-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 16, 2006, at 8:30 AM, Duncan Lithgow wrote:
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 17:55 -0700, Corey Burger wrote:
...
3. Fspot is likely to become part of gnome (although not by the edgy
cycle, as the author has not proposed it
So why not wait?
...
Thou
On 7/17/06, Lionel Dricot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure what advantages gthumb has over f-spot besides the mono thing.
Well, to make it clear : for me gthumb and eog are like Totem. F-spot
is like Rhythmbox. Both are for different use cases.
Gthumb and f-spot occupy the same spa
On Fri, 2006-07-14 at 17:55 -0700, Corey Burger wrote:
> ship
> fspot in place of gthumb.
>
> Advantages:
> 1. Fspot has some nice features, like flickr integration, timelining and tags
Has anyone done a feature for feature comparison?
> 2. Fspot is actively developed, gthumb is dead
Almost, som
I'm not sure what advantages gthumb has over f-spot besides the mono thing.
Well, to make it clear : for me gthumb and eog are like Totem. F-spot
is like Rhythmbox. Both are for different use cases.
It can be a good idea to ship f-spot by default like we are shipping
RB : as an available tool
