[Bug 339883] Re: the menu text color of openoffice.org applications doesn't change according to the theme settings.
Same problem. Report on it still open here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/anton/+bug/312745 -- the menu text color of openoffice.org applications doesn't change according to the theme settings. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/339883 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 312745] Re: Black openoffice menu in New Wave Theme
Same problem. It's a long standing issue. Another expired report here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/339883 Here says a fix has been released https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/560322 But I just installed Ubuntu 10.04 on a new disk and it's the same old problem for me. -- Black openoffice menu in New Wave Theme https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/312745 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 236770] Re: wine crashed with SIGSEGV in call_initialize_minimal()
I had many problems with segfaults after an upgrade. I have since done a clean install. So, unless anyone else has a problem, this might as well be closed. -- wine crashed with SIGSEGV in call_initialize_minimal() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236770 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 236276] Re: Segfault When Installing ia32-sun-java6-bin
Thanks for the reply, but this might as well be closed. As mentioned, I had many problems after an upgrade, with segfaults all over the place. I decided on a clean install. I won't even bother with Java until there is a release for 64 bit Firefox. Thanks again. -- Segfault When Installing ia32-sun-java6-bin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 238236] Re: gnome-system-log crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()
I can't reproduce it. This was one of many problems I had after taking the Feisty Gutsy Hardy upgrade path. The problems mounted up and defeated me in the end and I decided on a fresh install. So, I guess this one is closed on my part. Thanks anyway. -- gnome-system-log crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238236 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 238236] Re: gnome-system-log crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- gnome-system-log crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_cast() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/238236 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 236770] Re: wine crashed with SIGSEGV in call_initialize_minimal()
** Visibility changed to: Public -- wine crashed with SIGSEGV in call_initialize_minimal() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236770 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191575] Re: wine segfaults on winecfg
Hi, Once I tried that command, I got a blank line, and then of course a 0 after running cat /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr I then ran winecfg. A segfault resulted again. However, an apport report was triggered which may shed some more light on the problem. The new bug report generated by apport is here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wine/+bug/236770 -- wine segfaults on winecfg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 235495] Re: unmounted volumes still show in nautilus tree
In my case, it looks like I was jumping the gun. My apologies. It's still true that my iPod icon does not change when the iPod is unmounted. However, the mounting and unmounting of other devices (camera, USB) is working correctly. So, I'm not really getting what is described here. None of my device occurrences multiply, and my iPod alone just stays the same in the nautilus tree. -- unmounted volumes still show in nautilus tree https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235495 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203825] Re: [hardy] GDM hangs on a black screen upon startup
Also, I'd like to add that I've found I only get this problem after installing fglrx according to these instructions on the Unofficial ATI Linux Driver Wiki: http://wiki.cchtml.com/index.php/Ubu...allation_Guide Following these instructions is the only way I can get a working fglrx driver. However, if I use the regular Ubuntu xorg repositories for fglrx, it doesn't happen. But then I am left with Mesa OpenGL rendering, which doesn't work will for me. -- [hardy] GDM hangs on a black screen upon startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203825 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191575] Re: wine segfaults on winecfg
Hi Daniel, Yes, 0.9.59-0ubuntu5 crashes. I listed the versions earlier that I've tried. I reinstalled 0.9.59-0ubuntu5 and this is when I get when I try to run Notepad, for example: wine[15061]: segfault at 4a6c3f68 rip 4a6c3f68 rsp ffe68dfc error 15 Apport doesn't generate anything automatically, at least not in /var/crash. I ran a command I'd noticed on a website, apport-cli -f -p wine. It generated information and opened up a browser at launchpad, ready for me to submit a new report, but I don't want to do that. I just need the info to put here. So, I'm not sure how to use apport to generate a report I can cut and paste. I should mention that since upgrading to Hardy, I've been getting many segfaults, more than I've even seen in my life! -- wine segfaults on winecfg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191575] Re: wine segfaults on winecfg
Hi Bryan, $ cat /proc/sys/vm/mmap_min_addr 65536 Is that significant? -- wine segfaults on winecfg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 182345] Re: nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_remove_dir()
It just happened to me today after a reboot. Hardy 8.04 Nautilus 1:2.22.2-0ubuntu6 Linux 2.6.24-17-generic x86_64 -- nautilus crashed with SIGSEGV in gconf_client_remove_dir() https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/182345 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 235495] Re: unmounted volumes still show in nautilus tree
I am having the same problem with the unmount status not being reflected in Nautilus. However, it may not be exactly the same as the one reported. After an upgrade to Hardy, when I unmount my iPod, for example, its icon remains exactly the same. A right click will show the option to mount it. But a click of the left mouse button on the icon will automatically mount the iPod, although it will not give any indication that it has, which I cannot see as a feature. Also, unlike Rolf's report, if I open a new nautilus window with Ctrl+n, it will STILL show the already unmounted device. -- unmounted volumes still show in nautilus tree https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235495 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 236276] [NEW] Segfault When Installing ia32-sun-java6-bin
Public bug reported: I am running Ubuntu 8.04 64 bit. Because java does not work with Firefox 3 64 bit, I decided on installing the 32 bit version of Firefox, so I could have java and flash. However, when installing ia32-sun-java6-bin, a segfault results. ia32-sun-java6-bin: Installed: 6-06-0ubuntu1 Candidate: 6-06-0ubuntu1 Version table: *** 6-06-0ubuntu1 0 500 http://archive.ubuntu.com hardy/multiverse Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status This is the output from the terminal: The following NEW packages will be installed: ia32-sun-java6-bin 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded. Need to get 0B/27.3MB of archives. After this operation, 81.9MB of additional disk space will be used. Preconfiguring packages ... Selecting previously deselected package ia32-sun-java6-bin. (Reading database ... 199100 files and directories currently installed.) Unpacking ia32-sun-java6-bin (from .../ia32-sun-java6-bin_6-06-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb) ... sun-dlj-v1-1 license has already been accepted Setting up ia32-sun-java6-bin (6-06-0ubuntu1) ... /var/lib/dpkg/info/ia32-sun-java6-bin.postinst: line 88: 14764 Segmentation fault $basedir/bin/java -client -Xshare:dump $xmarg /dev/null dpkg: error processing ia32-sun-java6-bin (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 139 Errors were encountered while processing: ia32-sun-java6-bin E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) This is the output from syslog: May 31 20:37:49 server1 kernel: [35823.603506] java[16479]: segfault at c rip 4a6dcf39 rsp ffb4c300 error 4 Please note that I have been getting a series of segfaults (wine, swiftweasal, skype, npviewer, nautilus,gtk-gnash) since upgrading to Hardy from Feisty. ** Affects: sun-java6 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Segfault When Installing ia32-sun-java6-bin https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/236276 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 235946] Re: No Appropriate Viewer Error in Hardy 64
** Description changed: Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper I had flash working in Feisty. But after upgrading to Hardy, I cannot install it because of this: - Flash Plugin installed. - nspluginwrapper: no appropriate viewer found for /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so - dpkg: error processing flashplugin-nonfree (--configure): - subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 - Errors were encountered while processing: - flashplugin-nonfree - E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) + Flash Plugin installed. + nspluginwrapper: no appropriate viewer found for /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so + dpkg: error processing flashplugin-nonfree (--configure): + subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 + Errors were encountered while processing: + flashplugin-nonfree + E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I have tried downgrading to ia32-libs 2.1 to no affect. I have tried the last deb of nspluginwrapper (0.9.91.6_amd64) to no affect. Please note that I copied /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so to /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins/libflashplayer.so - Then I ran this: - sudo nspluginwrapper -i /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins/libflashplayer.so + Then I ran this: + + sudo nspluginwrapper -i /usr/lib/firefox- + addons/plugins/libflashplayer.so But I got the same error: - nspluginwrapper: no appropriate viewer found for /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins/libflashplayer.so + + nspluginwrapper: no appropriate viewer found for /usr/lib/firefox- + addons/plugins/libflashplayer.so I hadn't ever seen this error until I upgraded to Hardy. Now that I look around, it seems that people were getting it in Gutsy, so it's nothing new. And yet it's still around and it's turned up in Hardy. + + UPDATE: + OK, I just noticed that I'm getting these kinds of errors every time I try to install or run nspluginwrapper: + + npviewer.bin[14073]: segfault at 0 rip 0 rsp ffcb6ae0 error 14 -- No Appropriate Viewer Error in Hardy 64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235946 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203825] Re: [hardy] GDM hangs on a black screen upon startup
Sorry, can't see where to edit previous comments. So, the second Gtk-WARNING: cannot open display: :0 shown above should be gdm[9989] not gdm[9987] -- [hardy] GDM hangs on a black screen upon startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203825 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 203825] Re: [hardy] GDM hangs on a black screen upon startup
I am having the same problem. But first I get the notorious xsessions login error message. That goes away after a few seconds, then I get the black screen with the x cursor. The following seems to occur around the time it happens: May 30 21:23:14 server1 gdm[9367]: Gtk-WARNING: Ignoring the separator setting ... [some time out messages regarding nfs mounts] . . . -- could this be why? Then I think this happens when I hit Ctrl + Alt + Backspace: May 30 21:25:39 server1 gdm[6456]: WARNING: failsafe dialog failed (inhibitions: 0 0) May 30 21:25:39 server1 kernel: [ 264.543047] [fglrx] interrupt source 1000 successfully disabled! . . . [some other fglrx lines] . . . May 30 21:25:39 server1 gdm[9987]: Gtk-WARNING: cannot open display: :0 May 30 21:25:40 server1 gdm[6456]: WARNING: failsafe dialog failed (inhibitions: 0 1) May 30 21:25:39 server1 gdm[9987]: Gtk-WARNING: cannot open display: :0 May 30 21:25:40 server1 gdm[6456]: WARNING: failsafe dialog failed (inhibitions: 1 1) May 30 21:25:40 server1 gdm[6459]: WARNING: gdm_slave_xioerror_handler: Fatal X error - Restarting :0 May 30 21:25:42 server1 kernel: [ 266.860543] firegl1.isse.53[10023]: segfault at c rip 4a6dcf39 rsp ff865580 error 4 May 30 21:25:42 server1 kernel: [ 266.861507] firegl1.isse.53[10024]: segfault at c rip 4a6dcf39 rsp ffce7a00 error 4 I do Ctrl + Alt + Backspace to get back to the login. When I login in again, everything is fine. -- [hardy] GDM hangs on a black screen upon startup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/203825 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191575] Re: wine segfaults on winecfg
I'd like to confirm that this problem still exist with the new release of wine, version 1.0~rc3~winehq0~ubuntu~8.04-1 wine[31665]: segfault at 4a6c3f68 rip 4a6c3f68 rsp ff7fd80c error 15 -- wine segfaults on winecfg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 191575] Re: wine segfaults on winecfg
I've had not joy with any version of wine since upgrading to Hardy. I've tried 0.9.55, 0.9.56, 0.9.59, 0.9.61, and the latest wine update, 1.0-rc2, like all the others, gives me this: wine[10346]: segfault at 4a6c3f68 rip 4a6c3f68 rsp ffd40ccc error 15 -- wine segfaults on winecfg https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191575 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 235755] [NEW] Folder Window Backgrounds Messed Up
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 228534 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/228534 Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nautilus Since upgrading to Hardy 64bit (from Feisty), I cannot get consistent background patterns in any windows. Instead I get random and very ugly background patterns that make folder names illegible. I have to add another background to read them or view everything as a list. The patterns are usually not even close to the pattern I'd previous chosen as a default. The patterns vary. However, one that does seem to recur has a black background with small vertical lines across the window. These small lines are alternatively red and aqua colored. If I open another window that has everything listed and select View as Icons, it might be a completely different pattern, but invariably a complete mess. But if I go from window to window, when each is in icon view, the patterns will be the same. At the moment, I have to view everything as a list. ** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Description changed: Binary package hint: nautilus Since upgrading to Hardy, I cannot get consistent background patterns in any windows. Instead I get random and very ugly background patterns that make folder names illegible. I have to add another background to read them or view everything as a list. The patterns are usually not even close to the pattern I'd previous - chosen as a default. The patterns vary, however, one that does seem to + chosen as a default. The patterns vary. However, one that does seem to recur has a black background with small vertical lines across the window. These small lines are alternatively red and aqua colored. - If I open another window and select View as Icons it might be a - completely different pattern, but invariably a complete mess. + If I open another window that has everything listed and select View as + Icons, it might be a completely different pattern, but invariably a + complete mess. But if I go from window to window, when each is in icon + view, the patterns will be the same. - At the moment, I have to view everything as a list + At the moment, I have to view everything as a list. ** Description changed: Binary package hint: nautilus - Since upgrading to Hardy, I cannot get consistent background patterns in - any windows. Instead I get random and very ugly background patterns that - make folder names illegible. I have to add another background to read - them or view everything as a list. + Since upgrading to Hardy 64bit (from Feisty), I cannot get consistent + background patterns in any windows. Instead I get random and very ugly + background patterns that make folder names illegible. I have to add + another background to read them or view everything as a list. The patterns are usually not even close to the pattern I'd previous chosen as a default. The patterns vary. However, one that does seem to recur has a black background with small vertical lines across the window. These small lines are alternatively red and aqua colored. If I open another window that has everything listed and select View as Icons, it might be a completely different pattern, but invariably a complete mess. But if I go from window to window, when each is in icon view, the patterns will be the same. At the moment, I have to view everything as a list. -- Folder Window Backgrounds Messed Up https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235755 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 180854] Re: Cannot install flash in Ubuntu Hardy 64 bit
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 180478 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180478 I also tried the roll back to ia32-libs 2.1, however, I still get the same problem others are encountering. Flash Plugin installed. nspluginwrapper: no appropriate viewer found for /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so dpkg: error processing flashplugin-nonfree (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: flashplugin-nonfree E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) The only things that works for me is gnash. -- Cannot install flash in Ubuntu Hardy 64 bit https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/180854 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 235946] [NEW] No Appropriate Viewer Error in Hardy 64
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: nspluginwrapper I had flash working in Feisty. But after upgrading to Hardy, I cannot install it because of this: Flash Plugin installed. nspluginwrapper: no appropriate viewer found for /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so dpkg: error processing flashplugin-nonfree (--configure): subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 Errors were encountered while processing: flashplugin-nonfree E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1) I have tried downgrading to ia32-libs 2.1 to no affect. I have tried the last deb of nspluginwrapper (0.9.91.6_amd64) to no affect. Please note that I copied /usr/lib/flashplugin-nonfree/libflashplayer.so to /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins/libflashplayer.so Then I ran this: sudo nspluginwrapper -i /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins/libflashplayer.so But I got the same error: nspluginwrapper: no appropriate viewer found for /usr/lib/firefox-addons/plugins/libflashplayer.so I hadn't ever seen this error until I upgraded to Hardy. Now that I look around, it seems that people were getting it in Gutsy, so it's nothing new. And yet it's still around and it's turned up in Hardy. ** Affects: nspluginwrapper (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- No Appropriate Viewer Error in Hardy 64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235946 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
