Dnia 2011-04-06, o godz. 12:26:59
Rodrigo Moya rodrigo.m...@canonical.com napisał(a):
Oh yeah, mate.
Something is wrong there, isn't? :D
the mail was sent to ubuntu-desktop, which is the admin, not you :-)
Of course, i know.
To: ubuntu-desktop@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: jbicha wants to
Hello all,
I hear that next cycle we will probably be required to ship unity-2d,
and with it Qt. This means we'll need yet another round of where to
get the space from?.
Next cycle we'll drop Python 2.6, but at the same time add Python 3,
so the python-* library packages won't shrink. In the
Priority: low
Rediscuss the structure of language-support-* metapackages vs.
language-selector's dynamic detection of missing packages; right now
this is a wild mix, and I'd like to consistently use language-selector
for everything.
This is only little actual work, but needs a bit of thought
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:06 AM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
In the last years we fell victim to an ever-growing set of language
runtimes and toolkits, but I realize that getting rid of each of them
is hard. So if we want to keep adding new features without removing
others, we
Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 10:06 +0200, Martin Pitt a écrit :
I hear that next cycle we will probably be required to ship unity-2d,
and with it Qt. This means we'll need yet another round of where to
get the space from?.
Hi,
We should probably discuss dropping classic GNOME (i.e the GNOME2
Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 09:59 +0200, Martin Pitt a écrit :
kind of obvious topic, but next cycle we'll need to move to GTK3 and
GNOME3. Aside from the obvious update the package versions, I see
the following particular challenges:
Hello,
(You stole my topic! ;-)
Joke aside we should do the
On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 10:06:54AM +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
So if we want to keep adding new features without removing
others, we might also eventually reconsider moving to 1 GB USB images
and entirely stop shipping CD images (on mirrors/shop/Loco
distribution, etc.) This would be something I
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
I expect that in practice pretty much everyone uses usb-creator and
USB sticks with the current ISOs anyway. The 700 MB limit still serves
as a good boundary because with every 100 MB it grows we'll lose some
people who
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:06 AM, Martin Pitt martin.p...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Hello all,
In the last years we fell victim to an ever-growing set of language
runtimes and toolkits, but I realize that getting rid of each of them
is hard. So if we want to keep adding new features without removing
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:25, Sebastien Bacher seb...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 10:06 +0200, Martin Pitt a écrit :
I hear that next cycle we will probably be required to ship unity-2d,
and with it Qt. This means we'll need yet another round of where to
get the space
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 10:32 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 09:59 +0200, Martin Pitt a écrit :
kind of obvious topic, but next cycle we'll need to move to GTK3 and
GNOME3. Aside from the obvious update the package versions, I see
the following particular challenges:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Rodrigo Moya rodrigo.m...@canonical.com wrote:
[...]
So, for next cycle, I would suggest a small goal of trying to do patch
upstreaming/cleaning days, maybe once a week or every 2 weeks.
Great idea :)
Also, some Ubuntu-specific patches, like the appindicators
Hi all,
As you may be aware, the next release will most likely bring in the
new version of NetworkManager (0.9 now) with all kinds of fun stuff,
like WiMAX and me porting the indicator patch to any changes that may
have been made to nm-applet for 0.9, unless it makes it upstream
before then ;)
Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 11:22 +0200, Krzysztof Klimonda a écrit :
Hmm.. I'd like to propose bringing back the idea of the Stracciatella
session, and making it possible to get both GNOME3 and Gtk+3
applications to look and behave as close as possible to what users get
in other distributions.
Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 17:00 +0530, Vishnoo a écrit :
Is Getting GNOME3 really worth it? GTK3 maybe for the parts which are
required for Unity..
Yes, we need to move away from old unmaintained and deprecated
technology for their modern equivalent (gtk2 to gtk3, gconf to dconf,
dbus-glib to
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 15:03 +0200, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
Le jeudi 07 avril 2011 à 11:22 +0200, Krzysztof Klimonda a écrit :
Hmm.. I'd like to propose bringing back the idea of the Stracciatella
session, and making it possible to get both GNOME3 and Gtk+3
applications to look and behave as
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 08:30 -0400, Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre wrote:
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 7:23 AM, Rodrigo Moya rodrigo.m...@canonical.com
wrote:
[...]
So, for next cycle, I would suggest a small goal of trying to do patch
upstreaming/cleaning days, maybe once a week or every 2 weeks.
Chris Coulson [2011-04-07 9:25 +0100]:
- Firstly, I think we should kill po2xpi entirely. It's basically
doing what the Firefox build system is already very good at doing
(building xpi's from source). We should be using the Firefox build
system to build the language pack xpi's that we ship.
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre [2011-04-07 8:42 -0400]:
- NM integration with proxy configuration
+1 on that (I was actually about to bring that up myself, but you beat
me to it :) ).
GNOME 3 already solves this very nicely.
Martin
--
Martin Pitt| http://www.piware.de
Ubuntu
Since now both Firefox and Chromium have committed to rapid release
schedules, I think it's time to reevaluate the default browser in
Ubuntu. I am concerned that some of these upgrades might break system
integration at some point. While the security team does its best to
prevent regressions, we
On 04/07/2011 05:59 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hello all,
kind of obvious topic, but next cycle we'll need to move to GTK3 and
GNOME3. Aside from the obvious update the package versions, I see
the following particular challenges:
* Review our patches, and be rather aggressive about removing
On 04/07/2011 09:23 PM, Rodrigo Moya wrote:
Priority: medium?
While working on the GNOME3 PPA during this cycle, I found we have a lot
of patches in many packages, which makes things harder when upgrading to
major versions, and also introduces new ways for the apps to fail, as
the fixes are
On 04/07/2011 05:59 PM, Martin Pitt wrote:
Hello all,
kind of obvious topic, but next cycle we'll need to move to GTK3 and
GNOME3. Aside from the obvious update the package versions, I see
the following particular challenges:
* Review our patches, and be rather aggressive about removing
Also, some Ubuntu-specific patches, like the appindicators ones are
duplicated in lots of packages, so it would be good if we could find a
better way to make upstream apps use them, like, for instance, patching
gtk_status_icon_* in GTK itself to use the indicators when available,
instead of
Hi all,
I think I can offer some opinions on this without repeating what
others say too much.
I want to compare this to the decision a few releases ago to make
Empathy the default IM client in Ubuntu. Then why I think Unity
should become the default desktop session and not classic GNOME.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Rick Spencer rick.spen...@canonical.com wrote:
1. There are key feature regressions, for example, there is no systray
support for many important applications.
According to the AppIndicator Design document the notification area
will be phased out:
I can honestly say that when I am not in a unity environment, I don't feel
at home. I bounce back and forth between ubuntu and osx, and when nvidia was
broken, and when I'm in osx, I often find myself trying to 4 finger slide,
throwing my mouse to 0,0, tapping super, and generally evoking unity
27 matches
Mail list logo
