[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.2

2020-08-24 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Tests now pass with nodejs 12.18.2~dfsg-1ubuntu2 in groovy-proposed: https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/node-sha.js/groovy/ppc64el https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/n/node-crypto-browserify/groovy/ppc64el

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.2

2020-08-19 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
I'm talking about commits 3f071e3 and 1a9c676a141b32483b48884f8cc0330e64c8e17f -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887144 Title: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.2 To

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.2

2020-08-19 Thread Gianfranco Costamagna
I'm uploading the patch suggested on the upstream tracker... -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887144 Title: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.2 To manage

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.2

2020-08-07 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Reported as an upstream Node.js bug: https://github.com/nodejs/node/issues/34666 ** Description changed: Since nodejs 12.18.1 entered groovy-proposed, autopkgtests that rely on node-sha.js to compute SHA-1 hashes started failing reliably on ppc64el. This affects the following packages:

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.2

2020-08-06 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Unfortunately, that was a red herring. I rebuilt nodejs for ppc64el with that commit reverted, but it didn't help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887144 Title: autopkgtest failures

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.2

2020-08-06 Thread Olivier Tilloy
Just a wild guess that will need testing: https://chromium- review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1649711 might be related, would reverting it help? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887144

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.2

2020-08-06 Thread Olivier Tilloy
(note that I'm not suggesting the above as a workaround, we need to dig deeper and understand where this incorrect optimization comes from) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887144

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.2

2020-08-06 Thread Olivier Tilloy
To further prove the point, adding `eval('')` to the body of ft() ensures that the function is not optimized by V8, and the tests reliably pass. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1887144

[Bug 1887144] Re: autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.2

2020-08-06 Thread Olivier Tilloy
** Summary changed: - autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.1 + autopkgtest failures on ppc64el with nodejs 12.18.2 ** Also affects: nodejs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is