Yeah, it's fine, those are really small details that just raises a small
eyebrow but do nothing else :)
You are right, the process is completed. The package also already built, and
will be available in the archive in a matter of minutes/hours when the
publisher runs :)
--
You received this
@Mattia:
Thanks for review and uploading.
I guess the review boils down to that while the delta against Jammy is
reasonable small it could and should have been smaller. I can nothing
but agree. Of course, there are some explanations. Doubt they are
interesting, though.
If I get this right this
Looking at the diff, I also find it odd that you are changing d/watch
(according to the changelog, to please lintian?). That's totally
useless and just noisy (nobody is going to run uscan on this...), so I
recommend you don't do that at the next backport update.
Likewise I'm not sure why you
> Looking at that queue is somewhat scary, I see an entry from
2021-10-28
that's for the proposed pocked (i.e. SRUs), for backports yours is the
only package in the queue...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
@teward, @gunnarhj: Ah, right, this is similar to the Debian process.
Looking at that queue is somewhat scary, I see an entry from 2021-10-28.
Can just hope this goes faster.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Sponsoring alone doesnt approve it for Backports, the Backports team has
to review and approve. I'll take a look later, in the middle of my FT
job right now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
It's in the focal unapproved queue:
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/focal/+queue?queue_state=1
That's as far as I can do as a sponsor. Next it will be reviewed by
somebody in the backporters team.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
@gunnarhj:
Now, it was some days since you sponsored me, thanks for that. However,
I still don't see it in focal-backports, at least not when browsing. Is
this normal i. e., how long am I supposed to wait before package
becomes visible?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
> Is that mentioned at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports ?
u.U - somehow, despite the plenty of reviews we made to the drafts of
that page we still managed to miss it.
thank you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
On 2022-01-19 13:36, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> please remember to subscribe ~ubuntu-backporters for BPO bugs...
Is that mentioned at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackports ? (I don't
see it.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
@Mattia: OK, will do. Still learning.
Seems that having a discussion on ubuntu-devel is fruitful in many ways,
though ;)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956004
Title:
[BPO] Backport
please remember to subscribe ~ubuntu-backporters for BPO bugs...
As a backports team member learning about this bug from a ubuntu-devel-
discuss mail felt odd :3
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Deleted: Swedish talk
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956004
Title:
[BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.0 from Jammy
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
@gunnar: I found the bogus debian/ files. It's in the upstream sources,
used for PPA builds. The strange thing is that "gbp buildpackage" works
without problems which has made the package sail through all Debian
checks.
Anyway, the package is repackaged, so it's just to add debian to the
On 2022-01-18 22:53, Alec Leamas wrote:
>> One oddity is that the orig.tar.xz file includes a debian/ folder
>
> WTF?! Something is rotten in pristine-tar, will check again. Thanks
> for notifying.
Note that I didn't grab orig.tar.xz from the repo, but simply downloaded
it from the Ubuntu
@Gunnar: Man tackar (a. k. a. thanks for sponsoring)!
> Please unsubscribe ~ubuntu-sponsors from this bug.
Done
> One oddity is that the orig.tar.xz file includes a debian/ folder
WTF?! Something is rotten in pristine-tar, will check again. Thanks for
notifying.
--
You received this bug
I sponsored this to focal-backports.
One oddity is that the orig.tar.xz file includes a debian/ folder
including a debian/compat file. I had to remove the d/compat file to be
able to run debuild() successfully.
@Alec: Please unsubscribe ~ubuntu-sponsors from this bug.
--
You received this bug
@dan: I can understand if this thing take too much time for you. I'm
just a newbie which runs into obstacles others doesn't know about --
that's what newbies do.
Also, this discussion does not really belong to the issue. Should we
start a thread on ubuntu-devel instead, to get more eyes on it?
Turns out that this application process is a interesting chicken and egg
problem ;)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956004
Title:
[BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.0 from Jammy
To manage
Havn't tried that one, doing it now... result: "You are not allowed to
edit this page."
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956004
Title:
[BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.0 from Jammy
To
> However, to be able to do it I need to be member of the Ubuntu Wiki
Editors Team. My application for that is pending:
https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-wiki-editors.
hmm, that doesn't sound right to me, I'm not a member of that team but I
can create/edit wiki.ubuntu.com pages...granted that might
> Since you have a LP account, I'm pretty sure you should be able to
create a wiki page for yourself.
Nope.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956004
Title:
[BPO] Backport opencpn
I guessed something like that. However, to be able to do it I need to be
member of the Ubuntu Wiki Editors Team. My application for that is
pending: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-wiki-editors.
I have so far tried to learn the virtue of patience in the Debian
community. I have my background in
Hmm yes you're right that the wiki pages are a bit confusing, they
probably could do with a bit of updates to clarify things.
In any case for you, this is the section for *all* applications:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/ApplicationProcess#Applying_for_team_membership
so you
I'll try to make an application. F
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956004
Title:
[BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.0 from Jammy
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
...irst step is to become member of the wiki group. Waiting for that,,,
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956004
Title:
[BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.0 from Jammy
To manage notifications
Sllly me read on the wrong place. Sigh. And thanks.
But the devil is in the details. That paragraph links to the process
described in
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/ApplicationProcess. But
there is no description for this case. Any idea how this application
should be done?
--
> "The DMB has establised a procedure for interested Debian Developers
to gain upload rights to their packages"
that's just the process for existing DD who also already have PPU rights
to have their list of PPU packages extended.
You can apply for PPU completely separately from being DD.
hm... when I read
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DeveloperMembershipBoard/ApplicationProcess, the
"Debian Developers applying for Per-Package upload rights" paragraph,
the first sentence is
"The DMB has establised a procedure for interested Debian Developers to
gain upload rights to their packages"
As
> PPU rights... I first need to become a DD. I have so far said no to
this, but is about to reconsider.
No that's not true, being a DD helps but isn't required. You can have
PPU rights in Ubuntu without any upload rights for Debian.
If you mean you would *prefer* to become DD first, then yeah
@Dan: thanks for input, just what I needed.
PPU rights... I first need to become a DD. I have so far said no to
this, but is about to reconsider.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956004
> Is there a formal process for getting in touch with a sponsor, like
the mentors site and RFS bugs in Debian? Or should I drop a mail in the
ubuntu-backports mailnig list? Or?
you've subscribed the ubuntu-sponsors team, so that's probably the best bet for
passively finding a sponsor; there is a
@Dan: Thanks for review!
> While Debian uses 'Closes:', Ubuntu uses 'LP:', so this should be
Done
> technically, debhelper 13 is in focal-backports (and even bionic-
backports), but if you don't actually need level 13 it's fine to reduce
it in the backport.
Actually, it turns out the I did
** Changed in: opencpn (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Changed in: opencpn (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided => Low
** Tags added: upgrade-software-version
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Very minor comments on changelog:
+ * Closes: #1956004
While Debian uses 'Closes:', Ubuntu uses 'LP:', so this should be
* LP: #1956004
+ * d/control: debhelper compat 13 -> 12.
technically, debhelper 13 is in focal-backports (and even bionic-
backports), but if you don't actually need
FWIW, the corresponding Debian backport to bullseye-backports is
accepted.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956004
Title:
[BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.0 from Jammy
To manage
** Summary changed:
- [BPO] Backport 5.6.0 from Jammy
+ [BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.0 from Jammy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1956004
Title:
[BPO] Backport opencpn 5.6.0 from Jammy
37 matches
Mail list logo
