[Bug 2059160] Re: proposed-migration for ycmd 0+20231230+git9e43034+ds-2build2
** Changed in: ycmd (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Vladimir Petko (vpa1977) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059160 Title: proposed-migration for ycmd 0+20231230+git9e43034+ds-2build2 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ycmd/+bug/2059160/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059361] Re: proposed-migration plplot 5.15.0+dfsg2-9
** Changed in: plplot (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059361 Title: proposed-migration plplot 5.15.0+dfsg2-9 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plplot/+bug/2059361/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059361] Re: proposed-migration plplot 5.15.0+dfsg2-9
** Changed in: plplot (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Vladimir Petko (vpa1977) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059361 Title: proposed-migration plplot 5.15.0+dfsg2-9 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plplot/+bug/2059361/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065085] Re: Please merge libnss-ldap 265-6 into Oracular
** Summary changed: - Please merge 265-6 into Oracular + Please merge libnss-ldap 265-6 into Oracular -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065085 Title: Please merge libnss-ldap 265-6 into Oracular To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnss-ldap/+bug/2065085/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2047933] Re: Fix for CVE-2023-46589 in Jammy's tomcat9
** Tags added: fr-7666 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047933 Title: Fix for CVE-2023-46589 in Jammy's tomcat9 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomcat9/+bug/2047933/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065169] Re: autopkgtest failures with 7.3.1+1+ds1-1
** Tags added: fr-7665 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065169 Title: autopkgtest failures with 7.3.1+1+ds1-1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jtreg7/+bug/2065169/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064986] Re: please merge gnome-system-tools 3.0.0-10 from debian unstable
piuparts (install/upgrade/purge) pass ** Attachment added: "piutest-gnome-system-tools.log.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/2064986/+attachment/5776155/+files/piutest-gnome-system-tools.log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064986 Title: please merge gnome-system-tools 3.0.0-10 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/2064986/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064898] Re: please merge procyon 0.6.0-2 from debian unstable
piuparts test (install/upgrade/purge) (pass) ** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~vpa1977/ubuntu/+source/procyon/+git/procyon/+merge/465740 ** Attachment added: "piutest-procyon.log.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procyon/+bug/2064898/+attachment/5776148/+files/piutest-procyon.log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064898 Title: please merge procyon 0.6.0-2 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procyon/+bug/2064898/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064895] Re: please merge munin 2.0.75-2 from debian unstable
piuparts test (install/upgrade/purge) ** Attachment added: "piutest-munin.log.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/munin/+bug/2064895/+attachment/5776122/+files/piutest-munin.log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064895 Title: please merge munin 2.0.75-2 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/munin/+bug/2064895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064895] Re: please merge munin 2.0.75-2 from debian unstable
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~vpa1977/ubuntu/+source/munin/+git/munin/+merge/465735 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064895 Title: please merge munin 2.0.75-2 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/munin/+bug/2064895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065105] Re: please merge tcpxtract 1.0.1-18 from debian unstable
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~vpa1977/ubuntu/+source/tcpxtract/+git/tcpxtract/+merge/465734 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065105 Title: please merge tcpxtract 1.0.1-18 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tcpxtract/+bug/2065105/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2065105] [NEW] please merge tcpxtract 1.0.1-18 from debian unstable
Public bug reported: tracking bug ** Affects: tcpxtract (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2065105 Title: please merge tcpxtract 1.0.1-18 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tcpxtract/+bug/2065105/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064986] Re: please merge gnome-system-tools 3.0.0-10 from debian unstable
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~vpa1977/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+git/gnome-system-tools/+merge/465627 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064986 Title: please merge gnome-system-tools 3.0.0-10 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/2064986/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064998] Re: please sync spotlighter 0.3-1.2 from debian unstable
This bug was fixed in the package spotlighter - 0.3-1.2 --- spotlighter (0.3-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload. * Add patch to add callback declaration to resolve -Werror=implicit-function-declaration. (Closes: #1066355) Thanks to Vladimir Petko for the patch! -- Andreas Rönnquist Wed, 24 Apr 2024 12:47:30 +0200 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064998 Title: please sync spotlighter 0.3-1.2 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spotlighter/+bug/2064998/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064998] [NEW] please sync spotlighter 0.3-1.2 from debian unstable
Public bug reported: Ubuntu introduced following delta: spotlighter (0.3-1.1ubuntu1) noble; urgency=medium * d/p/2_ftbfs_implicit_declaration.patch: declare callback to resolve -Werror=implicit-function-declaration ftbfs (LP: #2061331). Debian has integrated those changes in spotlighter (0.3-1.2) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload. * Add patch to add callback declaration to resolve -Werror=implicit-function-declaration. (Closes: #1066355) Thanks to Vladimir Petko for the patch! No other changes remain. PPA build[1] [1] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/plusone/+sourcepub/16121987/+listing- archive-extra ** Affects: spotlighter (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: Fix Released ** Changed in: spotlighter (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: spotlighter (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064998 Title: please sync spotlighter 0.3-1.2 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spotlighter/+bug/2064998/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064997] Re: please libnb-platform18-java 12.1-3 from debian unstable
This bug was fixed in the package libnb-platform18-java - 12.1-3 --- libnb-platform18-java (12.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload * d/p/allow-security-manager.patch: cherry-pick upstream patch to allow setting Java Security Manager (Closes: #1069015). -- Vladimir Petko Mon, 15 Apr 2024 17:24:38 +1200 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064997 Title: please libnb-platform18-java 12.1-3 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnb-platform18-java/+bug/2064997/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064997] [NEW] please libnb-platform18-java 12.1-3 from debian unstable
Public bug reported: Ubuntu introduced following delta: libnb-platform18-java (12.1-2ubuntu1) noble; urgency=medium * d/p/allow-security-manager.patch: cherry-pick upstream patch to allow setting Java Security Manager (LP: #2061363). This change was integrated in Debian: libnb-platform18-java (12.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload * d/p/allow-security-manager.patch: cherry-pick upstream patch to allow setting Java Security Manager (Closes: #1069015). No other Ubuntu changes remain. PPA build[1] [1] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/plusone/+sourcepub/16121986/+listing- archive-extra ** Affects: libnb-platform18-java (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Released ** Changed in: libnb-platform18-java (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064997 Title: please libnb-platform18-java 12.1-3 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnb-platform18-java/+bug/2064997/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064995] Re: please sync sniffit 0.6-1 from debian unstable
This bug was fixed in the package sniffit - 0.6-1 --- sniffit (0.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version 0.6. (Closes: #1066536) * debian/control: - Bumped Standards-Version to 4.6.2. - Changed from libncurses5-dev to libncurses-dev. * debian/copyright: updated packaging copyright years. -- Joao Eriberto Mota Filho Tue, 23 Apr 2024 22:11:43 -0300 ** Changed in: sniffit (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064995 Title: please sync sniffit 0.6-1 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sniffit/+bug/2064995/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064995] [NEW] please sync sniffit 0.6-1 from debian unstable
Public bug reported: Ubuntu introduced the following delta from sniffit 06: sniffit (0.5-3ubuntu1) noble; urgency=medium * d/p/implicit-declaration.patch: cherry-pick upstream patch to resolve -Werror=implicit-function-declaration (LP: #2061033). Debian performed new upstream release: sniffit (0.6-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream version 0.6. (Closes: #1066536) * debian/control: - Bumped Standards-Version to 4.6.2. - Changed from libncurses5-dev to libncurses-dev. * debian/copyright: updated packaging copyright years. and the patch is no longer needed. PPA build[1] [1] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/plusone/+sourcepub/16124398/+listing-archive-extra ** Affects: sniffit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064995 Title: please sync sniffit 0.6-1 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sniffit/+bug/2064995/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064993] [NEW] please sync android-platform-tools-apksig 31.0.2-2 from debian unstable
Public bug reported: Ubuntu introduced following delta: android-platform-tools-apksig (31.0.2-1ubuntu1) noble; urgency=medium * d/p/update-failure-reason: update test assertion due to java.security implementation changes (LP: #2056087). It was integrated in Debian: android-platform-tools-apksig (31.0.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium [ Vladimir Petko ] * d/p/update-failure-reason: update test assertion due to java.security implementation changes (Closes: #1064676). No more Ubuntu delta remains. PPA build[1] [1] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/plusone/+sourcepub/16121984/+listing- archive-extra ** Affects: android-platform-tools-apksig (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Released ** Changed in: android-platform-tools-apksig (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064993 Title: please sync android-platform-tools-apksig 31.0.2-2 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/android-platform-tools-apksig/+bug/2064993/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064993] Re: please sync android-platform-tools-apksig 31.0.2-2 from debian unstable
This bug was fixed in the package android-platform-tools-apksig - 31.0.2-2 --- android-platform-tools-apksig (31.0.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium [ Vladimir Petko ] * d/p/update-failure-reason: update test assertion due to java.security implementation changes (Closes: #1064676). [ Debian Janitor ] * Remove constraints unnecessary since buster (oldstable) -- Hans-Christoph Steiner Sun, 21 Apr 2024 21:37:47 +0200 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064993 Title: please sync android-platform-tools-apksig 31.0.2-2 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/android-platform-tools-apksig/+bug/2064993/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064991] [NEW] please sync ncrack 0.7+debian-6 from debian unstable
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu introduced following delta:
ncrack (0.7+debian-5ubuntu1) noble; urgency=medium
* debian/patches/implicit-declaration-in-configure.patch: add missing
headers to workaround -Werror=implicit-function-declaration (Closes:
#1065799, LP: #2060908).
It was integrated in Debian:
ncrack (0.7+debian-6) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Vladimir Petko ]
* d/p/{implicit-declaration-in-configure.patch, implicit-declaration-
xmalloc.patch}: add missing headers and defines to resolve -
Werror=implicit-function-declaration build failures (Closes:
#1065799).
No more Ubuntu delta remains.
PPA build[1]
[1]
https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/plusone/+sourcepub/16121983/+listing-
archive-extra
** Affects: ncrack (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist
Status: Fix Released
** Changed in: ncrack (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Wishlist
** Changed in: ncrack (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064991
Title:
please sync ncrack 0.7+debian-6 from debian unstable
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ncrack/+bug/2064991/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064991] Re: please sync ncrack 0.7+debian-6 from debian unstable
This bug was fixed in the package ncrack - 0.7+debian-6
---
ncrack (0.7+debian-6) unstable; urgency=medium
[ Vladimir Petko ]
* d/p/{implicit-declaration-in-configure.patch, implicit-declaration-
xmalloc.patch}: add missing headers and defines to resolve -
Werror=implicit-function-declaration build failures (Closes:
#1065799).
-- Arnaud Rebillout Mon, 22 Apr 2024 08:59:25 +0700
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064991
Title:
please sync ncrack 0.7+debian-6 from debian unstable
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ncrack/+bug/2064991/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064989] Re: please sync libmatthew-java 0.8.1-3 from debian unstable
This bug was fixed in the package libmatthew-java - 0.8.1-3 --- libmatthew-java (0.8.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium [ Vladimir Petko ] * debian/rules: use java_compat_level variable provided by java-common to adjust --release level to the minimum required by the default Java (Closes: #1052581). (Closes: #1069496) [ Thorsten Alteholz ] * debian/control: bump standard to 4.7.0 (no changes) -- Thorsten Alteholz Sun, 21 Apr 2024 12:42:46 +0200 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064989 Title: please sync libmatthew-java 0.8.1-3 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmatthew-java/+bug/2064989/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064989] [NEW] please sync libmatthew-java 0.8.1-3 from debian unstable
Public bug reported: Ubuntu delta was introduced in libmatthew-java (0.8.1-2ubuntu1) noble; urgency=medium * d/rules: use java_compat_level variable provided by java-common to adjust --release level to the minimum required by the default Java (LP: #1049791, LP: #2052572). The changes were integrated in Debian: libmatthew-java (0.8.1-3) unstable; urgency=medium * debian/rules: use java_compat_level variable provided by java-common to adjust --release level to the minimum required by the default Java (Closes: #1052581). (Closes: #1069496) No Ubuntu-specific delta remains. PPA build[1] [1] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/plusone/+sourcepub/16121982/+listing- archive-extra ** Affects: libmatthew-java (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: Fix Released ** Changed in: libmatthew-java (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: libmatthew-java (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064989 Title: please sync libmatthew-java 0.8.1-3 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmatthew-java/+bug/2064989/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064988] [NEW] please sync iraf-fitsutil 2018.07.06-8 from debian unstable
Public bug reported: Ubuntu delta was introduced in 2018.07.06-7ubuntu1 * d/p/use-time-t.patch: use time_t instead of long for timestamps (LP: #2058985) Ubuntu delta was integrated in 2018.07.06-8: * Use time_t instead of long to represent timestamps. (Closes: #1068791) No other ubuntu-specific changes remain. PPA build[1] [1] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/plusone/+sourcepub/16121981/+listing- archive-extra ** Affects: iraf-fitsutil (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Fix Released ** Changed in: iraf-fitsutil (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064988 Title: please sync iraf-fitsutil 2018.07.06-8 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iraf-fitsutil/+bug/2064988/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064988] Re: please sync iraf-fitsutil 2018.07.06-8 from debian unstable
This bug was fixed in the package iraf-fitsutil - 2018.07.06-8 --- iraf-fitsutil (2018.07.06-8) unstable; urgency=medium * Use time_t instead of long to represent timestamps. (Closes: #1068791) -- Ole Streicher Thu, 11 Apr 2024 16:21:05 +0200 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064988 Title: please sync iraf-fitsutil 2018.07.06-8 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iraf-fitsutil/+bug/2064988/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064986] [NEW] please merge gnome-system-tools 3.0.0-10 from debian unstable
Public bug reported: tracking bug ** Affects: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: New ** Changed in: gnome-system-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Summary changed: - please sync gnome-system-tools 3.0.0-10 from debian unstable + please merge gnome-system-tools 3.0.0-10 from debian unstable ** Description changed: - Ubuntu delta in 3.0.0-9.1ubuntu4 - * d/p/implicit_declaration.patch: add missing declarations to resolve - ftbfs (LP: #2060165). - - Was integrated in gnome-system-tools 3.0.0-10 - * Add implicit_declaration.patch (Closes: #1066239). - - No delta remains. - - PPA build[1] - - - [1] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/plusone/+sourcepub/16121980/+listing-archive-extra + tracking bug -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064986 Title: please merge gnome-system-tools 3.0.0-10 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-system-tools/+bug/2064986/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064981] Re: please sync plantuml 1:1.2020.2+ds-5 from debian unstable
This bug was fixed in the package plantuml - 1:1.2020.2+ds-5 --- plantuml (1:1.2020.2+ds-5) unstable; urgency=medium * Add missing libfontconfig1 dependency (Closes: #1068999) * Sort plantuml dependencies, move font stuff to the end. -- Andrej Shadura Tue, 23 Apr 2024 10:34:03 +0200 plantuml (1:1.2020.2+ds-4) unstable; urgency=medium * Explicitly depend on fontmanager dependencies as headless JRE no longer does (Closes: #1068437, #1067333). -- Andrej Shadura Fri, 05 Apr 2024 10:40:17 +0200 ** Changed in: plantuml (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064981 Title: please sync plantuml 1:1.2020.2+ds-5 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plantuml/+bug/2064981/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064981] Re: please sync plantuml 1:1.2020.2+ds-5 from debian unstable
** Description changed: plantuml 1:1.2020.2+ds-5 resolves fontconfig issue[1] and can be synced. plantuml Ubuntu delta changed dependency to -jre where Debian kept dependency on jre-headless and added additional dependencies directly to the package. PPA build[2] + Smoke test - generate a diagram from + --- + @startuml + class Foo + @enduml + --- + passes. + [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068999 [2] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/plusone/+sourcepub/16121969/+listing-archive-extra ** Changed in: plantuml (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064981 Title: please sync plantuml 1:1.2020.2+ds-5 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plantuml/+bug/2064981/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064981] [NEW] please sync plantuml 1:1.2020.2+ds-5 from debian unstable
Public bug reported: plantuml 1:1.2020.2+ds-5 resolves fontconfig issue[1] and can be synced. plantuml Ubuntu delta changed dependency to -jre where Debian kept dependency on jre-headless and added additional dependencies directly to the package. PPA build[2] Smoke test - generate a diagram from --- @startuml class Foo @enduml --- passes. [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068999 [2] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/plusone/+sourcepub/16121969/+listing-archive-extra ** Affects: plantuml (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Status: New ** Description changed: plantuml 1:1.2020.2+ds-5 resolves fontconfig issue[1] and can be synced. plantuml Ubuntu delta changed dependency to -jre where Debian kept dependency on jre-headless and added additional dependencies directly to the package. - + PPA build[2] [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068999 + [2] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/plusone/+sourcepub/16121969/+listing-archive-extra -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064981 Title: please sync plantuml 1:1.2020.2+ds-5 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plantuml/+bug/2064981/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064950] Re: Sync xbill 2.1-10 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
This bug was fixed in the package xbill - 2.1-10 --- xbill (2.1-10) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload. [ Reiner Herrmann ] * Fix FTBFS because of implicit declaration. (Closes: #1066574) * Update watch file to version 4. * Bump Standards-Version to 4.7.0. * Bump debhelper compat level to 13. -- Boyuan Yang Sat, 20 Apr 2024 10:05:44 -0400 ** Changed in: xbill (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064950 Title: Sync xbill 2.1-10 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xbill/+bug/2064950/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064949] Re: Sync pike8.0 8.0.1738-1.4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
This bug was fixed in the package pike8.0 - 8.0.1738-1.4 --- pike8.0 (8.0.1738-1.4) unstable; urgency=medium * Non-maintainer upload. * d/copyright: Replace MPL text with link to common-licenses. * Fix implicit declarations (Closes: #1066378). * Add note on dropped PCRE module. -- Bastian Germann Sat, 20 Apr 2024 08:24:08 + ** Changed in: pike8.0 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064949 Title: Sync pike8.0 8.0.1738-1.4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pike8.0/+bug/2064949/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064947] Re: Sync ruby-fusefs 0.7.0-6 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
This bug was fixed in the package ruby-fusefs - 0.7.0-6
---
ruby-fusefs (0.7.0-6) unstable; urgency=medium
* Add patch to add missing includes. Thanks Zixing Liu (Closes: #1067066)
* Move debian/watch to gemwatch.debian.net
* Remove X?-Ruby-Versions fields from d/control
* update years in d/copyright
* Set Rules-Requires-Root to no
* Use ${ruby:Depends}, drop explicit dependency on ruby interpreter
* Bump Standards-Version to 4.7.0 (no changes needed)
-- Cédric Boutillier Sat, 13 Apr 2024 23:27:54
+0200
** Changed in: ruby-fusefs (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064947
Title:
Sync ruby-fusefs 0.7.0-6 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-fusefs/+bug/2064947/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064898] Re: please merge procyon 0.6.0-2 from debian unstable
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~vpa1977/ubuntu/+source/procyon/+git/procyon/+merge/465559 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064898 Title: please merge procyon 0.6.0-2 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procyon/+bug/2064898/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064898] [NEW] please merge procyon 0.6.0-2 from debian unstable
Public bug reported: tracking bug ** Affects: procyon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064898 Title: please merge procyon 0.6.0-2 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procyon/+bug/2064898/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064895] Re: please merge munin 2.0.75-2 from debian unstable
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~vpa1977/ubuntu/+source/munin/+git/munin/+merge/465558 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064895 Title: please merge munin 2.0.75-2 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/munin/+bug/2064895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064895] [NEW] please merge munin 2.0.75-2 from debian unstable
Public bug reported: tracking bug ** Affects: munin (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064895 Title: please merge munin 2.0.75-2 from debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/munin/+bug/2064895/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063834] Re: openjdk-8-jre:i386 openjdk-8-jre-headless:i386 missing for noble
Would it be ok to update the bug like this: - openjdk-8:i386 is required for our users to run existing proprietary i386 applications that link against openjdk. i386 openjdk is not readily available, e.g. Temurin[1] stopped those builds. Continuing to provide openjdk-8:i386 in noble will allow our users to migrate to the latest LTS. [1] https://adoptium.net/en-GB/temurin/releases/?version=8=linux=x86=jdk -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063834 Title: openjdk-8-jre:i386 openjdk-8-jre-headless:i386 missing for noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-8/+bug/2063834/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063834] Re: openjdk-8-jre:i386 openjdk-8-jre-headless:i386 missing for noble
I apologise for this situation. I wonder if i386 is used due to the hardware or other constraints that make switching to amd64 impossible? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063834 Title: openjdk-8-jre:i386 openjdk-8-jre-headless:i386 missing for noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-8/+bug/2063834/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2064087] Re: i386 openjdk-8 architecture disappeared from Noble repository
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2063834 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063834 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2063834 openjdk-8-jre:i386 openjdk-8-jre-headless:i386 missing for noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064087 Title: i386 openjdk-8 architecture disappeared from Noble repository To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-8/+bug/2064087/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063834] Re: openjdk-8-jre:i386 openjdk-8-jre-headless:i386 missing for noble
Indeed ... I think the decision was made by archive admins to remove it because there was no use case that I could argue for to keep i386 openjdk-8. I wonder if we can provide a convincing enough reason to reinstate the package in noble? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063834 Title: openjdk-8-jre:i386 openjdk-8-jre-headless:i386 missing for noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-8/+bug/2063834/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059163] Re: ca-certificates-java fails can-configure-cross-compilation
Intermittent issue during time_t transition. It is no longer reproducible . autopkgtest [14:15:23]: summary can-convert-keystore PASS can-install-jre PASS can-install-multiple-jdks PASS can-install-libreoffice PASS can-configure-cross-compilation PASS ** Changed in: ca-certificates-java (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: openjdk-21 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059163 Title: ca-certificates-java fails can-configure-cross-compilation To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ca-certificates-java/+bug/2059163/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058966] Re: proposed-migration for collectd 5.12.0-17.1build1
Fixed in 21.0.3+9-1[1] [1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-21/21.0.3+9-1 ** Changed in: openjdk-21 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058966 Title: proposed-migration for collectd 5.12.0-17.1build1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/collectd/+bug/2058966/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2054943] Re: jruby: mri-extra - flaky TestOpen3 pipe tests
openjdk-21 has fixed pipe issue in 21.0.3~7ea-1. https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-21/21.0.3~7ea-1 ** Changed in: java-common (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: openjdk-21 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054943 Title: jruby: mri-extra - flaky TestOpen3 pipe tests To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/java-common/+bug/2054943/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061027] Re: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
Fixed in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tcpxtract/+bug/2063015
This bug was fixed in the package tcpxtract - 1.0.1-17ubuntu3
---
tcpxtract (1.0.1-17ubuntu3) noble; urgency=medium
* Update configuration parser to resolve autopkgtest crash (LP: #2063015):
- d/p/90_terminate_lexem.patch: enable verbose parser errors,
terminate comment line lexem, match '(' ' ',' and ')' explicitly.
* d/rules: run smoke test at the build time.
-- Vladimir Petko Tue, 23 Apr 2024
15:14:54 +1200
** Changed in: tcpxtract (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061027
Title:
FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tcpxtract/+bug/2061027/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063015] Re: autopkgtest fails with version 1.0.1-17ubuntu1
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~vpa1977/ubuntu/+source/tcpxtract/+git/tcpxtract/+merge/464800 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063015 Title: autopkgtest fails with version 1.0.1-17ubuntu1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tcpxtract/+bug/2063015/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2059004] Re: proposed-migration for openjdk-8 8u402-ga-2ubuntu6
rebootstrapped in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-8/8u402-ga-8build1 ** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Changed in: openjdk-8 (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2059004 Title: proposed-migration for openjdk-8 8u402-ga-2ubuntu6 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-8/+bug/2059004/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2053110] Re: openjdk-8 402 fails to install in focal, jammy, mantic on i386
I think the issue is on Ubuntu side, please do not add it to the workaround yet. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053110 Title: openjdk-8 402 fails to install in focal, jammy, mantic on i386 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/java-atk-wrapper/+bug/2053110/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063015] Re: autopkgtest fails with version 1.0.1-17ubuntu1
in ubuntu2 it is failing on armhf because yacc generated parser never hits call to 'config_type()' and does not initialise srch_machine at all. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063015 Title: autopkgtest fails with version 1.0.1-17ubuntu1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tcpxtract/+bug/2063015/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2063015] Re: autopkgtest fails with version 1.0.1-17ubuntu1
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~vpa1977/ubuntu/+source/tcpxtract/+git/tcpxtract/+merge/464726 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #945092 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=945092 ** Also affects: tcpxtract (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=945092 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063015 Title: autopkgtest fails with version 1.0.1-17ubuntu1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tcpxtract/+bug/2063015/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061089] Re: [FFe] update libheif dependencies
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1069255 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069255 ** Also affects: libheif (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069255 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061089 Title: [FFe] update libheif dependencies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/2061089/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2062018] Re: [FFe] gnutls28: merge 3.8.5-2 and backport RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 fix
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~adrien-n/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/+git/gnutls28/+merge/464535 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062018 Title: [FFe] gnutls28: merge 3.8.5-2 and backport RSAES-PKCS1-v1_5 fix To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnutls28/+bug/2062018/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061709] Re: openjdk-21: please disable jtreg autopkgtest for i386 platform
Thank you -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061709 Title: openjdk-21: please disable jtreg autopkgtest for i386 platform To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-21/+bug/2061709/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061089] Re: [FFe] update libheif dependencies
imagemagick showing sample heic image ** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2024-04-17 12-34-35.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/2061089/+attachment/5766547/+files/Screenshot%20from%202024-04-17%2012-34-35.png ** Description changed: This issue depends on Security Review of libyuv[1] [ Why it is needed ] libheif needs to pull in minimal set of dependencies for inclusion in main. Downgrade the libheif-plugin-x265 Recommends to a Suggests[2] [Build] PPA: ppa:vpa1977/libheif[3] Testing: - piuparts test [4] - check dependencies have MIR[5] - check that gimp can display heic image[6] - check that imagemagic can display heic image[7] [What can go wrong] Downgrading dependencies may impact abilities to encode/decode images and video. [ Original Description ] libheif needs to pull in minimal set of dependencies for inclusion in main. Downgrade the libheif-plugin-x265 Recommends to a Suggests https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/1827442/comments/53 libheif is required by libgd2 HEIF files. This will enable viewing of photos from iPhone and other modern smartphones with HEIF format on Ubuntu. See MIR for more details - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/1827442 [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libyuv/+bug/2004516 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/1827442/comments/53 [3] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/libheif/+packages [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/2061089/comments/3 [5] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/2061089/comments/4 - [6] - [7] + [6] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/2061089/comments/5 + [7] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/2061089/comments/6 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061089 Title: [FFe] update libheif dependencies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/2061089/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061089] Re: [FFe] update libheif dependencies
Check that all universe dependencies have MIR in progress: --- root@enabling-deer:~# apt-add-repository ppa:vpa1977/libheif root@enabling-deer:~# apt install libheif1 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree... Done Reading state information... Done The following additional packages will be installed: libaom3 libde265-0 libheif-plugin-aomdec libheif-plugin-aomenc libheif-plugin-libde265 libsharpyuv0 Suggested packages: libheif-plugin-x265 libheif-plugin-ffmpegdec libheif-plugin-jpegdec libheif-plugin-jpegenc libheif-plugin-j2kdec libheif-plugin-j2kenc libheif-plugin-rav1e libheif-plugin-svtenc The following NEW packages will be installed: libaom3 libde265-0 libheif-plugin-aomdec libheif-plugin-aomenc libheif-plugin-libde265 libheif1 libsharpyuv0 0 upgraded, 7 newly installed, 0 to remove and 28 not upgraded. Need to get 2440 kB of archives. After this operation, 6867 kB of additional disk space will be used. root@enabling-deer:~# rmadison -s noble libaom3 libde265-0 libheif-plugin-aomdec libheif-plugin-aomenc libheif-plugin-libde265 libheif1 libsharpyuv0 libaom3 | 3.8.2-2build1 | noble/universe | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x libde265-0 | 1.0.15-1build3 | noble/universe | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x libheif-plugin-aomdec | 1.17.6-1ubuntu3 | noble/universe | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x libheif-plugin-aomenc | 1.17.6-1ubuntu3 | noble/universe | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x libheif-plugin-libde265 | 1.17.6-1ubuntu3 | noble/universe | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x libheif1| 1.17.6-1ubuntu3 | noble/universe | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x libsharpyuv0| 1.3.2-0.4build3 | noble | amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x --- aom MIR[1] libde265 MIR [2] libheif MIR [3] [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aom/+bug/2004442 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libde265/+bug/2004449 [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/1827442 ** Description changed: This issue depends on Security Review of libyuv[1] [ Why it is needed ] libheif needs to pull in minimal set of dependencies for inclusion in main. Downgrade the libheif-plugin-x265 Recommends to a Suggests[2] [Build] PPA: ppa:vpa1977/libheif[3] Testing: - piuparts test [4] - - check piuparts log only main dependencies are installed - - check that gimp can display heic image - - check that imagemagic can display heic image + - check dependencies have MIR[5] + - check that gimp can display heic image[6] + - check that imagemagic can display heic image[7] [What can go wrong] Downgrading dependencies may impact abilities to encode/decode images and video. [ Original Description ] libheif needs to pull in minimal set of dependencies for inclusion in main. Downgrade the libheif-plugin-x265 Recommends to a Suggests https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/1827442/comments/53 libheif is required by libgd2 HEIF files. This will enable viewing of photos from iPhone and other modern smartphones with HEIF format on Ubuntu. See MIR for more details - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/1827442 [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libyuv/+bug/2004516 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/1827442/comments/53 [3] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/libheif/+packages + [4] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/2061089/comments/3 + [5] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/2061089/comments/4 + [6] + [7] -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061089 Title: [FFe] update libheif dependencies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/2061089/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061089] Re: [FFe] update libheif dependencies
gimp showing heic image ** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2024-04-17 12-32-57.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/2061089/+attachment/5766546/+files/Screenshot%20from%202024-04-17%2012-32-57.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061089 Title: [FFe] update libheif dependencies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/2061089/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061089] Re: [FFe] update libheif dependencies
piuparts test (install/upgrade/purge) pass ** Attachment added: "piutest-full-libheif.log.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/2061089/+attachment/5766545/+files/piutest-full-libheif.log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061089 Title: [FFe] update libheif dependencies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/2061089/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061089] Re: [FFe] update libheif dependencies
** Description changed: + + This issue depends on Security Review of libyuv[1] + + [ Why it is needed ] + libheif needs to pull in minimal set of dependencies for inclusion in - main. Downgrade the libheif-plugin-x265 Recommends to a Suggests + main. Downgrade the libheif-plugin-x265 Recommends to a Suggests[2] + + + [Build] + + PPA: ppa:vpa1977/libheif[3] + + Testing: + - piuparts test [4] + - check piuparts log only main dependencies are installed + - check that gimp can display heic image + - check that imagemagic can display heic image + + [What can go wrong] + + Removing dependencies may impact abilities to encode/decode images and + video. + + + [ Original Description ] + libheif needs to pull in minimal set of dependencies for inclusion in main. Downgrade the libheif-plugin-x265 Recommends to a Suggests https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/1827442/comments/53 libheif is required by libgd2 HEIF files. This will enable viewing of photos from iPhone and other modern smartphones with HEIF format on Ubuntu. See MIR for more details - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/1827442 + + + [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libyuv/+bug/2004516 + [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/1827442/comments/53 + [3] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/libheif/+packages ** Description changed: - This issue depends on Security Review of libyuv[1] [ Why it is needed ] libheif needs to pull in minimal set of dependencies for inclusion in main. Downgrade the libheif-plugin-x265 Recommends to a Suggests[2] - [Build] PPA: ppa:vpa1977/libheif[3] Testing: - - piuparts test [4] - - check piuparts log only main dependencies are installed - - check that gimp can display heic image - - check that imagemagic can display heic image + - piuparts test [4] + - check piuparts log only main dependencies are installed + - check that gimp can display heic image + - check that imagemagic can display heic image [What can go wrong] - Removing dependencies may impact abilities to encode/decode images and - video. + Downgrading dependencies may impact abilities to encode/decode images + and video. - - [ Original Description ] + [ Original Description ] libheif needs to pull in minimal set of dependencies for inclusion in main. Downgrade the libheif-plugin-x265 Recommends to a Suggests https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/1827442/comments/53 libheif is required by libgd2 HEIF files. This will enable viewing of photos from iPhone and other modern smartphones with HEIF format on Ubuntu. See MIR for more details - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/1827442 - [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libyuv/+bug/2004516 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/1827442/comments/53 [3] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/libheif/+packages -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061089 Title: [FFe] update libheif dependencies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/2061089/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061090] Re: [FFe] add libheif as a dependency
** Description changed: + This issue depends on libheif update[1] as well as security review for + libyuv[2] + + [Why it is needed] + + libheif is ready to be included in main. Drop delta which removes + libheif as a dependencey. This will enable decoding HEIF files by + libgd2. See MIR for more details[3] + + [Build] + + PPA: ppa:vpa1977/libheif[4] + + Testing: + - piuparts test [5] + - check piuparts log that libheif is installed (passes)[5]. + + [What can go wrong] + + libheif might pull in unexpected dependencies. Validate that MIR is + completed for libheif dependencies in the scope of[1] testing. + + + [Original Description] + libheif is ready to be included in main. Drop delta which removes libheif as a dependencey. This will enable decoding HEIF files by libgd2. See MIR for more details - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/1827442 This exception should be considered in conjunction with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/2061089 + + + [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/2061089 + [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libyuv/+bug/2004516 + [3] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/1827442 + [4] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/libheif/+packages + [5] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgd2/+bug/2061090/comments/2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061090 Title: [FFe] add libheif as a dependency To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgd2/+bug/2061090/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061090] Re: [FFe] add libheif as a dependency
piuparts test (install/upgrade/purge) pass ** Attachment added: "piutest-libgd2.log.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgd2/+bug/2061090/+attachment/5766534/+files/piutest-libgd2.log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061090 Title: [FFe] add libheif as a dependency To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgd2/+bug/2061090/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061090] Re: [FFe] add libheif as a dependency
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~vpa1977/ubuntu/+source/libgd2/+git/libgd2/+merge/464468 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061090 Title: [FFe] add libheif as a dependency To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgd2/+bug/2061090/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061089] Re: [FFe] update libheif dependencies
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~vpa1977/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+git/libheif/+merge/464467 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061089 Title: [FFe] update libheif dependencies To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/2061089/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061089] Re: [FFe] update libheif dependencies
Also we need to swap ' libheif-plugin-aomdec (= ${binary:Version}) |
libheif-plugin-dav1d (= ${binary:Version}),'
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061089
Title:
[FFe] update libheif dependencies
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libheif/+bug/2061089/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060246] Re: [FFe] Packaged VisualVM version (2.1.6) in Noble beta is incompatible with default java version (21)
piuparts test (install/upgrade/purge) pass ** Attachment added: "piutest-visualvm.log.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/+attachment/5765977/+files/piutest-visualvm.log.gz ** Description changed: [Why It is necessary] VisualVM 2.1.6 is not compatible with Java 21: Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; We need to upgrade to visualvm 2.1.8 to include support for Java 21 (default JDK) and Java 22 (shipped with Noble). [Changelog] - Release 2.1.7[1] - Release 2.1.8[2] [Build] PPA: ppa:vpa1977/visualvm[3] Build log[4] [Testing] - lintian: P: visualvm source: maintainer-desktop-entry [debian/visualvm.desktop] P: visualvm source: maintainer-manual-page [debian/visualvm.1] - piuparts test[5] - smoke test (profile tomcat).[6][7] [Where the problems can occur] visualvm is a leaf package with no reverse dependencies. Current version (2.1.6) can not be run by default-jdk. Upstream visualvm depends on netbeans platform 19, where noble has 18 packaged. This will make plugins that require specific versions of netbeans API uninstallable: - VisualVM-Coherence: this plug-in provides a GUI to allow developers to view information about a running Coherence Cluster. - VisualVM-JFR Streaming: support for Java Flight Recorder event streaming. [Original Description] Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; From that website, I see that version 2.1.7 is required for Java 21 support (and a newer 2.1.8 release adds Java 22 support). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: visualvm 2.1.6-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-11.11-generic 6.8.0-rc4 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-11-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Thu Apr 4 15:30:22 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-03-26 (10 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240323) PackageArchitecture: all RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks. SourcePackage: visualvm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/comments/2 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/comments/3 [3] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/visualvm [4] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/visualvm/+sourcepub/15970292/+listing-archive-extra - [5] + [5] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/comments/4 [6] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/visualvm/uploads/d35f4b7d8ddaddbeccfeaae6fe66a2cb/image.png [7] https://salsa.debian.org/java-team/visualvm/uploads/225d966fd9caca510951051d7006b319/image.png ** Description changed: [Why It is necessary] VisualVM 2.1.6 is not compatible with Java 21: Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; We need to upgrade to visualvm 2.1.8 to include support for Java 21 (default JDK) and Java 22 (shipped with Noble). [Changelog] - Release 2.1.7[1] - Release 2.1.8[2] [Build] PPA: ppa:vpa1977/visualvm[3] Build log[4] [Testing] - lintian: P: visualvm source: maintainer-desktop-entry [debian/visualvm.desktop] P: visualvm source: maintainer-manual-page [debian/visualvm.1] - piuparts test[5] - - smoke test (profile tomcat).[6][7] + - smoke test (profile tomcat). + - launched visualvm + - started tomcat instance + - profiled tomcat cpu usage[6][7] [Where the problems can occur] visualvm is a leaf package with no reverse dependencies. Current version (2.1.6) can not be run by default-jdk. Upstream visualvm depends on netbeans platform 19, where noble has 18 packaged. This will make
[Bug 2060246] Re: [FFe] Packaged VisualVM version (2.1.6) in Noble beta is incompatible with default java version (21)
** Description changed: [Why It is necessary] VisualVM 2.1.6 is not compatible with Java 21: Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; We need to upgrade to visualvm 2.1.8 to include support for Java 21 (default JDK) and Java 22 (shipped with Noble). [Changelog] - Release 2.1.7[1] - Release 2.1.8[2] [Build] PPA: ppa:vpa1977/visualvm[3] Build log[4] [Testing] - lintian: P: visualvm source: maintainer-desktop-entry [debian/visualvm.desktop] P: visualvm source: maintainer-manual-page [debian/visualvm.1] - piuparts test - smoke test (profile tomcat). [Where the problems can occur] visualvm is a leaf package with no reverse dependencies. Current version (2.1.6) can not be run by default-jdk. Upstream visualvm depends on netbeans platform 19, where noble has 18 packaged. - This will make plugins that require specific versions of netbeans API uninstallable. - + This will make plugins that require specific versions of netbeans API uninstallable: + - VisualVM-Coherence + - VisualVM-JFR Streaming [Original Description] Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; From that website, I see that version 2.1.7 is required for Java 21 support (and a newer 2.1.8 release adds Java 22 support). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: visualvm 2.1.6-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-11.11-generic 6.8.0-rc4 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-11-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Thu Apr 4 15:30:22 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-03-26 (10 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240323) PackageArchitecture: all RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks. SourcePackage: visualvm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/comments/2 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/comments/3 [3] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/visualvm [4] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/visualvm/+sourcepub/15970292/+listing-archive-extra ** Description changed: [Why It is necessary] VisualVM 2.1.6 is not compatible with Java 21: Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; We need to upgrade to visualvm 2.1.8 to include support for Java 21 (default JDK) and Java 22 (shipped with Noble). [Changelog] - Release 2.1.7[1] - Release 2.1.8[2] [Build] PPA: ppa:vpa1977/visualvm[3] Build log[4] [Testing] - lintian: P: visualvm source: maintainer-desktop-entry [debian/visualvm.desktop] P: visualvm source: maintainer-manual-page [debian/visualvm.1] - piuparts test - smoke test (profile tomcat). [Where the problems can occur] visualvm is a leaf package with no reverse dependencies. Current version (2.1.6) can not be run by default-jdk. Upstream visualvm depends on netbeans platform 19, where noble has 18 packaged. This will make plugins that require specific versions of netbeans API uninstallable: - - VisualVM-Coherence - - VisualVM-JFR Streaming + - VisualVM-Coherence: this plug-in provides a GUI to allow developers to view information about a running Coherence Cluster. + - VisualVM-JFR Streaming: support for Java Flight Recorder event streaming. [Original Description] Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more
[Bug 2061709] [NEW] openjdk-21: please disable jtreg autopkgtest for i386 platform
Public bug reported: jtreg autopkgtests require -testsupport package that pulls in a number of dependencies for i386 platform. Due to the platform being obsoleted: - disable -testsupport package on i386 (?) - disable jtreg autopkgtest of i386 ** Affects: openjdk-21 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: fr-7446 ** Tags added: fr-7446 ** Summary changed: - please disable jtreg autopkgtest for i386 platform + openjdk-21: please disable jtreg autopkgtest for i386 platform -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061709 Title: openjdk-21: please disable jtreg autopkgtest for i386 platform To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-21/+bug/2061709/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060246] Re: [FFe] Packaged VisualVM version (2.1.6) in Noble beta is incompatible with default java version (21)
** Description changed: [Why It is necessary] VisualVM 2.1.6 is not compatible with Java 21: Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; We need to upgrade to visualvm 2.1.8 to include support for Java 21 (default JDK) and Java 22 (shipped with Noble). [Changelog] - Release 2.1.7[1] - Release 2.1.8[2] [Build] PPA: ppa:vpa1977/visualvm[3] Build log[4] [Testing] - lintian: P: visualvm source: maintainer-desktop-entry [debian/visualvm.desktop] P: visualvm source: maintainer-manual-page [debian/visualvm.1] - piuparts test - smoke test (profile tomcat). [Where the problems can occur] visualvm is a leaf package with no reverse dependencies. Current version (2.1.6) can not be run by default-jdk. - New release may introduce regressions when ran with previous versions of - jdk. + Upstream visualvm depends on netbeans platform 19, where noble has 18 packaged. + This will make plugins that require specific versions of netbeans API uninstallable. + [Original Description] Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; From that website, I see that version 2.1.7 is required for Java 21 support (and a newer 2.1.8 release adds Java 22 support). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: visualvm 2.1.6-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-11.11-generic 6.8.0-rc4 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-11-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Thu Apr 4 15:30:22 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-03-26 (10 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240323) PackageArchitecture: all RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks. SourcePackage: visualvm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/comments/2 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/comments/3 [3] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/visualvm [4] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/visualvm/+sourcepub/15970292/+listing-archive-extra -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060246 Title: [FFe] Packaged VisualVM version (2.1.6) in Noble beta is incompatible with default java version (21) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060246] Re: [FFe] Packaged VisualVM version (2.1.6) in Noble beta is incompatible with default java version (21)
** Description changed: [Why It is necessary] VisualVM 2.1.6 is not compatible with Java 21: Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; We need to upgrade to visualvm 2.1.8 to include support for Java 21 (default JDK) and Java 22 (shipped with Noble). [Changelog] - Release 2.1.7[1] - Release 2.1.8[2] [Build] PPA: ppa:vpa1977/visualvm[3] Build log[4] [Testing] - lintian: P: visualvm source: maintainer-desktop-entry [debian/visualvm.desktop] P: visualvm source: maintainer-manual-page [debian/visualvm.1] - piuparts test - smoke test (profile tomcat). [Where the problems can occur] - visualvm is a leaf package with no reverse dependencies. + visualvm is a leaf package with no reverse dependencies. Current version (2.1.6) can not be run by default-jdk. New release may introduce regressions when ran with previous versions of jdk. - [Original Description] Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; From that website, I see that version 2.1.7 is required for Java 21 support (and a newer 2.1.8 release adds Java 22 support). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: visualvm 2.1.6-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-11.11-generic 6.8.0-rc4 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-11-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Thu Apr 4 15:30:22 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-03-26 (10 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240323) PackageArchitecture: all RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks. SourcePackage: visualvm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/comments/2 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/comments/3 [3] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/visualvm + [4] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/visualvm/+sourcepub/15970292/+listing-archive-extra -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060246 Title: [FFe] Packaged VisualVM version (2.1.6) in Noble beta is incompatible with default java version (21) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060246] Re: [FFe] Packaged VisualVM version (2.1.6) in Noble beta is incompatible with default java version (21)
** Description changed: [Why It is necessary] VisualVM 2.1.6 is not compatible with Java 21: Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; We need to upgrade to visualvm 2.1.8 to include support for Java 21 (default JDK) and Java 22 (shipped with Noble). [Changelog] - Release 2.1.7[1] - Release 2.1.8[2] [Build] PPA: ppa:vpa1977/visualvm[3] Build log[4] [Testing] - lintian: P: visualvm source: maintainer-desktop-entry [debian/visualvm.desktop] P: visualvm source: maintainer-manual-page [debian/visualvm.1] - piuparts test - smoke test (profile tomcat). [Where the problems can occur] + visualvm is a leaf package with no reverse dependencies. + Current version (2.1.6) can not be run by default-jdk. + + New release may introduce regressions when ran with previous versions of + jdk. + [Original Description] Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; From that website, I see that version 2.1.7 is required for Java 21 support (and a newer 2.1.8 release adds Java 22 support). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: visualvm 2.1.6-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-11.11-generic 6.8.0-rc4 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-11-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Thu Apr 4 15:30:22 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-03-26 (10 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240323) PackageArchitecture: all RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks. SourcePackage: visualvm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/comments/2 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/comments/3 [3] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/visualvm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060246 Title: [FFe] Packaged VisualVM version (2.1.6) in Noble beta is incompatible with default java version (21) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060246] Re: [FFe] Packaged VisualVM version (2.1.6) in Noble beta is incompatible with default java version (21)
** Description changed: [Why It is necessary] - Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: + VisualVM 2.1.6 is not compatible with Java 21: + + Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs + java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java + 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message + stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; We need to upgrade to visualvm 2.1.8 to include support for Java 21 (default JDK) and Java 22 (shipped with Noble). [Changelog] - Release 2.1.7[1] - Release 2.1.8[2] [Build] PPA: ppa:vpa1977/visualvm[3] Build log[4] [Testing] - lintian: P: visualvm source: maintainer-desktop-entry [debian/visualvm.desktop] P: visualvm source: maintainer-manual-page [debian/visualvm.1] - piuparts test - smoke test (profile tomcat). [Original Description] Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; From that website, I see that version 2.1.7 is required for Java 21 support (and a newer 2.1.8 release adds Java 22 support). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: visualvm 2.1.6-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-11.11-generic 6.8.0-rc4 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-11-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Thu Apr 4 15:30:22 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-03-26 (10 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240323) PackageArchitecture: all RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks. SourcePackage: visualvm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/comments/2 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/comments/3 [3] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/visualvm ** Description changed: [Why It is necessary] VisualVM 2.1.6 is not compatible with Java 21: Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; We need to upgrade to visualvm 2.1.8 to include support for Java 21 (default JDK) and Java 22 (shipped with Noble). [Changelog] - Release 2.1.7[1] - Release 2.1.8[2] [Build] PPA: ppa:vpa1977/visualvm[3] Build log[4] [Testing] - lintian: P: visualvm source: maintainer-desktop-entry [debian/visualvm.desktop] P: visualvm source: maintainer-manual-page [debian/visualvm.1] - piuparts test - smoke test (profile tomcat). + [Where the problems can occur] + + [Original Description] Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; From that website, I see that version 2.1.7 is required for Java 21 support (and a newer 2.1.8 release adds Java 22 support). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: visualvm 2.1.6-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-11.11-generic 6.8.0-rc4 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-11-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Thu Apr 4 15:30:22 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-03-26 (10 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240323) PackageArchitecture: all RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks. SourcePackage: visualvm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) [1]
[Bug 2060246] Re: [FFe] Packaged VisualVM version (2.1.6) in Noble beta is incompatible with default java version (21)
** Description changed: [Why It is necessary] Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; We need to upgrade to visualvm 2.1.8 to include support for Java 21 (default JDK) and Java 22 (shipped with Noble). [Changelog] - Release 2.1.7[1] - Release 2.1.8[2] - [Build] PPA: ppa:vpa1977/visualvm[3] Build log[4] [Testing] - - piuparts test + - lintian: + P: visualvm source: maintainer-desktop-entry [debian/visualvm.desktop] + P: visualvm source: maintainer-manual-page [debian/visualvm.1] + - piuparts test - smoke test (profile tomcat). - [Original Description] Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; From that website, I see that version 2.1.7 is required for Java 21 support (and a newer 2.1.8 release adds Java 22 support). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: visualvm 2.1.6-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-11.11-generic 6.8.0-rc4 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-11-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Thu Apr 4 15:30:22 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-03-26 (10 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240323) PackageArchitecture: all RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks. SourcePackage: visualvm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/comments/2 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/comments/3 [3] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/visualvm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060246 Title: [FFe] Packaged VisualVM version (2.1.6) in Noble beta is incompatible with default java version (21) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060246] Re: [FFe] Packaged VisualVM version (2.1.6) in Noble beta is incompatible with default java version (21)
VisualVM 2.1.6 to 2.1.7 changelog ** Description changed: - Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs - java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java - 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message - stating: + [Why It is necessary] + Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: + + "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. + + Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about + requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; + + We need to upgrade to visualvm 2.1.8 to include support for Java 21 + (default JDK) and Java 22 (shipped with Noble). + + [Changelog] + - release 2.1.7[1] + - release 2.1.8[2] + + + + [Original Description] + Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; From that website, I see that version 2.1.7 is required for Java 21 support (and a newer 2.1.8 release adds Java 22 support). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: visualvm 2.1.6-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-11.11-generic 6.8.0-rc4 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-11-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Thu Apr 4 15:30:22 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-03-26 (10 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240323) PackageArchitecture: all RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks. SourcePackage: visualvm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) ** Attachment added: "release217.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/+attachment/5765849/+files/release217.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060246 Title: [FFe] Packaged VisualVM version (2.1.6) in Noble beta is incompatible with default java version (21) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060246] Re: [FFe] Packaged VisualVM version (2.1.6) in Noble beta is incompatible with default java version (21)
VisualVM 2.1.7 to 2.1.8 changelog ** Attachment added: "release218.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/+attachment/5765850/+files/release218.txt ** Description changed: [Why It is necessary] Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; We need to upgrade to visualvm 2.1.8 to include support for Java 21 (default JDK) and Java 22 (shipped with Noble). [Changelog] - - release 2.1.7[1] - - release 2.1.8[2] - - + - release 2.1.7[1] + - release 2.1.8[2] [Original Description] Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; From that website, I see that version 2.1.7 is required for Java 21 support (and a newer 2.1.8 release adds Java 22 support). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: visualvm 2.1.6-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-11.11-generic 6.8.0-rc4 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-11-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Thu Apr 4 15:30:22 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-03-26 (10 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240323) PackageArchitecture: all RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks. SourcePackage: visualvm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) + + + [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/comments/2 + [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/comments/3 ** Description changed: [Why It is necessary] Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; We need to upgrade to visualvm 2.1.8 to include support for Java 21 (default JDK) and Java 22 (shipped with Noble). [Changelog] - - release 2.1.7[1] - - release 2.1.8[2] + + - Release 2.1.7[1] + - Release 2.1.8[2] + + + [Build] + + PPA: ppa:vpa1977/visualvm[3] + + Build log[4] + + [Testing] + - piuparts test + - smoke test (profile tomcat). + [Original Description] Installing VisualVM via the apt on noble beta automatically installs java 21, but the packaged version of VisualVM (2.1.6) only supports Java 20 and below. When you try to launch it, you get a pop up message stating: "You are running VisualVM using an unsupported Java version: 21. Please use JDK 8 to JDK20 to run VisualVM. For more information about requirements and setup visit https://visualvm.github.io.; From that website, I see that version 2.1.7 is required for Java 21 support (and a newer 2.1.8 release adds Java 22 support). ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 24.04 Package: visualvm 2.1.6-1 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.8.0-11.11-generic 6.8.0-rc4 Uname: Linux 6.8.0-11-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.0-0ubuntu1 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Thu Apr 4 15:30:22 2024 InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-03-26 (10 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Daily amd64 (20240323) PackageArchitecture: all RebootRequiredPkgs: Error: path contained symlinks. SourcePackage: visualvm UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) - [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/comments/2 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/comments/3 + [3] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/visualvm -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060246 Title: [FFe] Packaged VisualVM version (2.1.6) in Noble beta is incompatible with default java version (21) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing
[Bug 2060246] Re: [FFe] Packaged VisualVM version (2.1.6) in Noble beta is incompatible with default java version (21)
** Summary changed: - Packaged VisualVM version (2.1.6) in Noble beta is incompatible with default java version (21) + [FFe] Packaged VisualVM version (2.1.6) in Noble beta is incompatible with default java version (21) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060246 Title: [FFe] Packaged VisualVM version (2.1.6) in Noble beta is incompatible with default java version (21) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/visualvm/+bug/2060246/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061363] [NEW] libnb-platform18-java is unable to set security manager with default jdk
Public bug reported: When preparing an upgrade to VisualVM 2.1.8 I encountered the following exception: -- $visualvm java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: The Security Manager is deprecated and will be removed in a future release at java.base/java.lang.System.setSecurityManager(System.java:430) at org.netbeans.TopSecurityManager.install(Unknown Source) at org.netbeans.core.NbLifecycleManager.advancePolicy(Unknown Source) at org.netbeans.core.GuiRunLevel.run(Unknown Source) at org.netbeans.core.startup.Main.start(Unknown Source) at org.netbeans.core.startup.TopThreadGroup.run(Unknown Source) at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583) --- This is caused by Java 21 changes and is already fixed upstream[1] [1] https://github.com/apache/netbeans/commit/4c9d9492f70b09aaeae2b8b10fc26ae29433d667 ** Affects: libnb-platform18-java (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: libnb-platform18-java (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Description changed: - When preparing upgrade to VisualVM 2.1.8 I have encountered the following exception: + When preparing an upgrade to VisualVM 2.1.8 I encountered the following exception: -- $visualvm java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException: The Security Manager is deprecated and will be removed in a future release - at java.base/java.lang.System.setSecurityManager(System.java:430) - at org.netbeans.TopSecurityManager.install(Unknown Source) - at org.netbeans.core.NbLifecycleManager.advancePolicy(Unknown Source) - at org.netbeans.core.GuiRunLevel.run(Unknown Source) - at org.netbeans.core.startup.Main.start(Unknown Source) - at org.netbeans.core.startup.TopThreadGroup.run(Unknown Source) - at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583) + at java.base/java.lang.System.setSecurityManager(System.java:430) + at org.netbeans.TopSecurityManager.install(Unknown Source) + at org.netbeans.core.NbLifecycleManager.advancePolicy(Unknown Source) + at org.netbeans.core.GuiRunLevel.run(Unknown Source) + at org.netbeans.core.startup.Main.start(Unknown Source) + at org.netbeans.core.startup.TopThreadGroup.run(Unknown Source) + at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:1583) --- This is caused by Java 21 changes and is already fixed upstream[1] - - [1] https://github.com/apache/netbeans/commit/4c9d9492f70b09aaeae2b8b10fc26ae29433d667 + [1] + https://github.com/apache/netbeans/commit/4c9d9492f70b09aaeae2b8b10fc26ae29433d667 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1069015 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069015 ** Also affects: libnb-platform18-java (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1069015 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061363 Title: libnb-platform18-java is unable to set security manager with default jdk To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnb-platform18-java/+bug/2061363/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061331] Re: spotlighter fails to build due to -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1066355 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066355 ** Also affects: spotlighter (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066355 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061331 Title: spotlighter fails to build due to -Werror=implicit-function- declaration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spotlighter/+bug/2061331/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061331] [NEW] spotlighter fails to build due to -Werror=implicit-function-declaration
Public bug reported: See [1] --- spotlighter.c:105:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘on_window_screen_changed’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] 105 | on_window_screen_changed (window, NULL, NULL); | ^~~~ --- [1] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724118867/buildlog_ubuntu-noble- armhf.spotlighter_0.3-1.1build3_BUILDING.txt.gz ** Affects: spotlighter (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061331 Title: spotlighter fails to build due to -Werror=implicit-function- declaration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/spotlighter/+bug/2061331/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061033] Re: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~vpa1977/ubuntu/+source/sniffit/+git/sniffit/+merge/464250 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061033 Title: FTBFS on armfh - implicit-function-declaration To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sniffit/+bug/2061033/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060908] Re: ncrack ftbfs on armhf due to implicit declarations in configure script
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~vpa1977/ubuntu/+source/ncrack/+git/ncrack/+merge/464185 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060908 Title: ncrack ftbfs on armhf due to implicit declarations in configure script To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ncrack/+bug/2060908/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061321] Re: please sync plantuml 1:1.2020.2+ds-4 from Debian unstable
smoke test fails: $plantuml Exception in thread "main" java.lang.RuntimeException: Fontconfig head is null, check your fonts or fonts configuration at java.desktop/sun.awt.FontConfiguration.getVersion(FontConfiguration.java:1263) at java.desktop/sun.awt.FontConfiguration.readFontConfigFile(FontConfiguration.java:221) at java.desktop/sun.awt.FontConfiguration.init(FontConfiguration.java:105) at java.desktop/sun.awt.X11FontManager.createFontConfiguration(X11FontManager.java:696) at java.desktop/sun.font.SunFontManager$2.run(SunFontManager.java:352) at java.desktop/sun.font.SunFontManager$2.run(SunFontManager.java:309) at java.base/java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(AccessController.java:319) at java.desktop/sun.font.SunFontManager.(SunFontManager.java:309) at java.desktop/sun.awt.FcFontManager.(FcFontManager.java:35) at java.desktop/sun.awt.X11FontManager.(X11FontManager.java:55) at java.desktop/sun.font.PlatformFontInfo.createFontManager(PlatformFontInfo.java:37) at java.desktop/sun.font.FontManagerFactory.getInstance(FontManagerFactory.java:51) at java.desktop/sun.font.SunFontManager.getInstance(SunFontManager.java:242) at java.desktop/sun.font.FontDesignMetrics.getMetrics(FontDesignMetrics.java:260) at java.desktop/sun.java2d.SunGraphics2D.getFontMetrics(SunGraphics2D.java:870) at net.sourceforge.plantuml.Run.forceOpenJdkResourceLoad(Run.java:230) at net.sourceforge.plantuml.Run.main(Run.java:137) ** Changed in: plantuml (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061321 Title: please sync plantuml 1:1.2020.2+ds-4 from Debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plantuml/+bug/2061321/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061321] [NEW] please sync plantuml 1:1.2020.2+ds-4 from Debian unstable
Public bug reported: plantuml 1:1.2020.2+ds-4 fixes missing dependencies issue[2] in Debian. There are no other changes. ppa: ppa:vpa1977/october-21 [1] Testing: - ppa build succeeds[3] [1] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/october-21 [2] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2060267 [3] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/october-21/+sourcepub/15929544/+listing-archive-extra ** Affects: plantuml (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Description changed: - plantuml 1:1.2020.2+ds-4 fixes missing dependencies issue[2] in Debian. + plantuml 1:1.2020.2+ds-4 fixes missing dependencies issue[2] in Debian. There are no other changes. ppa: ppa:vpa1977/october-21 [1] + Testing: + - ppa build succeeds[3] [1] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/october-21 [2] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2060267 + [3] https://launchpad.net/~vpa1977/+archive/ubuntu/october-21/+sourcepub/15929544/+listing-archive-extra -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061321 Title: please sync plantuml 1:1.2020.2+ds-4 from Debian unstable To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plantuml/+bug/2061321/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060825] Re: hxtools ftbfs in Noble
Uploaded, thank you!!! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060825 Title: hxtools ftbfs in Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hxtools/+bug/2060825/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060825] Re: hxtools ftbfs in Noble
sudipmuk: Would it be possible to forward the patch to Debian? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060825 Title: hxtools ftbfs in Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hxtools/+bug/2060825/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060728] Re: gpsh fails to run in Noble
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~vpa1977/ubuntu/+source/hxtools/+git/hxtools/+merge/464152 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060728 Title: gpsh fails to run in Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hxtools/+bug/2060728/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060825] Re: hxtools ftbfs in Noble
I have added a merge proposal and uploaded package to ppa for testing. ** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~vpa1977/ubuntu/+source/hxtools/+git/hxtools/+merge/464152 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060825 Title: hxtools ftbfs in Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/hxtools/+bug/2060825/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2061037] Re: ruby-fusefs FTBFS on Noble
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/ubuntu/+source/ruby-fusefs/+git/ruby-fusefs/+merge/464150 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061037 Title: ruby-fusefs FTBFS on Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-fusefs/+bug/2061037/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2053256] Re: [FFe] Update lcm to 1.5 for Noble
Package uploaded, unsubscribing Sponsors. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2053256 Title: [FFe] Update lcm to 1.5 for Noble To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lcm/+bug/2053256/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060908] Re: ncrack ftbfs on armhf due to implicit declarations in configure script
** Summary changed: - ncract ftbfs on armhf due to implicit declarations in configure script + ncrack ftbfs on armhf due to implicit declarations in configure script ** Tags added: ftbfs time-t update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060908 Title: ncrack ftbfs on armhf due to implicit declarations in configure script To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ncrack/+bug/2060908/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060908] [NEW] ncract ftbfs on armhf due to implicit declarations in configure script
Public bug reported: See[1] checking for seccomp architecture... "AUDIT_ARCH_ARM" checking compiler and flags for sanity... no configure: error: *** compiler cannot create working executables, check config.log *** configure: error: ./configure failed for opensshlib tail -v -n \+0 config.log ==> config.log <== This file contains any messages produced by compilers whil --- checking for seccomp architecture... "AUDIT_ARCH_ARM" checking compiler and flags for sanity... no configure: error: *** compiler cannot create working executables, check config.log *** configure: error: ./configure failed for opensshlib tail -v -n \+0 config.log --- [1] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724118158/buildlog_ubuntu-noble- armhf.ncrack_0.7+debian-5build2_BUILDING.txt.gz ** Affects: ncrack (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Affects: ncrack (Debian) Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1065799 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065799 ** Also affects: ncrack (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065799 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060908 Title: ncract ftbfs on armhf due to implicit declarations in configure script To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ncrack/+bug/2060908/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058985] Re: proposed-migration for iraf-fitsutil 2018.07.06-6build1
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1068791 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068791 ** Also affects: iraf-fitsutil (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068791 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058985 Title: proposed-migration for iraf-fitsutil 2018.07.06-6build1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iraf-fitsutil/+bug/2058985/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058985] Re: proposed-migration for iraf-fitsutil 2018.07.06-6build1
** Description changed: iraf-fitsutil 2018.07.06-6build1 is built in -proposed but not on armhf. This will not block migration because armhf binaries are being removed from the release pocket, but unless addressed will regress armhf availability of this package in 24.04 LTS. + + The tests fail[1] due to segmentation fault in fgread/fgwrite functions: + --- + Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. + 0x0040284e in sprintf (__fmt=0x405160 "%d-%2.2d-%2.2dT%2.2d:%2.2d:%2.2d", __s=0xfffef18c "2024-04-10T23:34:55") + at /usr/include/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bits/stdio2.h:30 + warning: Source file is more recent than executable. + 30 return __builtin___sprintf_chk (__s, __USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1, + (gdb) where + #0 0x0040284e in sprintf (__fmt=0x405160 "%d-%2.2d-%2.2dT%2.2d:%2.2d:%2.2d", __s=0xfffef18c "2024-04-10T23:34:55") + at /usr/include/arm-linux-gnueabihf/bits/stdio2.h:30 + #1 fgfileout (fname=fname@entry=0xfffef77d "pix.fits", out=1, ftype=6, path=path@entry=0x405318 "", level=level@entry=1) + at fgwrite.c:695 + #2 0x00400f7e in main (argc=, argv=) at fgwrite.c:360 + (gdb) down + Bottom (innermost) frame selected; you cannot go down. + (gdb) up + #1 fgfileout (fname=fname@entry=0xfffef77d "pix.fits", out=1, ftype=6, path=path@entry=0x405318 "", level=level@entry=1) + at fgwrite.c:695 + warning: 695 fgwrite.c: No such file or directory + (gdb) print tm + $1 = (struct tm *) 0x0 + --- + Structure fheader uses long to represent timestamps causing a failure to obtain theproper timestamp. + + + [1] https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest-noble/noble/armhf/i/iraf-fitsutil/20240408_131637_f974b@/log.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058985 Title: proposed-migration for iraf-fitsutil 2018.07.06-6build1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/iraf-fitsutil/+bug/2058985/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060881] Re: please remove gshutdown from noble (noble-proposed)
** Description changed: - The package is already removed from Noble release. - gshutdown fails to build on all platform due to missing header file dependency[1] - The upstream is defunct (gshutdown.tuxfamily.org is not accessible). - There is a fork available[2] with the last update 2 years ago. + The upstream is defunct (gshutdown.tuxfamily.org is not accessible). + There is a fork available[2] with the last update 2 years ago. The package has no reverse dependencies (checked in mantic, as it is already gone from noble) $reverse-depends -r mantic src:gshutdown No reverse dependencies found $reverse-depends -b -r mantic src:gshutdown No reverse dependencies found - [1] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724013049/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-amd64.gshutdown_0.2-0ubuntu15_BUILDING.txt.gz [2] https://github.com/Asher256/gshutdown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060881 Title: please remove gshutdown from noble (noble-proposed) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gshutdown/+bug/2060881/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2021566] Re: JRE Crashes in JDK 11.0.19+7
Marking invalid as the issue can not be reproduced. ** Changed in: openjdk-lts (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2021566 Title: JRE Crashes in JDK 11.0.19+7 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openjdk-lts/+bug/2021566/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060881] [NEW] please remove gshutdown from noble (noble-proposed)
Public bug reported: The package is already removed from Noble release. gshutdown fails to build on all platform due to missing header file dependency[1] The upstream is defunct (gshutdown.tuxfamily.org is not accessible). There is a fork available[2] with the last update 2 years ago. The package has no reverse dependencies (checked in mantic, as it is already gone from noble) $reverse-depends -r mantic src:gshutdown No reverse dependencies found $reverse-depends -b -r mantic src:gshutdown No reverse dependencies found [1] https://launchpadlibrarian.net/724013049/buildlog_ubuntu-noble-amd64.gshutdown_0.2-0ubuntu15_BUILDING.txt.gz [2] https://github.com/Asher256/gshutdown ** Affects: gshutdown (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060881 Title: please remove gshutdown from noble (noble-proposed) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gshutdown/+bug/2060881/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058966] Re: proposed-migration for collectd 5.12.0-17.1build1
The issue is not a backport[1] and was always present on armhf in openjdk-21. I have raised an upstream bug for it[2] [1] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8142362 [2] https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8329983 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058966 Title: proposed-migration for collectd 5.12.0-17.1build1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/collectd/+bug/2058966/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058966] Re: proposed-migration for collectd 5.12.0-17.1build1
Reproducer:
---
#include
int main(){
JavaVM *jvm; /* denotes a Java VM */
JNIEnv *env; /* pointer to native method interface */
JavaVMInitArgs vm_args; /* JDK/JRE 6 VM initialization arguments */
JavaVMOption* options = new JavaVMOption[1];
options[0].optionString = "-Djava.class.path=/usr/lib/java";
vm_args.version = JNI_VERSION_1_6;
vm_args.nOptions = 1;
vm_args.options = options;
vm_args.ignoreUnrecognized = false;
/* load and initialize a Java VM, return a JNI interface
* pointer in env */
JNI_CreateJavaVM(, (void**), _args);
}
---
g++ test.cpp -I/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/include -I/usr/lib/jvm/default-
java/include/linux -L/usr/lib/jvm/default-java/lib/server -ljvm
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058966
Title:
proposed-migration for collectd 5.12.0-17.1build1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/collectd/+bug/2058966/+subscriptions
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2058966] Re: proposed-migration for collectd 5.12.0-17.1build1
$ readelf -s /usr/lib/jvm/default-java/lib/server/libjvm.so | grep _Copy 84: 0 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT UND _Copy_conjoint_bytes 54701: 00711f19 480 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 12 Unsafe_CopyMemory0 54716: 00712a79 536 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 12 Unsafe_CopySwapM[...] 64467: 0051c174 0 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 12 _Copy_conjoint_j[...] 66578: 0051bd70 0 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 12 _Copy_disjoint_words 69023: 0051c178 0 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 12 _Copy_arrayof_co[...] 73507: 0051bde8 0 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 12 _Copy_conjoint_words 82170: 0051bed8 0 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 12 _Copy_conjoint_j[...] 90889: 0051c174 0 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 12 _Copy_arrayof_co[...] 91117: 0051bd6c 0 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 12 _Copy_arrayof_co[...] 91297: 0051c170 0 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 12 _Copy_arrayof_co[...] 92855: 0051c178 0 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 12 _Copy_conjoint_j[...] 96326: 0048f9f116 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 12 ___Copy_conjoint[...] 96330: 0048fa0116 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 12 ___Copy_conjoint[...] 96334: 0048fa1116 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 12 ___Copy_conjoint[...] 96338: 0048fa2116 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 12 ___Copy_disjoint[...] 96346: 0076a71916 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 12 ___Copy_conjoint[...] 96350: 0076a72916 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 12 ___Copy_disjoint[...] 96354: 0076a73916 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 12 ___Copy_conjoint[...] 96362: 0076a75916 FUNCLOCAL DEFAULT 12 ___Copy_conjoint[...] 96657: 0 FUNCGLOBAL DEFAULT UND _Copy_conjoint_bytes Rest of the copy routines are declared as LOCAL. This is caused by the following upstream commit: commit 76477f8cdbc012f7ff0670ad57067ebf304612a0 Author: Coleen Phillimore Date: Mon Jan 10 14:34:04 2022 + 8142362: Lots of code duplication in Copy class Reviewed-by: kvn, hseigel It removed the function implementation but left a declaration in src/hotspot/os_cpu/linux_arm/linux_arm_32.S .globl _Copy_conjoint_bytes .type _Copy_conjoint_bytes, %function -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2058966 Title: proposed-migration for collectd 5.12.0-17.1build1 To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/collectd/+bug/2058966/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2004449] Re: [MIR] libde265 (dependency of libheif)
The smoke test for the decoder was implemented in 1.0.12-2, we do not use encoding functionality of libde265 for the MIR purposes. This resolves the mandatory requirement for this package @slyon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2004449 Title: [MIR] libde265 (dependency of libheif) To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libde265/+bug/2004449/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
[Bug 2060247] [NEW] xen-tools autopkgtest failure
Public bug reported: xen-tools fail autopkgtest probably due to the apt sources.list changes in noble -- 1294s Result: PASS 1294s autopkgtest [20:08:35]: test functionality: ---] 1294s functionalityFAIL stderr: Couldn't find a useful entry in the sources.list files of the Dom0. Tried: 1294s autopkgtest [20:08:35]: test functionality: - - - - - - - - - - results - - - - - - - - - - 1294s autopkgtest [20:08:35]: test functionality: - - - - - - - - - - stderr - - - - - - - - - - 1294s Couldn't find a useful entry in the sources.list files of the Dom0. Tried: 1294s /etc/apt/sources.list 1294s Couldn't find a useful entry in the sources.list files of the Dom0. Tried: 1294s /etc/apt/sources.list 1294s Couldn't find a useful entry in the sources.list files of the Dom0. Tried: 1294s /etc/apt/sources.list 1294s Couldn't find a useful entry in the sources.list files of the Dom0. Tried: 1294s /etc/apt/sources.list 1294s Couldn't find a useful entry in the sources.list files of the Dom0. Tried: 1294s /etc/apt/sources.list 1294s Couldn't find a useful entry in the sources.list files of the Dom0. Tried: 1294s /etc/apt/sources.list 1294s Couldn't find a useful entry in the sources.list files of the Dom0. Tried: 1294s /etc/apt/sources.list -- [1] [1] https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest- noble/noble/amd64/x/xen-tools/20240404_202848_15320@/log.gz ** Affects: xen-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060247 Title: xen-tools autopkgtest failure To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xen-tools/+bug/2060247/+subscriptions -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
