Public bug reported:
https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Btrfs_source_repositories
Support for mixed data/metadata is only in the integration branch and
not the 2 year old stable branch.
$ git clone http://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git
$ cd btrfs-progs-unstable
$ git bran
I tried getting more data after getting home. Killing network manager's
applet and then reloading it from a console to capture the error stream.
(nm-applet:13297): libnotify-WARNING **: Failed to connect to proxy
** (nm-applet:13297): DEBUG: old state indicates that this was not a disconnect 0
**
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu oneiric (development branch)
11.10 (updated about 20 min ago via hardline (which thankfully auto-configures
for me))
network-manager 0.8.9997+git.20110721t045648.36db194...
network-manager-gnome 0.8.9997+git.20110726t113022.cc3d423
nm-applet blongs to network-manager
Me too in 11.10; apport also didn't want to authenticate me and I had to
manually sudo to run it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810335
Title:
NetworkManager crashed with SIGABRT in _
Public bug reported:
My Eee901 has a 4 Billion Byte SSD and an 8 Billion Byte ssd. Selecting
btrfs however results in out of space errors even before the initial
stage of the install is complete due to exhaustion of nodes with the
default FS values designed for larger devices.
** Affects: debian
I downloaded and installed grub-pc_1.99~20101126-1ubuntu3_amd64.deb
03-Dec-2010 06:05 872K (along with grub-common same version) and
the problem is fixed in that version.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bu
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/526912
Title:
nouveau framebuffer crashed : [TTM] DRM memory manager type 2 is not clea
Do I need to file a regression against 1.98-1ubuntu9 for Lucid 10.04
LTS? These precise symptoms are occurring again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580408
Title:
Option 'No' at ques
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: egroupware
I know it's already in these two bugs, but waiting for upstream changes
is not necessary since two very simple workarounds that could be back-
ported to many older versions exist.
>From bugs:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/egroupwar
Better fix:
sudo editor /etc/apache2/conf.d/egroupware
Change this line to add /usr/share/doc (permissive; or have the packages
it's split across added)
php_admin_value open_basedir
/usr/share/egroupware:/var/lib/egroupware:/tmp:/usr/share/php:/usr/share/doc
NOTE: You should also add whatever
You no longer have to do this site-wide:
sudo editor /etc/apache2/conf.d/egroupware
php_admin_value request_order GPCS
Why isn't this set by default?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
This is fairly easy to repeat.
Suspend laptop.
(My battery happened to reach 100% recharge during suspend; relation
undetermined)
Resume laptop.
[13429.220048] wlan0: no IPv6 routers present
[13441.203970] Corrupted low memory at 88001580 (1580 phys) =
1a8635f004700
[13441.203980] Corru
I'm a bit perplexed by this:
Corrupted low memory at 88001580 (1580 phys) = 1a8635f004700
Corrupted low memory at 88001588 (1588 phys) = f700
Corrupted low memory at 88001590 (1590 phys) = 1bfff9442e5b
Corrupted low memory at 88001598 (1598 phys) = 1
Are you getting this error only after the computer was put to sleep (in
to a suspend or hibernation state)? If yes, please mark as duplicate of
bug 543672.
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/arch/x86/kernel/check.c:134
check_for_bios_corruption+0xcb/0xe0()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Are you getting this error only after the computer was put to sleep (in
to a suspend or hibernation state)? If yes, please mark as duplicate of
bug 543672.
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/arch/x86/kernel/check.c:134
check_for_bios_corruption+0xe5/0x100()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 543672 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543672
I disagree that this is a duplicate of bug 418417; I think they could be
fixed by the same solution, but one is for Karmic and the other Lucid.
So instead I'll collect it in to bug 543672.
** This bug has bee
This might be related to bug 543672. Does it happen _every_ time you
boot, or just when you're coming out of suspend or hibernation?
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/arch/x86/kernel/check.c:134
check_for_bios_corruption+0xcb/0xe0()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533181
You received th
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 543672 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543672
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 543672
metabug lucid check_for_bios_corruption on suspend/resume
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/arch/x86/kernel/check.c:134
check_for_bios_corrup
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 543672 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/543672
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 543672
metabug lucid check_for_bios_corruption on suspend/resume
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/arch/x86/kernel/check.c:134
check_for_bios_corrup
Does this happen at 'cold' boot, or only when resuming from a suspend or
hibernation? If the later is the case, please mark as duplicate of bug
543672. (unless another reply says otherwise)
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.32/arch/x86/kernel/check.c:134
check_for_bios_corruption 0xe5/0x10
** Attachment added: "AlsaDevices.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545640/AlsaDevices.txt
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545641/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "Card0.Amixer.values.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41545642/Card0.Amixer.valu
Public bug reported:
Apport is reporting horridly generic descriptions for this bug;
absolutely useless. I'm going to create a bug with metabug in the
subject and see if I can consolidate things that fit this pattern
against a single bug.
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/arch/x86/kernel/ch
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41454575/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "InitctlList.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41454576/InitctlList.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcAttrCurrent.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41454577/ProcAttrCurrent.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-settings-daemon
This seems to be a meta-glitch relating to an update that I applied last
night.
Logging in after booting this morning showed the custom background
image, but none of the (autohide) taskbars appeared nor did alt+f2 work.
Switching t
This, BTW, was at one point working in Karmic, but recently broke (I
don't remember exactly what updates that occurred with) and also showed
up when I re-installed with just Lucid since it had otherwise become
stable enough for near normal use (and more in depth testing).
--
System frezes after f
I too am experiencing issues with multiple luks partitions. Under a
single LVM I have three crypt-volumes. One for /, /home, and swap. All
require passwords.
I have read the man page for crypttab and my entries are NOT using
noearly; therefore all three partitions should be prompted for and ask
Maybe it's like bug 418417 but from another angle?
--
sleep,hibernation fail
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/535553
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.u
I think this bug effects me too; and is matched to the sometimes
detected kernel-error. However I only discovered it when I realized I
was selecting Sleep and wondered where Suspend and Hibernate options
were tossed; leading to a google search.
--
sleep,hibernation fail
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Agreed, this effects me as well in a similar way.
Still present in current 10.04 kernel: 2.6.32-16-generic
--
WARNING: at /build/buildd/linux-2.6.31/arch/x86/kernel/check.c:134
check_for_bios_corruption+0xe5/0x100()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/418417
You received this bug notification becau
Almost inexplicably after leaving the laptop turned off over-night and
turning it back on (without first booting any other install on it) the
system loaded without further issue. I have no idea if it is a race
condition or some other cause.
I'll keep updating and testing as normal. If I am unabl
** Attachment added: "dmesg of event"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39698456/dmesg
--
nouveau framebuffer crashed : [TTM] DRM memory manager type 2 is not clean.
kernel BUG at
/build/buildd/linux-backports-modules-2.6.32-2.6.32/debian/build/build-generic/nouveau/ttm/ttm_bo.c:1475!
https://b
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39698486/Xorg.0.log
--
nouveau framebuffer crashed : [TTM] DRM memory manager type 2 is not clean.
kernel BUG at
/build/buildd/linux-backports-modules-2.6.32-2.6.32/debian/build/build-generic/nouveau/ttm/ttm_bo.c:1475!
https://
Public bug reported:
The 20100224 daily alternate installs and boots successfully to X.
Install SSH server before rebooting.
After applying the latest updates to the system/X upon reboot the
laptop's screen is back-light off and the system non-navigable.
ps axf
PID TTY STAT TIME COMMAN
** Changed in: linux-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
black-screen framebuffer console: [lbm-drm] nouveau :02:00.0: No ctxprog
for NV86
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525207
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Still doesn't work with 20100224.
--
Regression (from 9.10) LVM /boot MBR install /usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: no
mapping exists for `lin-boot' - Lucid (10.04) netinstall (20100220)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525085
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I noticed this regression after re-installing 9.10 and performing normal
system updates. I was backing out of a full Lucid install to dual 9.10
/ lucid installs.
I can enter the passwords for / and swap correctly within the initrd.
Then fsck is run on /boot (/dev/sda3) and / (lvm).
Next a secon
** Attachment added: "Dmesg booting an install from daily alternate 20100222"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39521936/dmesg
--
daily 20100222 (+?) nouveau framebuffer works for X, unable to switch back to
normal virtual consoles
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525664
You received this bug not
Public bug reported:
Install as normal on a system that will default to nouveau framebuffer.
X loads
Switch to a virtual console (ctrl+alt+f1)
Observed behavior: Static image of last X information.
Expected behavior: Video-reset to standard bios console (old behavior) OR to
framebuffer console (
A different bug was my root cause. Though the bugs both involve lack of
working framebuffer leading to an unusable, non-trivial to test/repair,
system.
--
Intel 915GM/GMS/910GML: blank screen after booting 2.6.32
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515246
You received this bug notification because
It seems that the fix for this made it in to the Daily alternate CD for
20100222. I've installed it and the system allows me to unlock the
single test partition I now have setup on my dual-ubuntu-boot laptop
before flickering briefly and entering X.
However I am then unable to access any other co
Daily build 20100222 fixes my framebuffer issues and this bug no longer
effects me. However depending on a framebuffer as a core system
component somehow seems like the wrong route to take.
--
[lucid] Plymouth hangs at boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/518034
You received this bug notificatio
** Attachment added: "One attempt that I noticed had interesting messages
after..."
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39469384/ubuntu-forced-flashdrive-boot.txt
--
black-screen framebuffer console: [lbm-drm] nouveau :02:00.0: No ctxprog
for NV86
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525207
You re
Public bug reported:
My symptoms are an utter inability to have a working framebuffer console
which creates a cascade of failure ending with what I learned was called
plymouth freezing with a solid white bar of characters when I
blacklisted all framebuffer/nvidia/nouveau related modules in chroot
I think I might have the same issue on an Nvidia 8xxx based laptop;
unfortunately I can't see anything past boot and am not sure if
netconsole is built in to the kernel (which is how I debug things on
kernels I compile for other distros).
--
Intel 915GM/GMS/910GML: blank screen after booting 2.6
Confirmed fixed when using net-install to download. Now I'm running in
to other bugs... Thank you for the quick resolution.
It seems like this is something an automated test should catch and hold
production of the daily images over.
--
Lucid (10.04) daily 20100220 linux-backports-modules-nouve
** Attachment added: "syslog"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39459554/syslog
--
Regression (from 9.10) LVM /boot MBR install /usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: no
mapping exists for `lin-boot' - Lucid (10.04) netinstall (20100220)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525085
You received this bug notific
** Attachment added: "partman"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39459548/partman
--
Regression (from 9.10) LVM /boot MBR install /usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: no
mapping exists for `lin-boot' - Lucid (10.04) netinstall (20100220)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525085
You received this bug notif
** Attachment added: "hardware"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39459532/hardware-summary
--
Regression (from 9.10) LVM /boot MBR install /usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: no
mapping exists for `lin-boot' - Lucid (10.04) netinstall (20100220)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525085
You received this
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: grub-installer
Feb 20 23:10:47 grub-installer: info: Installing grub on '/dev/sda'
Feb 20 23:10:47 grub-installer: info: Running chroot /target grub-install
--no-floppy --force "/dev/sda"
Feb 20 23:10:49 grub-installer: /usr/sbin/grub-probe: error: no m
Confirmed also fails in a VM as well as when using a net-install from a
USB drive.
--
Lucid (10.04) daily 20100220 linux-backports-modules-nouveau-lucid-generic:
Depends: linux-backports-modules-nouveau-2.6.32-14-generic but it is not
installable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524811
You recei
** Attachment added: "media info: Ubuntu 10.04 "Lucid Lynx" - Alpha amd64
(20100220)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39442449/media-info
--
Lucid (10.04) daily 20100220 linux-backports-modules-nouveau-lucid-generic:
Depends: linux-backports-modules-nouveau-2.6.32-14-generic but it is not
in
** Attachment added: "hardware"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39442441/hardware-summary
--
Lucid (10.04) daily 20100220 linux-backports-modules-nouveau-lucid-generic:
Depends: linux-backports-modules-nouveau-2.6.32-14-generic but it is not
installable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524811
** Attachment added: "Sorry, THIS is syslog"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39442435/syslog
--
Lucid (10.04) daily 20100220 linux-backports-modules-nouveau-lucid-generic:
Depends: linux-backports-modules-nouveau-2.6.32-14-generic but it is not
installable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/5248
** Attachment added: "syslog"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39442430/partman
--
Lucid (10.04) daily 20100220 linux-backports-modules-nouveau-lucid-generic:
Depends: linux-backports-modules-nouveau-2.6.32-14-generic but it is not
installable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/524811
You receive
Public bug reported:
Feb 20 08:55:58 in-target: Some packages could not be installed. This may mean
that you have
Feb 20 08:55:58 in-target: requested an impossible situation or if you are
using the unstable
Feb 20 08:55:58 in-target: distribution that some required packages have not
yet been c
The problem with a normal table is you get a result like this:
# | Really Long Description | Another big description | A third description
|
User 1 |
User 2 |
User 3 |
I won't bother adding the spaces since the display will strip them out,
but I think you can figure out how that grid wastes
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-system-tools
This is a wishlist priority item, please change that as I don't have
that kind of access.
I think it would be much easier to understand and control current
account privileges if there were a tabular format.
Across the top slanted ( li
Also, I just noticed when going to file the other wishlist bug... Why
was my bug linked to GDM as a duplicate? I specifically chose the
proper package and hadn't looked; this isn't related to mine at all!
--
Update PAM policy to allow password-less logins set up via users-admin
https://bugs.lau
Sorry, I was trying to clarify potential use cases, both for passwords
with and passwords without sys-admin capabilities. Editing accounts is
probably some other bug... all the usability issues that I see as
related actually collections of different bugs. Each bug a small piece
of grit fouling th
If that is the case then the root user should be added to the admin
group by default.
** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
System administration task dialgues do not allow the account 'root' to
authenticate even with a password
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
My use case is different. My parents are near retirement and just want
a super-easy-to-use computer; that means security via physical access
only. Accounts are merely a preference filing system to them.
Password-less accounts in the admin group are a questionable thing; but
if that's what the sy
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-system-tools
Tested on 9.10 beta and 9.04 as well.
Steps to reproduce:
#Set a root password.
sudo passwd
# Verify you can login at a local console.
(ctrl+alt+f1) login...
Logout/switch back to your X session.
Attempt to launch a graphical system
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 393854 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393854
While I agree that the correct policy would be to (after a clear
warning) allow password-less accounts...
'Documentation' in this case should be a CLEAR error message triggered
by this combination of events:
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 393854 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393854
Having this behavior isn't in it's self a bug. Not /documenting/ the
behavior properly in dialogs related to system administration tools /is/
a bug. Additionally when root ==HAS A PASSWORD== it is a valid ac
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 393854 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393854
I should clarify, this is an issue I encountered trying to unlock the
privileged mode of system administration tasks. As an example,
adding/modifying users/groups with the tool found in the system menu.
It sh
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 393854 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/393854
The user logged in at the time was NOT root. As I described, I had
created a root password (I like su better than sudo -s, and local root
login is nicer for servicing a system than the potential alternative
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-system-tools
Unable to authenticate as user 'root' (I have added a password) OR as
current user (account has no password due to end user preference).
The end users in question want one click logins and to not remember
passwords. They might be conv
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33849674/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33849675/ProcMaps.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33849676/ProcStatus.txt
--
Unable
Please set importance to Wishlist (I don't seem to be able to make that
change)
--
Migration Assistant should be usable outside the installer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453586
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubun
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: migration-assistant
Migration-assistant should allow the following:
0) Operation Before, During, and After install.
1) Create new accounts
2) As mentioned in some ubuntu task documents, allow for backup/archiving
accounts to other media in the case of a
** Attachment added: "Install Log from ubuntu 9.10 beta"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33804152/install-logs.tar.gz
--
Copies all accounts in to the single-initial account instead of copying
accounts to -new- accounts of the same name.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/453570
You received this
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: migration-assistant
This is the actual real-world use case:
While trying to pitch Linux (Mint) to older users (50/60s) as a
replacement for an aging WinXP installation migration-assistant fails to
copy and create the selected accounts from the Windows XP
"If you upgrade the version of webkit on the CD, or download today's
daily-live CD (http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/), does the bug
still happen?"
Thank you, I didn't know about -that- set of daily builds and the
2009-10-16 build has proceeded past the section where the 9.10-Beta-x86
CD faile
It would be very nice to attach multiple attachments in one post... or
more than one with the first.
** Attachment added: "ubiquity-debug.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33770607/ubiquity-debug.gz
--
Ubiquity fails after the summary, dies while trying to show the partition editor
https://bu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
Ubuntu 9.10 Beta cd, ubituity as included and updated via apt-get update
; apt-get install ubiquity (to 2.0.0)
apt-cache policy ubiquity
ubiquity:
Installed: 2.0.0
Candidate: 2.0.0
Version table:
*** 2.0.0 0
500 http://archive.ubu
** Attachment added: "syslog.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33770524/syslog.gz
--
Ubiquity fails after the summary, dies while trying to show the partition editor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/452796
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
** Attachment added: "partman.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33770448/partman.gz
** Attachment added: "Casper.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33770449/Casper.gz
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33770450/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Ub
I confirm that this patch works for me, though it does ask me to decrypt
my root partition prior to resuming from swap (which is an un-necessary
entry of a password, unless it's checking the disk for resume
entries/info first; though it mounts / after it checks resume so I doubt
that is the case).
-Fully- updated xubuntu jaunty (9.04) install (amd64, 2gb ram, Turion64
(AMD dual core)).
KGpg
Version 2.1.0
Using KDE 4.2.2 (KDE 4.2.2)
gpg (GnuPG) 1.4.9
While refreshing a selection of keys from the keyserver (after it
updates the keyring successfully)
Application: KGpg (kgpg), signal SIGSEGV
The upstream bug is unconfirmed, while I can confirm that it does affect
me as well. Unfortunately it looks, from a glance, that upstream needs
a debug symbols version of kgpg run to collect additional information,
but ubuntu provides only stripped binaries.
Are there packages containing split de
Public bug reported:
xmlto or docbook or docbook-dsssl or docbook-xml or docbook-xsl fails
with xsl:import : unable to load
http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/xsl/current/html/chunk.xsl
dpkg -l *docbook*
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Cfg-files/Unpacked/Failed-cfg
This is a major problem.
Ctrl+Alt+Backspace is a STANDARD DEFAULT key sequence.
This is deliberately breaking a feature that long time users, support
staff, and others expect to be there and work.
Deviating from established conventions such as this should require at
least two things.
1) A way t
I just got a crash that matched this bug description exactly. If it's
reproducible I'll open another bug.
--
konsole crashed with SIGSEGV in KWindowSystem::compositingActive()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/278588
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, whic
The Updates appear to work on my laptop
Disk
|-Swap
|-Boot
|-LVM
|-lv-Crypto-Root
|-lv-Crypto-Home
|-lv-Crypto-Other
--
udev repeatedly generates "change" events for the same block device(s)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332270
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Interesting, I followed a different guide when setting up my
lvm+cryptsetup system and I have not had an issue with initrds not
containing cryptsetup, -except- once when I used -u instead of -c to run
update-initramfs.
http://www.debuntu.org/how-to-encrypted-partitions-over-lvm-with-luks-
page-3-i
Scott, you have a strongly supported hypothesis, a problem domain of LVM
and -any- of the other watch rulesets.
Looking over every comment in this bug and everyone that mentions system
setup also seems to be running LVM in one way or another.
The topic in #ubuntu+1 should be updated to help colle
Unfortunately that does not seem to work on my test setup.
--
udev repeatedly generates "change" events for the same block device(s)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332270
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs m
Another workaround -might- be possible within grub then.
During menu-selection hit e to edit
arrow over the kernel line
e to edit the line
add (after a space) to the end 'maxcpus=1' and it might boot.
I'll see if I can test that.
--
udev repeatedly generates "change" events for the same block d
Yeah, Fishor if TJ is correct then what's happening is this.
Udev adds watches on any of these devices which you have...
disk/partition
lvm
crypto
raid
(any other device-mapper things)
Only, unfortunately, two or more of those are the same real device. A
race condition (which would probably be a
TJ if that's the case then this is probably a flaw of the entire block
IO system design.
In my mind, the ideal solution would be to have an abstraction which
eventually reduces to a list of raw devices and block-ranges of action
per device. When a watch or event occurs it would only be within tha
It would be nice if there were a status that reflected the general sentiment
of...
'Stale, possibly fixed with other updates'
** Changed in: xfdesktop4 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
xfdesktop crashed with SIGSEGV in g_list_foreach()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328377
You rece
Setting importance is a problem; only a restricted set of users may set
it.
I believe this bug may be effecting me as well. It seems to thrash the
system for around 5 min, and then I'm left with a bazillion sleeping
processes.
4635 root 20 0 845m 474m 39m R8 23.9 0:41.44 Xorg
309
If watch is the problem, what is it supposed to be doing anyway?
--
udev repeatedly generates "change" events for the same block device(s)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332270
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 332270 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332270
Confirmed as being duplicate. Only one line and a description of how to
make more were posted, but that's most definitely the signature of this
bug.
--
cannot boot with lvm-on-dmcrypt
https://bugs.launchpad
Odd, you shouldn't have a problem like "grep: /lib/udev/devices/ppp: No
such device or address"; that seems to indicate some kind of storage
corruption if I remember correctly. Though it may just be udev spamming
you.
--
[jaunty] doesn't boot anymore after udev upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Might be because my laptop only has a single disc and all my systems
that use raid have either 8.10 or gentoo on them... Sorry.
As a bonus, I would say this qualifies anyone using raid as I suspected
(any device-mapper based storage).
@MichaelEvans: Missed /lib/udev/rules.d/65
NS+="watch"
after that you can re-create your initrds and should be able to boot.
sudo update-initramfs -c -k $(uname -r)
(you can replace the $() part with all if you want.)
jh wrote 57 minutes ago: (permalink)
@MichaelEvans
# aptitude show udev
Package: udev
State: installed
Aut
You can try an older kernel, there's a chance it's initrd isn't tainted
with a set of rules that has watch in it; you'll then be able to boot in
and fix it.
Alternatively you can get in to your system via chrooting. That's a
bit of console work though, and really depends on how you set things up
It still failed to even try probing netconsole with a set of arguments
in the modules to include file.
--
netconsole logging for use during initrd
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/332873
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: linux-image-2.6.28-8-generic
I'm trying to enable netconsole logging on my 9.04 install. I can't use
a serial console as it is a laptop without one.
I edited
/etc/initramfs-tools/modules
to include the netconsole module, it shows up when I dump the con
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo