*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870835 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870835
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870835
flashplugin-installer still installs i386 plugin version, though native 64
bit plugin avaiable
--
You received this bug notification because you are
The adobe-flashplugin package from partner repository contains a proper
64-bit Flash plugin so you can install that one instead of flashplugin-
installer.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
But if you install ubuntu-restricted-extras it installs flashplugin-
installer which installed a bunch of i386 dependencies that I had to
clean out.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Absolutely right Corey, you got the point which seems missing in the official
view.
To add the partner repository and look for adobe-flashplugin IS NOT AN
USER-FRIENDLY SOLUTION!
We cannot even advice user to install the extras packages because it will
install flash-plugin 32 bits!
Again, if
What the flashplugin-installer package currently does is that in
postinst script, it downloads
http://archive.canonical.com/pool/partner/a/adobe-flashplugin/adobe-
flashplugin_11.0.1.152.orig.tar.gz, and install the 32-bit flash plugin
from it. However, the package contains both amd64 version and
http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/64-bit-Adobe-Flash-Player-added-
to-Ubuntu-repositories-1358899.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
Title:
Please package flashplugin
11.0.1.152 has landed.
https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/adobe-flashplugin
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
Title:
Please package flashplugin 64bit
To manage
Now need to fix restricted-addons packages:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-restricted-
addons/+bug/869559
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
Title:
Please
Micah, will Flash 11 64 bit be made available in Lucid, or will it be
staying on Flash 10?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
Title:
Please package flashplugin 64bit
To manage
Oh I'm sorry already mentioned in this thread
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
Title:
Please package flashplugin 64bit
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
In the meantime you might wanna try this:
https://launchpad.net/~sevenmachines/+archive/flash
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
Title:
Please package flashplugin 64bit
To manage
Flash Player 11 was released last night, finally with official 64-bit
Linux support.
http://get.adobe.com/flashplayer/otherversions/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
Title:
It will be supported in Oneiric:
https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/flashplugin-
installer/+question/173230
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
Title:
Please package
That post is not from an Ubuntu developer. It will happen when it
happens.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
Title:
Please package flashplugin 64bit
To manage notifications
I'm sorry, I should be a little more clear. This is being worked on and
will land as soon as sanely possible. I will make sure this bug is
closed when this is actually fixed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Chris, we should inform the users and they should decide. I've added the
information you provide to the FAQ. I'll see if we add the link again
from the release notes and how.
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification because you
Jeremy, those are very verbose and have some mistakes. Tx. for bringing
them to my attention - I was focusing on this specific problem, not on
Flash in general.
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification because you are a member
I want to warn that the 64-bit version of Flash player has a problem
with the return from full screen mode in some flash-based video players
when ATI driver is installed.
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification because you are
I've written a FAQ about installing the 64bit Flash plugin manually (tested in
Maverick):
https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+faq/1320
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I've removed the reference to the FAQ from the release notes. The
current 64-bit plugin has no commitment from Adobe to fix security
issues and the plugin has already been pulled once, leaving 64-bit users
exposed to pretty bad security vulnerabilities.
64-bit users can already install the 32-bit
Fabián, I like the 64-bit Flash installation instructions at
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RestrictedFormats/Flash . By using the
ppa, updates are nearly automatic.
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification because you are a
I am reopening this bug report. We won't include the 64bit flashplugin
in our archive until there is an official (non-beta) release from Adobe.
For the beta release of the flashplugin someone can provide a PPA.
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid = Triaged
--
It seems Adobe has finally issues another 64-bit preview. It seems to be
working fine for me so far, so will discussion open again?
http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification
Adobe has discontinued the 64 bit flash plugin trial. I'm closing this
bug until they actually release a 64 bit version and there's something
for us to do.
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed = Invalid
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
This is moot, since Adobe has pulled the plug on 64-bit Flash for Linux:
http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10_64bit.html
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) = Michael Asbury asbury (asbury-com)
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
@Michael Asbury asbury
Please don't assign yourself bugs that you are not working on fixing.
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Michael Asbury asbury (asbury-com) = (unassigned)
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this
I don't think the alpha version of flash is ready yet to be included for
basically the same reason that the ndiswapper solution should not be
included - they both have problems.
The alpha version seems ok on the surface, but it has one mayor flaw -
embedded links simply do not fire when clicked,
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 19:27, Terry Herckenrath
te...@cactuscoder.comwrote:
I don't think the alpha version of flash is ready yet to be included for
basically the same reason that the ndiswapper solution should not be
included - they both have problems.
The alpha version seems ok on the
@Danny Piccirillo
Linux is currently the only platform Adobe is supporting 64-bit on.
And Linux users care about that because of only one reason - that 64-bit
distributions forces all standard applications in repositories to be 64-bit. I
personally think it would be better if even 64-bit
@all
This is not a forum, this is a packaging request. Please go to
http://ubuntuforums.org/ to discuss your opinions on Linux, Ubuntu, and
Flash. When it's ready, we'll package it.
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification
I've edited the wiki page on Flash to emphasize the merits of using the
64-bit flash plugin.
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RestrictedFormats/Flash
Inasmuch as we can't package 64-bit flash for political reasons, I think
it would be great if we followed Michał Gołębiowski's suggestion in
This is not for political reasons. Also, I don't know if the Community
Docs should reflect something that's unsupported.
On 04/01/2010 09:11 AM, Benjamin Kay wrote:
I've edited the wiki page on Flash to emphasize the merits of using the
64-bit flash plugin.
The security and/or alpha status decision are political reasons. A
pragmatist would say that the x86_64 actually provides a better user
experience and makes Ubuntu look better and could be pulled (if
necessary) if there is a major security problem.
Simply put, the nspluginwrapper solution does
On 04/01/2010 10:00 AM, Mike Arthur wrote:
The security and/or alpha status decision are political reasons. A
pragmatist would say that the x86_64 actually provides a better user
experience and makes Ubuntu look better and could be pulled (if
necessary) if there is a major security problem.
I totally agree with Mike since unlike Micah I had serious stability
issues with nspluginwrapper in karmic.
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
boxee 64bit package depends on flashplugin-nonfree and this is why I
notice about the problem.
Why not make another package for alpha 64bit?
Also adobe package will stay in alpha for a looong time just because they not
provide full support
on this unused package (one of major distro, ubuntu, do
The main reason is no guaranteed security support from Adobe on the
alpha, if I remember correctly.
Here's a comment about the 64 bit release from Adobe:
http://kb2.adobe.com/cps/000/6b3af6c9.html
On 01/13/2010 03:29 AM, Daniele Smartango wrote:
boxee 64bit package depends on
there is a ppa now:
https://launchpad.net/~sevenmachines/+archive/flash
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 16:12 +, Micah Gersten wrote:
The main reason is no guaranteed security support from Adobe on the
alpha, if I remember correctly.
Here's a comment about the 64 bit release from Adobe:
LAZA wrote:
For me I got a problem since I installed Karmic new:
1. Installation
2.'Software Center' -- extras for Ubuntu (mp3, avi, mpge, TrueType, Java,
Flash; Codecs)
Cause of non-functional videos on some sites (???) i deinstalled
flashplugin-nonfree und manuelly installed the
For me I got a problem since I installed Karmic new:
1. Installation
2.'Software Center' -- extras for Ubuntu (mp3, avi, mpge, TrueType, Java,
Flash; Codecs)
Cause of non-functional videos on some sites (???) i deinstalled
flashplugin-nonfree und manuelly installed the 10.0.32.18 version from
I will throw in my vote as well her:
I have been testing Kubuntu Karmic since Alpha releases. I have
installed the 64-bit version of flashplugin manually (copied into
directory) and have had no problem since.
My only complaint is that Konqueror is prompting through Update notifier
that I need to
Confirmed. I agree that if we don't want to include 64-bit Flash yet
it's better not to include it at all. Experienced user will find a way
to get it and inexperienced one *shouldn't* use this emulated 32-bit
version as it works lower than any acceptable standards. I couldn't
scroll videos from
Sorry for double post - I only wanted to point out that most users
aren't aware that it's 32-bit Flash plugin that makes their work
unstable - e.g. I initially thought that this is 64-bit version that is
so unstable and I even started to look for 32-bit one... :)
--
Please package flashplugin
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree
- well there is a x64 version of this plugin so there is no reason using
nswraper any more
- please upgrade flash version
+ The current (32-bit) flashplugin-nonfree package in x86_64 versions of
+ Ubuntu has been reported to
I'll throw in my vote. The 64-bit alpha is very stable. I upgraded to
Karmic recently and was appalled that it still used nspluginwrapper
(which consistently crashes for me).
Who cares if the 64-bit plugin is given the name of alpha, when the
state of the current nspluginwrapper configuration
One vote more to flashplugin 64 bits alpha. In the karmic alpha 5 on my
computer the nspluginwrapper crashes all the time.
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Since the 32bit wrapper died multiple times a day I also installed the 64
alpha a week ago and not only does it play nicely with pulseaudio it also
crashed not once.
IMO the status of the 32bit wrapper is that bad that it can't be shipped -
rather remove flash entirely on 64 bit!
--
Please
@manzur: I'm also highly interested in it, but we must admit that the
plugin is officially __alpha__ released through adobe's lab ...
In some cases (http://forums.adobe.com/thread/35606) including mine, this
plugin hangs the browser up on many sites with illegal instruction error
message.
Is such a work can be considered for ubuntu ?
yeah in some aspects
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Another +1 for the x86_64 alpha being far, far, far more stable than the
nspluginwrapper cludge that is used currently.
Flash is used by a lot of people on a regular basis so I'm surprised to
see that the flash support in Ubuntu x86_64 is so poor.
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
Micah Gersten: Indeed, but we're waiting on Adobe for an official release.
Me: If i am not wrong it is yet official released, but it is not packaged yet.
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Danny, the Debian package downloads directly from Adobe, same as our old
solution.. i guess we should wait a little bit.
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Here is my understanding of the issue:
We know that 64-bit Flash alplace and alpha 2 (alpha refresh) are more
stable than the 32-bit Flash, but that isn't the problem. We would make
an exception to include it in Ubuntu, but the current script can olny
download Flash from archive.canonical.com
I have tried everything, from the official latest release of flash
plugin from Adobe website , to the flashplugin-nonfree of the repository
(that it's the same version10.0.22.87).
I use Kubuntu 9.04 64bit.
Firefox installed from repo, latest version 3.0.10.
When I am seeing a flash video in
Indeed, but we're waiting on Adobe for an official release.
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
It will be a while before it gets packaged since it is fairly far from
being released.
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Confirmed
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this bug notification because you are
I'm using the 64-bit alpha version and it's working great. I have been
experiencing browser crashes once in a while, but I don't know if that's
due to the plugin (how can you tell?). However, even if it's the plugin
that causes those crashes, they are much less annoying than constantly
having to
The native 64bit should really be packaged. I installed the flashplugin-
nonfree package on my 64bit system, but it seems that connections from
flash to external pages are broken. (this happens with the games @
netlog.com if somebody would care to check :)).
I installed the native 64bit version,
problem is that we don't have a stable URL for downloading those beta
releases. also there is no official support from adobe security wise,
which is the other main blocker on installing 64-bit by default
--
Please package flashplugin 64bit
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/326555
You received this
I understand the reluctance to package the alpha from Adobe Labs in
Ubuntu stable. However, I find the 64-bit plugin to be more stable than
the 32-bit plugin with nspluginwrapper and thunking.
(Those who do not want to wait for a package can download it from
This is most likely not going to happen (i dont advise it) until it is stable
release, Maye for KK we can do unstable release but not in Ubuntu stable
released (Jaunty included since we hit FF
This would be nice for a sync
** Summary changed:
- update flash plugin to the x64 version on AMD64
62 matches
Mail list logo
