[Bug 1843507] Re: apt-get update to latest libidn2.so.0 causes multiple application failures including apt-update
you can check what exact version do you have in repos executing: apt-cache show libidn2-0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843507 Title: apt-get update to latest libidn2.so.0 causes multiple application failures including apt-update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libidn2/+bug/1843507/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1843507] Re: apt-get update to latest libidn2.so.0 causes multiple application failures including apt-update
so it is already fixed? which version is new package? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843507 Title: apt-get update to latest libidn2.so.0 causes multiple application failures including apt-update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libidn2/+bug/1843507/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1843507] Re: apt-get update to latest libidn2.so.0 causes multiple application failures including apt-update
in addition to #4 I had to purge all versions of libidn2-0 including i386 executing SEVERAL TIMES: dpkg --purge --force-all libidn2-0 so my full process was like: wget http://mirrors.kernel.org/ubuntu/pool/main/libi/libidn2/libidn2-0_2.0.4-1.1build2_amd64.deb dpkg --purge --force-all libidn2-0 && dpkg --purge --force-all libidn2-0 && dpkg --purge --force-all libidn2-0 && dpkg --purge --force-all libidn2-0 dpkg -i libidn2-0_2.0.4-1.1build2_amd64.deb apt-mark hold libidn2-0 apt --fix-broken install apt-get update apt-get upgrade -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1843507 Title: apt-get update to latest libidn2.so.0 causes multiple application failures including apt-update To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libidn2/+bug/1843507/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1581713] Re: Ubuntu Software always asks for an Ubuntu Single Sign-On account when installing or removing a snap package
I get what sabdfl is trying to achieve, but I don't understand why this isn't just an option. forcing people to log in on Ubuntu SSO to install or remove a package don't seem a nice policy from a desktop perspective. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1581713 Title: Ubuntu Software always asks for an Ubuntu Single Sign-On account when installing or removing a snap package To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-gnome/+bug/1581713/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1626749] Re: autofs set $USER to "root" instead of current user
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1629204 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1629204 I just hit this bug and it's really a stopper for me. I'll downgrade kernel until is resolved. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1626749 Title: autofs set $USER to "root" instead of current user To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1626749/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1300722] Re: hud-service is eating up 100% of one of my CPUs in a poll loop
I'm still hitting this bug in some machines. Is there any known workaround? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1300722 Title: hud-service is eating up 100% of one of my CPUs in a poll loop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ufrs-apt/+bug/1300722/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1300722] Re: hud-service is eating up 100% of one of my CPUs in a poll loop
several other machines are affected by this bug in our workplace. not sure if it's worth to mention but one machine NOT displaying this behavior is a 32b system, while the rest are 64b. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1300722 Title: hud-service is eating up 100% of one of my CPUs in a poll loop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hud/+bug/1300722/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1411225] Re: bad pam stack allows introducing any password on all users
I've confirmed that /usr/share/pam-configs/pam_script is NOT part of upstream package. There's even a warning in docs regarding PAM stack: Pam_script.so is listed as required so failures will affect the outcome of the PAM stack, particularly for authentication, which will lock a user with greater than deny login failures. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1411225 Title: bad pam stack allows introducing any password on all users To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpam-script/+bug/1411225/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1411225] Re: bad pam stack allows introducing any password on all users
I think profile belongs to package mantainer, not upstream. at least that's what I can see on http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty /libpam-script just take a look at: http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/universe/libp/libpam-script/libpam-script_1.1.6-1.debian.tar.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1411225 Title: bad pam stack allows introducing any password on all users To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libpam-script/+bug/1411225/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1300722] Re: hud-service is eating up 100% of one of my CPUs in a poll loop
I'm affected by this bug too. $ lsb_release -a No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS Release:14.04 Codename: trusty $ uname -a Linux cprli0792 3.13.0-44-generic #73-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 16 00:22:43 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux $ dpkg -l | grep hud ii hud 14.04+14.04.20140604-0ubuntu1 amd64Backend for the Unity HUD ii libhud2:amd64 14.04+14.04.20140604-0ubuntu1 amd64library for exporting items to the Unity HUD ask me for further info if you need it -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1300722 Title: hud-service is eating up 100% of one of my CPUs in a poll loop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/hud/+bug/1300722/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1240870] Re: nautilus performance when copying several files from smbnetfs (fuse)
** Description changed: I'm using smbnetfs for accesing a remote fileserver: -smbnetfs on /tmp/test type fuse.smbnetfs + smbnetfs on /tmp/test type fuse.smbnetfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,user=e1) when I copy a directory with several (hundreds) of files performance is really bad and it takes lot of time. for example a directori with 300 files takes 5 seconds with `cp' command -$ time cp -r USMT301/ /tmp/ + $ time cp -r USMT301/ /tmp/ -real 0m4.671s -user 0m0.020s -sys0m0.128s + real 0m4.671s + user 0m0.020s + sys0m0.128s and with nautilus takes about 10 minutes. so it's clearly a problem with nautilus, not smbnetfs. if you copy just one big file (for example an ISO) performance is OK. to replicate just launch smbnetfs and copy a dir with several files with nautilus. I'm not sure if it affects other fuse filesystems and it seems related to nautilus not recognizing fuse mount point as a remote filesystem. maybe related: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=101691 + https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657208 + this is a critical stopper for me as I already migrated 50 desktops to linux in my department and I just discovered this. any solution or workaround will be really wellcome. please, ask for further info. + $ lsb_release -rd + Description: Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS + Release: 12.04 -$ lsb_release -rd -Description: Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS -Release: 12.04 - - -ii nautilus 1:3.4.2-0ubuntu8 file manager and graphical shell for GNOME -ii smbnetfs 0.5.3a-1 User-space filesystem for SMB/NMB (Windows) network servers + ii nautilus 1:3.4.2-0ubuntu8 file manager and graphical shell for GNOME + ii smbnetfs 0.5.3a-1 User-space filesystem for SMB/NMB (Windows) network servers -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1240870 Title: nautilus performance when copying several files from smbnetfs (fuse) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1240870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1240870] [NEW] nautilus performance when copying several files from smbnetfs (fuse)
Public bug reported: I'm using smbnetfs for accesing a remote fileserver: smbnetfs on /tmp/test type fuse.smbnetfs (rw,nosuid,nodev,user=e1) when I copy a directory with several (hundreds) of files performance is really bad and it takes lot of time. for example a directori with 300 files takes 5 seconds with `cp' command $ time cp -r USMT301/ /tmp/ real 0m4.671s user 0m0.020s sys 0m0.128s and with nautilus takes about 10 minutes. so it's clearly a problem with nautilus, not smbnetfs. if you copy just one big file (for example an ISO) performance is OK. to replicate just launch smbnetfs and copy a dir with several files with nautilus. I'm not sure if it affects other fuse filesystems and it seems related to nautilus not recognizing fuse mount point as a remote filesystem. maybe related: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=101691 this is a critical stopper for me as I already migrated 50 desktops to linux in my department and I just discovered this. any solution or workaround will be really wellcome. please, ask for further info. $ lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu 12.04.3 LTS Release: 12.04 ii nautilus 1:3.4.2-0ubuntu8 file manager and graphical shell for GNOME ii smbnetfs 0.5.3a-1 User-space filesystem for SMB/NMB (Windows) network servers ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: nautilus performance smbnetfs -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1240870 Title: nautilus performance when copying several files from smbnetfs (fuse) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1240870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1240870] Re: nautilus performance when copying several files from smbnetfs (fuse)
** Attachment added: note that even if it says 4 minutes it actually takes a lot more as it gets down to 20 kB/s https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1240870/+attachment/3880021/+files/Captura%20de%202013-10-17%2011%3A13%3A51.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1240870 Title: nautilus performance when copying several files from smbnetfs (fuse) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1240870/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1009013] Re: incorrect password policy messages
why this bug is still marked as Incomplete? must I provide more info? is there anything else I can do to help in this issue? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009013 Title: incorrect password policy messages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1009013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1023839] [NEW] nautilus add additional leading slash
Public bug reported: In some cases Nautilus adds an additional leading slash to file path which makes some programs fail (libreoffice for example). Seems to be related to remote files mounted via smbnetfs. When I double click on some file it doesn't open, libreoffice just closes without any message. If I drag some file from nautilus to gnome-terminal I can see that an additional slash is added. for example: this file path: '/home/muzzol/NetSMB/networking/test.odt' is converted to: '//home/muzzol/NetSMB/networking/test.odt' and libreoffice fails to open it. Not shure how nautilus identifies a path as a network path, but it seems that is somehow affecting absolute path formation. $ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Release:12.04 $ dpkg -l | grep nautilus ii libnautilus-extension1a1:3.4.2-0ubuntu3 libraries for nautilus components - runtime version ii nautilus 1:3.4.2-0ubuntu3 file manager and graphical shell for GNOME ii nautilus-data 1:3.4.2-0ubuntu3 data files for nautilus ii nautilus-sendto3.0.1-2ubuntu2 integrates Evolution and Pidgin into the Nautilus file manager ii nautilus-sendto-empathy3.4.2.1-0ubuntu1 GNOME multi-protocol chat and call client (nautilus-sendto plugin) ii nautilus-share 0.7.3-1ubuntu2 Nautilus extension to share folder using Samba ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1023839 Title: nautilus add additional leading slash To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/1023839/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1009013] Re: incorrect password policy messages
Hi, I've done some more tests and I've found that using server side policy instead of shadow policies it asks for new password as it should. warning message behaves the same and it's too fast for user to see something. I've detecte a new problem about localization. when new password is asked to user, some strings are translated and some others aren't. I'm not sure if these strings belong to lightdm or sssd. so to be accurate there's three problems: - lightdm doesn't understand shadow password expiration - lightdm doesn't show pam warnings correctly - localization incomplete for password changing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009013 Title: incorrect password policy messages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1009013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1009013] Re: incorrect password policy messages
I'm not sure if this should be two separated issues: - lightdm not displaying PAM messages: when some module shows a message (Your password is expiring in 5 days) ligthdm should wait for some seconds or even wait for user interaction (OK button). - lightdm not giving option to change expired password: when user password is expired there should appear a dialog for changing it. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009013 Title: incorrect password policy messages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1009013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1009013] [NEW] incorrect password policy messages
Public bug reported: I've configured LDAP auth with sssd package and lightdm is not understanding policy messages. when user password is expired it says Password incorrect and that's not true. in /var/log/auth.log it says: Jun 5 15:25:48 cprli0554 lightdm: pam_sss(lightdm:auth): received for user pepet6: 13 (User account has expired) also, when user is in warning state there's a message that appears for very short time in screen and user is not able not read it. again in /var/log/auth.log: Jun 5 15:28:50 cprli0554 lightdm: pam_sss(lightdm:auth): User info message: Your password will expire in 4 day(s). I'm planning a huge migration and these kind of bugs gives lot of confusion to users (so lot of tickets opened for support). ask for further info. # lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Release:12.04 # apt-cache policy lightdm lightdm: Instaŀlat: 1.2.1-0ubuntu1 Candidat: 1.2.1-0ubuntu1 Taula de versió: *** 1.2.1-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status ** Affects: lightdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009013 Title: incorrect password policy messages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1009013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1009013] Re: incorrect password policy messages
** Description changed: I've configured LDAP auth with sssd package and lightdm is not understanding policy messages. - - when user password is expired it says Password incorrect and that's not true. + when user password is expired it says Password incorrect and that's + not true. in /var/log/auth.log it says: - Jun 5 15:25:48 cprli0554 lightdm: pam_sss(lightdm:auth): received for + Jun 5 15:25:48 cprli0554 lightdm: pam_sss(lightdm:auth): received for user pepet6: 13 (User account has expired) - - also, when user is in warning state there's a message that appears for very short time in screen and user is not able not read it. + also, when user is in warning state there's a message that appears for + very short time in screen and user is not able not read it. again in /var/log/auth.log: - Jun 5 15:28:50 cprli0554 lightdm: pam_sss(lightdm:auth): User info + Jun 5 15:28:50 cprli0554 lightdm: pam_sss(lightdm:auth): User info message: Your password will expire in 4 day(s). - I'm planning a huge migration and these kind of bugs gives lot of confusion to users (so lot of tickets opened for support). - ask for further info. - - # lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Release: 12.04 - # apt-cache policy lightdm lightdm: - Instaŀlat: 1.2.1-0ubuntu1 - Candidat: 1.2.1-0ubuntu1 - Taula de versió: - *** 1.2.1-0ubuntu1 0 - 500 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages - 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status + Instaŀlat: 1.2.1-0ubuntu1 + Candidat: 1.2.1-0ubuntu1 + Taula de versió: + *** 1.2.1-0ubuntu1 0 + 500 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages + 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status + + + maybe related: + + https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/972537 + https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/856269 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009013 Title: incorrect password policy messages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1009013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1009013] Re: incorrect password policy messages
apport information ** Tags added: apport-collected precise ** Description changed: I've configured LDAP auth with sssd package and lightdm is not understanding policy messages. when user password is expired it says Password incorrect and that's not true. in /var/log/auth.log it says: Jun 5 15:25:48 cprli0554 lightdm: pam_sss(lightdm:auth): received for user pepet6: 13 (User account has expired) also, when user is in warning state there's a message that appears for very short time in screen and user is not able not read it. again in /var/log/auth.log: Jun 5 15:28:50 cprli0554 lightdm: pam_sss(lightdm:auth): User info message: Your password will expire in 4 day(s). I'm planning a huge migration and these kind of bugs gives lot of confusion to users (so lot of tickets opened for support). ask for further info. # lsb_release -rd Description: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Release: 12.04 # apt-cache policy lightdm lightdm: Instaŀlat: 1.2.1-0ubuntu1 Candidat: 1.2.1-0ubuntu1 Taula de versió: *** 1.2.1-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/main i386 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status maybe related: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/972537 https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/856269 + --- + ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0ubuntu9 + Architecture: i386 + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04 + InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release i386 (20120423.2) + Package: lightdm 1.2.1-0ubuntu1 + PackageArchitecture: i386 + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-25.40-generic-pae 3.2.18 + Tags: precise + Uname: Linux 3.2.0-25-generic-pae i686 + UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) + UserGroups: + + mtime.conffile..etc.pam.d.lightdm: 2012-05-31T10:52:21.210434 ** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009013/+attachment/3176212/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009013 Title: incorrect password policy messages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1009013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1009013] modified.conffile..etc.pam.d.lightdm.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: modified.conffile..etc.pam.d.lightdm.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009013/+attachment/3176214/+files/modified.conffile..etc.pam.d.lightdm.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009013 Title: incorrect password policy messages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1009013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1009013] ProcEnviron.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: ProcEnviron.txt https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009013/+attachment/3176213/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009013 Title: incorrect password policy messages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1009013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1009013] Re: incorrect password policy messages
to reproduce: 1 configure sssd with one LDAP domain 2 force some user password expiration changing 'shadowLastChange' 3 try to login with that user result: user login is rejected and appears a message that says password is incorrect expected result: a message telling user that password is expired and gives user chance to set a new one. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009013 Title: incorrect password policy messages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1009013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1009013] Re: incorrect password policy messages
this is my sssd.conf file: [sssd] config_file_version = 2 reconnection_retries = 3 sbus_timeout = 30 services = nss, pam domains = XX.net [nss] filter_groups = root filter_users = root reconnection_retries = 3 [pam] reconnection_retries = 3 [domain/XX.net] ; Using enumerate = true leads to high load and slow response enumerate = false cache_credentials = true id_provider = ldap auth_provider = ldap chpass_provider = ldap ldap_uri = ldap://ldap.XX.net ldap_search_base = dc=,dc=global ldap_group_search_base = cn=rol-domini,ou=Rols,ou=Groups,dc=,dc=global?base?(cn=rol-domini)?ou=Groups,dc=,dc=global?onelevel? ldap_user_search_base = ou=Users,dc=,dc=global?subtree?(objectclass=inetorgperson) ldap_tls_reqcert = allow ldap_tls_cacertdir = /etc/ssl/certs ldap_pwd_policy = shadow -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009013 Title: incorrect password policy messages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/1009013/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1004396] [NEW] creating launcher from menu fails for libreoffice applications
Public bug reported: # lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 12.04 LTS Release:12.04 # apt-cache policy xfce4-panel xfce4-panel: Installed: (none) Candidate: 4.8.6-2ubuntu2 Version table: 4.8.6-2ubuntu2 0 500 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ precise/universe i386 Packages when I drag and drop any launcher from application menu it creates a desktop launcher without problems except for libreoffice applications. it creates a broken link in my desktop. the only difference between libreoffice apps and the rest is that launchers in /usr/share/applications are soft links pointing to ../../lib/libreoffice/share/xdg and xfce menu don't like that ** Affects: xfce4-panel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: launcher libreoffice xfce4 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004396 Title: creating launcher from menu fails for libreoffice applications To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xfce4-panel/+bug/1004396/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1004396] Re: creating launcher from menu fails for libreoffice applications
I see, sorry for the confusion. I can see that there's another soft link in /usr/share/applications but is pointing to an absolute path: ubuntu-nvidia-settings.desktop - /etc/alternatives/i386-linux- gnu_nvidia_desktop maybe will be enough with changing relative to absolute paths to resolv this bug. or copy destination file instead of link -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1004396 Title: creating launcher from menu fails for libreoffice applications To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/thunar/+bug/1004396/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 684049] Re: unity launcher displays empty launcher button / type=link folder not supported
this bug also affects me. is limited unity launcher to Type=Application by design? I would like to create shortcuts to some URL but Type=URL don't work. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/684049 Title: unity launcher displays empty launcher button / type=link folder not supported To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bamf/+bug/684049/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 797080] Re: [needs-packaging] Cinelerra
about 4 or 5 years ago I was trying to package cinelerra with the goal of including it in official repos. the problem was (and still is) about licensing. people of http://www.heroinewarrior.com doesn't really help to resolve the situation and the whole issue was stalled. that was the main reason about creating lumiera. so is not about technical problems that cinelerra isn't in the repos, but licensing ones. if you wanna be helpful, maybe you can join cinelerra ml and work on that direction. but be advised, I tried and got tired of all bureaucratic details that some people didn't want to resolve. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/797080 Title: [needs-packaging] Cinelerra To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/797080/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 886820] Re: [Kubuntu 11.10] Screen brightness control does not work on Samsung RV511 laptop
my toshiba satellite l735 is also affected by this bug. i can't modify brightness and having always full brigth affects battery life. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/886820 Title: [Kubuntu 11.10] Screen brightness control does not work on Samsung RV511 laptop To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/886820/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 561201] Re: does not create the image of audio CD
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 529696 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529696 i can confirm this bug. in plugins window i can see that brasero can see cdrdao but it says version is too old so it stays greyed i can't be used. -- does not create the image of audio CD https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/561201 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 575068] [NEW] openbox doesn't honour xdg autostart
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: openbox
openbox bypasses xdg autostart entries.
i've created a test entry in /etc/xdg/autostart
cat /etc/xdg/autostart/test.desktop
[Desktop Entry]
Encoding=UTF-8
Exec=/usr/local/bin/test.sh
Name=test
Comment=execute a test script
Terminal=false
Type=Application
StartupNotify=false
then i've created the test script /usr/local/bin/test.sh :
#
#!/bin/bash
FLOG=/tmp/${USER}-test.log
umask 0077
exec $FLOG
echo `date` - $USER - $0
#
then i try to log in with openbox and nothing is executed. if i log in
with xfce script is executed as expected.
lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS
Release:10.04
apt-cache policy openbox
openbox:
Instal·lat: 3.4.10-1
Candidat: 3.4.10-1
Taula de versió:
*** 3.4.10-1 0
500 http://mirror.ousli.org/ubuntu/ lucid/universe Packages
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
ask for further info if you want.
** Affects: openbox (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
openbox doesn't honour xdg autostart
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575068
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Re: [Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP on Karmic breaks 'su' and 'sudo'
2010/4/27 Hark ubu...@komkommerkom.com: Rune: The first solution (nscd) is not waterproof as nscd tends to crash quite often (and thus revoking your ability to do su or sudo as ldap user) i use a combination of LDAP + NSCD + cached credentials (ccreds) and i can do su or sudo without problems. -- ^ ^ O O (_ _) muzzol(a)muzzol.com jabber id: muzzol(a)jabber.dk No atribueixis qualitats humanes als ordinadors. No els hi agrada. El gobierno español sólo habla con terroristas, homosexuales y catalanes, a ver cuando se decide a hablar con gente normal Jiménez Losantos echelon spamming bomb terrorism bush aznar teletubbies /echelon spamming -- NSS using LDAP on Karmic breaks 'su' and 'sudo' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Server Team, which is subscribed to libnss-ldap in ubuntu. -- Ubuntu-server-bugs mailing list Ubuntu-server-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-server-bugs
Re: [Bug 423252] Re: NSS using LDAP on Karmic breaks 'su' and 'sudo'
2010/4/27 Hark ubu...@komkommerkom.com: Rune: The first solution (nscd) is not waterproof as nscd tends to crash quite often (and thus revoking your ability to do su or sudo as ldap user) i use a combination of LDAP + NSCD + cached credentials (ccreds) and i can do su or sudo without problems. -- ^ ^ O O (_ _) muzzol(a)muzzol.com jabber id: muzzol(a)jabber.dk No atribueixis qualitats humanes als ordinadors. No els hi agrada. El gobierno español sólo habla con terroristas, homosexuales y catalanes, a ver cuando se decide a hablar con gente normal Jiménez Losantos echelon spamming bomb terrorism bush aznar teletubbies /echelon spamming -- NSS using LDAP on Karmic breaks 'su' and 'sudo' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/423252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414189] Re: package doesn't provide init script
which credentials will use this init script? if it's root ones i think is a bad idea. also, an init script for something userspace oriented is not really needed. -- package doesn't provide init script https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414189 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 293233] Re: crashing with SIGABRT while scanning network or reading some files
i wrote a fusesmb.cache replacement. you can try it alone and see the results in $HOME/.smb/fusesmb.cache file to truly replace fusesmb.cache just rename the original mv -f /usr/bin/fusesmb.cache /usr/bin/fusesmb.cache.orig and copy my script to /usr/bin/fusesmb.cache it generates a log on /tmp/muzsmbls.log test it and modify it at your will. ** Attachment added: fusesmb.cache replacement http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22449158/muzsmbls.sh -- crashing with SIGABRT while scanning network or reading some files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293233 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 49007] Re: The script is looking for /etc/ldap.secret
i can reproduce it in feisty also. libnss introduces a change in its behaviour, now the file used is /etc/libnss-ldap.secret but ldapscripts are still looking for /etc/ldap.secret a simple soft link solves de problem, maybe should be done by debconf postscript. Package: ldapscripts Priority: optional Section: universe/admin Installed-Size: 216 Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: all Version: 1.4-2 Depends: libpam-ldap, libnss-ldap, slapd, ldap-utils, sharutils Filename: pool/universe/l/ldapscripts/ldapscripts_1.4-2_all.deb lsb_release --all No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 7.04 Release:7.04 Codename: feisty -- The script is looking for /etc/ldap.secret https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/49007 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 126759] _ldapinit doesn't work with default slapd configuration
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ldapscripts steps to reproduce: - install slapd - install and configure ldapscripts - execute _ldapinit detailed info: when you install slapd debconf creates two objects, root organization and admin user: dn: dc=nodomain objectClass: top objectClass: dcObject objectClass: organization o: nodomain dc: nodomain dn: cn=admin,dc=nodomain objectClass: simpleSecurityObject objectClass: organizationalRole cn: admin description: LDAP administrator _ldapinit is intented to initially populate ldap with basic entries but it fails with default slapd configuration: # _ldapinit Error initializing LDAP tree tail /var/log/ldapscripts.log 07/18/07 - 15:02 : Command : /usr/bin/_ldapinit ldap_add: Already exists (68) Error initializing LDAP tree to avoid this error there's two options: 1- stop the slapd server, remove the BDB files on /var/lib/ldap/*, start slapd again, execute _ldapinit 2- modify _ldapinit to avoid conflicts with pre-populated slapd i think second approach is better and i recommend a new file (_ldapinit.debian). this is a diff against _ldapinit and _ldapinit.debian (a copy of the first) that solves the problem: diff -u _ldapinit _ldapinit.debian --- _ldapinit 2007-07-18 14:59:28.0 +0200 +++ _ldapinit.debian2007-07-18 15:04:32.0 +0200 @@ -35,13 +35,6 @@ end_ok Successfully initialized LDAP tree # Ldif info ## -##dn: suffix -##objectClass: dcObject -##objectClass: organization -##dc: _suffix -##o: _suffix -##description: _suffix -## ##dn: usuffix,suffix ##objectClass: top ##objectClass: organizationalUnit as you can see, is enough with removing the root object to avoid errors. instead of creating a file called _ldapinit.debian we could rename the original to something like _ldapinit.flat and keep modified one as _ldapinit related info: lsb_release --all No LSB modules are available. Distributor ID: Ubuntu Description:Ubuntu 7.04 Release:7.04 Codename: feisty Package: ldapscripts Priority: optional Section: universe/admin Installed-Size: 216 Maintainer: Pierre Habouzit [EMAIL PROTECTED] Architecture: all Version: 1.4-2 ** Affects: ldapscripts (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- _ldapinit doesn't work with default slapd configuration https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/126759 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 98565] udevinfo has no information about -d option
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: udev i can't find any reference to -d parameter in help or man: == # udevinfo -h Usage: udevinfo [-anpqrVh] -q TYPE query database for the specified value: 'name'name of device node 'symlink' pointing to node 'path'sysfs device path 'env' the device related imported environment 'all' all values -p PATH sysfs device path used for query or chain -n NAME node/symlink name used for query -r prepend to query result or print udev_root -a print all SYSFS_attributes along the device chain -e export the content of the udev database -V print udev version -h print this help text == # man udevinfo == [...] OPTIONS -q Query the database for specified type of device data. It needs the -p or -n to identify the specified device. Valid queries are: name, symlink, path, env, all. -a Print all sysfs properties of the specified device that can be used in udev rules to match the specified device. It prints all devices along the chain, up to the root of sysfs that can be used in udev rules. -p device-path The sysfs path of the device to query. -n node-name The name of the device node or a symlink to query -r The udev root directory: /dev. If used in conjunction with a name or symlink query, the query returns the absolute path. -e Export the content of the udev database. -h Print help text. AUTHOR [...] == but i can actually execute this command: == # udevinfo -d /block/hda=/dev/hda /block/hda/hda1=/dev/hda1 /block/hda/hda2=/dev/hda2 /block/hda/hda3=/dev/hda3 /block/hda/hda4=/dev/hda4 /block/hda/hda5=/dev/hda5 /block/hda/hda6=/dev/hda6 /class/input/input0/event0=/dev/input/event0 /class/input/mice=/dev/input/mice /class/misc/device-mapper=/dev/mapper/control /class/sound/controlC0=/dev/snd/controlC0 /class/sound/pcmC0D0c=/dev/snd/pcmC0D0c /class/sound/pcmC0D0p=/dev/snd/pcmC0D0p /class/sound/pcmC0D1c=/dev/snd/pcmC0D1c /class/sound/timer=/dev/snd/timer /class/usb_device/usbdev1.1=/dev/bus/usb/001/001 /class/usb_device/usbdev2.1=/dev/bus/usb/002/001 /class/usb_device/usbdev3.1=/dev/bus/usb/003/001 == and is really usefull for reporting current mappings. docs should be updated ** Affects: udev (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- udevinfo has no information about -d option https://launchpad.net/bugs/98565 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 58490] Re: [Bug 58490] Re: applet should show IP on tooltip
ok, thanks for the answer. i didnt know that new features go to +specs, so i filled as a bug. i'll do that. muzzol En/na Cody A.W. Somerville ha escrit: Thanks for your report. Your idea might get more attention and have the possibility of being implemented if you would submit a specification for this. You should first check whether it already exists at the Ubuntu specs page (https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+specs) in Launchpad. If that is the case, feel free to contact the drafter of that spec about your comments/suggestions. Otherwise you can start writing a spec following the steps described in https://wiki.ubuntu.com/FeatureSpecifications. ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: Unconfirmed = Rejected ** Summary changed: - applet should show IP on tooltip + RFE: applet should show IP on tooltip ** Description changed: Binary package hint: network-manager-gnome - is pretty usual to check what ip your computer have. + It is pretty usual to check what ip your computer have. adding ip to tooltip rather than right clicking on Information will increase usability. ** Tags added: usability -- RFE: applet should show IP on tooltip https://launchpad.net/bugs/58490 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 58490] applet should show IP on tooltip
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager-gnome is pretty usual to check what ip your computer have. adding ip to tooltip rather than right clicking on Information will increase usability. ** Affects: network-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- applet should show IP on tooltip https://launchpad.net/bugs/58490 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 56007] file with version information
Public bug reported: by now is dificult to identify distribution/version. a file such as /etc/ubuntu-release or /etc/ubuntu-version with some info in it should help scripts and admins to quickly identify actual version. several distributions use this approach. actually ubuntu uses /etc/debian_version but isn't usefull. ** Affects: Ubuntu Importance: Untriaged Status: Unconfirmed -- file with version information https://launchpad.net/bugs/56007 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
