[Bug 2056655] Re: Fullscreen mode dosent display image fullscreen

2024-03-09 Thread Joseph Matheney
I reported this in 2021 (over 3 versions ago) and the bug has still not been addressed... https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lximage-qt/+bug/1990427 I am re-reporting the bug because the original bug report was marked as expired. -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 2056655] Re: Fullscreen mode dosent display image fullscreen

2024-03-09 Thread Joseph Matheney
this is what i expect when i want to full screen the image ** Attachment added: "tux1920full.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lximage-qt/+bug/2056655/+attachment/5754426/+files/tux1920full.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 2056655] Re: Fullscreen mode dosent display image fullscreen

2024-03-09 Thread Joseph Matheney
this is what i get when i 'full screen' the image ** Attachment added: "tux1920sm.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lximage-qt/+bug/2056655/+attachment/5754425/+files/tux1920sm.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 2056655] [NEW] Fullscreen mode dosent display image fullscreen

2024-03-09 Thread Joseph Matheney
Public bug reported: I am using lximage-qt 0.17.0 When I place the application in fullscreen mode small images will be displayed at their original size rather than being displayed as fullscreen While displaying a small image at a 1:1 ratio is a nice option, I would have expected an option to

[Bug 2056655] Re: Fullscreen mode dosent display image fullscreen

2024-03-09 Thread Joseph Matheney
This is the original image ** Attachment added: "tux256.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lximage-qt/+bug/2056655/+attachment/5754424/+files/tux256.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1363640] Re: Missnamed, should be 1.2

2016-01-31 Thread Joseph Matheney
** Changed in: sdl-ttf2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1363640 Title: Missnamed, should be 1.2 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 1540105] Re: package libsdl-ttf2.0-0:amd64 2.0.11-3 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

2016-01-31 Thread Joseph Matheney
** Changed in: sdl-ttf2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1540105 Title: package libsdl-ttf2.0-0:amd64 2.0.11-3 failed to install/upgrade:

[Bug 1363640] Re: Missnamed, should be 1.2

2016-01-31 Thread Joseph Matheney
This is the version number for sdl-ttf... it has nothing to so with the base sdl package's version number. If you look at the versioning scheme for the source tarballs it become apparent https://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_ttf/release/ As far as dev packages go, there is libsdl-ttf2.0-dev which

[Bug 1094112] Re: .pc file is missing in precise

2016-01-31 Thread Joseph Matheney
Trusty now contains the .pc file ** Changed in: sdl-ttf2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094112 Title: .pc file is missing in

[Bug 1540105] Re: package libsdl-ttf2.0-0:amd64 2.0.11-3 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

2016-01-31 Thread Joseph Matheney
I believe the cause of this was failure to update package list prior to performing an upgrade. I think this is also invalid as it has nothing to do with sdl-ttf2.0 package but marked as incomplete for now incase further information can be provided, or additional duplicates start pouring in. --

[Bug 1439910] [NEW] Non-interactive mode fails at EULA

2015-04-02 Thread Joseph Matheney
Public bug reported: When I run this shell script: #!/bin/bash export DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive sudo add-apt-repository -y ppa:ubuntu-wine/ppa sudo apt-get -y update sudo apt-get -y install wine1.7 My install still pops up asking me to accept the EULA... I realize an EULA is important, but

[Bug 1179367] Re: Customizing the live user skel

2013-07-31 Thread Joseph Matheney
my guess is that the directory exists in your squashed filesystem by mistake. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1179367 Title: Customizing the live user skel To manage notifications

[Bug 1179367] Re: Customizing the live user skel

2013-07-01 Thread Joseph Matheney
I dont think this is a bug, if you look at the user-setup-apply script from raring; Line 213: if [ -x $ROOT/usr/sbin/adduser ]; then $log $chroot $ROOT adduser --disabled-password --gecos $RET $UIDOPT $ENCRYPT_HOME_OPT $USER /dev/null || true else $log $chroot $ROOT useradd -c

[Bug 1166401] Re: [Kubuntu 13.04 beta 2]Monitor goes into PowerSaving mode during installation

2013-07-01 Thread Joseph Matheney
This sounds more like the kernels built in screen save option. It can be disabled with 'setterm -powersave off -blank 0' I would write a patch for this, but in my opinion, I think its much better to destroy the users install over destroying the users monitor. Therefore I propose that this bug

[Bug 1153908] Re: fail to create live session user when user-setup/encrypt-home=true is passed

2013-07-01 Thread Joseph Matheney
There are a few things that need to be checked, in the initramfs we should have modules for aes cbc and or ecb (I think their built into the kernel so no modules needed) We also need to have encryptfs-utils and cryptsetup stuff in the initramfs. I have only 32 bit architecture available to me, im

[Bug 1153908] Re: fail to create live session user when user-setup/encrypt-home=true is passed

2013-07-01 Thread Joseph Matheney
** Changed in: casper (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1153908 Title: fail to create live session user when user-setup/encrypt-home=true is

[Bug 1153908] Re: fail to create live session user when user-setup/encrypt-home=true is passed

2013-07-01 Thread Joseph Matheney
This also affects the ubuntu-13.04-desktop-i386.iso -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1153908 Title: fail to create live session user when user-setup/encrypt-home=true is passed To

[Bug 1196327] Re: package man-db 2.6.5-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

2013-06-30 Thread Joseph Matheney
/proc is not mounted, mount it 'sudo mount -t proc none /proc' and run 'sudo apt-get install -f' -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196327 Title: package man-db 2.6.5-2 failed to

[Bug 1196147] Re: Community wiki page RadeonDriver has some typos

2013-06-29 Thread Joseph Matheney
I suppose the real bug lies in the exact nature of why you could not edit it yourself. ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) = Joseph Matheney (pfifo-fast) ** Changed in: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) Status: New = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 407435] Re: virtual box crash synaptics during reinstallation

2011-06-19 Thread Joseph Matheney
9.04 has reached EOL. ** Changed in: sdl-ttf2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/407435 Title: virtual box crash synaptics during reinstallation

[Bug 647759] Re: Update to new upstream release

2011-06-19 Thread Joseph Matheney
) = Joseph Matheney (pfifo-fast) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/647759 Title: Update to new upstream release To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu

[Bug 780130] Re: Missing pkg-config information

2011-06-19 Thread Joseph Matheney
It appears that prior to 2.0.10 there wasn't a .pc file included. So this bug is invalid for the current version, and obsolete for the next release. ** Changed in: sdl-ttf2.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 780130] [NEW] Missing pkg-config information

2011-05-09 Thread Joseph Matheney
Public bug reported: I am using Ubuntu 11.04 i386 (this also happens in pre-alpha oneiric) The file /usr/lib/pkgconfig/SDL_ttf.pc seems to have been omitted in the *-dev package and is causing problems with building SDL packages. I have recently installed SDL_ttf from source and this file was

[Bug 780131] [NEW] Missing pkg-config information

2011-05-09 Thread Joseph Matheney
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: lua5.1 I am using Ubuntu 11.04 i386 (this also happens in pre-alpha oneiric) The file /usr/lib/pkgconfig/lua.pc seems to have been omitted in the *-dev package and is causing problems with building lua packages. I have recently installed lua from source