --- 8< ---
+ 
  Recent changes to Python which have been backported to Python 3.11 and
  3.12 break colcon argument parsing due to a dependency on private API in
  argparse.
  
  A fix has been released in colcon-core 0.16.1 which should be backported
  to any platforms which will receive the updated Python releases.
  
  The python3-colcon-core package currently in Ubuntu Noble is suffering
  from this issue now.
  
  https://github.com/colcon/colcon-core/pull/635

** Summary changed:

- colcon-core argument parsing is broken by recent changes to Python 3.11+
+ [FFe] colcon-core argument parsing is broken by recent changes to Python 3.11+

** Tags added: noble

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060717

Title:
  [FFe] colcon-core argument parsing is broken by recent changes to
  Python 3.11+

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ros2-colcon-core/+bug/2060717/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2060717] Re: colcon-core argument parsing is broken by recent changes to Python 3.11+

2024-04-10 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Merge proposal linked:
   
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ros2-colcon-core/+git/ros2-colcon-core/+merge/464037

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060717

Title:
  [FFe] colcon-core argument parsing is broken by recent changes to
  Python 3.11+

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ros2-colcon-core/+bug/2060717/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058914] Re: python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8 7

2024-04-02 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
> Not sure what would be best, if RM the package or invest time into
patching it.

Since no action happened last week, my teammate Chris Lalancette patched
the existing version to work with current flake8 on noble-proposed
7.0.0. I have updated the upstream PR with the information
https://github.com/tholo/pytest-flake8/pull/96#issuecomment-2032433686,
tested changes in a docker noble with:

 * flake8 7.0.0-1 (probably any version above 6 could work)
 * pytest 7.4.4-1 and pytest 8.0.2-1

I've created a PPA for testing the changes in proposed, builds fine in amd64
https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/python-pytest-flake8-noble/+packages

The .debdiff against current noble version is attached in this comment.


** Patch added: "python-pytest-flake8_1.1.1-4ubuntu1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-pytest-flake8/+bug/2058914/+attachment/5761331/+files/python-pytest-flake8_1.1.1-4ubuntu1.debdiff

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058914

Title:
  python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8  7

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flake8/+bug/2058914/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2053256] Re: [FFe] Update lcm to 1.5 for Noble

2024-03-26 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
I think I've answered the feedback in the last 5 commits and the MR is ready:
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/lcm/+git/lcm/+merge/463155

P.D: Vladimir I added you as a reviewer, I hope it is fine for you.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053256

Title:
  [FFe] Update lcm to 1.5 for Noble

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lcm/+bug/2053256/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2053256] Re: [FFe] Update lcm to 1.5 for Noble

2024-03-25 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks Andres, Vladimir. I'll try to get the merge request ready in the
next couple of days.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053256

Title:
  [FFe] Update lcm to 1.5 for Noble

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lcm/+bug/2053256/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058914] Re: python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8 7

2024-03-25 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
We (at the Open Robotics Foundation Alliance) are interested in helping
with the transition of python-flake8 from noble-proposed to noble and
have been monitoring the transition for some weeks.

There is an attempt of fixing the code in
https://github.com/tholo/pytest-flake8/pull/96 that we can work on
trying to make it to work, although seems not to work on pytest8 which
is the one in Ubuntu noble-proposed. That said, it is true that the
repository does not host new commits since 2 years ago.

Not sure what would be best, if RM the package or invest time into
patching it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058914

Title:
  python-pytest-flake8 FTBFS against python-flake8  7

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-flake8/+bug/2058914/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054477] Re: [FFe] Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble

2024-03-25 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks for the info Andreas!

Update: yesterday ignition-rendering was removed from Noble in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-
rendering/+bug/2058851. I'm going to update the description to remove
the references to ignition-rendering.

** Changed in: ignition-rendering (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Invalid

** Description changed:

  Version bump for ogre-next to version 2.3.3, well tested by Open
  Robotics under the Gazebo simulator.
  
   * Package PPA:
    - https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/ogre-next-recipe
   * Git ubunut/devel branch
     - 
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ogre-next/+git/ogre-next
  
  [Justification]
  
  ogre-next current version is 2.2.5 and was released in 2021. It does not 
support vulkan which probably make the release not interesting for the vast 
majority of current rendering developers. The bump also fixes
  LP: #1987207 and LP: #2003346.
  
  [Changelog]
  Upstream does not provide a Changelog file nor a NEWS file nor other
  updated mechanism that is not the GitHub release information notes.
  The list of bugfixes and features listed from 2.2.5 is simply huge:
  https://github.com/OGRECave/ogre-next/releases
  
  [Other Info]
  
  The package is not included in Debian. The version bump to 2.3.1 has been 
used by the Gazebo simulator team for the latest releases of Gazebo during 
several years and I've included the patches that has proven to be necessary, 
specially for vulkan support. Many of the
  Open Robotics patches has been merged upstream.
  
  Changes done with respect to ubuntu/devel branch:
  
  1dc7fa0 (HEAD -> ubuntu/devel, origin/ubuntu/devel) Update d/changelog
  fe78c7b Upstream fixed install paths to be standard
  b272862 Update d/copyright
  5ccf1e5 Massive cleanup of d/rules
  c020ca5 Update d/changelog
  5cb9fdb [PATCH] Added suport for riscv64 and ppc64
  6ca8aa6 Rediff patches
  3b2cb51 Update d/control and .install to 2.3.3
  3d60843 Update upstream source from tag 'upstream/2.3.3+dfsg'
  687514e (tag: upstream/2.3.3+dfsg, origin/upstream, upstream) New upstream 
version 2.3.3+dfsg
  547df32 Fix blender-ogre conflict name
  3940cc5 Update d/changelog
  d50eb7e Added a d/gbp.conf
  3286c7d Initial commit on orphan branch
  
  Changes in d/changelog:
    * New upstream version 2.3.3+dfsg
    * Rediff patches
    * Massive cleanup of d/rules after upstream merges
    * Update d/control and .install to 2.3.3
    * Update d/copyright
    * Fix package name for conflict with 1.9
  (LP: #1987207) (LP: #2003346)
    * Fix blender-ogre conflict name
    * [PATCH] Added support for riscv64 and ppc64
  
  [Dependencies]
  
- There is one direct dependency of ogre-next, ignition-rendering. Given
- that the version in Debian/Ubuntu is too old and probably a candidate to
- be removed, I've uploaded a new version of ignition-rendering that drops
- the support for ogre-next. It is still useful since it can use ogre-1.9.
- 
-  * Same package PPA with ogre-next
-   - https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/ogre-next-recipe
-  * Git and code for 6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu3:
-    - 
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ignition-rendering/+git/ignition-rendering/+ref/ubuntu/devel
+ Update from March 24: ignition-rendering was removed from Noble in
+ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-
+ rendering/+bug/2058851. There is no direct dependency for ogre-next in
+ Noble.
  
  There is another package that deal with ogre-next in an indirect manner
  providing build helpers: ignition-cmake. I've also patched this package
  to improve the ogre-next patch:
  
   * Same package PPA with ogre-next 2.17.1-2ubuntu2
    - https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/ogre-next-recipe
   * Git and code for
     - 
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ignition-cmake/+git/ignition-cmake/+ref/ubuntu/devel
+ 
+ 
+ [Outdated info related to ignition-rendering]
+ 
+ Outdated after the removal of ignition-rendering on March 24th from Noble.
+ 
+ There is one direct dependency of ogre-next, ignition-rendering. Given that 
the version in Debian/Ubuntu is too old and probably a candidate to be removed, 
I've uploaded a new version of ignition-rendering that drops the support for 
ogre-next. It is still useful since it can use ogre-1.9.
+ 
+  * Same package PPA with ogre-next
+   - https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/ogre-next-recipe
+  * Git and code for 6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu3:
+    - 
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ignition-rendering/+git/ignition-rendering/+ref/ubuntu/devel
+ 

** Changed in: ignition-cmake (Ubuntu)
   Status: Incomplete => New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054477

Title:
  [FFe] Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble

To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 2058279] Re: [FFe] Sync pcl 1.14.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

2024-03-22 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks Utkarsh!

The pcl package does not have autopkgtest itself, but the ros-perception-pcl 
has a large set of them. I ran them in a noble docker image, seems fine to me 
(selected output):

autopkgtest [19:37:43]: starting date and time: 2024-03-22 19:37:43+0100
autopkgtest [19:37:43]: version 5.32ubuntu3
autopkgtest [19:37:43]: host 26fb015185f5; command line: /usr/bin/autopkgtest 
--no-auto-control -- null
autopkgtest [19:37:44]: testbed dpkg architecture: amd64
autopkgtest [19:37:44]: testbed apt version: 2.7.12
autopkgtest [19:37:44]: testbed running kernel: Linux 6.5.0-26-generic 
#26~22.04.1-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue Mar 12 10:22:43 UTC 2
autopkgtest [19:37:44]:  unbuilt-tree .
autopkgtest [19:37:44]: testing package ros-perception-pcl version 1.7.5-1build2
autopkgtest [19:37:44]: build needed for binaries
autopkgtest [19:39:03]: test libpcl-conversions-dev: preparing testbed
autopkgtest [19:39:07]: test libpcl-conversions-dev: ./debian/tests/compilation 
pcl_conversions pcl_conversions/pcl_conversions.h
autopkgtest [19:39:07]: test libpcl-conversions-dev: [---
autopkgtest [19:39:12]: test libpcl-conversions-dev: ---]
autopkgtest [19:39:12]: test libpcl-conversions-dev:  - - - - - - - - - - 
results - - - - - - - - - -
autopkgtest [19:39:12]: test libpcl-ros-dev: preparing testbed
autopkgtest [19:39:17]: test libpcl-ros-dev: ./debian/tests/compilation pcl_ros 
pcl_ros/point_cloud.h
autopkgtest [19:39:17]: test libpcl-ros-dev: [---
autopkgtest [19:39:21]: test libpcl-ros-dev: ---]
autopkgtest [19:39:22]: test libpcl-ros-dev:  - - - - - - - - - - results - - - 
- - - - - - -
autopkgtest [19:39:22]: test python3-pcl-ros: preparing testbed
autopkgtest [19:39:29]: test python3-pcl-ros: python3 -c "import pcl_ros"
autopkgtest [19:39:29]: test python3-pcl-ros: [---
autopkgtest [19:39:29]: test python3-pcl-ros: ---]
autopkgtest [19:39:29]: test python3-pcl-ros:  - - - - - - - - - - results - - 
- - - - - - - -
autopkgtest [19:39:29]:  summary
autopkgtest [19:39:29]: Binaries: resetting testbed apt configuration

"""

I also compiled and run the
https://pcl.readthedocs.io/projects/tutorials/en/master/cloud_viewer.html#cloud-
viewer example, without problems.

Ran the pcl_viewer with the milk.pcd pointcloud from their repository
and got the expected visualizer window.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058279

Title:
  [FFe] Sync pcl 1.14.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental
  (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcl/+bug/2058279/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2033518] Re: spyder 5.4.4+ds-1 autopkgtest fails

2024-03-20 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Upstream fix was merged and released in 5.5.0. Noble is shipping this
patch.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2033518

Title:
  spyder 5.4.4+ds-1 autopkgtest fails

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/spyderlib/+bug/2033518/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2053254] Re: Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics packages)

2024-03-20 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Changelog from existing version on Noble

** Attachment added: "changelog_dart"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dart/+bug/2053254/+attachment/5757532/+files/changelog_dart.txt

** Description changed:

  Versions bump for the Open Robotics Community packages:
   - urdfdom to 4.0.0-0ubuntu1
-(Imported from https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/urdfdom)
+    (Imported from https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/urdfdom)
   - dart to 6.13.1+ds-0ubuntu2
-https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/dart/log/?h=ubuntu/devel
+    https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/dart/log/?h=ubuntu/devel
  
  As a side effect ignition-physics package needs also to be patch updated:
   - ignition-physics to 5.1.0+ds1-4.1ubuntu2
-(Imported from https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/ignition-physics)
+    (Imported from https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/ignition-physics)
  
  The review found that there was a problem with a missing ignition-common 
package in s390:
-  - ignition-common (needs a rev bump) 
-
https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ignition-common/log/?h=ubuntu/noble
+  - ignition-common (needs a rev bump)
+    
https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ignition-common/log/?h=ubuntu/noble
  
  Package PPA:
   https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/urdfdom4-noble/+packages
  
  [Other info]
  
  I have both version bumps ready on Debian but the 64bit_time transition[1] is 
preventing the
  packages to go through the lib transition since two weeks ago and counting. 
As we want to
  have these new versions in 24.04 (feature freeze is coming soon), we do the 
version bump
  directly on Ubuntu.
  
  [Justification]
  
  Important updates in a couple of packages used by the Open Robotics
  Community, particularly affecting ROS (Robot Operative System) and the
  ignition/Gazebo simulator.
  
   * urdfdom is changing the ABI/API completely by replacing tinyxml with 
tinyxml2
-  * Dart current version 6.9.2 was released in .. 2019 :(
+  * Dart current version 6.12.1 was released in .. 2019.
+ 
+ There are important bugfixes in DART, specially the fix for a ton of
+ compiler warnings with gcc-13 and patches for skeleton trees and
+ grouping of constraints.
  
  Both packages should be lintian clean.
  
  [Transition details]
  
  The PPA includes all direct dependencies of urfdom and DART (ignition-
  physics and ros-urdf).
  
   * ignition-physics include a patch to work with new DART adding conditional 
code to deal with
     minor DART API renames.
  
  All the previous architectures where the software was building before
  are also supported in the update with an important exception: new DART
  upstream releases do not support 32 bits, so armhf is lost from the
  list.
  
  [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2024/02/msg0.html

** Summary changed:

- Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics packages)
+ [FFe] Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics 
packages)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053254

Title:
  [FFe] Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open
  Robotics packages)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dart/+bug/2053254/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2053254] Re: Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics packages)

2024-03-20 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Description changed:

  Versions bump for the Open Robotics Community packages:
   - urdfdom to 4.0.0-0ubuntu1
+(Imported from https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/urdfdom)
   - dart to 6.13.1+ds-0ubuntu2
+https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/dart/log/?h=ubuntu/devel
  
  As a side effect ignition-physics package needs also to be patch updated:
   - ignition-physics to 5.1.0+ds1-4.1ubuntu2
+(Imported from https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/ignition-physics)
+ 
+ The review found that there was a problem with a missing ignition-common 
package in s390:
+  - ignition-common (needs a rev bump) 
+
https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ignition-common/log/?h=ubuntu/noble
  
  Package PPA:
   https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/urdfdom4-noble/+packages
-  (let me know if you prefer the code in bzr)
  
  [Other info]
  
  I have both version bumps ready on Debian but the 64bit_time transition[1] is 
preventing the
  packages to go through the lib transition since two weeks ago and counting. 
As we want to
  have these new versions in 24.04 (feature freeze is coming soon), we do the 
version bump
  directly on Ubuntu.
  
  [Justification]
  
  Important updates in a couple of packages used by the Open Robotics
  Community, particularly affecting ROS (Robot Operative System) and the
  ignition/Gazebo simulator.
  
   * urdfdom is changing the ABI/API completely by replacing tinyxml with 
tinyxml2
   * Dart current version 6.9.2 was released in .. 2019 :(
  
  Both packages should be lintian clean.
  
  [Transition details]
  
  The PPA includes all direct dependencies of urfdom and DART (ignition-
  physics and ros-urdf).
  
   * ignition-physics include a patch to work with new DART adding conditional 
code to deal with
     minor DART API renames.
  
  All the previous architectures where the software was building before
  are also supported in the update with an important exception: new DART
  upstream releases do not support 32 bits, so armhf is lost from the
  list.
  
  [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2024/02/msg0.html

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053254

Title:
  Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics
  packages)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dart/+bug/2053254/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2053254] Re: Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics packages)

2024-03-20 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
The PPA now has the s390x package of dart finally.

Answering the issues that Lucas found in the packaging:

> And FWIW, we are using git to maintain ubuntu package (using git-ubuntu), bzr
> has not been used for packages for a while AFAIK. But if it is easier for you
> to provide the packages in a PPA, that's also works IMO.

I've migrated the bazaar changes to Git and commit new changes to ubuntu/devel
https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/dart/log/?h=ubuntu/devel

> Thanks for the updated packages! I think you also noticed that two packages
> there, in the PPA, are failing to build from source in s390x, right? We need 
> to
> fix that because s390x is a officially supported architecture. Could you 
> please
> take a look to see if you can identify any issue?

Took me a little bit to debug things of a large package on s390x emulation but
finally found the problem in one of the dependencies of dart. I reported it 
upstream with the result of my research, it is not trivial to fix:
https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/dart/commit/?h=ubuntu/devel=84595c63d173c78f1c2653d3dd872ae44bbc48b5

> Missing build dependencies: libignition-common-dev (>= 4.0.0)
> If you check the version of this package in Noble you will notice that it
should be satisfiable:
> libignition-common-dev | 4.7.0+ds2-2ubuntu1 | noble/universe | amd64, arm64,
 armhf, ppc64el, riscv64

Also invested a bit of time debugging this, seems to me like there were some
platforms related to problems detailed in https://bugs.debian.org/977638

I've upload a new ignition-common package from the ubuntu/nobel branch that
built on s390x:
https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ignition-common/log/?h=ubuntu/noble
that 

> Regarding the dart armhf unsupportability, if upstream says it is not
> supported, you should change the Architecture fields in debian/control to
> reflect that. If you leave arch:any then it will be built in all 
> architectures,
> you'd need to exclude armhf.

Done in
https://git.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/dart/commit/?h=ubuntu/devel=a6a3f90252d0b47ec73638566f1b046a22ee1134

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #977638
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=977638

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053254

Title:
  Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics
  packages)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dart/+bug/2053254/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2058279] [NEW] [FFe] Sync pcl 1.14.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

2024-03-18 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Public bug reported:

Please sync pcl 1.14.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

Changelog entries since current noble version 1.13.0+dfsg-4build2:

pcl (1.14.0+dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=medium

  * Update Files-Excluded to drop zlib sources
  * New upstream version 1.14.0+dfsg
  * Update d/copyright
  * Rediff patches
  * Rename library packages due to Soname bump

 -- Jochen Sprickerhof   Wed, 07 Feb 2024 08:31:15
+0100

=
FFe Information
=

Version bump for the pcl package to latest 1.14

[Justification]

Current PCL in noble is from 2022, the latest 1.14 was released this
same year. There are a good bunch of bugfixes specially in 1.13.1 that
are relevant. The new version specially fixes a warning during the
configuration phase for current CMake + Eigen3:

--8<---
CMake Warning (dev) at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/pcl/PCLConfig.cmake:147 
(find_package): Policy CMP0144 is not set: find_package uses upper-case 
_ROOT variables. Run "cmake --help-policy CMP0144" for policy 
details. Use the cmake_policy
command to set the policy and suppress this warning.

CMake variable EIGEN_ROOT is set to: /usr/include/eigen3
--8<---

Attached is the file with changes for versions 1.13.1 and 1.14.0.

[Other Info]

The package has been more than one month in debian  experimental,
probably delaying the migration to unstable by the time_64t ABI
transition.

[Dependencies]

I've set up a Noble PPA to test the only dependency on Noble which is
the ros-perception-pcl that needs to be recompiled against this new
version bump. Compiles fine in all architectures:

 - https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/pcl-1.14-noble

** Affects: pcl (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: noble

** Description changed:

  Please sync pcl 1.14.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)
  
  Changelog entries since current noble version 1.13.0+dfsg-4build2:
  
  pcl (1.14.0+dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=medium
  
-   * Update Files-Excluded to drop zlib sources
-   * New upstream version 1.14.0+dfsg
-   * Update d/copyright
-   * Rediff patches
-   * Rename library packages due to Soname bump
+   * Update Files-Excluded to drop zlib sources
+   * New upstream version 1.14.0+dfsg
+   * Update d/copyright
+   * Rediff patches
+   * Rename library packages due to Soname bump
  
-  -- Jochen Sprickerhof   Wed, 07 Feb 2024 08:31:15
+  -- Jochen Sprickerhof   Wed, 07 Feb 2024 08:31:15
  +0100
+ 
+ 
+ --- FFe Information ---
+ 
+ 
+ Version bump for the pcl package to latest 1.14
+ 
+ [Justification]
+ 
+ Current PCL in noble is from 2022, the latest 1.14 was released this
+ same year. There are a good bunch of bugfixes specially in 1.13.1 that
+ are relevant. The new version also specially fixes warnings during the
+ configuration phase for current Eigen3:
+ 
+ --8<---
+ CMake Warning (dev) at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/pcl/PCLConfig.cmake:147 (find_package): Policy 
CMP0144 is not set: find_package uses upper-case _ROOT variables. 
Run "cmake --help-policy CMP0144" for policy details. Use the cmake_policy 
+ command to set the policy and suppress this warning. 
+ 
+ CMake variable EIGEN_ROOT is set to: /usr/include/eigen3
+ 
+ --8<---
+ 
+ Attached is the file with changes for versions 1.13.1 and 1.14.0.
+ 
+ [Other Info]
+ 
+ The package has been more than one month in debian  experimental,
+ probably delaying the migration to unstable by the time_64t ABI 
+ transition.
+ 
+ [Dependencies]
+ 
+ I've set up a Noble PPA to test the only dependency on Noble which is
+ the ros-perception-pcl that needs to be recompiled against this new
+ version bump. Compiles fine in all architectures:
+ 
+  - https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/pcl-1.14-noble

** Description changed:

  Please sync pcl 1.14.0+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)
  
  Changelog entries since current noble version 1.13.0+dfsg-4build2:
  
  pcl (1.14.0+dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=medium
  
    * Update Files-Excluded to drop zlib sources
    * New upstream version 1.14.0+dfsg
    * Update d/copyright
    * Rediff patches
    * Rename library packages due to Soname bump
  
   -- Jochen Sprickerhof   Wed, 07 Feb 2024 08:31:15
  +0100
  
- 
- --- FFe Information ---
- 
+ =
+ FFe Information 
+ =
  
  Version bump for the pcl package to latest 1.14
  
  [Justification]
  
  Current PCL in noble is from 2022, the latest 1.14 was released this
  same year. There are a good bunch of bugfixes specially in 1.13.1 that
  are relevant. The new version also specially fixes warnings during the
  configuration phase for current Eigen3:
  
  --8<---
- CMake Warning (dev) at 
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/cmake/pcl/PCLConfig.cmake:147 (find_package): 

[Bug 2053254] Re: Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics packages)

2024-03-18 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks Benjamin. I've been working on Lucas comments during the last week and 
hope to have ready the changes in this week. Yesterday upstream releases a new 
version that fixes all the compiler warnings for GCC-13 and I want to include 
it so we don't need to disable them:
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/dart/+git/dart/+ref/ubuntu/devel

I'll prepare the FFe ASAP.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053254

Title:
  Update urdfdom, dart and ignition-physics for Noble (Open Robotics
  packages)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dart/+bug/2053254/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054477] Re: [FFe] Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble

2024-03-10 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks Steve for the approval.

>  I'm not sure why there's an ignition-cmake task here, please clarify.

ignition-cmake are a set of CMake helpers used by the ignition/gazebo
family but can also be used alone. One of the helpers is a Find module
for ogre-next (also named Ogre2) https://salsa.debian.org/science-
team/ignition-cmake/-/blob/master/cmake/FindIgnOGRE2.cmake. Now that
ogre-next used a more standard approach for installing files and dirs,
we need to update the module to drop hacks and other ugly patches.

Final note: I realized yesterday that the vulkan support was not being
detected in the packaging so I've imported a couple of patches to make
it work on all arches. Final d/changelog:

ogre-next (2.3.3+dfsg-0ubuntu1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium

  * New upstream version 2.3.3+dfsg
  * Rediff patches
  * Massive cleanup of d/rules after upstream merges
  * Update d/control and .install to 2.3.3
  * Update d/copyright
  * Fix package name for conflict with 1.9
(LP: #1987207) (LP: #2003346)
  * Fix blender-ogre conflict name
  * Added vulkan dependencies
  * [PATCH] Added support for riscv64 and ppc64
  * [PATCH] Avoid shaderrc vulkan dependency
  * [PATCH] Fix armhf vulkan build
 
Corresponding 2.3.3+dfsg-5 build in the PPA
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+recipe/ogre-next-daily-1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054477

Title:
  [FFe] Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-cmake/+bug/2054477/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054477] Re: Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble

2024-03-08 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Description changed:

- Version bump for ogre-next to version 2.3.1, well tested by Open
+ Version bump for ogre-next to version 2.3.3, well tested by Open
  Robotics under the Gazebo simulator.
  
-  * Package PPA:
-   - https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/ogre-next-recipe
-  * Bzr and code:
-- https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ogre-next
+  * Package PPA:
+   - https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/ogre-next-recipe
+  * Git ubunut/devel branch
+    - 
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ogre-next/+git/ogre-next
+ 
+ 
+ [Justification]
+ 
+ ogre-next current version is 2.2.5 and was released in 2021. It does not 
support vulkan which probably make the release not interesting for the vast 
majority of current rendering developers. The bump also fixes 
+ LP: #1987207 and LP: #2003346.
+ 
+ 
  
  [Other Info]
  
- The package is not included in Debian. The version bump to 2.3.1 has
- been used by the Gazebo simulator team for the latest releases of Gazebo
- during several years and I've included the patches that has proven to be
- necessary, specially for vulkan support.
+ The package is not included in Debian. The version bump to 2.3.1 has been 
used by the Gazebo simulator team for the latest releases of Gazebo during 
several years and I've included the patches that has proven to be necessary, 
specially for vulkan support. Many of the
+ Open Robotics patches has been merged upstream.
  
- Changes done in the version bump:
-  * Upload upstream code 2.3.1
-  * Update d/copyright
-  * Fix package name for conflict with 1.9
-(LP: #1987207) (LP: #2003346)
-  * Include vulkan patches
-  * Include upstream patch to rename the project to Ogre-Next
-  * Include patches to deal with the rename and clean up d/rules
-  * Include patch for building with recent gcc
-  * Remove tinyxml embedded in code
+ Changes done with respect to ubuntu/devel branch:
+ 
+ 1dc7fa0 (HEAD -> ubuntu/devel, origin/ubuntu/devel) Update d/changelog
+ fe78c7b Upstream fixed install paths to be standard
+ b272862 Update d/copyright
+ 5ccf1e5 Massive cleanup of d/rules
+ c020ca5 Update d/changelog
+ 5cb9fdb [PATCH] Added suport for riscv64 and ppc64
+ 6ca8aa6 Rediff patches
+ 3b2cb51 Update d/control and .install to 2.3.3
+ 3d60843 Update upstream source from tag 'upstream/2.3.3+dfsg'
+ 687514e (tag: upstream/2.3.3+dfsg, origin/upstream, upstream) New upstream 
version 2.3.3+dfsg
+ 547df32 Fix blender-ogre conflict name
+ 3940cc5 Update d/changelog
+ d50eb7e Added a d/gbp.conf
+ 3286c7d Initial commit on orphan branch
+ 
+ Changes in d/changelog:
+   * New upstream version 2.3.3+dfsg
+   * Rediff patches
+   * Massive cleanup of d/rules after upstream merges
+   * Update d/control and .install to 2.3.3
+   * Update d/copyright
+   * Fix package name for conflict with 1.9
+ (LP: #1987207) (LP: #2003346)
+   * Fix blender-ogre conflict name
+   * [PATCH] Added support for riscv64 and ppc64
  
  [Dependencies]
  
  There is one direct dependency of ogre-next, ignition-rendering. Given
  that the version in Debian/Ubuntu is too old and probably a candidate to
  be removed, I've uploaded a new version of ignition-rendering that drops
  the support for ogre-next. It is still useful since it can use ogre-1.9.
  
-  * Same package PPA with ogre-next
-   - https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/ogre-next-recipe
-  * Git and code for 6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu3:
-- 
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ignition-rendering/+git/ignition-rendering/+ref/ubuntu/devel
+  * Same package PPA with ogre-next
+   - https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/ogre-next-recipe
+  * Git and code for 6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu3:
+    - 
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ignition-rendering/+git/ignition-rendering/+ref/ubuntu/devel
  
  There is another package that deal with ogre-next in an indirect manner
  providing build helpers: ignition-cmake. I've also patched this package
  to improve the ogre-next patch:
  
- 
-  * Same package PPA with ogre-next 2.17.1-2ubuntu2
-   - https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/ogre-next-recipe
-  * Git and code for 
-- 
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ignition-cmake/+git/ignition-cmake/+ref/ubuntu/devel
- 
-  
- [Justification]
- 
- ogre-next current version is 2.2.5 and was released in 2021. It does not
- support vulkan which probably make the release not interesting for the
- vast majority of current rendering developers.
+  * Same package PPA with ogre-next 2.17.1-2ubuntu2
+   - https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/ogre-next-recipe
+  * Git and code for
+    - 
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/ignition-cmake/+git/ignition-cmake/+ref/ubuntu/devel

** Description changed:

  Version bump for ogre-next to version 2.3.3, well tested by Open
  Robotics under the Gazebo simulator.
  
   * Package PPA:
    - 

[Bug 2054477] Re: Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble

2024-03-08 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Summary changed:

- Update ogre-next to 2.3.1 for Noble
+ Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054477

Title:
  Update ogre-next to 2.3.3 for Noble

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-cmake/+bug/2054477/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2053256] Re: [FFe] Update lcm to 1.5 for Noble

2024-03-06 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
> Regarding how you are providing the package to be sponsored, I
personally would prefer a git branch against pkg/ubuntu/devel. For these
cases where we go ahead of debian, what I would do is have the first
commit on top of pkg/ubuntu/devel be the new upstream version, and then
whatever changes are needed in the packaging to get that built for
noble.

I did that and published
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/lcm/+git/lcm/+ref/ubuntu/devel

** Description changed:

  Version bump for the lcm package to latest version 1.5.0+repack-0ubuntu1
  
- Package PPA:
+ Git changes and Package PPA:
+  - Ubuntu/devel git fork:
+
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/ubuntu/+source/lcm/+git/lcm/+ref/ubuntu/devel
   - https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/lcm-1.5
-1.5.0+repack-0ubuntu1 
-  - Debian Git Merge request
-https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lcm/-/merge_requests/1
- 
+    1.5.0+repack-0ubuntu1
+  - Debian Git Merge request
+    https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lcm/-/merge_requests/1
  
  Build logs for all architectures are available in the PPA.
  
  [Justification]
  
  Current lcm version 1.3.1 comes from 2016 and is quite broken for
  different use cases when using the tools provided by the package with
  modern versions of java and/or python, see
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lcm/+bug/1956368 as an
  example.
  
  Running a quick test for lcm-logplayer-gui in a Noble docker container:
  - 8< 
- jrivero@86d205b40951:~$ lcm-logplayer-gui 
+ jrivero@86d205b40951:~$ lcm-logplayer-gui
  Unrecognized option: -Xincgc
  Error: Could not create the Java Virtual Machine.
  Error: A fatal exception has occurred. Program will exit.
  - 8< 
  
  [Other info]
  
  I have the version bump ready on Debian but the 64bit_time transition[1] is 
preventing the
- packages to go through the lib transition since two weeks before the Import 
Freeze. 
+ packages to go through the lib transition since two weeks before the Import 
Freeze.
  
  https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lcm/-/merge_requests/1
  
  Changes done in the packaging:
  
   * New upstream version 1.5.0+repack
   * Formatter changes
   * Bump standards to 4.6.2
   * Use default-jdk package for java support
   * Bump version to 1.5.0+repack1
   * Rediff patches:
   * PATCH: use gnuinstalldirs in CMake
   * PATCH: use gtest from system
   * PATCH: use java system dependencies instead of embedded files
   * PATCH: Encode utf8 characters to fix the java build
   * PATCH: fix manpages name to make lintian happy
   * Add CMake to d/control
   * Use --no-parallel for testing
   * Cleanup d/rules
   * Update liblcm-doc.docs for new paths
   * Generalize d/liblcm-dev.install
   * Convert package to use pybuild. Change d/rules heavily.
   * Update java dependencies in d/control
   * Update d/copyright file
   * Keep lcm-java.pc only in the java package
   * Remove .doctrees from the -docs package
   * Add bindnow to DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS
   * Replace embedded fonts and jquery with system dependencies
   * Remove .gitignore from liblcm-doc installation
   * Update existing patch for javadoc generation
   * Update d/changelog
   * Rework java patch to use offline generation
   * Reorder java dependencies: in -bin and -java
   * Adding Section: to packages
   * Added autotest: install and build-cpp
  
  [Risk analysis - Library transition]
  There is no package depending on lcm currently in the Ubuntu repository. No 
library transition needs to performed.
  
  [Testing done]
  In the same Noble container I added the PPA and check the upgrade:
  --- 8< -
  The following additional packages will be installed:
-   libapache-pom-java libcommons-io-java libcommons-logging-java 
libcommons-parent-java libhamcrest-java libjchart2d-java libjide-oss-java 
liblcm-bin liblcm-java liblcm1
-   libxmlgraphics-commons-java
+   libapache-pom-java libcommons-io-java libcommons-logging-java 
libcommons-parent-java libhamcrest-java libjchart2d-java libjide-oss-java 
liblcm-bin liblcm-java liblcm1
+   libxmlgraphics-commons-java
  Suggested packages:
-   libcommons-io-java-doc libavalon-framework-java libexcalibur-logkit-java 
liblog4j1.2-java libjchart2d-java-doc libjide-oss-java-doc 
libxmlgraphics-commons-java-doc
+   libcommons-io-java-doc libavalon-framework-java libexcalibur-logkit-java 
liblog4j1.2-java libjchart2d-java-doc libjide-oss-java-doc 
libxmlgraphics-commons-java-doc
  The following NEW packages will be installed:
-   libapache-pom-java libcommons-io-java libcommons-logging-java 
libcommons-parent-java libhamcrest-java libjchart2d-java libjide-oss-java 
liblcm-dev liblcm-java libxmlgraphics-commons-java
+   libapache-pom-java libcommons-io-java libcommons-logging-java 
libcommons-parent-java libhamcrest-java libjchart2d-java libjide-oss-java 
liblcm-dev liblcm-java 

[Bug 2053256] Re: Update lcm to 1.5 for Noble

2024-03-06 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Diff of upstream changes from version 1.3.1 to 1.5.0

** Description changed:

  Version bump for the lcm package to latest version 1.5.0+repack-0ubuntu1
  
  Package PPA:
-  - https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/lcm-1.5
-  (let me know if you prefer a Bzr branch)
+  - https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/lcm-1.5
+1.5.0+repack-0ubuntu1 
+  - Debian Git Merge request
+https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lcm/-/merge_requests/1
+ 
+ 
+ Build logs for all architectures are available in the PPA.
+ 
+ [Justification]
+ 
+ Current lcm version 1.3.1 comes from 2016 and is quite broken for
+ different use cases when using the tools provided by the package with
+ modern versions of java and/or python, see
+ https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lcm/+bug/1956368 as an
+ example.
+ 
+ Running a quick test for lcm-logplayer-gui in a Noble docker container:
+ - 8< 
+ jrivero@86d205b40951:~$ lcm-logplayer-gui 
+ Unrecognized option: -Xincgc
+ Error: Could not create the Java Virtual Machine.
+ Error: A fatal exception has occurred. Program will exit.
+ - 8< 
  
  [Other info]
  
  I have the version bump ready on Debian but the 64bit_time transition[1] is 
preventing the
- packages to go through the lib transition since two weeks ago and counting. 
As we want to
- have these new versions in 24.04 (feature freeze is coming soon), we need to 
do the version bump directly on Ubuntu.
+ packages to go through the lib transition since two weeks before the Import 
Freeze. 
+ 
+ https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lcm/-/merge_requests/1
  
  Changes done in the packaging:
  
-  * New upstream version 1.5.0+repack
-  * Formatter changes
-  * Bump standards to 4.6.2
-  * Use default-jdk package for java support
-  * Bump version to 1.5.0+repack1
-  * Rediff patches:
-  * PATCH: use gnuinstalldirs in CMake
-  * PATCH: use gtest from system
-  * PATCH: use java system dependencies instead of embedded files
-  * PATCH: Encode utf8 characters to fix the java build
-  * PATCH: fix manpages name to make lintian happy
-  * Add CMake to d/control
-  * Use --no-parallel for testing
-  * Cleanup d/rules
-  * Update liblcm-doc.docs for new paths
-  * Generalize d/liblcm-dev.install
-  * Convert package to use pybuild. Change d/rules heavily.
-  * Update java dependencies in d/control
-  * Update d/copyright file
-  * Keep lcm-java.pc only in the java package
-  * Remove .doctrees from the -docs package
-  * Add bindnow to DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS
-  * Replace embedded fonts and jquery with system dependencies
-  * Remove .gitignore from liblcm-doc installation
-  * Update existing patch for javadoc generation
-  * Update d/changelog
-  * Rework java patch to use offline generation
-  * Reorder java dependencies: in -bin and -java
-  * Adding Section: to packages
-  * Added autotest: install and build-cpp
- 
- [Justification]
- 
- Current lcm version 1.3.1 comes from 2016 !! and is broken for different
- use cases when using the tools provided by the package with modern
- versions of java and/or python.
- 
- Curated changelog summary:
- 
- Release 1.5.0
- General
- Several bug fixes
- Fixed general and deprecation warnings on recent versions of Python 
and Java
- Build system
- Updated CMake to fix warnings
- Java
- Version 1.8 or later is now required
- Release 1.4.0
- Build system
- Switch to CMake
- Add CPack support
- lcm-gen
- Allow arrays to be sized with const values
- C
- Add lcm_subscription_get_queue_size()
- Standardize C/C++ code formatting with clang-format
- C++
- Add support for some C++11 features (lambda subscribe)
- add lcm::Subscription::getQueueSize()
- Python
-Add dimensions and typenames fields for better introspection
- lcm-logger
- flush buffers before exiting
- General
- Lots of misc bugfixes
+  * New upstream version 1.5.0+repack
+  * Formatter changes
+  * Bump standards to 4.6.2
+  * Use default-jdk package for java support
+  * Bump version to 1.5.0+repack1
+  * Rediff patches:
+  * PATCH: use gnuinstalldirs in CMake
+  * PATCH: use gtest from system
+  * PATCH: use java system dependencies instead of embedded files
+  * PATCH: Encode utf8 characters to fix the java build
+  * PATCH: fix manpages name to make lintian happy
+  * Add CMake to d/control
+  * Use --no-parallel for testing
+  * Cleanup d/rules
+  * Update liblcm-doc.docs for new paths
+  * Generalize d/liblcm-dev.install
+  * Convert package to use pybuild. Change d/rules heavily.
+  * Update java dependencies in d/control
+  * Update d/copyright file
+  * Keep lcm-java.pc only in the java package
+  * Remove .doctrees from the -docs package
+  * Add bindnow to DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS
+  * Replace embedded fonts and jquery with system dependencies
+  * Remove 

[Bug 2054151] Re: New http_relay package for Noble (for Robotics community)

2024-03-05 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Now in Noble/Universe. Fix Released.

** Changed in: http-relay (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054151

Title:
  New http_relay package for Noble (for Robotics community)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/http-relay/+bug/2054151/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054151] Re: New http_relay package for Noble (for Robotics community)

2024-02-29 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
It is now on noble proposed https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/http-
relay/2.1.3-1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054151

Title:
  New http_relay package for Noble (for Robotics community)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2054151/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 2054151] Re: New http_relay package for Noble (for Robotics community)

2024-02-28 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
The package has been uploaded in Debian to the NEW queue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054151

Title:
  New http_relay package for Noble (for Robotics community)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2054151/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959098] Re: [ovn] metadata route missing on the guest

2022-05-12 Thread Jose Guedez
Actually I can confirm ovn_metadata_enabled is set to "True". I was
looking in the wrong place (compute/metadata agent server) and this
seems to be set in the API server node:

/etc/neutron# grep -r ovn_metadata
plugins/ml2/ml2_conf.ini:ovn_metadata_enabled = True
ovn.ini:#ovn_metadata_enabled = false

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959098

Title:
  [ovn] metadata route missing on the guest

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1959098/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959098] Re: [ovn] metadata route missing on the guest

2022-05-11 Thread Jose Guedez
affected network/subnet information

** Attachment added: "LP1959098-affected-network.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1959098/+attachment/5588891/+files/LP1959098-affected-network.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959098

Title:
  [ovn] metadata route missing on the guest

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1959098/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959098] Re: [ovn] metadata route missing on the guest

2022-05-11 Thread Jose Guedez
unaffected network/subnet information

** Attachment added: "LP1959098-unaffected-network.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1959098/+attachment/5588890/+files/LP1959098-unaffected-network.txt

** Attachment removed: "LP1959098-affected-network.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1959098/+attachment/559/+files/LP1959098-affected-network.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959098

Title:
  [ovn] metadata route missing on the guest

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1959098/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959098] Re: [ovn] metadata route missing on the guest

2022-05-11 Thread Jose Guedez
** Attachment added: "LP1959098-affected-network.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1959098/+attachment/559/+files/LP1959098-affected-network.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959098

Title:
  [ovn] metadata route missing on the guest

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1959098/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959098] Re: [ovn] metadata route missing on the guest

2022-05-11 Thread Jose Guedez
We hit this issue today as well. Same symptoms:

* Failed to get metadata during VM launch - consistently and only on the 
"affected" network. Other networks like "unaffected" are OK.
* Missing metadata route inside VM
* After adding the route manually to the .2 IP we can ping/curl the metadata 
endpoint with no issues, so it seems the route is the only thing missing.
* The workaround of adding the metadata route explicitly to the relevant router 
allows new VMs in the affected network to get metadata without problems.

These are the current packages:

ii neutron-common 2:16.4.2-0ubuntu1
ii neutron-ovn-metadata-agent 2:16.4.2-0ubuntu1
ii python3-neutron 2:16.4.2-0ubuntu1
ii python3-neutron-lib 2.3.0-0ubuntu1
ii python3-neutronclient 1:7.1.1-0ubuntu1

I am attaching the information requested above for an "affected" and
"unaffected" network. The main difference I see is that the "unaffected"
subnet has the following option in the ovn-nb that is missing from the
"affected" subnet:

classless_static_route="{169.254.169.254/32,10.131.83.2,
0.0.0.0/0,10.131.83.1}"

The two patches you mention are indeed included in python3-neutron
2:16.4.2-0ubuntu1. I additionally confirmed by checking
/usr/lib/python3/dist-
packages/neutron/plugins/ml2/drivers/ovn/mech_driver/ovsdb/ovn_client.py

Regarding "ovn_metadata_enabled", I didn't find it set to "true" in any
config under /etc/neutron. I can only see the default commented out and
no mention in neutron_ovn_metadata_agent.ini, which has the ovs/ovn
config in it (but I am no expert)

/etc/neutron# grep -r ovn_metadata
ovn.ini:#ovn_metadata_enabled = false

The creation logs are no longer available. The ports for the .2 IPs are
created in the subnet, and they do have a device_id of
ovnmeta-, but the device_owner is network:dhcp and not
network:distributed as you seem to be expecting. I added the output of
`port show` for them as well. Note that other networks on the same
compute nodes have no issues providing metadata, including the
"unaffected" network (data attached).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959098

Title:
  [ovn] metadata route missing on the guest

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1959098/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1970707] [NEW] unable to install new version of '/usr/share/themes/Pop-dark/gtk-3.20/gtk.css': No such file or directory

2022-04-27 Thread fredin jose
Public bug reported:

Release of Ubuntu
Description:Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS
Release:20.04

Version of the package 
Version 5.2.0~1586289568~20.04~f35b83b~ubuntu1

dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/pop-gtk-theme_5.2.0~1586289568~20.04~f35b83b~ubuntu1_all.deb
 (--unpack):
 unable to install new version of 
'/usr/share/themes/Pop-dark/gtk-3.20/gtk.css': No such file or directory
No apport report written because the error message indicates an issue on the 
local system

 Errors were encountered while processing:
 
/var/cache/apt/archives/pop-gtk-theme_5.2.0~1586289568~20.04~f35b83b~ubuntu1_all.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: pop-gtk-theme 3.1.2~1535402967~18.04~cc107bf
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-109.123-generic 5.4.178
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-109-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.23
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Thu Apr 28 10:58:36 2022
InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-04-08 (19 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20180725)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_IN:en
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_IN
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: pop-gtk-theme
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
modified.conffile..etc.default.apport:
 # set this to 0 to disable apport, or to 1 to enable it
 # you can temporarily override this with
 # sudo service apport start force_start=1
 enabled=0
mtime.conffile..etc.default.apport: 2018-10-28T20:41:46

** Affects: pop-gtk-theme (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970707

Title:
  unable to install new version of '/usr/share/themes/Pop-
  dark/gtk-3.20/gtk.css': No such file or directory

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pop-gtk-theme/+bug/1970707/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1970030] [NEW] package calamares-settings-debian (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/etc/calamares/modules/bootloader.conf', which is also in package calamares-settin

2022-04-23 Thread Jose D Venegas
Public bug reported:

I am trying to download application.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: calamares-settings-debian (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-27.28-generic 5.15.30
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-27-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82
AptOrdering:
 calamares-settings-debian:amd64: Install
 NULL: ConfigurePending
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
Date: Sat Apr 23 05:21:11 2022
DpkgTerminalLog:
 Preparing to unpack .../calamares-settings-debian_11.0.5-2_all.deb ...
 Unpacking calamares-settings-debian (11.0.5-2) ...
 dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/calamares-settings-debian_11.0.5-2_all.deb (--unpack):
  trying to overwrite '/etc/calamares/modules/bootloader.conf', which is also 
in package calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:22.04.4
DuplicateSignature:
 package:calamares-settings-debian:(not installed)
 Unpacking calamares-settings-debian (11.0.5-2) ...
 dpkg: error processing archive 
/var/cache/apt/archives/calamares-settings-debian_11.0.5-2_all.deb (--unpack):
  trying to overwrite '/etc/calamares/modules/bootloader.conf', which is also 
in package calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:22.04.4
ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite '/etc/calamares/modules/bootloader.conf', 
which is also in package calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:22.04.4
InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-04-22 (1 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 (20220419)
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.10, Python 3.10.4, python3-minimal, 
3.10.4-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: N/A
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.21.1ubuntu2
 apt  2.4.5
SourcePackage: calamares-settings-debian
Title: package calamares-settings-debian (not installed) failed to 
install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/etc/calamares/modules/bootloader.conf', 
which is also in package calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:22.04.4
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: calamares-settings-debian (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package jammy need-duplicate-check package-conflict

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1970030

Title:
  package calamares-settings-debian (not installed) failed to
  install/upgrade: trying to overwrite
  '/etc/calamares/modules/bootloader.conf', which is also in package
  calamares-settings-lubuntu 1:22.04.4

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/calamares-settings-debian/+bug/1970030/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960940] Re: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-04-21 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks so much Graham! I was testing the installation and the simulator
and seems to work fine. There is a minor inconvenient for users that is
trivial to fix: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-
gazebo/+bug/1969803.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960940

Title:
  [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960940/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1969803] [NEW] [needs-sponsor] Change Suggests by Recommends for ignition-tools in ignition-gazebo in Jammy

2022-04-21 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Public bug reported:

Minor change to move ignition-tools from Suggest to Recommends in
ignition-gazebo.

The ign tool inside ignition-tools is required to be able to star the
Ignition Gazebo simulator. The number of cases where an user want to
have the libraries but never start the simulator are unusual.

Attached is the debdiff against current version.

** Affects: ignition-gazebo (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Jose Luis Rivero (j-rivero)
 Status: New


** Tags: jammy

** Patch added: "ignition-gazebo_recommends_tools.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969803/+attachment/5582140/+files/ignition-gazebo_recommends_tools.debdiff

** Changed in: ignition-gazebo (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Jose Luis Rivero (j-rivero)

** Summary changed:

- [needs-sponsor] Change Suggests by Recommends for ignition-tools in 
ignition-gazebo
+ [needs-sponsor] Change Suggests by Recommends for ignition-tools in 
ignition-gazebo in Jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969803

Title:
  [needs-sponsor] Change Suggests by Recommends for ignition-tools in
  ignition-gazebo in Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-gazebo/+bug/1969803/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960940] Re: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-04-19 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
I think I have it. I added more details in the commit to bzr and in the
patch description according to DEP-3. In summary:

The test is failing due to a problem in ignition-tools version 1.4.1 (coming 
from Debian). It does
not include libignition-tools-backward lib due to a bug in Debian packaging 
(requiring a new package + NEW queue, I'll fix it in Debian where I'm the 
maintainer).

The bug is triggering a warning in output "Library error: libignition-
tools-backward.so not found. Improved backtrace generation will be
disabled". That support is optional so I have changed the tests to
expect a substring with the real value instead of fully match the real
value, that should make it to work with both: backwards support or not
in ignition-tools.

Commit with the patch:
https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ignition-launch/revision/2
Bump revision at:
https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ignition-launch/revision/3

Tested:
https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/jammy-packages/+build/23559082

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960940

Title:
  [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960940/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960940] Re: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-04-19 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Looking at it now.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960940

Title:
  [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960940/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960940] Re: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-04-18 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
>  We just need a couple of small patches:
> - ignition-physics for amd64 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-physics/+bug/1965064
> - ignition-rendering 
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-rendering/+bug/1967888

These open bugs are now fixed. We should be in a good position to review
and import ignition-gazebo and ignition-launch.

** Tags removed: needs-packaging

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960940

Title:
  [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960940/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1969289] [NEW] Secondary display does not work

2022-04-16 Thread Jose Dihego
Public bug reported:

Secondary display does not work

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-25.25-generic 5.15.30
Uname: Linux 5.15.0-25-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sat Apr 16 20:29:43 2022
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: jammy
DistroVariant: ubuntu
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation Skylake GT2 [HD Graphics 520] [8086:1916] (rev 07) (prog-if 
00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Dell Skylake GT2 [HD Graphics 520] [1028:06fd]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-04-14 (2 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Daily amd64 (20220409)
MachineType: Dell Inc. Inspiron 13-7359
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.15.0-25-generic 
root=UUID=3b34bc2c-2f64-49d2-9734-d6ff9a9d3b14 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 09/06/2016
dmi.bios.release: 1.12
dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 01.12.00
dmi.board.name: 0X1DP8
dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.board.version: A00
dmi.chassis.type: 9
dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr01.12.00:bd09/06/2016:br1.12:svnDellInc.:pnInspiron13-7359:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0X1DP8:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct9:cvr:sku06FD:
dmi.product.name: Inspiron 13-7359
dmi.product.sku: 06FD
dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.110-1ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 22.0.1-1ubuntu2
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:21.1.3-2ubuntu2
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-2build3
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 
2:2.99.917+git20210115-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-2build1

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy ubuntu wayland-session

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1969289

Title:
  Secondary display does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1969289/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1965780] Re: [needs-sponsor] Sync gazebo 11.10.2+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

2022-04-14 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Hello Łukasz:

I think we did a good work with versioning and the upload should have
gone just fine. In fact, I was able to test Gazebo 11.10.2+dfsg-1
directly from Jammy repositories and works like a charm. It does not
conflict anymore with opencv.

Thanks so much for the review and upload!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965780

Title:
  [needs-sponsor] Sync gazebo 11.10.2+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian
  experimental (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1965780/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1773811] Re: [SRU] Missing static libs in the -dev package metadata

2022-04-11 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Changed in: gazebo (Ubuntu)
   Status: New => Invalid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773811

Title:
  [SRU] Missing static libs in the -dev package metadata

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1773811/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960940] Re: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-04-05 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Hello Łukasz:

Is there anything more I can do to help with these two remaining packages? We 
have been tested ignition-gazebo simulator on Jammy and it works great. We just 
need a couple of small patches:
 - ignition-physics for amd64 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-physics/+bug/1965064
 - ignition-rendering 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-rendering/+bug/1967888

With these two patches, the two packages ignition-gazebo and ignition-
launch were tested successfully in a Jammy system.

Thanks for the help!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960940

Title:
  [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960940/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1967888] Re: Patch to fix unusable ign-rendering on Jammy

2022-04-05 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Patch added: "ignition-rendering_6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu2.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-rendering/+bug/1967888/+attachment/5577343/+files/ignition-rendering_6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu2.debdiff

** Changed in: ignition-rendering (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Jose Luis Rivero (j-rivero)

** Summary changed:

- Patch to fix unusable ign-rendering on Jammy
+ [needs-sponsor] Patch to fix unusable ign-rendering on Jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967888

Title:
  [needs-sponsor] Patch to fix unusable ign-rendering on Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-rendering/+bug/1967888/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1967888] [NEW] [needs-sponsor] Patch to fix unusable ign-rendering on Jammy

2022-04-05 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Public bug reported:

Current version of ign-rendering on Jammy 6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu1 lack of some
basic linking on ogre-next to make the software really usable, otherwise
the loader fails to find the needed ogre2 symbols. On top of this,
OGRE2_RESOURCE_PATH coming from ogre-next is not correct. The patch
attached implements:

 * Add the missing libraries to the link of ogre2, in 0003-use-ogre-next-debian 
patch.
 * Inject right OGRE2_RESOURCE_PATH path to the build instead of leaving the 
default wrong one

** Affects: ignition-rendering (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Jose Luis Rivero (j-rivero)
 Status: New


** Tags: jammy

** Description changed:

  Current version of ign-rendering on Jammy 6.1.0+ds-0ubuntu1 lack of some
  basic linking on ogre-next to make the software really usable, otherwise
  the loader fails to find the needed ogre2 symbols. On top of this,
  OGRE2_RESOURCE_PATH coming from ogre-next is not correct. The patch
  attached implements:
  
-  * Add the missing libraries to the link of ogre2, in 
0003-use-ogre-next-debian patch.
-  * Inject right OGRE2_RESOURCE_PATH path to the build instead of leaving the 
default wrong one
+  * Add the missing libraries to the link of ogre2, in 
0003-use-ogre-next-debian patch.
+  * Inject right OGRE2_RESOURCE_PATH path to the build instead of leaving the 
default wrong one

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1967888

Title:
  [needs-sponsor] Patch to fix unusable ign-rendering on Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-rendering/+bug/1967888/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1965780] Re: [needs-sponsor] Sync gazebo 11.10.2+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

2022-04-04 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Summary changed:

- Sync gazebo 11.10.2+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)
+ [needs-sponsor] Sync gazebo 11.10.2+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian 
experimental (main)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965780

Title:
  [needs-sponsor] Sync gazebo 11.10.2+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian
  experimental (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1965780/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1965780] [NEW] Sync gazebo 11.10.2+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

2022-03-21 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Public bug reported:

Please sync gazebo 11.10.2+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental
(main)

Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped:
  * (Build-)depend on libtbb2-dev instead of libtbb-dev.

Current Gazebo version in Debian Sid and Ubuntu Jammy is version 11.10.1, the 
upstream sources were not prepared to use the new tbb, Debian was under an 
unfinished ongoing transition
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007222.

Ubuntu Jammy ships the new version of tbb and the solution decided for going 
forward was to split tbb packages in two different ones conflicting each other. 
Gazebo was changed to use tbb2-dev (old version of tbb):
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006920

This is not needed anymore since 11.10.2 Gazebo is ready for using new tbb. The 
current setup is causing problems to the robotics community, see
https://github.com/ros-planning/navigation2/pull/2852#issuecomment-1072789270

Changelog entries since current jammy version 11.10.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1:

gazebo (11.10.2+dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=medium

  * New upstream version 11.10.2+dfsg
  * Rediff patches
  * Use static manpages, Remove dependency on ronn
to avoid installing ruby.
  * Target experimental to test tbb/onetbb transition #1007222
11.10.2 upstream source should be ready for it.

 -- Jose Luis Rivero   Sat, 19 Mar 2022
19:58:37 +

I've tested this new version on Jammy under my PPA (Gazebo is amd64 only):
https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/jammy-packages/+build/23487008

** Affects: gazebo (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: jammy

** Tags added: jammy

** Description changed:

  Please sync gazebo 11.10.2+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental
  (main)
  
  Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped:
-   * (Build-)depend on libtbb2-dev instead of libtbb-dev.
+   * (Build-)depend on libtbb2-dev instead of libtbb-dev.
  
- Current Gazebo version in Debian Sid and Ubuntu Jammy is version 11.10.1, the
- upstream sources were not prepared to use the new tbb, Debian was under an
- unfinished ongoing transition
+ Current Gazebo version in Debian Sid and Ubuntu Jammy is version 11.10.1, the 
upstream sources were not prepared to use the new tbb, Debian was under an 
unfinished ongoing transition
  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1007222.
  
- Ubuntu Jammy ships the new version of tbb and the solution decided for going
- forward was to split tbb packages in two different ones conflicting each 
other.
- Gazebo was changed to use tbb2-dev (old version of tbb):
+ Ubuntu Jammy ships the new version of tbb and the solution decided for going 
forward was to split tbb packages in two different ones conflicting each other. 
Gazebo was changed to use tbb2-dev (old version of tbb):
  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006920
  
- This is not needed anymore since 11.10.2 Gazebo is ready for using new tbb. 
The
- current setup is causing problems to the robotics community, see
+ This is not needed anymore since 11.10.2 Gazebo is ready for using new tbb. 
The current setup is causing problems to the robotics community, see
  https://github.com/ros-planning/navigation2/pull/2852#issuecomment-1072789270
  
  Changelog entries since current jammy version 11.10.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1:
  
  gazebo (11.10.2+dfsg-1) experimental; urgency=medium
  
-   * New upstream version 11.10.2+dfsg
-   * Rediff patches
-   * Use static manpages, Remove dependency on ronn
- to avoid installing ruby.
-   * Target experimental to test tbb/onetbb transition #1007222
- 11.10.2 upstream source should be ready for it.
+   * New upstream version 11.10.2+dfsg
+   * Rediff patches
+   * Use static manpages, Remove dependency on ronn
+ to avoid installing ruby.
+   * Target experimental to test tbb/onetbb transition #1007222
+ 11.10.2 upstream source should be ready for it.
  
-  -- Jose Luis Rivero   Sat, 19 Mar 2022
+  -- Jose Luis Rivero   Sat, 19 Mar 2022
  19:58:37 +
  
  I've tested this new version on Jammy under my PPA (Gazebo is amd64 only):
  https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/jammy-packages/+build/23487008

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965780

Title:
  Sync gazebo 11.10.2+dfsg-1 (universe) from Debian experimental (main)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gazebo/+bug/1965780/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960260] Re: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-03-16 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
> keep an eye on the builds and always available to provide patches as
needed.

I just checked that ignition-gui, ignition-rendering and ignition-
sensors have been built just fine in amd64, arm64, armhf, ppc64el and
riscv64. The only remaining problem would be s390x but the issue is the
lack of one of the dependencies (ignition-common) which I believe is out
of the scope of this request.

I think that we can call it done, thanks for the reviews and fixes
Łukasz!


** Changed in: ubuntu
   Status: In Progress => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960260

Title:
  [needs-sponsor] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960260/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960940] Re: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-03-16 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
> I have sponsored the rendering packages from the other bug. Not sure
if I'll have the cycles to sponsor/review the others today.

No worries Łukasz. I've been using these last days to check that all
pieces are in place and found a weird bug on ignition-physics amd64
(which is a dependency of ignition-gazebo) that make testsuite to
segfault when using Ubuntu's linker optimization flto=auto -ffat-lto-
objects. I've fixed the build together with ppc64 in:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-physics/+bug/1965064
(patches are trivial).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960940

Title:
  [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960940/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1965064] Re: ignition-physics testsuite segfaults on amd64 when using flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects

2022-03-16 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Attached is the debdiff that solves the problem for the amd64 build by
filtering out the flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects.

The patch also includes a fix for the ppc64 build now that we are at it.
Both changes are reflected in the Changelog and tested in my PPA:

 * amd64 
https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/jammy-packages/+build/23249466
 * ppc64 
https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/jammy-packages/+build/23249469

** Patch added: "ignition-physics_5.1.0+ds1-4ubuntu1.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-physics/+bug/1965064/+attachment/5569797/+files/ignition-physics_5.1.0+ds1-4ubuntu1.debdiff

** Summary changed:

- ignition-physics testsuite segfaults on amd64 when using flto=auto 
-ffat-lto-objects
+ [needs-sponsor] ignition-physics testsuite segfaults on amd64/Jammy when 
using flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965064

Title:
  [needs-sponsor] ignition-physics testsuite segfaults on amd64/Jammy
  when using flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-physics/+bug/1965064/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1965064] [NEW] ignition-physics testsuite segfaults on amd64 when using flto=auto -ffat-lto-objects

2022-03-15 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Public bug reported:

Current ignition-physics version 5.1.0+ds1-4 fails on amd64 with segfaults in 
some of the tests:
https://launchpadlibrarian.net/589246385/buildlog_ubuntu-jammy-amd64.ignition-physics_5.1.0+ds1-4_BUILDING.txt.gz

The situation was unusual since the same version imported from Debian
Sid built just fine. I was debugging the problem in upstream issue
tracker: https://github.com/ignitionrobotics/ign-physics/issues/330.

Summary: Ubuntu Jammy is using linker optimizations -flto=auto -ffat-
lto-objects that make the package to fail when running tests in
ignition-physics.

** Affects: ignition-physics (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1965064

Title:
  ignition-physics testsuite segfaults on amd64 when using flto=auto
  -ffat-lto-objects

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ignition-physics/+bug/1965064/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1942695] Re: DeskTop freezes for up to 5 seconds the first keystroke on Gnome terminal after boot.

2022-03-15 Thread Jose Netto
I am testing Ubuntu 22.04 and until now (03/15/2022) issue solved on
RPI4.

Thanks anybody,

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942695

Title:
  DeskTop freezes for up to 5 seconds the first keystroke on Gnome
  terminal after boot.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1942695/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960260] Re: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-03-14 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks so much Łukasz for reviews and comment.

> why is NEWS excluded from the ingnition-rendering tarball? It's just
an URL. Basically I'd normally not repack the tarball and exclude
sources unless really necessary (like when for instance upstream ships
something bad in the tarball, like compiled binaries etc.).

Not an strong reason for excluding NEWS more than get rid of some not
very useful files. I agree, not worth it. I'm using repacking as my
normal workflow as Debian maintainer to get rid of embedded libs,
copyrighted files and usually include other not so critical files like
.github/ or other CI configurations.

> ...oh, and since not all architectures were enabled on the PPA (please
be sure to enable as many as possible!), please be sure to check if the
packages build successfully on ALL the arches after upload. Thanks. And
I recommend switching the other arches for future builds.

Ouch, enabled ARM but forgot the other previously. I've already enabled
all to be checked in possible future iterations. I keep an eye on the
builds and always available to provide patches as needed.

Thanks again.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960260

Title:
  [needs-sponsor] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960260/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960260] Re: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-03-04 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Summary changed:

- [needs-packaging] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy
+ [needs-sponsor] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960260

Title:
  [needs-sponsor] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960260/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960940] Re: [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-03-04 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Summary changed:

- [needs-packaging] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy
+ [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960940

Title:
  [needs-sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960940/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1963583] Re: Needs rebuild in Jammy for python3.10

2022-03-03 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Tags added: jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1963583

Title:
  Needs rebuild in Jammy for python3.10

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pyside2/+bug/1963583/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960940] Re: [needs-packaging] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-27 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Hello Mathew:

Please note that the software is already packaged and can be found in:

PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/jammy-packages

Bzr:
 * https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ignition-gazebo
 * https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ignition-launch

Could we please revert the changes?
Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960940

Title:
  [needs-packaging] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960940/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960260] Re: [needs-packaging] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-27 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Hello Mathew:

Please note that I've already packaged the software and it is ready for
review. You can access to via:

PPA:
 * https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/jammy-packages
Bzr:
 * https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ignition-rendering
 * https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ignition-gui
 * https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ignition-sensors

Can we please revert the change in the tittle?
Thanks!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960260

Title:
  [needs-packaging] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960260/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1961319] Re: ogre-next SMID fix for ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

2022-02-22 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks Łukasz!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961319

Title:
  ogre-next SMID fix for ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ogre-next/+bug/1961319/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1961319] Re: ogre-next SMID fix for ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

2022-02-17 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
I think I solved it. Attached is the debdiff with the pacth to d/rules
and the bump to d/changelog.

I tested it in all the arches in
https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/ogre-next-
jammy/+packages (bump there from 0ubuntu2 to 0ubuntu2.1 was nothing but
rebuild with all arches enabled in the PPA).

I've also updated the bzr branch, commits 8 and 9
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ogre-next

Thanks.

** Patch added: "ogre-next_2.2.5+dfsg3-0ubuntu2.debdiff"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ogre-next/+bug/1961319/+attachment/5561668/+files/ogre-next_2.2.5+dfsg3-0ubuntu2.debdiff

** Tags added: patch

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961319

Title:
  ogre-next SMID fix for ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ogre-next/+bug/1961319/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960149] Re: Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-17 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
> Okay, the bad news is: it looks like the ogre-next source package
FTBFS on ppc64el and s390x. Can you take a look at the build logs and
see if this is something that can be fixed with a follow-up upload?

Ouk, trivial to fix if I'm not wrong.


> I'd recommend a separate bug for that then.

Here we go https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ogre-
next/+bug/1961319

Thanks again Łukasz.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960149

Title:
  Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960149/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1961319] [NEW] ogre-next SMID fix for ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

2022-02-17 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Public bug reported:

Following up the last comment in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960149:

ogre-next is failing for ppc64el, riscv64, s390x with the following massage in 
the three of them:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ogre-next/2.2.5+dfsg3-0ubuntu1
"""
/<>/ogre-next-2.2.5+dfsg3/OgreMain/include/Math/Array/OgreArrayConfig.h:155:10:
 error: #error "Unknown platform or platform not supported for SIMD. Build Ogre 
without OGRE_USE_SIMD"
  155 | #error "Unknown platform or platform not supported for SIMD. 
Build Ogre without OGRE_USE_SIMD"
  |  ^
"""

The reason is that the configuration leave enabled the OGRE_USE_SIMD for
anything but arm*. The logic should be reverted and only enable it on
x64.

** Affects: ogre-next (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Jose Luis Rivero (j-rivero)
 Status: New


** Tags: jammy

** Changed in: ogre-next (Ubuntu)
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Jose Luis Rivero (j-rivero)

** Description changed:

  Following up the last comment in
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960149:
  
  ogre-next is failing for ppc64el, riscv64, s390x with the following massage 
in the three of them:
+ https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ogre-next/2.2.5+dfsg3-0ubuntu1
  """
  
/<>/ogre-next-2.2.5+dfsg3/OgreMain/include/Math/Array/OgreArrayConfig.h:155:10:
 error: #error "Unknown platform or platform not supported for SIMD. Build Ogre 
without OGRE_USE_SIMD"
-   155 | #error "Unknown platform or platform not supported for SIMD. 
Build Ogre without OGRE_USE_SIMD"
-   |  ^
+   155 | #error "Unknown platform or platform not supported for SIMD. 
Build Ogre without OGRE_USE_SIMD"
+   |  ^
  """
  
  The reason is that the configuration leave enabled the OGRE_USE_SIMD for
  anything but arm*. The logic should be reverted and only enable it on
  x64.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961319

Title:
  ogre-next SMID fix for ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ogre-next/+bug/1961319/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960149] Re: Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-16 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks for review Łukasz.

Fixes and comments inline. With the requested change in the version
number, I'm using a different PPA to upload the version since it is
lower than the one in jammy-package PPA. New one is:
https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/ogre-next-jammy

> Remark re: the .orig tarball. Even though I think this is generally
*fine* but when re-downloading (and auto-repacking) with uscan the
current 2.2.5 tarball, there are a few additional files present in the
tarball in comparison to the tarball used in the PPA upload (there's
some .hgignore, .travis.yaml etc. files in it). I would normally expect
to get the exact same tarball contents from running uscan. In this case
I think it's fine, but this might mean that the debian/copyright exclude
list needs to be modified or, otherwise, no hand modifications done to
the source please.

The explanation of the difference comes from the fact of having that
configuration to exclude some files in my ~/.gbp.conf file. I added what
I found to the d/copyright for completeness.

> * I see that in Debian new a previous version of ogre-next is staged -
ogre-next_2.2.5+dfsg3-1. From what I can tell that version has a
different set of binary packages (libogre-next2.2 instead of the set of
libogrenext*2.2.5 binaries). Would it be possible for you to submit -2
to Debian NEW? In case this gets accepted by Debian, it would be
troublesome if a different set of binary packages was generated there.

I requested to my usual sponsors in Debian to have the package re-
uploaded.

> * Regarding that point above ^ - the binary package name numbers feel
a bit confusing, with their description and purpose not being quite
clear. Are those the 'final' binary package names? If so, could we
expand their individual long descriptions to be a bit more clear on what
their purpose is?

I've added the reason why we are using the whole version in the package
names. In summary: upstream does not guarantee ABI compatibility even in
patch version bumps. The whole information is available in the
README.Debian.

> * The version number needs fixing. 2.2.5+dfsg3-2ubuntu2 means that
Debian has 2.2.5+dfsg3-2 and we introduce an ubuntu delta on top. Since
this package is not accepted into Debian as of yet, the version number
needs to be 2.2.5+dfsg3-0ubuntu2 (or, possibly, -0ubuntu1), with
-0ubuntuX indicating 'Debian doesn't have this yet, but Ubuntu does'.
This makes it easier for us to switch to Debian once the package is
available there as well.

Makes sense to me. Changed to -0ubuntu1.

Thanks again, let me know if I need to fix anything more.

** Description changed:

  Please include the software ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy.
  
  * Package name : ogre-next
  * Version : 2.2.5
  * Upstream Author : https://github.com/OGRECave/ogre-next/blob/master/AUTHORS
  * URL : https://github.com/OGRECave/ogre-next
  * License : MIT
  * Programming Lang: C++
  * Description : Ogre is a 3D graphics rendering engine (next generation)
  
  The Ogre project was divided into Ogre and Ogre-next, this last one
  hosts the old 2.x branches. Both are maintained and developed and
  incompatible with each other.
  
  For more details see:
  https://www.ogre3d.org/about/what-version-to-choose
  
  Packaging for Jammy is ready:
  
  * 2.2.5 in PPA 
https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/jammy-packages/+packages 
(amd64, arm64, armhf).
  * I've also updated to bzr 
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ogre-next
+   * After review comments, follow in 
https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/ogre-next-jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960149

Title:
  Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960149/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960940] [NEW] [needs sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-15 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Public bug reported:

Please include the ignition-gazebo Simulator in Ubuntu Jammy. Ignition
Gazebo is the successor of Gazebo and would be a very valuable addition
for the Robotics community using Ubuntu Jammy LTS.

This issue will require the ignition rendering packages to be in the
repository before we can build it:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960260

The ignition-gazebo simulator uses a small package called ignition-
launch to be triggered. I've including it in this same issue.

* Package name: ignition-gazebo
  Version : 6.4.0
  Upstream Author : Open Robotics
* URL : https://github.com/ignitionrobotics/ign-gazebo
* License : Apache2
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description : Ignition Gazebo is an open source robotics simulator.
Through Ignition Gazebo, users have access to high
fidelity physics, rendering and sensor models.

* Package name: ignition-launch
  Version : 5.0.0
  Upstream Author : Open Robotics
* URL : https://github.com/ignitionrobotics/ign-launch
* License : Apache2
  Programming Lang: C++,
  Description : Ignition Launch, a component of Ignition Robotics,
provides a command line interface to run and manager
application and plugins.

I have done the packaging work for the three of them, they build fine in the 
PPA https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/jammy-packages
for the arches available: amd64, arm64, armhf.

The packages are also available via bzr:
 * https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ignition-gazebo
 * https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ignition-launch

Should have no errors or warnings coming from Lintian as far as I can
say but count me in for fixing anything needed.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Jose Luis Rivero (j-rivero)
 Status: New


** Tags: jammy

** Description changed:

  Please include the ignition-gazebo Simulator in Ubuntu Jammy. Ignition
  Gazebo is the successor of Gazebo and would be a very valuable addition
  for the Robotics community using Ubuntu Jammy LTS.
  
  This issue will require the ignition rendering packages to be in the
  repository before we can build it:
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960260
  
  The ignition-gazebo simulator uses a small package called ignition-
  launch to be triggered. I've including it in this same issue.
  
- 
  * Package name: ignition-gazebo
-   Version : 6.4.0
-   Upstream Author : Open Robotics
+   Version : 6.4.0
+   Upstream Author : Open Robotics
  * URL : https://github.com/ignitionrobotics/ign-gazebo
  * License : Apache2
-   Programming Lang: C++
-   Description : Ignition Gazebo is an open source robotics simulator. 
Through 
- Ignition Gazebo, users have access to high fidelity physics, 
rendering, 
- and sensor models.
+   Programming Lang: C++
+   Description : Ignition Gazebo is an open source robotics simulator.
+ Through Ignition Gazebo, users have access to high
+ fidelity physics, rendering and sensor models.
  
  * Package name: ignition-launch
-   Version : 5.0.0
-   Upstream Author : Open Robotics
+   Version : 5.0.0
+   Upstream Author : Open Robotics
  * URL : https://github.com/ignitionrobotics/ign-launch
  * License : Apache2
-   Programming Lang: C++,
-   Description : Ignition Launch, a component of Ignition Robotics, 
provides a 
- command line interface to run and manager application and 
plugins.
+   Programming Lang: C++,
+   Description : Ignition Launch, a component of Ignition Robotics,
+ provides a command line interface to run and manager
+ application and plugins.
  
  I have done the packaging work for the three of them, they build fine in the 
PPA https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/jammy-packages
  for the arches available: amd64, arm64, armhf.
  
  The packages are also available via bzr:
-  * https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ignition-gazebo
-  * https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ignition-launch
+  * https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ignition-gazebo
+  * https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ignition-launch
  
  Should have no errors or warnings coming from Lintian as far as I can
  say but count me in for fixing anything needed.

** Changed in: ubuntu
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Jose Luis Rivero (j-rivero)

** Summary changed:

- Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy
+ [needs sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960940

Title:
  [needs sponsor] Include ignition-gazebo simulator in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1960260] Re: [needs sponsor] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-15 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Tags removed: needs-packaging

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960260

Title:
  [needs sponsor] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960260/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960260] Re: [needs-packaging] Include ignition rendering stack in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-15 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Description changed:

- Please include the software ignition-rendering in Ubuntu Jammy. It will
- require ogre-next to work, in
+ Please include the ignition rendering stack, composed by three packages
+ ignition-rendering, ignition-gui and ignition-sensors.
+ 
+ It will require ogre-next to work, in
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960149
  
+ 
  * Package name: ignition-rendering
+   Version : 6.1.0
+   Upstream Author : Open Robotics
+ * URL : https://github.com/ignitionrobotics/ign-rendering/
+ * License : Apache2
+   Programming Lang: C++
+   Description : Ignition Rendering is a C++ library designed to provide 
an abstraction for different rendering engines.
+ 
+ * Package name: ignition-gui
+   Version : 6.3.0
+   Upstream Author : Open Robotics
+ * URL : https://github.com/ignitionrobotics/ign-gui
+ * License : Apache2
+   Programming Lang: C++,
+   Description : Ignition GUI ships with several widgets ready to use and 
offers a plugin interface which can be used to add custom widgets.
+ 
+ 
+ * Package name: ignition-sensors
Version : 6.1.0
Upstream Author : Open Robotics
- * URL : https://github.com/ignitionrobotics/ign-rendering/
+ * URL : https://github.com/ignitionrobotics/ign-sensors/
  * License : Apache2
Programming Lang: C++
-   Description : Ignition Rendering is a C++ library designed to provide 
an abstraction for different rendering engines.
+   Description : Ignition Sensors, a component of Ignition Robotics, 
provides numerous sensor models designed to generate realistic data from 
simulation environments.
  
- Ignition Rendering is a C++ library designed to provide an abstraction for
- different rendering engines. It offers unified APIs for creating 3D graphics
- applications.
+ I have done the packaging work for the three of them, they build fine in the 
PPA https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/jammy-packages
+ for the arches available: amd64, arm64, armhf.
  
- Ignition Rendering is a component in the ignition framework, a set of 
libraries
- designed to rapidly develop robot applications.
+ The packages are also available via bzr:
+  * https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ignition-rendering
+  * https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ignition-gui
+  * https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ignition-sensors
+ 
+ Should have no errors or warnings coming from Lintian as far as I can
+ say but count me in for fixing anything needed.

** Summary changed:

- [needs-packaging] Include ignition rendering stack in Ubuntu Jammy
+ Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy

** Summary changed:

- Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy
+ [needs sponsor] Include ignition rendering packages in Ubuntu Jammy

** Description changed:

  Please include the ignition rendering stack, composed by three packages
  ignition-rendering, ignition-gui and ignition-sensors.
  
  It will require ogre-next to work, in
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960149
- 
  
  * Package name: ignition-rendering
    Version : 6.1.0
    Upstream Author : Open Robotics
  * URL : https://github.com/ignitionrobotics/ign-rendering/
  * License : Apache2
    Programming Lang: C++
-   Description : Ignition Rendering is a C++ library designed to provide 
an abstraction for different rendering engines.
+   Description : Ignition Rendering is a C++ library designed to
+ provide an abstraction for different rendering 
+ engines.
  
  * Package name: ignition-gui
-   Version : 6.3.0
-   Upstream Author : Open Robotics
+   Version : 6.3.0
+   Upstream Author : Open Robotics
  * URL : https://github.com/ignitionrobotics/ign-gui
  * License : Apache2
-   Programming Lang: C++,
-   Description : Ignition GUI ships with several widgets ready to use and 
offers a plugin interface which can be used to add custom widgets.
- 
+   Programming Lang: C++,
+   Description : Ignition GUI ships with several widgets ready to use
+ and offers a plugin interface which can be used to 
+ add custom widgets.
  
  * Package name: ignition-sensors
-   Version : 6.1.0
-   Upstream Author : Open Robotics
+   Version : 6.1.0
+   Upstream Author : Open Robotics
  * URL : https://github.com/ignitionrobotics/ign-sensors/
  * License : Apache2
-   Programming Lang: C++
-   Description : Ignition Sensors, a component of Ignition Robotics, 
provides numerous sensor models designed to generate realistic data from 
simulation environments.
+   Programming Lang: C++
+   Description : Ignition Sensors, a component of Ignition Robotics,
+ provides numerous sensor models designed to generate
+ realistic data from 

[Bug 1960149] Re: Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-15 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
> I'll look into this in a moment, thank you for preparing the packages
in the PPA.

Thanks Łukasz. Let me know if I can help.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960149

Title:
  Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960149/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960260] Re: [needs-packaging] Include ignition rendering stack in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-15 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Summary changed:

- [needs-packaging] Include ignition-rendering in Ubuntu Jammy
+ [needs-packaging] Include ignition rendering stack in Ubuntu Jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960260

Title:
  [needs-packaging] Include ignition rendering stack in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960260/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960266] Re: [needs sponsor] Sync to Jammy Gazebo11 simulator + dependencies (DART, ignitions) from Debian Unstable

2022-02-11 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks so much Sebastien!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960266

Title:
  [needs sponsor] Sync to Jammy  Gazebo11 simulator + dependencies
  (DART, ignitions) from Debian Unstable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960266/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960266] Re: [needs sponsor] Sync to Jammy Gazebo11 simulator + dependencies (DART, ignitions) from Debian Unstable

2022-02-10 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Thanks Sebastien for the comment. I was checking my Debian QA page
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=jriv...@osrfoundation.org and
did not check the -proposed pocket, I see now that the packages are
there using rmadison (not sure if there is a better dashboard for the
check).

I'm available to help with the riscv64 failure in DART if finally there
is a valid bug there.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960266

Title:
  [needs sponsor] Sync to Jammy  Gazebo11 simulator + dependencies
  (DART, ignitions) from Debian Unstable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960266/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1889851] Re: Driver QMysql can't be loaded

2022-02-09 Thread Jose
I would like to report the same problem happening again with the latest version 
of libmysqlclient21. 
I am speaking about this bug:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/63307453/cannot-allocate-memory-in-static-tls-block-in-a-python-flask-application

Which again was solved downgrading to the previous version:
8.0.28-0ubuntu0.20.04.3

Thanks :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1889851

Title:
  Driver QMysql can't be loaded

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mysql-8.0/+bug/1889851/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960149] Re: [needs-packaging] Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-07 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
I added packaging in:

* 2.2.5 in PPA 
https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/jammy-packages/+packages 
(amd64, arm64, armhf).
* I've also updated to bzr https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ogre-next

** Description changed:

  Please include the software ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy.
  
  * Package name : ogre-next
  * Version : 2.2.5
  * Upstream Author : https://github.com/OGRECave/ogre-next/blob/master/AUTHORS
  * URL : https://github.com/OGRECave/ogre-next
  * License : MIT
  * Programming Lang: C++
  * Description : Ogre is a 3D graphics rendering engine (next generation)
  
  The Ogre project was divided into Ogre and Ogre-next, this last one
  hosts the old 2.x branches. Both are maintained and developed and
  incompatible with each other.
  
  For more details see:
  https://www.ogre3d.org/about/what-version-to-choose
+ 
+ Packaging for Jammy is ready:
+ 
+ * 2.2.5 in PPA 
https://launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+archive/ubuntu/jammy-packages/+packages 
(amd64, arm64, armhf).
+ * I've also updated to bzr 
https://code.launchpad.net/~j-rivero/+junk/ogre-next

** Summary changed:

- [needs-packaging] Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy
+ Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960149

Title:
  Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960149/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960266] [NEW] [needs sponsor] Sync to Jammy Gazebo11 simulator + dependencies (DART, ignitions) from Debian Unstable

2022-02-07 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Public bug reported:

Hello:

I'm the maintainer of Gazebo and all the related dependencies listed her
in Debian. There were some transitions affecting Gazebo in the last
months, one affecting DART library (a dependency of Gazebo) and another
important transition to duplicate the ignition libraries that needs
Gazebo to run (to unblock new ignition of those libraries which are
incompatible with Gazebo).

Checking Ubuntu auto migration excuses I found that, ignition-common
seems to be blocked and msgs5 too:

* 
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#ignition-common
* 
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#ignition-msgs5

They had problems in Debian some weeks ago but are now fully clean (all
them are also in testing except DART that has no blocker right now).

List of source packages and versions to sync from Debian unstable

# src:package | debian version | Ubuntu comment on Jammy versions

- dart 6.12.1+dfsg4-10 (Jammy has 6.9.5-4u1)
- gazebo 11.9.1+dfsg-8 (Jammy has 11.9.1+dfsg-2 needs 8 revision to use new 
dependencies)
- ignition-common3 3.14.0+dfsg-5 (Jammy has no ignition-common3 but 
ignition-common)
- ignition-common 4.4.0+ds-5 (Jammy has 3.14.0+dfsg-1)
- ignition-fuel-tools4 4.4.0+ds-3 (Jammy has no ignition-fuel-tools4 but 
ignition-fuel-tools)
- ignition-fuel-tools 7.0.0+ds-2 (Jammy has 4.1.0+dfsg-6)
- ignition-msgs5 5.8.1+ds-2 (Jammy has no ignition-msgs5 but ignition-msgs)
- ignition-msgs 8.2.0+ds-1 (Jammy 5.1.0+dfsg-7)
- ignition-transport 11.0.0+ds-3 (Jammy has 8.0.0+dfsg-3)
- ignition-transport8 8.2.1+ds-2 (Jammy has no ignition-transport8 but 
ignition-transport)

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: jammy

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960266

Title:
  [needs sponsor] Sync to Jammy  Gazebo11 simulator + dependencies
  (DART, ignitions) from Debian Unstable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960266/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960149] Re: [needs-packaging] Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-07 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
** Changed in: ubuntu
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Jose Luis Rivero (j-rivero)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960149

Title:
  [needs-packaging] Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960149/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960260] [NEW] [needs-packaging] Include ignition-rendering in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-07 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Public bug reported:

Please include the software ignition-rendering in Ubuntu Jammy. It will
require ogre-next to work, in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960149

* Package name: ignition-rendering
  Version : 6.1.0
  Upstream Author : Open Robotics
* URL : https://github.com/ignitionrobotics/ign-rendering/
* License : Apache2
  Programming Lang: C++
  Description : Ignition Rendering is a C++ library designed to provide an 
abstraction for different rendering engines.

Ignition Rendering is a C++ library designed to provide an abstraction for
different rendering engines. It offers unified APIs for creating 3D graphics
applications.

Ignition Rendering is a component in the ignition framework, a set of libraries
designed to rapidly develop robot applications.

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Assignee: Jose Luis Rivero (j-rivero)
 Status: New


** Tags: jammy needs-packaging

** Changed in: ubuntu
 Assignee: (unassigned) => Jose Luis Rivero (j-rivero)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960260

Title:
  [needs-packaging] Include ignition-rendering in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960260/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1960149] [NEW] Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy

2022-02-05 Thread Jose Luis Rivero
Public bug reported:

Please include the software ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy.

* Package name : ogre-next
* Version : 2.2.5
* Upstream Author : https://github.com/OGRECave/ogre-next/blob/master/AUTHORS
* URL : https://github.com/OGRECave/ogre-next
* License : MIT
* Programming Lang: C++
* Description : Ogre is a 3D graphics rendering engine (next generation)

The Ogre project was divided into Ogre and Ogre-next, this last one
hosts the old 2.x branches. Both are maintained and developed and
incompatible with each other.

For more details see:
https://www.ogre3d.org/about/what-version-to-choose

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: jammy needs-packaging

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960149

Title:
  Include ogre-next in Ubuntu Jammy

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1960149/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1959515] [NEW] While installing Ubuntu in the final state I got the message: " Unable to install GRUB in /dev/sda

2022-01-30 Thread Jose Abreu
Public bug reported:

Unable to install GRUB in /dev/sda
executing grub-install /dev/sda ·failed"
This is a fatal error

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
Package: ubiquity 21.10.10
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-19.19-generic 5.13.14
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-19-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: wl zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu70
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.465
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sun Jan 30 17:03:57 2022
InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed 
maybe-ubiquity quiet splash ---
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Release amd64 (20211012)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=es_ES.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=es_ES.UTF-8
 LC_NUMERIC=C.UTF-8
RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks.
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug impish ubiquity-21.10.10 ubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959515

Title:
  While installing Ubuntu in the final state I got the message: " Unable
  to install GRUB in /dev/sda

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1959515/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1958435] Re: Icons on Dock get stuck in Dragging Mode

2022-01-20 Thread Jose S
Though hardly an ideal solution, I can confirm that this bug is no
longer present on 20.04.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958435

Title:
  Icons on Dock get stuck in Dragging Mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1958435/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1958435] Re: Icons on Dock get stuck in Dragging Mode

2022-01-19 Thread Jose S
Additional info:
$ gsettings list-recursively org.gnome.shell
org.gnome.shell enabled-extensions ['sound-output-device-choo...@kgshank.net']
org.gnome.shell command-history ['r']
org.gnome.shell remember-mount-password false
org.gnome.shell always-show-log-out true
org.gnome.shell had-bluetooth-devices-setup false
org.gnome.shell looking-glass-history @as []
org.gnome.shell disable-user-extensions false
org.gnome.shell app-picker-view uint32 0
org.gnome.shell disable-extension-version-validation true
org.gnome.shell development-tools true
org.gnome.shell enable-hot-corners false
org.gnome.shell favorite-apps ['org.gnome.Terminal.desktop', 'firefox.desktop', 
'discord.desktop', 'steam.desktop', 'spotify_spotify.desktop', 
'org.remmina.Remmina.desktop', 'net.lutris.Lutris.desktop', 
'gnome-control-center.desktop', 'org.gnome.Nautilus.desktop', 
'signal-desktop.desktop', 'org.gnome.Screenshot.desktop']
org.gnome.shell.keyboard keyboard-type 'touch'
org.gnome.shell.keybindings toggle-message-tray ['v', 'm']
org.gnome.shell.keybindings open-application-menu ['F10']
org.gnome.shell.keybindings pause-resume-tweens @as []
org.gnome.shell.keybindings toggle-application-view ['a']
org.gnome.shell.keybindings focus-active-notification ['n']
org.gnome.shell.keybindings toggle-overview ['s']

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958435

Title:
  Icons on Dock get stuck in Dragging Mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1958435/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1958435] [NEW] Icons on Dock get stuck in Dragging Mode

2022-01-19 Thread Jose S
Public bug reported:

$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 18.04.6 LTS
Release:18.04

$ apt-cache policy gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock
gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock:
  Installed: 0.9.1ubuntu18.04.3
  Candidate: 0.9.1ubuntu18.04.3
  Version table:
 *** 0.9.1ubuntu18.04.3 500
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main amd64 
Packages
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main i386 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 0.9.1 500
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages
500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main i386 Packages

What I expect to happen:
When I drag an icon on the Dock, I expect the dragging to finish once I release 
the mouse.

What happened instead:
The icon gets stuck in dragging mode. When my mouse clicks on the icon that was 
previously dragged, the icon gets stuck to the mouse cursor as if I were 
dragging it.

Related bug reports:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1880764

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock 0.9.1ubuntu18.04.3
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-94.106~18.04.1-generic 5.4.157
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-94-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.27
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Wed Jan 19 12:38:15 2022
InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-10-04 (837 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 (20190805)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic

** Description changed:

  $ lsb_release -rd
  Description:  Ubuntu 18.04.6 LTS
  Release:  18.04
  
- $ apt-cache policy gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock 
+ $ apt-cache policy gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock
  gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock:
-   Installed: 0.9.1ubuntu18.04.3
-   Candidate: 0.9.1ubuntu18.04.3
-   Version table:
-  *** 0.9.1ubuntu18.04.3 500
- 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main amd64 
Packages
- 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main i386 
Packages
- 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
-  0.9.1 500
- 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages
- 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main i386 Packages
+   Installed: 0.9.1ubuntu18.04.3
+   Candidate: 0.9.1ubuntu18.04.3
+   Version table:
+  *** 0.9.1ubuntu18.04.3 500
+ 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main amd64 
Packages
+ 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main i386 
Packages
+ 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
+  0.9.1 500
+ 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages
+ 500 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main i386 Packages
  
  What I expect to happen:
  When I drag an icon on the Dock, I expect the dragging to finish once I 
release the mouse.
  
  What happened instead:
- The icon gets stuck in dragging mode. When my mouse moves over the icon that 
was previously dragged, the icon gets stuck to the mouse cursor as if I were 
dragging it.
+ The icon gets stuck in dragging mode. When my mouse clicks on the icon that 
was previously dragged, the icon gets stuck to the mouse cursor as if I were 
dragging it.
  
  Related bug reports:
  
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1880764
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock 0.9.1ubuntu18.04.3
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-94.106~18.04.1-generic 5.4.157
  Uname: Linux 5.4.0-94-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.27
  Architecture: amd64
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Wed Jan 19 12:38:15 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-10-04 (837 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.3 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20190805)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
-  TERM=xterm-256color
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
-  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
+  TERM=xterm-256color
+  PATH=(custom, no user)
+  XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
+  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
+  SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1958435

Title:
  Icons on Dock get stuck in Dragging Mode

To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1880764] Re: Dragging icons frozen in place without finishing

2022-01-17 Thread Jose S
Hello, I am affected by the same bug.

The output of your command is the following:

gsettings list-recursively org.gnome.shell
org.gnome.shell enabled-extensions ['sound-output-device-choo...@kgshank.net']
org.gnome.shell command-history ['r']
org.gnome.shell remember-mount-password false
org.gnome.shell always-show-log-out true
org.gnome.shell had-bluetooth-devices-setup false
org.gnome.shell looking-glass-history @as []
org.gnome.shell disable-user-extensions false
org.gnome.shell app-picker-view uint32 0
org.gnome.shell disable-extension-version-validation true
org.gnome.shell development-tools true
org.gnome.shell enable-hot-corners false
org.gnome.shell favorite-apps ['org.gnome.Terminal.desktop', 'firefox.desktop', 
'discord.desktop', 'steam.desktop', 'spotify_spotify.desktop', 
'org.remmina.Remmina.desktop', 'net.lutris.Lutris.desktop', 
'gnome-control-center.desktop', 'org.gnome.Nautilus.desktop', 
'signal-desktop.desktop', 'org.gnome.Screenshot.desktop']
org.gnome.shell.keyboard keyboard-type 'touch'
org.gnome.shell.keybindings toggle-message-tray ['v', 'm']
org.gnome.shell.keybindings open-application-menu ['F10']
org.gnome.shell.keybindings pause-resume-tweens @as []
org.gnome.shell.keybindings toggle-application-view ['a']
org.gnome.shell.keybindings focus-active-notification ['n']
org.gnome.shell.keybindings toggle-overview ['s']


** Changed in: gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock (Ubuntu)
   Status: Expired => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1880764

Title:
  Dragging icons frozen in place without finishing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock/+bug/1880764/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1899294] Re: Não consigo atualizar

2021-12-31 Thread JOSE LIMA DA SILVA JUNIOR
enho instalado o Ubuntu 20.04 LTS e recebi para atualizar o Ubuntu mas
não consegui Ocorreu um problema sem solução, enquanto estava calculando
uma atualização descrito pelo sistema dessa forma: Ocorreu um problema
sem solução, enquanto estava calculando a atualização.

 Isto deve ter sido causado por:
 * Pacotes de software não oficiais nao disponibilizados por Ubuntu
Por favor use a ferramenta 'ppa-purge' do pacote ppa-purge 
para remover software do Launchpad PPA e 
tente a atualização novamente.

Se nada disto servir, então por favor comunique a falha usando o comando
'ubuntu-bug ubuntu-release-upgrader-core' no terminal. Se você quiser
investigar isto por si os ficheiros de registro em '/var/log/dist-
upgrade' contém detalhes sobre a atualização. Olhe especialmente para
'main.log' e 'apt.log'.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1899294

Title:
  Não consigo atualizar

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1899294/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1952669] [NEW] package nvidia-dkms-470 470.86-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to install/upgrade

2021-11-29 Thread Edgar Jose SIlva Rengel
Public bug reported:

I was upgrading some packages with Synaptic and the aforementioned one
failed claiming that it had some dependency issues.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: nvidia-dkms-470 470.86-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
Uname: Linux 5.15.2-051502-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
Date: Mon Nov 29 17:43:14 2021
ErrorMessage: installed nvidia-dkms-470 package post-installation script 
subprocess returned error exit status 10
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-11-15 (13 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819)
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.8, Python 3.8.10, python3-minimal, 
3.8.2-0ubuntu2
PythonDetails: N/A
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu3
 apt  2.0.6
SourcePackage: nvidia-graphics-drivers-470
Title: package nvidia-dkms-470 470.86-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to 
install/upgrade: installed nvidia-dkms-470 package post-installation script 
subprocess returned error exit status 10
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package focal need-duplicate-check

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952669

Title:
  package nvidia-dkms-470 470.86-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 failed to
  install/upgrade

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-470/+bug/1952669/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1952543] [NEW] sudo do-release-upgrade -d error

2021-11-27 Thread Jose J. Gamez
Public bug reported:

I am new to linux and don't know what other details to include. My
apologies.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04
Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:20.04.36
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-40.44~20.04.2-generic 5.11.22
Uname: Linux 5.11.0-40-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.21
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: skip
CrashDB: ubuntu
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Sat Nov 27 20:23:33 2021
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-11-15 (13 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819)
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=xterm-256color
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2021-11-28 (0 days ago)

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade focal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952543

Title:
  sudo do-release-upgrade -d   error

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1952543/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1948055] Re: Landscape Repository Profile Lost After Access Group Change

2021-10-22 Thread Jose Ortiz
I reported this on the the wrong thread.

I re-posted under the correct thread.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/landscape/+bug/1948455

You can close this one.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948055

Title:
  Landscape Repository Profile Lost After Access Group Change

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1948055/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1948055] [NEW] Landscape Repository Profile Lost After Access Group Change

2021-10-21 Thread Jose Ortiz
Public bug reported:

On standalone (on-prem) landscape web page, I created a new access
group, and bulk assigned the new access group to several computers,
landscape then generated a bulk activity to "apply repository profiles".
The repository profile file for these computers in
/etc/apt/sources.list.d/ was changed to .SAVENo new repository
profile .LIST file was created.   I had to manually move the .SAVE back
to .LIST to restore the file.   Seems like landscape wants to have a
tight link between the repo profile and the access group, when it should
not.   My understanding is that the repo profile should be tightly
linked to the Tag only.   I assume if I remove any reference to the
access group in the repo profile through landscape-api that this problem
might go away.   However, I don't think the Landscape software should
care about that association.

OS:

Description:Ubuntu 18.04.5 LTS
Release:18.04

Package details:

Unsure of specific landscape package that executes the landscape Web
Server activities described above, so just used this landscape package
to provide you with a reference:

$apt-cache policy landscape-common
landscape-common:
  Installed: 18.03~1075~git.256ad02~ubuntu18.04.1
  Candidate: 18.03~1075~git.256ad02~ubuntu18.04.1
  Version table:
 *** 18.03~1075~git.256ad02~ubuntu18.04.1 500
500 https://archive.landscape.canonical.com bionic/main amd64 Packages
500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/landscape/19.10/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 18.01-0ubuntu3.5 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates/main amd64 Packages
 18.01-0ubuntu3 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/main amd64 Packages

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1948055

Title:
  Landscape Repository Profile Lost After Access Group Change

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1948055/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1943097] Re: Kernel 5.13 broke my Ubuntu 21.10 on RPI4 8Gb

2021-09-26 Thread Jose Netto
Thanks Juerg,

Now it is booting... kernel 5.13.

But now Desktop is frizzing with no return, no mouse movement and no
keyboard response. Once during sudo apt update, other during sudo apt
install vlc and other time during updating Region and Language...

So I gave up...

What do I do, Open another report???

Thanks again,

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943097

Title:
  Kernel 5.13 broke my Ubuntu 21.10 on RPI4 8Gb

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1943097/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1942695] Re: DeskTop freezes for up to 5 seconds the first keystroke on Gnome terminal after boot.

2021-09-19 Thread Jose Netto
Issue Update.

Now desktop freeze is taking about 8:23 secs...  After 14 days from
first report and after a new install and updates... update...

As you can see on image attached System Monitor from 38 sec to 45 sec
one core remains 100%.

And only Gnome Terminal an System Monitor are running on Desktop.

Has anybody seen this issue on any platform?

Thanks,
 


** Attachment added: "Desktop screen capture"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1942695/+attachment/5526299/+files/Terminal%20freeze1%202021-09-19%2014-18-21.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942695

Title:
  DeskTop freezes for up to 5 seconds the first keystroke on Gnome
  terminal after boot.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-raspi/+bug/1942695/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1943097] Re: Kernel 5.13 broke my Ubuntu 21.10 on RPI4 8Gb

2021-09-19 Thread Jose Netto
Hi Juerg,

The workaround is not working for me.

I took a new .img from Daily Builds (kernel 5.13 already installed) and
made a SDCard install.

sudo apt update

sudo apt install linux-modules-extra-5.13.0-1006-raspi

rebooted.

Working.

Using another OS, in gparted copied SDCard to a SSD.

This system does not boot, only a black screen.


Hi Satmandu,

You are right, theorically. Indeed the system does not boot.

Thanks to all,

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943097

Title:
  Kernel 5.13 broke my Ubuntu 21.10 on RPI4 8Gb

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1943097/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1943097] Re: Kernel 5.13 broke my Ubuntu 21.10 on RPI4 8Gb

2021-09-19 Thread Jose Netto
Hi Juerg,

The workaround is not working for me.

I took a new .img from Daily Builds (kernel 5.13 already installed) and
made a SDCard install.

sudo apt update

sudo apt install linux-modules-extra-5.13.0-1006-raspi

rebooted.

Working.

Using another OS, in gparted copied SDCard to a SSD.

This system does not boot, only a black screen.


Hi Satmandu,

You are right, theorically. Indeed the system does not boot.

Thanks to all,

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1943097

Title:
  Kernel 5.13 broke my Ubuntu 21.10 on RPI4 8Gb

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1943097/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1919083] Re: [FFe] KDE Frameworks 5.80.0 into Hirsute archive

2021-09-12 Thread Jose Manuel Santamaria Lema
** Changed in: plasma-framework (Ubuntu)
   Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1919083

Title:
  [FFe] KDE Frameworks 5.80.0 into Hirsute archive

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-framework/+bug/1919083/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >