libsdl2 | 2.0.14+dfsg2-3 | impish |
source
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256185
Title:
[MIR] libsdl2
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
hmm, the auto update was missing
But it is done:
This bug was fixed in the package qemu - 1:6.0+dfsg-1~ubuntu3
---
qemu (1:6.0+dfsg-1~ubuntu3) impish; urgency=medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
sndio resolved via https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu-
seeds/+git/ubuntu/+merge/405363
** Changed in: sndio (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
** Changed in: sndio (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Christian Ehrhardt (paelzer) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notificatio
Yeah this was meant to be an extra-exclude, all of this was going on for
so long that I missed to merge this before the promotion. Thanks for the
reminder Steve!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
However, https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/component-
mismatches-proposed.html also shows that libsdl2-dev depends on
libsndio-dev, which is in universe. So this also needs MIRed, or else
libsdl2-dev added to extra-excludes in the seed (which would be unusual
but not forbidden).
** Als
Override component to main
libsdl2 2.0.14+dfsg2-3 in impish: universe/misc -> main
libsdl2-2.0-0 2.0.14+dfsg2-3 in impish amd64: universe/libs/optional/100% ->
main
libsdl2-2.0-0 2.0.14+dfsg2-3 in impish arm64: universe/libs/optional/100% ->
main
libsdl2-2.0-0 2.0.14+dfsg2-3 in impish armhf: univ
After a few trials we will give it a show in qemu-system-gui for now which
means we will promote it as planned (Staying close to Debian which is +1 on my
SDL reenabling there as well).
If it turns out too buggy we will remove it, it it is (somewhat expected) great
for some but misleading for oth
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+git/qemu/+merge/404247
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256185
Title:
[MIR] libsdl2
To manage no
** Changed in: libsdl2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: libsdl2 (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256185
Title:
** Merge proposal unlinked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+git/qemu/+merge/404247
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256185
Title:
[MIR] libsdl2
To manage
As crazy as it seems after all the time we can now enable SDL without pulling
it into main (as we have done some splits of runtime modules and -gui
components in the past years).
I'll first try to implement it that way.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~paelzer/ubuntu/+source/qemu/+git/qemu/+merge/404247
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256185
Title:
[MIR] libsdl2
To manage no
FYI I added the package subscription while we intend to complete this to
not miss it later.
BTW it might be time for the dependency stats of the day on this topic
comparing v1 and v2:
Mid 2017:
dep-sdl1.2: 400
b-dep-sdl1.2: 327
Mid2020
dep-sdl2: 179
b-dep-sdl2: 154
dep-sdl1.2: 379
b-dep-sdl1.2:
Thanks for the review Alex!
SDL as qemu backend is in many cases inferior to GTK which we continue
to use and recommend as default. But at the same time there are over and
over some edge cases where SDL would be beneficial to users. For those
we wanted and will be able to enable it now - that will
Ping, I know the queue is full and resources scarce but we are really
waiting for this to have at least one release (21.10) out in the field
before hitting an LTS (22.04) with it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:/
Re-awakening this as qemu considers to provide SDL2 based backend (not sdl1) as
alternative to gtk.
So the qemu driven demand is coming back into play.
I also had a few community people ask for it.
libdsl1.2 is out of main since Bionic.
This would bring in libsdl2 into groovy (or later).
So the
[Expired for libsdl2 (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: libsdl2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125618
Marking the bug as Incomplete based on Alex' question. Unsubscribing
ubuntu-security since there is nothing to do at this team. If a team
steps up for non-security maintenance, please feel free to resubscribe
the security team.
** Changed in: libsdl2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** C
Since qemu is off the list it looks like the primary motivation for this
MIR is now gone - as such, the security team proposes we close this MIR
and then if another team still wants libsdl2 in main, they should file a
new MIR.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
besides the security review, it would would be good to know which
packages in main are migratable to libsdl2, and when libsdl1.2 can be
demoted.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256185
T
FYI on qemu, at least for that we don't need sdl2 anymore.
This went on and switched to gtk3 and libvte which both are in main already.
There still is plenty of reason for sdl2 still, but qemu is off that
list now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
It is next in the priority queue (if it doesn't get bumped), but hasn't
been started yet.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256185
Title:
[MIR] libsdl2
To manage notifications about th
Ping on this - how is this making progress or is it being lost?
If we'd get the MIR done to the end of 18.04 I would like to move qemu
to use it very early in 18.10.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
Qemu in Debian now switched over to SDL2, and while there are issues
this will be extra maintenance effort. Might even be the same for more
packages and we might get more component mismatches soon.
I outlined before that:
- the tests it has are not meant to run on build, see comment #11
- there sh
Oh I see sec team is already assigned, so that should be ok
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256185
Title:
[MIR] libsdl2
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.lau
Addtional feedback on the tests from IRC on #SDL
That confirms my analysis of being no common "make check" tests and that we
might be able to use a few for dep8, but nothing like a real test in the way
build time tests usually are used.
[09:49] Hi, I'm wondering about the tests in the test subd
On the motivation:
Initially this was described as
"So it's time to replace libsdl1.2 with libsdl2"
Given that there are 400 effective and 327 build depends this certainly will be
no "replacement".
Like Serge said in comment #4, some packages might benefit and do the switch -
but others might
libsdl2 is still in universe in yakkety; I suspect we cannot get to this
request in time for 16.10 release.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256185
Title:
[MIR] libsdl2
To man
This is fixed now?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256185
Title:
[MIR] libsdl2
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libsdl2/+bug/12
s/15.10/16.04
Ping? The new libsdl2 is now on xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256185
Title:
[MIR] libsdl2
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad
There's a typo in comment #5. I meant to type 15.10 instead of 16.10.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256185
Title:
[MIR] libsdl2
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:
What is the status of this MIR? Is it still needed?
Unfortunately, the security team lost track of this MIR so I'm trying to
understand if it is something we need to get to before 16.10. Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
@damage3025,
you changed the status from Incomplete but you did not answer mterry's
questions. Incomplete means that the bug is awaiting further info.
** Changed in: libsdl2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Note server team would be happy to see this too so that qemu could be
switched over from libsdl1.2.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256185
Title:
[MIR] libsdl2
To manage notification
** Changed in: libsdl2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1256185
Title:
[MIR] libsdl2
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bug
Good point! It would be nice to see us switch main over.
In terms of blockers, this needs a team bug subscriber. And it needs a
MIR for tslib too.
But besides that, it looks pretty good. sdl1.2 was already in main,
this has few bugs, is well maintained in Debian, we're in sync with
Debian. It
Oh, looking over my comment, I see that I didn't mention that it has
tests that aren't run. It seems like it has quite a few test files; is
there a reason they can't be run during build?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
37 matches
Mail list logo
