I have finished the packaging for Debian (which is now awaiting
approval). I will have a Ubuntu package shortly I hope.
--
[needs-packaging] winff - GUI ffmpeg batch video converter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 172804 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172804
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 172804
[needs-packaging] winff - GUI ffmpeg batch video converter
--
Create Package: WinFF 0.41
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/197767
You received this bug
One month ago I asked if the bug reporter could check against solutions
in two other bug reports (#42274 and #206511). The reporter did not
comment back.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: New => Incomplete
--
Laptop (DELL); when closing lid screen stays on
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1234
A rational why this "won't be fixed" is in bug #6366.
--
no mp3 support, even with universe enabled
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110349
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
I am currently waiting for bug #260464 to be resolved. The rest is
finished. Debian package is already on the queue [1] for two months, but
was a long time during that period unable to build due to a bug in
Debian [2], I hope it will receive some attention soon.
At the moment the thing I can do is
And for the sake of completeness: I uploaded my package as it is now to
revu [1] as suggested on IRC #ubuntu-motu.
[1] http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/details.py?package=winff
--
[needs-packaging] winff - GUI ffmpeg batch video converter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172804
You received this bug no
Avidemux 2.4.3 is already present in Intrepid, so will be available in
the new release.
--
Please merge avidemux 2.4.3 from debian-multimedia.org
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255470
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Correct me if I am wrong, but at this moment I think this bug can be
closed because the package texinfo-doc-nonfree (in universe) supplies
the requested manual.
--
[needs-packaging] GNU Texinfo manual
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95662
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
lazarus 0.9.26-2 is in jaunty.
** Changed in: lazarus (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
Please sync lazarus 0.9.24-0-12 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/276151
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
ffmpeg changed the names of a lot of codecs internally around their
version 9500 or 10,000 (haven't found the exact revision yet).
Therefore, the problem which is mentioned in this bug is really that the
user uses the old codec name instead of the new one. I would say this is
a regression issue, bu
This bug report is being closed due to the last comments regarding this
being fixed with an update. For future reference you can manage the
status of your own bugs by clicking on the current status in the yellow
line and then choosing a new status in the revealed drop down box. You
can learn more a
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ffmpeg
Some packages would like to have the unstripped version installed if it is
available for the user. Would it not be an idea to create a virtual package
ffmpeg-unstripped which depends on the unstripped versions of the libs? I.e.:
libavcodec-unstr
I asked if you could please translate your problem into English. There
was no response, so I mark it as incomplete.
** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
Error fatal en el archivo grafico PNG:IDAT:CRC Error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/122692
You received this b
The sync is in progress [1], but is blocked by bug 275688.
[1] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/lazarus/0.9.26-1
--
Please sync lazarus 0.9.26-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297404
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I checked that this is indeed the case and filed a bug at the Debian bug
tracker.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #506065
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506065
** Also affects: debian via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506065
Importance: Unknown
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better.
I am trying to reproduce your bug, but I don't understand where you find
the Help menu (are you using Lazarus or some other GUI?). Could you give
me a more detailed description to trigger this bug? If you can not
r
Thank you for taking the time to make Ubuntu better. Unfortunately I am
not able to reproduce your bug. I am using version 2.2.0-dfsg1-9ubuntu1
(in Intrepid) and just get a "No debugger support available." when I
press F8. So most likely your bug is fixed in a later version.
--
fp-ide SIGSEGV
ht
Please disregard my previous comment, I figured out how to use fp
directly (hadn't done that before). However, I still not able to
reproduce your bug because I don't get the documentation to load into fp
(probably an other bug I guess)
** Changed in: fpc (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
Nice you picked this up so quickly ;)
Could you explain to me why this is changed like
-Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+XSBC-Original-Maintainer: Alexandre Pineau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+Maintainer: Ubuntu MOTU Developers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and not like
-Maintainer: Debian QA Gro
Even in Jaunty fpc is not synced to the current version in Debian. Does
anybody know why not? I thought that Jaunty would be synced with Debian
unstable, or is that not done with packages that have a Ubuntu packaged
version? If the latter is the case, could we just request a sync from
debian for th
> For an SRU it needs someone to investigate the status on each affected
> release and document what is needed for each and come up with a plan.
Can I find documentation somewhere what kind of information is needed,
and how to obtain it? I found [1] but there is no mention of
dependencies of the S
Thank you for taking the time to make Ubuntu better.
When I look at [1] I see that fpc-source (mind the name) is in the
recommends section of lazarus. As far as I can tell in (k|x|)ubuntu most
package manners pull in recommends automatically. What package manager
do you use, it looks like the beha
If I understand correctly you get the screen that I attach to this bug.
Right?
** Attachment added: "Screenshot with error message"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20114769/Lazarus_screenshot.png
--
Installation does not set Freepascal source directory
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303709
You
** Description changed:
+ The symptom is that Lazarus, when it starts up, displays a message box
+ saying
+
+ "The Free Pascal source directory was not found. Some code functions will not
work. It is recommended that you install it and set the path
+ Environment -> Environment Options -> Files
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #507523
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507523
** Also affects: lazarus (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=507523
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Installation does not set Freepascal source
Now in Ubuntu. See: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/winff
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
[needs-packaging] winff - GUI ffmpeg batch video converter
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/172804
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Public bug reported:
The presets.xml file that comes with winff is compatible with the
version of ffmpeg in debian. However the version in jaunty is a lot
newer. ffmpeg has seen some changes in the recent past, justifying an
updated presets file. Also because the libavcodec-unstripped-52 supports
** Attachment added: "debdiff against winff-0.43-2"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20129334/winff-0.43-2ubuntu1.debdiff
--
[jaunty] Presets are not compatible with the ffmpeg version
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304249
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
I set the bug to confirmed as I am pretty sure of this.
** Changed in: winff (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
[jaunty] Presets are not compatible with the ffmpeg version
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304249
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Tags added: patch update
--
[jaunty] Presets are not compatible with the ffmpeg version
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304249
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
In jaunty the sync is done, it is available for i386 and amd64.
** Changed in: lazarus (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
Please sync lazarus 0.9.26-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297404
You received this bug notification because you are a me
This bug is fixed in version 0.9.24-10, so that means that it is fixed
in jaunty. However, if you do an upgrade you won't see that it is
solved due to files in ~/.lazarus/ So it is fixed for fresh installs,
but not for updates (and never will because this is user space which is
respected).
Due to
I am looking into how to get sbuild to work... (of course it doesn't
want to do what I want straight away), but in the mean time I like to
note for this bug that with only the sync with debian bug #260464
appears to be back, as can be seen in the build log of lazarus [1]. When
I look at the upstrea
I have build fpc in jaunty with the attached changes. Lazarus build fine
in jaunty after that. I can also upload the .diff.gz, but that is quiet
crowded with touched Makefiles. Just tell me if they are needed.
** Attachment added: "Changes from 2.2.2-4 to 2.2.2-4ubuntu1"
http://launchpadlibrari
I reopen this bug because by syncing fpc in jaunty the bug is back (in
Jaunty). Although John Dong (the uploader of the patch in Intrepid)
mentioned it could be dropped on the next sync, the bug is , as far as I
can tell, only fixed in upstream version 2.3.1. I attached a patch to
the 2.2.2-4 packa
So far I have tested building 2.2.2-4ubuntu1 on gutsy, intrepid and hardy.
Gutsy fails because of
Processing fpcsrc/utils/Makefile.fpc
Error: Target "linux", package "fcl-base" not found
Googling for that error it looks like that is due to a different location of
the fpc source [0]
Hardy and
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #506977
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506977
** Also affects: fpc (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506977
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Please sync fpc 2.2.2-4 (universe) from Debian u
I changed the title and description of this bug to reflect where this
bug really is about at the moment. Please correct if it does not match
the facts, it is written as I understand the issue.
** Summary changed:
- Please sync fpc 2.2.2-4 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
+ License issue: pl
> With respect to the building problems, could it be that the build
system is poluted with an older install ? A FPC build should be always
the same, so the logical conclusion is that there is something different
on the buildmachines. (IOW a different version installed to bootstrap,
one a full versi
For completeness I also attached the patch here. Bug 275688 is getting a
little long and is basically unrelated.
** Attachment added: "Patch to debian directory of the 2.2.2-4 version of fpc
package"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19982413/debian.ubuntu.diff
--
fp-units-gtk2 has undefined re
The blocking problem is better tracked in bug 260464.
--
Please sync lazarus 0.9.26-1 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297404
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing l
First results (intrepid) for rebuilding packages with reverse build depend on
fpc:
gearhead builds normal in intrepid
hedgewars builds normal in intrepid
imapcopy builds normal in intrepid
libhdate builds normal in intrepid
m-tx builds normal in intrepid
lazarus fails to build in intrepid with:
g
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntu-restricted-extras
The libavcodec-unstripped-51 does not work with the latest version of
ffmpeg, because libavcodec-unstripped-52 is the latest version.
I expected by pulling ubuntu-restricted-extras in that ffmpeg would be
able to convert using th
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ffmpeg
Testing in jaunty I am not able to use the libx264 codec of ffmpeg (via
libavcodec-unstripped-52), which did work in intrepid.
# lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu jaunty (development branch)
Release:9.04
# apt-cache policy libavcodec
> i needed to install the following packages to compile nedit from source:
>
> libmotif-dev, libmotif3,libxp-dev
Those packages are from the multiverse repository, while nedit is in
universe. So this is not a general solution for nedit.
I confirm myself that the bug exist also in my new packages
** Changed in: nedit (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
in 9.04 for AMD64, nedit will not copy to clipboard
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366835
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
Just to be sure: you can or you can not?
Jonathan Thomas wrote:
> I can reproduce this with Konversation 1.1.75 in Kubuntu 9.04.
> (Backported packages from the development version Kubuntu 9.10)
>
> ** Changed in: konversation (Ubuntu)
>Status: New => Fix Released
>
--
Konversation cras
The PowerPC issue [1] seems to be fixed a long time ago in Debian. Could
one of the buildd-admins please bootstrap fpc on ppc?
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=362410
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #362410
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=362410
--
James (or any other possible sponsor),
Would you mind commenting on my last debdiff? If possible of course just
implementing ;)
Paul
--
[jaunty] Presets should be updated because the ffmpeg version in Ubuntu is
newer than in Debian
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304249
You received this bug n
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28169733/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28169734/ProcEnviron.txt
--
thunderbird does not use the init.d directory in .mozilla-thunderbird
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: thunderbird
Because my thunderbird did not display my date and time as I wanted, I created
a init.d/S00Locale file as described on
http://kb.mozillazine.org/Change_the_Date_Format
Unfortunately that only worked after I created a shortlink from ~/.thunde
I found a bug report in upstream openmotif with a bug that resembles
this bug very much. Most likely the problem in the motif library. Patch
available there.
** Package changed: nedit (Ubuntu) => openmotif (Ubuntu)
** Bug watch added: bugs.motifzone.net/ #1257
http://bugs.motifzone.net/show_bu
Bugreport upstream: http://bugs.motifzone.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1257
** Summary changed:
- Open File dialog fails with inexplicable "Please select a file to open" error
+ openmotif: XmTextField Character 'xxx' not supported in font.
--
openmotif: XmTextField Character 'xxx' not supported in fon
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #533420
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=533420
** Also affects: lazarus (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=533420
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
lazarus-src package short description is lin
I made a mistake in my previous comment (#9), nedit in Ubuntu is in
multiverse, not in universe. In 1:5.5-2ubuntu1 until (not including)
1:5.5-3 nedit depended on motif. Pending a fix in lesstif we might want
to build nedit using motif again in Ubuntu.
As a side note, when we keep nedit building o
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, I am closing it because the bug has been fixed
in the latest development version of Ubuntu - Karmic Koala.
This is a significant bug in Ubuntu. If you need a fix for the bug in
previous versions of Ubuntu,
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, I am closing it because the bug has been fixed
in the latest development version of Ubuntu - Karmic Koala.
If you need a fix for the bug in previous versions of Ubuntu, please
follow the instructions for "
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. However, I am closing it because the bug has been fixed
in the latest development version of Ubuntu - Karmic Koala.
If you need a fix for the bug in previous versions of Ubuntu, please
follow the instructions for "
I just found out that this bug *might* be introduced because a patch was
reverted for an other problem. I just marked a bug in lesstif2 for
Debian to track it. I will be looking into this.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #217121
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=217121
**
> The more I look at this, the more I think there is a problem with the
> function pa_context_new().
>
> How do we move this one forward?
I guess if it really should be fixed upstream look at their bugtracker
(see first if it is already fixed) and file a bug there [1]. If you find
there that the
> If you want something tested let me know. I have used nedit for
> years, and will miss it.
Just so you know, I have nedit (and lesstif2, you probably want that
too) in my PPA [1]. I would appreciate it when you test it end tell me
if it solves your problem (and what how your experience with my p
The gtk1.2 seem to have been removed from Karmic. So this bug needs
fixing before the release.
I asked the Debian maintainer if I could help but he said (in the Debian
bug report) that he would soon upload a newer version (0.9.26.2) which
fixes this bug.
--
Needs compiling with GTK2 not GTK1
htt
The gtk1.2 seem to have been removed from Karmic. So this bug needs
fixing before the release.
I asked the Debian maintainer if I could help but he said (in the Debian
bug report) that he would soon upload a newer version (0.9.26.2) which
fixes this bug.
** Changed in: lazarus (Ubuntu)
Sta
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26274805/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26274806/ProcEnviron.txt
--
firefox: crashes on viideo stream with pulse.c:200: pulse_new: Assertion
`p->context' failed.
h
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox-3.0
When I try to view the first video at http://www.bergredding.nl/?p=826
my firefox crashes. This is very reproducible. I have three extensions
installed (Novell Moonlight 1.0, Unofficial Google Translate Firefox
extension 1.3, and Web Developer
Please install libavcodec-unstripped-51 from the multiverse repository
(probably already available) and report back if you still have this
issue.
** Changed in: ffmpeg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
ffmpeg no mpeg-ts, xvid, ogg, mp3lame, ... support
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Just want to let you know, I made improvements to lesstif2 (which is now
in Debian; sync request for Ubuntu in bug 369383). I hope that I will
come up with an improved version of nedit tonight or somewhere this
weekend. I will include them in my PPA [1]. When testing is successful,
you could figure
For Jaunty and Intrepid lesstif2 and nedit are in new versions in my
PPA, please test. I would be very good if this problem goes away by it.
Reading through the document in my last comment I don't think the
package qualifies for a SRU, but instead we might try a backport [1].
Please let me know if
lesstif2 version 1:0.95.0-2.3 has entered karmic (Ubuntu 9.10) and fixed
this bug.
Please reopen this bug if you think it is not solved properly.
** Changed in: lesstif2 (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
Missing include in Xpmcreate.c and Xpmscan.c
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
lesstif2 version 1:0.95.0-2.3 has entered karmic (Ubuntu 9.10) and fixed
this bug.
Please reopen this bug if you think is it not fixed properly.
** Changed in: lesstif2 (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
xmgrace with LessTif crashes when Esc key is pressed on menu
https://bu
lesstif2 version 1:0.95.0-2.3 was fixed with respect to a major 64bit
issue. Could you please check/confirm that the bug still exists with
lesstif2 version 1:0.95.0-2.3?
--
Anomalous visual program editor of openDX in 64bit ubuntu/kubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110404
You received this b
As far as I can see at the moment terminator does not use the proper
syntax for it to declare to be an alternative for x-terminal-emulator
[1]
Programs that depend on the -e option appear to be broken when
terminator is the program linked in /etc/alternatives/x-terminal-
emulator.
Please don't sp
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #343868
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=343868
** Also affects: nedit (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=343868
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
in 9.04 for AMD64, nedit will not copy to clip
Are you sure this is new for you?
In Debian there are several bugs related to copy/pasting in the lesstif2
library. You might want to see if you can pin your problem down.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?pkg=lesstif2;dist=unstable
I am planning on working on lesstif2 and nedit afte
>From the terminator man page:
-x, --execute=COMMAND [ARGS]
Runs the rest of the command line instead of your default shell
or profile specified command.
This is the option that has the desired effect, as far as I understand it,
according to the policy.
Policy
Suppo
> The policy would suggest that GNOME Terminal is not suitable either,
> since its -x is xterm's -e, and it doesn't support -T.
I think this is correct. I will look at the gnome terminal and file a
bug there when appropriate.
> I suppose that means that on the face of it, we should not install
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-terminal
Gnome-terminal does not honor the -e option in the same way as xterm
does. It claims it is an alternative for x-terminal-emulator so
according to the policy [1] it must honor the -e option in the same way
as it does now with the -x option.
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26027685/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26027686/ProcEnviron.txt
--
gnome-terminal does not honor x-terminal-emulator -e option
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3679
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: kdebase
When I try to copy a file with a "?" or a ":" (and probably others) in the file
name dolphin complains that:
"""
Could not write to /path/to/file.
"""
Although I understand that such filename are slightly difficult, they
are valid names and I li
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26030276/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26030278/ProcEnviron.txt
--
dolphin does not allow files with names with ? or : to be copied
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 275688 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/275688
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 275688, so it is being marked as such. Please look at
The bug has been fixed in Debian. You can watch bug 369383 for the
progress on sync to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: lesstif2 (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => In Progress
** Changed in: lesstif2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Fabián Rodríguez (magicfab) => (unassigned)
--
xmgrace with LessTif crashes wh
** Summary changed:
- lesstif2: improving the package by including Fedora and upstream patches
+ Please sync lesstif2 0.95.0-2.3 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
** Description changed:
+ Binary package hint: lesstif2
+
+ The lesstif2 package has been updated in Debian to version 0.95.0-2
The bug has been fixed in Debian. You can follow the progress of the
sync of lesstif2 to Ubuntu in bug 369383.
** Changed in: lesstif2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
--
Missing include in Xpmcreate.c and Xpmscan.c
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/340633
You received this bug notificat
** Package changed: ubuntu => computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
--
computer-janitor recommends remove frostwire
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366453
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists
I believe the user is using nautilus, so therefor I relocate the package
there.
** Package changed: ubuntu => nautilus (Ubuntu)
--
when I try to delete anything the trash goes to .local/share/Trash/files. The
only way I can get rid of them is to use the terminal.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This bug did not have a package associated with it, which
is important for ensuring that it gets looked at by the proper
developers. You can learn more about finding the right package at
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. Unfortunately, we can't fix it because your description
didn't include enough information. You may find it helpful to read "How
to report bugs effectively"
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/bugs.html. We'd
** Attachment added: "Debdiff from Ubuntu 0.45.1-2ubuntu1 to Ubuntu
1.0.1-2ubuntu1"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26095405/winff_0.45.1-1ubuntu1_to_1.0.1-2ubuntu1.debdiff
** Changed in: winff (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Please merge winff1.0.1-2 (universe) from Debian unsta
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: winff
I preprared a merge for WinFF from Debian. The version in Debian
includes a new upstream version where some reorganization has been done
and removal of documentation with unclear licenses. I like to keep the
changes that we included in bug 304249. T
** Attachment added: "Debdiff for Debian to Ubuntu"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26095284/winff_1.0.1-2_to_1.0.1-2ubuntu1.debdiff
--
Please merge winff1.0.1-2 (universe) from Debian unstable (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368898
You received this bug notification because you are a m
Nathan Handler wrote:
> I modified the changelog entry slightly to cause this bug report to be
> automatically closed before I uploaded it. Thanks for your contribution.
Thanks. When I was in bed I thought that I should have done the same,
including the mentioning of the ..remaining changes...
Pa
If I interpret the last comment correctly, this bug belongs to update-
manager.
** Package changed: ubuntu => update-manager (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
/var/cache/apt/archives/lock has a problem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366566
You
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu
better. Could you please add the log files from '/var/log/dist-upgrade/'
to this bug report as separate attachments? Thanks in advance.
** Tags added: intrepid2jaunty
--
/var/cache/apt/archives/lock has a problem
https://bu
** Attachment added: "debdiff from 0.95.0-2.1ubuntu1 to 0.95.0-2.1ubuntu2"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/26146457/0.95.0-2.1ubuntu1_0.95.0-2.1ubuntu2.debdiff
** Tags added: debdiff
** Changed in: lesstif2 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
lesstif2: improving the package by includ
ebian/copyright with version numbers of the (L)GPL (lintian)
* Added description to old patch files (lintian)
-- Paul Gevers Wed, 29 Apr 2009 17:52:21 +0200
--
lesstif2: improving the package by including Fedora and upstream patches
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/369383
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: lesstif2
Recently I have invested quite some time to prepare a debdif for
lesstif2 [0] to help the maintainer in Debian. Lesstif, which had low
threshold NMU preference set, did not have a regular update in 1.5 years
and definitely could use some attentio
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #522157
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=522157
** Also affects: lesstif2 (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=522157
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
lesstif2: improving the package by includin
Thank you for taking the time to make Ubuntu better. Your bugreport
relies heavily on French, while this community is English. If the
problem still exists for you could you run the program with the language
set to C?
E.g.:
p...@etna ~ $ LC_ALL=C sudo synaptic
or whatever package manager you are u
Thank you for taking the time to make Ubuntu better. Understanding the
workaround, this problem is not in lazarus, but with gtk1.2, which is
removed from Karmic anyway, so in the development release of Ubuntu this
bug is fixed/invalid. The upcoming version of lazarus is build using
gtk2.0, so this
1 - 100 of 1229 matches
Mail list logo
