Pardon a stupid question, but what would it take to get emacs23 in main?
Installing the old version is likely to seem like overtly cautious in
the eyes of some users.
--
FFe for emacs23
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
era era+launchpad@iki.fi writes:
Pardon a stupid question, but what would it take to get emacs23 in main?
Installing the old version is likely to seem like overtly cautious in
the eyes of some users.
17:23 siretart` @ftpmasters: will emacs23 be semi-automatically
be
Ouch, that was a surprise.
I've been using Karmic with the emacs package and therefore emacs23
for a few weeks, without significant problems (just Emacs quirks which I
hope will be tidied up in time).
Today, update-manager tried to install emacs22, which I didn't want.
I appreciate that emacs23
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 06:02:08PM -, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Is it possible to have the emacs package depend on emacs22 OR emacs23,
and prefer emacs22 if neither is installed already, to avoid this?
No, that's contrary to the purpose of the 'emacs' package. If you want
emacs23 and not
This merge has stolen the 'emacs' binary package from emacs22, and now
emacs depends on emacs23 and is uninstallable in main. This needs to be
fixed.
** Changed in: emacs22 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Wishlist = High
** Changed in: emacs22 (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released = Triaged
--
FFe for
** Also affects: emacs22 (Ubuntu Karmic)
Importance: High
Status: Triaged
** Also affects: emacs23 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
FFe for emacs23
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
fixing emacs22 now. emacs23 also needs reuploaded to stop building
emacs.
** Changed in: emacs23 (Ubuntu Karmic)
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: emacs23 (Ubuntu Karmic)
Status: New = Triaged
** Changed in: emacs22 (Ubuntu Karmic)
Status: Triaged = In Progress
**
This bug was fixed in the package emacs22 - 22.2-0ubuntu5
---
emacs22 (22.2-0ubuntu5) karmic; urgency=low
* Claim back the 'emacs' binary package, which was incorrectly moved to
emacs23 in a post-beta merge. LP: #433397.
-- Steve Langasek steve.langa...@ubuntu.com Sun, 11
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/emacs22
--
FFe for emacs23
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
This bug was fixed in the package emacs23 - 23.1+1-4ubuntu2
---
emacs23 (23.1+1-4ubuntu2) karmic; urgency=low
* Stop shipping emacs binary so emacs22 in main doesn't get hijacked
(LP: #433397)
- Comment out the binary in debian/control
-- Scott Kitterman
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacs23
** Changed in: emacs22 (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
--
FFe for emacs23
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Thanks very much for this, folks.
--
FFe for emacs23
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
StefanPotyra stefan.pot...@informatik.uni-erlangen.de writes:
(subscribing siretart as another source for information).
Just to make it clear, I'm not opposing to get a newer emacs in in
general (even though I'm a vi user :P). What's the state of emacs-
snapshot right now? Is emacs23 newer?
Ack from me too. Approved.
** Changed in: emacs22 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Wishlist
** Changed in: emacs22 (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
FFe for emacs23
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Ok, thanks, fair enough, +1 from me to get emacs23 in.
Nonetheless, the last upload of emacs-snapshot to ubuntu proper was
during jaunty. I guess we should either update this from Romains
repository or remove it. Do you agree?
--
FFe for emacs23
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397
You
(subscribing siretart as another source for information).
Just to make it clear, I'm not opposing to get a newer emacs in in
general (even though I'm a vi user :P). What's the state of emacs-
snapshot right now? Is emacs23 newer? Should we drop emacs-snapshot (and
rdepends) in favour of emacs23
Hm... then we'd end up with a 3rd version of emacs in universe, as
there's also emacs-snaphost. Romain, what's your opinion?
--
FFe for emacs23
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Package changed: dpkg (Ubuntu) = emacs22 (Ubuntu)
--
FFe for emacs23
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/433397
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
18 matches
Mail list logo
