[Bug 1868417] [NEW] package python3-lib2to3 3.7.5~rc1-1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

[Manny]

Public bug reported:

i was updating the ubuntu 19.10 through the software and app update tool

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.10
Package: python3-lib2to3 3.7.5~rc1-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.3.0-42.34-generic 5.3.18
Uname: Linux 5.3.0-42-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu8
AptOrdering:
 python3-apport:amd64: Install
 apport-gtk:amd64: Install
 NULL: ConfigurePending
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Mar 21 06:42:59 2020
DuplicateSignature:
 package:python3-lib2to3:3.7.5~rc1-1
 Setting up apport-gtk (2.20.11-0ubuntu8.6) ...
 dpkg: error processing package python3-lib2to3 (--configure):
  package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should
ErrorMessage: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should  
reinstall it before attempting configuration
InstallationDate: Installed on 2020-03-20 (1 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017)
PackageArchitecture: all
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.7, Python 3.7.5rc1, python3-minimal, 3.7.5-1
PythonDetails: N/A
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.7ubuntu2
 apt  1.9.4
SourcePackage: python3-stdlib-extensions
Title: package python3-lib2to3 3.7.5~rc1-1 failed to install/upgrade: package 
is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should  reinstall it before attempting 
configuration
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: python3-stdlib-extensions (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package eoan

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868417

Title:
  package python3-lib2to3 3.7.5~rc1-1 failed to install/upgrade: package
  is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should  reinstall it before
  attempting configuration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-stdlib-extensions/+bug/1868417/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1766945] Re: (EFI on top of legacy install) choosing "replace" or "resize" options in partitioning may lead to an install failure

[Manny Parra]

shows grub2 installation failure...Xubuntu dual boot with windows
embedded system

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766945

Title:
  (EFI on top of legacy install) choosing "replace" or "resize" options
  in partitioning may lead to an install failure

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/partman-auto/+bug/1766945/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1753509] Re: avahi-daemon adds/installs every printer on network

[Manny Flores]

Did everyone just give up? I'm still trying to solve this and I have a thread 
going on over at MX Linux.
https://forum.mxlinux.org/viewtopic.php?f=108=51567

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753509

Title:
  avahi-daemon adds/installs every printer on network

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups-filters/+bug/1753509/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1769346] Re: Unable to install 18.04 server AMD64 with targeted kernel: initramfs-tools

[Manny Flores]

I fixed this error by updating my BIOS. Weird - I didn't have this issue
with prior versions including 16.04.4 but when I also tried 16.04.4, I
got the same problem. I might have been using an earlier 16.04.x where
this wasn't an issue. But again, in the end, the BIOS did the trick.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1769346

Title:
  Unable to install 18.04 server AMD64 with targeted kernel: initramfs-
  tools

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1769346/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1769346] Re: Unable to install 18.04 server AMD64 with targeted kernel: initramfs-tools

[Manny Flores]

Confirming that I get this same error on a fresh new install of 18.04
server. Not sure why there's a reference to i386 since this is a 64-bit
server installation.

error: file '/boot/grub/i386-pc/normal.mod' not found.
Entering rescue mode...
grub rescue>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1769346

Title:
  Unable to install 18.04 server AMD64 with targeted kernel: initramfs-
  tools

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/initramfs-tools/+bug/1769346/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1716707] Re: libreoffice writer crashes on start

[Manny Martines]

The same problem was reported by others:
https://askubuntu.com/questions/946624/libreoffice-writer-will-not-open
https://askubuntu.com/questions/927859/libreoffice-writer-crashes-on-start

The problem persists after I reinstalled libreoffice (remove, install,
update, autoremove,upgrade-full).

The lowriter command only displays the launch dialog. No error messages
are displayed.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716707

Title:
  libreoffice writer crashes on start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1716707/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1716707] [NEW] libreoffice writer crashes on start

[Manny Martines]

Public bug reported:

1) lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 17.04
Release:17.04

2) apt-cache policy libreoffice-writer
libreoffice-writer:
  Installed: 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2
  Candidate: 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2
  Version table:
 *** 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu zesty/main i386 Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

apt-show-versions -r libreoffice*
libreoffice:i386/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-avmedia-backend-gstreamer:i386/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-base:i386/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-base-core:i386/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-base-drivers:i386/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-calc:i386/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-common:all/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-core:i386/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-draw:i386/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-gnome:i386/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-gtk3:i386/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-impress:i386/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-java-common:all/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-librelogo:all/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-math:i386/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-nlpsolver:all/zesty 0.9+LibO5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-ogltrans:i386/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-pdfimport:i386/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-report-builder:all/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-report-builder-bin:i386/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-script-provider-bsh:all/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-script-provider-js:all/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-script-provider-python:all/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-sdbc-firebird:i386 not installed
libreoffice-sdbc-hsqldb:i386/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-sdbc-postgresql:i386/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-style-breeze:all/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-style-galaxy:all/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-style-tango:all/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-wiki-publisher:all/zesty 1.2.0+LibO5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate
libreoffice-writer:i386/zesty 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2 uptodate

3) What is expected to happen in Writer is .

Start libreoffice writer from:
- Desktop menu: Office => Libre Office Writer
- Filetype association: /.../anyfile.odf or /.../anyfile.doc
- from Libre suite => Libre Office Writer

The libreoffice writer initial dialog is displayed. 
After the dialog indicates "100% complete", the dialog closes. 
Then, the writer application opens a blank document or the selected document.

4) What happened instead is...

(All in step 3 above until: After the dialog indicates "100% complete", the 
dialog closes).
 
But, the writer crashes or fails to start.
The writer does not open.
There are no error messages or dialogs displayed.

The problem does not occur with the other libreoffice applications
(suite, base, calc, impress, math).

-Version-
Kernel  : Linux 4.10.0-33-generic (i686)
Compiled: #37-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 11 10:53:59 UTC 2017
C Library   : GNU C Library version (Ubuntu GLIBC 2.24-9ubuntu2.2) 
2.24 (unstable)
Default C Compiler  : GNU C Compiler version 6.3.0 20170406 (Ubuntu 
6.3.0-12ubuntu2) 
Distribution: Ubuntu 17.04
-Current Session-
Desktop Environment : LXDE (Lubuntu)

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
Package: libreoffice-writer 1:5.3.1-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-33.37-generic 4.10.17
Uname: Linux 4.10.0-33-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.20.4-0ubuntu4.5
Architecture: i386
CurrentDesktop: LXDE
Date: Tue Sep 12 11:02:21 2017
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-10-07 (339 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Lubuntu 14.04 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release i386 (20140416.2)
SourcePackage: libreoffice
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: libreoffice (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 zesty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1716707

Title:
  libreoffice writer crashes on start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libreoffice/+bug/1716707/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1696302] Status changed to Confirmed

[manny l]

so i do not need to update?
-manster

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Brad Figg 
wrote:

> This change was made by a bot.
>
> ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
>Status: New => Confirmed
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
> report.
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696302
>
> Title:
>   package linux-image-4.10.0-22-generic (not installed) failed to
>   install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error
>   exit status 128
>
> Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
>   Confirmed
>
> Bug description:
>   i was trying to update OS
>
>   ProblemType: Package
>   DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
>   Package: linux-image-4.10.0-22-generic (not installed)
>   ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-21.23-generic 4.10.11
>   Uname: Linux 4.10.0-21-generic x86_64
>   ApportVersion: 2.20.4-0ubuntu4.1
>   Architecture: amd64
>   AudioDevicesInUse:
>USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
>/dev/snd/controlC0:  manster1703 F pulseaudio
>   Date: Tue Jun  6 23:37:26 2017
>   ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit
> status 128
>   InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-05-29 (8 days ago)
>   InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.04 "Zesty Zapus" - Release amd64 (20170412)
>   MachineType: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. R430/P430/R480
>   ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb
>   ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.10.0-21-generic
> root=UUID=5dfda21a-15dd-4778-bd11-c69a828f08bd ro quiet splash
> vt.handoff=7
>   PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No
> PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
>   RelatedPackageVersions: grub-pc 2.02~beta3-4ubuntu2
>   SourcePackage: linux
>   Title: package linux-image-4.10.0-22-generic (not installed) failed to
> install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit
> status 128
>   UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
>   dmi.bios.date: 06/25/2010
>   dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies Ltd.
>   dmi.bios.version: 06NR.M004.20100625.LX
>   dmi.board.name: R430/P430/R480
>   dmi.board.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
>   dmi.board.version: Not Applicable
>   dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
>   dmi.chassis.type: 10
>   dmi.chassis.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
>   dmi.chassis.version: N/A
>   dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLtd.:bvr06NR.M004.20100625.LX:
> bd06/25/2010:svnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:pnR430/P430/R480:
> pvrNotApplicable:rvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:rnR430/P430/R480:
> rvrNotApplicable:cvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:ct10:cvrN/A:
>   dmi.product.name: R430/P430/R480
>   dmi.product.version: Not Applicable
>   dmi.sys.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
>
> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/
> 1696302/+subscriptions
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696302

Title:
  package linux-image-4.10.0-22-generic (not installed) failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error
  exit status 128

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1696302/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Re: [Bug 1696302] Status changed to Confirmed

[manny l]

i also got

package system is broken...

ps... i am a noob to linux in general

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 12:58 AM, Manny Lacsamana <djan...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> so i do not need to update?
> -manster
>
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 12:30 AM, Brad Figg <brad.f...@canonical.com>
> wrote:
>
>> This change was made by a bot.
>>
>> ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
>>Status: New => Confirmed
>>
>> --
>> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug
>> report.
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696302
>>
>> Title:
>>   package linux-image-4.10.0-22-generic (not installed) failed to
>>   install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error
>>   exit status 128
>>
>> Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
>>   Confirmed
>>
>> Bug description:
>>   i was trying to update OS
>>
>>   ProblemType: Package
>>   DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
>>   Package: linux-image-4.10.0-22-generic (not installed)
>>   ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-21.23-generic 4.10.11
>>   Uname: Linux 4.10.0-21-generic x86_64
>>   ApportVersion: 2.20.4-0ubuntu4.1
>>   Architecture: amd64
>>   AudioDevicesInUse:
>>USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
>>/dev/snd/controlC0:  manster1703 F pulseaudio
>>   Date: Tue Jun  6 23:37:26 2017
>>   ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error
>> exit status 128
>>   InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-05-29 (8 days ago)
>>   InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.04 "Zesty Zapus" - Release amd64 (20170412)
>>   MachineType: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. R430/P430/R480
>>   ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb
>>   ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.10.0-21-generic
>> root=UUID=5dfda21a-15dd-4778-bd11-c69a828f08bd ro quiet splash
>> vt.handoff=7
>>   PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No
>> PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
>>   RelatedPackageVersions: grub-pc 2.02~beta3-4ubuntu2
>>   SourcePackage: linux
>>   Title: package linux-image-4.10.0-22-generic (not installed) failed to
>> install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit
>> status 128
>>   UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
>>   dmi.bios.date: 06/25/2010
>>   dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies Ltd.
>>   dmi.bios.version: 06NR.M004.20100625.LX
>>   dmi.board.name: R430/P430/R480
>>   dmi.board.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
>>   dmi.board.version: Not Applicable
>>   dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
>>   dmi.chassis.type: 10
>>   dmi.chassis.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
>>   dmi.chassis.version: N/A
>>   dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLtd.
>> :bvr06NR.M004.20100625.LX:bd06/25/2010:svnSAMSUNGELECTRONICS
>> CO.,LTD.:pnR430/P430/R480:pvrNotApplicable:rvnSAMSUNGELECTRO
>> NICSCO.,LTD.:rnR430/P430/R480:rvrNotApplicable:cvnSAMSUNGELE
>> CTRONICSCO.,LTD.:ct10:cvrN/A:
>>   dmi.product.name: R430/P430/R480
>>   dmi.product.version: Not Applicable
>>   dmi.sys.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
>>
>> To manage notifications about this bug go to:
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1696302
>> /+subscriptions
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696302

Title:
  package linux-image-4.10.0-22-generic (not installed) failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error
  exit status 128

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1696302/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1696302] [NEW] package linux-image-4.10.0-22-generic (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 128

[manny l]

Public bug reported:

i was trying to update OS

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
Package: linux-image-4.10.0-22-generic (not installed)
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-21.23-generic 4.10.11
Uname: Linux 4.10.0-21-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.4-0ubuntu4.1
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  manster1703 F pulseaudio
Date: Tue Jun  6 23:37:26 2017
ErrorMessage: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit status 
128
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-05-29 (8 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.04 "Zesty Zapus" - Release amd64 (20170412)
MachineType: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. R430/P430/R480
ProcFB: 0 inteldrmfb
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.10.0-21-generic 
root=UUID=5dfda21a-15dd-4778-bd11-c69a828f08bd ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No 
PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
RelatedPackageVersions: grub-pc 2.02~beta3-4ubuntu2
SourcePackage: linux
Title: package linux-image-4.10.0-22-generic (not installed) failed to 
install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error exit 
status 128
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 06/25/2010
dmi.bios.vendor: Phoenix Technologies Ltd.
dmi.bios.version: 06NR.M004.20100625.LX
dmi.board.name: R430/P430/R480
dmi.board.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
dmi.board.version: Not Applicable
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
dmi.chassis.version: N/A
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnPhoenixTechnologiesLtd.:bvr06NR.M004.20100625.LX:bd06/25/2010:svnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:pnR430/P430/R480:pvrNotApplicable:rvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:rnR430/P430/R480:rvrNotApplicable:cvnSAMSUNGELECTRONICSCO.,LTD.:ct10:cvrN/A:
dmi.product.name: R430/P430/R480
dmi.product.version: Not Applicable
dmi.sys.vendor: SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.

** Affects: linux (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package zesty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1696302

Title:
  package linux-image-4.10.0-22-generic (not installed) failed to
  install/upgrade: subprocess new pre-installation script returned error
  exit status 128

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1696302/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1695134] [NEW] package gconf2-common 3.2.6-3ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 128

[manny l]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1688721 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1688721

Public bug reported:

tried to install comix

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
Package: gconf2-common 3.2.6-3ubuntu7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-21.23-generic 4.10.11
Uname: Linux 4.10.0-21-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.4-0ubuntu4.1
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Jun  1 21:26:08 2017
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 128
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-05-29 (3 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.04 "Zesty Zapus" - Release amd64 (20170412)
PackageArchitecture: all
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.18.10ubuntu2
 apt  1.4
SourcePackage: gconf
Title: package gconf2-common 3.2.6-3ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: 
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 128
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: gconf (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package zesty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1695134

Title:
  package gconf2-common 3.2.6-3ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade:
  subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
  status 128

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gconf/+bug/1695134/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1554615] [NEW] package libaudio2:amd64 1.9.4-1 failed to install/upgrade: package libaudio2:amd64 is already installed and configured

[Manny Ojeda]

Public bug reported:

i dont even know what this is

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: libaudio2:amd64 1.9.4-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.2.0-30.36~14.04.1-generic 4.2.8-ckt3
Uname: Linux 4.2.0-30-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.19
AptdaemonVersion: 1.1.1-1ubuntu5.2
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Mar  8 09:00:34 2016
DuplicateSignature: package:libaudio2:amd64:1.9.4-1:package libaudio2:amd64 is 
already installed and configured
ErrorMessage: package libaudio2:amd64 is already installed and configured
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-03-07 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Xubuntu 14.04.4 LTS "Trusty Tahr" - Release amd64 
(20160217.1)
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.17.5ubuntu5.5
 apt  1.0.1ubuntu2.11
SourcePackage: dpkg
Title: package libaudio2:amd64 1.9.4-1 failed to install/upgrade: package 
libaudio2:amd64 is already installed and configured
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: dpkg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: already-installed amd64 apport-package trusty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1554615

Title:
  package libaudio2:amd64 1.9.4-1 failed to install/upgrade: package
  libaudio2:amd64 is already installed and configured

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1554615/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1409166] Re: Popup dialog "could not set the configuration for CRTC 65" steals keyboard, hinders login in 3-monitor configuration

[Manny Kayy]

Can't add third monitor:
DBus.Error:org.gtk.GDBus.UnmappedGError.Quark._gnome_2drr_2derror_2dquark.Code2:
could not set the configuration for CRTC 65

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1409166

Title:
  Popup dialog "could not set the configuration for CRTC 65" steals
  keyboard, hinders login in 3-monitor configuration

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1409166/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1465105] [NEW] [To Be Filled By O.E.M., Realtek ALC662 rev1, Green Headphone Out, Front] Playback problem the headphones and mic none of the jack's rae detected when i plug something in i had to

[manny]

Public bug reported:

he headphones and mic none of the jack's rae detected when i plug
something in i had to use usb mic n headphones now those broke...i need
help

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.10
Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.16.0-23.31-generic 3.16.4
Uname: Linux 3.16.0-23-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.14.7-0ubuntu8
Architecture: amd64
AudioDevicesInUse:
 USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
 /dev/snd/controlC0:  manny  3927 F pulseaudio
 /dev/snd/controlC1:  manny  3927 F pulseaudio
CurrentDesktop: Unity
Date: Sun Jun 14 23:47:35 2015
InstallationDate: Installed on 2015-05-20 (26 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 14.10 Utopic Unicorn - Release amd64 (20141022.1)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: alsa-driver
Symptom: audio
Symptom_AlsaPlaybackTest: ALSA playback test through plughw:Generic successful
Symptom_Card: Built-in Audio - HD-Audio Generic
Symptom_Jack: Green Headphone Out, Front
Symptom_PulsePlaybackTest: PulseAudio playback test failed
Symptom_Type: None of the above
Title: [To Be Filled By O.E.M., Realtek ALC662 rev1, Green Headphone Out, 
Front] Playback problem
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 10/14/2013
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: P1.00
dmi.board.name: FM2A55M-VG3+
dmi.board.vendor: ASRock
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrP1.00:bd10/14/2013:svnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:pnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:pvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:rvnASRock:rnFM2A55M-VG3+:rvr:cvnToBeFilledByO.E.M.:ct3:cvrToBeFilledByO.E.M.:
dmi.product.name: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.product.version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.sys.vendor: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
mtime.conffile..etc.modprobe.d.alsa.base.conf: 2015-06-14T23:37:34.232881

** Affects: alsa-driver (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug utopic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1465105

Title:
  [To Be Filled By O.E.M., Realtek ALC662 rev1, Green Headphone Out,
  Front] Playback problem the headphones and mic none of the jack's rae
  detected when i plug something in i had to use usb mic n headphones
  now those broke...i need help

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/1465105/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1240595] Re: [regression] Unity Launcher Panel is gone after leaving full screen unredirected windows

[manny]

@Anirban Ghosh

 Agree.

quite annoying and makes the OS feels buggy/unpolish, have to recommend
linuxmint over ubuntu to friends.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1240595

Title:
  [regression] Unity Launcher  Panel is gone after leaving full screen
  unredirected windows

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/1240595/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1228360] Re: No clock in menu bar and can't edit Clock settings

[manny]

supposedly there was a fix released some weeks ago, but that didn't
help. same issue:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-
datetime/+bug/1239710

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1228360

Title:
  No clock in menu bar and can't edit Clock settings

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-datetime/+bug/1228360/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1239710] Re: indicator-datetime or -session missing ~10% of the time

[manny]

well this is still happening, there's no fix yet.

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indicator-
datetime/+bug/1228360

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1239710

Title:
  indicator-datetime or -session missing ~10% of the time

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/indicator-datetime/+bug/1239710/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1242907] Re: The Shutdown button does not work

[manny]

Yea I don't use cairo dock and have the problem.

Also when am on Ethernet (not using wifi), I suspend and when resume the
ethernet won't re-connect and the fancy shutdown dialog appears to stop
working.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242907

Title:
  The Shutdown button does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1242907/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1242907] Re: The Shutdown button does not work

[manny]

both upgrading and clean install computers of mine have this problem.

the new fancy transparent shutdown dialog don't work many times. Pretty
annoying regression.

other similar bugs or dups:


https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1244312

https://bugs.launchpad.net/cairo-dock-core/+bug/1242112

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1242907

Title:
  The Shutdown button does not work

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1242907/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1196051] Re: smart-scopes: Software center results do not show up in the home-scope

[manny]

If a person is really interested in getting something done, he will always 
find a route, but if he is not interested, he will always bring up an excuse.
-- Anonymous.

Suggested apps and recently used should be divided. Whomever coded it
like that clearly wasn't thinking long term and now is not compatible
with smart scopes and the home lens.

Apps are the main selling point of any OS, so they should always be
prioritized. The smart scopes was suppose to threat online results as
if they were local, so App results should be there.

the scopes were suppose to help a new consumer, not confuse them even
more.

I hope the same mistake doesn't get done into Unity 8.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196051

Title:
  smart-scopes: Software center results do not show up in the home-scope

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-scope-home/+bug/1196051/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1196051] Re: smart-scopes: Software center results do not show up in the home-scope

[manny]

** Description changed:

  No useful (or smart) search results returned for apps not currently
- installed, i.e. Steam, Gimp, etc. to the Home-Scope. However, the apps-
- scope already has this implemented.
+ installed, i.e. Steam, flash, Gimp, etc. to the Home-Scope.
  
  Fix needed: Add useful software center results also to the home-scope as
  per the goal to make the dash searches smart.
  
  ---
  
  original report:
  clean install of saucy, searched for chromium, banshee, etc. on either of 
these a Info icon for wikipedia is shown or chromium  bookmarks was shown but 
not the application itself.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196051

Title:
  smart-scopes: Software center results do not show up in the home-scope

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-scope-home/+bug/1196051/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1196051] Re: smart-scopes: Software center results do not show up in the home-scope

[manny]

Not trying to impose any opinions here.

The specs clearly state, what the rationale of the smart scopes project
is.

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SmartScopes1304Spec

The roadblock seems to be that the old stuff is kinda hard coded, so is
not such a trivial fix.

I never expected this to get done right away, but there's still a long
road ahead to make the smart scopes results as useful as it was
envisioned.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196051

Title:
  smart-scopes: Software center results do not show up in the home-scope

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-scope-home/+bug/1196051/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1196051] Re: smart-scopes: Software center results do not show up in the home-scope

[manny]

Even if you keep putting up excuses of an outdated design choice, you
will still need to find ways to fix all those irrelevant dash results.

Else the dumb-scopes is useless at is current stage.

Good luck!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196051

Title:
  smart-scopes: Software center results do not show up in the home-scope

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-scope-home/+bug/1196051/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1196051] Re: smart-scopes: Software center results do not show up in the home-scope

[manny]

** Package changed: unity (Ubuntu) = unity-scope-home (Ubuntu)

** Changed in: unity-scope-home (Ubuntu)
   Status: Invalid = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196051

Title:
  smart-scopes: Software center results do not show up in the home-scope

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-scope-home/+bug/1196051/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1196051] Re: smart-scopes: Software center results do not show up in the home-scope

[manny]

@Pawel Stolowski (stolowski)

Hi, I don't think you understood correctly.

This not about suggestions included in the home lens all the time.

The topic at hand is Search results. They are not smart because
they're not returning anything useful to the user when you type in
Steam, Gimp, chromium, etc.

Smart scopes right now is only returning A LOT of irrelevant stuff with
these searches, so, confusing more the user / consumer.

This totally goes against the spec:


https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SmartScopes1304Spec

Rationale
The driving factors behind the changes are the continual improvement of the 
Dash as a place for surfacing useful content, whether it’s local or remote, and 
a desire to take advantage of the amazing work done by contributors in building 
up a large amount of Scopes for the Dash.

The features break down as:

Ability for the Home Master Scope to show a mixture of ranked results from the:
default scopes
some of the installed scopes
remote scopes (scopes run on the server)
The Dash gathering and posting metrics to the Smart Scopes Service, so we can 
produce better results for queries.
The Smart Scopes Service being able to give ranked list of Scopes to present to 
the user.
The goal of the 100 Scopes project and of Ubuntu in general is to provide lots 
and lots of scopes, and there should be lots and lots more in the future for 
every data source that anyone might want. These scopes should all be in Ubuntu 
and ready to surface appropriate content in the Dash. The Ubuntu experience 
would be compromised if all those scopes were running all the time, though; the 
goal of the Smart Scopes project is to intelligently decide, for a given query, 
which scopes are likely to be most relevant to that query so that those scopes 
can be chosen to be started and return results. Users can of course explicitly 
choose scopes that they want used in the query to override the suggestions from 
the Smart Scopes service.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196051

Title:
  smart-scopes: Software center results do not show up in the home-scope

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-scope-home/+bug/1196051/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1196051] Re: smart-scopes: Software center results do not show up in the home-scope

[manny]

** Summary changed:

- smart scope does not return uninstalled suggestions
+ smart-scopes: Software center results do not show up in the home-scope

** Also affects: unity-scope-home
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196051

Title:
  smart-scopes: Software center results do not show up in the home-scope

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-scope-home/+bug/1196051/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1196051] Re: smart-scopes: Software center results do not show up in the home-scope

[manny]

** Description changed:

- clean install of saucy, searched for chromium or banshee, on either of
- these a Info icon for wikipedia is shown or chromium  bookmarks was
- shown but not the application itself.
+ No useful (or smart) search results returned for apps not currently
+ installed, i.e. Steam, Gimp, etc. to the Home-Scope. However, the apps-
+ scope already has this implemented.
+ 
+ Fix needed: Add useful software center results also to the home-scope as
+ per the goal to make the dash searches smart.
+ 
+ ---
+ 
+ original report:
+ clean install of saucy, searched for chromium, banshee, etc. on either of 
these a Info icon for wikipedia is shown or chromium  bookmarks was shown but 
not the application itself.
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
  Package: unity 7.0.0daily13.06.24-0ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.9.0-6.13-generic 3.9.6
  Uname: Linux 3.9.0-6-generic x86_64
  .tmp.unity.support.test.0:
-  
+ 
  ApportVersion: 2.10.2-0ubuntu3
  Architecture: amd64
  CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
  CompositorRunning: compiz
  CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0'
  CompositorUnredirectFSW: true
  Date: Sat Jun 29 15:44:21 2013
  DistUpgraded: Fresh install
  DistroCodename: saucy
  DistroVariant: ubuntu
  GraphicsCard:
-  Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller [8086:0166] 
(rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
-Subsystem: Lenovo Device [17aa:21f9]
+  Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller [8086:0166] 
(rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
+    Subsystem: Lenovo Device [17aa:21f9]
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-06-29 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.10 Saucy Salamander - Alpha amd64 (20130621)
  MachineType: LENOVO 34607ZG
  MarkForUpload: True
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.9.0-6-generic 
root=UUID=47f1fb81-ef7a-4ef4-b484-c63e8033ac26 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
  SourcePackage: unity
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 12/26/2012
  dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.bios.version: G6ET90WW (2.50 )
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available
  dmi.board.name: 34607ZG
  dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.board.version: Win8 Pro DPK TPG
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
  dmi.chassis.type: 10
  dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
  dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrG6ET90WW(2.50):bd12/26/2012:svnLENOVO:pn34607ZG:pvrThinkPadX1Carbon:rvnLENOVO:rn34607ZG:rvrWin8ProDPKTPG:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
  dmi.product.name: 34607ZG
  dmi.product.version: ThinkPad X1 Carbon
  dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
  version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.9~daily13.04.18.1~13.04-0ubuntu1
  version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A
  version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.45-2ubuntu1
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 9.1.3-0ubuntu4
  version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
  version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 9.1.3-0ubuntu4
  version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.13.3-0ubuntu13
  version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.7.3-0ubuntu2b2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:7.1.0-0ubuntu2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.21.9-0ubuntu2
  version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 
1:1.0.8-0ubuntu1
  xserver.bootTime: Sat Jun 29 14:32:45 2013
  xserver.configfile: default
  xserver.errors:
-  
+ 
  xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
  xserver.version: 2:1.13.3-0ubuntu13
  xserver.video_driver: intel

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196051

Title:
  smart-scopes: Software center results do not show up in the home-scope

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-scope-home/+bug/1196051/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1196051] Re: smart-scopes: Software center results do not show up in the home-scope

[manny]

** Description changed:

  No useful (or smart) search results returned for apps not currently
  installed, i.e. Steam, Gimp, etc. to the Home-Scope. However, the apps-
  scope already has this implemented.
  
  Fix needed: Add useful software center results also to the home-scope as
  per the goal to make the dash searches smart.
  
  ---
  
  original report:
  clean install of saucy, searched for chromium, banshee, etc. on either of 
these a Info icon for wikipedia is shown or chromium  bookmarks was shown but 
not the application itself.
- 
- ProblemType: Bug
- DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.10
- Package: unity 7.0.0daily13.06.24-0ubuntu2
- ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.9.0-6.13-generic 3.9.6
- Uname: Linux 3.9.0-6-generic x86_64
- .tmp.unity.support.test.0:
- 
- ApportVersion: 2.10.2-0ubuntu3
- Architecture: amd64
- CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
- CompositorRunning: compiz
- CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0'
- CompositorUnredirectFSW: true
- Date: Sat Jun 29 15:44:21 2013
- DistUpgraded: Fresh install
- DistroCodename: saucy
- DistroVariant: ubuntu
- GraphicsCard:
-  Intel Corporation 3rd Gen Core processor Graphics Controller [8086:0166] 
(rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
-    Subsystem: Lenovo Device [17aa:21f9]
- InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-06-29 (0 days ago)
- InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.10 Saucy Salamander - Alpha amd64 (20130621)
- MachineType: LENOVO 34607ZG
- MarkForUpload: True
- ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.9.0-6-generic 
root=UUID=47f1fb81-ef7a-4ef4-b484-c63e8033ac26 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
- SourcePackage: unity
- UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
- dmi.bios.date: 12/26/2012
- dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
- dmi.bios.version: G6ET90WW (2.50 )
- dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available
- dmi.board.name: 34607ZG
- dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
- dmi.board.version: Win8 Pro DPK TPG
- dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
- dmi.chassis.type: 10
- dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
- dmi.chassis.version: Not Available
- dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrG6ET90WW(2.50):bd12/26/2012:svnLENOVO:pn34607ZG:pvrThinkPadX1Carbon:rvnLENOVO:rn34607ZG:rvrWin8ProDPKTPG:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNotAvailable:
- dmi.product.name: 34607ZG
- dmi.product.version: ThinkPad X1 Carbon
- dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
- version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.9~daily13.04.18.1~13.04-0ubuntu1
- version.ia32-libs: ia32-libs N/A
- version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.45-2ubuntu1
- version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 9.1.3-0ubuntu4
- version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
- version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 9.1.3-0ubuntu4
- version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.13.3-0ubuntu13
- version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.7.3-0ubuntu2b2
- version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:7.1.0-0ubuntu2
- version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.21.9-0ubuntu2
- version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 
1:1.0.8-0ubuntu1
- xserver.bootTime: Sat Jun 29 14:32:45 2013
- xserver.configfile: default
- xserver.errors:
- 
- xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
- xserver.version: 2:1.13.3-0ubuntu13
- xserver.video_driver: intel

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1196051

Title:
  smart-scopes: Software center results do not show up in the home-scope

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-scope-home/+bug/1196051/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1222602] Re: [gen3] Bad performance on GMA950 and GMA3150

[manny]

I have this problem, but I've also seen the UI freezing or locking up
(most of the time) when you minimize applications. If you press Alt +
Ctrl + Del and get the shutdown diag, it goes back to normal.

I wonder if it's part of the same bug or a different one?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1222602

Title:
  [gen3] Bad performance on GMA950 and GMA3150

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mesa/+bug/1222602/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1222602] Re: [gen3] Bad performance on GMA950 and GMA3150

[manny]

@Colin Law

Ok, thanks.

I was able to confirm the lockups happening also on an AMD/ATI laptop.

However, I get much more lockups on the Intel.

So anyone else experienced this or reported it? Else I'll go my way and
report this soon.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1222602

Title:
  [gen3] Bad performance on GMA950 and GMA3150

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mesa/+bug/1222602/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1203178] [NEW] Grub loader failed on a Windows 8 system - Install could not load bootloader

[Manny Fernandez]

Public bug reported:

Grub could not install a bootloader during Install of amd64 version of
Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS 64bit. Did not attempt it on other partitions (am not
sure that I could). Install ended. Was issued a warning that my system
may not boot. Am a novice with respect to Linux/Ubuntu.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: ubiquity 2.10.24
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-23.35~precise1-generic 3.5.7.2
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-23-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu17.1
Architecture: amd64
CasperVersion: 1.315.1
Date: Fri Jul 19 16:17:34 2013
InstallCmdLine: initrd=/casper/initrd.lz file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed 
boot=casper only-ubiquity  quiet splash -- BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz.efi
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 (20130213)
MarkForUpload: True
ProcEnviron:
 TERM=linux
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SourcePackage: grub-installer
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: grub-installer (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug precise ubiquity-2.10.24

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1203178

Title:
  Grub loader failed on a Windows 8 system - Install could not load
  bootloader

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub-installer/+bug/1203178/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 49579] Re: screen doesn't lock when some menu is open

[manny]

@Anders Kaseorg

you can see the explanation (and more) on this article:

The Wayland Situation: Facts About X vs. Wayland.

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=articleitem=x_wayland_situationnum=1

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49579

Title:
  screen doesn't lock when some menu is open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-screensaver/+bug/49579/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 49579] Re: screen doesn't lock when some menu is open

[manny]

@HerbCSO

Actually I think they might be working on a fix to this indirectly with
Mir, just like wayland is trying to do.

So maybe this bug (or a new bug) should get attached to Mir so they
don't forget to test it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49579

Title:
  screen doesn't lock when some menu is open

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-screensaver/+bug/49579/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1087534] Re: [regression] Corrupted blurred overlays

[manny]

@Mark

sorry, but I can't see the file. What extension is it?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087534

Title:
  [regression] Corrupted blurred overlays

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nux/+bug/1087534/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1165902] Re: No blur in Unity on intel Hardware (dash, alt-tab, shutdown diags , etc.)

[manny]

shutdown diag no blur

** Attachment added: no-blur-shutdowndiag-intel-hw.png
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1165902/+attachment/3629478/+files/no-blur-shutdowndiag-intel-hw.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165902

Title:
  No blur in Unity on intel Hardware (dash, alt-tab, shutdown diags ,
  etc.)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1165902/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1165902] [NEW] No blur in Unity on intel Hardware (dash, alt-tab, shutdown diags , etc.)

[manny]

Public bug reported:

No blur or blur problem in Unity on intel Hardware (dash, alt-tab,
shutdown diags , etc.)

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 13.04
Package: xorg 1:7.7+1ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.8.0-16.26-generic 3.8.5
Uname: Linux 3.8.0-16-generic i686
.tmp.unity.support.test.0:
 
ApportVersion: 2.9.2-0ubuntu5
Architecture: i386
CompizPlugins: No value set for 
`/apps/compiz-1/general/screen0/options/active_plugins'
CompositorRunning: compiz
CompositorUnredirectDriverBlacklist: '(nouveau|Intel).*Mesa 8.0'
CompositorUnredirectFSW: true
Date: Sun Apr  7 17:51:31 2013
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: raring
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, if not too technical
GraphicsCard:
 Intel Corporation 82G33/G31 Express Integrated Graphics Controller [8086:29c2] 
(rev 10) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
   Subsystem: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. Device [1462:7529]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-04-06 (1 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.04 Raring Ringtail - Alpha i386 (20130402.1)
Lsusb:
 Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
 Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
 Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
MachineType: MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD MS-7529
MarkForUpload: True
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.8.0-16-generic 
root=UUID=3f94a10f-d070-43b9-b4be-7ccb35439ac3 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 10/20/2008
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: V2.2
dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: MS-7529
dmi.board.vendor: MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD
dmi.board.version: 1.0
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD
dmi.chassis.version: 1.0
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrV2.2:bd10/20/2008:svnMICRO-STARINTERNATIONALCO.,LTD:pnMS-7529:pvr1.0:rvnMICRO-STARINTERNATIONALCO.,LTD:rnMS-7529:rvr1.0:cvnMICRO-STARINTERNATIONALCO.,LTD:ct3:cvr1.0:
dmi.product.name: MS-7529
dmi.product.version: 1.0
dmi.sys.vendor: MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD
version.compiz: compiz 1:0.9.9~daily13.04.05-0ubuntu1
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.43-0ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 9.0.3-0ubuntu1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental: libgl1-mesa-dri-experimental N/A
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx 9.0.3-0ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:1.13.3-0ubuntu4
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev 1:2.7.3-0ubuntu2b2
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:7.1.0-0ubuntu2
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel 2:2.21.5-0ubuntu1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.7-0ubuntu1
xserver.bootTime: Sun Apr  7 17:45:27 2013
xserver.configfile: default
xserver.devices:
 inputPower Button KEYBOARD, id 6
 inputPower Button KEYBOARD, id 7
 inputAT Translated Set 2 keyboard KEYBOARD, id 8
 inputImPS/2 Generic Wheel Mouse MOUSE, id 9
xserver.errors:
 
xserver.logfile: /var/log/Xorg.0.log
xserver.version: 2:1.13.3-0ubuntu4
xserver.video_driver: intel

** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug compiz-0.9 i386 raring ubuntu

** Attachment added: no-blur-intel-hw1.png
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165902/+attachment/3629454/+files/no-blur-intel-hw1.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165902

Title:
  No blur in Unity on intel Hardware (dash, alt-tab, shutdown diags ,
  etc.)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1165902/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1165902] Re: No blur in Unity on intel Hardware (dash, alt-tab, shutdown diags , etc.)

[manny]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1087534 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087534

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1087534
   [regression] Corrupted blurred overlays

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1165902

Title:
  No blur in Unity on intel Hardware (dash, alt-tab, shutdown diags ,
  etc.)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1165902/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1087534] Re: [regression] Corrupted blurred overlays

[manny]

same here on a tower pc. bug #1165902

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1087534

Title:
  [regression] Corrupted blurred overlays

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/nux/+bug/1087534/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1107866] Re: Show window list when right clicking an icon in launcher - enables quick window switching

[manny]

nice! I saw this feature like a year ago by another developer:

http://www.webupd8.org/2012/06/unity-window-quicklists-switch-
between.html

There also seems to be a patch for truncating the titles (in the
comments).

will definitely improve the workflow.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1107866

Title:
  Show window list when right clicking an icon in launcher - enables
  quick window switching

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/1107866/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 578045] Re: Upgrading packaged Ubuntu application unreasonably involves upgrading entire OS

[manny]

well good news that they might ditch the point releases for a rolling or
semi-rolling model:

http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_itempx=MTI4MjE


sounds very much like they could do it like chakra does: 
http://chakra-linux.org/wiki/index.php/Half-Rolling_Release_Model

or post prior to this one.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578045

Title:
  Upgrading packaged Ubuntu application unreasonably involves upgrading
  entire OS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/578045/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 682788] Re: Improve Unity menus

[manny]

Woo there Kenny !! don't go bunkers! they are working on that and should
land soon. :)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682788

Title:
  Improve Unity menus

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/682788/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 713423] Re: [FFe/UIFe] Unity launcher gets cluttered when having multiple partitions and/or external volumes attached

[manny]

A type of Drawer, might also be another solution for this. i.e. :

http://www.iloveubuntu.net/create-bundles-files-and-folders-unity-
launcher-fancy-drawers-ppa-available

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/713423

Title:
  [FFe/UIFe] Unity launcher gets cluttered when having multiple
  partitions and/or external volumes attached

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/713423/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 578045] Re: Upgrading packaged Ubuntu application unreasonably involves upgrading entire OS

[manny]

YaY!

finally more concrete progress !!

http://www.iloveubuntu.net/ubuntu-developers-published-new-automatic-
third-party-app-uploading-process-ubuntu-software-center

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578045

Title:
  Upgrading packaged Ubuntu application unreasonably involves upgrading
  entire OS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-center/+bug/578045/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 985675] Re: Launcher: Improved accordion effect behavior by prioritizing running applications.

[manny]

Nice!

I will help promote this now that is accepting patches (sorry can't code
myself ;/).

Would be also helpful if it also gets tagged or added to a proposals
list that is open for contributions/patches. That way potential
contributors can find things to get their hands dirty with.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/985675

Title:
  Launcher: Improved accordion effect behavior by prioritizing running
  applications.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/985675/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1035437] Re: Can not install 12.10 Alpha3 because of Graphic problem

[manny]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1035737 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035737

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1035737
Can not install 12.10 Alpha3 because of Graphic problem

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035437

Title:
  Can not install 12.10 Alpha3 because of Graphic problem

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1035437/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1035437] Re: Can not install 12.10 Alpha3 because of Graphic problem

[manny]

** Tags removed: amd64 apport-bug corruption precise running-unity ubuntu
** Tags added: quantal

** Description changed:

  When installing or just running the live OS 12.10 Alpha 3 Screen is
  corrupt. See attached file.
- 
- ProblemType: Bug
- DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
- Package: xorg 1:7.6+12ubuntu1
- ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic 3.2.24
- Uname: Linux 3.2.0-29-generic x86_64
- ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu12
- Architecture: amd64
- Date: Fri Aug 10 13:59:18 2012
- DistroCodename: precise
- DistroVariant: ubuntu
- InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 
(20120425)
- ProcEnviron:
-  TERM=xterm
-  PATH=(custom, no user)
-  LANG=en_US.UTF-8
-  SHELL=/bin/bash
- SourcePackage: xorg
- Symptom: display
- UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1035437

Title:
  Can not install 12.10 Alpha3 because of Graphic problem

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1035437/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1032611] [NEW] Installation of 12.10 did NOT complete - no failure details displayed to user.

[Manny Fernandez]

Public bug reported:

Started install from a USB Flash. Installed Ubuntu installation to it
using NetBootin on the Windows side (latest download - checked that
before proceeding). Selected the daily distribution (instead of 12.04 -
which does not run on my laptop - the destination system). Subject
computer is a Dell D810 laptop with 2G installed and a 320G HD split 2/3
to Windows XP and 1/3 to Linux (including the swap space - 5G). Note:
the Windows XP installation was first with drive pre-partitioned for
Linux and Windows ahead of time (using gparted). Also created the
standard Dell diagnostic partition prior to installation of operating
system(s). FYI.

Reading instructions regarding requested files: Not familiar with
available options inside installer to complete these instructions.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: ubiquity 2.11.18
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-6.6-generic 3.5.0
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-6-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.4-0ubuntu6
Architecture: i386
CasperVersion: 1.320
Date: Fri Aug  3 08:11:36 2012
InstallCmdLine: initrd=/casper/initrd.lz file=/cdrom/preseed/ubuntu.seed 
boot=casper only-ubiquity  quiet splash -- BOOT_IMAGE=/casper/vmlinuz
LiveMediaBuild: Ubuntu 12.10 Quantal Quetzal - Alpha i386 (20120729.1)
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US.UTF-8
 TERM=linux
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SourcePackage: ubiquity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: ubuntu
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 quantal ubiquity-2.11.18

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032611

Title:
  Installation of 12.10 did NOT complete - no failure details displayed
  to user.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1032611/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1032611] Re: Installation of 12.10 did NOT complete - no failure details displayed to user.

[Manny Fernandez]

** Attachment added: syslog file
   https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032611/+attachment/3246722/+files/partman

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032611

Title:
  Installation of 12.10 did NOT complete - no failure details displayed
  to user.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1032611/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1006145] Re: Logitech Mouse not recognised on boot in 12.04

[Manny Fernandez]

@Oost: Hello. Thanks, but issue is not corrected. Did the fix as
directed and rebooted; mouse and keyboard were inoperative until I
unplugged and re-connected the Logitech dongle. Caveat: only tried it
once, however, the fault does not occur 100% of the time but about 50%
to 75% of boot iterations (before your suggested fix). I will keep the
fix in and see if frequency changes. Note here: I am knowledgeable
enough to be dangerous, but am not a systems programmer or a Linux guru.
I mess with operating systems (sort of). Thanks again.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006145

Title:
  Logitech Mouse not recognised on boot in 12.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1006145/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 1006145] Re: Logitech Mouse not recognised on boot in 12.04

[Manny Fernandez]

Hello,
Have a Logitech mk550 wireless combo mouse/keyboard. Works with BIOS and 
bootup and Windows. About 50-75% of the time have to remove and reconnect 
dongle to get keyboard and mouse at ubuntu boot 12.04.

Have a Dell Vostro 400 with an Intel processor.

Please advise if you require more information.

mfern...@twcny.rr.com

Thanks.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006145

Title:
  Logitech Mouse not recognised on boot in 12.04

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/1006145/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 876146] Re: Upgrading Ubuntu is risky (unusable or unbootable PC). What can be done to safeguard data, revert failed upgrades and overall reduce the risks?

[manny]

** Description changed:

  Please note: This bug report will now be used to track specific code
  changes for reducing the risk of upgrading (see comment #14). Please
  stay on topic. We also have enough cases of problematic upgrades. Thank
  You.
  
  *Report:
  
  ===References:
  
  - Typical bad upgrade user case (forum post):
  http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1860359
  
  - Unusable upgrade pic (unbootable)
  http://ubuntuforums.org/attachment.php?attachmentid=204320d=1318627364
  
  - [ubuntu] Thread for failed upgrades (huge list within 24 to 48 hours)
  http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1858475
  
- - Unofficial poll, but might serve useful as another source of data and user 
cases. Also, reference for future polls. Current sample of about 3k users, ~22% 
needed to reinstall.
+ - Unofficial poll, but might serve useful as another source of data and
+ user cases. Also, reference for future polls. Current sample of about 6k
+ users, ~22% needed to reinstall.
+ 
+ 
http://www.reddit.com/r/Ubuntu/comments/lm036/how_well_did_your_ubuntu_1110_upgrade_go/
+ 
+ 11.04 to 11.10 (26% failed.):
  http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/10/how-well-did-your-ubuntu-11-10-upgrade-go/
- 
http://www.reddit.com/r/Ubuntu/comments/lm036/how_well_did_your_ubuntu_1110_upgrade_go/
+ 
+ 11.10 to 12.04 LTS (18% failed, about ~8% improvement):
+ 
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/05/how-will-did-your-ubuntu-12-04-upgrade-go-poll/
+ 
  
  ===Description:
  
  Lots of angry users with broken computers that need rescue...
  
  The friendly Upgrade popup has become a mouse trap for new and
  unsuspecting users.
  
  Warnings and fail-safe alternatives and/or advise should be offered.
  Specially for users who cant risk having their computers broken (only
  have 1 OS). Nor have the knowledge, will, time and patience to fix
  something like this.
  
  I think this should be Critical for Precise pangolin as the number of
  users upgrading will be in the Tens if not hundreds of thousands (or
  millions...), since this will be the new LTS.
  
  ===Initial proposal:
  
  See comment #10:
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/876146/comments/10
  
  ===Other related helpers for the upgrade problem:
  
  -There is no feedback and reporting tool to count the number of bad
  upgrades and their related causes. Users should be able to give
  immediate feedback after every upgrade (successful or not). Ubuntu-bug
  upgrade-report on startup after an upgrade and a section on launchpad
  or dedicated site.
  
  -Update/upgrade manager should offer an auto-backup wizard to safe guard
  important user files to another partition, external storage or online
  (See comment #10).
  
  -Also separate branches for testing and a better release process/cycle would 
certainly help diminish the amount of bugs and many upgrade problems as it has 
been discussed here:
  http://netsplit.com/2011/09/08/new-ubuntu-release-process/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876146

Title:
  Upgrading Ubuntu is risky (unusable or unbootable PC). What can be
  done to safeguard data, revert failed upgrades and overall reduce the
  risks?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/876146/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 818170] Re: Option that open applications should be sorted

[manny]

this might be a better alternative for the issue described:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/985675

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/818170

Title:
  Option that open applications should be sorted

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/818170/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 973181] Re: System commands presence confuse the definition of App

[manny]

agree should not appear in the apps lens.

but in searches and/or hud is useful.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/973181

Title:
  System commands presence confuse the definition of App

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/hundredpapercuts/+bug/973181/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 930148] Re: Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only on maximised apps ?

[manny]

http://www.webupd8.org/2012/03/get-dodge-windows-unity-autohide.html

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/930148

Title:
  Dodge windows is down but what about making the launcher autohide only
  on maximised apps ?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/930148/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 965328] Re: Change label of 'set up broadcast account'

[manny]

** Also affects: indicator-messages (Ubuntu)
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Also affects: indicator-messages
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965328

Title:
  Change label of 'set up broadcast account'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/indicator-messages/+bug/965328/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 965328] Re: Change label of 'set up broadcast account'

[manny]

Add extra info, also messaging menu (indicator-messages)

** Description changed:

  The option for setting up accounts like facebook is disturbing. The term 
broadcast account is not clear for new user.
  We should replace 'broadcast' with 'social network'
+ 
+ 
+ 
+ This was pointed out in a Canonical's user study about the top
+ showstoppers for new users:
+ 
+ http://design.canonical.com/2010/06/when-new-users-first-encounter-
+ ubuntu-5-show-stoppers/
+ 
+ 3. Use of jargon
+ 
+ During their exploration of Ubuntu, participants encountered words they
+ didn’t know, or didn’t expect, or terms that they had no use for:
+ examples included ‘Gwibber’,’broadcast’,’terminal’ and ‘server’. “You
+ lose me with ‘terminal’ and ‘server’.” one person said.
+ 
+ The use of such specialised language significantly influenced how users
+ perceived the brand and the intended audience for Ubuntu. Some of the
+ participants wondered whether Ubuntu was meant really for expert users
+ rather than for them.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/965328

Title:
  Change label of 'set up broadcast account'

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/indicator-messages/+bug/965328/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 962265] Re: Unity in 12.04 is impossible to use by a newbie because of the empty Dash at start

[manny]

@cont3mpo

i like the home lens, files are also important, the issue is that its
empty at start so user has no idea what it does.

- it could show some apps by default and have a permanent icon more
apps at the end of the row, that switches to apps lens.

-permanent icon more files at the end of the row switches to files
lens.

-permanent downloads folder icon at the end of the row to open downloads
in nautilus.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/962265

Title:
  Unity in 12.04 is impossible to use by a newbie because of the empty
  Dash at start

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/962265/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 964580] Re: Icons of currently installing applications should go to Software Center installation screen when selected in the launcher

[manny]

it should not auto launch apps, it should follow same behavior from drag
and drop. bug: 732526

if the installation takes several minutes i dont want it to interrupt
(or even mess up) the task am currently doing.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964580

Title:
  Icons of currently installing applications should go to Software
  Center installation screen when selected in the launcher

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/964580/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 964580] Re: Icons of currently installing applications should go to Software Center installation screen when selected in the launcher

[manny]

sorry, bug link:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/732526

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964580

Title:
  Icons of currently installing applications should go to Software
  Center installation screen when selected in the launcher

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/964580/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 964011] Re: package bluez 4.98-2ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

[manny]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964011

Title:
  package bluez 4.98-2ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/964011/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 964011] [NEW] package bluez 4.98-2ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

[manny]

Public bug reported:

error

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: bluez 4.98-2ubuntu7
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-20.32-generic 3.2.12
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-20-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 1.95-0ubuntu1
AptOrdering:
 bluez: Configure
 bluez-alsa: Configure
 bluez-gstreamer: Configure
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Mar 20 08:30:51 2012
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 1
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Alpha amd64 
(20120201.1)
InterestingModules: bnep rfcomm bluetooth
MachineType: MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD MS-7529
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.2.0-20-generic 
root=UUID=94bb9afa-1553-458d-b6cc-a8342aa904b3 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: bluez
Title: package bluez 4.98-2ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess 
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 10/20/2008
dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
dmi.bios.version: V2.2
dmi.board.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.board.name: MS-7529
dmi.board.vendor: MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD
dmi.board.version: 1.0
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
dmi.chassis.type: 3
dmi.chassis.vendor: MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD
dmi.chassis.version: 1.0
dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrV2.2:bd10/20/2008:svnMICRO-STARINTERNATIONALCO.,LTD:pnMS-7529:pvr1.0:rvnMICRO-STARINTERNATIONALCO.,LTD:rnMS-7529:rvr1.0:cvnMICRO-STARINTERNATIONALCO.,LTD:ct3:cvr1.0:
dmi.product.name: MS-7529
dmi.product.version: 1.0
dmi.sys.vendor: MICRO-STAR INTERNATIONAL CO.,LTD
hciconfig:
 
rfkill:

** Affects: bluez (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package precise

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/964011

Title:
  package bluez 4.98-2ubuntu7 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
  installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bluez/+bug/964011/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 931245] Re: Finish the implementation of the locally integrated menubars

[manny]

@Danillo

your mockup is very similar to the oxygen-appmenu (which was the
inspiration for LIM)

http://www.webupd8.org/2011/11/oxygen-appmenu-replace-menu-with.html

It needs to be clear that the area is clickable just like in the kde
counterpart (or like firefox or opera do it.).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931245

Title:
  Finish the implementation of the locally integrated menubars

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/compiz-core/+bug/931245/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 955964] Re: Launcher - Chrome/mium duplicated and invisible launchers problem

[manny]

** Attachment added: Screenshot of duplicate chrome/ium launchers bugs
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955964/+attachment/2875150/+files/chrome-mium-multiple-launchers-invisible.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955964

Title:
  Launcher - Chrome/mium duplicated and invisible launchers problem

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/955964/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 955964] [NEW] Launcher - Chrome/mium duplicated and invisible launchers problem

[manny]

Public bug reported:

Multiple Chrome/mium launchers duplicated (some invisible) appear when 
launching the app in ubuntu 11.10.
 (screen attached)

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: unity 4.28.0-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-16.28-generic 3.0.17
Uname: Linux 3.0.0-16-generic i686
ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4
Architecture: i386
CompizPlugins: 
[core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,gnomecompat,regex,snap,resize,move,imgpng,compiztoolbox,place,vpswitch,session,mousepoll,grid,unitymtgrabhandles,animation,expo,wall,fade,scale,workarounds,ezoom,unityshell]
Date: Thu Mar 15 08:29:39 2012
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release i386 (20111012)
SourcePackage: unity
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: unity (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-bug i386 oneiric running-unity

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955964

Title:
  Launcher - Chrome/mium duplicated and invisible launchers problem

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/955964/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 955964] Re: Launcher - Chrome/mium duplicated and invisible launchers problem

[manny]

** Description changed:

- Multiple Chrome/mium launchers duplicated (some invisible) appear when 
launching the app in ubuntu 11.10.
-  (screen attached)
+ Multiple Chrome/mium launchers duplicated (some invisible) appear when
+ launching the app in ubuntu 11.10.
+ 
+ if the app is pinned and you close and launch again more duplicates keep 
appearing...
+  
+ (screen attached)
+ 
  
  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
  Package: unity 4.28.0-0ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.0.0-16.28-generic 3.0.17
  Uname: Linux 3.0.0-16-generic i686
  ApportVersion: 1.23-0ubuntu4
  Architecture: i386
  CompizPlugins: 
[core,bailer,detection,composite,opengl,decor,gnomecompat,regex,snap,resize,move,imgpng,compiztoolbox,place,vpswitch,session,mousepoll,grid,unitymtgrabhandles,animation,expo,wall,fade,scale,workarounds,ezoom,unityshell]
  Date: Thu Mar 15 08:29:39 2012
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric Ocelot - Release i386 (20111012)
  SourcePackage: unity
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/955964

Title:
  Launcher - Chrome/mium duplicated and invisible launchers problem

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/955964/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 682788] Re: Global menu is not ergonomical on large screens

[manny]

While LIM is a great advancement to solving this bug, but some people
don't seem convinced yet.

So from all the feedback from various discussions (here and on unity-
design), I can only conclude that an alternative worth exploring could
be something combined from these 2 proposals:

http://musl1m.deviantart.com/art/Windicators-well-sort-of-203350326

https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/682788/comments/106

Is still local and integrated, so it might be called LIM2.

to be fair and not a biased decision, a poll would be nice to see which
one users prefer:  prototype LIM1 or prototype LIM2.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682788

Title:
  Global menu is not ergonomical on large screens

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/682788/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 876146] Re: Upgrading Ubuntu is risky (unusable or unbootable PC). What can be done to safeguard data, revert failed upgrades and overall reduce the risks?

[manny]

linking this u1 design here just for reference:

http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/02/this-ubuntu-one-concept-hides-some-
neat-ideas-under-option-overload/

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876146

Title:
  Upgrading Ubuntu is risky (unusable or unbootable PC). What can be
  done to safeguard data, revert failed upgrades and overall reduce the
  risks?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/876146/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 894112] Re: Precise Pangolin - Please include ubuntuforums.org in the slideshow

[manny]

I think what ubuntu really needs is to make User Documentation easier to
access:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/860501


Easier access On Demand. Usually when you need support is not when installing 
ubuntu, but using it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/894112

Title:
  Precise Pangolin - Please include ubuntuforums.org in the slideshow

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity-slideshow-ubuntu/+bug/894112/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 878203] Re: Accesibility: Make update list sortable and add option to select/deselect all like in other update managers or synaptic

[manny]

** Description changed:

  Now that synaptic is gone from ubuntu, we need a more accessible way to
  manage updates. Thus some important synaptic features need to be brought
  back.
  
  A) Sorting
  Sorting was a very important accessibility feature in synaptic and  is also 
available in almost every other major OS ranging from mint update, Mac Os 
updater to Windows Update, etc.
  
  reference pics:
  
  mint:
- 
http://linuxcritic.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/mint-update-manager-580x413.jpg
+ http://www.linuxmint.com/pictures/screenshots/julia/mintupdate.png
  
  OSX:
  http://www.imacusers.com/images/updates.png
  
  Windows:
  http://www.portlock.com/images/windowsUpdateManager2.gif
  
  synaptic:
  http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/lifehacker/2009/10/synaptic.png
  
  B) select/deselect ALL (which also was a feature of synaptic)
  
- 
- In contrast ubuntu update manager is the least accessible and trying to 
manage updates with it can cause RSI (Repetitive strain injury).
+ In contrast ubuntu update manager is the least accessible and trying to
+ manage updates with it can cause RSI (Repetitive strain injury).
  
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Repetitive_strain_injury

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878203

Title:
  Accesibility: Make update list sortable and add option to
  select/deselect all like in other update managers or synaptic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/878203/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 878203] Re: Accesibility: Make update list sortable and add option to select/deselect all like in other update managers or synaptic

[manny]

@alanbell

Am not very familiar with a11y, but i believe this is for general
usability (sorting)..

For example I live in a 3rd world country so my internet is very slow
and unfortunately metered too, I cant just go and hit install All
updates.

I check which ones are worth it and I sort by size (mb), name, etc. So I
can only do so with synaptic, since update manager doesnt have sorting
and trying to find packages by size was worsening my RSI issues.

I have to go and install synaptic just for this.

In windows, mac, and most linux distros sorting is possible in their
respective update managers (as you can see in the pics).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/878203

Title:
  Accesibility: Make update list sortable and add option to
  select/deselect all like in other update managers or synaptic

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/878203/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 753969] Re: [launcher] Enable Backlight Toggles (active icons/apps) by default for Unity/Unity-2d

[manny]

** Summary changed:

- [launcher] Enable Backlight Toggles by default for Unity/Unity-2d
+ [launcher] Enable Backlight Toggles (active icons/apps) by default for 
Unity/Unity-2d

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753969

Title:
  [launcher] Enable Backlight Toggles (active icons/apps) by default for
  Unity/Unity-2d

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/753969/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 753969] Re: [launcher] Enable Backlight Toggles (active icons/apps) by default for Unity/Unity-2d

[manny]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 917951 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/917951

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 917951
   Launcher improvement for vision loss people

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/753969

Title:
  [launcher] Enable Backlight Toggles (active icons/apps) by default for
  Unity/Unity-2d

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/753969/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 944344] Re: startup application add - browse dialog is confusing

[manny]

it could be more like this proposal:

http://live.gnome.org/Design/SystemSettings/Proposals/LoginItems#Proposal

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/944344

Title:
  startup application add - browse dialog is confusing

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-session/+bug/944344/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 890747] Re: Keyboard shortcut - Ctrl Alt Del doesn't do what most people typing it would expect

[manny]

um , a way to kill resource hungry apps would had come in handy while
testing precise. Firefox made the entire system go into a crawl multiple
times on an atom netbook with 1gb ram (both unity 3d and 2d). Had to
turn it off the bad way by pressing the button on the laptop.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/890747

Title:
  Keyboard shortcut - Ctrl Alt Del doesn't do what most people typing it
  would expect

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/890747/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 939285] Re: dash forgets display prefrences between sessions

[manny]

also affects apps available for download.

if i disable them the option is forgotten on log-out or reboot.

and as you can see from the pic, there is a lot of area not being used
when user toggles fullscreen dash to view more rows.

** Attachment added: dash forgets sources too
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/939285/+attachment/2798282/+files/dash-forgets-sources.PNG

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/939285

Title:
  dash forgets display prefrences between sessions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/939285/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 841847] Re: Dash - unable to select multiple search filters within the same filter category simultaneously

[manny]

agree with #3

Also, another issue with multi-select is that everything gets mixed up ,
so you can't easily distinguish which individual category or  selected
filter an app belongs to.

submitted a bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity-lens-applications/+bug/941550

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841847

Title:
  Dash - unable to select multiple search filters within the same filter
  category simultaneously

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/841847/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 885849] Re: Dash - the physical format of the Dash (windowed or full screen) should be stateful across sessions

[manny]

Well i see that the filters are not remembered yet (for example apps
available for download still appear when i restart or logout and back
in) or when i set filters to show is not remembered either.

As far as remembering the dash size (windowed or full screen), that is
working, so i guess this bug is only about that.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885849

Title:
  Dash - the physical format of the Dash (windowed or full screen)
  should be stateful across sessions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/885849/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 885849] Re: Dash - the physical format of the Dash (windowed or full screen) should be stateful across sessions

[manny]

All settings are now remembered even filters ?

if so, great, but also needs a more proper desc/title.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885849

Title:
  Dash - the physical format of the Dash (windowed or full screen)
  should be stateful across sessions

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/885849/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 741014] Re: Lenses: icon view can make some lenses hard to use or browse large amount of items, need alternative views like a List or custom view to better display results

[manny]

** Description changed:

  Lenses: different type of views can help with browsing large number of
  items.
  
  -List view in particular is very effective and used in a number of
  applications including nautilus, music apps and traditional menus
  (gnome, kde, windows, mint, etc.). Useful for a number of different
  lenses.
  
+ -Zoom in and out (show more / less). Zooming out would allow to make the
+ icons smaller and show a bigger number of results. Default would be 48px
+ icons like on the launcher. Could be part of the filters or an
+ alternative view.
+ 
  -Askubuntu lens: a better view for these type of search results because
  of text strings being limited to the size of the icon in icon view.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741014

Title:
  Lenses: icon view can make some lenses hard to use or browse large
  amount of items, need alternative views like a List or custom view to
  better display results

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/askubuntu-lens/+bug/741014/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 741014] Re: Lenses: icon view can make some lenses hard to use or browse large amount of items, need alternative views like a List or custom view to better display results

[manny]

** Description changed:

  Lenses: different type of views can help with browsing large number of
  items.
  
  -List view in particular is very effective and used in a number of
  applications including nautilus, music apps and traditional menus
  (gnome, kde, windows, mint, etc.). Useful for a number of different
  lenses.
  
  -Zoom in and out (show more / less). Zooming out would allow to make the
  icons smaller and show a bigger number of results. Default would be 48px
- icons like on the launcher. Could be part of the filters or an
- alternative view.
+ icons like on the launcher for the apps lens. Could be part of the
+ filters or an alternative view. Zooming In on the other hand is useful
+ for showing thumbnails of files, pictures, music, video,etc. in their
+ respective lenses.
  
  -Askubuntu lens: a better view for these type of search results because
  of text strings being limited to the size of the icon in icon view.

** Summary changed:

- Lenses: icon view can make some lenses hard to use or browse large amount of 
items, need alternative views like a List or custom view to better display 
results
+ Lenses: fixed size icon view can make some lenses hard to use or browse large 
amount of items, need alternative views like a List, custom or zoom in/out 
views to better display results

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741014

Title:
  Lenses: fixed size icon view can make some lenses hard to use or
  browse large amount of items, need alternative views like a List,
  custom or zoom in/out views to better display results

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/askubuntu-lens/+bug/741014/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 841527] Re: Dash very slow with blur in Oneiric beta1[ATI report]

[manny]

for me the situation is much better than before. Not sure other people.

Tested with x1250 and 6310.

performance is ok. Probably the drivers have improved.

The tool for checking the performance seems a good idea. Specially if we
find any more regressions in the future.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/841527

Title:
  Dash very slow with blur in Oneiric beta1[ATI report]

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/841527/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 921322] Re: Dash - Show Search Filter permanent

[manny]

** Also affects: ayatana-design
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/921322

Title:
  Dash - Show Search Filter permanent

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/921322/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 741014] Re: icon view makes it hard to use, needs list or a custom view for the results

[manny]

** Also affects: unity-lens-applications
   Importance: Undecided
   Status: New

** Summary changed:

- icon view makes it hard to use, needs list or a custom view for the results
+ icon view can make it hard to use or browse large amount of items, needs a 
list or a custom view to better display results

** Summary changed:

- icon view can make it hard to use or browse large amount of items, needs a 
list or a custom view to better display results
+ Lenses: icon view can make some lenses hard to use or browse large amount of 
items, need alternative views like a List or custom view to better display 
results

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741014

Title:
  Lenses: icon view can make some lenses hard to use or browse large
  amount of items, need alternative views like a List or custom view to
  better display results

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/askubuntu-lens/+bug/741014/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 741014] Re: Lenses: icon view can make some lenses hard to use or browse large amount of items, need alternative views like a List or custom view to better display results

[manny]

** Description changed:

- a better view for these type of search results, which the dash
- developers will need to take in consideration, because of text strings
- being limited to the size of the icon.
+ Lenses: different type of views can help with browsing large number of
+ items.
  
- also some text characters dont show up correctly and instead show in the
- code format
+ -List view in particular is very effective and used in a number of
+ applications including nautilus, music apps and traditional menus
+ (gnome, kde, windows, mint, etc.). Useful for a number of different
+ lenses.
+ 
+ -Askubuntu lens: a better view for these type of search results because
+ of text strings being limited to the size of the icon in icon view.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/741014

Title:
  Lenses: icon view can make some lenses hard to use or browse large
  amount of items, need alternative views like a List or custom view to
  better display results

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/askubuntu-lens/+bug/741014/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 732526] Re: Dash - Drag and drop app install from App Lens to Launcher is broken

[manny]

When searching from the dash for example Skype and is not installed I
don't get the recommendations to install it from the apps available for
download in the home/main lens. I only get an empty search.

But when I do the same in the Apps-lens you do get the recommendations.

Searching directly from the home lens makes this functionality more
discoverable and is a great alternative to using the terminal and apt-
get on slower computers and not have to always wait for USC to open
(unless you want to read more info.)

Should another bug be open for this or is already in the plans to add
this functionality to the main/home lens?

It would also be preferable not to show the apps available for
download in the home-lens by default, but only on Searches since the
recommendations become more relevant and much better than getting no
results.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/732526

Title:
  Dash - Drag and drop app install from App Lens to Launcher is broken

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/732526/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 874896] Re: in Oneiric the Dash doesn't show any Musicfile in the Music Lense

[manny]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 935220 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/935220

** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 935220
   Dash: Lenses should always show some type of content or instructions by 
default instead of nothing. No more empty lenses.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874896

Title:
  in Oneiric the Dash doesn't show any Musicfile in the Music Lense

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/874896/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 874254] Re: top bar, integrated menu - when a application is first launched, the integrated menu should be displayed for 2 seconds before fading out of view

[manny]

I think the motive was good: make it more discoverable.

but those 2 seconds go extremely fast...

i know where it is and even i miss it (yes even by staring at it).

the problem is when a window opens people focus their eyes on the window
and not the top bar. When they focus the top bar the 2 seconds already
passed

so a few solutions might be:

-increase the second amount.

-visible again for a couple of seconds when you restore a window.

or

-confirm the user knows where it is, by keeping it visible for a while
or till the first time the user hovers on it.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874254

Title:
  top bar, integrated menu - when a application is first launched, the
  integrated menu should be displayed for 2 seconds before fading out of
  view

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/874254/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 810325] Re: NotifyOSD - Change background colour to use the same median colour used in the Oneiric dash

[manny]

i like it.

now the only thing that doesnt match with the rest is the top panel.

Gladly there is now an option for panel opacity auto-toggle for
maximized windows.

** Attachment added: panel-opacity-toggle.jpg
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/810325/+attachment/2724561/+files/panel-opacity-toggle.jpg

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/810325

Title:
  NotifyOSD - Change background colour to use the same median colour
  used in the Oneiric dash

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/810325/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 926144] Re: Unity Launcher Icons are black

[manny]

weird the recycle bin still has color.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/926144

Title:
  Unity Launcher Icons are black

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity/+bug/926144/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 876146] Re: Upgrading Ubuntu is risky (unusable or unbootable PC). What can be done to safeguard data, revert failed upgrades and overall reduce the risks?

[manny]

Apart from recommending the user to backup the files that matter to
them.

Another thing that is important and should be recommended is for the
user to try/test the new ubuntu version first.

And this can only be done right now with a disc or usb stick.

So if you insert a disc/usb one can be automatically created for you.

Once the user has tested the new version and verified everything works
and the performance is still acceptable on their hardware, then they can
choose to install/upgrade, right there from the disc/stick.

I think testing it first avoids some headaches and wasted-time by having
to revert everything back to a previous state/version later on.

Sure, You can still upgrade without doing the recommended steps of
testing and backing up, but do so at your risk, only if you know what
you're doing and have experienced to fix potential problems yourself.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876146

Title:
  Upgrading Ubuntu is risky (unusable or unbootable PC). What can be
  done to safeguard data, revert failed upgrades and overall reduce the
  risks?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/876146/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 876146] Re: Upgrading Ubuntu is risky (unusable or unbootable PC). What can be done to safeguard data, revert failed upgrades and overall reduce the risks?

[manny]

Oh wow. Everyone seems to be virtually at full capacity, but since this
is still very important I think that the implementation will need to be
As Simple As Possible for now and then refine or automate it more
later when there's a little more resources available.

Well I believe the most important thing to remind users is for them to
backup the files that matter to them. Be it to a External-disk or
Online (U1).

Their stuff is now safeguarded in case that something unexpected
happens.

As for restoring, I don't see a problem of doing it manually for now.
And usually when people restore they dont copy everything over since
they see the backup as another safe place to keep a lot of their stuff.

As for restoring the Apps i think USC has a sync feature ? But Am not
very familiar with that implementation yet.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/876146

Title:
  Upgrading Ubuntu is risky (unusable or unbootable PC). What can be
  done to safeguard data, revert failed upgrades and overall reduce the
  risks?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/null/+bug/876146/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 885738] Re: Dash - Remove Dash Home shortcut icons

[manny]

@kamstrup

Already looking good !!

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/885738

Title:
  Dash - Remove Dash Home shortcut icons

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/885738/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 682788] Re: Global menu is not ergonomical on large screens

[manny]

@pedro

actually i think you were confusing the various designs. The one in
comment #106 is persistent on button click (button could be small
windicator or app name, not the full titlebar itself). Mousing over the
title bar could create false positives in this design. Mouse over is
only good if its non persistent like on earlier suggestions, but that
has it's own set of pros/cons. The persistent design seems to be the
suggestion with less cons overall from most of the feed gathered.

@mmiicc (mpredotka)

I believe those are still mockups, but it gives hope ! :)

not sure which will be the final options yet. But it could be something
like this:

[X] Menu always integrated in top bar (global menu On)
[X] Integrated with individual windows (global menu Off)
[X] Global menu On + Button can toggle menu visibility in individual windows 
(combo)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682788

Title:
  Global menu is not ergonomical on large screens

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/682788/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 765819] Re: Launcher - Make Launcher left of screen reveal more responsive and less prone to false positives

[manny]

@danillo

well a tab is not a bad idea and would be tablet/finger friendly too.

not sure if it has to overlap apps. Maybe it could have it's own
vertical space on the side (as suggested on comment #9; which would also
serve to show where the alerts generated) and the tab could be more
compact and overlap less.

another thing that would be useful is being able to pin it (again
tablet friendly) and toggle the visibility to always visible and unpin
to go back to intelli-hide.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765819

Title:
  Launcher - Make Launcher left of screen reveal more responsive and
  less prone to false positives

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/765819/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 765819] Re: Launcher - Make Launcher left of screen reveal more responsive and less prone to false positives

[manny]

would also add that having a visible cue like a tab makes it more
intuitive.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765819

Title:
  Launcher - Make Launcher left of screen reveal more responsive and
  less prone to false positives

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/765819/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 773296] Re: Clicking on mounted volume launches two Nautilus windows

[manny]

why is this incomplete ?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773296

Title:
  Clicking on mounted volume launches two Nautilus windows

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/773296/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 773296] Re: Clicking on mounted volume launches two Nautilus windows

[manny]

** Package changed: nautilus (Ubuntu) = unity

** Changed in: unity
   Status: Expired = Confirmed

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/773296

Title:
  Clicking on mounted volume launches two Nautilus windows

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/773296/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 682788] Re: Global menu is not ergonomical on large screens

[manny]

@pedro

i know you want this fixed like everyone here, but please try to keep
things on topic.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/682788

Title:
  Global menu is not ergonomical on large screens

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/682788/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 765819] Re: Launcher - Make Launcher left of screen reveal more responsive and less prone to false positives

[manny]

@hadmut

the global menu problem is another bug entirely:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/unity/+bug/682788

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765819

Title:
  Launcher - Make Launcher left of screen reveal more responsive and
  less prone to false positives

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/765819/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 765819] Re: Launcher - Make Launcher left of screen reveal more responsive and less prone to false positives

[manny]

Please keep in mind that this is not just a problem of particular
programs like Firefox or Chrome. E.g. when using a regular terminal in
full screen mode, it is impossible to mark lines for copy/paste if you
want to mark them from the leftmost column.

i agree.

A simple solution might be to move the launcher to the right instead of
the left window side, which seems to be less important. Furthermore, a
toolbar at the left side is not really ergonomic, since most people are
right handers and thus prefer buttons, handles etc. on the right side.

hmm, right side might suffer even more from false positives when
manipulating the scrollbar.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/765819

Title:
  Launcher - Make Launcher left of screen reveal more responsive and
  less prone to false positives

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ayatana-design/+bug/765819/+subscriptions

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs