[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-27 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package systemd - 229-4ubuntu21 --- systemd (229-4ubuntu21) xenial; urgency=medium * networkd: do not uncoditionally apply NOARP. * networkd: fix size of MTUBytes so that it does not overwrites ARP. * Fixes regression-updates LP: #1727301 -- Dimitri

[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-27 Thread Markus Schade
the updates-proposed build works in my case as well -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727301 Title: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces To manage

[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-27 Thread Robie Basak
** Tags removed: regression-updates ** Tags added: regression-update -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727301 Title: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
$ dpkg -l | grep 229-4 ii libpam-systemd:amd64229-4ubuntu21 amd64system and service manager - PAM module ii libsystemd-dev:amd64229-4ubuntu21

[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-27 Thread Andy Whitcroft
Hello Markus, or anyone else affected, Accepted systemd into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/229-4ubuntu21 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See

[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Description changed: [Impact] - * Setting [Link] MTUBytes= in .network file has a side-effect of +  * Setting [Link] MTUBytes= in .network file has a side-effect of overflowing and setting NOARP flag. This is not intended behaviour / regression. - * Trying to fix above by setting

[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Description changed: [Impact] - * Incomplete cherrypick of ARP functionality in networkd resulted in an - undesired side-effect, specifically NOARP flag started to be applied - unconditionally, specifically when it should not have, resulting in loss - of network connectivity. + *

[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-27 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Zesty) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Artful) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-27 Thread Markus Schade
The ppa package works for my use case. Maybe add this test-case to QA. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727301 Title: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Zesty) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Fix Released => Confirmed ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Zesty) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu Artful) Status: Fix

[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
aha, i need to specify anything that requires to call the code path to adjust any flags from non default. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727301 Title: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option

[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
I have packages built with above patch applied, which I suspect is the missing portion to fix this. It is available from this ppa https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/3015 $ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ci-train-ppa-service/3015 $ sudo apt-get update I am failing to

[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-26 Thread Bug Watch Updater
** Changed in: systemd Status: Unknown => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727301 Title: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces To

[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
** Description changed: + [Impact] + + * Incomplete cherrypick of ARP functionality in networkd resulted in an + undesired side-effect, specifically NOARP flag started to be applied + unconditionally, specifically when it should not have, resulting in loss + of network connectivity. + + * This

[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-26 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
I am suspecting the following cherrypick is missing in xenial: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/1ed1f50f8277df07918e13cba3331a114eaa6fe3.patch will prepare a PPA with this fix applied, and will expedite an sru with this fix in. ** Bug watch added: github.com/systemd/systemd/issues

[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-26 Thread Dennis Kuhn
I could solve this issue by rebuilding the debian packages without two patches: - networkd-add-support-to-configure-NOARP-ARP-for-interface.patch - networkd-bond-support-primary-slave-and-active-slave-4873.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-26 Thread Dennis Kuhn
We have the same problem without bond configured. After upgrading to systemd 229-4ubuntu20 NOARP is set to our network interfaces. The machine has two network interfaces and the configuration is very simple: # 50-ens5f0.network [Match] MACAddress=24:8a:7:11:50:a8 [Link] MTUBytes=9000 [Network]

[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-26 Thread Tobias Wolf
We are also affected by this suddenly after systemd upgrade the network was gone, had to go in via serial console. We are only using networkd because Martin Pitt said in the run-up to the 16.04 release that networkd would be supported and to be used in the next LTS release. # networkctl IDX

[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-26 Thread Markus Schade
the networking is configured via systemd-networkd. bonding module is loaded with 'max_bonds=0' to address upcoming systemd change https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/6184 pre-upgrade: # networkctl IDX LINK TYPE OPERATIONAL SETUP 1 lo loopback

[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-25 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users. ** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727301 Title:

[Bug 1727301] Re: 229-4ubuntu20 added ARP option breaks existing bonding interfaces

2017-10-25 Thread Dimitri John Ledkov
How are eth0/eth1/bond0 configured? Do you use netplan and networkd? Do you use ifupdown? Can you paste the output of $ networkctl? Copies of the configuration e.g.: /etc/network/interfaces /etc/network/interfaces.d/* /etc/netplan/* /run/systemd/network/* /etc/systemd/network/* -- You