Hi, thanks your your sudden enthusiasm of my report. I wrote the script
somewhat 2 years ago now as a proof of concept, and I've never had the
need for spell checking feature in command-not-found. :~)
I will see what I can do to help, though I am a bit stretched for time
these days.
Regards.
I profiled your code (0.2.41ubuntu2) and on my computer the bottleneck is this
statement:
SourcesList()
The slow part of that is that it reads the info files in
/usr/share/python-apt/templates/
every time.
And the slow part of that is that it tries to translate the
descriptions.
--
You
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 3:03 AM, Zygmunt Krynicki
zygmunt.kryni...@canonical.com wrote:
While I appreciate your enthusiasm and desire to fix this I have a few
Actually, I don't have much of either. But thanks for your appreciation.
:)
1) Unless I missed something your implementation always
** Changed in: command-not-found (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598282
Title:
command-not-found slow for its task
To manage notifications
Feel free to help me out. The only issue why this app is slow is python
startup time. A rewrite in C would make it much more responsive. NB: The
app is _fast_ but not _responsive_.
More than a year ago I did an experiment with c-n-f running as a daemon
with a trimmed-down C program talking to it
I checked your script -- it does not seem to offer typo corrections -
could you please add that feature (or disable it in c-n-f) and re-
benchmark both?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
See attached. Try
tar xaf pkghint.tar.bz2
cd pkghint
./makedb.sh
make
Here are some times on my computer:
rg@rqgm:pkghint$ time /usr/lib/command-not-found foobar
foobar: command not found
real0m0.204s
user0m0.168s
sys 0m0.032s
rg@rqgm:pkghint$ time ./pkghint foobar
foobar:
Bugfix.
Also, two warnings:
- I didn't really think about what needs to go in the database. (In other
words, makedb.sh is a complete hack.)
- figuring out the active sources is also a hack, because I was lazy to fugure
out how to use libapt from C; it may be worth using it unless it
While I appreciate your enthusiasm and desire to fix this I have a few
comments:
1) Unless I missed something your implementation always reads the whole
database file, I would rather avoid that.
2) The similar result search you employed is much weaker than the one used by
current
** Attachment added: Dependencies.txt
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/50870215/Dependencies.txt
--
command-not-found slow for its task
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598282
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
10 matches
Mail list logo
