[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2012-12-24 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: evolution Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13983 Title: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server To manage

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2012-11-29 Thread Grzegorz G.
This problem has returned in Ubuntu 12.10 - Evolution's account options were simplified and there is no place to set default junk or trash folder (only drafts and sent). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2011-11-23 Thread Jochen Fahrner
Boleslaw, you misunderstand. A protocol has nothing to do with a user interface. These are two distinct things. Look at the POP-protocol: it has no folders, it has no trash and it is not designed to leave mail on the server. But many mail clients have local folders, local trash, and leave mail

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2011-11-23 Thread Bolesław Tokarski
Again, as you noted - there are clients doing that, so this is not a technical limitation of the IMAP protocol. I admit I have not studied the RFC for IMAP, perhaps it says that the only accepted way to delete mail is to mark them as deleted instead of moving it to the Trash folder. Be it this

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2011-11-22 Thread Bolesław Tokarski
Oh, jofa, man you are so in the dark. Old fashioned technical arguments is what your Linux is built upon. On open standards, which are being adhered to. If you want to have user experience to have higher priority than old fashioned technical arguments, go to Microsoft. They broke a great deal of

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2011-11-15 Thread Jean-Christophe Baptiste
Simply, it has always been a show-stopper for me. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13983 Title: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server To manage notifications

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2011-11-15 Thread Jochen Fahrner
Don't mind about it. Evolution is history. Canonical has decided to make Thunderbird the default mail client, and they did it right. The evolution of evolution got stuck in the last century. If someone is argueing this is the way how imap is designed to work, he is not willing to make his piece of

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2011-05-16 Thread Leeq
Like Jochen said, this feature is still not supported. I tried with both IMAP and IMAP+ on Evolution 2.32.2. The mail server is Exchange 2010. In help manual, it says When you press Delete or click the Trash folder, your mail is not actually deleted, but is marked for deletion. Your email is

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2011-05-05 Thread Jochen Fahrner
I now have upgraded to Natty, but I cannot find these settings for Allow normal, non-vFolder, Trash and Junk folder. Where are these new settings? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13983

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2011-01-03 Thread areteichi
I pulled the package from Natty repository. Not an ideal solution but it seems to be working fine so far. I needed to update libgtkhtml-editor0 in addition. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2010-12-21 Thread Jochen Fahrner
Is it possible to install evolution (2.32.0-0ubuntu1) on Maverick? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13983 Title: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server -- ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2010-11-23 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package evolution - 2.32.0-0ubuntu1 --- evolution (2.32.0-0ubuntu1) natty; urgency=low * Upstream release 2.32.0 - Empty reply quotation for HTML messages (LP: #630566, #659513) - Encrypt to self by default on newly created mail (LP: #326979) -

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2010-11-23 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/evolution-data-server ** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/evolution -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13983 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. --

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2010-09-16 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: evolution Importance: Unknown = Low -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13983 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2010-08-23 Thread Nigel Babu
Since this patch has essentially been forwarded from the upstream bug tracker, I'm marking this bug as patch-forwarded-upstream. ** Tags added: patch-forwarded-upstream ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Assignee: Ubuntu Desktop Bugs (desktop-bugs) = (unassigned) -- Evolution virtual trash

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2010-07-13 Thread john sullivan
Why do people use DELETE as a means to archive emails? Because all I need to do is click the DELETE button, or press the DELETE key, to delete the message. I would be happy to archive my email differently, if it were even mildly convenient. In Evolution, to archive an email, I need to: 1.

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2010-07-13 Thread Octavio Alvarez
[off-topic, since it this is more of a support response] John Sullivan and others: When I used Evolution, I used search folders. I had a special search folder for the unread e-mails. When the e-mail was irrelevant, I just marked it as read using the keyboard shortcut. I think it was Ctrl+J. As

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2010-05-25 Thread ignasi
I totally agree. I will never be able to use or recommend Evolution until this issue is solved. -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13983 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2010-05-05 Thread showgun
I have to agree it is all about freedom... Ain't this what we are all about freedom -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13983 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. --

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2010-04-19 Thread Jan
OMG, this bug is about nine years old, and nothing happend yet - evolution is still messing up with IMAP and my googlemail-account. I would _really do_ prefer, if evolution would leave me a choice how to handle junk and trash (vfolder vs. mapping the real folder). Thanks in advance --

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2010-03-25 Thread T. Scott Barnes
Just wanted to add, I appreciate Evolution doing things the right way, but not having the option to have deleting move the message to the server's Trash folder (and allowing defining what folder to use as the trash) breaks Gmail's IMAP, since on Gmail IMAP marking a message as deleted then

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2010-03-17 Thread Petr Leiman
I do not see what is the problem with having Evo direct deleted messages into an IMAP folder. Please, can anyone explain how this is different from the action of moving the messages from one folder into another??? One can move messages into the IMAP Deleted Items (or whatever the name of it)

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2010-02-17 Thread Wadelius
I agree as well. When I set up systems for others I am forced to install thunderbird because of this issue. Is there no way to have a poll about this? -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13983 You received this bug notification because you are

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2010-02-16 Thread mikef
I accept that Evolution is implementing IMAP as intended, however the YOUR DOING IT WRONG argument is a silly one. Usability is about producing a system which works in a human natural way, not necessarily the most sensible. Users of IMAP want to be able to view and manage their emails in a

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2010-02-16 Thread bananenkasper
There is nothing left to say! Totally agree! -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13983 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2009-12-21 Thread Alexander Pas
From #25 Just lost over 800 deleted emails. My response: so what? didn't you just deleted them? If you didn't want to lose them, you shouldn't have deleted them in the first place. If you wanted to keep them, just not in your inbox, you should've stored them in an folder. TRASH IS NOT AN

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2009-12-18 Thread Trois Singes
What could we do in order to vote for this feature ? I know a lot of users (including myself) preferring Thunderbird over Evo on Ubuntu because of the lack of this feature, and despite the better integration of Evo. What a pity ! -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2009-12-10 Thread clain
@Carl: Sorry you didn't understand how Evo works... the Evo-Trash-Folder ist not local on your client, it is virtual and contains all messages marked with the DELETED-flag. So the message stays in INBOX.friends, but is marked as deleted. When Evo lists all the messages of INBOX.friends, it only

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2009-12-01 Thread Carl Friis-Hansen
It is possible that I have misunderstood how Evu works, but one thing is for certain, you misunderstood the main point and I will tell this from a more practical point of view, something reproductive. If anyone wants to try it out, I will gladly open an email account just for the research, if we

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2009-12-01 Thread Carl Friis-Hansen
A note about the directory structure. As you can see on the picture, the INBOX.Trash is not iconized as trash, but is actually showing the contents of the trash folder on the server. The Trash folder on the other hand, is icinized as trash, but is outside the structure of the INBOX and is not

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2009-11-25 Thread Guillaume Lanquepin
This bug is not a discussion about the best way to implement IMAP. It exists two concurrents way of doing, one adds flag and virtual trash, another one move emails to a trash folder. Of course, I well see the point of Evo devs: it is faster to marks email as deleted than move them. But that is

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2009-11-24 Thread Carl Friis-Hansen
For Delete message Evolution is using: IMAPv4 EXPUNGE Command instead of \Deleted flag set For search message Evolution is using: fetch all mail, inclusive body where apply, and do a local search (The POP3 way) instead of IMAPv4 SEARCH Command Here is a fresh example why it is a

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2009-11-24 Thread Sebastien Bacher
not sure what the recent comment is about, evolution does flag delete emails which is what users complain about on this bug since there are some to want delete to erase emails rather than flag those -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13983 You

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2009-11-24 Thread Paul Smith
Sebastien is correct that Carl's message is missing information. Evo most definitely DOES mark messages as deleted and does NOT expunge them (unless you use the Expunge action of course; the keybinding for this is CTRL-E so it's possible Carl hit it by accident). The entire concept of storing

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2009-11-19 Thread Guillaume Lanquepin
As we have a patch, it would be great to have package then. Like Felipe, I have no skills in packaging but I'm really willing to do my best as tester. Please, can somebody package it in his PPA ? -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13983 You

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2009-10-31 Thread Busby
Frederik Elwert wrote on 2008-06-19: Evolution is actually correct here: http://deflexion.com/2006/05/imap-way-of-deleting-message No, evolution is not correct. The correct behavior would be to not allow messages to be moved, since IMAP does not support moving messages. If the Evolution devs

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2009-08-26 Thread Felipe Figueiredo
The upstream bug has a patch that has been considered to work. Can this be targeted for Karmic? If so, can I as a tester help in any way? I have little to none packaging skills, but I'm willing to spend a few hours if it will mean that this patch will make it into Karmic (assuming it's not

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2009-08-26 Thread Felipe Figueiredo
** Attachment added: upstream patch - eds part http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30885841/gn206061_eds.patch -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13983 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2009-08-26 Thread Felipe Figueiredo
** Attachment added: upstream patch - evo part http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30885863/gn206061_evo.patch -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13983 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2009-07-13 Thread Andrea Garbarini
same problem here, i was about to open a new bug report but i seem to understand this a problem with evolution (at first i thought it was a problem with the imap server)... I agree, this is irritating, I am attaching a screenshot: compare with kmail's behaviour and the web client: deleted an email

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2009-05-07 Thread Wadelius
I agree with Guillaume, I'm also a bit disappointed. On my phone I can easily select the folder that it should threat as trash, but when I first could not find this feature in Evolution I was very confused. This should be available. Other than this minor anoyance, I think Evolution is the best

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2009-04-21 Thread Guillaume Lanquepin
I still have this problem with Jaunty... Although the bug was posted in 2005 !!! Who I must kill to have an fucking checkbox with Use server Trash and Junk folders ? Since 2005, nobody finds a fix for this behaviour -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2009-04-21 Thread Sir Thorn
The comment above you mentions a fix (via plugin) in the upstream report. Before you go cussing out the developers here, you could at least try it and say if it works or not. -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13983 You received this bug

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2009-04-21 Thread Pedro Villavicencio
To maintain a respectful atmosphere, please follow the code of conduct - http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct/ . Bug reports are handled by humans, the majority of whom are volunteers, so please bear this in mind. -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2009-04-21 Thread Guillaume Lanquepin
Sorry, I didn't find that plugin...The tarball contains Makefile.am and sources but no configure neither makefile . And, thus I didn't success to compile it. Maybe you are able to fix that, not me... I'm sorry to be aggressive but when I see the evolution FAQ (http://www .go-

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2008-12-14 Thread Václav Šmilauer
Upstream bugreport has eplugin for disabling virtual folders on imap accounts. (It someone has a few hours to integrate that into evolution source and upload to his/her ppa, it would be much appreciated...; I cannot do it ATM unfortunately) -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2008-10-24 Thread Marcel
Confirmed on Ubuntu 8.10 alpha6 64-bit Evolution 2.24.1 I have 1 Evolution Trash and one IMAP Trash. I don't have the correct icons for my IMAP folders also. I rather would have the Thunderbird/Lightning combination syncing with gnome-pilot, since Mozilla does more active development IMO. --

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2008-06-19 Thread Frederik Elwert
Evolution is actually correct here: http://deflexion.com/2006/05/imap- way-of-deleting-message But if the users whish for a non-standard way, it might be nice to have a non-default option to move deleted mails. But be aware that you aks the developers to implement something wrong. -- Evolution

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2008-02-29 Thread Kasimir Gabert
I agree that this is very annoying. However, it is possible to do this currently. Just go into your folder, and then press Ctrl+E. It should permanently delete all messages that are marked as 'deleted'. -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2007-12-30 Thread Michael Pangopoulos
This 'fix' sounds like a workaround. Why would I want messages marked for deletion laying around in the inbox in the first place? If this behaviour is opt-in in other clients, Evolution should at least make this behaviour opt-out. -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2007-12-29 Thread Matthew Gregg
Wouldn't the fix for this problem, be to expunge your messages? Why do you keep so many delete messages around? Evolution is correct with the way it handles deleted mail(marked as delete not moved to trash). Other clients can be configured to work in this way and is the way the IMAP standard

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2007-12-20 Thread Michael Pangopoulos
IMO this behaviour defeats the purpose of IMAP. The main reason for using IMAP, at least in my case, is to have my mail in sync, wherever I am. With Evolution I have to download heaps of deleted messages to my cell phone just because Evolution can't get it right. If they can't understand that

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2007-11-22 Thread Graeme Humphries
So that's basically a good luck, nobody's ever going to fix this horribly broken behaviour then, since Paul already pointed out upstream seems to have no intention of fixing it? -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13983 You received this bug

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2007-10-22 Thread Sebastien Bacher
There is ten of thousand of bugs opened and this one is not a priority I doubt that somebody from the Ubuntu team will work on this any time soon, upstream would be a better place to ask for comments ** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed = Triaged -- Evolution virtual trash

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2007-10-21 Thread Paul Kishimoto
I'm sorry to post here instead of upstream, but there have been ~17 duplicates over 6 years and no developer action, leading me to believe that upstream is *not* the place to get this fixed. Is there anything to be done to motivate an actual fix? Someone (within Ubuntu, maybe) to beg, or a bounty

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2007-10-05 Thread Jonathan Ernst
Same bug, but for the Spam folder : Bug #135485 -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13983 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2007-02-09 Thread Daniel Holbach
** Changed in: evolution (Ubuntu) Assignee: Sebastien Bacher = Ubuntu Desktop Bugs -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server https://launchpad.net/bugs/13983 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 13983] Re: Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server

2006-06-15 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: evolution (upstream) Status: Unconfirmed = Confirmed -- Evolution virtual trash / real trash on IMAP server https://launchpad.net/bugs/13983 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs