[Bug 1786863] Re: Task bar mouse pointer gets 'stuck' on arrow-pointing-to-hand

2018-08-14 Thread Steven Flintham
I've had a variant on this problem occur just now; the taskbar is now
permanently corrupt (it looks like some icon has been stuck half-
dragged, not that I was trying to drag anything). I've attached two
screenshots; corrupt-taskbar-1.png is when I first noticed this,
corrupt-taskbar-2.png is after experimentally dragging some icons on the
taskbar to see if it resolved things.

** Attachment added: "corrupt-taskbar-1.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinnamon/+bug/1786863/+attachment/5175211/+files/corrupt-taskbar-1.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786863

Title:
  Task bar mouse pointer gets 'stuck' on arrow-pointing-to-hand

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinnamon/+bug/1786863/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1786863] Re: Task bar mouse pointer gets 'stuck' on arrow-pointing-to-hand

2018-08-14 Thread Steven Flintham
** Attachment added: "corrupt-taskbar-2.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinnamon/+bug/1786863/+attachment/5175212/+files/corrupt-taskbar-2.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786863

Title:
  Task bar mouse pointer gets 'stuck' on arrow-pointing-to-hand

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinnamon/+bug/1786863/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1786863] Re: Task bar mouse pointer gets 'stuck' on arrow-pointing-to-hand

2018-08-13 Thread Steven Flintham
I just had this happen again, and *one* of the window icons on the
taskbar can no longer be selected - clicking on it has no effect, while
clicking on other window icons does bring them into the foreground. I am
not sure if this always happens, just sometimes with a window I haven't
tried to bring into the foreground, or if it is intermittent. But in any
case, this isn't purely cosmetic after all.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786863

Title:
  Task bar mouse pointer gets 'stuck' on arrow-pointing-to-hand

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinnamon/+bug/1786863/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1786863] [NEW] Task bar mouse pointer gets 'stuck' on arrow-pointing-to-hand

2018-08-13 Thread Steven Flintham
Public bug reported:

Sometimes - I'm afraid I don't know precisely what triggers it, I
suspect it is an accidental drag over a task bar icon - the mouse
pointer shown when hovering over the task bar gets stuck showing "small
hand with a small arrow below and to the right of it pointing at the
hand" instead of the usual arrow pointer. Once this happens I can't find
any way to get back to the normal pointer except using "ALT-F2 r" to
restart cinnamon. The pointer is fine over other windows when this
happens, it's just over the task bar. I can switch away to a virtual
console and back without it making any difference. This seems mostly
cosmetic; I can still click on icons on the task bar.

(I probably have the terminology wrong. By "task bar" I mean the bar
which shows the names of the open windows; clicking on one of the
windows shown on that bar brings that window to the foreground.)

This is with Ubuntu 18.04.1, the cinnamon package is 3.6.7-8ubuntu1.

** Affects: cinnamon (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786863

Title:
  Task bar mouse pointer gets 'stuck' on arrow-pointing-to-hand

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinnamon/+bug/1786863/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1701758] [NEW] Too easy to accidentally click restart when trying to suspend, with no confirmation requested

2017-06-30 Thread Steven Flintham
Public bug reported:

(This is an enhancement request. I don't know if this is the appropriate
place for it or not, please let me know if I should raise this
elsewhere.)

Choosing the "session" icon from the cinnamon menu opens a dialog box offering 
the choices:
- Suspend
- Restart
- Cancel
- Shutdown

If you miss the Suspend button and click on Restart, the system restarts
with no warning or chance to abort. There should either be a
confirmation dialog on choosing Restart, or the Suspend option should be
physically separated from the other options somehow. (Suspend is
fundamentally different, as it doesn't destroy any work, whereas Restart
and Shutdown do.)

I am running Ubuntu 16.04 with cinnamon 3.4.3-1~xenial0:

$ apt-cache policy cinnamon
cinnamon:
  Installed: 3.4.3-1~xenial0
  Candidate: 3.4.3-1~xenial0
  Version table:
 *** 3.4.3-1~xenial0 500
500 http://ppa.launchpad.net/embrosyn/cinnamon/ubuntu xenial/main amd64 
Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 2.8.6-1ubuntu1 500
500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial/universe amd64 Packages

steven@riemann:~$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS
Release:16.04

Please let me know if you need any more information.

** Affects: cinnamon (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1701758

Title:
  Too easy to accidentally click restart when trying to suspend, with no
  confirmation requested

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cinnamon/+bug/1701758/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1701756] [NEW] dpkg reports invalid character in version number on package 'compiz'

2017-06-30 Thread Steven Flintham
Public bug reported:

When performing package related operations I get a warning about an
invalid character in version number. For example:

$ dpkg -l compiz
dpkg-query: warning: parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 8322 package 
'compiz':
 error in 'Version' field string '1:0.9.12.2+6.04.20160823-0ubuntu1': invalid 
character in version number
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ NameVersionArchitecture   Description
+++-===-==-==-
ii  compiz  1:0.9.12.2+allOpenGL window and 
compositing manager

$ sudo aptitude upgrade
No packages will be installed, upgraded, or removed.
0 packages upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B of archives. After unpacking 0 B will be used.
dpkg-query: warning: parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 8322 package 
'compiz':
 error in 'Version' field string '1:0.9.12.2+6.04.20160823-0ubuntu1': invalid 
character in version number
dpkg: warning: parsing file '/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 8322 package 
'compiz':
 error in 'Version' field string '1:0.9.12.2+6.04.20160823-0ubuntu1': invalid 
character in version number
 
I am running 16.04:
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS
Release:16.04

Please let me know if you need any more information.

** Affects: compiz (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1701756

Title:
  dpkg reports invalid character in version number on package 'compiz'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/compiz/+bug/1701756/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1084318] [NEW] growisofs does not detect attempts to burn too much data even when -dry-run is used

2012-11-28 Thread Steven Flintham
Public bug reported:

I had a set of files I wanted to burn to a BD-R disc but wasn't sure if
they would fit or not. I used -dry-run to check that no error was
generated. I then performed the actual burn which failed 97% of the way
into the burn with a 'No space left on device error'.

The simulated shell session below shows the situation. [Since I was not
taking a log of the terminal output and the actual burn caused the
original dry run to scroll off the screen, I have recreated it - I put
in a fresh disc (from the same batch) in order to genrate the -dry-run
output. The output from ls -l and both growisofs invocations is
genuinely copy-and-pasted from the temrinal, it is just that the -dry-
run output is not the output from the dry run I did before the failed
burn.]

$ ls -l
total 24307920
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven 1052695689 Nov  3 18:56 vhs-1000a.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven 1083126819 Nov  3 19:14 vhs-1000b.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven 1083174525 Nov  3 19:42 vhs-1000c.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven  497238606 Nov  3 19:24 vhs-1000d.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven204 Nov  3 20:32 vhs-1000.txt
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven  978945163 Nov  3 21:48 vhs-1001a.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven  924884933 Nov  4 02:10 vhs-1001b.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven  460940875 Nov  4 13:11 vhs-1001c.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven   28732475 Nov  4 14:34 vhs-1001d.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven 81 Nov  4 01:58 vhs-1001.txt
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven 1012172356 Nov  4 17:23 vhs-1002a.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven 1034447960 Nov  4 19:49 vhs-1002b.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven  938083234 Nov  4 22:06 vhs-1002c.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven101 Nov  4 21:48 vhs-1002.txt
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven  665536352 Nov  4 23:41 vhs-1003a.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven 1044379623 Nov  5 01:53 vhs-1003b.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven  185381342 Nov  5 21:34 vhs-1003c.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven  815451754 Nov  6 00:32 vhs-1003d.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven  210324637 Nov  6 00:17 vhs-1003e.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven  305323343 Nov  6 00:38 vhs-1003f.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven103 Nov  6 00:01 vhs-1003.txt
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven 1023484503 Nov  6 23:13 vhs-1004a.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven  436810767 Nov  7 00:31 vhs-1004b.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven139 Nov  6 23:50 vhs-1004.txt
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven 1044175788 Nov 10 11:31 vhs-1005a.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven  765090192 Nov 10 15:19 vhs-1005b.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven176 Nov 10 16:19 vhs-1005.txt
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven  975131320 Nov 10 21:33 vhs-1006a.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven 1005047976 Nov 10 20:32 vhs-1006b.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven 1044469239 Nov 10 23:11 vhs-1006c.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven  161754066 Nov 11 00:23 vhs-1006d.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven 79 Nov 11 01:24 vhs-1006.txt
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven  779149699 Nov 11 16:54 vhs-1007a.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven  238524689 Nov 11 17:04 vhs-1007b.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven 1023501103 Nov 11 17:42 vhs-1007c.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven  947615221 Nov 11 19:55 vhs-1007d.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven 81 Nov 11 19:42 vhs-1007.txt
-rw-rw-r-- 2 steven steven  903519912 Nov 12 00:14 vhs-1008a.m4v
-rw-rw-r-- 2 steven steven  160640989 Nov 15 00:51 vhs-1008c.m4v
-rw-rw-r-- 2 steven steven 26 Nov 11 23:14 vhs-1008.txt
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven 1129221727 Nov 18 23:30 vhs-1009a.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven  932119524 Nov 20 23:33 vhs-1009c.m4v
-r--r--r-- 2 steven steven 69 Nov 20 21:20 vhs-1009.txt
$ growisofs -dry-run -Z /dev/dvd5 -R -J -V "VHS rips 1" .
Executing 'genisoimage -R -J -V VHS rips 1 . | builtin_dd of=/dev/dvd5 obs=32k 
seek=0'
I: -input-charset not specified, using utf-8 (detected in locale settings)
Using VHS_1000.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1001d.m4v (vhs-1001b.m4v)
Using VHS_1005.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1003a.m4v (vhs-1003e.m4v)
Using VHS_1007.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1003e.m4v (vhs-1003d.m4v)
Using VHS_1008.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1003e.m4v (vhs-1007c.m4v)
Using VHS_100A.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1007c.m4v (vhs-1007b.m4v)
Using VHS_100B.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1009c.m4v (vhs-1009a.m4v)
Using VHS_100C.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1001d.m4v (vhs-1000d.m4v)
Using VHS_100D.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1003e.m4v (vhs-1008c.m4v)
Using VHS_100E.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1003d.m4v (vhs-1003c.m4v)
Using VHS_100F.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1008c.m4v (vhs-1008a.m4v)
Using VHS_100G.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1007b.m4v (vhs-1007a.m4v)
Using VHS_100H.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1003a.m4v (vhs-1005b.m4v)
Using VHS_100I.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1002a.m4v (vhs-1002c.m4v)
Using VHS_100J.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1004a.m4v (vhs-1004b.m4v)
Using VHS_100K.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1001b.m4v (vhs-1001c.m4v)
Using VHS_100L.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1002c.m4v (vhs-1002b.m4v)
Using VHS_100M.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1007a.m4v (vhs-1007d.m4v)
Using VHS_100N.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1000d.m4v (vhs-1000a.m4v)
Using VHS_100O.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1000a.m4v (vhs-1000b.m4v)
Using VHS_100P.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1003c.m4v (vhs-1003b.m4v)
Using VHS_100Q.M4V;1 for  /vhs-1001c.m4v (vhs-100

[Bug 1084318] Dependencies.txt

2012-11-28 Thread Steven Flintham
apport information

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084318/+attachment/3446357/+files/Dependencies.txt

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1084318

Title:
  growisofs does not detect attempts to burn too much data even when
  -dry-run is used

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dvd+rw-tools/+bug/1084318/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 925260] Re: Update Manager icon appears on the launcher when updates are available, clicking on it does not bring up the update-manager.

2012-07-30 Thread Steven Flintham
I've experienced this but in my case the update manager window "opens",
but the contents of the window don't draw. Killing update manager and
restarting it seems to resolve it. (This is on 12.04, but I'm pretty
sure I've had it occurring intermittently for at least a year or two.)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/925260

Title:
  Update Manager icon appears on the launcher when updates are
  available, clicking on it does not bring up the update-manager.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/925260/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 738446] Re: abiword prints attached document incorrectly

2011-09-28 Thread Steven Flintham
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 277404 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277404

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 277404
   hp laserjet postscript text print does not print some characters

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738446

Title:
  abiword prints attached document incorrectly

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/abiword/+bug/738446/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 738446] Re: abiword prints attached document incorrectly

2011-03-19 Thread Steven Flintham
** Attachment added: "Opening and printing this file shows a rectangle instead 
of the final 'H'"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738446/+attachment/1921835/+files/corrupt-h.abw

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738446

Title:
  abiword prints attached document incorrectly

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 738446] [NEW] abiword prints attached document incorrectly

2011-03-19 Thread Steven Flintham
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: abiword

If I load and print the attached document, the 'H' in 'CM99 2XH' is
printed as a rectangle. (It looks fine in print preview though). If I
explicitly add ' H' to the end of the first line of the address and
print, the 'H' in 'CM99 2XH' prints fine but the 'X' is replaced by a
rectangle instead.

The document was created via cut-and-paste from OpenOffice, if that
turns out to be relevant.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: abiword 2.8.6-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-27.48-generic 2.6.35.11
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-27-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Mar 19 22:00:39 2011
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007)
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: abiword

** Affects: abiword (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/738446

Title:
  abiword prints attached document incorrectly

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 737225] Re: On startup, everything except the logo is illegible

2011-03-17 Thread Steven Flintham
The attached screenshot shows what happens

** Attachment added: "Illustration of illegible screen"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/extremetuxracer/+bug/737225/+attachment/1916180/+files/Screenshot.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737225

Title:
  On startup, everything except the logo is illegible

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 737225] Re: On startup, everything except the logo is illegible

2011-03-17 Thread Steven Flintham
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737225

Title:
  On startup, everything except the logo is illegible

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 737225] [NEW] On startup, everything except the logo is illegible

2011-03-17 Thread Steven Flintham
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: extremetuxracer

I am sorry if I am missing something, but when I start extremetuxracer,
the logo at the top of the screen is perfect but the text on the menu is
illegible. If I click on menu options they seem to work, but it's
impossible to actually tell what I'm choosing.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: extremetuxracer 0.4-2ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-27.48-generic 2.6.35.11
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-27-generic x86_64
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Mar 17 22:57:41 2011
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.10 "Maverick Meerkat" - Release amd64 (20101007)
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: extremetuxracer

** Affects: extremetuxracer (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug maverick

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/737225

Title:
  On startup, everything except the logo is illegible

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 652171] Re: Add ability to split to a scan into two pages

2010-09-30 Thread Steven Flintham
Sorry, I think my comment above is slightly off or at least confusingly
worded. What I guess my simple solution would really boil down to would
be a new button which effectively is 'pretend you scanned a new page,
but really just use this one again'. You could then use that between
cropping two 'sub-pages' of a double page spread.

-- 
Add ability to split to a scan into two pages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652171
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 652171] Re: Add ability to split to a scan into two pages

2010-09-30 Thread Steven Flintham

** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652171/+attachment/1658151/+files/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652171/+attachment/1658152/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652171/+attachment/1658153/+files/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652171/+attachment/1658154/+files/Lspci.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652171/+attachment/1658155/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652171/+attachment/1658156/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652171/+attachment/1658157/+files/ProcModules.txt

** Attachment added: "SimpleScanLog.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652171/+attachment/1658158/+files/SimpleScanLog.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652171/+attachment/1658159/+files/UdevDb.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652171/+attachment/1658160/+files/UdevLog.txt

-- 
Add ability to split to a scan into two pages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652171
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 652171] [NEW] Add ability to split to a scan into two pages

2010-09-30 Thread Steven Flintham
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: simple-scan

When scanning a multi-page document such as a book where a double page
spread fits onto the scanner, it would be nice to be able to crop out
two separate regions which become two distinct pages in the scanned
document. At the moment it seems to be necessary to use some other tool
to post-process the scanned document or scan each double page spread
twice and crop out the desired page each time.

At the simplest level, I think this could be done by providing buttons which 
perform each half of the 'Scan' button's behaviour. The 'Scan' button 
effectively seem to do the following:
- add the (cropped, if cropping is in use) current page to the document being 
built up
- scan a new page

If these two pieces of functionality were made available separately, it
would be possible to crop out the first page of a double page spread,
click 'add', crop out the second page of the double page spread, then
click 'scan' (or 'add' and 'scan without add').

Obviously it would also be possible to implement this by allowing two
crop areas at the same time, but I thought the above would be simple to
implement and fairly simple to use.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: simple-scan 1.0.3-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.43-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Sep 30 17:06:50 2010
DriverPackageVersions:
 libsane 1.0.20-13ubuntu2
 libsane-extras N/A
 hplip 3.10.2-2ubuntu2.1
 hpoj N/A
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100427.1)
Lsusb:
 Bus 002 Device 003: ID 04a9:220e Canon, Inc. CanoScan N1240U/LiDE 30
 Bus 002 Device 002: ID 15d9:0a4d Dexon 
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 001 Device 003: ID 058f:6362 Alcor Micro Corp. Hi-Speed 21-in-1 Flash Card 
Reader/Writer (Internal/External)
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-24-generic 
root=UUID=f26cb0e0-986a-44c8-a4cf-4d6cfa127ae9 ro quiet splash
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: simple-scan
dmi.bios.date: 01/13/2006
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 0702
dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: A8N-VM
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0702:bd01/13/2006:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnA8N-VM:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion:
dmi.product.name: System Product Name
dmi.product.version: System Version
dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer

** Affects: simple-scan (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid

-- 
Add ability to split to a scan into two pages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652171
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 652166] Re: Ask for confirmation when New is click with unsaved pages scanned

2010-09-30 Thread Steven Flintham

** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652166/+attachment/1658124/+files/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652166/+attachment/1658125/+files/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652166/+attachment/1658126/+files/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652166/+attachment/1658127/+files/Lspci.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652166/+attachment/1658128/+files/ProcCpuinfo.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652166/+attachment/1658129/+files/ProcInterrupts.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652166/+attachment/1658130/+files/ProcModules.txt

** Attachment added: "SimpleScanLog.txt"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652166/+attachment/1658131/+files/SimpleScanLog.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652166/+attachment/1658132/+files/UdevDb.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652166/+attachment/1658133/+files/UdevLog.txt

-- 
Ask for confirmation when New is click with unsaved pages scanned
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652166
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 652166] [NEW] Ask for confirmation when New is click with unsaved pages scanned

2010-09-30 Thread Steven Flintham
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: simple-scan

I was scanning a multiple page document with Simple Scan when I
accidentally clicked 'New' instead of 'Scan'. (They are right next to
each other, which doesn't help.) Simple Scan happily threw my unsaved
scans away without asking me if I was sure. Can we please have a
confirmation dialog?

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: simple-scan 1.0.3-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.43-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Thu Sep 30 17:02:54 2010
DriverPackageVersions:
 libsane 1.0.20-13ubuntu2
 libsane-extras N/A
 hplip 3.10.2-2ubuntu2.1
 hpoj N/A
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100427.1)
Lsusb:
 Bus 002 Device 003: ID 04a9:220e Canon, Inc. CanoScan N1240U/LiDE 30
 Bus 002 Device 002: ID 15d9:0a4d Dexon 
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 001 Device 003: ID 058f:6362 Alcor Micro Corp. Hi-Speed 21-in-1 Flash Card 
Reader/Writer (Internal/External)
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-24-generic 
root=UUID=f26cb0e0-986a-44c8-a4cf-4d6cfa127ae9 ro quiet splash
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: simple-scan
dmi.bios.date: 01/13/2006
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 0702
dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: A8N-VM
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0702:bd01/13/2006:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnA8N-VM:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion:
dmi.product.name: System Product Name
dmi.product.version: System Version
dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer

** Affects: simple-scan (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid

-- 
Ask for confirmation when New is click with unsaved pages scanned
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652166
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 515670] Re: keybinding properties doesn't remove a shortcut correctly

2010-09-23 Thread Steven Flintham
I accidentally filed a duplicate with GNOME. The 'primary' upstream bug
is https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=625228.

-- 
keybinding properties doesn't remove a shortcut correctly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515670
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 515670] Re: keybinding properties doesn't remove a shortcut correctly

2010-09-23 Thread Steven Flintham
I have experienced what I believe to be the same bug in Ubuntu 10.04.
Since I couldn't see any sign of the above bug having been forwarded, I
have raised the following in the GNOME bug tracker:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630411

** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #630411
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630411

** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #625228
   https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=625228

-- 
keybinding properties doesn't remove a shortcut correctly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/515670
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 598902] Re: Confusing printer properties for HP 2605

2010-08-07 Thread Steven Flintham
Thanks a lot, I can confirm that the halftone etc options no longer have
'duplicate' names.

I can also see a 'Printer Resolution' option under 'Image Quality'. I
must admit I am now confused as to how this works, since I can
apparently specify the resolution there *and* in the 'Print Color as
Gray' option. If 'Print Color as Grey' was a simple yes/no choice, it
would make sense, but it allows me to choose resolution as well.

I have performed a couple of test printouts and they worked; I am not
going to pretend I am enough of an expect to distinguish whether the
options are working correctly.

-- 
Confusing printer properties for HP 2605
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598902
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 614583] [NEW] gwibber ceases to display Twitter feed after hibernating

2010-08-06 Thread Steven Flintham
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: gwibber

When I hibernate my machine and then resume late, gwibber never updates
again. Even manually choosing Gwibber->Refresh does nothing. Other net-
using applications work fine. Quitting gwibber and restarting it doesn't
seem to help.

I tried to invoke gwibber from the command line and got this:

ste...@riemann:~$ gwibber

** (gwibber:25307): WARNING **: Trying to register gtype
'WnckWindowState' as enum when in fact it is of type 'GFlags'

** (gwibber:25307): WARNING **: Trying to register gtype
'WnckWindowActions' as enum when in fact it is of type 'GFlags'

** (gwibber:25307): WARNING **: Trying to register gtype 
'WnckWindowMoveResizeMask' as enum when in fact it is of type 'GFlags'
Updating...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/gwibber", line 67, in 
client.Client()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/client.py", line 447, in 
__init__
self.w = GwibberClient()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/client.py", line 41, in 
__init__
if len(json.loads(self.service.GetAccounts())) == 0:
  File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/proxies.py", line 140, in __call__
**keywords)
  File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/connection.py", line 620, in 
call_blocking
message, timeout)
dbus.exceptions.DBusException: org.freedesktop.DBus.Python.AttributeError: 
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/dbus/service.py", line 702, in _message_cb
retval = candidate_method(self, *args, **keywords)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/gwibber/microblog/dispatcher.py", line 
491, in GetAccounts
for account in self.accounts.get_records(COUCH_TYPE_ACCOUNT, True):
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/desktopcouch/records/server_base.py", 
line 482, in get_records
exists = self.view_exists(view_name, design_doc)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/desktopcouch/records/server_base.py", 
line 429, in view_exists
self.with_reconnects(self.db.__getitem__, doc_id)["views"]
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/desktopcouch/records/server_base.py", 
line 168, in with_reconnects
self._reconnect()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/desktopcouch/records/server_base.py", 
line 176, in _reconnect
if self._database_name not in self._server:
  File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/couchdb/client.py", line 124, in 
__contains__
self.resource.head(validate_dbname(name))
  File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/couchdb/client.py", line 981, in head
return self._request('HEAD', path, headers=headers, **params)
  File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/couchdb/client.py", line 1014, in _request
resp, data = _make_request()
  File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/couchdb/client.py", line 1009, in 
_make_request
body=body, headers=headers)
  File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/httplib2/__init__.py", line 1129, in 
request
(response, content) = self._request(conn, authority, uri, request_uri, 
method, body, headers, redirections, cachekey)
  File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/httplib2/__init__.py", line 901, in 
_request
(response, content) = self._conn_request(conn, request_uri, method, body, 
headers)
  File "/usr/lib/pymodules/python2.6/httplib2/__init__.py", line 871, in 
_conn_request
response = conn.getresponse()
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/httplib.py", line 984, in getresponse
method=self._method)
  File "/usr/lib/python2.6/httplib.py", line 330, in __init__
self.fp = sock.makefile('rb', 0)
AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'makefile'

I then killed gwibber-service. This time restarting gwibber worked.

** Affects: gwibber (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
gwibber ceases to display Twitter feed after hibernating
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614583
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 613078] Re: Black lines appear at bottom of maximised gnome-terminal/terminator window after minimising a maximised covering window

2010-08-03 Thread Steven Flintham

** Attachment added: "Partial screenshot showing the corruption"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53004048/Screenshot.png

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/53003996/Dependencies.txt

-- 
Black lines appear at bottom of maximised gnome-terminal/terminator window 
after minimising a maximised covering window
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613078
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 613078] [NEW] Black lines appear at bottom of maximised gnome-terminal/terminator window after minimising a maximised covering window

2010-08-03 Thread Steven Flintham
Public bug reported:

In both gnome-terminal and terminator, I can reliably generate minor corruption 
of the terminal window as follows:
- open a terminal window
- maximise it to full screen
- ensure the terminal background is white
- open another window (e.g. Firefox or Thunderbird) to full screen, covering 
the terminal window
- minimise the covering window
- black 'bars' appear in the lowest row of pixels in the terminal window (see 
attached screenshot)

I suspect this has something to do with the bottom part of the terminal
window which is not large enough for a line of text; if the terminal
window happens to be a multiple of the text height it may not happen. (I
have not tried to confirm this.) I am using a 1440x900 screen resolution
with a panel at the top and bottom. My 'Visual Effects' setting is
'None'.

I am filing this against vte as I can reproduce it in two terminal
emulators.

If you need any more information please let me know. Apologies if this
is a duplicate, but I did read through all the other rendering bugs and
nothing seemed to match this.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: libvte9 1:0.23.5-0ubuntu1.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-24.38-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-24-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Aug  3 18:09:21 2010
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100427.1)
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: vte

** Affects: vte (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid

-- 
Black lines appear at bottom of maximised gnome-terminal/terminator window 
after minimising a maximised covering window
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613078
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 577916] Re: lucid regression: does not resume from hibernation

2010-07-13 Thread Steven Flintham
My hibernate stopped working after a fresh install of 10.04. Symptoms
were that it would appear to hibernate correctly, but on restart would
just boot to the login screen and once I logged in networking was
disabled.

Following the above I had a look at /etc/initramfs-tools/conf.d/resume -
it didn't exist. I ran:

sudo update-initramfs -u

and it didn't generate any errors but that file still didn't exist
afterwards.

I manually populated the file with:

RESUME=UUID=7482c5cb-6168-45dd-bfce-041561c80512

and ran the update command again. It said:

update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.32-23-generic
cryptsetup: WARNING: found more than one resume device candidate:
 /dev/sdb5
 UUID=7482c5cb-6168-45dd-bfce-041561c80512

These are both the same device, although my fstab refers to the swap
device by UUID.

Anyway, I hibernated and this time it worked - I got a 'resuming'
message on the boot screen after the grub menu.

So I suspect my problem was some sort of mismatch over the swap
partition name, though I have no idea how it came about.

For what it's worth, I left my old partitions in place (originally
created by an Ubuntu installed back in 2005/2006 - I did in-place
upgrades until this time) when I installed 10.04. The installer refused
to recognise my swap partition (I cannot remember the details, I'm
afraid) and I had to do the install without swap (no problem as I have
2GB RAM) and manually add the swap myself afterwards. So maybe I added
it badly, I suspect I copied the /etc/fstab line from the backup I had
taken before the reinstall (left to my own devices I would probably just
have called it /dev/sdb5) but I can no longer be sure.

Sorry this is a bit vague but I thought the information just might be
useful. And thanks to the guys above for pointing me in the direction of
a solution.

-- 
lucid regression: does not resume from hibernation
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577916
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 604799] Re: Preview pane shows no images

2010-07-12 Thread Steven Flintham

** Attachment added: "A sample of the problem."
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51802069/xzgv-missing-thumbnails.png

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/51801804/Dependencies.txt

-- 
Preview pane shows no images
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604799
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs



[Bug 604799] [NEW] Preview pane shows no images

2010-07-12 Thread Steven Flintham
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xzgv

When I start xzgv, the preview pane shows no thumbnails. Sometimes
directory icons show up, but rarely (except for ".." which is always
visible). If I press "u" to regenerate thumbnails the problem is fixed.
If I close and re-open xzgv on the same directory the problem is still
there, i.e. the problem is not due to missing thumbnails, regenerating
them simply triggers something which causes the thumbnails to be
displayed.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: xzgv 0.9+svn40-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-23.37-generic 2.6.32.15+drm33.5
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-23-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Mon Jul 12 22:05:38 2010
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100427.1)
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANG=en_GB.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: xzgv

** Affects: xzgv (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid

-- 
Preview pane shows no images
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604799
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 598902] Re: Confusing printer properties for HP 2605

2010-06-26 Thread Steven Flintham
Thanks for such a clear and prompt response. You say the PPD for this
printer *in Postscript mode* is broken. Is there another non-Postscript
PPD which works better (and if so how can I install it), or am I reading
too much into your words? My driver selection dialog lists the driver I
reported the bug against and one more, 'HP Color Laserjet 2605
Foomatic/Postscript [en]' driver, but that doesn't appear to support
colour printing at all.

Thanks once again.

-- 
Confusing printer properties for HP 2605
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598902
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 598902] Re: Confusing printer properties for HP 2605

2010-06-26 Thread Steven Flintham

** Attachment added: "Screenshot showing empty Image Quality section"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50964865/Screenshot-2.png

-- 
Confusing printer properties for HP 2605
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598902
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 598902] Re: Confusing printer properties for HP 2605

2010-06-26 Thread Steven Flintham

** Attachment added: "Screenshot showing confusing Color Options"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50964860/Screenshot-1.png

** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50964176/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "CupsErrorLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50964177/CupsErrorLog.txt

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50964178/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50964179/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "Locale.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50964180/Locale.txt

** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50964181/Lspci.txt

** Attachment added: "PrintingPackages.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50964182/PrintingPackages.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50964183/ProcCpuinfo.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50964184/ProcInterrupts.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50964185/ProcModules.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50964186/UdevDb.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50964187/UdevLog.txt

-- 
Confusing printer properties for HP 2605
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598902
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 598902] [NEW] Confusing printer properties for HP 2605

2010-06-26 Thread Steven Flintham
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: cups

The 'Color Options' in the printer properties for the HP Color Laserjet
2605 using the recommended driver are confusing, with multiple drop-down
lists with the same name. See attached screenshot 1. My understanding
based on web searches is that these repeated options specify the desired
configuration for different printing modes (text, graphics and photo).
This is not at all clear from the dialog. Moreover, I cannot see any way
to choose which of these three printing modes to use.

I believe this is upstream (hplip) bug 236734, although the behaviour is
not identical - the screenshot in the upstream bug shows an additional
'Color Options' choice at the start, which may be a way to choose one of
the three printing modes. In any case, that choice is not visible on my
machine.

There is also an apparently empty section 'Image Quality' at the bottom
of the 'Printer Options', which is at best ugly and to my mind suggests
some kind of error in the PPD or its interpretation. See attached
screenshot 2.

Both the confusing 'Color Options' section and the empty 'Image Quality'
section are the same in the local CUPS web page
(http://localhost:631/admin/#HPColorOptionsPanel), allowing for the
different presentation.

This can be reproduced without owning the printer - I found this bug
while examining the support for this printer prior to purchasing.

Detailed steps to reproduce:
- choose System->Administration->Printing from the top menu
- click Add in the Printing window toolbar
- choose 'LPT #1' and click Forward (I have nothing attached to the parallel 
port, for what it is worth)
- choose 'HP' and click Forward
- choose 'Color Laserjet 2605' under 'Models'
- leave the default option of 'HP Color Laserjet 2605 Postscript [en] 
(recommended)' selected under 'Drivers'
- click Forward
- click Forward
- click Apply
- say 'No' to printing a test page
- right-click on the newly added printer in the Printing window and choose 
Properties
- select 'Printer Options' in the list box at the left of the properties dialog
- scroll down to 'Color Options' to see the duplicate drop-down menus
- scroll down to the bottom to see the 'orphan' header 'Image Quality'

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: cups 1.4.3-1ubuntu1.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.36-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Jun 26 21:59:20 2010
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100427.1)
Lpstat: Error: command ['lpstat', '-v'] failed with exit code 1: lpstat: No 
destinations added.
Lsusb:
 Bus 002 Device 002: ID 045e:0084 Microsoft Corp. Basic Optical Mouse
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 001 Device 002: ID 058f:6362 Alcor Micro Corp. Hi-Speed 21-in-1 Flash Card 
Reader/Writer (Internal/External)
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name
Papersize: a4
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-22-generic 
root=UUID=6954574a-bda6-46a7-9708-778400b38c48 ro quiet splash
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_GB.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: cups
dmi.bios.date: 01/13/2006
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 0702
dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: A8N-VM
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0702:bd01/13/2006:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnA8N-VM:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion:
dmi.product.name: System Product Name
dmi.product.version: System Version
dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer

** Affects: cups (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid

-- 
Confusing printer properties for HP 2605
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598902
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 598896] Re: Contradictory information about downloadable driver

2010-06-26 Thread Steven Flintham

** Attachment added: "Screenshot showing the contradictory dialog"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50964094/Screenshot-New%20Printer.png

** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50963482/BootDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "CupsErrorLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50963483/CupsErrorLog.txt

** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50963484/CurrentDmesg.txt

** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50963485/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: "Locale.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50963486/Locale.txt

** Attachment added: "Lspci.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50963487/Lspci.txt

** Attachment added: "PrintingPackages.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50963488/PrintingPackages.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfo.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50963489/ProcCpuinfo.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcInterrupts.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50963490/ProcInterrupts.txt

** Attachment added: "ProcModules.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50963491/ProcModules.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevDb.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50963492/UdevDb.txt

** Attachment added: "UdevLog.txt"
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50963493/UdevLog.txt

-- 
Contradictory information about downloadable driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598896
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 598896] [NEW] Contradictory information about downloadable driver

2010-06-26 Thread Steven Flintham
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: cups

The system claims a driver is and is not downloadable for HP 2605dn.

To reproduce:
- no printer needed (I found this bug while checking support for this model 
prior to purchasing)
- Choose System->Administration->Printing from the top menu
- click Add in the Printing window toolbar
- choose 'LPT #1' (I have nothing connected to my parallel port, for what it's 
worth)
- click Forward
- choose 'Search for a printer driver to download'
- type '2605dn' in the 'Make and model' text box
- click Search
- 'HP Color Laserjet 2605dn' appears in the 'Printer model' drop down menu
- click Forward
- the window changes to the attached screenshot, saying that 'there are drivers 
available for download' but with nothing apparently visible in the 
'Downloadable Drivers' section, which is partly obscured by a large box saying 
'With this choice no driver download will be performed. In the next steps a 
locally installed driver will be selected.'
- despite the text in the box obscuring the 'Downloadable Drivers' section, the 
'Forward' button is greyed out so there is no way to proceed to the 'next steps'

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.04
Package: cups 1.4.3-1ubuntu1.2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.32-22.36-generic 2.6.32.11+drm33.2
Uname: Linux 2.6.32-22-generic i686
Architecture: i386
Date: Sat Jun 26 21:36:41 2010
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100427.1)
Lpstat: Error: command ['lpstat', '-v'] failed with exit code 1: lpstat: No 
destinations added.
Lsusb:
 Bus 002 Device 002: ID 045e:0084 Microsoft Corp. Basic Optical Mouse
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 001 Device 002: ID 058f:6362 Alcor Micro Corp. Hi-Speed 21-in-1 Flash Card 
Reader/Writer (Internal/External)
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
MachineType: System manufacturer System Product Name
Papersize: a4
ProcCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-2.6.32-22-generic 
root=UUID=6954574a-bda6-46a7-9708-778400b38c48 ro quiet splash
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_GB.utf8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: cups
dmi.bios.date: 01/13/2006
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 0702
dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: A8N-VM
dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK Computer INC.
dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Asset-1234567890
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: Chassis Manufacture
dmi.chassis.version: Chassis Version
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr0702:bd01/13/2006:svnSystemmanufacturer:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKComputerINC.:rnA8N-VM:rvrRev1.xx:cvnChassisManufacture:ct3:cvrChassisVersion:
dmi.product.name: System Product Name
dmi.product.version: System Version
dmi.sys.vendor: System manufacturer

** Affects: cups (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 lucid

-- 
Contradictory information about downloadable driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598896
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 597302] [NEW] Please package new upstream version 2.2.16

2010-06-22 Thread Steven Flintham
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: dbmail

I had problems with some messages temporarily becoming invisible in
mailboxes. I believe this is due to upstream bug 827
(http://www.dbmail.org/mantis/view.php?id=827). I have built my own
local package of 2.2.16 and the problem seems to be resolved.

It would be good if Ubuntu had a more recent version than 2.2.11
packaged. If my local build is anything to go by, this should involve no
more than dropping in the new tarball, updating the changelog etc and
rebuilding.

Thanks.

** Affects: dbmail (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Please package new upstream version 2.2.16
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/597302
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 596274] [NEW] dbmail package has incorrect entry in md5sums

2010-06-19 Thread Steven Flintham
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: dbmail

On a clean installation of Ubuntu 10.04, I did:

# aptitude install dbmail
# aptitude install debsums
# debsums -s

and debsums complained:

debsums: missing file /usr/share/dbmail/default.dbmail (from dbmail
package)

I can indeed see an entry for this file in
/var/lib/dpkg/info/dbmail.md5sums but it doesn't exist.

I think it should either be installed with the package or not included
in the list of md5sums.

Package versions are dbmail 2.2.11-1build1, debsums 2.0.48.

Thanks.

Steve

** Affects: dbmail (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
dbmail package has incorrect entry in md5sums
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/596274
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 109629] Re: 3com NIC stops working after some time

2008-09-12 Thread Steven Flintham
As requested I have upgraded to the following kernel:

Linux riemann 2.6.27-2-generic #1 SMP Thu Aug 28 17:20:02 UTC 2008 i686
GNU/Linux

and have not seen the problem. I also never saw it with the previous
kernel, vmlinuz-2.6.24-21-generic. I did experience it earlier,
apologies for not immediately reporting this when I upgraded to
whichever precise kernel fixed it but since I never saw a notice
claiming the bug was fixed I forgot about it.

Thanks.

-- 
3com NIC stops working after some time
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109629
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 182341] Second CPU not always used

2008-01-12 Thread Steven Flintham
Public bug reported:

Hi, I am running boinc 5.10.8 with the [EMAIL PROTECTED] project on my Athlon
64X2 box (with the 32-bit version of Ubuntu). When it first starts up it
correctly runs two rosetta_beta processes to use both CPUs, but
sometimes one of them disappears and doesn't come back. I don't know if
this is due to the process crashing, but it only ever seems to go from
2->1, not 1->0. If I do 'sudo /etc/init.d/boinc-client restart', I get
two processes again.

Thanks.

Steve

** Affects: boinc (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Second CPU not always used
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182341
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 135300] Accessing File menu after starting OpenOffice locks up machine for approx 10 mins

2007-08-28 Thread Steven Flintham
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: openoffice.org

Hi, I suspect this is not going to be a useful report, but I'll do what
I can, and if you need any more details let me know.

When I start OpenOffice, I usually go to the File menu (to e.g. open a
document, or print one if I opened a document from the command line with
'oowriter foo'). When I do that, often (but not always, I think) my
entire machine locks up. I used to think it had crashed and just
rebooted, but lately I have noticed that if I wait for what seems like
5-10 minutes everything comes back OK. I don't think it is swapping as
there is not continual hard drive activity during this time. Usually the
mouse pointer will follow mouse movements, but the keyboard LEDs are
unresponsive and I am unable to perform any operations using the mouse
(e.g. switching to a terminal to see what processes might be eating
CPU).

I am using what I believe to be a bog-standard version of Feisty Fawn. I
am using the proprietary fglrx X server, since I am unable to get
anything else to work with my Radeon X1300 card, this may or may not be
relevant.

I don't know what else I can say, I couldn't see any similar bug reports
so thought I would raise this as an issue even though I doubt there's
enough information here to be helpful. I should say this has been
happening for a long time, but up until recently when I noticed the
machine had not locked up permanently, I just put it down to the X
server crashing and decided it wasn't worth reporting since it's
proprietary software. Any suggestions on how I could investigate this
further would be gratefully received. Thanks.

** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Accessing File menu after starting OpenOffice locks up machine for approx 10 
mins
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/135300
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 79668] Re: Average Bit Rate MP3s report incorrect length

2007-08-21 Thread Steven Flintham
Thanks, I have been noticing this continually but just to be sure have
re-tested it now and it is still occurring; a 3m 3s track just ripped is
shown in rhythmbox as a 7m 22s track. Trying wit other applications:

'mp3info -x' gives a length of 3m 3s (correct)
mplayer gives a length of 7m 22s (incorrect, matching rhythmbox)
totem gives a length of 3m 1-10s (correct-ish; the track length shown 
fluctuates during play!)

I'd be happy to examine the file with any tools you can recommend and
provide the output if you think it would help.

I have tried downloading the tribe 4 CD to test this but it failed, I
think my CD image may have been corrupt. I will try again later and let
you know the result.

-- 
Average Bit Rate MP3s report incorrect length
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/79668
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 92325] Re: [edgy] firefox crash

2007-03-15 Thread Steven Flintham
Sorry, I have tried three times but even bzipped the crash report is too
big and I get a '500 Internal Server Error', so please ignore this
report. Thanks.

-- 
[edgy] firefox crash
https://launchpad.net/bugs/92325

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 92325] Firefox crashed during normal use

2007-03-14 Thread Steven Flintham
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: firefox

Version is: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-GB; rv:1.8.1.2)
Gecko/20060601 Firefox/2.0.0.2 (Ubuntu-edgy)

I've attached the reduced report; the complete report was 67MB, which
seems a bit like overkill.

** Affects: firefox (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
Firefox crashed during normal use
https://launchpad.net/bugs/92325

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 92325] Re: Firefox crashed during normal use

2007-03-14 Thread Steven Flintham

** Attachment added: "Reduced report generated by firefox"
   
http://librarian.launchpad.net/6806385/_usr_lib_firefox_firefox-bin.3vvahN.crash

-- 
Firefox crashed during normal use
https://launchpad.net/bugs/92325

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 79668] Re: Average Bit Rate MP3s report incorrect length

2007-01-16 Thread Steven Flintham
Sorry, I should have been more explicit - the incorrect track length can
be (for example) 16 minutes when the track is about 5-6 minutes or
similar. It's not always that extreme either. It's never ridiculously
large or small, so I don't think it's a negative number being treated as
positive or anything like that. I think it's always on the high side,
but I can't be certain.

-- 
Average Bit Rate MP3s report incorrect length
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79668

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 79668] Average Bit Rate MP3s report incorrect length

2007-01-16 Thread Steven Flintham
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: sound-juicer

Hi,

I have set up a GNOME audio profile to encode my MP3s (which I rip using
Sound Juicer) as 80kbps ABR. When I play these (for example, but not
exclusively) using Rhythmbox, they show an incorrect track length. I
have older MP3s which I ripped using jack+lame (on Debian, not Ubuntu)
which display the length correctly. I note bug #63851, but since I am
using different packages and having read the history of that bug I'm not
sure it's the same.

The GStreamer pipeline for this audio profile is:

audio/x-raw-int,rate=44100,channels=2 ! lame name=enc vbr=abr vbr-mean-
bitrate=80 ! id3mux

I've raised this against Sound Juicer since that's at the 'start' of the
ripping process, but I can imagine the bug (if there is one; I'm not
GStreamer expert and may have missed something important from that
pipeline) is actually in GStreamer, lame or something else - I hope you
can re-assign appropriately if so.

Thanks.

Steve

** Affects: sound-juicer (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
Average Bit Rate MP3s report incorrect length
https://launchpad.net/bugs/79668

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs