Re: [Bug 1964387] Re: pysol.py crashed with ModuleNotFoundError in /usr/share/games/pysolfc/pysollib/ui/tktile/tkhtml.py: No module named 'formatter'

2024-03-21 Thread cwsnyder
I have been using the flatpak version, and it works.

On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 5:31 PM Sudip Mukherjee <1964...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:

> The upstream patch at
>
> https://github.com/shlomif/PySolFC/commit/79d27d2749c906040073909a2a7c1162282b806c
> will need changes in the copyright file and has been discussed at
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pysolfc/+bug/1967793/comments/8
>
> ** Changed in: pysolfc (Ubuntu Jammy)
>  Assignee: Sudip Mukherjee (sudipmuk) => (unassigned)
>
> ** Changed in: pysolfc (Ubuntu Mantic)
>  Assignee: Sudip Mukherjee (sudipmuk) => (unassigned)
>
> ** Changed in: pysolfc (Ubuntu Noble)
>  Assignee: Sudip Mukherjee (sudipmuk) => (unassigned)
>
> ** Changed in: pysolfc (Ubuntu Jammy)
>Status: In Progress => Confirmed
>
> ** Changed in: pysolfc (Ubuntu Mantic)
>Status: In Progress => Confirmed
>
> ** Changed in: pysolfc (Ubuntu Noble)
>Status: In Progress => Confirmed
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
> duplicate bug report (2043814).
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964387
>
> Title:
>   pysol.py crashed with ModuleNotFoundError in
>   /usr/share/games/pysolfc/pysollib/ui/tktile/tkhtml.py: No module named
>   'formatter'
>
> Status in pysolfc package in Ubuntu:
>   Confirmed
> Status in pysolfc source package in Jammy:
>   Confirmed
> Status in pysolfc source package in Mantic:
>   Confirmed
> Status in pysolfc source package in Noble:
>   Confirmed
> Status in pysolfc package in Debian:
>   New
>
> Bug description:
>   just trying to play the game. this OS is up to  date
>
>   ProblemType: Crash
>   DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
>   Package: pysolfc 2.6.4-3
>   ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-22.22-generic 5.15.19
>   Uname: Linux 5.15.0-22-generic x86_64
>   ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu78
>   Architecture: amd64
>   CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
>   CurrentDesktop: XFCE
>   Date: Wed Mar  9 12:50:56 2022
>   ExecutablePath: /usr/share/games/pysolfc/pysol.py
>   InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-03-08 (1 days ago)
>   InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Alpha amd64
> (20220307)
>   InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python3.10
>   PackageArchitecture: all
>   ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python3 /usr/games/pysolfc
>   Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.10, Python 3.10.2, python3-minimal,
> 3.10.1-0ubuntu1
>   PythonArgs: ['/usr/games/pysolfc']
>   PythonDetails: N/A
>   SourcePackage: pysolfc
>   Title: pysol.py crashed with ModuleNotFoundError in
> /usr/share/games/pysolfc/pysollib/ui/tktile/tkhtml.py: No module named
> 'formatter'
>   UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
>   UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pysolfc/+bug/1964387/+subscriptions
>
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1964387

Title:
  pysol.py crashed with ModuleNotFoundError in
  /usr/share/games/pysolfc/pysollib/ui/tktile/tkhtml.py: No module named
  'formatter'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pysolfc/+bug/1964387/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1891324] Re: Groovy Gorilla GRUB won't install to MBR

2021-12-18 Thread cwsnyder
Newer builds, including the 22.04 daily builds GRUB will install to MBR
after Xubuntu is installed, but the installer can't be correctly directed
to install on my machines BIOS/MBR. I must install, go to the Live version,
then repair GRUB. The installer on all versions demands to install on an
EFI/boot partition, and said EFI partition must be there during the install
process, even though my machine is old enough that said EFI is not picked
up during the boot process.

On Sat, Dec 18, 2021, 4:30 AM Chris Guiver <1891...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:

> Thank you for reporting this bug to Ubuntu.
>
> Ubuntu 20.10 (groovy) reached end-of-life on July 22, 2021.
>
> See this document for currently supported Ubuntu releases:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Releases
>
> We appreciate that this bug may be old and you might not be interested
> in discussing it any more. But if you are then please upgrade to the
> latest Ubuntu version and re-test. If you then find the bug is still
> present in the newer Ubuntu version, please add a comment here telling
> us which new version it is in.
>
> ** Changed in: grub-installer (Ubuntu)
>Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891324
>
> Title:
>   Groovy Gorilla GRUB won't install to MBR
>
> Status in grub-installer package in Ubuntu:
>   Incomplete
>
> Bug description:
>   Tried 3 different daily builds, multiple distributions on /dev/sda.
>   Can't install GRUB to /dev/sda or /dev/sda1 which is my / pqrtition,
>   either. Errors out and usually messes up the previous GRUB install.
>
>   ProblemType: Bug
>   DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
>   Package: ubiquity 20.10.9
>   ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-42.46-generic 5.4.44
>   Uname: Linux 5.4.0-42-generic x86_64
>   NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
>   ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu44
>   Architecture: amd64
>   CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
>   CasperVersion: 1.452
>   Date: Wed Aug 12 08:01:22 2020
>   InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz
> file=/cdrom/preseed/xubuntu.seed maybe-ubiquity quiet splash ---
>   LiveMediaBuild: Xubuntu 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Alpha amd64 (20200811)
>   SourcePackage: grub-installer
>   UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1891324/+subscriptions
>
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891324

Title:
  Groovy Gorilla GRUB won't install to MBR

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1891324/+subscriptions


-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1891324] Re: Groovy Gorilla GRUB won't install to MBR

2020-11-15 Thread cwsnyder
Most computers built in the last 10 years use EFI firmware, which does
not use an MBR, instead using GPT formatting and a boot partition for
all but the smallest of drives. I didn't detect the problem in the
early daily builds when I initially installed Groovy, only when I
re-installed at the beta.

On 11/14/20, jonas-ska <1891...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> It's amazing that users with MBR are simply unable to install 20.10. The
> only option is to install 20.04 and then upgrade. I can't understand how
> such an evident bug passed all the testing. Nobody uses MBR anymore?
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891324
>
> Title:
>   Groovy Gorilla GRUB won't install to MBR
>
> Status in grub-installer package in Ubuntu:
>   Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
>   Tried 3 different daily builds, multiple distributions on /dev/sda.
>   Can't install GRUB to /dev/sda or /dev/sda1 which is my / pqrtition,
>   either. Errors out and usually messes up the previous GRUB install.
>
>   ProblemType: Bug
>   DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
>   Package: ubiquity 20.10.9
>   ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-42.46-generic 5.4.44
>   Uname: Linux 5.4.0-42-generic x86_64
>   NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
>   ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu44
>   Architecture: amd64
>   CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
>   CasperVersion: 1.452
>   Date: Wed Aug 12 08:01:22 2020
>   InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz
> file=/cdrom/preseed/xubuntu.seed maybe-ubiquity quiet splash ---
>   LiveMediaBuild: Xubuntu 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Alpha amd64 (20200811)
>   SourcePackage: grub-installer
>   UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1891324/+subscriptions
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891324

Title:
  Groovy Gorilla GRUB won't install to MBR

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1891324/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1891324] [NEW] Groovy Gorilla GRUB won't install to MBR

2020-08-12 Thread cwsnyder
Public bug reported:

Tried 3 different daily builds, multiple distributions on /dev/sda.
Can't install GRUB to /dev/sda or /dev/sda1 which is my / pqrtition,
either. Errors out and usually messes up the previous GRUB install.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10
Package: ubiquity 20.10.9
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-42.46-generic 5.4.44
Uname: Linux 5.4.0-42-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs zunicode zavl icp zcommon znvpair
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu44
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CasperVersion: 1.452
Date: Wed Aug 12 08:01:22 2020
InstallCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz file=/cdrom/preseed/xubuntu.seed 
maybe-ubiquity quiet splash ---
LiveMediaBuild: Xubuntu 20.10 "Groovy Gorilla" - Alpha amd64 (20200811)
SourcePackage: grub-installer
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: grub-installer (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug groovy ubiquity-20.10.9 xubuntu

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1891324

Title:
  Groovy Gorilla GRUB won't install to MBR

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1891324/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1644982] [NEW] package postfix-sqlite 3.1.3-4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/postfix/postfix-sqlite.so.1.0.1', which is also in package postfix 3.1.3-2

2016-11-26 Thread cwsnyder
Public bug reported:

Keeps showing up shortly after login.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
Package: postfix-sqlite 3.1.3-4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-26.28-generic 4.8.0
Uname: Linux 4.8.0-26-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.3-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Nov 15 18:02:39 2016
DuplicateSignature:
 package:postfix-sqlite:3.1.3-4
 Unpacking postfix-sqlite (3.1.3-3) ...
 dpkg: error processing archive 
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-6Rlqn8/46-postfix-sqlite_3.1.3-3_amd64.deb (--unpack):
  trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/postfix/postfix-sqlite.so.1.0.1', which is also 
in package postfix 3.1.3-2
ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/postfix/postfix-sqlite.so.1.0.1', 
which is also in package postfix 3.1.3-2
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-11-04 (22 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 17.04 "Zesty Zapus" - Alpha amd64 (20161103)
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.18.10ubuntu1
 apt  1.3.1
SourcePackage: postfix
Title: package postfix-sqlite 3.1.3-4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to 
overwrite '/usr/lib/postfix/postfix-sqlite.so.1.0.1', which is also in package 
postfix 3.1.3-2
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: postfix (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package need-duplicate-check package-conflict zesty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644982

Title:
  package postfix-sqlite 3.1.3-4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to
  overwrite '/usr/lib/postfix/postfix-sqlite.so.1.0.1', which is also in
  package postfix 3.1.3-2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1644982/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1644982] Re: package postfix-sqlite 3.1.3-4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/postfix/postfix-sqlite.so.1.0.1', which is also in package postfix 3.1.3-2

2016-11-26 Thread cwsnyder
This install of zappity which has been in use for about 2 weeks now, and
have upgraded at least 4 times. I keep thinking it will be fixed by the
next upgrade, using apt-get because the update manager keeps failing
with an error on a Mate desktop repository.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1644982

Title:
  package postfix-sqlite 3.1.3-4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to
  overwrite '/usr/lib/postfix/postfix-sqlite.so.1.0.1', which is also in
  package postfix 3.1.3-2

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/postfix/+bug/1644982/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1637732] [NEW] Can't configure apt-on-cd Ubuntu Mate 17.04 daily

2016-10-29 Thread cwsnyder
Public bug reported:

Attempting to install from live USB, install failed twice attempting to
install further packages from the USB.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
Package: ubiquity 16.10.14
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.8.0-26.28-generic 4.8.0
Uname: Linux 4.8.0-26-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.3-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
CasperVersion: 1.379
Date: Sat Oct 29 10:34:21 2016
InstallCmdLine: file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu-mate.seed boot=casper 
initrd=/casper/initrd.lz quiet splash ---
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu-MATE 17.04 "Zesty Zapus" - Alpha amd64 (20161029)
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=unknown
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 LC_NUMERIC=C.UTF-8
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubiquity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug ubiquity-16.10.14 ubuntu-mate zesty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637732

Title:
  Can't configure apt-on-cd Ubuntu Mate 17.04 daily

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1637732/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1509302] Re: package virtualbox 5.0.4-dfsg-2 failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 1

2015-11-07 Thread cwsnyder
This affects me also, after removing virtualbox 4.3, could not install
via Ubuntu Software Center on Xubuntu 15.10 Wiley.  Downloaded the .deb
for VirtualBox 5.0.4-dfsg-2.  This attempt failed to install via
gdebi/dpkg.  Attempted to install via Synaptic, which kicked me here as
a duplicated error.  VirtualBox-qt and VirtualBox-dkms reported
installation failure.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1509302

Title:
  package virtualbox 5.0.4-dfsg-2 failed to install/upgrade: подпроцесс
  установлен сценарий post-installation возвратил код ошибки 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/virtualbox/+bug/1509302/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1078695] Re: xrandr : Failed to get size of gamma for output default

2015-09-03 Thread cwsnyder
Have you tried the *vga=###* where ### is one of the valid VGA values,
using this on the GRUB linux kernel line?  This has worked for me on some
recent kernels/x-servers where xrandr can't force the screen resolution.  I
have used this with *nouveau.noaccel=1* and sometimes *acpi=off* in problem
situations to force the resolution where hardware acceleration enabled just
causes the graphics processor to freeze, causing a reboot necessary.  This
does NOT work on GNOME, KDE, Unity, Cinnamon, etc., but does work for Mate
and Xfce without Compiz enabled.

Hope this helps.

Carl Snyder

On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 4:45 PM, BJB <1078...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:

> Trying to solve #874694 (only getting 640x480 maximum resolution instead
> of 1024x768), I see also an Amilo L6820 with Intel 82845G/GL/GE Chipset.
> This blocks my attempts to force the screen resolution at xrandr level.
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078695
>
> Title:
>   xrandr : Failed to get size of gamma for output default
>
> Status in x11-utils package in Ubuntu:
>   Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
>   I have been tracking in the Ubuntu & Linux Mint forums when people have
> problems with the resolution of their screens not being able to be set to
> the native resolution of their displays.  Normally, that can be fixed by
> either xrandr or xorg.conf settings, but occasionally when xrandr is typed
> on a line by itself to check the configuration of the X display, the return
> is [code]$ xrandr
>   xrandr : failed to get size of gamma for output default
>   Screen 0: blah blah
>   default :  more blah blah[/code]When this has occurred, the output
> maximum resolution can NOT be changed, and I haven't found any way to fix
> the problem.
>
>   [background] My particular rig is a custom built with a BIOStar N68S3B
>   motherboard, AMD Athlon II x3 processor, 8G RAM, nVidia GeForce 7025
>   display adapter on the motherboard, Etronix 1701B display.  I have
>   fought getting my maximum resolution (1280x1024) on this monitor since
>   7.10 Gutsy Gibbon, and used a custom xorg.conf file until it stopped
>   working, around 9.10, and have used xrandr since.  (I stopped using
>   Ubuntu as my primary OS of choice when Unity came out, because my rig
>   did not support Compiz or graphics acceleration.  Xubuntu, Linux Mint
>   Debian Edition, or Debian are my primaries now.) The EDID on this
>   monitor is not read correctly/has never been read correctly, and I
>   have always been stuck with the default resolution on Live media,
>   except occasionally on Puppy or Elive, through two different main
>   machines.  My first Linux install was on an eMachines T5212 with an
>   nVidia GeForce 6200 128M graphics memory, 2G RAM.[/Background]
>
>   I noticed that on a Bodhi 2.0 Live media that the xrandr did not work
>   because x11-xserver-utils package was not installed.  I was checking
>   out the Live media, because my Bodhi 2.0 virtual machine exhibits the
>   same problems reported by laptop users, that is, the Failed to get
>   size of gamma for output default and unable to use xrandr to add a
>   higher resolution display.  When I added the x11-xserver-utils package
>   to the Live running install, I could use xrandr to properly get the
>   size of gamma and reset the display to 1280x1024.  I re-installed from
>   the SAME live media to my Bodhi VirtualBox VM, still the same graphics
>   problem.  x11-xserver-utils was installed during updates, but xrandr
>   still returned no gamma, display as 'default', and no ability to set
>   resolution higher than 1024x768 detected at install.
>
>   I still have about 2 weeks laid-off from my primary work, so if there
>   is anything further I can do to help, just let me know.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/x11-utils/+bug/1078695/+subscriptions
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078695

Title:
  xrandr : Failed to get size of gamma for output default

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/x11-utils/+bug/1078695/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1428880] [NEW] nvidia-304-updates 304.125-0ubuntu1: nvidia-304-updates kernel module failed to build

2015-03-05 Thread cwsnyder
Public bug reported:

error occurred when starting the desktop (Xubuntu).

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 15.04
Package: nvidia-304-updates 304.125-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.18.0-12.13-generic 3.18.4
Uname: Linux 3.18.0-12-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.16.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
DKMSKernelVersion: 3.19.0-7-generic
Date: Sat Feb 28 20:15:21 2015
DuplicateSignature: 
dkms:nvidia-304-updates:304.125-0ubuntu1:/var/lib/dkms/nvidia-304-updates/304.125/build/nv.c:2029:30:
 error: ‘struct file’ has no member named ‘f_dentry’
InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-01-04 (60 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 15.04 Vivid Vervet - Alpha amd64 (20150103)
PackageVersion: 304.125-0ubuntu1
SourcePackage: nvidia-graphics-drivers-304-updates
Title: nvidia-304-updates 304.125-0ubuntu1: nvidia-304-updates kernel module 
failed to build
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: nvidia-graphics-drivers-304-updates (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package vivid

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1428880

Title:
  nvidia-304-updates 304.125-0ubuntu1: nvidia-304-updates kernel module
  failed to build

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-304-updates/+bug/1428880/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 756818] Re: Unity Live session nvidia display unuseable

2014-11-01 Thread cwsnyder
No real change in effect, Unity, GNOME 3.x, and Cinnamon still unusable.

Hardware was changed to a BioStar N68S38 motherboard/Athlon II x3 processor/8G 
RAM/Graphics:  Card: NVIDIA C61 [GeForce 7025 / nForce 630a] 
   X.Org: 1.15.1 drivers: nouveau (unloaded: fbdev,vesa) Resolution: 
1280x1024@60.0hz 
   GLX Renderer: Gallium 0.4 on NV4C GLX Version: 2.1 Mesa 10.1.3
Monitor: Etronix 1701B 17 1280x1024 LCD display does not give proper edid
I can now sometimes get a stable display on one of the three above DEs.until I 
attempt to actually open menu items, then the display freezes or goes for 
repeated pattern of dots on the screen, in either case the display freezes 
after a few seconds, requiring hard reset or power cycling
Knoppix with LXDE  Compiz works fine, as does Bodhi 2.x and 3.x and Xubuntu 
and Mate have remained working with no problems.
I am thinking that all three of the above do not handle the case where the edid 
is not returned from the monitor to the computer acceptably.
My only other monitor had been an old NEC Multisync II (800x600), but I 
obtained a Sansui model SLED 2900 I television/monitor and seeking confirmation.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756818

Title:
  Unity Live session nvidia  display unuseable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/756818/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 756818] Re: Unity Live session nvidia display unuseable

2014-11-01 Thread cwsnyder
The Sansui monitor trial reminded me that there are other outcomes
beside the freezing and repeating pattern of dots.  This trial set
ALMOST worked from the trials of the LIVE disks of Unity, GNOME, KDE
Plasma, and Cinnamon desktops, but random patterns made the display
still unusable.  The graphics did not freeze, and the nVidia proprietary
driver may have worked, did not try in this set of trials.  The other
outcome which happened on Unity, GNOME/GNOME Classic and Cinnamon was to
have yellow and white on white background for the screen text and other
graphic elements, rendering most text onscreen unusable.  BTW, the
Sansui SLED2900I model was capable of 1280x1024.

I tried Ubuntu 14.04 for Unity.  Xubuntu 14.04  14.10 worked fine, as
is PCLinuxOS LXDE.

Next test would be to check using the nVidia proprietary driver and/or
installed system.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756818

Title:
  Unity Live session nvidia  display unuseable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/756818/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 756818] Re: Unity Live session nvidia display unuseable

2014-11-01 Thread cwsnyder
With the Sansui monitor, I was able to install the nvidia-current
package and get a stable display.  nvidia-current had not helped with
the Etronix 1701B monitor on which the edid was not read correctly.  I
am typing this on a Unity desktop on 14.04, so my problems seem to have
been solved.  I also tried on GNOME desktop with similar results.

My problem seems to have been a combination of hardware (edid not
reading properly) and driver (nouveau) not working together, and I will
so report publicly.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756818

Title:
  Unity Live session nvidia  display unuseable

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/756818/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 1078695] Re: xrandr : Failed to get size of gamma for output default

2014-04-26 Thread cwsnyder
I am not having the error under the present kernel 14.04 and open source
driver.  I have had the error while using nvidia-current and previous
kernels and once using the nvidia open source driver and Xubuntu 13.10.
 Also had the reported problem with Bodhi (based on 12.04 at the time.)  I
updated to Xubuntu 14.04 pre-alpha and have not had any problems to report
with this version.  The last trial I made with Ubuntu 14.04, same setup, my
graphics froze, diagonal random graphics, requiring a hard reboot to
recover, but I have had similar problems with Ubuntu Unity since Unity was
introduced, running on my desktop.

My Acer Aspire One ZG5 netbook with Intel graphics has never had this
problem, nor the freezing with Unity desktop.


On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Ketil Malde ke...@malde.org wrote:

 I don't know if it is relevant here, but I got the same response from
 xrandr (about gamma), and also struggled with wrong resolutions. For me,
 the cause was the 'nomodeset' kernel parameter, this (i.e. disabling
 kernel modesetting) caused the i915 graphics driver to fail, and the
 vesa driver to be used instead.  Perhaps you can check in
 /var/log/Xorg.0.log that the correct driver is being used?  The log also
 contains the kernel command linke - although you may have to use
 'nomodeset' to get nvidia to work (that was the reason it was in mine -
 when I removed the graphics card, I forgot to revert the grub options).

 --
 You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
 report.
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078695

 Title:
   xrandr : Failed to get size of gamma for output default

 Status in “x11-utils” package in Ubuntu:
   Confirmed

 Bug description:
   I have been tracking in the Ubuntu  Linux Mint forums when people have
 problems with the resolution of their screens not being able to be set to
 the native resolution of their displays.  Normally, that can be fixed by
 either xrandr or xorg.conf settings, but occasionally when xrandr is typed
 on a line by itself to check the configuration of the X display, the return
 is [code]$ xrandr
   xrandr : failed to get size of gamma for output default
   Screen 0: blah blah
   default :  more blah blah[/code]When this has occurred, the output
 maximum resolution can NOT be changed, and I haven't found any way to fix
 the problem.

   [background] My particular rig is a custom built with a BIOStar N68S3B
   motherboard, AMD Athlon II x3 processor, 8G RAM, nVidia GeForce 7025
   display adapter on the motherboard, Etronix 1701B display.  I have
   fought getting my maximum resolution (1280x1024) on this monitor since
   7.10 Gutsy Gibbon, and used a custom xorg.conf file until it stopped
   working, around 9.10, and have used xrandr since.  (I stopped using
   Ubuntu as my primary OS of choice when Unity came out, because my rig
   did not support Compiz or graphics acceleration.  Xubuntu, Linux Mint
   Debian Edition, or Debian are my primaries now.) The EDID on this
   monitor is not read correctly/has never been read correctly, and I
   have always been stuck with the default resolution on Live media,
   except occasionally on Puppy or Elive, through two different main
   machines.  My first Linux install was on an eMachines T5212 with an
   nVidia GeForce 6200 128M graphics memory, 2G RAM.[/Background]

   I noticed that on a Bodhi 2.0 Live media that the xrandr did not work
   because x11-xserver-utils package was not installed.  I was checking
   out the Live media, because my Bodhi 2.0 virtual machine exhibits the
   same problems reported by laptop users, that is, the Failed to get
   size of gamma for output default and unable to use xrandr to add a
   higher resolution display.  When I added the x11-xserver-utils package
   to the Live running install, I could use xrandr to properly get the
   size of gamma and reset the display to 1280x1024.  I re-installed from
   the SAME live media to my Bodhi VirtualBox VM, still the same graphics
   problem.  x11-xserver-utils was installed during updates, but xrandr
   still returned no gamma, display as 'default', and no ability to set
   resolution higher than 1024x768 detected at install.

   I still have about 2 weeks laid-off from my primary work, so if there
   is anything further I can do to help, just let me know.

 To manage notifications about this bug go to:

 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/x11-utils/+bug/1078695/+subscriptions


-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078695

Title:
  xrandr : Failed to get size of gamma for output default

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/x11-utils/+bug/1078695/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1196520] [NEW] package linux-image-3.8.0-19-generic 3.8.0-19.29 failed to install/upgrade: package linux-image-3.8.0-19-generic is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `ha

2013-07-01 Thread cwsnyder
Public bug reported:

Just installed xubuntu in /dev/sda11, with updates installed during
installation.

After the initial updates and installation, there were additional
updates to 80 packages, including the kernel.

What looked to be the final action prior to finishing the update process
was to install the kernel update, during which the computer froze for
over 10 minutes.  I hit the reset button and was unable to boot the
system from the hard drive.  Booted from a Live DVD of Xubuntu and was
unable to detect my hard drive.  Installed gparted and still was unable
to detect /dev/sda.  Re-booted from Xubuntu Live and was able to get to
GRUB, going to Xubuntu.  This is the second re-boot of Xubuntu, the
first of which I tried apt-get update  apt-get -f install .   Both
times a crash was reported and attempted to report the crash both times,
this time successfully.

I still have 39 or 40 updates listed by the update manager.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04
Package: linux-image-3.8.0-19-generic 3.8.0-19.29
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-25.37-generic 3.8.13
Uname: Linux 3.8.0-25-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu8
AptOrdering: linux-image-3.8.0-19-generic: Configure
Architecture: i386
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  carl   1757 F pulseaudio
CRDA: Error: command ['iw', 'reg', 'get'] failed with exit code 1: nl80211 not 
found.
Date: Mon Jul  1 08:29:49 2013
DuplicateSignature:
 Unpacking replacement libxrender1:i386 ...
Log started: 2013-07-01  08:29:49
 dpkg: error processing linux-image-3.8.0-19-generic (--configure):
  package linux-image-3.8.0-19-generic is not ready for configuration
ErrorMessage: package linux-image-3.8.0-19-generic is not ready for 
configuration  cannot configure (current status `half-installed')
HibernationDevice: RESUME=UUID=68a199aa-e6c7-43f5-8d53-38b2df382884
InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-07-01 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Release i386 (20130424)
IwConfig:
 lono wireless extensions.
 
 eth0  no wireless extensions.
Lsusb:
 Bus 002 Device 002: ID 046d:c05a Logitech, Inc. Optical Mouse M90
 Bus 002 Device 003: ID 0e8f:0022 GreenAsia Inc. 
 Bus 002 Device 004: ID 058f:9360 Alcor Micro Corp. 8-in-1 Media Card Reader
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
MachineType: BIOSTAR Group N68S3B
MarkForUpload: True
ProcFB: 0 nouveaufb
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.8.0-25-generic 
root=UUID=f71dd1ba-bbe0-402c-ab0f-ecccb76e71f9 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No 
PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
RelatedPackageVersions: grub-pc 2.00-13ubuntu3
RfKill:
 
SourcePackage: linux
Title: package linux-image-3.8.0-19-generic 3.8.0-19.29 failed to 
install/upgrade: package linux-image-3.8.0-19-generic is not ready for 
configuration  cannot configure (current status `half-installed')
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 11/12/2010
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: 080015
dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: N68S3B
dmi.board.vendor: BIOSTAR Group
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: None
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: BIOSTAR Group
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr080015:bd11/12/2010:svnBIOSTARGroup:pnN68S3B:pvr:rvnBIOSTARGroup:rnN68S3B:rvr:cvnBIOSTARGroup:ct3:cvr:
dmi.product.name: N68S3B
dmi.sys.vendor: BIOSTAR Group

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386 need-duplicate-check raring

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196520

Title:
  package linux-image-3.8.0-19-generic 3.8.0-19.29 failed to
  install/upgrade: package linux-image-3.8.0-19-generic is not ready for
  configuration  cannot configure (current status `half-installed')

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1196520/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1196520] Re: package linux-image-3.8.0-19-generic 3.8.0-19.29 failed to install/upgrade: package linux-image-3.8.0-19-generic is not ready for configuration cannot configure (current status `half

2013-07-01 Thread cwsnyder
I was able to complete the installation by re-installing the 3.8.0-19-generic 
kernel using apt-get install , then I did an
apt-get update
apt-get dist-upgrade -y
and the installation seems to be fine.

I have no indication which I understand as to why the problem occurred,
but my Xubuntu installation seems to be working fine.

I was able to use the PPA for LibreOffice pre-releases to install
LibreOffice Writer  Calc 4.1 and separately install Chromium with no
noted errors.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196520

Title:
  package linux-image-3.8.0-19-generic 3.8.0-19.29 failed to
  install/upgrade: package linux-image-3.8.0-19-generic is not ready for
  configuration  cannot configure (current status `half-installed')

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1196520/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1078695] Re: xrandr : Failed to get size of gamma for output default

2012-12-29 Thread cwsnyder
I found a fix for the 'failed to get size of gamma for output default'
which was causing the problems keeping the higher resolutions from being
used.

In using xrandr according to the https://wiki.ubuntu.com/X/Config/Resolution 
guide to add higher resolutions and xrandr returns the gamma error, I was able 
to fix the problem by adding --gamma 1:1:1 to the xrandr --output line, as 
follows:
xrandr --output default --gamma 1:1:1 --mode 1280x1024
where xrandr returns the output name as default, and the modename is from a 
newly defined, higher resolution mode.

I got this to work properly with my Etronix 1701B 1280x1024 pixel 17
LCD monitor from an Ubuntu 13.04 virtual machine which was reporting the
gamma problem and display name 'default', with a Bodhi 2.0 virtual
machine and a Bodhi 2.0 Live CD, all three exhibiting the 'default'
display and 'failed to get size of gamma for output default'.

The display does not immediately resize, but the new mode can be chosen
from the arandr GUI.  After selection, when the dialog box pops up, I
select to keep that selection.  On the next log out or restart, the
default is at 1280x1024 as selected before, even at the login screen and
at the desktop.

Note: several modes greater than the previous 1024x768 maximum were also
allowed, including modes which actually exceded the maximum of my
monitor.

I think this bug report can be closed, with proper documentation.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078695

Title:
  xrandr : Failed to get size of gamma for output default

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/x11-utils/+bug/1078695/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1078695] Re: xrandr : Failed to get size of gamma for output default

2012-12-08 Thread cwsnyder
I have a 'fix' for the bug which may work, but doesn't fix the
underlying cause.  If the proprietary drivers can be installed, or
simply a different video driver, this may read the gamma and allow for
re-sizing the display.  I found a Live DVD (Linux Mint 14 Cinnamon)
which caused the same problem of not reading the gamma, but when I
installed nvidia-current under the Live session, I was able to get a
gamma reading and re-size the display to add 1280x1024@60Hz.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078695

Title:
  xrandr : Failed to get size of gamma for output default

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/x11-utils/+bug/1078695/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1078695] [NEW] xrandr : Failed to get size of gamma for output default

2012-11-14 Thread cwsnyder
Public bug reported:

I have been tracking in the Ubuntu  Linux Mint forums when people have 
problems with the resolution of their screens not being able to be set to the 
native resolution of their displays.  Normally, that can be fixed by either 
xrandr or xorg.conf settings, but occasionally when xrandr is typed on a line 
by itself to check the configuration of the X display, the return is [code]$ 
xrandr
xrandr : failed to get size of gamma for output default
Screen 0: blah blah
default :  more blah blah[/code]When this has occurred, the output maximum 
resolution can NOT be changed, and I haven't found any way to fix the problem.

[background] My particular rig is a custom built with a BIOStar N68S3B
motherboard, AMD Athlon II x3 processor, 8G RAM, nVidia GeForce 7025
display adapter on the motherboard, Etronix 1701B display.  I have
fought getting my maximum resolution (1280x1024) on this monitor since
7.10 Gutsy Gibbon, and used a custom xorg.conf file until it stopped
working, around 9.10, and have used xrandr since.  (I stopped using
Ubuntu as my primary OS of choice when Unity came out, because my rig
did not support Compiz or graphics acceleration.  Xubuntu, Linux Mint
Debian Edition, or Debian are my primaries now.) The EDID on this
monitor is not read correctly/has never been read correctly, and I have
always been stuck with the default resolution on Live media, except
occasionally on Puppy or Elive, through two different main machines.  My
first Linux install was on an eMachines T5212 with an nVidia GeForce
6200 128M graphics memory, 2G RAM.[/Background]

I noticed that on a Bodhi 2.0 Live media that the xrandr did not work
because x11-xserver-utils package was not installed.  I was checking out
the Live media, because my Bodhi 2.0 virtual machine exhibits the same
problems reported by laptop users, that is, the Failed to get size of
gamma for output default and unable to use xrandr to add a higher
resolution display.  When I added the x11-xserver-utils package to the
Live running install, I could use xrandr to properly get the size of
gamma and reset the display to 1280x1024.  I re-installed from the SAME
live media to my Bodhi VirtualBox VM, still the same graphics problem.
x11-xserver-utils was installed during updates, but xrandr still
returned no gamma, display as 'default', and no ability to set
resolution higher than 1024x768 detected at install.

I still have about 2 weeks laid-off from my primary work, so if there is
anything further I can do to help, just let me know.

** Affects: x11-utils (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078695

Title:
  xrandr : Failed to get size of gamma for output default

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/x11-utils/+bug/1078695/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1022281] [NEW] package python3-distupgrade 1:0.168 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/DistUpgrade/utils.py', which is also in package python3-update-ma

2012-07-08 Thread cwsnyder
Public bug reported:

Ubuntu Quantal VirtualBox install, July 8, 2012

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: python3-distupgrade 1:0.168
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-3.3-generic 3.5.0-rc5
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-3-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.2.5-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Jul  8 09:15:06 2012
DuplicateSignature:
 Unpacking python3-distupgrade (from .../python3-distupgrade_1%3a0.168_all.deb) 
...
 dpkg: error processing 
/var/cache/apt/archives/python3-distupgrade_1%3a0.168_all.deb (--unpack):
  trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/DistUpgrade/utils.py', 
which is also in package python3-update-manager 1:0.164
ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite 
'/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/DistUpgrade/utils.py', which is also in package 
python3-update-manager 1:0.164
InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Alpha amd64 (20120528)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
Title: package python3-distupgrade 1:0.168 failed to install/upgrade: trying to 
overwrite '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/DistUpgrade/utils.py', which is also 
in package python3-update-manager 1:0.164
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package dist-upgrade package-conflict quantal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022281

Title:
  package python3-distupgrade 1:0.168 failed to install/upgrade: trying
  to overwrite '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/DistUpgrade/utils.py',
  which is also in package python3-update-manager 1:0.164

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1022281/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1022281] Re: package python3-distupgrade 1:0.168 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/DistUpgrade/utils.py', which is also in package python3-update-mana

2012-07-08 Thread cwsnyder
-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1022281

Title:
  package python3-distupgrade 1:0.168 failed to install/upgrade: trying
  to overwrite '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/DistUpgrade/utils.py',
  which is also in package python3-update-manager 1:0.164

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1022281/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1019864] Re: update-manager crashed

2012-07-01 Thread cwsnyder
** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1019864

Title:
  update-manager crashed

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1019864/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1017177] [NEW] update-manager crashed with ImportError in /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeQuirks.py: No module named plugincore.manager

2012-06-24 Thread cwsnyder
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1013490 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013490

Public bug reported:

Crash occurred when using Software Updater to attempt to update
packages.  I usually haven't been able to use the updater package, but
have used apt-get or Synaptic to update Quantal packages.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: update-manager 1:0.163
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.4.0-5.11-generic 3.4.0
Uname: Linux 3.4.0-5-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.2.3-0ubuntu3
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sun Jun 24 11:40:28 2012
DuplicateOf: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013490
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/update-manager
GsettingsChanges:
 
InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Alpha amd64 (20120528)
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python3.2mu
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python3.2 /usr/bin/update-manager --dist-upgrade
ProcCwd: /home/carl
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 TERM=unknown
PythonArgs: ['/usr/bin/update-manager', '--dist-upgrade']
SourcePackage: update-manager
Title: update-manager crashed with ImportError in 
/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeQuirks.py: No module 
named plugincore.manager
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups:

** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-crash quantal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017177

Title:
  update-manager crashed with ImportError in /usr/lib/python3/dist-
  packages/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeQuirks.py: No module named
  plugincore.manager

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1017177/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 1017177] Re: update-manager crashed with ImportError in /usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeQuirks.py: No module named plugincore.manager

2012-06-24 Thread cwsnyder
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1013490 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1013490

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1017177

Title:
  update-manager crashed with ImportError in /usr/lib/python3/dist-
  packages/DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeQuirks.py: No module named
  plugincore.manager

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/1017177/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 810721] Re: at-spi-registryd crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_get_default()

2011-11-19 Thread cwsnyder
Additional information which I noticed on my system:

I didn't notice in Ubuntu 10.10 or prior (back to 7.10), but 11.10
definitely complains that my BIOS is not setting the interrupts, and I
can see the screen where it complains after trying several times that my
EDID is not acceptable.

Don't know if this will help.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810721

Title:
  at-spi-registryd crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_get_default()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/at-spi/+bug/810721/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 810721] Re: at-spi-registryd crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_get_default()

2011-11-14 Thread cwsnyder
I finally fixed my problem on WUBI and separate 11.10 install partition by 
adding kernel options to GRUB, ie.
acpi=off noapic nomodeset

Apparently my rig suffers from a regression on ACPI handling and the ATI
Radeon Express 200 motherboard video, especially in the Linux Kernel 3.x
strain.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810721

Title:
  at-spi-registryd crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_get_default()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/at-spi/+bug/810721/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 810721] Re: at-spi-registryd crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_get_default()

2011-09-13 Thread cwsnyder
After kernel update from 3.0.0-10 to 3.0.0-11 on Xubuntu 11.10 beta, WUBI, same 
results as before, last 2 lines prior to freeze read:
[numbers] input: Power Button as /devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXPWRBN:00/input/input1
[numbers] ACPI: Power Button[PWRF]
Presently running 2.6.38-11-generic kernel, Xubuntu 11.10 beta, default 
composit, ATI Radeon Express 200 graphics from the motherboard.
Any other information available needed?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810721

Title:
  at-spi-registryd crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_get_default()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/at-spi/+bug/810721/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 810721] Re: at-spi-registryd crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_get_default()

2011-09-10 Thread cwsnyder
My system was running with the older kernel because I get a halt at the
point where the screen shows the power button is enabled running the 3.x
kernel, and I never get to login.  Running under Windows 7 32-bit WUBI,
Xubuntu Session, update from 11.04 installation done Friday.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810721

Title:
  at-spi-registryd crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_get_default()

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/at-spi/+bug/810721/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 756818] Re: Unity Live session nvidia display unuseable

2011-04-22 Thread cwsnyder
Following are my present .xsession-errors from the CD I created this
morning.  My display still blinks, but much slower, and my display comes
back to the same display.  It is usable.

[begin file]
/etc/gdm/Xsession: Beginning session setup...
Setting IM through im-switch for locale=en_US.
Start IM through /etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/all_ALL linked to 
/etc/X11/xinit/xinput.d/default.
GNOME_KEYRING_CONTROL=/tmp/keyring-jqIaNB
SSH_AUTH_SOCK=/tmp/keyring-jqIaNB/ssh
GNOME_KEYRING_PID=4786
GNOME_KEYRING_CONTROL=/tmp/keyring-jqIaNB
SSH_AUTH_SOCK=/tmp/keyring-jqIaNB/ssh
GNOME_KEYRING_CONTROL=/tmp/keyring-jqIaNB
SSH_AUTH_SOCK=/tmp/keyring-jqIaNB/ssh
Window manager warning: Type mismatch: Expected `int' got `bool' for key 
/apps/metacity/general/num_workspaces
Window manager warning: 0 stored in GConf key 
/apps/metacity/general/num_workspaces is out of range 1 to 36
Initializing nautilus-gdu extension

(nautilus:4813): GConf-CRITICAL **: gconf_value_free: assertion `value != NULL' 
failed
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/UpdateManager/SimpleGtkbuilderApp.py:35: 
GtkWarning: Ignoring the separator setting
  self.builder.add_from_file(path)
WARNING:root:timeout reached, exiting
** (process:4823): DEBUG: desktop-launch-listener.vala:118: ran with uri: 
file:///home/ubuntu

(nautilus:4813): GConf-CRITICAL **: gconf_value_free: assertion `value
!= NULL' failed

(nautilus:4813): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_value_get_object: assertion
`G_VALUE_HOLDS_OBJECT (value)' failed

(nautilus:4813): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_value_get_object: assertion
`G_VALUE_HOLDS_OBJECT (value)' failed

(nautilus:4813): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_value_get_object: assertion
`G_VALUE_HOLDS_OBJECT (value)' failed

(nautilus:4813): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_value_get_object: assertion
`G_VALUE_HOLDS_OBJECT (value)' failed

(nautilus:4813): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_value_get_object: assertion
`G_VALUE_HOLDS_OBJECT (value)' failed

(nautilus:4813): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_value_get_object: assertion
`G_VALUE_HOLDS_OBJECT (value)' failed

(nautilus:4813): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_value_get_object: assertion 
`G_VALUE_HOLDS_OBJECT (value)' failed
Nautilus-Share-Message: Called net usershare info but it failed: 'net 
usershare' returned error 255: net usershare: cannot open usershare directory 
/var/lib/samba/usershares. Error No such file or directory
Please ask your system administrator to enable user sharing.


(nautilus:4813): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_value_get_object: assertion 
`G_VALUE_HOLDS_OBJECT (value)' failed
** (process:4823): DEBUG: desktop-launch-listener.vala:118: ran with uri: 
file:///home/ubuntu/.xsession-errors
** (process:4823): DEBUG: zeitgeist-datahub.vala:174: Inserting 1 events
** (process:4823): DEBUG: zeitgeist-datahub.vala:174: Inserting 3 events
** (process:4823): DEBUG: zeitgeist-datahub.vala:174: Inserting 1 events
[end file]

Any more information which I can provide?  Operating with nVidia GeForce
6200.

Note: I tried with the option to load only free software and didn't have
this problem, either.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756818

Title:
  Unity Live session nvidia  display unuseable

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 756818] Re: Unity Live session nvidia display unuseable

2011-04-22 Thread cwsnyder
I forgot to add to my previous comment, the desktop default seems to be
GNOME, not Unity, for this download Live session.

When I go to a terminal session, I get a nouveau error: DDC responded,
but no EDID for VGA-1

As noted in my original report, my Etronix 1701B LCD display does not
respond with a valid EDID, which I have been using /etc/X11/xorg.conf or
xrandr to fix since Ubuntu 7.04.  The default 1024x768@60Hz display is a
valid mode for this monitor, which is 1280x1024.

Should I try to install Natty to a flash drive persistent image to fix
this?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/756818

Title:
  Unity Live session nvidia  display unuseable

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 413624] Re: jockey-gtk crashed with BackendCrashError in convert_dbus_exceptions()

2010-12-22 Thread cwsnyder
Happened on attempting to install Ubuntu 10.10 from the Linux Format
magazine DVD on an Acer Aspire One ZG5, external DVD from Lite-On
connected.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/413624

Title:
  jockey-gtk crashed with BackendCrashError in convert_dbus_exceptions()

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 555414] Re: package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10

2010-04-13 Thread cwsnyder
I finally went into a terminal and used 'apt-get remove' to remove all
of the error causing packages, one by one, then re-installed grub and
other packages as needed to restore functioning and updating.

As reported above, automatic re-configuring did not work.

My system seems to be functioning now, I will append data if needed
later.

Thank you for your help and consideration.

-- 
package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555414
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 555414] Re: package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10

2010-04-13 Thread cwsnyder
I finally went into a terminal and used 'apt-get remove' to remove all
of the error causing packages, one by one, then re-installed grub and
other packages as needed to restore functioning and updating.

As reported above, automatic re-configuring did not work.

My system seems to be functioning now, I will append data if needed
later.

Thank you for your help and consideration.

-- 
package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555414
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


Re: [Bug 555414] Re: package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10

2010-04-05 Thread cwsnyder
Attached find the terminal output from dpkg and the piped output file 
'error.txt'

I hope this tells you something.


** Attachment added: dpkg.out.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43197335/dpkg.out.txt

** Attachment added: error.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43197336/error.txt

-- 
package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555414
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


Re: [Bug 555414] Re: package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10

2010-04-05 Thread cwsnyder
Attached find the terminal output from dpkg and the piped output file 
'error.txt'

I hope this tells you something.


** Attachment added: dpkg.out.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43197335/dpkg.out.txt

** Attachment added: error.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43197336/error.txt

-- 
package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555414
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 555414] [NEW] package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10

2010-04-04 Thread cwsnyder
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: samba

Re-installation of Ubuntu 9.10 from LXFDVD127 after a Debian 5 re-
installation accidentally overwrote Ubuntu / (/home was a separate
partition and was not overwritten).  Three partitions, /, /home, and
swap, were the only partitions, sda1 (/ - ext4), sda2 (/home - ext3),
and sda6 (swap) are used for Ubuntu, Debian uses sda5 (/ - ext3), sda7
(/home - ext3) and sda6 (swap).

WinXP MC 2005 SP3 is installed on hda1, Win7 is installed on hda2.

Initial installation went without any hitches.  When installing
upgrades, samba-common, grub-pc, and two other packages which I reported
as failing with error 10, marked today as affecting me, failed on
installation scripts.

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Apr  4 19:19:22 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 10
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5)
Package: samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-20.58-generic
SourcePackage: samba
Title: package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-20-generic i686

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386

-- 
package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555414
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Server Team, which is subscribed to samba in ubuntu.

-- 
Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list
Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs


[Bug 555414] [NEW] package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10

2010-04-04 Thread cwsnyder
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: samba

Re-installation of Ubuntu 9.10 from LXFDVD127 after a Debian 5 re-
installation accidentally overwrote Ubuntu / (/home was a separate
partition and was not overwritten).  Three partitions, /, /home, and
swap, were the only partitions, sda1 (/ - ext4), sda2 (/home - ext3),
and sda6 (swap) are used for Ubuntu, Debian uses sda5 (/ - ext3), sda7
(/home - ext3) and sda6 (swap).

WinXP MC 2005 SP3 is installed on hda1, Win7 is installed on hda2.

Initial installation went without any hitches.  When installing
upgrades, samba-common, grub-pc, and two other packages which I reported
as failing with error 10, marked today as affecting me, failed on
installation scripts.

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
Date: Sun Apr  4 19:19:22 2010
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 10
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 9.10 Karmic Koala - Release i386 (20091028.5)
Package: samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.31-20.58-generic
SourcePackage: samba
Title: package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10
Uname: Linux 2.6.31-20-generic i686

** Affects: samba (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386

-- 
package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555414
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 555414] Re: package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10

2010-04-04 Thread cwsnyder

** Attachment added: AptOrdering.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43118171/AptOrdering.txt

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43118172/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: Dmesg.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43118173/Dmesg.txt

** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43118174/DpkgTerminalLog.gz

-- 
package samba-common 2:3.4.0-3ubuntu5.6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 10
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555414
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 414897] Re: [karmic] No sound with Realtek ALC883

2009-11-10 Thread cwsnyder
I finally copied the ~/.pulse folder from an alternate user I set up to
check if it was just the default user which had the problems with no
sound.  That fixed my problem, but I don't know why the alternate user
worked and the original (default) user did not.

-- 
[karmic] No sound with Realtek ALC883
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414897
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 414897] Re: [karmic] No sound with Realtek ALC883

2009-11-08 Thread cwsnyder
I had installed with only a single user besides root.  Using the guide
to sound problems on the Ubuntu Forums, I added a different user.  The
new user sound works on my system.  Now I just have to dig into what the
differences are between the users.

-- 
[karmic] No sound with Realtek ALC883
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414897
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 414897] Re: [karmic] No sound with Realtek ALC883

2009-11-08 Thread cwsnyder
@Daniel T Chen
I tried the   rm -rf ~/.pulse*
Still no sound.  System  Preferences  Sound does not detect any sound 
hardware with the default user.

sudo lshw for multimedia shows:
*-multimedia
 description: Audio device
 product: IXP SB4x0 High Definition Audio Controller
 vendor: ATI Technologies Inc
 physical id: 14.2
 bus info: p...@:00:14.2
 version: 01
 width: 64 bits
 clock: 33MHz
 capabilities: pm msi bus_master cap_list
 configuration: driver=HDA Intel latency=64
 resources: irq:16 memory:9210-92103fff
Is there any other information which I can provide with the aim of squashing 
this 'bug'?

-- 
[karmic] No sound with Realtek ALC883
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414897
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 414897] Re: [karmic] No sound with Realtek ALC883

2009-11-07 Thread cwsnyder
Running ALSA-Mixer from Terminal shows the Realtek ALC883 chip, HDA ATI
SB motherboard sound package, but I am unable to get _any_ sound from
Karmic.  Sound had worked since I started with Gutsy, although
PulseAudio since Intrepid had been problematical.  Going to try
disabling PulseAudio and going back to ALSA to see if that works.

-- 
[karmic] No sound with Realtek ALC883
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414897
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 414546] Re: gdebi-gtk crashed with DebError in compressed_part_name()

2009-08-16 Thread cwsnyder

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30401335/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30401336/ProcMaps.txt

** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30401337/ProcStatus.txt

** Attachment added: Traceback.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30401338/Traceback.txt

** Visibility changed to: Public

-- 
gdebi-gtk crashed with DebError in compressed_part_name()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414546
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 386770] [NEW] package lsb-base 3.2-20ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/etc/lsb-base-logging.sh', which is also in package splashy

2009-06-13 Thread cwsnyder
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: lsb

I was using  sudo apt-get update   followed by   sudo apt-get upgrade
in a terminal window when the crash occurred.

Ubuntu 9.04, Jaunty Jackalope.  I had a browser window open as well as
the terminal window.  The following is a copy of the attempted upgrade
results from the terminal window.

c...@cws-desktop:~$ sudo apt-get upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree   
Reading state information... Done
The following packages have been kept back:
  linux-headers-generic linux-image-generic linux-restricted-modules-generic
The following packages will be upgraded:
  chromium-browser firefox firefox-3.0 firefox-3.0-branding
  firefox-3.0-gnome-support firefox-gnome-support hal imagemagick
  imagemagick-doc libaprutil1 libhal-storage1 libhal1 libmagickcore1
  libmagickwand1 linux-libc-dev linux-restricted-modules-common lsb-base
  lsb-release tzdata xulrunner-1.9 xulrunner-1.9-gnome-support
21 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded.
Need to get 34.2MB of archives.
After this operation, 176kB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue [Y/n]? 
Get:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net jaunty/main chromium-browser 
3.0.189.0~svn20090612r18283-0ubuntu1~ucd2~jaunty [17.8MB]
Get:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-proposed/main lsb-base 
4.0-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 [24.4kB]
Get:3 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-proposed/main tzdata 
2009i-0ubuntu0.9.04 [694kB]
Get:4 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-proposed/main lsb-release 
4.0-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 [23.9kB]
Get:5 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main firefox-3.0-branding 
3.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 [202kB]
Get:6 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main 
xulrunner-1.9-gnome-support 1.9.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 [39.4kB]
Get:7 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main xulrunner-1.9 
1.9.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 [7549kB]
Get:8 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main 
firefox-3.0-gnome-support 3.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 [84.7kB]
Get:9 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main firefox-3.0 
3.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 [887kB]
Get:10 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main firefox 
3.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 [69.3kB]
Get:11 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main firefox-gnome-support 
3.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 [69.2kB]
Get:12 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-proposed/main libhal1 
0.5.12~rc1+git20090403-0ubuntu3 [93.5kB]
Get:13 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-proposed/main libhal-storage1 
0.5.12~rc1+git20090403-0ubuntu3 [22.7kB]
Get:14 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-proposed/main hal 
0.5.12~rc1+git20090403-0ubuntu3 [395kB]
Get:15 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main libmagickwand1 
7:6.4.5.4.dfsg1-1ubuntu3.1 [334kB]
Get:16 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main libmagickcore1 
7:6.4.5.4.dfsg1-1ubuntu3.1 [1654kB]
Get:17 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main imagemagick 
7:6.4.5.4.dfsg1-1ubuntu3.1 [86.9kB]
Get:18 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main imagemagick-doc 
7:6.4.5.4.dfsg1-1ubuntu3.1 [3243kB]
Get:19 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main libaprutil1 
1.2.12+dfsg-8ubuntu0.1 [72.4kB]
Get:20 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-proposed/main linux-libc-dev 
2.6.28-13.44 [760kB]
Get:21 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-proposed/restricted 
linux-restricted-modules-common 2.6.28-13.17 [11.3kB]
Fetched 34.2MB in 1min 32s (371kB/s)   
Preconfiguring packages ...
(Reading database ... 213306 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to replace lsb-base 3.2-20ubuntu4 (using 
.../lsb-base_4.0-0ubuntu0.9.04.1_all.deb) ...
Unpacking replacement lsb-base ...
dpkg: error processing 
/var/cache/apt/archives/lsb-base_4.0-0ubuntu0.9.04.1_all.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite `/etc/lsb-base-logging.sh', which is also in package 
splashy
Errors were encountered while processing:
 /var/cache/apt/archives/lsb-base_4.0-0ubuntu0.9.04.1_all.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
c...@cws-desktop:~$ 

Additional information needed?

ProblemType: Package
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite `/etc/lsb-base-logging.sh', which is also in 
package splashy
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Package: lsb-base 3.2-20ubuntu4
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: lsb
Title: package lsb-base 3.2-20ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to 
overwrite `/etc/lsb-base-logging.sh', which is also in package splashy
Uname: Linux 2.6.28-12-generic i686

** Affects: lsb (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-package i386

-- 
package lsb-base 3.2-20ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite 
`/etc/lsb-base-logging.sh', which is also in package splashy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386770
You received this bug notification because 

[Bug 386770] Re: package lsb-base 3.2-20ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/etc/lsb-base-logging.sh', which is also in package splashy

2009-06-13 Thread cwsnyder

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27875047/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: DpkgTerminalLog.gz
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/27875048/DpkgTerminalLog.gz

-- 
package lsb-base 3.2-20ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite 
`/etc/lsb-base-logging.sh', which is also in package splashy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/386770
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 386770] Re: package lsb-base 3.2-20ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite `/etc/lsb-base-logging.sh', which is also in package splashy

2009-06-13 Thread cwsnyder
** Description changed:

  Binary package hint: lsb
  
  I was using  sudo apt-get update   followed by   sudo apt-get upgrade
  in a terminal window when the crash occurred.
  
  Ubuntu 9.04, Jaunty Jackalope.  I had a browser window open as well as
  the terminal window.  The following is a copy of the attempted upgrade
  results from the terminal window.
  
  c...@cws-desktop:~$ sudo apt-get upgrade
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree   
  Reading state information... Done
  The following packages have been kept back:
linux-headers-generic linux-image-generic linux-restricted-modules-generic
  The following packages will be upgraded:
chromium-browser firefox firefox-3.0 firefox-3.0-branding
firefox-3.0-gnome-support firefox-gnome-support hal imagemagick
imagemagick-doc libaprutil1 libhal-storage1 libhal1 libmagickcore1
libmagickwand1 linux-libc-dev linux-restricted-modules-common lsb-base
lsb-release tzdata xulrunner-1.9 xulrunner-1.9-gnome-support
  21 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 3 not upgraded.
  Need to get 34.2MB of archives.
  After this operation, 176kB of additional disk space will be used.
  Do you want to continue [Y/n]? 
  Get:1 http://ppa.launchpad.net jaunty/main chromium-browser 
3.0.189.0~svn20090612r18283-0ubuntu1~ucd2~jaunty [17.8MB]
  Get:2 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-proposed/main lsb-base 
4.0-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 [24.4kB]
  Get:3 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-proposed/main tzdata 
2009i-0ubuntu0.9.04 [694kB]
  Get:4 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-proposed/main lsb-release 
4.0-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 [23.9kB]
  Get:5 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main firefox-3.0-branding 
3.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 [202kB]
  Get:6 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main 
xulrunner-1.9-gnome-support 1.9.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 [39.4kB]
  Get:7 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main xulrunner-1.9 
1.9.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 [7549kB]
  Get:8 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main 
firefox-3.0-gnome-support 3.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 [84.7kB]
  Get:9 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main firefox-3.0 
3.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 [887kB]
  Get:10 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main firefox 
3.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 [69.3kB]
  Get:11 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main firefox-gnome-support 
3.0.11+build2+nobinonly-0ubuntu0.9.04.1 [69.2kB]
  Get:12 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-proposed/main libhal1 
0.5.12~rc1+git20090403-0ubuntu3 [93.5kB]
  Get:13 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-proposed/main libhal-storage1 
0.5.12~rc1+git20090403-0ubuntu3 [22.7kB]
  Get:14 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-proposed/main hal 
0.5.12~rc1+git20090403-0ubuntu3 [395kB]
  Get:15 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main libmagickwand1 
7:6.4.5.4.dfsg1-1ubuntu3.1 [334kB]
  Get:16 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main libmagickcore1 
7:6.4.5.4.dfsg1-1ubuntu3.1 [1654kB]
  Get:17 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main imagemagick 
7:6.4.5.4.dfsg1-1ubuntu3.1 [86.9kB]
  Get:18 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main imagemagick-doc 
7:6.4.5.4.dfsg1-1ubuntu3.1 [3243kB]
  Get:19 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-updates/main libaprutil1 
1.2.12+dfsg-8ubuntu0.1 [72.4kB]
  Get:20 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-proposed/main linux-libc-dev 
2.6.28-13.44 [760kB]
  Get:21 http://us.archive.ubuntu.com jaunty-proposed/restricted 
linux-restricted-modules-common 2.6.28-13.17 [11.3kB]
  Fetched 34.2MB in 1min 32s (371kB/s)  
 
  Preconfiguring packages ...
  (Reading database ... 213306 files and directories currently installed.)
  Preparing to replace lsb-base 3.2-20ubuntu4 (using 
.../lsb-base_4.0-0ubuntu0.9.04.1_all.deb) ...
  Unpacking replacement lsb-base ...
  dpkg: error processing 
/var/cache/apt/archives/lsb-base_4.0-0ubuntu0.9.04.1_all.deb (--unpack):
   trying to overwrite `/etc/lsb-base-logging.sh', which is also in package 
splashy
  Errors were encountered while processing:
   /var/cache/apt/archives/lsb-base_4.0-0ubuntu0.9.04.1_all.deb
  E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
  c...@cws-desktop:~$ 
  
+ Note: Removed /etc/lsb-base-logging.sh and attempted to restart the
+ sudo apt-get upgrade   , but the same  error occurred.
+ 
  Additional information needed?
  
  ProblemType: Package
  Architecture: i386
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.04
  ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite `/etc/lsb-base-logging.sh', which is also 
in package splashy
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
  Package: lsb-base 3.2-20ubuntu4
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: lsb
  Title: package lsb-base 3.2-20ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: trying to 
overwrite `/etc/lsb-base-logging.sh', which is also in package splashy
  Uname: Linux 2.6.28-12-generic i686

-- 
package lsb-base 3.2-20ubuntu4 failed to 

[Bug 355119] Re: Ubuntu Jaunty Install--Screen mode does not fit display

2009-04-25 Thread cwsnyder
Fixed in release version of Ubuntu 9.04 Jaunty Jackalope.

** Changed in: live-installer (Ubuntu)
   Status: New = Fix Released

-- 
Ubuntu Jaunty Install--Screen mode does not fit display
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355119
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 355119] Re: Ubuntu Jaunty Install--Screen mode does not fit display

2009-04-20 Thread cwsnyder
** Description changed:

- Binary package hint: live-installer
+ Binary package hint: installer
  
  On my system, while attempting to install Ubuntu Jaunty Jackalope Beta
  (as of 4/1/2009), the display often had controls off the edge of the
  screen, without scrolling available.  The controls I needed to finish
  the installation were there, but abort options, etc. often only had half
  of the button and the sub-title off the screen, below or to the right.
  
  I have an nVidia 6200 processor board with an Etronix 1280x1024 monitor.
  I will list more information as requested, or full information on my
  display system is listed in an earlier bug report on X server.
+ 
+ Re-tried with the installer from the boot menu-- same problem.
+ Information  buttons for forward/backward are both off screen to the
+ right.

-- 
Ubuntu Jaunty Install--Screen mode does not fit display
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355119
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 293096] Re: nvidia Pentium D low graphics/unsupported modes

2009-04-04 Thread cwsnyder
Verified fixed in 180.44 in Ubuntu Jaunty Jackalope Beta.
Defaulted to 1024x...@60hz.
Note: My Etronix display is still not recognized, but I can at least get a 
usable display which doesn't go to an unrecognized mode.

** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-180 (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed = Fix Released

-- 
nvidia Pentium D low graphics/unsupported modes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293096
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 355119] [NEW] Ubuntu Jaunty Install--Screen mode does not fit display

2009-04-04 Thread cwsnyder
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: live-installer

On my system, while attempting to install Ubuntu Jaunty Jackalope Beta
(as of 4/1/2009), the display often had controls off the edge of the
screen, without scrolling available.  The controls I needed to finish
the installation were there, but abort options, etc. often only had half
of the button and the sub-title off the screen, below or to the right.

I have an nVidia 6200 processor board with an Etronix 1280x1024 monitor.
I will list more information as requested, or full information on my
display system is listed in an earlier bug report on X server.

** Affects: live-installer (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
Ubuntu Jaunty Install--Screen mode does not fit display
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355119
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 293096] [NEW] nvidia Pentium D low graphics/unsupported modes

2008-11-03 Thread cwsnyder
Public bug reported:

Binary package hint: xorg

Problem has persisted from at least 7.10 Gutsy through 8.10 Intrepid, Live CD 
or installed, restricted driver or open source.
When installing or upgrading Ubuntu, I am unable to get any screens to display 
at higher than 800x600 resolution without a custom xorg.conf file (see 
attached).  On occasion, display modes of 1650x something and/or refresh 
frequencies of 50 to 54Hz - which are undisplayable on my Etronix 1710B LCD 
monitor (1280x1024 max resolution) resulted from attempting to use the 
automatic settings.  At that point, I reboot with the Live CD, remove the 
revised settings and start again from fresh.

Once I have my custom xorg.conf file installed, as long as I don't
attempt to change the nVidia driver, my system has been stable and
usable.  Since this happened every time I have attempted to install or
upgrade Ubuntu since Dec. '07, I thought I should report it.  The same
problem affects Mandriva One 2008 Spring, Debian Lenny and Knoppix 5.1.1
and 5.3.1.  Many Live CD versions simply don't work on this machine
configuration.  I have a motherboard ATI graphics system, but was unable
to get ANY Linux system to work with both sound and graphics until I
installed a PCI express nVidia GeForce 6200 card and disabled the
motherboard system.

ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10
Package: xorg 1:7.4~5ubuntu3
ProcEnviron:
 
PATH=/home/username/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/games
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
ProcVersion: Linux version 2.6.27-4-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 
4.3.2 (Ubuntu 4.3.2-1ubuntu7) ) #1 SMP Wed Sep 24 01:30:51 UTC 2008

SourcePackage: xorg
Uname: Linux 2.6.27-4-generic i686
xkbcomp:

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug

-- 
nvidia Pentium D low graphics/unsupported modes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293096
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs


[Bug 293096] Re: nvidia Pentium D low graphics/unsupported modes

2008-11-03 Thread cwsnyder

** Attachment added: Custom xorg.conf file
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19283745/xorg.conf

** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19283746/Dependencies.txt

** Attachment added: LsMod.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19283747/LsMod.txt

** Attachment added: LsPci.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19283748/LsPci.txt

** Attachment added: XorgConf.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19283749/XorgConf.txt

** Attachment added: XorgLog.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19283750/XorgLog.txt

** Attachment added: XorgLogOld.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19283751/XorgLogOld.txt

** Attachment added: Xrandr.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19283753/Xrandr.txt

** Attachment added: setxkbmap.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19283754/setxkbmap.txt

** Attachment added: xdpyinfo.txt
   http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19283756/xdpyinfo.txt

-- 
nvidia Pentium D low graphics/unsupported modes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293096
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs