Re: [Bug 125887] Re: (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning

2008-09-04 Thread André Pirard
On 2008-08-12 12:07, Sebastien Bacher wrote : the issue seems to be trigger only on some special setups and it should be sent to the people who write the software on bugzilla.gnome.org, nobody having the issue seems to be interested in doing that though that's why the bug has been closed

Re: [Bug 125887] Re: (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning

2008-08-12 Thread André Pirard
On 11/08/2008 11:52, Sebastien Bacher wrote: Nobody sent the request upstream, closing the bug for now, feel free to reopen if you still have some interest in the change and wants to open the bug on bugzilla.gnome.org too ** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid

[Bug 125887] Re: (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning

2008-08-12 Thread Sebastien Bacher
the issue seems to be trigger only on some special setups and it should be sent to the people who write the software on bugzilla.gnome.org, nobody having the issue seems to be interested in doing that though that's why the bug has been closed -- (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another

[Bug 125887] Re: (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning

2008-08-11 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Nobody sent the request upstream, closing the bug for now, feel free to reopen if you still have some interest in the change and wants to open the bug on bugzilla.gnome.org too ** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another

[Bug 125887] Re: (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning

2008-07-17 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
leaving this as incomplete until someone send it upstream. ** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125887 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 125887] Re: (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning

2008-06-16 Thread Sebastien Bacher
could anybody having the issue sent that to bugzilla.gnome.org directly? you are better placed to reply to their comments than somebody who doesn't get the issue -- (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125887 You received this bug

[Bug 125887] Re: (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning

2008-03-13 Thread André Pirard
** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = Confirmed -- (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125887 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 125887] Re: (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning

2008-03-12 Thread André Pirard
I confirm Rebecca's report. As I'm deep testing 8.04a4-6, I gedit files on an external fat32 USB drive and it happens exactly as she says : occasionally, saving, or rather wanting to save, a long time edit file (typically dormant behind a background tab) will produce that message. But the file

[Bug 125887] Re: (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning

2008-03-12 Thread André Pirard
I can say that the situation is sticky. That is, once gedit alledges that the file was externally modified, it will continue to do so if one selects Don't save and tries to save again (and again). This said, I investigated a case and I attached a log showing : - the time and time stamps of the

[Bug 125887] Re: (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning

2008-01-07 Thread Mikael Grön
I have the same problem. Running Ubuntu 7.10, gedit 2.20.3. I use cifs mounts to all our business network resources and the problem occurs on all files I've tried throughout the LAN. Every time I've saved a file gedit (within a few seconds) warns that the file's been changed since the last edit

[Bug 125887] Re: (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning

2007-11-26 Thread Sebastien Bacher
could you describe steps to trigger the issue? ** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125887 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 125887] Re: (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning

2007-11-22 Thread Ariel P
This question describes a very similar problem: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gedit/+question/18405 Instead of fat32, the problem is with samba. ** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu) Status: Invalid = New -- (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning

[Bug 125887] Re: (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning

2007-08-06 Thread Sebastien Bacher
** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete = New -- (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125887 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 125887] Re: (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning

2007-08-06 Thread Rebecca Palmer
I haven't seen this again since reporting it, after seeing it several times shortly before. The all 0s access time now appears to be normal-everything on FAT32 that hasn't been accessed during that session has it. -- (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning

[Bug 125887] Re: (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning

2007-08-06 Thread Sebastien Bacher
closing then, feel free to reopen if you get the issue again and figure a way to trigger it ** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu) Status: New = Invalid -- (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/125887 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 125887] Re: (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning

2007-07-23 Thread Sebastien Bacher
Thank you for your bug. Does it happen only on fat32? Do you have a way to trigger the bug? Are you sure than no other program is touching the file? Might be something similar to http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=409374 ** Changed in: gedit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided = Low

[Bug 125887] Re: (fat32) Unexpected file modified by another process warning

2007-07-23 Thread Rebecca Palmer
Nothing else was running that should have been writing to the files, though I don't have any actual file stats from the bug. I've only seen it on FAT32, but since I don't have a way to reproduce the bug, this may simply reflect the files I edit most being stored there. At least some occurrences