[Bug 1934409] Re: Only one monitor showing in Color Corrections - System Settings Module
And yes, xrandr at all times shows this: andrew@desky:~$ xrandr --verbose Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 3840 x 1080, maximum 16384 x 16384 DisplayPort-0 connected primary 1920x1080+0+0 (0x5a) normal (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 480mm x 270mm Identifier: 0x55 Timestamp: 9033 Subpixel: unknown Gamma: 0.92:0.94:0.90 Brightness: 1.0 Clones: CRTC: 0 CRTCs: 0 1 2 3 4 5 Transform: 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 filter: EDID: 00001e6d355b01010101 0b1a0104a53c2278fb7b45a4554aa227 0b5054210800714081c0810081809500 9040a9c0b3002a4480a0703827403020 3500e00e111e00fd00284b55 5512010a20202020202000fc004d 503539470a20202020202020023a8018 71382d40582c4500e00e111e016f 02031cf149900403011012101f132309 0707830165030c00123a8018 71382d40582c4500fe22111e011d 007251d01e206e285500fe22111e 8c0ad08a20e02d10103e9600fe221100 0018 00e2 GAMMA_LUT_SIZE: 4096 range: (0, -1) DEGAMMA_LUT_SIZE: 4096 range: (0, -1) GAMMA_LUT: 0 range: (0, 65535) CTM: 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 DEGAMMA_LUT: 0 range: (0, 65535) TearFree: auto supported: off, on, auto subconnector: Native supported: Unknown, VGA, DVI-D, HDMI, DP, Wireless, Native HDCP Content Type: HDCP Type0 supported: HDCP Type0, HDCP Type1 Content Protection: Undesired supported: Undesired, Desired, Enabled vrr_capable: 1 range: (0, 1) max bpc: 8 range: (8, 16) underscan vborder: 0 range: (0, 128) underscan hborder: 0 range: (0, 128) underscan: off supported: off, on, auto scaling mode: None supported: None, Full, Center, Full aspect link-status: Good supported: Good, Bad CONNECTOR_ID: 94 supported: 94 non-desktop: 0 range: (0, 1) 1920x1080 (0x5a) 174.500MHz +HSync +VSync *current +preferred h: width 1920 start 1968 end 2000 total 2080 skew0 clock 83.89KHz v: height 1080 start 1083 end 1088 total 1119 clock 74.97Hz 1920x1080 (0x5b) 148.500MHz +HSync +VSync h: width 1920 start 2008 end 2052 total 2200 skew0 clock 67.50KHz v: height 1080 start 1084 end 1089 total 1125 clock 60.00Hz 1920x1080 (0x5c) 148.500MHz +HSync +VSync h: width 1920 start 2448 end 2492 total 2640 skew0 clock 56.25KHz v: height 1080 start 1084 end 1089 total 1125 clock 50.00Hz 1920x1080 (0x5d) 148.352MHz +HSync +VSync h: width 1920 start 2008 end 2052 total 2200 skew0 clock 67.43KHz v: height 1080 start 1084 end 1089 total 1125 clock 59.94Hz 1680x1050 (0x5e) 146.250MHz -HSync +VSync h: width 1680 start 1784 end 1960 total 2240 skew0 clock 65.29KHz v: height 1050 start 1053 end 1059 total 1089 clock 59.95Hz 1400x1050 (0x5f) 121.750MHz -HSync +VSync h: width 1400 start 1488 end 1632 total 1864 skew0 clock 65.32KHz v: height 1050 start 1053 end 1057 total 1089 clock 59.98Hz 1600x900 (0x60) 108.000MHz +HSync +VSync h: width 1600 start 1624 end 1704 total 1800 skew0 clock 60.00KHz v: height 900 start 901 end 904 total 1000 clock 60.00Hz 1280x1024 (0x61) 108.000MHz +HSync +VSync h: width 1280 start 1328 end 1440 total 1688 skew0 clock 63.98KHz v: height 1024 start 1025 end 1028 total 1066 clock 60.02Hz 1440x900 (0x62) 106.500MHz -HSync +VSync h: width 1440 start 1520 end 1672 total 1904 skew0 clock 55.93KHz v: height 900 start 903 end 909 total 934 clock 59.89Hz 1280x800 (0x63) 83.500MHz -HSync +VSync h: width 1280 start 1352 end 1480 total 1680 skew0 clock 49.70KHz v: height 800 start 803 end 809 total 831 clock 59.81Hz 1152x864 (0x64) 81.768MHz -HSync +VSync h: width 1152 start 1216 end 1336 total 1520 skew0 clock 53.79KHz v: height 864 start 867 end 871 total 897 clock 59.97Hz 1280x720 (0x65) 74.250MHz +HSync +VSync h: width 1280 start 1390 end 1430 total
[Bug 1934409] Re: Only one monitor showing in Color Corrections - System Settings Module
Been a while, but now that I'm on 21.10, colord is not picking up all devices once again - just one monitor and printer... andrew@desky:~$ sudo colormgr get-devices-by-kind display [sudo] password for andrew: Object Path: /org/freedesktop/ColorManager/devices/xrandr_LG_Electronics_MP59G_16843009_andrew_1000 Owner: andrew Created: March 18 2022, 12:32:29 AM Modified: March 18 2022, 12:32:29 AM Type: display Enabled: Yes Embedded: Yes Model: MP59G Vendor:LG Serial:16843009 Seat: seat0 Scope: temp Colorspace:rgb Device ID: xrandr-LG Electronics-MP59G-16843009 Profile 1: icc-0ce2e8ad3e9d95972c92b26c7cf1ff76 /var/lib/colord/icc/MP59G #1 2019-04-20 08-41 2.2 F-S XYZLUT+MTX.icc Profile 2: icc-47d27b769d969b5b00c90fa6a22b30db /home/andrew/.local/share/icc/edid-6f5d0bc1638b2166d7bc7cba7f413205.icc Profile 3: icc-cc0f880e5208bfe2b012688549fa1d31 /home/andrew/.local/share/icc/MP59G #2 2021-07-23 11-01 2.2 F-S XYZLUT+MTX.icc Profile 4: icc-275750a8cb6525973773ab3c4861e84e /home/andrew/.local/share/icc/edid-f211cb0460a11ad1896f3050a36f2712.icc Metadata: OutputEdidMd5=f211cb0460a11ad1896f3050a36f2712 Metadata: OutputPriority=primary Metadata: XRANDR_name=DisplayPort-0 Metadata: OwnerCmdline=/usr/bin/kded5 Reinstall colord and this is the result: andrew@desky:~$ sudo colormgr get-devices-by-kind display [sudo] password for andrew: Object Path: /org/freedesktop/ColorManager/devices/xrandr_DisplayPort_0_andrew_1000 Owner: andrew Created: March 18 2022, 01:06:41 AM Modified: March 18 2022, 01:06:41 AM Type: display Enabled: Yes Embedded: Yes Model: MP59G Vendor:LG Serial:16843009 Seat: seat0 Scope: temp Colorspace:rgb Device ID: xrandr-DisplayPort-0 Profile 1: icc-6cc2fc162f8d590624da325d5aecf601 /var/lib/colord/icc/MP59G #1 2021-07-23 11-58 2.2 F-S XYZLUT+MTX.icc Profile 2: icc-275750a8cb6525973773ab3c4861e84e /home/andrew/.local/share/icc/edid-f211cb0460a11ad1896f3050a36f2712.icc Profile 3: icc-cc0f880e5208bfe2b012688549fa1d31 /home/andrew/.local/share/icc/MP59G #2 2021-07-23 11-01 2.2 F-S XYZLUT+MTX.icc Metadata: OutputEdidMd5=f211cb0460a11ad1896f3050a36f2712 Metadata: OutputPriority=primary Metadata: XRANDR_name=DisplayPort-0 Metadata: OwnerCmdline=/usr/bin/kded5 Object Path: /org/freedesktop/ColorManager/devices/xrandr_DisplayPort_1_andrew_1000 Owner: andrew Created: March 18 2022, 01:06:41 AM Modified: March 18 2022, 01:06:41 AM Type: display Enabled: Yes Embedded: Yes Model: MP59G Vendor:LG Serial:16843009 Seat: seat0 Scope: temp Colorspace:rgb Device ID: xrandr-DisplayPort-1 Profile 1: icc-cc0f880e5208bfe2b012688549fa1d31 /home/andrew/.local/share/icc/MP59G #2 2021-07-23 11-01 2.2 F-S XYZLUT+MTX.icc Profile 2: icc-275750a8cb6525973773ab3c4861e84e /home/andrew/.local/share/icc/edid-f211cb0460a11ad1896f3050a36f2712.icc Metadata: OutputEdidMd5=f211cb0460a11ad1896f3050a36f2712 Metadata: OutputPriority=primary Metadata: XRANDR_name=DisplayPort-1 Metadata: OwnerCmdline=/usr/bin/kded5 Picks up both screens, looses the printer. Next reboot, right back at square one where colord only picks up one monitor and the printer until I reinstall colord, and once I do that I can see both monitors but not the printer... *SIGH* -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934409 Title: Only one monitor showing in Color Corrections - System Settings Module To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colord/+bug/1934409/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1934409] Re: Only one monitor showing in Color Corrections - System Settings Module
Well, colord no one tracks bugs (and I see lot's of ancient and very open bugs). Seen a couple that may or may not be similar, and the bugs go all the way back to 11.04 - so I guess I'm the only person in the entire world experiencing this... But in case not, this problem would have a downstream effect on other projects: gnome-color-manager (in my case it's pulled in by colord-kde). Perhaps it's a problem in libxrandr2? I'm not fully sure of the interrelations between the libraries for xrandr, colormgr, X, KDE, Gnome, etc... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934409 Title: Only one monitor showing in Color Corrections - System Settings Module To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colord/+bug/1934409/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1934409] Re: Only one monitor showing in Color Corrections - System Settings Module
Okay, if I do a reinstallion of colord, I can see both monitors and actually set the profile on the second screen. I lose the printer profile upon doing this. This works until next reboot and then everything reverts (only see one monitor and the printer color profiles). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934409 Title: Only one monitor showing in Color Corrections - System Settings Module To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colord/+bug/1934409/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1934409] Re: Only one monitor showing in Color Corrections - System Settings Module
>From system settings, I can see both monitors in Display configuration. >From command prompt, I can see both displays when I use xrandr. >From command prompt, I can only see one display when I use colormgr get- devices-by-kind display Did not have this issue with Kubuntu 20.10. My notebook, which hasn't been upgraded from 20.10 yet (I'll hold off) does not have this issue and it does show all display devices in Display Configuration, useing xrandr from command prompt, and colormgr from command prompt. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934409 Title: Only one monitor showing in Color Corrections - System Settings Module To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colord/+bug/1934409/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1934409] [NEW] Only one monitor showing in Color Corrections - System Settings Module
Public bug reported: I just made the switch to 21.04, and I've immediatly run into problem with color corrections. In the Color Correction - System settings Module, I can only see and apply a color profile to my first display on the first display port (DP0). My second display on the 2nd display Port (DP1) is not shown, so I'm unable to apply a color profile to make the two monitors look identical. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.04 Package: colord 1.4.5-3 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.11.0-22.23-generic 5.11.21 Uname: Linux 5.11.0-22-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu65.1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: KDE Date: Thu Jul 1 17:43:58 2021 InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-04-19 (804 days ago) InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 19.04 "Disco Dingo" - Release amd64 (20190416) SourcePackage: colord UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to hirsute on 2021-07-01 (0 days ago) ** Affects: colord (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug hirsute -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1934409 Title: Only one monitor showing in Color Corrections - System Settings Module To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/colord/+bug/1934409/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1901139] Re: No Intel HD sound 9th Gen Acer Swift 3 Notebook (possibly others)
This seems to be a duplicate bug - see 1864061 So the fix is to edit alsa-base.conf options snd_hda_intel dmic_detect=0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901139 Title: No Intel HD sound 9th Gen Acer Swift 3 Notebook (possibly others) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1901139/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1901139] Re: No Intel HD sound 9th Gen Acer Swift 3 Notebook (possibly others)
Updated Linux image 5.8.0-26 also not working. ** Description changed: Just upgraded from Kubuntu 20.04 to 20.10 to find no audio device detected. lsmod shows module loaded, but alsa/pulse/etc is not picking up the audio device. If I boot using the old kernel that was left behind, it works (5.4.0-52 from 20.04). It does not work with shipped - kernel (5.8.0-52) & does not work with kernel 5.9.1-050901 (the current + kernel (5.8.0-25) & does not work with kernel 5.9.1-050901 (the current unsigned kernel from mainline). lspci shows the device regardless of what I boot. lsmod also shows the driver loading, but I don't see the codec portion of the driver loading on the current and testing kernels. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10 Package: linux-image-generic 5.8.0.25.30 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-52.57-generic 5.4.65 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-52-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu50 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: - USERPID ACCESS COMMAND - /dev/snd/controlC0: andrew 1108 F pulseaudio - andrew 1112 F pipewire-media- - /dev/snd/seq:andrew 1107 F pipewire + USERPID ACCESS COMMAND + /dev/snd/controlC0: andrew 1108 F pulseaudio + andrew 1112 F pipewire-media- + /dev/snd/seq:andrew 1107 F pipewire CasperMD5CheckResult: skip CurrentDesktop: KDE Date: Fri Oct 23 00:59:27 2020 InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-11-16 (341 days ago) InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017) MachineType: Acer Swift SF315-52G ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-52-generic root=UUID=821af7d8-e605-4db1-aaef-f6d17905aeec ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: - linux-restricted-modules-5.4.0-52-generic N/A - linux-backports-modules-5.4.0-52-generic N/A - linux-firmware1.190 + linux-restricted-modules-5.4.0-52-generic N/A + linux-backports-modules-5.4.0-52-generic N/A + linux-firmware1.190 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to groovy on 2020-10-23 (0 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 12/21/2018 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: V1.08 dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string dmi.board.name: Erdinger_KL dmi.board.vendor: KBL dmi.board.version: V1.08 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Acer dmi.chassis.version: V1.08 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrV1.08:bd12/21/2018:svnAcer:pnSwiftSF315-52G:pvrV1.08:rvnKBL:rnErdinger_KL:rvrV1.08:cvnAcer:ct10:cvrV1.08: dmi.product.family: Swift 3 dmi.product.name: Swift SF315-52G dmi.product.sku: dmi.product.version: V1.08 dmi.sys.vendor: Acer -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901139 Title: No Intel HD sound 9th Gen Acer Swift 3 Notebook (possibly others) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1901139/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1901139] [NEW] No Intel HD sound 9th Gen Acer Swift 3 Notebook (possibly others)
Public bug reported: Just upgraded from Kubuntu 20.04 to 20.10 to find no audio device detected. lsmod shows module loaded, but alsa/pulse/etc is not picking up the audio device. If I boot using the old kernel that was left behind, it works (5.4.0-52 from 20.04). It does not work with shipped kernel (5.8.0-52) & does not work with kernel 5.9.1-050901 (the current unsigned kernel from mainline). lspci shows the device regardless of what I boot. lsmod also shows the driver loading, but I don't see the codec portion of the driver loading on the current and testing kernels. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.10 Package: linux-image-generic 5.8.0.25.30 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-52.57-generic 5.4.65 Uname: Linux 5.4.0-52-generic x86_64 NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu50 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: andrew 1108 F pulseaudio andrew 1112 F pipewire-media- /dev/snd/seq:andrew 1107 F pipewire CasperMD5CheckResult: skip CurrentDesktop: KDE Date: Fri Oct 23 00:59:27 2020 InstallationDate: Installed on 2019-11-16 (341 days ago) InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 19.10 "Eoan Ermine" - Release amd64 (20191017) MachineType: Acer Swift SF315-52G ProcFB: 0 i915drmfb ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.4.0-52-generic root=UUID=821af7d8-e605-4db1-aaef-f6d17905aeec ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 RelatedPackageVersions: linux-restricted-modules-5.4.0-52-generic N/A linux-backports-modules-5.4.0-52-generic N/A linux-firmware1.190 SourcePackage: linux UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to groovy on 2020-10-23 (0 days ago) dmi.bios.date: 12/21/2018 dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc. dmi.bios.version: V1.08 dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string dmi.board.name: Erdinger_KL dmi.board.vendor: KBL dmi.board.version: V1.08 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Acer dmi.chassis.version: V1.08 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvrV1.08:bd12/21/2018:svnAcer:pnSwiftSF315-52G:pvrV1.08:rvnKBL:rnErdinger_KL:rvrV1.08:cvnAcer:ct10:cvrV1.08: dmi.product.family: Swift 3 dmi.product.name: Swift SF315-52G dmi.product.sku: dmi.product.version: V1.08 dmi.sys.vendor: Acer ** Affects: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug groovy -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1901139 Title: No Intel HD sound 9th Gen Acer Swift 3 Notebook (possibly others) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1901139/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1890815] Re: vainfo requires a nvidia sofile not in repositories
Well, still brokenOr rather a key package is MIA. Trying to configuring up my new HTPC and this was one of the major headaches I was having with getting the video card operating properly. But thanks to Patola, I pulled the missing package (vdpau-va-driver_0.7.4-7_amd64.deb) from Debian - yes everything is functioning properly now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890815 Title: vainfo requires a nvidia sofile not in repositories To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libva-utils/+bug/1890815/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1869799] Re: no sound driver since 5.3.0.42 kernel
Notified of update today, and noticed one of the updates was for Kernel Image 5.3.0-46. So I removed the testdsp SMP kernel today and installed 5.3.0-46 proper kernel: Intel HDA driver not loading (so dummy output). So I'm back to workaround from 12. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869799 Title: no sound driver since 5.3.0.42 kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1869799/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1869799] Re: no sound driver since 5.3.0.42 kernel
I've just recently run into this on my Acer Swift 5 - works on 5.3.0.40, doesn't work on 5.3.0.42 or 5.3.0.45. The work around works, as does not using the work around with patched kernel 5.3.0.46 provided here. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1869799 Title: no sound driver since 5.3.0.42 kernel To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1869799/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1788249] Re: Can'tinstall 'kubutnu-desktop' from 16.04LTS to 18.04LTS
This can be closed - totally my fault. I had several locked pacakages (forgot about them) and was using a couple PPA's (Padoka's Stable MESA PPA and Kubuntu backports). Was able to resolve it all with Aptitude (just took a few hours) System is fully upgraded now that I fixed the locked packages and unmish-mashed MESA. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788249 Title: Can'tinstall 'kubutnu-desktop' from 16.04LTS to 18.04LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1788249/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1788249] [NEW] Can'tinstall 'kubutnu-desktop' from 16.04LTS to 18.04LTS
Public bug reported: I got the notice a few days ago the upgrade was available, held off to today due to time availability. I ran the upgrade from konsole: *** "do-release-upgrade -m desktop -f DistUpgradeViewKDE" I did note the following errors: QInotifyFileSystemWatcherEngine::addPaths: inotify_add_watch failed: No such file or directory QFileSystemWatcher: failed to add paths: /home/andrew/.config/ibus/bus Bus::open: Can not get ibus-daemon's address. IBusInputContext::createInputContext: no connection to ibus-daemon Not sure what further information is needed, just making the report as I get ready to debug. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04 Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:16.04.25 Uname: Linux 4.15.4-041504-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.18 Architecture: amd64 CrashDB: ubuntu CurrentDesktop: KDE Date: Tue Aug 21 10:52:02 2018 InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-02-23 (909 days ago) InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 15.10 "Wily Werewolf" - Release amd64 (20151021) PackageArchitecture: all SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to xenial on 2018-08-21 (0 days ago) VarLogDistupgradeTermlog: ** Affects: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug dist-upgrade third-party-packages xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1788249 Title: Can'tinstall 'kubutnu-desktop' from 16.04LTS to 18.04LTS To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/1788249/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1577074] Re: [HP Pavilion 15] Intermittent black screens
It was a Pavilion 15-ab188ca. And no I can't test, computer has been permanently retired (stripped down and parted out) when the battery charge circuit failed and could no longer properly detect a fully charged battery (don't want or need my mom using a fire hazard). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577074 Title: [HP Pavilion 15] Intermittent black screens To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu/+bug/1577074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1577074] Re: [HP Pavilion 15] Intermittent black screens
I looked at the release notes and it appears amdgpu-pro only supports discrete/dedicated graphics. I don't see any APU GPU based core listed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577074 Title: [HP Pavilion 15] Intermittent black screens To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu/+bug/1577074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1577074] Re: [HP Pavilion 15] Intermittent black screens
Oh, BTW, to be ry clear - I didn't provide (or do) any work on this experimental (always consider it experimental) kernel - just the link to it. I only found it through a Phoronix article and used it to test. Thank M-bab for his hard work. :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577074 Title: [HP Pavilion 15] Intermittent black screens To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu/+bug/1577074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1577074] Re: [HP Pavilion 15] Intermittent black screens
I just checked on Phoronix, AMD's DC stack has not been accepted for kernel 4.13 - so very unlikely to make it into Ubuntu 17.10. Maybe AMD steps on it they get it into kernel 4.14 at the earliest. The basic (overly simplistic) problem is how it's coded and would make it a total nightmare for the kernel dev's to maintain. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577074 Title: [HP Pavilion 15] Intermittent black screens To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu/+bug/1577074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1577074] Re: [HP Pavilion 15] Intermittent black screens
Whoa, hold up - it *may not* be. The kernel main line developers have rejected the code for various reasons. Untill it's acepted mainline, it's not a part of the kernel. Read the readme on the github site. AMD has to make changes to DC (formerly known as DAL) to be accepted. So anyone using the kernel I pointed out is just beta testers for the time being. Glad it does work for you. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577074 Title: [HP Pavilion 15] Intermittent black screens To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu/+bug/1577074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1577074] Re: [HP Pavilion 15] Intermittent black screens
Well, I'm a bit sorry I only filed the bug and haven't done anything else except follow it (in hopes I'll be able to redo the system when Windows no longer cuts the mustard on it and it returns to my possession). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577074 Title: [HP Pavilion 15] Intermittent black screens To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu/+bug/1577074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1577074] Re: [HP Pavilion 15] Intermittent black screens
I was lucky and was able to pawn the computer off to another family member with Windows installed (and I got myself an i3 based Dell that works fine). That said, I had the computer back a month ago (to clean out the heat sink and remove a virus - natch) and looked into it with an external USB HDD. Nope, hasn't changed - BUT I tried a kernel with DAL (DC) enabled - worked fine with that kernel. So hopfully AMD gets there act together and make the needed changes to get it mainlined. Given that some Carrizo based systems work fine with out DC/DAL support, I'm betting it's a BIOS bug with the power settings of the GPU. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577074 Title: [HP Pavilion 15] Intermittent black screens To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu/+bug/1577074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1577074] Re: [HP Pavilion 15] Intermittent black screens
Sorry, if you wish to try I breifly tested with this kernel: https://github.com/M-Bab/linux-kernel-amdgpu-binaries -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577074 Title: [HP Pavilion 15] Intermittent black screens To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu/+bug/1577074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1577074] Re: AMDGPU driver problems on "Carrizo" APU
I'm sure it will - the kernel in every release receives periodic updates. But 4.6 is only a "candidate release" - a technical preview if you will while bugs and such are fully baked out of the pie for final release. You'll see one of the 4.5 kernels first - hopefully with a fix, but it's also possible that a fix might not get backported. We know there was a change, but what the change hasn't been pin pointed exactly - makes it a bit harder for the Dev/packager to backport a fix since the exact issue with the driver wasn't pinned down. Then again, I suppose they could just backport the whole driver from 4.6g, but that might lead into other bug's or issues... I'm sure they'll try to figure it out. Aside - I don't have random black screens on the Windows 10 side. I do have (multiple) other AMD graphics drivers problems on that side though... But let's not continue this discussion - this is supposed to be a bug report and I'm sure the packagers/maintainers/Dev's would rather see discussions relevant to the filed bug. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577074 Title: AMDGPU driver problems on "Carrizo" APU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu/+bug/1577074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1577074] Re: AMDGPU driver problems on "Carrizo" APU
I was using the closed fglrx (a.k.a. Crimson 15.12) on Kubuntu 15.10 (the latest updates from the regular repository - not the ones form the various PPA's) and that worked fine for me. For 16.04 Wily, the kernel packages from http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel- ppa/mainline/v4.6-rc6-wily have newer open source AMDgpu kernel drivers and those seem to work fine on the A10-8700P. Give that Kernel (or the newer RC7 one) a shot. Just a note for Jakedp (it's another unrelated bug and really doesn't apply to this bug - so this can be ignored so far as the AMDgpu bug report) - If we have the same laptop (and I believe we do), you'll also have the same Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless adapter - there's another bug that might affect you regarding that driver's antenna selection... The fix is projected to be included in the Kernel 4.7 by the developer. I was hoping it might have got backported into the 4.6 release candidates - but it hasn't. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577074 Title: AMDGPU driver problems on "Carrizo" APU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu/+bug/1577074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1577074] Re: AMDGPU driver problems on "Carrizo" APU
Been investigating a wireless problem that lead me to install Kernel 4.6-RC6 from PPA - this Kernel seems to fix this bug (as haven't run into this issue with the release candidate kernel). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577074 Title: AMDGPU driver problems on "Carrizo" APU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu/+bug/1577074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1577074] Re: AMDGPU driver problems on "Carrizo" APU
** Package changed: ubuntu => xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577074 Title: AMDGPU driver problems on "Carrizo" APU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xserver-xorg-video-amdgpu/+bug/1577074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1577074] Re: AMDGPU driver problems on "Carrizo" APU
I believe the bug is in the current open DRI amdgpu display driver. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577074 Title: AMDGPU driver problems on "Carrizo" APU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1577074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1577074] [NEW] AMDGPU driver problems on "Carrizo" APU
Public bug reported: Summery: I'm having a hard time tracing this down. I updated to Kubuntu 16.04 (from Kubuntu 15.10 - that was using the Linux Crimson 15.12 driver) a couple days ago on my notebook (HP Pavilion, A10-8700P APU), and ever since I've been having random black screens. I started debugging the driver, then thought it might be a DPMS issue (it's not - I have DPMS fully disabled currently), and now I'm back to debugging the driver. I don't have any remnants of the former closed Crimson display driver and never had an xorg.conf file (I made a small one that I'm using at the moment consisting of only a server layout to ensure screen savers, DPMS, etc are all off). The Black screen can happen any time from the login screen until hours later. I can ssh into the system to shut it down. And just discovered that if I unplug the system from it's power brick, I can close the lid - the system will goto sleep. When I flip the screen back up, the system wakes up and the screen works again for 1-2 minutes. I don't see any errors in the log files (well, outside some nasty looking ACAPI errors in dmesg). Steps to reproduce: boot system and use normally or simply leave system alone. Blank screen will happen any time after x comes up. Expected results: Screen doesn't blank unless a screen saver or power saver kicks in. System info: Purchased Dec 2015 (build date from BIOS - Aug 2015), HP Pavilion 15" notebook, AMD A10-8700P "Carrizo", 16GB RAM, 960GB SSD ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1577074 Title: AMDGPU driver problems on "Carrizo" APU To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1577074/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1129409] Re: Nvidia and AMD graphics drivers should indicate whether they provide libcuda.so.1, libOpenCL.so.1, etc.
Sorry for pointing that out - I just want to see this fixed right the first time -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1129409 Title: Nvidia and AMD graphics drivers should indicate whether they provide libcuda.so.1, libOpenCL.so.1, etc. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/1129409/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1129409] Re: Nvidia and AMD graphics drivers should indicate whether they provide libcuda.so.1, libOpenCL.so.1, etc.
Well, in respect to what I see in the nVidia drivers (nvidia-opencl- icd-331-updates) and in the AMD drivers, shouldn't there be an enhances line (Enhances libopencl1) - the AMD driver is afterall providing enhancements, but in it's base package as opposed to a seperate opencl pacakge... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1129409 Title: Nvidia and AMD graphics drivers should indicate whether they provide libcuda.so.1, libOpenCL.so.1, etc. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/1129409/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1129409] Re: Nvidia and AMD graphics drivers should indicate whether they provide libcuda.so.1, libOpenCL.so.1, etc.
Actually looking at my nVidia equipped system, the nVidia packages installed on it, and my AMD system and the AMD packages installed on it right now... Thinking about it, shouldn't the AMD driver depend on ocl- icd-libopencl1 package? Should the AMD pacakge be broken up into seperate packages like the nVidia one (which would enable quicker bug and/or updates to portions of it and such). Just food for thought. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1129409 Title: Nvidia and AMD graphics drivers should indicate whether they provide libcuda.so.1, libOpenCL.so.1, etc. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/1129409/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1376587] Re: wine and fglrx packages are mutually exclusive
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1129409 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1129409 Sadly, for the moment anyone who wishes to install both packages (which will be everyone with an AMD card wishing to use the closed Catalyst driver and Wine) will have to be a power user and use a work around - that is edit the control file in the fglrx-core package of there choice and install the edited package manually. Alberto Milone is working on it (see Bug #1129409), but it's only ranked a medium sensitivity. Now it is listed that the fix is in progress - so a fix is coming at some point. :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1376587 Title: wine and fglrx packages are mutually exclusive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.6/+bug/1376587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1376587] Re: wine and fglrx packages are mutually exclusive
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1129409 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1129409 Hi Jack, The bug isn't in the Wine package's (at least, not any more), the show stopper for getting Wine working with Catalyst is being caused by a fight between ocl-icd-libopencl1 packages and the fglrx-core and/or fglrx-updates-core Catalyst packages in the repo's as well as on AMD's website at present time (from here on in I'll just refer to fglrx-core - it applies tot he fglrx-updaes-core packages as well). The basic problem is that the AMD fglrx-core won't install ocl-icd- libopencl1 because both packages provide the virtual package libopencl1 (NOTE: the package ocl-icd-libopencl doesn't provide a libOpenCL.so file as I originally feared however) - do to this, ocl-icd-libopencl1 won't install with out removing the fglrx-core because it too provides a virtual libopencl1 package. So the package manager ends up thinking that if you Want Wine, to resolve the conflicts it has to remove the fglrx-core packags. Now, I could put the fixed packages into a PPA, except that would leave some OpenCL bugs in place (I'm not a package maintainer, and aside from modifying the control file in the fglrx-core packages (that's to per terje's earlier post), I'm not really sure how to also bundle in he OpenCL fixes into the package. I suppose I could make a corrections package from scratch for the OpenCL corrections, but again, I'm not sure how to do that as I've never done that before. Besides (food for thought), I have one other problem putting out corrected package in a PPAs. Does ocl-icd-libopencl actually provide libopencl1 support directly like the AMD fglrx-core packages do, or is ocl-icd-libopencl providing enhancements to libopenCL1? Which package should be creating the libopenCL1 virtual package? Thats the question, and the main reason why I don't want to make a PPA. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1376587 Title: wine and fglrx packages are mutually exclusive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.6/+bug/1376587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1129409] Re: Nvidia and AMD graphics drivers should indicate whether they provide libcuda.so.1, libOpenCL.so.1, etc.
I posted on bug # 1376587... I fixed a couple bugs regarding the AMD Catalyst drivers... Okay, so the replaces line needs to change to this: Enhances: libopencl1 Replaces: fglrx-driver-core Provides: fglrx-driver-core, opencl-icd, amd-opencl-icd Fresh install, I had to get rid of libopencl1 in the repalces line as it causes a fight between packages.. I added the enhances line becasue, well, it enhances OpenCL with GPGPU support. This allow's both the updates driver from the repo's and the drivers form AMD's website to install with wine gracefully. Why the Enhances line - I noticed that OpenCL wasn't working on my system. SO a few more changes was in order: In /usr/lib I create thed following symlink: libOpenCL.so and pointed it at libOpenCL.so.1 Then I created two more symlinks for completness: libOpenCL.so.1.1 and libOpenCL.so.1.2 and both of those pointed to libOpenCL.so (I did this incase AMD or someone decides that proviced libOpenCL.so.1 file name should be corrected to libOpenCL.so). I then did the same in /usr/lib32 Then I went into /etc/OpenCL/venders and coped amdocl64.icd in the same dir but called it amdocl32.icd I edited that file, and changed libamdocl64.so to libamdocl32.so Next, in /etc/ld.so.conf.d I made a file called opencl-vender-amd.conf and add the line: /etc/OpenCL/venders I then ran ldconfig to finalise the settings. Wine works fine as well as GPGPU accelerated OpenCL (tested with BOINC). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1129409 Title: Nvidia and AMD graphics drivers should indicate whether they provide libcuda.so.1, libOpenCL.so.1, etc. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boinc/+bug/1129409/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1376587] Re: wine and fglrx packages are mutually exclusive
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1129409 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1129409 Boo-YA! Got it. AND (!!! not fully related, but getting this working also lead into fixing another problem), I got OpenCL working with out haveing to resort to installing (or partialy installing the AMD APP SDK... Okay, so the replaces line needs to change to this: Replaces: fglrx-driver-core (Yes, that right, get rid of libopenCL1 - it causes a fight between packages) Next, add this line after the depends line: Enhances: libopencl1 Okay, so now that will allow wine to work on a freshly installed system. Want OpenCL (GPGPU) working?? Keep reading: In /usr/lib create the following symlink: libOpenCL.so and point it at libOpenCL.so.1 Then create two more symlinks for completness: libOpenCL.so.1.1 and libOpenCL.so.1.2 Both will point to libOpenCL.so (I did this incase AMD or someone decides that proviced libOpenCL.so.1 file name should be corrected to libOpenCL.so).. Now, repeat the above steps, but change to /usr/lib32 Next, go to /etc/OpenCL/venders and you'll see a file called amdocl64.icd Make a copy of it in the same dir called amdocl32.icd Edit that file, and change libamdocl64.so to libamdocl32.so Next, in /etc/ld.so.conf.d make a file called opencl-vender-amd.conf and add the line: /etc/OpenCL/venders Run ldconfig and your all set - Wine will install and work as wanted and you'll have the bonus of having working OpenCL support. Hope this is of help. Works with the updates drivers from the repo's and it also works on AMD's DEB packages from AMD's website. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1376587 Title: wine and fglrx packages are mutually exclusive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.6/+bug/1376587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1376587] Re: wine and fglrx packages are mutually exclusive
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1129409 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1129409 Uhh, doesn't that solution induce another issue? I'm looking at it: if I read the solution right and looking at what wine installed, libOpenCL1.so.1 that is provided by the AMD Catalyst driver will be over written by the one provided by ocl-icd-libopencl1. Won't that break GPU accelerated opencl support??? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1376587 Title: wine and fglrx packages are mutually exclusive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.6/+bug/1376587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1376587] Re: wine and fglrx packages are mutually exclusive
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1129409 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1129409 Okay, more studying of what was going on - I'd like to modify the above procedure. The provides line I belive should look like this: Provides: fglrx-driver-core, opencl-icd, amd-opencl-icd -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1376587 Title: wine and fglrx packages are mutually exclusive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.6/+bug/1376587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1376587] Re: wine and fglrx packages are mutually exclusive
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1129409 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1129409 Bla, after all that work on the updated drivers in the repository, and working on the drivers from AMD's site (which are nice and zippy), Wine *STILL* insists on removing the AMD drivers and installing icl-icd- libopencl1... I'm gonna keep at it untill this works... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1376587 Title: wine and fglrx packages are mutually exclusive To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine1.6/+bug/1376587/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1182677] Re: Alternative OpenGL lib's not updated when using closed drivers
Okay, I added a whole pile of debugging statments into it, and kept running it as root - it is picking up the parameter configure, but the files aren't updating. So next I tried executing a direct command from the postinst file, to explicitly update the i386 file (as root): update- alternatives --force --install /etc/ld.so.conf.d/i386-linux-gnu_GL.conf i386-linux-gnu_gl_conf /usr/lib/nvidia-313-updates/alt_ld.so.conf 9702 The result was /etc/ld.so.conf.d/i386-linux-gnu_GL.conf updated. So, now I'm scratching my head - why does it work from a command line but it will not work from inside the script (it was a cut and paste with one minor change (so it would execute as root). Well, I'm confused enough and think it's time I hit the sack. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182677 Title: Alternative OpenGL lib's not updated when using closed drivers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1182677/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1182677] [NEW] Alternative OpenGL lib's not updated when using closed drivers
Public bug reported: I have two computers, both are now running run Kubuntu 13.04 x86-64 editions (the desktop also has Ubuntu Studio 13.04 x86-64), both use closed source drivers (laptop has nVidia 9600M GS adapter, desktop has AMD Radeon HD 6770). Before upgrading, both system's and three *buntu's ran fine with all OpenGL lib's being pointed to correctly. After upgrading, the video library paths got cleared leaving me with virtually all my wine games seg faulting as well as native Linux games and programs (Skype 4.1, Doom 3, Quake Arena, etc). The problem really highlights it's self if the software wants to use OpenGL drivers. I found a temperary fix by adding the video paths to these files: /etc/ld.so.conf.d/i386-linux-gnu_GL.conf : /usr/lib32/fglrx (On the desktop) /usr/lib32/nvidia-313-updates (On the laptop) /etc/ld.so.conf.d/x86_64-linux-gnu_GL.conf : /usr/lib/fglrx #(On the desktop) /usr/lib/nvidia-313-updates (On the laptop) I tried updating the alternatives before I edited these files, and I just got a message back on the terminal saying there were no alternative's to configure. This workaround works, but will need to be changed if these paths change at any time. Now this shouldn't pose a problem for FireGL Catalyst drivers, but it will pose problems for the nVidia drivers since the driver series and type (ie 313 series Updates driver) is noted in the directory. After these two simple mod's, all my OpenGL programs (both native 64-bit and 32-bit Linux apps, and Wine programs) worked flawlessly. This does not effect the open source nVidia and AMD drivers, the issue only shows up when using the closed nVidia and AMD binary blob's on *buntu 13.04. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182677 Title: Alternative OpenGL lib's not updated when using closed drivers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1182677/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1182677] Re: Alternative OpenGL lib's not updated when using closed drivers
sorry I didn't list a specific package, it's cause I'm not sure if it's the nVidia/AMD packages, or related to another package. I did deinstall/reinstall the video drivers numerous times over the weekend (first thought was drivers didn't install properly, then started thinking bug in the actual drivers, and then a realization the the issue when I looked at the library paths with ldconfig), and went so far as to try the AMD driver from there web site and removed it again, as well as made use of Neuvoux and Gallium3D drivers (I didn't stick with open drivers as they don't meet my needs). I spent hours debugging wine before I realized what was happening and how it related to Wine, and several programs. I then spent several hours testing and coming up with the pesudo fix posted above. I am not sure if this effects the 32 bit editions, and can only fully confirm this is effecting Kubuntu and Ubuntu Studio 13.04 (earlier releases are fine). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182677 Title: Alternative OpenGL lib's not updated when using closed drivers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1182677/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1182677] Re: Alternative OpenGL lib's not updated when using closed drivers
Starting my tracing... But I think the bug is in a script of a package that uses libc-bin, and it isn't a bug in libc-bin. ** Package changed: ubuntu = eglibc (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182677 Title: Alternative OpenGL lib's not updated when using closed drivers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/1182677/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1182677] Re: Alternative OpenGL lib's not updated when using closed drivers
Sorry, this is not a libc-bin bug... But looking through the postinst scripts for the package's for both the ATI and nVidia drivers, it appears that for some reason when the script is executed, the script's in the 64-bit packages are skipping neumerous update-alternative lines, hence ldconfig isn't setting up the directories. So it appears to be the packages affected are fglrx, fglrx-updates, nvidia-173, nvidia-304, nvidia-310, nvidia-313-updates, and possibly others. ** Package changed: eglibc (Ubuntu) = ubuntu -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182677 Title: Alternative OpenGL lib's not updated when using closed drivers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1182677/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1182677] Re: Alternative OpenGL lib's not updated when using closed drivers
I know, this is taking me a while - I'm not a script kitty or a programmer, so I'm not the swiftest at picking out on what's happening - it's study-study, and rip appart and slowly nit pick my way through the scripts while I'm jugling other tasks). ;-) At any rate, with the AMD fglrx-updates driver, it looks like when the postinst script executes $1 is not equaling configure on line 93. --* QUOTE: if [ $1 = configure ]; then *-- So the updates in the if statment aren't being applied to the system. With the nvidia-313-updates driver, it looks like when the postinst script executes, case $1 is not configure on line 108 and 109 --* QUOTE: case $1 in configure) *-- So once again the updates aren't being applied to the system. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182677 Title: Alternative OpenGL lib's not updated when using closed drivers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/1182677/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1182677] Re: Alternative OpenGL lib's not updated when using closed drivers
Given that dpkg is passing a parameter ($1) onto the scripts, I beleive the target package is dpkg. ** Package changed: ubuntu = dpkg (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182677 Title: Alternative OpenGL lib's not updated when using closed drivers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1182677/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1182677] Re: Alternative OpenGL lib's not updated when using closed drivers
Better more effective work around - extract the postinst files from the appropriate deb files and then execute them as root: **@:~/temp$ ./postinst configure That got it! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182677 Title: Alternative OpenGL lib's not updated when using closed drivers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1182677/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 1182677] Re: Alternative OpenGL lib's not updated when using closed drivers
Err, no it didn't - not on my Laptop or Ubuntu Studio build (forgot to remove the lines from the ld.so.conf files). Command line parameters (in this case configure) are not being passed into the scripts. I really hope this isn't affecting other packages or distro's. :-( -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182677 Title: Alternative OpenGL lib's not updated when using closed drivers To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/dpkg/+bug/1182677/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 817181] Re: does not indicate foreign architecture when mentioning removal of non-host architecture packages
Well, Aptitude can't tell the difference between the architectures - so it's possible the packages may not have need to be removed. I had the same problem which aptitude wanted to blow away practically my entire system - it wanted to remove X and KDE, and everything that relied on them, not the i386 versions of anything, but the actual AMD64 ones I need and use daily - when I did the distribution upgrade a few weeks ago and received notice of my first updates a few days later... It took me a few hours to get that all sorted with out blowing away my system. But given this bug and bug 831768, I feel that Aptitude in it's current state can be a very dangerous tool to use to use on a daily basis, which is bad in my case as I use it because I find it's clean, easy, and very powerful tool that keeps my system lean and mean. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/817181 Title: does not indicate foreign architecture when mentioning removal of non- host architecture packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/817181/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 780720] [NEW] Network Manager (Plasma Widget) - won't auto-connect in all cases
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: plasma-widget-networkmanagement I recently upgraded my router to a dual band one due to the heavy proliferation of single band wireless networks in my apartment building. I configured up the router and my Vostro accordingly, however, no matter how I configure network manager, it will never-ever reconnect automatic to any router or access point on 5Ghz band unless I explicitly click on it (I have checked the settings, it is set to auto-connect). It will auto-connect to any network that's on a 2.4Ghz band. I've checked this behaviour against 5 networks, same problem in all cases. I'm not sure where the failure is, but I am confused as to why any portion of the network manager would treat an access point operating on the 5Ghz band any differently from an access point operating in the 2.4ghz band with auto-connecting. I would expect network manager to auto-connect to any network that configured to auto-connect to, regardless of the band it's using. What happens is it will automatically connect to all 2.4Ghz networks, but all 5Ghz networks I have to manually select the network to connect to every time (I have been able to replicate this on 5 networks). I'm running Kubuntu: andrew@lappyiii:~$ lsb_release -rd Description:Ubuntu 11.04 Release:11.04 andrew@lappyiii:~$ ** Affects: plasma-widget-networkmanagement (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to plasma-widget-networkmanagement in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/780720 Title: Network Manager (Plasma Widget) - won't auto-connect in all cases -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572777] Re: NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless
Hmm, looking back at some of the earlier posts, maybe it's not. :-( -- NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572777] Re: NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless
It seems to be fixed in Maveric - I hope that means this will hit the backports for Lucid users. -- NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572777] Re: NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless
Well, I'm not a developer here so I can't bump the severity. When I attempted to compile wpasupplicant and replace the packed one, I couldn't connect to any network - after fighting for an hour, I just got lazy and did the port from sid (and that did work for me at least a few others)... I'm looking at the logs, and it's for sure wpasupplicant and the wl driver competeing with eachother causing the wpa connection failures. But why, I don't know... I'm still trying to figure that out. For configurations, who's using what encryption protocalls? My router is set to use AES only encryption, and the other routers I connect to are WEP (don't ask, I don't configure peoples networks, I just use when needed). Might present problems if your router/access point can use both tkip and AES, and might cause more bugs with the router/access point can also do both WPA WPA2 at the same time. -- NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572777] Re: NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless
Go to to Debain Packages Organization and manually download (watch your arcitecture - i386 for 32-bit installs, AMD64 for 64-bit installs, etc, etc - do not use ia64 for standard 64bit installes - that specifically for the Intel Itanium CPU will cause very large problems/headaches) wpasupplicant (here: http://packages.debian.org/sid/wpasupplicant ), libpcsclite1 (here: http://packages.debian.org/sid/libpcsclite1 ) libssl0.9.8 (here: http://packages.debian.org/sid/libssl0.9.8). Once all three are downloaded, install the two library packages first with kpackagekit (for kubuntu - use gdebi for Ubuntu) then wpasupplicant. When done, reboot you should have working wireless (post if not). -- NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572777] Re: NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless
Thanks Nils - I did what you said but that just really upset network manager for me. But that gave me an idea, and I ended up pulling in wpasuppicant form Debian Sid (along with libssl0.9.8 and libpcslite1) - that fixed it up for me. -- NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572777] Re: NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless
So far, no issues with me my Debain Sid ported wpasupplicant libriaries - worked out of the box, no other work beyond installing the debs was required. I hope the guys with Intel WiFi chips suffering the same problem try both fixes out and that one of these fixes will help them. If neither of these fixes can help those guys out, then the bug is only partly solved. However I'm in 100% agreement that this should be marked a critical bug. -- NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572777] Re: NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless
It doesn't help me at all. Before anyoen asks, I haven't gotten around to compileing wpasupplicant or network manager - I'm in the middle of a reno that's dominating my time right now. Hope to get on it this weekend. -- NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572777] Re: NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless
Hi Rick - are you using the closed wl driver or the open B43 driver (for further confirmation of other drivers the bug is effecting)? -- NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572777] Re: NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless
Okay. So far just tthe Intel 5300 and the closed Broadcom STA drivers seem to be effected (at least as reported in this bug so far). -- NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572777] Re: NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless
Okay, I'm comfortable this is not a duplicate of 496093 - I'm using the wl Broadcom Hybird STA driver. Last night I downloaded the driver directly from Broadcom, compiled it and replaced the one in my kernel - no change in establishing connection (I initally tried using the packaged version avalible, but I noticed that it compiles with errors). I also downgraded wpa_suppicant to the one in Karmac - again, no chage. So tonight I'll compile wpa_supplicant networkmanager from source and see where I end up. Zarama - is there any differances between the configuration of your home network and office (ie: is one using WEP security and the other WPA?). -- NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572777] Re: NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless
Hmmm... Well, I see a couple of things to go on right now. I haven't tried unsecured or WEP based encrypted access points like Steve has - I'll dig out my old back up router and configure it up as a non- protected access point as well as a WEP encrypted one this weekend to check those ends as that would be a clear indicator of a problem with the wl driver. I'll stick to my original game plan and self compile wpa_supplicant and networkmanager and see if I can get some debugging out put from them. My worry is it doesn't appear to be a Broadcom driver problem since there is someone with an Intel based wireless card reporting the same problem here. I know there is also a ton of posts in the ubuntu forms for serveral differant manufacturers of wireless cards doing this exact same thing. Can everyone dig through there logs and post them - be much easier for all of us to at least narrow down which package is failing for us all. -- NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572777] Re: NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 575677 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575677 This bug is not a duplicate of bug 572777 - I can see all the access points around my computer, I'm just unable to connect to them. -- NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572777] Re: NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 575677 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575677 Err, sorry - this bug is not a duplicate of bug 575677 - I can see all the access points around my computer, I'm just unable to connect to them. -- NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 496093] Re: [lucid] rt2860 frequently fails to connect to mixed mode WPA/WPA2 secured wireless networks
Before I mark a bug I reported on Friday a duplicate - is this bug specific to a problem with the RaLink drivers or is this a bug in wpa_supplicant? The more read, the more I think this bug report is specific to a problem in the RaLink driver - which does not effect me as I'm not using it. However, that said, I'm having the identical problem otherwise (my bug is 572777). -- [lucid] rt2860 frequently fails to connect to mixed mode WPA/WPA2 secured wireless networks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/496093 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572777] Re: NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless
Still researching and reading - if this is a duplicate bug, then it's possibly a duplicate of 496093. The threads mostly around RaLink drivers, but I've seen a few postings from people with Intel wireless and Broadcom wireless based cards having the same issue. Looking at my log, I see the same Association request to the driver failed that started that bug. Still reading the messages as there is lot's of posts. The worry here is that most of the posts are focused on the Ralink driver - not wpa_supplicant, and only a couple of brief messages of affects me to from a couple of people with other wireless - if that's bug is only specifically for the RaLink driver, then this bug report is not a duplicate of that issue. -- NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572777] Re: NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless
I'm agreeing with a few more people and think it's more probable to be a bug in wpa_supplicant. plasma_widget_manager doesn't work, nor does wicd when I eliminate NetworkManager altogether. -- NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572777] Re: NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless
Full log attached... ** Attachment added: Debugging output... http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47838476/bug.txt -- NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191889] Re: [MASTER] [WORKAROUND] Offline Mode feature fails to detect proper online state for networks that are managed outside of network manager.
Read through this, and I'm really confused Is this bug a cause or an effect for bug a bug I reported on Friday - bug # 572777 reported here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/572777 I had no problems with 9.04, and upgrading to 9.10, but my upgrade to 10.04 (Lucid) has left me with non-functional wireless. I see a ton of time outs, then messages refer to a prompt where I have to re-input my WPA key. I also see a reference to this bug in my syslog. But for me, my wireless is not connecting at all...The reading of this bug is various connections are already established, but various other pieces of software - esp. Firefox - think the connection is not established and starting off in offline mode. I don't ever remembering having that issue at any point, and I personally don't believe the problems are related... -- [MASTER] [WORKAROUND] Offline Mode feature fails to detect proper online state for networks that are managed outside of network manager. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191889 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191889] Re: [MASTER] [WORKAROUND] Offline Mode feature fails to detect proper online state for networks that are managed outside of network manager.
Read through this, and I'm really confused on what this bug is effecting I'm tryign to determine if this bug might be cause or an effect for bug a bug I reported on Friday - bug # 572777 reported here https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/572777 I had no problems with 9.04, and upgrading to 9.10, but my upgrade to 10.04 (Lucid) has left me with non-functional wireless. I see a ton of time outs, then messages refer to a prompt where I have to re-input my WPA key. I also see a reference to this bug in my syslog. But for me, my wireless is not connecting at all...The reading of this bug is various connections are already established, but various other pieces of software - esp. Firefox - think the connection is not established and starting off in offline mode. I don't ever remembering having that issue at any point, and I personally don't believe the problems are related... -- [MASTER] [WORKAROUND] Offline Mode feature fails to detect proper online state for networks that are managed outside of network manager. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191889 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 414324] Re: [karmic] Wireless Once disconnected knetworkmanager prompts with empty password field
Possibly bug # 572777 is a duplicate of this bug. When i upgraded form 9.10 to 10.04 I was using knetworkmanager - on a wired connection I removed it and tried plasma-widget-networkmanagement and had the same result with the screen prompt. Don't have a syslog to attach because I'm using ME-II, but my syslog looks the same with either front end, and the png attached here is the exact same box that constantly pop's up when tryign to establish connection. On my end, it does have the password however as the network is known. But network manager attempts to connect and then times out, then I get the prompt again and the whole cycle starts all over. -- [karmic] Wireless Once disconnected knetworkmanager prompts with empty password field https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/414324 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to plasma-widget-networkmanagement in ubuntu. -- kubuntu-bugs mailing list kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kubuntu-bugs
[Bug 572777] [NEW] NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless
Public bug reported: I have a Vostro 1720 notebook running Kubuntu 10.04 with a Broadcom 4322 wireless adapter. It's using the Broadcom STA driver. I haven't had any issues in the past with my setup with 9.04 (Jaunty) or 9.10 (Karmac), but but with the recent switch to the release of 10.04 (Lucid) my wireless has pretty much quit working (so the ugly blue network wire is now a necessity). I've managed to get it to connect twice for short periods of time. I'm not sure if the problem is with NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant, but Network manager keeps asking me for the passphrase when I'm connecting to my access point. I also see a ton of time out error's in my syslog. One other user reported having the same problems in the Ubuntu forums here: http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=9094575. He's using an Intel based wireless adapter and Kubuntu 10.04. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- NetworkManager or wpa_supplicant timing out when connecting wireless https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/572777 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194760] Re: MASTER: EDID fail
Another Edid failure. This is on a new Dell Vostro 1720 with nVidia 9600M GS video card with 1920x1200 Premium display and a fresh install of Kubuntu 9.04 Jaunty (also applies to Ubuntu). I can only access 1920x1200x24 bit video. Fine for daily use, but no good for gaming when a lower resolution is needed. dccprobe: vbe: VESA 3.0 detected. oem: NVIDIA vendor: NVIDIA Corporation product: G96 Board - vostro21 Chip Rev memory: 14336kb mode: 640x400x256 mode: 640x480x256 mode: 800x600x16 mode: 800x600x256 mode: 1024x768x16 mode: 1024x768x256 mode: 1280x1024x16 mode: 1280x1024x256 mode: 320x200x64k mode: 320x200x16m mode: 640x480x64k mode: 640x480x16m mode: 800x600x64k mode: 800x600x16m mode: 1024x768x64k mode: 1024x768x16m mode: 1280x1024x64k mode: 1280x1024x16m edid: edidfail xrandr: Screen 0: minimum 1920 x 1200, current 1920 x 1200, maximum 1920 x 1200 default connected 1920x1200+0+0 0mm x 0mm 1920x1200 50.0* xresprobe nvidia: id: res: freq: disptype: lcd/lvds xorg.conf: # xorg.conf (X.Org X Window System server configuration file) # # This file was generated by dexconf, the Debian X Configuration tool, using # values from the debconf database. # # Edit this file with caution, and see the xorg.conf manual page. # (Type man xorg.conf at the shell prompt.) # # This file is automatically updated on xserver-xorg package upgrades *only* # if it has not been modified since the last upgrade of the xserver-xorg # package. # # Note that some configuration settings that could be done previously # in this file, now are automatically configured by the server and settings # here are ignored. # # If you have edited this file but would like it to be automatically updated # again, run the following command: # sudo dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg Section Monitor Identifier Configured Monitor EndSection Section Screen Identifier Default Screen Monitor Configured Monitor Device Configured Video Device DefaultDepth24 EndSection Section Module Loadglx EndSection Section Device Identifier Configured Video Device Driver nvidia Option NoLogoTrue EndSection ** Attachment added: edid data http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28861222/edid.bin -- MASTER: EDID fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194760 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 194760] Re: MASTER: EDID fail
Sorry, nearly forgot the log file... ** Attachment added: Xorg.0.log http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28861281/Xorg.0.log -- MASTER: EDID fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/194760 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 334249] Re: Dell Laptop vostro 1310, Internal Keyboard and Touchpad not working anymore on 9.04 jaunty
i8042.reset i8042.nomux is all that I needed. -- Dell Laptop vostro 1310, Internal Keyboard and Touchpad not working anymore on 9.04 jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334249 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 390449] Re: New version (0.5.12~rc1+git20090403-0ubuntu3) breaks wireless (Broadcom wl driver)
Can confirm this. I'm just setting up my new notebook and it took me a good while to narrow this problem to the current hal update packages (I thought it was another problem originally). -- New version (0.5.12~rc1+git20090403-0ubuntu3) breaks wireless (Broadcom wl driver) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/390449 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 334249] Re: Dell Laptop vostro 1310, Internal Keyboard and Touchpad not working anymore on 9.04 jaunty
Yet another confirmation on my three day old Dell Vostro 1720 - no keyboard or mouse on cold boots. I'm using a clean install of Kubuntu 9.04 and Kernel 2.6.28-13-Generic (64-bit). Occurrence for me is 100% on cold boot only, regardless of being on battery power or on AC power. The only work around thats working for me is to load Windoze MEII upon first cold boot. -- Dell Laptop vostro 1310, Internal Keyboard and Touchpad not working anymore on 9.04 jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334249 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209520] Re: SMB error: Unable to mount location when server configured with security=share
I won't be able to try untill this weekend. I'll swap my 250G HD in my laptop over to teh original 120g one and give it a shot and let you know. -- SMB error: Unable to mount location when server configured with security=share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209520 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 209520] Re: SMB error: Unable to mount location when server configured with security=share
Yes, it most certainly does effect Debian as well. My desktop has this problem (Ubuntu Intrepid) and I cannot connect to my D-Link DNS-323 NAS unless I mount it manually from the command prompt. I did try all of the suggestions here. I can see the server, I can see the share, I get prompted for log in info, and then I see empty folder with the message about not being able to display contents of the share. My Laptop, running Debian Etch worked fine until I did some apt-pinning to pull newer stuff in from Lenny Sid. I ended up needing to pull Gnome in from Lenny. And now I'm having the same results - cant access the smb share unless mounted via command prompt. For now, I'm watching and trying new things as they come up - until it's fixed I'm just using the ftp service on the DNS-323 (slightly inconvenient, but it works) -- SMB error: Unable to mount location when server configured with security=share https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209520 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 64762] Re: cannot empty virtual imap trash
Sorry about being so slow - I've have a very hectic schedule. I deleted my folders.db file and that fixed the problem. -- cannot empty virtual imap trash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64762 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222174] Re: B43 driver causing numerous APIC errors
I'm not runing Kubuntu on my Acer Aspire 5002WLMi anymore - I'm running Debian AMD64 Etch/Lenny/Sid (Etch with serveral things ported from testing unstable). At anyrate, try compiling a Kernel from kernel.org - all my wireless problems completly disappeared when I started running the Kernel 2.6.28.x series kernels from there (I only see an occasional APIC error - out side that, I'm now getting solid very reliable connections with b43). And these APIC errors are not with Acer coputers, I've seen many system logs from serveral brand of laptops (HP's, Compaq's) that use broadcrum based wireless adapters. Most people ignore them, and everyone has told me to not worry about them because it's a non issue. Andrew -- B43 driver causing numerous APIC errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 296082] [NEW] Evolution will not empty trash when instructed.
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: evolution I can't delete old emails in waste basket - doesn't matter if I expunge the folder or right click on the trash and hit the empty trash. Nothing happens except the screen refreshes and all the old unwanted email is still present. ProblemType: Bug Architecture: i386 DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.10 ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/evolution NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia Package: evolution 2.24.1-0ubuntu2 ProcEnviron: PATH=/usr/local/sbin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/sbin:/bin:/usr/bin/X11:/usr/games LANG=en_CA.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: evolution Uname: Linux 2.6.27-7-generic i686 ** Affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: apport-bug -- Evolution will not empty trash when instructed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 296082] Re: Evolution will not empty trash when instructed.
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19522028/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: ProcMaps.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19522029/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: ProcStatus.txt http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19522030/ProcStatus.txt -- Evolution will not empty trash when instructed. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 287336] Re: Quickcam video too dark
Same problem being experienced here - the driver loads, but in aMSN Ekiga Softphone I can't make any adjustments to the video leaving a nearly black image. It work's, but it is so dark and with no adjustment control I would exactly call it usable. -- Quickcam video too dark https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/287336 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222174] Re: B43 driver causing numerous APIC errors
Sorry, I'm unable to test the new kernel for this bug - I changed my Laptop over to Debian Etch a few months ago (my other computer is still running Ubuntu). :-( -- B43 driver causing numerous APIC errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222174] Re: B43 driver causing numerous APIC errors
Change that - when the computer goes into sleep mode (when I'm using it on battery - I have all that disabled when runnign on hydro), the wireless won't wake up. I tried having the computer unload B43 and ssb modules before suspending, and then reload them on wake up - and it won't connect to any AP untill I reboot the computer into Windows (it unloads and reloads properly, and I can see various AP's, but if they are encrypted with WEP or WPA it will not communicate at all). So I ended up re-compileing ndiswrapper for Kernel 2.6.24-17 (the packaged one doesn't work properly - it loads but wont talk to any AP) and am now using the current kernel with APIC mode enabled. -- B43 driver causing numerous APIC errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222174] Re: B43 driver causing numerous APIC errors
Sorry for taking so long to write back - I disabled APIC mode using the noapic kernel boot parameter. And have been testing it for a few days to fully confirmed that all the hardware is working properly - a touch slower to boot, and can see a few things that were on separate interrupts are now having to share. No major worries as everything is working as it should be. I'm baffled as to why I can use APIC mode with ndiswrapper and not get a flood of illegal register address messages and the laptop is rock solid stable, but continuously get illegal register messages instability if I don't disable APIC mode while I use the ssb with b43 driver. I wonder if the wireless adapter is doing something abnormal/non-standard... :-( The info I snipped about the Broadcom board: 00:0b.0 Network controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4318 [AirForce One 54g] 802.11g Wireless LAN Controller (rev 02) Subsystem: AMBIT Microsystem Corp. TravelMate 2410 Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 64, IRQ 4 Memory at e200 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=8K] -- B43 driver causing numerous APIC errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222174] Re: B43 driver causing numerous APIC errors
I just checked my old logs, and I don't have 'em. But I can give you two fresh logs in a few minutes - I'll unblock the ssb and b43 drivers while I block ndiswrapper and boot the kernel 2.6.17 that I'm having the problems with, then I'll block them again and unblock ndiswrapper and do another boot of the same kernel for comparison. -- B43 driver causing numerous APIC errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222174] Re: B43 driver causing numerous APIC errors
Log with APIC error's. I think this happens with wireless network activity. ** Attachment added: ssb b43 causing APIC errors http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14413993/dmesg-apicerr.txt -- B43 driver causing numerous APIC errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222174] Re: B43 driver causing numerous APIC errors
Same kernel, ssb b43 blacklisted while ndiswrapper is unblacklisted. ** Attachment added: ndiswrapper - no APIC errors http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14414022/dmesg-noerr.txt -- B43 driver causing numerous APIC errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222174] Re: B43 driver causing numerous APIC errors
Bug also exists in 2.6.24-17 Generic. I also must apologize that I labeled the Kernel version's wrong: 2.6.24-16 Generic is the Kernel I was having problems with originally. The kernel that works fine for me is Gusty's Kernel 2.6.22-14 Generic (my extreme bad) With Kernel 2.6.24-17 2.6.2-16 I can manually remove B43 (modprobe -r b43) to eliminate the APIC error (which stabilizes my system). Both the effected kernels will load ndiswrapper driver, but neither kernel's ndriswrapper will load the windows driver despite the windows device driver showing present when ndiswrapper -l is executed. I also toyed with blacklisting the b43 driver, unloading the ssb driver, and even tried to blacklist the ssb driver - no joy in getting ndiswrapper to take over with the Windows driver. Ndiswrapper works 100% with the Windows Broadcom drivers in the old Gusty 2.6.22-14 Kernel, which is why I've reverted to an older kernel for the time being. -- B43 driver causing numerous APIC errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 222174] [NEW] B43 driver causing numerous APIC errors
Public bug reported: I have an Acer Aspire 5002WLMI and am not able to use the B43 driver in Kernel 2.6.16-24 Generic. When I do, I get tons of APIC error messages in dmesg while the system runs slowly and eventually crashes hard at random. If I use Gusty Kernel 2.6.14-22 Generic with ndiswrapper, I get no APIC error's while system runs fast and stable (can leave it on for days with out crashing). ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Status: New -- B43 driver causing numerous APIC errors https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/222174 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154091] Re: Upgraded to Gusty, but systems want to re-upgrade and can't complete
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 153889 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153889 Okay, the button showed up fine when I want to do the upgrade the first time - but it's still showing up, and that is my problem. I did try hitting it the second time, and eventualy it figured out that it already was upgraded, but the button is still showing up (I'm just ignoreing it for the time being).. I know this is marked as the same as Bug #153889, but I truely do not believe these are the same bugs (although they might be related). Bug 153889 is reported as Although Gutsy is released, Adept does not show the upgrade button. -- Upgraded to Gusty, but systems want to re-upgrade and can't complete https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154091 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 154091] Upgraded to Gusty, but systems want to re-upgrade and can't complete
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager When 7.10 went live, I had my system upgraded right away. 1/2 hour ago (when I first powered up the computer after getting home from work), Aptitude reports there's a distribution upgrade, which fails as system is up to date (as I already did that lat night). ** Affects: update-manager (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Upgraded to Gusty, but systems want to re-upgrade and can't complete https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154091 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105232] Re: Kodak USB connection stalls
I have, it made no difference on any other hardware. I'm presently working away at UDEV HAL to figure out why HAL is not picking up the physical unplugging of my MP3 player (this is why it has been failing to reconnect my MP3 player on subsequent re-connects, HAL think the player was never unplugged - it's a very unusual issue). -- Kodak USB connection stalls https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 51991] Re: Xorg process freezes, uses 100% of CPU. Can be killed by remote terminal.
Same issue here - Acer Aspire 5002WLMi notebook with (really crappy) SiS video adapter. If I let the laptop idle for 30 minutes then Xorg starts eating CPU cycles and maxes out the CPU. If left maxed more then 15 minutes, the only recovery is to kill the X.org process from another terminal (X.org will take down the whole system if I try anything else). This problem did not exist with Drapper or Edgy, and I've been studying this phenomenon since upgrading to Feisty. As long as the computer is in use it fine however (thankfully so). The problem also does not exist on my desktop. I've been through all the system logs (no error messages to trace), so I then disabled all screen savers, and disabled all device drivers I could in xorg.conf - nothing seems to work outside leaving the notebook in a terminal with a sudo'd top so that I can kill xorg. -- Xorg process freezes, uses 100% of CPU. Can be killed by remote terminal. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/51991 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 51991] Re: Xorg process freezes, uses 100% of CPU. Can be killed by remote terminal.
Did some more investigating, it appears that I'm experiencing bug 109507, not this bug - my bad. I unloaded superkaramba and the problem has completely disappeared. -- Xorg process freezes, uses 100% of CPU. Can be killed by remote terminal. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/51991 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 109507] Re: xorg eat 100% of the CPU when I use superkaramba and lock my desktop for a while ([apport] Xorg crashed with signal 5)
Strange, but I can add further verification of this bug... With superkaramba loaded, Xorg would ramp up to 100% usage over 30 minutes when my laptop was left to idle. 15 minutes after it reach top speed it the system would crash if I did anything except kill Xorg. I hadn't experienced this before upgrading to Feisty, and was experiencing it thereafter. I was sure I must have had something mis-configured (I had made a lot of video and screen related changes to play with dual head operation, my HDTV just prior to the upgrade). After endless debugging I gave up trying to solve the issue, and reported it under bug 51991 because it resembled everything I could debug. Even top wasn't showing superkaramba as eating up the CPU cycles, just Xorg. After reading this bug report, I decided to try unloading superkarama, and low and behold, the problem has completely disappeared. Thanks for the reporting, I never would have thought of this - hope this bug can be fixed!! -- xorg eat 100% of the CPU when I use superkaramba and lock my desktop for a while ([apport] Xorg crashed with signal 5) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109507 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105232] Re: Kodak USB connection stalls
Okay, I borrowed a powered hub to see if it's a hardware related issue. I'm now starting to believe this could very well be a hardware bug. I still get very brief stalled messages as before when the transfers of each file I'm copying (moving, deleting, etc) initially occur for each file, however the transfer speeds now match that of when I used to use Windoze. Going to investigate some more, and have yet to try out various MP3 players to see if a powered hub fixes those problems as well. -- Kodak USB connection stalls https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 74036] Re: Oops in scsi_mod and usbstorage
Okay, problem does not exist on my Desktop (Ubuntu Feisty 7.04 instead of Kubuntu). I've been checking, and Hal is not picking up USB device disconnects properly on the Laptop. When I disconnect my Sansa, the Hal Device manager shows it as still being plugged in. -- Oops in scsi_mod and usbstorage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/74036 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105232] Re: Kodak USB connection stalls
No error's reported at all in dmesg - it shows the the device hooking up and disconnecting. I get the STALLED message in the lower left corner of Konquoror, in GPHOTO, and I also get it in dialog boxes of both when attempting to copy files from the camera. -- Kodak USB connection stalls https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 105232] Re: Kodak USB connection stalls
Okay, I've updated and graded over to Kubuntu 7.04 (Feisty), and the transfers are still slow with lots of stall messages. -- Kodak USB connection stalls https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105232 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
