[Bug 1864791] Re: Lubuntu failed install "wipefs --all /dev/sda9"

2021-04-05 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for calamares (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: calamares (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 1864791] Re: Lubuntu failed install "wipefs --all /dev/sda9"

2021-02-03 Thread Chris Guiver
Lubuntu 20.04.2 QA-test using RC Just experienced this again.. almost the same circumstances as prior occurrence (after bug http://launchpad.net/bugs/1914521) but a "Install Alongside" issue.. Difference to me is it occurred on a different (but similar) box - dell [optiplex] 755 (c2d-e8300,

[Bug 1864791] Re: Lubuntu failed install "wipefs --all /dev/sda9"

2021-01-11 Thread Walter Lapchynski
I'm going to assume this is no longer relevant but please let me know if not. ** Changed in: calamares (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864791

[Bug 1864791] Re: Lubuntu failed install "wipefs --all /dev/sda9"

2020-04-17 Thread Chris Guiver
Another re-try on d755-5 dell [optiplex] 755 (c2d-e6850, 5gb, amd/ati radeon rv516/x1300/x1550) NOT A CHECKLIST INSTALL; replace what was sda9 as /, re-use sda8 as home using ppa:lubuntu-dev/util-linux-patch; update & full-upgrade first (tsimonq2 requested re-test with updated packages..)

[Bug 1864791] Re: Lubuntu failed install "wipefs --all /dev/sda9"

2020-04-17 Thread Chris Guiver
hp 8200 elite sff (i5-2400, 8gb, nvidia quadro 600) manual partitioning & setup for my own use (KDE partition manager pre-running calamares) died with "The installer failed to delete partition /dev/sda. Delete partition '/dev/sda1/ (51.77Gib, unknown) Command: wipefs --all /dev/sda1" I played a

[Bug 1864791] Re: Lubuntu failed install "wipefs --all /dev/sda9"

2020-03-02 Thread Chris Guiver
Segfault mentioned in #11 is filed as https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1865817 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864791 Title: Lubuntu failed install "wipefs --all /dev/sda9" To manage

[Bug 1864791] Re: Lubuntu failed install "wipefs --all /dev/sda9"

2020-03-02 Thread Chris Guiver
I re-did that the second install mentioned in #10 with `sudo -E calamares -d` I won't copy/paste all messages - but NOTE the SegFault !?? 15:41:48 [6]: virtual void Calamares::JobThread::run() Skipping non-emergency job "umount" 15:41:48 [1]: ERROR: Installation failed: 15:41:48 [6]:

[Bug 1864791] Re: Lubuntu failed install "wipefs --all /dev/sda9"

2020-03-02 Thread Chris Guiver
Re-run on same d755-5 box (only box to have this issue so far) Attempt to re-install Lubuntu 20.04 daily over prior Lubuntu 20.04 image. sda8 is /home for prior install; is being re-used with NO-FORMAT. sda9 was / and it'll be re-formatted. I firstly ran QA-test install and got error 1864787.

[Bug 1864791] Re: Lubuntu failed install "wipefs --all /dev/sda9"

2020-02-29 Thread Chris Guiver
Identical machine, but the message text is different. This bug occurs on the next install after 1864787 bug has occurred. This bug possibly is a result of the 'mess' created by the prior (1864787) install crash I personally believe it's a duplicate (alas not 100% thus why I've not already

[Bug 1864791] Re: Lubuntu failed install "wipefs --all /dev/sda9"

2020-02-29 Thread Walter Lapchynski
Briefly, how does this bug differ from the other one? Is it a different machine? Different existing partition scheme? Different reproduction steps? Or just a different error? Also a fresh error log would be helpful. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1864791] Re: Lubuntu failed install "wipefs --all /dev/sda9"

2020-02-28 Thread Chris Guiver
repeated test mentioned in #6 again - / (sda9) partition (unknown now) will be formatted ext4 - re-use of sda8 for /home (no-format) Lubuntu 20.04 daily failed with The installer failed to delete partition /dev/sda Command: wipefs --all /dev/sda9 Failed to erase filesystem signature on

[Bug 1864791] Re: Lubuntu failed install "wipefs --all /dev/sda9"

2020-02-28 Thread Chris Guiver
repeat of last test (#5).. - / (sda9) partition has lubu system (format), - re-use sda8 for /home (no-format) I was unable to 'select' format for sda9 partition, so I changed format to 'reiser' then accepted; then returned it to ext4 & format was selected.. I had the

[Bug 1864791] Re: Lubuntu failed install "wipefs --all /dev/sda9"

2020-02-28 Thread Chris Guiver
I booted the Lubuntu 18.04.4 ISO on live, and couldn't see any issues. I used `gparted` to firstly delete the sda9 partition, clicked apply. Next I created a new ext4 partition using the space without issue & rebooted Re-ran Lubuntu 20.04 using new daily and Manual partitioning again - sda9

[Bug 1864791] Re: Lubuntu failed install "wipefs --all /dev/sda9"

2020-02-28 Thread Chris Guiver
Another qa-test and I had repeat of 1864787 thus on completion I exited & tried to use KDE Partition Manager to do what I expected `calamares` to do and got Could not delete file system on ‘/dev/sda9’. Delete file system on ‘/dev/sda9’: Error Delete partition ‘/dev/sda9’ (22.00 GiB, unknown):

[Bug 1864791] Re: Lubuntu failed install "wipefs --all /dev/sda9"

2020-02-25 Thread Chris Guiver
This bug is LIKELY related to http://launchpad.net/bugs/1864787 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1864791 Title: Lubuntu failed install "wipefs --all /dev/sda9" To manage notifications

[Bug 1864791] Re: Lubuntu failed install "wipefs --all /dev/sda9"

2020-02-25 Thread Ubuntu QA Website
This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker. A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/1864791 ** Tags added: iso-testing -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is