I have AR9285 and also experience this bug. I lose connections with
remote systems and have low speed. Kernel .35 was fine.
There is no working workaround for my issue.
** Summary changed:
- slow wifi (atheros driver issue)
+ slow wifi (atheros [ath9k] driver issue)
--
You received this bug
@Goalie: Ekhm, this bug is about 3945, not 5300.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
@Castelli: Surely it will. Moreover, .38 provides workaround for my bug
(effective disabling of hardware scanning).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless
Public bug reported:
When using Check disc for defects option in Xubuntu's menu I always get:
keys:Press any key to reboot your system when the check is done. It surely
doesn't inform me whether it was fine or not.
I'm using a USB stick.
This is the latest Xubuntu - 11.04. - Natty.
** Affects:
It is still present, in the stable release of Xubuntu.
** Changed in: casper (Ubuntu)
Status: New = Confirmed
** Description changed:
- Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel
+ On Xubuntu Natty the 'Check Disk for Defects' option either does not
+ work, or doesn't tell you whether
It's absolutely the latest as the sha256 sum matches.
With the standard Ubuntu it prints the No errors found or similar but with
Xubuntu it prints keys:Press any key to reboot your system instead (note the
keys: too).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
And sorry about that change, I thought it would be ignored as the right
package is already there.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752994
Title:
Natty Xubuntu: Check Disc for Defects
Another kernel for all of you to test:
http://piliszek.tk/patch%231/linux-image-2.6.35-25-generic_2.6.35-25.44_i386.deb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless
And another one:
http://piliszek.tk/patch%232/linux-image-2.6.35-25-generic_2.6.35-25.44_i386.deb
Note that they replace each other. I had not found any info about how to
change the version before I started compiling them.
But I can assure you that the next time I will upload a patched kernel,
That's interesting.
The 2nd undoubtedly has the PLCP patch. The 1st one has slightly modified PLCP
patch which still helps SilvioTO.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
To sum up, there are at least three *different* bugs resulting in similar
behavior:
- PLCP-related (#236, #237, #250 fix it)
- hwscan-related (#250 fixes it - this is in my case)
- still unknown because for some neither of above applies
I'm still waiting for reports on #250.
--
You received
@Andy Whitcroft:
Right, splitting it is a must.
I restudied all the posts and came to conclusion that the PLCP check patch
helps with devices of at least these three subsystems:
[8086:1011]
[8086:1020]
[8086:1041]
And the hwscan patch (in other words: disable_hw_scan=1 as default and 2.6.38's
@krader: If I'm correct, you may benefit from #250. Use the normal
kernel and carefully follow instructions in that archive.
@Andy: Do we have to auto-close it? Would be wise to see which
subsystems get fixed by this patch (give it a week more to live).
--
You received this bug notification
When posting results of #270:
- state if it fixes your problem
- post the output of lspci -vnn | grep -A 1 Wireless (even if you did before)
Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
krader and picomike have the same revision as I do but this fix helps
them. Therefore subsystem may be of no importance.
However, William Scheidegger shares my experience and this fix doesn't
help him.
@William Scheidegger: Could you please try:
sudo rmmod iwl3945 iwlcore
sudo modprobe iwl3945
About #283:
Don't try this with #270, it is meant to work with #250. My bad. Sorry.
It fixes my issue, so it's worth a try.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow
@kdekda: #250 is the one which includes the fix I needed (new swscan algo and
hwscan disabled by default).
As previous kernel didn't help you, it seems you experience the same problem I
did.
Undoubtedly, at least 2 different bugs right here with optional third but let's
still wait for the
Yup, you have to remove compat-wireless.
Anyway, the rmmod and modprobe works fine only with 2.6.38's wireless stack.
Moreover, it's not needed with #250, because it will default to swscan.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
If you installed #270 and now apply #250, it will work fine.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
@Brian: What about #236?
@Patrick: Does #236 or #237 help you?
@aus: disable_hw_scan=0 is the default.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless Connection in
Please, all of you, try this:
http://people.redhat.com/sgruszka/compat-wireless-2011-02-10-iwlwifi.tar.bz2
Instructions are inside in README.
If you have any questions, don't bother to ask.
Please make sure you didn't follow #245 as it conflicts with this test case. If
you did, please revert
Not in my case. I tried with two different routers.
@kdekda: Try #250 please.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
--
ubuntu-bugs
Quoting that page: with no bandwidth performance difference.
I doubt it could help us.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
--
@Patrick: If you're sure you did it properly, it may mean you experience
some kind of third version of this bug...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless
@data, @s0undt3ch: Please try #250, great instructions are in #298.
@William Scheidegger: I think credits for #250 should go to Stanislaw
Gruszka from Redhat.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
This is already a helpful info.
#237 should, hopefully, perform even better.
Awaiting results.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
@enedene: You must have the same problem I do! Try #250. It helps me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
As they were obsoleted, I deleted #236's and #237's patched kernels from
my site.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
--
No results?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Because speed's decrease is not immediate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
@Eric Appleman:
Only the first two commits affect the driver, the rest applies to iwlagn only.
I will try to find out which commit makes it this slow.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I reverted: a6866ac93e6cb68091326e80b4fa4619a5957644
and recompiled kernel but with no luck (problem persists) so it seems to be the
2nd one.
I am checking it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
It seems it's a fault of my router-notebook pair.
Even Windows has low transfers :(
I guess I'm just unlucky.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless Connection in
Ah, I was too fast to say that. In Linux speeds go down to around 0 so
yes there is a problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
I started by fixing Windows. Seems it was using a buggy driver. Now it has
proper speeds (around 3MBytes/s).
So there is now a base for comparison.
I will test reverting the 1st and then 2nd commit again, taking into
account that speed decrease isn't always instant - I just experienced
it.
Ok, now I'm 100% sure a6866ac93e6cb68091326e80b4fa4619a5957644 isn't what we
are looking for.
Going for the 2nd.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless
I tried reverting the 2nd one. No results.
As these are only commits affecting iwl3945 I think we are stuck.
Are you sure you have found the right regression window?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.35.y.git;a=commit;h=a6866ac93e6cb68091326e80b4fa4619a5957644
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.35.y.git;a=commit;h=1402364162afbaac1b8a74ee21aeb013e817ac7d
I strongly doubt it could be
I've tested Linux 2.6.36.2 and it works fine (constant 20Mbit/s).
However I used Gentoo. I'll try with 2.6.35.
(maybe it's something just Ubuntu-related)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Thanks for info about 2.6.36.2 on Mint.
2.6.35.10 works perfectly fine on Gentoo.
I think the problem is somewhere else. I mean it can be actually a problem with
kernel but only when used with some software etc.
In Gentoo I use wpa_supplicant and dhcpcd. IIRC Ubuntu uses NetworkManager.
Ok,
I doubt. It must be something more internal. New service management stuff
wouldn't cause problems like this one.
Especially as it seems the problem is related to iwl3945 only. However, are we
sure it applies only to iwl3945?
I have also a question (as I'm now running Gentoo and want to play
Another idea came to my mind: maybe it's Ubuntu's wpa_supplicant that is
buggy and doesn't work with latest kernel patches?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless
@Eric: 2.6.34.7 isn't older than 2.6.35-rc1 and actually there don't
seem to be any more important code changes in iwl3945 driver. I haven't
tested unencrypted connections because I can't allow them in my
environment.
@Daniel: Thanks.
@Jonathan: Yes, they actually suggested it for a guy that has
0.6.10 works fine in Gentoo.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
You did it with NetworkManager, don't you?
It might use wpa_supplicant for unencrypted as well.
You could try disabling NetworkManager at all and using iwconfig+dhcpcd
(or dhclient).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Do you mean that you don't know how or that it doesn't work?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Adding bugwatches:
http://bugzilla.intellinuxwireless.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1932
http://bugzilla.intellinuxwireless.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1592
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16132
** Bug watch added: bugzilla.intellinuxwireless.org/ #1932
I used Mint10 LiveDVD.
After killing dbus (to kill all NM stuff) [X got killed as well of course] I
went to the console and manually set up a connection with wpa_supplicant and
dhclient.
I used wget for download and got speed 16-20Mbit/s during download of 800MByte
file.
Could anyone confirm
I've already excluded wpa_supplicant. (my tests on Gentoo + Jonathan's report)
I included it because it handles wireless connections for NetworkManager.
Currently I'm focusing on NetworkManager.
Can you think of other differences between Ubuntu/Fedora and Gentoo that
could matter?
--
You
Ctrl+Alt+F1
sudo -i
pkill dbus
wpa_passphrase ESSID myconf
(now write the passphrase) RETURN
wpa_supplicant -iwlan0 -cmyconf -Dwext -B
dhclient wlan0
wget .
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Could everyone post the output of lspci -vnn | grep -A 1 Wireless?
Please also state if you experience the problem or not.
Thank you.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Please, everyone capable to do so, try
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654599#c23
and tell if it fixes problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow
@Raju: That is normal. When there is no data sent it usually shows the minimum
(1Mb/s).
This bug is about speed drop that happens after some time of download and which
only reboot can recover from.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
@fliebel, Nick B.: It does not help here either.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I will post tomorrow a linux-image with plcp patch applied so that you
all could test it and report.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel
@fliebel: Please post output of: lspci -vnn | grep -A 1 Wireless
I always use WPA2-AES. It seems to give you a little fix but not for the others.
@all of you:
This bug seems to be very nasty: I can kill it by connecting with
NetworkManager, disabling NM and connecting using command line tools
The patch copied from Redhat's bugzilla.
** Patch added: The patch copied from Redhat's bugzilla.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/621265/+attachment/1803132/+files/0002-iwl3945-remove-check_plcp_health.patch
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
A link to compiled i386 Ubuntu kernel with plcp patch.
http://piliszek.tk/linux-image-2.6.35-24-generic_2.6.35-24.42_i386.deb
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow
But the extremely low speeds are gone, aren't they?
To be honest, this fix does NOT help me at all. It has only helped
SilvioTO.
Please report.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
I hope someone would explain why it does not work for me. :-(
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
@Nicholas: I've just tested 10.04.1 (before reading your post; I'm now testing
all distros I have burnt CDs of)
and it's buggy as well.
You seem to experience similar bug to mine as PLCP patch doesn't help
you.
wpa_supplicant helps me as described above: I can kill it [the bug] by
connecting
Till now I've tested 5 OSes:
4 are buggy:
Fedora 13/14
Ubuntu 10.04/10.10
The 5th is not because it does not use NetworkManager (it is Mandriva 2010.1).
Also Gentoo (which I use w/o NM as well) is free of this bug.
This makes me sure it is NetworkManager that causes all this hell for
me.
Also affected:
Ubuntu 9.04/9.10
openSuSE 11.3
and probably others using NetworkManager.
That's odd - I've used Ubuntu (so NM as well) with Atheros-based chips and
everything was fine.
How could NM depend on underlying hardware that much?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
@nicholas: I did. I downloaded twice a 700MB iso.
@Eric:
wpa_passphrase SSID myconf
wpa_supplicant -Dwext -iwlan0 -cmyconf -B
dhclient wlan0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Ah, forgot to say that wpa_passphrase wants your passphrase to be
written to stdin.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
--
Why doesn't it help me but Mandriva?
Kubuntu has NetworkManager enabled by default.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
--
@kdekda: Could you post the output of lspci -vnn | grep -A 1 Wireless
and try Mandriva Linux?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/621265
Title:
Slow Wireless Connection in Intel 3945abg
@Jg-staffel:
If you are not familiar with kernel compiling, you should try the compiled
kernel (if you have i386) from #209.
If you want to try (or if you use x86_64), follow these instructions:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/BuildYourOwnKernel
and BEFORE you start compilation, put the patch file
I've been inactive for a long time but here I come again and see people still
having the same problem.
I was one of the first (if not the first) to discover that Network Manager was
causing or at least augmenting the problem. It's a pity neither Network
Manager's nor Intel's team did anything
This bug is gone with Xubuntu 12.04 and 13.04.
** Changed in: xubuntu-artwork (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/752994
Title:
Xubuntu:
FYI, downstream bug in kolla:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla/+bug/1848295
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848139
Title:
trove post-install fails
To manage notifications about this
Hey James, what about bionic repos?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1848139
Title:
trove post-install fails
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Public bug reported:
Trying to install rally (bionic, train):
rally : Depends: python-rally (= 0.9.1-0ubuntu2) but it is not going to
be installed
downstream kolla bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kolla/+bug/1848295
** Affects: cloud-archive
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
**
Hi Hans,
()[root@7bd43ba9e153 /]# apt policy rally
rally:
Installed: (none)
Candidate: 0.9.1-0ubuntu2
Version table:
0.9.1-0ubuntu2 500
500 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic/universe amd64 Packages
()[root@7bd43ba9e153 /]# apt policy python-rally
python-rally:
This has been reported to Kolla via IRC.
** Also affects: openvswitch
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: neutron
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: kolla-ansible
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug
Kolla is officially supporting Focal since Victoria but it should not be
too hard for users to switch the base image for Ussuri too.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890922
Title:
** Changed in: masakari/victoria
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: masakari/ussuri
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: masakari/train
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in: masakari/stein
Importance: Undecided => Medium
** Changed in:
** Changed in: masakari-monitors (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Changed in: masakari (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Also affects: masakari/stein
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: masakari/victoria
Importance: High
Assignee: Radosław Piliszek (yoctozepto)
Status: Fix Released
** Also affects: masakari/ussuri
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also
Groovy should really just use the newly-released RC1 of Victoria.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773765
Title:
There is a possibility that 'running' notification will remain
To
** Changed in: masakari
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773765
Title:
There is a possibility that 'running' notification will remain
To
** Also affects: masakari/stein
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: masakari/victoria
Importance: Undecided
Assignee: suzhengwei (sue.sam)
Status: Fix Released
** Also affects: masakari/train
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects:
If you need to use this right away, I recommend you switch to our source
images as we control them entirely.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1890922
Title:
ed25519 keys unsupported
Indeed, Ubuntu Bionic does not seem to meet the requirements:
https://opendev.org/openstack/requirements/src/commit/7ea3fea5458a8e3ef4e03ba15ea64b2ff16dfcf1
/upper-constraints.txt#L184
However, this is not a Kolla issue as binary builds simply ensure
compatibility with distributions and this
** Changed in: masakari/ussuri
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Changed in: masakari/train
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Changed in: masakari/stein
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: masakari/stein
Status: Triaged => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1839715
Title:
masakari fails if hypervisor name does not match nova service name
To
FWIW, there is now the "in_ccm" attribute on both kinds of nodes which
would help. I have to revisit this in the Xena cycle.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728527
Title:
hostmonitor
** Changed in: masakari/victoria
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Changed in: masakari/ussuri
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
** Changed in: masakari/train
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
This is fixed in a later Train release. The current is 9.1.1.
Ubuntu has to build the package.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773765
Title:
There is a possibility that 'running'
Ussuri* release. Sorry for the confusion.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1773765
Title:
There is a possibility that 'running' notification will remain
To manage notifications about
** No longer affects: masakari
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1804062
Title:
test_hacking fails for python 3.6.7 and newer
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
Hey Canonical OpenStack team, assigning this bug to you as well to let
you know there will be a relatively important patch to be applied. I
will be making some relevant releases soon.
** Also affects: masakari-monitors (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in:
BTW, RCA in comment #5
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1930361
Title:
hostmonitor hangs after notifications send failed
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
93 matches
Mail list logo
