** No longer affects: audacious
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889585
Title:
Audacious is pretty outdated in Ubuntu repositories (new upstream
release: audacious 3.2)
To manage
audacious-plugins | 3.2-1 | precise/universe | source, amd64,
armel, i386, powerpc
** Changed in: audacious-plugins (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
The audacious 3.2.1 source used in Precise will compile with Precise's
version of libavcodec, you just need to alter the configure
configure.ac to reflect current version difference.
Tested works just fine here on 12.04, considering Precise is unlikely to use
a source newer than 3.2.1 should
** Changed in: audacious (Debian)
Status: New = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889585
Title:
Audacious is pretty outdated in Ubuntu repositories (new upstream
This bug was fixed in the package audacious - 3.2-1
---
audacious (3.2-1) unstable; urgency=low
* New upstream release. (Closes: #639374, #657081)
* debian/control:
+ Removed all references to libmowgli
+ Added libuchardet-dev and libguess-dev as build-dep
+ Raised
audacious-plugins also need updating
** Also affects: audacious-plugins (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889585
Title:
Audacious
... seems to be in unstable already: http://packages.qa.debian.org/a
/audacious-plugins/news/20120127T084721Z.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889585
Title:
Audacious is pretty
Is it reasonable to maintain 'audacious' and 'audacious-plugins' as two
separate source packages?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889585
Title:
Audacious is pretty outdated in Ubuntu
@Bob
Afaik. that's upstream decision.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889585
Title:
Audacious is pretty outdated in Ubuntu repositories (new upstream
release: audacious 3.2)
To
The attachment undo commit 166902832b0e94d090acaf1c31688e70668388ac of
this bug report has been identified as being a patch. The ubuntu-
reviewers team has been subscribed to the bug report so that they can
review the patch. In the event that this is in fact not a patch you can
resolve this
** Summary changed:
- Audacious is pretty outdated in Ubuntu repositories (new upstream release:
audacious 3.1.2)
+ Audacious is pretty outdated in Ubuntu repositories (new upstream release:
audacious 3.2)
** Description changed:
Audacious is pretty outdated in Ubuntu repositories (2.4.4-1
Audacious 3.2+ won't compile with the FFaudio input plugin enabled on
Ubuntu (Precise Pangolin included) because it needs FFmpeg 0.9+. This
happens since Audacious' ffaudio plugin is using avcodec_decode_audio4()
instead of avcodec_decode_audio3(), now deprecated.
A quick and dirty workaround
** Changed in: audacious (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided = Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889585
Title:
Audacious is pretty outdated in Ubuntu repositories (new upstream
jacopol,
different version numbers of FFmpeg and its fork named Libav (used in Ubuntu
starting from Natty) cause some confusion...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/889585
Title:
14 matches
Mail list logo
