[Bug 2061017] Re: lxd-installer: permission error not handled and lxd snap not installed

2024-05-09 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Also affects: lxd-installer (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: lxd-installer (Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: lxd-installer (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Déziel (sdeziel) -- You received this bug

[Bug 2064458] Re: Merge ruby-defaults from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-08 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Changed in: ruby-defaults (Ubuntu) Milestone: ubuntu-24.05 => ubuntu-24.07 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064458 Title: Merge ruby-defaults from Debian unstable for oracular

[Bug 2064459] Re: Merge ruby-ethon from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-08 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Changed in: ruby-ethon (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064459 Title: Merge ruby-ethon from Debian unsta

[Bug 2064461] Re: Merge runc from Debian unstable for oracular

2024-05-08 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064461 Title: Merge runc from Debian unsta

[Bug 2064930] Re: dnsmasq cannot execute at systemctl

2024-05-07 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and trying to make Ubuntu better. I tried to install dnsmasq in a brand new LXD container running Noble (24.04) and I was not able to reproduce the failure you mentioned: root@dnsmasq-install:~# apt install dnsmasq Reading package lists... Done

[Bug 2064914] Re: Windows guest hangs after reboot from the guest OS

2024-05-07 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Also affects: qemu (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064914 Title: Windows guest hangs after reboot from the guest OS To

[Bug 2064363] Re: thunderbird snap on live systems "already running" but not responsive

2024-05-07 Thread Douglas Lucas
@u-jjohansen, I had an interesting result today. I powered off my live 24.04 Lubuntu installation and rebooting into a new live 24.04 Lubuntu installation. This time, however, I installed Thunderbird stable as a .deb from Mozilla. And I ran my old script: ``` $ cat thunder.sh cp -R

[Bug 2059952] Re: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service

2024-05-07 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
I am adding the test results for Mantic. Those tests confirm that the daemon doesn't run on Mantic, which makes this release unaffected by this issue. ** Attachment added: "mantic-test-results.tar.xz"

[Bug 2051574] Re: gnome-shell-portal-helper crashed with SIGTRAP in waitUntilSyncedOrDie() from WebKit::XDGDBusProxy::launch()

2024-05-07 Thread Lucas
Any workaround for this? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051574 Title: gnome-shell-portal-helper crashed with SIGTRAP in waitUntilSyncedOrDie() from WebKit::XDGDBusProxy::launch()

[Bug 2040483] Re: AppArmor denies crun sending signals to containers (stop, kill)

2024-05-06 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
I also see that you are patching golang-github-containers-common. Does that mean that no patch in libpod is needed? If the answer is yes, we need to mark the libpod tasks as Invalid. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2040483] Re: AppArmor denies crun sending signals to containers (stop, kill)

2024-05-06 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Hi Tomáš, Thanks for investigating this issue and providing the patch (MP) to fix it in Noble. However, before fixing it in Noble, we need to fix it in Oracular (development release). Would you like to provide a patch or MP targeting Oracular? -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 2022390] Re: Keep the -dev binary package in sync with Debian

2024-05-06 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
The src:runc regressions above helped me to identify an error in the package. I forgot to remove the basic-smoke test which tries to make use of the runc binary (now provided by src:runc-app). In order to fix this, I uploaded src:runc again to Focal (1.1.7-0ubuntu1~20.04.4), Jammy

[Bug 2040460] Re: MRE updates of container-stack for noble

2024-05-06 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Now that src:runc-app was accepted from NEW in all supported releases, we are ready to land the other updates in -proposed to verify everything together. Please, SRU vanguard, could you check and move the uploads from -unapproved to -proposed? -- You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 2064139] Re: not building for arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

2024-05-02 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
It indeed looks like an issue (but it is not :p). After discussion with the Server team, we will leave it like this in Noble (there is no regression), and in OO series we will revisit the usage of a build profile to not build the runc binary package. -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 2064122] Re: package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.36-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 failed to install/upgrade: installed mysql-server-8.0 package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1

2024-05-02 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks for your time reporting this bug and trying to make Ubuntu better. I see the mysql-server is installed alongside mysql-workbench-community (which is not in the Ubuntu archive and is not supported), this interaction is untested and might pose you some unexpected behavior. The mysql error

[Bug 1181666] Re: gnome-shell randomly blocks mouse clicks from working in app windows

2024-05-02 Thread Lucas
New install of ubuntu 24.04, causes this issue -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1181666 Title: gnome-shell randomly blocks mouse clicks from working in app windows To manage

[Bug 2064363] Re: thunderbird snap on live systems "already running" but not responsive

2024-05-01 Thread Douglas Lucas
@u-jjohansen, You ask: ``` what kind of configuration have you done? ``` I just: ``` sudo apt update sudo apt install thunderbird cp -R /media/lubuntu/drive/startup/thunderbird /home/lubuntu/snap/thunderbird/common/.thunderbird cp /media/lubuntu/drive/startup/lubuntu_thunder/profiles.ini

[Bug 2051574] Re: gnome-shell-portal-helper crashed with SIGTRAP in waitUntilSyncedOrDie() from WebKit::XDGDBusProxy::launch()

2024-05-01 Thread Lucas
Issue present on installed today 24.04, during initial boot -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051574 Title: gnome-shell-portal-helper crashed with SIGTRAP in waitUntilSyncedOrDie()

[Bug 2064363] Re: thunderbird snap on live systems "already running" but not responsive

2024-04-30 Thread Douglas Lucas
@u-jjohansen ``` $ mount sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime) proc on /proc type proc (rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime) udev on /dev type devtmpfs (rw,nosuid,relatime,size=7984072k,nr_inodes=1996018,mode=755,inode64) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts

[Bug 2064363] Re: thunderbird snap on live systems "already running" but not responsive

2024-04-30 Thread Douglas Lucas
Oh also, by using ``` ~/.thunderbird/p0dln6zn.default$ ls -A ``` I just noticed there's a .parentlock right now in that directory ... in case it's relevant -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2064363] Re: thunderbird snap on live systems "already running" but not responsive

2024-04-30 Thread Douglas Lucas
@u-jjohansen: ``` $ mount | grep overlay /cow on / type overlay (rw,relatime,lowerdir=/filesystem.squashfs,upperdir=/cow/upper,workdir=/cow/work,uuid=on,xino=off,nouserxattr) /cow on /var/snap/firefox/common/host-hunspell type overlay

[Bug 2046844] Re: AppArmor user namespace creation restrictions cause many applications to crash with SIGTRAP

2024-04-30 Thread Douglas Lucas
@u-jjohansen: ``` $ sudo dmesg | grep DENIED [ 20.729222] audit: type=1400 audit(1714359674.872:42): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" class="file" profile="snap-update-ns.firefox" name="/usr/local/share/" pid=2002 comm="6" requested_mask="r" denied_mask="r" fsuid=0 ouid=0 [ 20.743227]

[Bug 2046844] Re: AppArmor user namespace creation restrictions cause many applications to crash with SIGTRAP

2024-04-30 Thread Douglas Lucas
@u-jjohansen: Also, I'm having this Thunderbird problem going on simultaneously -- https://forum.snapcraft.io/t/unexplained-thunderbird-already-running- but-is-not-responding-message/39990 -- which might be related to the issues from my Chrome comments? -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 2046844] Re: AppArmor user namespace creation restrictions cause many applications to crash with SIGTRAP

2024-04-30 Thread Douglas Lucas
@u-jjohansen: Yes, live environment only. Sorry, I thought I'd included that in my first comment but now I see that I neglected to do so. I added an EDIT: to my first comment to make it clear. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2046844] Re: AppArmor user namespace creation restrictions cause many applications to crash with SIGTRAP

2024-04-30 Thread Douglas Lucas
@jjohansen: ``` $ sudo aa-status apparmor module is loaded. 56 profiles are loaded. 54 profiles are in enforce mode. /snap/snapd/21465/usr/lib/snapd/snap-confine /snap/snapd/21465/usr/lib/snapd/snap-confine//mount-namespace-capture-helper /usr/lib/snapd/snap-confine

[Bug 2060566] Re: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty

2024-04-30 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-trusty ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-trusty -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060566 Title: Add

[Bug 2046844] Re: AppArmor user namespace creation restrictions cause many applications to crash with SIGTRAP

2024-04-29 Thread Douglas Lucas
I seem to have the same apparmor problem with Chrome under Lubuntu 24.04. From "$ journalctl | grep apparmor | grep chrome" I got info="Userns create restricted - failed to find unprivileged_userns profile" (among other things). And it's been reproduced by another as the following relates. Can

[Bug 2064139] Re: not building for arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x

2024-04-29 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
This is expected since the library package is arch:all and is not built in non-amd64 arches. The runc binary package was moved to src:runc-app. Therefore, no binary package is built in non-amd64 architectures by src:runc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 2063973] Re: network-online.target is reached before netplan-configured interfaces are online

2024-04-28 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
I think I understood this. I have a udev rule to force the NIC name to eno1, which is not the driver's default (it is eno1np0). I did not regenerate the initramfs, so that rule did not propagate there. What happens is: - initramfs is executed. The NIC is renamed to eno1np0 (driver's default). -

[Bug 2063973] Re: network-online.target is reached before netplan-configured interfaces are online

2024-04-27 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
It worked fine in Ubuntu 23.10: network-online.target is only reached after eno1 is configured. # journalctl -b |grep -e network -e grid5000.mount Apr 28 00:23:06 localhost kernel: drop_monitor: Initializing network drop monitor service Apr 28 00:23:06 localhost systemd[1]: Listening on

[Bug 2063973] [NEW] network-online.target is reached before netplan-configured interfaces are online

2024-04-27 Thread Lucas Nussbaum
Public bug reported: Hi, Running Ubuntu 24.04 with netplan.io/netplan-generator 1.0-2ubuntu1. I use a systemd unit to mount an NFS filesystem. That unit should only be activated when the network is ready. However, it looks like network- online.target is reached before netplan-configured

[Bug 2058622] Re: [needs-packaging] lenovo-wwan-unlock

2024-04-25 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Hi Dirk Su, I cloned the git repo and for instance the debian/changelog is confusing, there are many entries which makes me think that this package is already maintained somewhere else, is this maintained in a PPA and now you are trying to put it in the Ubuntu archive? When the package is landing

[Bug 2036761] Re: [mantic] ppa-purge no longer purges what add-apt-repository adds

2024-04-25 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Apparently, there is nothing to be sponsored here, I am unsubscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors. If I misunderstood the status of this bug and there is something ready to be sponsored, please subscribe ~ubuntu-sponsors again. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 2054395] Re: [sru] sos upstream 4.7.0

2024-04-25 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
@Arif are the attached debdiffs ready to be uploaded? I do not know if I get it right, but the bug you mentioned is not yet fixed: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sosreport/+bug/2038648 If this is ready for ~ubuntu-sponsors, please state so. If not, please unsubscribe ~ubuntu-sponsors

[Bug 2054391] Re: Fix CPU thermal sensors enumeration

2024-04-25 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks for the patch @Kai-Heng! I took a look and in general it looks good, but I'd like to ask you to add some DEP-3 headers [1] to your patch, that will give us (packagers) more context when revisiting this package for whatever reason. Now a personal opinion, I like when the patch file name is

[Bug 2036467] Re: Resizing cloud-images occasionally fails due to superblock checksum mismatch in resize2fs

2024-04-25 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
@Matthew I took a look at your debdiffs (I hope they are updated) and they look good in general, I checked the debdiffs for Focal, Jammy, Mantic and Noble. The Noble debdiff requires a rebase, now in Noble we have version 1.47.0-2.4~exp1ubuntu4, so we want version 1.47.0-2.4~exp1ubuntu4.1 with

[Bug 2063099] Re: Stopping container signal blocked by AppArmor on Ubuntu

2024-04-25 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks for providing the workaround Tomáš! I can confirm that it works in Noble, but for me, even using the profile you provided in comment #4, the command below takes more or less 10 seconds (against 12 seconds when the containers are killed with SIGKILL): root@docker-apparmor:~# time docker

[Bug 2051380] Re: Expired certificate used for tests causes failures

2024-04-25 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
FWIW there is no autopkgtest regression now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051380 Title: Expired certificate used for tests causes failures To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 2049197] Re: ruby_xfree segmentation fault

2024-04-25 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
FWIW there is no autopkgtest regression now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049197 Title: ruby_xfree segmentation fault To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 2051380] Re: Expired certificate used for tests causes failures

2024-04-24 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
The packages built fine in all supported architectures, satisfying the Test Plan section. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-mantic ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy verification-done-mantic -- You received this bug

[Bug 2049197] Re: ruby_xfree segmentation fault

2024-04-24 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
# Verification Mantic root@ruby31-segfault-fix:~# dpkg -l ruby3.1 Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Architecture

[Bug 2060566] Re: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty

2024-04-23 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Even though the verification is already done, we intend to only release this package on April 30 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060566 Title: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty

[Bug 2060566] Re: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty

2024-04-23 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
I have performed the verification for this proposed changed. Attached to this comment, are the test results we have obtained when running a custom script that: 1) Launches a trusty lxd container 2) Install the proposed version of the Pro client 3) Checks that esm-infra-legacy appears on ua

[Bug 2061745] Re: Please demote golang-1.21 to universe

2024-04-17 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
I uploaded the container stack packages to Noble to make them build with Go 1.22, those are the versions that require approval: - runc-app/1.1.12-0ubuntu3 - container-app/1.7.12-0ubuntu4 - docker.io-app/24.0.7-0ubuntu4 - docker-buildx/0.12.1-0ubuntu2 - docker-compose-v2/2.24.6+ds1-0ubuntu2 I

[Bug 2061745] Re: Please demote golang-1.21 to universe

2024-04-17 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
All the container stack packages are using golang-1.21 because it is available in all supported releases (we want to keep the same behavior everywhere). Unfortunately, golang-1.22 is only in Noble. We could move to golang-1.22 in Noble if Foundations backport golang-1.22 to the other releases

[Bug 2061667] Re: Noble 'autofs' 5.1.9-1ubuntu3 buffer overflow

2024-04-16 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and trying to make Ubuntu better. Could you please share your config files so we can try to reproduce the bug locally? ** Changed in: autofs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 2059883] Re: package unixodbc-common 2.3.9-5 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/etc/odbc.ini', which is also in package odbcinst 2.3.11-1

2024-04-16 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and trying to make Ubuntu better. As Hugh already mentioned, it seems that you are installing packages not from the Ubuntu archive and that is not supported. This part of the log makes me believe on that: modified.conffile..etc.odbc.ini: [ODBC

[Bug 2060967] [NEW] noble/rsync buffer overflow detected

2024-04-11 Thread Sascha Lucas
Public bug reported: Hi, running the following test case in a current (today/2024-04-11) Noble install leads to a "buffer overflow detected": $ rsync -F --delete-after --archive /etc/fstab 127.0.0.1:/tmp/ *** buffer overflow detected ***: terminated rsync: connection unexpectedly closed (11

[Bug 2031192] Re: Enabling of Pro Services Does Not Update when using airgapped mirrors over http://

2024-04-10 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + When users create an airgapped environement, they may create APT mirrors + for the ESM services that share a common base URL. For example, in this + bug here, the user was mirroring their services one: + +

[Bug 2033313] Re: Rename ua_logs.tar.gz to up_logs.tar.gz

2024-04-10 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Description changed: + [ Impact ] + + Since we want users to relate to the Pro name when using the client, + renaming the collect_logs output from ua_logs to pro_logs is a step on + that direction. + + [ Test Plan ] + + This is already covered by the integration tests tied to the next Pro

[Bug 2060732] [NEW] [SRU] ubuntu-advantage-tools (31 -> 32) Xenial, Bionic, Focal, Jammy, Mantic

2024-04-09 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Public bug reported: [ Impact ] This release brings both bug-fixes and new features for the Pro Client, and we would like to make sure all of our supported customers have access to these improvements on all releases. The most important changes are: - d/apparmor:introduce new

[Bug 2060566] Re: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty

2024-04-08 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Description changed: [Impact] As Trusty is reaching EOL of ESM support, we are now creating a new service called esm-infra-legacy to extend ESM support for more time. - Users who are entitled to that service, will need to run both of these - commands to enable the service in their

[Bug 2060566] Re: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty

2024-04-08 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Also affects: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060566 Title: Add esm-infra-legacy support for

[Bug 2060566] Re: Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty

2024-04-08 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Description changed: - As Trusty is reaching EOL of ESM support, we are now creating a new - service called esm-infra-legacy to extend that support for more time + [Impact] + As Trusty is reaching EOL of ESM support, we are now creating a new service called esm-infra-legacy to extend ESM

[Bug 2060566] [NEW] Add esm-infra-legacy support for Trusty

2024-04-08 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Public bug reported: As Trusty is reaching EOL of ESM support, we are now creating a new service called esm-infra-legacy to extend that support for more time ** Affects: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification

[Bug 1052030] Re: Please transition libgnomeprint to multi-arch

2024-04-06 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
I am not sure why ~ubuntu-sponsors is subscribed to this bug. Is someone actively working on this? Is this still an issue nowadays? For now, I am unsubscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2059182] Re: autopkgtests fail for dune-grid/2.9.0-2build1

2024-04-06 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
As you can see here: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dune-uggrid The version 2.9.0-2build2 was already uploaded with a no changes rebuild: dune-uggrid (2.9.0-2build2) noble; urgency=medium * No-change rebuild for CVE-2024-3094 -- Steve Langasek Sun, 31 Mar 2024 18:05:33 + This

[Bug 2058692] Re: black autopkgtest fails because python3-typed-ast no longer in archive

2024-04-06 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Unsubscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058692 Title: black autopkgtest fails because python3-typed-ast no longer in archive To manage notifications about

[Bug 2059291] Re: autopkgtest failure against libphonenumber/8.12.57+ds-4.2build1

2024-04-05 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks Chris! I added just a reference to this bug in the changelog, with that this bug will be closed once the package migrates. Keep an eye on that next time. Package uploaded: Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com): Uploading pnc_0.9.4-3build3.dsc: done. Uploading

[Bug 2058606] Re: Sync rocm-hipamd 5.7.1-3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)

2024-04-05 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Right now, version 5.7.1-3 fails to build in Noble because of some uninstallability issues: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libobjc-13-dev : Depends: gcc-13-base (= 13.2.0-13ubuntu1) but 13.2.0-17ubuntu2 is to be installed Depends: libgcc-13-dev (=

[Bug 2058958] Re: armhf autopkgtest failure (due to time_t format args)

2024-04-05 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
I was able to build it now. Package uploaded: Uploading to ubuntu (via ftp to upload.ubuntu.com): Uploading gvmd_23.1.0-1ubuntu3.dsc: done. Uploading gvmd_23.1.0-1ubuntu3.debian.tar.xz: done. Uploading gvmd_23.1.0-1ubuntu3_source.changes: done. Successfully uploaded packages. -- You

[Bug 2058622] Re: [needs-packaging] lenovo-wwan-unlock

2024-04-05 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Hi Dirk Su, If I understood correctly, what you want here is someone to sponsor the upload of lenovo-wwan-unlock, and this is the git repo with the source package: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lenovo-wwan-unlock Did I get it right? You added the MIR bug description template here and it

[Bug 2058192] Re: [MIR][needs-packaging] lenovo-wwan-unlock

2024-04-05 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
I am unsubscribing ~ubuntu-sponsors for now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058192 Title: [MIR][needs-packaging] lenovo-wwan-unlock To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 2058917] Re: cvise 2.10.0-1 still depends on python-pytest-flake8 although upstream dropped it

2024-04-04 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
The changes look good to me. However, when trying to build it in Noble it fails at the moment (because of the ongoing transitions). If I build it with noble-updates I get the following unmet dependencies: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libobjc-13-dev : Depends: gcc-13-base (=

[Bug 2058958] Re: armhf autopkgtest failure (due to time_t format args)

2024-04-04 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
The patch looks good, but I cannot build the package locally due to some uninstallability issues with gcc-13 at the moment in Noble: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libobjc-13-dev : Depends: gcc-13-base (= 13.2.0-13ubuntu1) but 13.2.0-17ubuntu2 is to be installed

[Bug 2060072] [NEW] Removal request to allow ruby-faraday 2.x migration

2024-04-02 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Public bug reported: ruby-faraday-middleware was marked as deprecated by ruby-faraday 2.x: https://github.com/lostisland/faraday_middleware?tab=readme-ov- file#faraday-middleware As expected, the tests do not work with the new version. We need to follow Debian and request its removal:

[Bug 2060069] [NEW] Removal request to allow ruby-faraday 2.x migration

2024-04-02 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Public bug reported: ruby-behance/0.6.1-4 does not support ruby-faraday 2.x and last upstream commit in the Github repo was from 6 years ago: https://github.com/amedrz/behance Apparently, there will not be any further developement. In Debian, the Ruby team is planning to remove it from the

[Bug 2059952] Re: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service

2024-04-02 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Description changed: [ Impact ] Currently, the Pro client support a daemon named ubuntu-advantage.service that performs two actions: * Actively look for Pro licenses on Azure and GCP images to perform an auto-attach * Retry auto-attach on Pro images if that command fails on boot

[Bug 2059952] Re: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service

2024-04-02 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Description changed: [ Impact ] Currently, the Pro client support a daemon named ubuntu-advantage.service that performs two actions: * Actively look for Pro licenses on Azure and GCP images to perform an auto-attach * Retry auto-attach on Pro images if that command fails on boot

[Bug 2059952] Re: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service

2024-04-02 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Description changed: [ Impact ] - If the user has specified custom setup for the Pro client through cloud-init, there is a high chance that this setup will be ignored. + Currently, the Pro client support a daemon named ubuntu-advantage.service that + performs two actions: - This happened

[Bug 2059952] Re: pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service

2024-04-02 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
** Description changed: - We have recently updated the Pro to not strictly run after cloud- - config.service. If cloud-config.service has not been started when pro - runs, it can complete before cloud-config.service begins and thus the - user-specificed pro configuration will be ignored since the

[Bug 2059975] [NEW] Remove from Noble

2024-04-01 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Public bug reported: ruby-defaults/1:3.2~ubuntu1 is now in the release pocket (the default is ruby3.2) and ruby3.1 (source and binaries) should be removed from Noble. There is no package depending on it in Noble at the moment: $ reverse-depends -r noble src:ruby3.1 $ reverse-depends -r noble

[Bug 2059952] [NEW] pro sometimes runs before cloud-config.service

2024-04-01 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Public bug reported: We have recently updated the Pro to not strictly run after cloud- config.service. If cloud-config.service has not been started when pro runs, it can complete before cloud-config.service begins and thus the user-specificed pro configuration will be ignored since the instance

[Bug 2059306] Re: [Feature Request] Inform user of Ubuntu Pro network requirements

2024-04-01 Thread Lucas Albuquerque Medeiros de Moura
Hi Brandon Castillo, I think that is a good idea and I agree that we can make this error message better. ** Changed in: ubuntu-advantage-tools (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2058942] Re: package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.36-0ubuntu0.23.10.1 failed to install/upgrade: subproces van pakket mysql-server-8.0 werd script post-installation geïnstalleerd gaf de foutwaarde 1 teru

2024-03-28 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and trying to make Ubuntu better. Checking the logs, this is the problem you faced: mysqld: Error on realpath() on '"/var/lib/mysql-files/";' (Error 2 - No such file or directory) Could you confirm that the /var/lib/mysql-files does not exist? Did

[Bug 2051380] Re: Expired certificate used for tests causes failures

2024-03-21 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + This is causing a FTBFS, so rubyx.y cannot be rebuilt. + + [Test Plan] + + Build the package in the targeted releases. No test failure is expected. + + [Where Problems could occur] + + The test certificates were renewed, to be honest I fail to foresee

[Bug 2049197] Re: ruby_xfree segmentation fault

2024-03-21 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + Users might face a segfault when using ruby_free. + + [Test Plan] + + # apt update && apt install -y ruby ruby-nokogiri + # cat > reproducer.rb <=22.04 that causes segfault relatively rarely. Even though rare with repetitions running small wrappers it

[Bug 2052313] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 still using Ruby 3.1 close to EOL

2024-03-20 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
No. Ruby 3.2 will be supported by Canonical during lifetime of Noble. We do not change default interpreters in stable releases. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2052313 Title: Ubuntu

[Bug 2051380] Re: Expired certificate used for tests causes failures

2024-03-20 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) ** Changed in: ruby3.1 (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: ruby3.1 (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ruby3.1 (Ubuntu Mantic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (luc

[Bug 2052313] Re: Ubuntu 24.04 still using Ruby 3.1 close to EOL

2024-03-20 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Noble will be released with Ruby 3.2 as the default. Right now, many transitions are ongoing and because of that the ruby one is not complete yet. But do not worry, users will have Ruby 3.2 in Noble. ** Changed in: ruby3.1 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: ruby-defaults

[Bug 2049197] Re: ruby_xfree segmentation fault

2024-03-20 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
This is fixed in ruby3.2/3.2.3-1build2 in Noble. ** Changed in: ruby3.2 (Ubuntu Noble) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2049197 Title:

[Bug 2049197] Re: ruby_xfree segmentation fault

2024-03-19 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Ubuntu Noble) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: ruby3.1 (Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: ruby3.0 (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) ** Changed in: ruby3.1 (Ubuntu Mantic) Assignee: (unassigned

[Bug 2035331] Re: Upgrading to version 2.9.1.1

2024-03-14 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~calvinmwadime/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+git/walinuxagent/+merge/461115 ** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~calvinmwadime/ubuntu/+source/walinuxagent/+git/walinuxagent/+merge/461117 ** Merge proposal linked:

[Bug 2040460] Re: MRE updates of container-stack for noble

2024-03-13 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
I am uploading src:runc to the SRU queue but it should land once the src:runc-app is accepted from NEW (in all supported releases). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040460 Title: MRE

[Bug 2022390] Re: Keep the -dev binary package in sync with Debian

2024-03-12 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
c) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Mantic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: runc (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanas

[Bug 2040460] Re: MRE updates of container-stack for noble

2024-03-12 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Description changed: - Backport container-stack as MRE to noble once the update for noble has - been completed. + [Impact] - + In order to follow our policy on keeping the container stack (docker.io- + app, containerd-app, runc, runc-app, docker-buildx, and docker- + compose-v2) up-to-date

[Bug 2040460] Re: MRE updates of container-stack for noble

2024-03-12 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Ubuntu Mantic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: docker-buildx (Ubuntu Jammy) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: docker-buildx (Ubuntu Mantic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) ** Changed in: docker-buildx (Ubuntu Jammy) Assignee: (u

[Bug 2056760] Re: [snap]Thunderbird doesn't authenticate with sssd-kcm

2024-03-12 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Hi Helga, Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and trying to make Ubuntu better. From what I understood this is an issue with the snap package of Thunderbird, if that's the case you should try to report here (?): https://snapcraft.io/thunderbird I am not sure if this bug will reach

[Bug 2056372] Re: Enabling SPF checks with CHECK_RCPT_SPF doesn't work

2024-03-12 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Could you provide your config file? Also state if you applied any customization in your set up? Those things would be useful to reproduce what you described locally. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 2056443] Re: CHECK_RCPT_SPF SPF check fails if inbound IP address is IPv6

2024-03-12 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Shouldn't this be marked as duplicate then? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2056443 Title: CHECK_RCPT_SPF SPF check fails if inbound IP address is IPv6 To manage notifications about

[Bug 2056154] Re: Please build with golang-1.21 or golang-1.22

2024-03-12 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
I am working on it. ** Changed in: containerd-app (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) ** Changed in: docker.io-app (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) ** Changed in: containerd-app (Ubuntu) Statu

[Bug 2056317] [NEW] package nvidia-driver-390 390.157-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 failed to install/upgrade: problemas de dependência - deixando desconfigurado

2024-03-06 Thread Lucas Bonald
Public bug reported: I can not install the gpu driver without an error. ProblemType: Package DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: nvidia-driver-390 390.157-0ubuntu0.22.04.2 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-21.21~22.04.1-generic 6.5.8 Uname: Linux 6.5.0-21-generic x86_64 ApportVersion:

[Bug 2055344] [NEW] Do not support ruby-rmagick 5.3.0

2024-02-28 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Public bug reported: ruby-gruff/0.6.0-2 do not support ruby-rmagick/5.3.0-2build2 and this is blocking the ruby-defaults migration. There is a new upstream release of ruby-gruff (a.k.a. version 0.23.0) which seems to support this newer version of ruby-rmagick, however, it requires some new

[Bug 2040410] Re: Merge pcs from Debian unstable for noble

2024-02-27 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
** Changed in: pcs (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: pcs (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040410 Title:

[Bug 2055221] [NEW] Do not support ruby 3.2

2024-02-27 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Public bug reported: ruby-rgfa/1.3.1+dfsg-2 does not support ruby 3.2. Many core feature of this gem rely on methods that were removed from ruby 3.2. I do not expect any fix from upstream, since the last commit is from 8 years ago: https://github.com/ggonnella/rgfa FWIW this is the autopkgtest

[Bug 2055217] [NEW] Do not support ruby 3.2

2024-02-27 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Public bug reported: diaspora-installer/0.7.18.2+debian4 do not support ruby 3.2. Initially we have an issue with the configurate gem native extension build, which can be seen in the autopkgtest log:

[Bug 720638] Re: snmpd crashes with segfault (libnetsnmpmibs.so.15.1.2)

2024-02-16 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Hi, Could you please share the core dump with us? That would help us investigate better this issue. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/720638 Title: snmpd crashes with segfault

[Bug 1968922] Re: libnss3 is affected by CVE-2022-22747

2022-06-21 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
Hi Luís, This CVE is indeed not fixed yet in none of the Ubuntu releases: https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-22747 As you can see on the top of the page the priority was marked as Low, so I think the Security team is not considering this too important. Maybe someone from the Security team

[Bug 1975768] Re: Backport container-stack as MRE for bionic, focal, impish, jammy (May)

2022-06-06 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1960449 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960449 The backport of the following packages were done in Jammy, Impish and Focal: - runc version 1.1.0 - containerd version 1.5.9 - docker.io version 20.10.12 This is not fully complete (missing Bionic)

[Bug 1975769] Re: Backport container-stack as MRE for bionic, focal, jammy (September)

2022-06-06 Thread Lucas Kanashiro
) ** Changed in: containerd (Ubuntu) Milestone: ubuntu-22.08 => ubuntu-22.09 ** Changed in: containerd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Lucas Kanashiro (lucaskanashiro) ** Changed in: docker.io (Ubuntu) Milestone: ubuntu-22.08 => ubuntu-22.09 ** Changed in: docker.io (Ubuntu)

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >